Mortgage

MORTGAGE. – From ὑπό = beneath and τύψιμ = I place, it is a subsidiary contract serving as security for another; and it concerns immovable property belonging to the debtor or to a third party.

I. NATURE AND FOUNDATION

In the social exchange of goods it is not always possible to pay the agreed price; it is reasonable that in such a case the person who gives should be assured of receiving what is owed him; this is required by the very continuity of the exchange of goods. For something of little value, the word of a known and honest person is sufficient; but in the case of substantial sums and of persons not well known, or of an unnamed creditor (a company), an objective guarantee is necessary; all the more so because, through force majeure, even prudent persons encounter unforeseen financial difficulties. Hence the origin of the various real guarantees. Among these is the i.

The system of guarantees in contracts was already known among the Eastern peoples and the Greeks, although the nature of these guarantees is disputed owing to the lack of texts. Among the ancient Romans, fiducia and piguus were used; later, with the increase in exchanges, the i. was introduced as an improvement on piguus; nevertheless, it had two deficiencies: it lacked publicity and extended only to the farming implements brought by the tenant onto the leased property. A further improvement was made in Justinian law. The modern age began introducing publicity and specificity toward the beginning of the seventeenth century, but their general introduction took place in the last century. England has the i. with a somewhat different character (mortgage).

II. IN ITALIAN CIVIL LAW

The nature of the mortgage as a real right in immovable property serving as security, established over specific assets of the debtor or of a third party, is deduced from arts. 2808 ff. of the Italian Civil Code (cf. also art. 2740); here the creditor is granted the right to expropriate the asset, even as against a third-party purchaser, in order to satisfy the debt in preference to other creditors who do not have privileged claims. In Italian law, a mortgage may be legal, judicial, or voluntary.

1) Constitution. — All marketable immovable property, together with its appurtenances, may be mortgaged, as may certain real rights in immovable property (surface rights, usufruct, emphyteusis); among movables, registered government annuities, ships, aircraft, and motor vehicles (art. 2810). Constitution requires both title and registration.

In some cases, it is the law that grants the mortgage (legal mortgage: art. 2817). Such a mortgage is recognized in favor of the alienator over the assets alienated, for the performance of the obligations arising from the act of alienation; in favor of co-heirs, partners, and co-owners for the payment of equalization sums, over the immovable property allotted to the other co-owners; in favor of the wife over the husband’s assets as security for the dowry; and in favor of the State over the accused’s assets. A judicial mortgage is granted by the judge in every judgment ordering payment of a sum, performance of an obligation, or compensation for damages. In every contract containing a voluntary agreement, a mortgage may be established (voluntary mortgage), provided that the owner of the asset grants it by unilateral declaration in a public or authenticated instrument, excluding a will (art. 2821 ff.).

For civil-law purposes, registration in the public registers is mandatory; indeed, its effects begin with registration.

In every land-registry office, an official known as the “registrar of the registers” is assigned responsibility, together with the corresponding liability, for keeping the mortgages up to date (cf. arts. 2852 f.; 2843; 2847-2851; 2882; 2673; 2675; 2682).

A duly registered mortgage is valid for twenty years (art. 2847). If the interested party fails to arrange for renewal, he forfeits his rights; he may nevertheless obtain a new registration, valid from the new date (art. 2848); the mortgage securing the dowry is excepted (art. 2849).

2) Rights of the creditor, debtor, and third-party purchaser. — The creditor: a) in the event of the debtor’s default, may satisfy his claim by requesting, upon the agreed due date, the expropriation of the mortgaged assets, even if in the meantime they have passed to third parties. b) As against other non-privileged creditors (art. 2745 ff.), he has a right of priority, enabling him to satisfy the entire claim. The rank of the mortgage among several mortgage creditors must be taken into account.

The debtor, if he possesses the property, must not be disturbed; he may collect its fruits until the due date and may redeem it from the mortgage by satisfying his obligation.

A mortgage may also be granted in favor of the debtor by a third party over that party’s own assets (third-party mortgagor); it may also happen that, after registration, the mortgaged asset is alienated to a third party (third-party purchaser). The latter is subject to the enforcement action of the mortgage creditor, since the mortgage is a real right. However, being personally extraneous to the obligation-based relations between creditor and debtor, he has by law certain options, to be exercised at his choice: pay the creditor directly, thereby becoming in turn a creditor of the debtor; free the asset from the mortgage by offering the creditor the price stipulated with the other party; or surrender the asset to expropriation, with the right to the corresponding indemnity from the debtor (arts. 2858-67).

