Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 58

sant'Agostino d'Ippona (354–430 d.C.) · In Joannis evangelium tractatus CXXIV · PL 35, 1379–1976

58.1 Chapter XIII. 10–15 PL 35, 1792

1. We have already, beloved, as the Lord was pleased to enable us, expounded to you those words of the Gospel, where the Lord, in washing His disciples’ feet, says, “He that is once washed needeth not save to wash his feet, but is clean every whit.” Let us now look at what follows. “And ye,” He says, “are clean, but not all.” And to remove the need of inquiry on our part, the evangelist has himself explained its meaning, by adding: “For He knew who it was that should betray Him; therefore said He, Ye are not all clean.” Can anything be clearer? Let us therefore pass to what follows.

Jam illa verba Evangelii, ubi Dominus lavans pedes discipulis suis, ait, Qui lotus est semel, non habet necessitatem nisi pedes lavare, sed est mundus totus , Dilectioni vestrae, ut Dominus donare dignatus est, exposuimus: nunc quod sequitur videamus. Et vos, inquit, mundi estis, sed non omnes. Hoc quid sit ne quaereremus, ipse Evangelista patefecit, adjungens: Sciebat enim quisnam esset qui traderet eum; propterea dixi: Non estis mundi omnes. Quid hoc apertius? Proinde ad sequentia transeamus.

58.2 PL 35, 1793

2. “So, after He had washed their feet, and had taken His garments, and was set down again, He said unto them, Know ye what I have done to you?” Now it is that the blessed Peter gets that promise fulfilled: for he had been put off when, in the midst of his trembling and asserting, “Thou shalt never wash my feet,” he received the answer, “What I do, thou knowest not now, but thou shalt know hereafter” (vers. 7, 8). Here, then, is that very hereafter; it is now time to tell what was a little ago deferred. Accordingly, the Lord, mindful of His foregoing promise to make him understand an act of His so unexpected, so wonderful, so frightening, and, but for His own still more terrifying rejoinder, impossible to be permitted, that the Master not only of themselves, but of angels, and the Lord not only of them, but of all things, should wash the feet of His own disciples and servants: having then promised to let him know the meaning of so important an act, when He said, “Thou shalt know afterwards,” begins now to show them what it was that He did.

Postquam ergo lavit pedes eorum, et accepit vestimenta sua; cum recubuisset iterum, dixit eis: Scitis quid fecerim vobis? Nunc est ut beato Petro reddatur illa promissio: dilatus enim fuerat, quando expavescenti, et dicenti, Non lavabis mihi pedes in aeternum, responsum est ei, Quod ego facio, tu nescis modo, scies autem postea . Ecce est ipsum postea; jam tempus est ut dicatur quod paulo ante dilatum est. Memor itaque Dominus se promisisse jam dudum scientiam facti sui tam inopinati, tam mirabilis, tam expavescendi, et nisi ipse vehementer terruisset, nullo modo sinendi, ut magister non tantum ipsorum, sed Angelorum, et Dominus non tantum ipsorum, sed rerum omnium, lavaret pedes discipulorum et servorum suorum: hujus ergo tanti facti quoniam promiserat scientiam dicens, Scies autem postea; quid sit quod fecit, docere nunc incipit.

58.3 PL 35, 1793

3. “Ye call me,” He says, “Master and Lord: and ye say well; for so I am.” “Ye say well,” for ye only say the truth; I am indeed what ye say. There is a precept laid on man: “Let not thine own mouth praise thee, but the mouth of thy neighbor.” For self-pleasing is a perilous thing for one who has to be on his guard against falling into pride. But He who is over all things, however much He commend Himself, cannot exalt Himself above His actual dignity: nor can God be rightly termed arrogant. For it is to our advantage to know Him, not to His; nor can any one know Him, unless that self-knowing One make Himself known. If He, then, by abstaining from self-commendation, wish, as it were, to avoid arrogance, He will deny us the power of knowing Him. And no one surely would blame Him for calling Himself Master, even though believing Him to be nothing more than a man; seeing He only makes profession of what even men themselves in the various arts profess to such an extent, without any charge of arrogance, that they are termed professors. But to call Himself also the Lord of His disciples,—of men who, in an earthly sense, were themselves also free-born,—who would tolerate it in a man? But it is God that speaks. Here no elation is possible to loftiness so great, no lie to the truth: the profit is ours to be the subjects of such loftiness, the servants of the truth. That He calls Himself Lord is no imperfection on His side, but a benefit on ours. The words of a certain profane author are commended, when he says, “All arrogance is hateful, and specially disagreeable is that of talent and eloquence;” and yet, when the same person was speaking of his own eloquence, he said, “I would call it perfect, were I to pronounce judgment; nor, in truth, would I greatly fear the charge of arrogance.” If, then, that most eloquent man had in truth no fear of being charged with arrogance, how can the truth itself have such a fear? Let Him call Himself Lord who is the Lord, let Him say what is true who is the Truth; so that I may not fail to learn that which is profitable, by His being silent about that which is. The most blessed Paul—certainly not himself the only-begotten Son of God, but the servant and apostle of that Son; not the Truth, but a partaker of the truth—declares with freedom and consistency, “And though I would desire to glory, I shall not be a fool; for I say the truth.” For it would not be in himself, but in the truth, which is superior to himself, that he was glorying both humbly and truly: for it is he also who has given the charge, that he that glorieth should glory in the Lord. Could thus the lover of wisdom have no fear of being chargeable with foolishness, though he desired to glory, and would wisdom itself, in its glorying, have any fear of such a charge? He had no fear of arrogance who said, “My soul shall make her boast in the Lord;” and could the power of the Lord have any such fear in commending itself, in which His servant’s soul is making her boast? “Ye call me,” He says, “Master and Lord: and ye say well; for so I am.” Therefore ye say well, that I am so: for if I were not what ye say, ye would be wrong to say so, even with the purpose of praising me. How, then, could the Truth deny what the disciples of the Truth affirm? How could that which was said by the learners be denied by the very Truth that gave them their learning? How can the fountain deny what the drinker asserts? how can the light hide what the beholder declares?

