Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 102
102.1 Chapter XVI. 23–28 PL 35, 1896
1. We have now to consider these words of the Lord, “Verily, verily, I say unto you, If ye shall ask anything of the Father in my name, He will give it you.” It has already been said in the earlier portions of this discourse of our Lord’s, on account of those who ask some things of the Father in Christ’s name and receive them not, that there is nothing asked of the Father in the Saviour’s name that is asked in contrariety to the method of salvation. For it is not the sound of the letters and syllables, but what the sound itself imports, and what is rightly and truly to be understood by that sound, that He is to be regarded as declaring, when He says, “in my name.” Hence, he who has such ideas of Christ as ought not to be entertained of the only Son of God, asketh not in His name, even though he may not abstain from the mention of Christ in so many letters and syllables; since it is only in His name he asketh, of whom he is thinking when he asketh. But he who has such ideas of Him as ought to be entertained, asketh in His name, and receiveth what he asketh, if he asketh nothing that is contrary to his own everlasting salvation. And he receiveth it when he ought to receive it. For some things are not refused, but are delayed till they can be given at a suitable time. In this way, surely, we are to understand His words, “He will give you,” so that thereby we may know that those benefits are signified which are properly applicable to those who ask. For all the saints are heard effectively in their own behalf, but are not so heard in behalf of all besides, whether friends or enemies, or any others: for it is not said in a general kind of way, “He will give;” but, “He will give you.”
Domini verba nunc ista tractanda sunt, Amen, amen dico vobis, si quid petieritis Patrem in nomine meo, dabit vobis. Jam dictum est in superioribus hujus dominici sermonis partibus, propter eos qui nonnulla petunt a Patre in Christi nomine, nec accipiunt, non peti in nomine Salvatoris quidquid petitur contra rationem salutis . Non enim sonum litterarum ac syllabarum, sed quod sonus ipse significat, et quod eo sono recte ac veraciter intelligitur, hoc accipiendus est dicere cum dicit, in nomine meo. Unde qui hoc sentit de Christo quod non est de unico Dei Filio sentiendum, non petit in ejus nomine, etiamsi non taceat litteris ac syllabis Christum; quoniam in ejus nomine petit, quem cogitat cum petit. Qui vero quod est de illo sentiendum sentit, ipse in ejus nomine petit; et accipit quod petit, si non contra suam salutem sempiternam petit. Accipit autem quando debet accipere. Quaedam enim non negantur, sed ut congruo dentur tempore differuntur. Ita sane intelligendum est quod ait, dabit vobis, ut ea beneficia significata sciantur his verbis, quae ad eos qui petunt proprie pertinent. Exaudiuntur quippe omnes sancti pro seipsis, non autem pro omnibus exaudiuntur vel amicis vel inimicis suis, vel quibuslibet aliis: quia non utcumque dictum est, dabit; sed dabit vobis.
102.2 PL 35, 1896
2. “Hitherto,” He says, “ye have not asked anything in my name. Ask, and ye shall receive, that your joy may be full.” This that He calls a full joy is certainly no carnal joy, but a spiritual one; and when it shall be so great as to be no longer capable of any additions to it, it will then doubtless be full. Whatever, then, is asked as belonging to the attainment of this joy, is to be asked in the name of Christ, if we understand the grace of God, and if we are truly in quest of a blessed life. But if aught different from this is asked, there is nothing asked: not that the thing itself is nothing at all, but that in comparison with what is so great, anything else that is coveted is virtually nothing. For, of course, the man is not actually nothing, of whom the apostle says, “He who thinketh himself to be something, when he is nothing.” But surely in comparison with the spiritual man, who knows that by the grace of God he is what he is, he who makes vain assumptions is nothing. In this way, then, may the words also be rightly understood, “Verily, verily, I say unto you, if ye shall ask anything of the Father in my name, He will give [it] you;” that by the words, “if anything,” should not be understood anything whatever, but anything that is not really nothing in connection with the life of blessedness. And what follows, “Hitherto ye have not asked anything in my name,” may be understood in two ways: either, that ye have not asked in my name, because a name that ye have not known as it is yet to be known; or, ye have not asked anything, since in comparison with that which ye ought to have asked, what ye have asked is to be accounted as nothing. In order, then, that, they may ask in His name, not that which is nothing, but a full joy (since anything different from this that they ask is virtually nothing), He addresses to them the exhortation, “Ask, and ye shall receive, that your joy may be full;” that is, ask this in my name, that your joy may be full, and ye shall receive. For His saints, who persevere in asking such a good thing as this, will in no wise be defrauded by the mercy of God.
