A Treatise on the Spirit and the Letter 25

sant'Agostino d'Ippona (354–430 d.C.) · De spiritu et littera · PL 44, 201–246

25 The Passage in Romans PL 44, 216

Now carefully consider this entire passage, and see whether it says anything about circumcision, or the Sabbath, or anything else pertaining to a foreshadowing sacrament. Does not its whole scope amount to this, that the letter which forbids sin fails to give man life, but rather “killeth,” by increasing concupiscence, and aggravating sinfulness by transgression, unless indeed grace liberates us by the law of faith, which is in Christ Jesus, when His love is “shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost, which is given to us?” The apostle having used these words: “That we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter,” goes on to inquire, “What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay; I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet. But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence. For without the law sin was dead. For I was alive without the law once; but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died. And the commandment, which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death. For sin, taking occasion by the commandment deceived me, and by it slew me. Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good. Was then that which is good made death unto me? God forbid. But sin, that it might appear sin, worked death in me by that which is good; that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful. For we know that the law is spiritual; whereas I am carnal, sold under sin. For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that I do not; but what I hate, that I do. If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good. But then it is no longer I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me. For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh) dwelleth no good thing. To will, indeed, is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not. For the good that I would, I do not; but the evil which I would not, that I do. Now, if I do that which I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me. I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me. For I delight in the law of God after the inward man: but I see another law in my members warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members. O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death? The grace of God, through Jesus Christ out Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God, but with the flesh the law of sin.”

Quem totum locum attende, et vide utrum quidquam propter circumcisionem vel sabbatum, vel quid aliud umbratilis sacramenti, ac non totum propter hoc dicat, quod littera prohibens peccatum non vivificat hominem, sed potius occidit, augendo concupiscentiam, et iniquitatem praevaricatione cumulando, nisi liberet gratia per legem fidei quae est in Christo Jesu, cum diffunditur charitas in cordibus nostris per Spiritum sanctum qui datus est nobis . Cum enim dixisset, « Ut serviamus in novitate spiritus, et non in vetustate litterae: Quid ergo dicemus, » inquit? « Lex peccatum est? Absit: sed peccatum non cognovi, nisi per legem. Nam concupiscentiam nesciebam, nisi lex diceret, Non concupisces. Occasione autem accepta, peccatum per mandatum operatum est in me omnem concupiscentiam. Sine lege enim peccatum mortuum erat. Ego autem vivebam aliquando sine lege, adveniente autem mandato peccatum revixit. Ego autem mortuus sum, et inventum est mihi mandatum quod erat in vitam, hoc esse in mortem. Peccatum enim occasione accepta per mandatum fefellit me, et per illud occidit. Itaque lex quidem sancta, et mandatum sanctum, et justum, et bonum. Quod ergo bonum est, factum est mihi mors? Absit. Sed peccatum ut appareat peccatum, per bonum mihi operatum est mortem, ut fiat super modum peccans peccatum per mandatum. Scimus enim quia lex spiritualis est; ego autem carnalis sum, venumdatus sub peccato. Quod enim operor, ignoro; non enim quod volo, hoc ago; sed quod odi, illud facio. Si autem quod nolo, hoc facio; consentio legi, quoniam bona. Nunc autem non jam ego operor illud, sed quod habitat in me peccatum. Scio enim quia non habitat in me, hoc est in carne mea, bonum. Velle enim adjacet mihi, perficere autem bonum non. Non enim quod volo facio bonum; sed quod nolo malum, hoc ago. Si autem quod nolo ego hoc facio, jam non ego operor illud, sed quod habitat in me peccatum. Invenio ergo legem volenti mihi facere bonum, quoniam mihi malum adjacet. Condelector enim legi Dei secundum interiorem hominem: video autem aliam legem in membris meis repugnantem legi mentis meae, et captivantem me in lege peccati, quae est in membris meis. Miser ego homo, quis me liberabit de corpore mortis hujus? Gratia Dei per Jesum Christum Dominum nostrum. Igitur ego ipse mente servio legi Dei, carne autem legi peccati .

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Salva per dopo

Inserisci la tua email: ti invieremo un link per accedere. Nessuna password. Ciò che salvi (voci, versetti, capitoli, documenti) ti segue su ogni dispositivo.