Against the Epistle of Manichæus, Called Fundamental 7

sant'Agostino d'Ippona (354–430 d.C.) · Contra epistolam Manichaei · PL 42, 172–203

7 In What Sense the Followers of Manichæus Believe Him to Be the Holy Spirit PL 42, 177

8. Besides, you should explain how it is that, while the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are united in equality of nature, as you also acknowledge, you are not ashamed to speak of Manichæus, a man taken into union with the Holy Spirit, as born of ordinary generation; and yet you shrink from believing that the man taken into union with the only-begotten Wisdom of God was born of a Virgin. If human flesh, if generation [concubitus viri], if the womb of a woman could not contaminate the Holy Spirit, how could the Virgin’s womb contaminate the Wisdom of God? This Manichæus, then, who boasts of a connection with the Holy Spirit, and of being spoken of in the gospel, must produce his claim to either of these two things,—that he was sent by the Spirit, or that he was taken into union with the Spirit. If he was sent, let him call himself the apostle of the Paraclete; if taken into union, let him allow that He whom the only-begotten Son took upon Himself had a human mother, since he admits a human father as well as mother in the case of one taken up by the Holy Spirit. Let him believe that the Word of God was not defiled by the virgin womb of Mary, since he exhorts us to believe that the Holy Spirit could not be defiled by the married life of his parents. But if you say that Manichæus was united to the Spirit, not in the womb or before conception, but after his birth, still you must admit that he had a fleshly nature derived from man and woman. And since you are not afraid to speak of the blood and the bodily substance of Manichæus as coming from ordinary generation, or of the internal impurities contained in his flesh, and hold that the Holy Spirit, who took on Himself, as you believe, this human being, was not contaminated by all those things, why should I shrink from speaking of the Virgin’s womb and body undefiled, and not rather believe that the Wisdom of God in union with the human being in his mother’s flesh still remained free from stain and pollution? Wherefore, as, whether your Manichæus professes to be sent by or to be united with the Paraclete, neither statement can hold good, I am on my guard, and refuse to believe either in his mission or in his susception.

Cur apostolum Christi se scripserit. Quaero enim, cur epistolae hujus principium sit, Manichaeus apostolus Jesu Christi; et non sit, Paracletus apostolus Jesu Christi. Si autem missus a Christo Paracletus Manichaeum misit, cur lego, Manichaeus apostolus Jesu Christi; et non potius, Manichaeus apostolus Paracleti? Si dicis ipsum esse Christum, qui est etiam Spiritus sanctus, contradicis ipsi Scripturae, ubi Dominus ait, Et alium Paracletum mittam vobis . Si autem Christi nomen ideo recte positum putas, non quia ipse est Christus, qui et Paracletus, sed quia ejusdem sunt ambo substantiae; id est, non quia unus est, sed quia unum sunt: poterat et Paulus dicere, Paulus apostolus Dei Patris; quia dixit Dominus, Ego et Pater unum sumus . Nusquam hoc dicit: sed nec quisquam Apostolorum Patris se apostolum scribit. Quid sibi ergo vult ista novitas? Nonne vobis videtur nescio quam redolere fallaciam? Certe si nihil interesse arbitratus est, cur non varie in aliis epistolis apostolum Christi se nominat; in aliis, Paracleti? Sed Christi semper audivi, quotiescumque audivi: Paracleti autem nec semel. Quid hoc esse causae arbitramur, nisi quia illa superbia, mater omnium haereticorum, impulit hominem, ut non missum se a Paracleto vellet videri; sed ita susceptum, ut ipse Paracletus diceretur? Sicut Jesus Christus homo, non a Dei Filio, id est Virtute et Sapientia Dei, per quam facta sunt omnia, missus est; sed ita susceptus secundum catholicam fidem, ut ipse esset Dei Filius, id est, in illo ipso Dei Sapientia sanandis peccatoribus appareret: sic se ille voluit a Spiritu sancto, quem Christus promisit, videri esse susceptum, ut jam cum audimus Manichaeum Spiritum sanctum, intelligamus apostolum Jesu Christi, id est, missum a Jesu Christo, qui eum se missurum esse promisit. Singularis audacia ista, et ineffabile sacrilegium!

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Salva per dopo

Inserisci la tua email: ti invieremo un link per accedere. Nessuna password. Ciò che salvi (voci, versetti, capitoli, documenti) ti segue su ogni dispositivo.