Concerning the Nature of Good, Against the Manichæans 20

sant'Agostino d'Ippona (354–430 d.C.) · De natura boni · PL 42, 551–572

20 Pain Only in Good Natures PL 42, 557

But pain which some suppose to be in an especial manner an evil, whether it be in mind or in body, cannot exist except in good natures. For the very fact of resistance in any being leading to pain, involves a refusal not to be what it was, because it was something good; but when a being is compelled to something better, the pain is useful, when to something worse, it is useless. Therefore in the case of the mind, the will resisting a greater power causes pain; in the case of the body, sensation resisting a more powerful body causes pain. But evils without pain are worse: for it is worse to rejoice iniquity than to bewail corruption; yet even such rejoicing cannot exist save from the attainment of inferior good things. But iniquity is the desertion of better things. Likewise in a body, a wound with pain is better than painless putrescence, which is especially called the corruption which the dead flesh of the Lord did not see, that is, did not suffer, as was predicted in prophecy: "Thou shall not suffer Thy Holy one to see corruption." For who denies that He was wounded by the piercing of the nails, and that He was stabbed with the lance? But even what is properly called by men corporeal corruption, that is, putrescence itself, if as yet there is anything left to consume, increases by the diminution of the good. But if corruption shall have absolutely consumed it, so that there is no good, no nature will remain, for there will be nothing that corruption may corrupt; and so there will not even be putrescence, for there will be nowhere at all for it to be.

Dolor nonnisi in naturis bonis. Dolor autem, quod praecipue malum nonnulli arbitrantur, sive in animo sive in corpore sit, nec ipse potest esse nisi in naturis bonis. Hoc enim ipsum quod resistit ut doleat, quodam modo recusat non esse quod erat, quia bonum aliquod erat: sed cum ad melius cogitur, utilis dolor est; cum ad deterius, inutilis. In animo ergo dolorem facit voluntas resistens potestati majori: in corpore dolorem facit sensus resistens corpori potentiori. Sunt autem mala sine dolore pejora: pejus est enim gaudere de iniquitate, quam dolere de corruptione: verumtamen etiam tale gaudium non potest esse nisi ex adeptione bonorum inferiorum; sed iniquitas est desertio meliorum. Item in corpore melius est vulnus cum dolore, quam putredo sine dolore, quae specialiter corruptio dicitur: quam non vidit, id est, non passa est mortua caro Domini, sicut in prophetia praedictum erat, Nec dabis sanctum tuum videre corruptionem . Nam vulneratum esse confixione clavorum, et percussum de lancea quis negat ? Sed etiam ipsa quae proprie ab hominibus corruptio corporis dicitur, id est, ipsa putredo, si adhuc habet aliquid quod alte consumat, bonum minuendo crescit corruptio. Quod si penitus absumpserit, sicut nullum bonum, ita nulla natura remanebit, quia jam corruptio quod corrumpat non erit; et ideo nec ipsa putredo erit, quia ubi sit omnino non erit.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Salva per dopo

Inserisci la tua email: ti invieremo un link per accedere. Nessuna password. Ciò che salvi (voci, versetti, capitoli, documenti) ti segue su ogni dispositivo.