3) Several mortgages may be established over the same asset; in this event, the rule «prior tempore potior iure» applies, time being calculated from the day of the individual registrations according to rank and order (arts. 2852-57). This gives rise to mortgage subrogation or succession.

A mortgage is extinguished by cancellation, failure to renew it, extinction of the principal obligation, destruction of the property, waiver by the creditor, expiration of the agreed period, or occurrence of the resolutory condition (art. 2878). If the claim is reduced or the value of the mortgaged asset increases, the mortgage may be reduced, provided that the asset permits this (art. 2872 ff.).

III. THE MORTGAGE IN CANON LAW

Apart from natural law and express exceptions, the CIC refers contracts to civil law (can. 1529); this therefore also applies to matters concerning mortgages. The following, in summary, is what the CIC expressly provides concerning mortgages. To safeguard the goods of the Church against the holder or administrator, the CIC provides that a mortgage may not be established except in the case of alienable property, for a just and proportionate reason, with authorization in accordance with can. 1532, following the judgment of experts, after those concerned have been heard and the forms prescribed by civil law have been observed. The superior, if authorized, may establish an annual sum for amortizing the mortgage (cann. 1538, 1529–33).

IV. SOME MORAL QUESTIONS

1) Civil laws in this matter have moral obligatoriness (cf. can. 1529; M. Serafino a Lojano, Institutiones theol. moralis, III, Torino 1938, no. 258). 2) The debtor and the third-party possessor incur injustice through negligence concerning the mortgaged property, so that, diminished in value, it becomes insufficient to pay the creditors (cf. A. Ballerini-D. Palmieri, Opus theol. morale, III, Torino-Roma 1899, no. 947); and through fraudulently concealing, at the time of constitution, other real charges and exaggerating the price of property of little value. 3) The creditor sins against justice by imposing extralegal usurious conditions and refusing amortization of the debt; and, in the event of a forced sale, by preventing the sale on favorable terms. 4) If two persons establish the mortgage privately, even with witnesses, in order to avoid expenses or inconvenience, the creditor may not claim the rights of preference granted directly by positive law; by natural law, on the other hand, only relatives and the poor have preference. 5) Regarding the rank and order established by law among the various mortgage creditors, an obligation in conscience arises after the judge’s sentence; before the sentence, according to s. Alfonso, preference must be given to the person who directly contributed to restoring the mortgaged property; opinions vary regarding the other creditors: some require that the amount be divided pro rata in conscience, some would give preference to the poorest, and some to the first registered. It should be observed that, in the Saint’s time, the mortgage was governed by Roman law, which lacked the civil formalities. Since civil law has now specified the uncertain content of natural law, it creates a moral obligation, at least because only in this way is juridical protection obtained (s. Alfonso, Theol. moralis, I. III, tract. V, no. 690 ff., ed. L. Gaudé, II, Roma 1907, p. 157 ff.).

BIBL.: Among the moralists, some have been cited in the body of the article: all discuss it in de contractibus. Among the civil-law scholars: A. Ascoli, Le origini dell'i. e l'interdetto Salciano, Livorno 1887; L. Coviello, Delle i., Napoli 1928; E. Albertario-V. Porri, s. v., in Enc. Ital., XIX, pp. 406-501; A. Trabucchi, Istituzioni di diritto civile, 5ª ed., Padova 1950, pp. 550 ff. Among the canonists V. the various commentators on the Code, for example: M. Conte a Coronata, Instituciones iuris canonici, II, Torino 1931, nos. 1069-75; A. Vermeersch-I. Creusen, Epitome iuris canonici, II, 5ª ed., Malines-Roma 1934, nos. 849-59. And furthermore: S. Goyenèche, Constitutio hypothéicoe in actu emptionis, in Commentarium pro religiosis et mission., 26 (1947), pp. 234-36. Sisinio da Romallo
Cite this article

“IPOTECA.” Enciclopedia Cattolica, vol. VII (1951), p. 120. Azione Romana digital edition, https://azioneromana.com/article/ipoteca.