Usque modo, inquit, non petistis quidquam in nomine meo. Petite, et accipietis, ut gaudium vestrum sit plenum. Hoc quod dicit gaudium plenum, profecto non carnale, sed spirituale gaudium est: et quando tantum erit, ut aliquid ei jam non sit addendum, procul dubio tunc erit plenum. Quidquid ergo petitur quod pertineat ad hoc gaudium consequendum, hoc est in nomine Christi petendum, si divinam intelligimus gratiam, si vere beatam poscimus vitam. Quidquid autem aliud petitur, nihil petitur: non quia nulla omnino res est, sed quia in tantae rei comparatione quidquid aliud concupiscitur, nihil est. Neque enim prorsus nulla res est homo, de quo ait Apostolus: Qui se putat aliquid esse, cum nihil sit . In comparatione quippe spiritualis hominis, qui scit gratia Dei se esse quod est, quisquis vana praesumit, nihil est. Etiam sic ergo recte intelligi potest, Amen, amen dico vobis, si quid petieritis Patrem in nomine meo, dabit vobis; ut hoc quod ait, si quid, non quodlibet intelligatur, sed aliquid quod non in beatae vitae comparatione sit nihil. Et quod sequitur, Usque modo non petistis quidquam in nomine meo, duobus modis intelligi potest: vel quia non in nomine meo petistis, quod nomen non sicut cognoscendum est cognovistis; vel non petistis quidquam, quoniam in comparatione rei quam petere debuistis, pro nihilo habendum est quod petistis. Ut igitur in ejus nomine non nihil, sed gaudium plenum petant (quoniam si aliquid aliud petunt, idem aliquid nihil est), exhortatur dicens, Petite, et accipietis, ut gaudium vestrum sit plenum: id est, hoc in nomine meo petite, ut gaudium vestrum sit plenum, et accipietis. Isto enim bono in petendo perseverantes sanctos suos nequaquam misericordia divina fraudabit.
102.3 PL 35, 1897
3. “These things,” said He, “have I spoken to you in proverbs: but the hour cometh, when I shall no more speak unto you in proverbs, but I shall show you plainly of my Father.” I might be disposed to say that this hour, whereof He speaketh, must be understood as that future period when we shall see openly, as the blessed Paul says, “face to face;” that what He says, “These things have I spoken to you in proverbs,” is one with what has been said by the same apostle, “Now we see through a glass, in a riddle:” and “I will show you,” because the Father shall be seen through the instrumentality of the Son, is akin to what He says elsewhere, “Neither knoweth any man the Father, save the Son, and [he] to whom the Son shall be pleased to reveal Him.” But such a sense seems to be interfered with by that which follows: “At that day ye shall ask in my name.” For in that future world, when we have reached the kingdom where we shall be like Him, for we shall see Him as He is, what shall we then have to ask, when our desire shall be satisfied with good things? As it is also said in another psalm: “I shall be satisfied when Thy glory shall be revealed.” For petition has to do with some kind of want, which can have no place there where such abundance shall reign.
Haec, inquit, in proverbiis locutus sum vobis: venit hora cum jam non in proverbiis loquar vobis, sed palam de Patre meo annuntiabo vobis. Possem dicere hanc de qua loquitur horam, futurum oportere saeculum intelligi, ubi videbimus palam, quod beatus Paulus dicit, facie ad faciem; ut quod ait, Haec in proverbiis locutus sum vobis, hoc sit quod ab eodem apostolo dictum est, Videmus nunc per speculum in aenigmate : annuntiabo autem vobis, quia per Filium Pater videbitur, juxta illud quod alibi ait, Neque Patrem quis cognoscit, nisi Filius, et cui voluerit Filius revelare . Sed istum sensum videtur impedire quod sequitur: Illo die in nomine meo petetis. In futuro enim saeculo cum pervenerimus ad regnum, ubi similes ei erimus, quoniam videbimus eum sicuti est , quid petituri sumus, quando satiabitur in bonis desiderium nostrum ? Unde et in alio psalmo dicitur: Satiabor cum manifestabitur gloria tua . Petitio namque alicujus est indigentiae, quae ibi nulla erit ubi haec satietas erit.
