Letters305 Letter CCCV. To pope Eugenius (A.D. 1153)
Letter CCCV. To pope Eugenius (A.D. 1153)
Bernard recommends to the Pope the cause of the Bishop of Beauvais, who is detained by fust causes from travelling to Rome.
The Bishop of Beauvais, your son (whom I might also call mine if it were not presumption on my part thus to speak), having been summoned to your presence, would have come willingly, being strong in the justice of his cause, and confiding in your fatherly favour. But I have detained him, and have had much difficulty in so doing, so desirous was he to see your face. What made me wish to keep him back was chiefly (among other good reasons) that I was doubtful \vhat was your wish in respect of him. Besides, without speaking of many other considerations which opposed themselves to his departure, he and his brother, the King, do not walk together in one mind, and it would not be altogether safe for him to be long absent from his diocese. Do not ask me on which side is the v.-rong: it is not for me to bring a charge against anyone; it is sufficient for me to excuse the Bishop. I have seen him in the King's presence, showing to him every mark of submission and respect, and that to no purpose. However, you may be sure that whatever he may have to fear and whatever may happen in his absence, he will come to you without delay whenever he shall have learned that you desire him to do so. His person and his interests are in your hands. Nor has he so acted in the post committed to him that he should not be able to count on your goodwill. Therefore he has sent this person in his place, well knowing that he might act towards you as towards a father. Would it please you to know what orders have been given to him? To do nothing without your direction, and to follow in all respects your wishes, to which he wholly commits himself. And he is confident that you will do better for him than act merely as his judge, but that you will be his support, his strength, and his protector. If it should please you to commit the cause to the judgment of the Lord Archbishop of Rheims, I believe it would be speedily terminated with the help of God, especially if the right of Appeal was taken away from each party.
Filius vester ille Belvacensis (quem dicerem et nostrum, nisi insolentiam redoleret) appellatus ad vestram praesentiam veniebat, et libens, utpote de sua justitia securus, et de vestro paterno favore non dubius. Sed obstiti ego, et vix eum potui retinere, quippe cupidum videndi faciem vestram. Quod autem retinere volui, cum multae occurrerent causae, illud praecipuum fuit, quod de vestra dubitavimus voluntate. Deinde praeter alias incommoditates non paucas, quae obviare viderentur, ipse et frater suus Rex non ambulant in uno spiritu, et non erat satis tutum diu absentari a suis. Nolo a me quaeratis cujus sit culpa: non est meum inculpare quemquam. Sufficit mihi excusare episcopum. Quidquid humilitatis, quidquid obsequii pro sua persona potuit, vidimus exhibentem, et nihil proficientem. Scitote tamen, quidquid timeat, quidquid accidere debeat, sine mora venturum, ubi vobis placiturum cognoverit Persona ejus, et causa ejus in manu vestra. Nec enim in sibi credito ita agit, vel ita conversatur, ut se tali indignum putet praerogativa. Itaque prosse direxit istum, sciens quod ad patrem dirigeret. Scire placet quid injunctum sit ei? Nihil ex injuncto agere, sed totum committere vestro consilio, de quo totus pendet ipse. Nempe fiduciam habet, non modo judicari causam suam a vobis, sed juvari, sed foveri, sed manuteneri. Si placet eam committere domino Remensi archiepiscopo, maturum posse sortiri finem Domino auxiliante confidimus, si tamen appellandi suffugium parti utrique subtrahatur.