Letters53 Letter LIII. To the same (Circa A.D. 1128)
Letter LIII. To the same (Circa A.D. 1128)
He presents to Haimeric two religious, and in them himself.
I remember that I have written to you on behalf of many people, and by the medium of many; but now I, who have often corresponded with you, am present before you in person. Represent to yourself three persons in the two whom you behold, since without me these are not able to exist, in whose hearts I rest in close companionship, and even more safely and sweetly than in my own. I seem to exaggerate, but only to one who has never felt the power of friendship, who is ignorant of the force of affection, who does not believe that the multitude of believers "were of one heart and of one soul (Acts iv. 32). He, then, who sees them sees me also, though not in my own body, and what they say I say also with their tongues. I am absent in body, I confess; but the body is the least part of me. And if it is true that he who sees my face may assert with truth that he sees me and not a part of me only, when notwithstanding he sees only a part of me, and that the least considerable, how much more truly may I say that I am present, even without bodily presence, where I feel my will, my spirit, and affection, which is the greater and more worthy part of me, to be? Know, then, that we are one person in three bodies, not of equal holiness, for in this I am inferior to each of these two, but having the same will, and perfect union of souls. For why should not the bond of affection bring about the unity of several persons in one spirit, if the bond of marriage makes two to be one flesh? I could wish that you would make yourself the fourth with us, if you do not consider that unity of affection unworthy of you. This you will easily obtain, if you do not disdain it; only if you do not desire it, I beg you not to let them perceive this. Farewell.
Pro multis et per multos memini me scripsisse ad vos; sed nunc ipse qui loquebar, ecce adsum. Tres in duobus conspicitis, quoniam absque me esse non possunt, in quorum jugiter pectoribus requiesco, et quidem securius atque suavius quam in proprio. Mentiri videor, sed ei qui amicitiae vim nunquam sensit, qui virtutem charitatis ignorat, qui non credit multitudinis credentium fuisse cor unum, et animam unam. Qui ergo videt eos, videt et me, etsi non in meo corpore: et quod loquuntur ipsi, ego pariter loquor, sed eorum linguis. Corpore, fateor, absum: sed haec est exigua portio mei. Porro qui vidit faciem meam tantum, sine culpa et sine nota mendacii asserit se vidisse non partem mei, sed me: cum tamen nonnisi partem, et partem modicam viderit. Quanto itaque verius esse me dixerim, etiam sine praesentia corporis, ubi meam sentio voluntatem, meum spiritum et amorem, quae utique est pars potior digniorque mei? Tribus ergo in corporibus unum nos esse noveritis, non pari sanctitate, qua ambobus ego inferior sum, sed eadem voluntate, et summa concordia animorum. Cur enim unitatem hanc inter diversos non faciat compago charitatis in uno spiritu, si carnalis copula efficit ut sint duo in carne una? Quartum vos addi velim, si dignum judicatis et in eamdem concurrere unitatem dilectionis. Quod facile, si non contemnitis, obtinebitis: tantum id vos nequaquam contemnere eis cognitum faciatis. Valete.