102.4 PL 35, 1897
4. It remains, therefore, for us, so far as my capacity to apprehend it goes, to understand Jesus as having promised that He would cause His disciples, from being carnal and natural, to become spiritual, although not yet such as we shall be, when a spiritual body shall also be ours; but such as was he who said, “We speak wisdom among them that are perfect;” and, “I could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal;” and, “We have received, not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit who is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God. Which things also we speak, not in the words which man’s wisdom teacheth, but which the Spirit teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual. But the natural man perceiveth not the things of the Spirit of God.” And thus the natural man, perceiving not the things of the Spirit of God, hears in such a way whatever is told him of the nature of God, that he can conceive of nothing else but some bodily form, however spacious or immense, however lustrous and magnificent, yet still a body: and therefore he holds as proverbs all that is said of the incorporeal and immutable substance of wisdom; not that he accounts them as proverbs, but that his thoughts follow the same direction as those who habitually listen to proverbs without understanding them. But when the spiritual man begins to discern all things, and he himself is discerned by no man, he perceives, even though in this life it still be through a glass and in part, not by any bodily sense, and not by any imaginative conception which catches at or devises the likenesses of all sorts of bodies, but by the clearest understanding of the mind, that God is not material, but spiritual: in such a way does the Son show us openly of the Father, that He, who thus shows, is also Himself seen to be of the same substance. And then it is that those who ask, ask in His name; for in the sound of that name they understand nothing else than what the reality is that is called by that name, and harbor not, in vanity or infirmity of mind, the fiction of the Father being in one place, and the Son in another, standing before the Father and making request in our behalf, with the material substances of both occupying each its own place, and the Word pleading verbally for us with Him whose Word He is, while a definite space interposes between the mouth of the speaker and the ears of the hearer; and other such absurdities which those who are natural, and at the same time carnal, fabricate for themselves in their hearts. For any such thing, suggested by the experience of bodily habits, as occurs to spiritual men when thinking of God, they deny and reject, and drive away, like troublesome insects, from the eyes of their mind; and resign themselves to the purity of that light by whose testimony and judgment they prove these bodily images that thrust themselves on their inward vision to be altogether false. These are able to a certain extent to think of our Lord Jesus Christ, in respect of His manhood, as addressing the Father on our behalf; but in respect to His Godhead, as hearing [and answering] us along with the Father. And this I am of opinion that He indicated, when He said, “And I say not that I will pray the Father for you.” But the intuitive perception of this, how it is that the Son asketh not the Father, but that Father and Son alike listen to those who ask, is a height that can be reached only by the spiritual eye of the mind.
Relinquitur itaque, quantum sapere valeo, ut intelligatur Jesus discipulos suos de carnalibus vel animalibus se spirituales promisisse facturum, quamvis nondum tales quales erimus, quando spirituale etiam corpus habebimus; sed qualis erat qui dicebat, « Sapientiam loquimur inter perfectos » ; et, « Non potui vobis loqui quasi spiritualibus, sed quasi carnalibus » ; et, « Non spiritum hujus mundi accepimus, sed Spiritum qui ex Deo est, ut sciamus quae a Deo donata sunt nobis; quae et loquimur, non in sapientiae humanae doctis verbis, sed doctis Spiritus, spiritualibus spiritualia comparantes. Animalis autem homo non percipit quae sunt Spiritus Dei. » Non itaque percipiens quae sunt Spiritus Dei homo animalis, sic audit quaecumque audit de Dei natura, ut aliud quam corpus cogitare non possit, quamlibet amplissimum vel immensum, quamlibet lucidum ac speciosum, corpus tamen: ideo proverbia illi sunt quaecumque dicta sapientiae de incorporea immutabilique substantia; non quod ea tanquam proverbia deputat, sed quia sic cogitat, quomodo qui proverbia solent audire neque intelligere. Cum vero spiritualis coeperit omnia dijudicare, ipse autem a nemine dijudicari , etiamsi in hac vita adhuc velut per speculum ex parte, perspicit tamen non ullo corporis sensu, non ulla imaginaria cogitatione quae capit aut fingit qualiumcumque similitudines corporum, sed mentis certissima intelligentia, Deum non corpus esse, sed spiritum: ita palam de Patre annuntiante Filio, ut ejusdem substantiae conspiciatur et ipse qui annuntiat. Tunc in ejus nomine petunt qui petunt; quia in sono ejus nominis non aliud quam res ipsa est quae hoc nomine vocatur, intelligunt, nec animi vanitate vel infirmitate confingunt tanquam in alio loco Patrem, in alio Filium ante Patrem stantem, et pro nobis rogantem, spatia sua quaeque amborum occupantibus molibus, et Verbum ad eum cujus est Verbum facere verba pro nobis, intervallo interposito inter os loquentis et auriculas audientis; et alia talia quae sibi animales, iidemque carnales in cordibus fabricantur. Quidquid enim tale spiritualibus de Deo cogitantibus ex corporum consuetudine occurrit, negando atque respuendo, tanquam importunas muscas, ab interioribus oculis abigunt; et sinceritati ejus lucis acquiescunt, qua teste ac judice has ipsas imagines corporum suis internis aspectibus irruentes, falsas omnino esse convincunt. Hi possunt utcumque cogitare Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum in quantum homo est, pro nobis interpellare Patrem; in quantum autem Deus est, nos exaudire cum Patre. Quod eum significasse arbitror ubi ait, Et non dico vobis quia ego rogabo Patrem de vobis. Ad hoc quippe intuendum quomodo non rogat Patrem Filius, sed simul exaudiunt rogantes Pater et Filius, nonnisi spiritualis oculus mentis ascendit.
102.5 PL 35, 1898
5. “For the Father Himself,” He says, “loveth you, because ye have loved me.” Is it the case, then, that He loveth, because we love; or rather, that we love, because He loveth? Let this same evangelist give us the answer out of his own epistle: “We love Him,” he says, “because He first loved us.” This, then, was the efficient cause of our loving, that we were loved. And certainly to love God is the gift of God. He it was that gave the grace to love Him, who loved while still unloved. Even when displeasing Him we were loved, that there might be that in us whereby we should become pleasing in His sight. For we could not love the Son unless we loved the Father also. The Father loveth us, because we love the Son; seeing it is of the Father and Son we have received [the power] to love both the Father and the Son: for love is shed abroad in our hearts by the Spirit of both, by which Spirit we love both the Father and the Son, and whom we love along with the Father and the Son. God, therefore, it was that wrought this religious love of ours whereby we worship God; and He saw that it is good, and on that account He Himself loved that which He had made. But He would not have wrought in us something He could love, were it not that He loved ourselves before He wrought it.
Ipse enim Pater, inquit, amat vos, quia vos me amastis. Ideo amat ille, quia nos amamus; an potius, quia ille amat, ideo nos amamus? Ex Epistola sua evangelista idem ipse respondeat: Nos diligimus, inquit, quia prior ipse dilexit nos . Hinc ergo factum est ut diligeremus, quia dilecti sumus. Prorsus donum Dei est diligere Deum. Ipse ut diligeretur dedit, qui non dilectus dilexit. Displicentes amati sumus, ut esset in nobis unde placeremus. Non enim amaremus Filium, nisi amaremus et Patrem. Amat nos Pater, quia nos amamus Filium; cum a Patre et Filio acceperimus ut et Patrem amemus et Filium: diffundit enim charitatem in cordibus nostris amborum Spiritus , per quem Spiritum et Patrem amamus et Filium, et quem Spiritum cum Patre amamus et Filio. Amorem itaque nostrum pium quo colimus Deum, fecit Deus, et vidit quia bonum est, ideo quippe amavit ipse quod fecit. Sed in nobis non faceret quod amaret, nisi antequam id faceret, nos amaret.
102.6 PL 35, 1898
6. “And ye have believed,” He adds, “that I came out from God. I came forth from the Father, and am come into the world: again I leave the world, and go to the Father.” Clearly we have believed. For surely it ought not to be accounted a thing incredible because of this, that in coming to the world He came forth in such a sense from the Father that He did not leave the Father behind; and that, on leaving the world, He goes to the Father in such a sense that He does not actually forsake the world. For He came forth from the Father because He is of the Father; and He came into the world, in showing to the world His bodily form, which He had received of the Virgin. He left the world by a bodily withdrawal, He proceeded to the Father by His ascension as man, but He forsook not the world in the ruling activity of His presence.
Et credidistis, inquit, quia a Deo exivi. Exivi a Patre et veni in mundum: iterum relinquo mundum, et vado ad Patrem. Plane credidimus. Neque enim propterea debet incredibile videri, quia sic ad mundum veniens exiit a Patre, ut non desereret Patrem; et sic vadit ad Patrem relicto mundo, ut non deserat mundum. Exiit enim a Patre, quia de Patre est: in mundum venit, quia mundo suum corpus ostendit quod de Virgine assumpsit. Reliquit mundum corporali discessione, perrexit ad Patrem hominis ascensione, nec mundum deseruit praesentiae gubernatione.