Vos, inquit, vocatis me, Magister, et Domine: et bene dicitis; sum etenim. Bene dicitis, quia verum dicitis; sum quippe quod dicitis. Homini praeceptum est, Non te laudet os tuum, sed laudet te os proximi tui . Periculosum est enim sibi placere, cui cavendum est superbire. Ille autem qui super omnia est, quantumcumque se laudet, non se extollit excelsus: nec potest recte dici arrogans Deus. Nobis namque expedit eum nosse, non illi: nec eum quisque cognoscit, si non se indicet ipse qui novit. Si ergo non se laudando quasi arrogantiam vitare voluerit, nobis sapientiam denegabit. Et magistrum quidem quod se esse dicit, nemo reprehenderet, etiam qui eum nihil esse aliud quam hominem crederet; quoniam id profitetur quod et ipsi homines in quibuslibet artibus usque adeo sine arrogantia profitentur, ut professores vocentur. Quod vero dominum et ipse se dicit discipulorum suorum, cum sint illi etiam secundum saeculum ingenui, quis ferat in homine? Sed Deus loquitur. Nulla est hic elatio tantae celsitudinis, nullum mendacium veritatis: nobis subjacere illi utile est celsitudini, nobis servire utile est veritati. Quod se Dominum dicit, non illi vitium est, sed nobis beneficium. Cujusdam saecularis auctoris verba laudantur, quia dixit, « Cum omnis arrogantia odiosa est, « tum illa ingenii et eloquentiae multo molestissima » : et tamen idem ipse cum de sua eloquentia loqueretur, « Dicerem, inquit, perfectam, si ita judicarem; nec in veritate crimen arrogantiae pertimescerem » . Si igitur ille homo eloquentissimus in veritate arrogantiam non timeret, quomodo arrogantiam ipsa veritas timet? Dicat se Dominum qui Dominus est, dicat verum qui veritas est; ne non discam ego quod utile est, dum tacet ille quod est. Beatissimus Paulus, non utique unigenitus Dei Filius, sed unigeniti Dei Filii servus et apostolus; non veritas, sed particeps veritatis; ait libere et constanter, Et si voluero gloriari, non ero insipiens; veritatem enim dico . Neque enim in seipso, sed in ipsa veritate quae superior est ipso, et humiliter et veraciter gloriaretur: quoniam et ipse praecepit ut qui gloriatur in Domino glorietur . Itane non timeret insipientiam, si gloriari vellet amator sapientiae; et in gloria sua timeret insipientiam ipsa sapientia? Non timuit arrogantiam qui dixit, In Domino laudabitur anima mea ; et in laude sua timeret arrogantiam potestas Domini, in qua laudatur anima servi? Vos, inquit, vocatis me, Magister, et Domine: et bene dicitis; sum etenim. Ideo bene dicitis, quia sum: nam si non essem quod dicitis, male diceretis, etiamsi me laudaretis. Quomodo ergo negaret veritas, quod dicunt discipuli veritatis? quomodo quod dicunt qui didicerunt, negaret ipsa unde didicerunt? Quomodo fons negat quod bibens praedicat? quomodo lux occultat quod videns indicat?

58.4 PL 35, 1794

4. “If I, then,” He says, “your Lord and Master, have washed your feet, ye also ought to wash one another’s feet. For I have given you an example, that ye should do as I have done to you.” This, blessed Peter, is what thou didst not know when thou wert not allowing it to be done. This is what He promised to let thee know afterwards, when thy Master and thy Lord terrified thee into submission, and washed thy feet. We have learned, brethren, humility from the Highest; let us, as humble, do to one another what He, the Highest, did in His humility. Great is the commendation we have here of humility: and brethren do this to one another in turn, even in the visible act itself, when they treat one another with hospitality; for the practice of such humility is generally prevalent, and finds expression in the very deed that makes it discernible. And hence the apostle, when he would commend the well-deserving widow, says, “If she is hospitable, if she has washed the saints’ feet.” And wherever such is not the practice among the saints, what they do not with the hand they do in heart, if they are of the number of those who are addressed in the hymn of the three blessed men, “O ye holy and humble of heart, bless ye the Lord.” But it is far better, and beyond all dispute more accordant with the truth, that it should also be done with the hands; nor should the Christian think it beneath him to do what was done by Christ. For when the body is bent at a brother’s feet, the feeling of such humility is either awakened in the heart itself, or is strengthened if already present.

« Si ergo, inquit, ego lavi pedes vestros Dominus et Magister, debetis et vos alter alterius lavare pedes. Exemplum enim dedi vobis, ut quemadmodum ego feci vobis, et vos ita faciatis. » Hoc est, beate Petre, quod nesciebas, quando fieri non sinebas. Hoc tibi postea sciendum promisit, quando ut sineres terruit te Magister tuus et Dominus tuus, lavans pedes tuos. Didicimus, fratres, humilitatem ab Excelso; faciamus invicem humiles, quod humiliter fecit Excelsus. Magna est haec commendatio humilitatis: et faciunt sibi hoc invicem fratres, etiam opere ipso visibili, cum se invicem hospitio recipiunt; est enim apud plerosque consuetudo hujus humilitatis, usque ad factum quo cernatur expressa. Unde Apostolus cum viduam bene meritam commendaret, Si hospitio, inquit, recepit, si sanctorum pedes lavit . Et apud sanctos ubicumque haec consuetudo non est, quod manu non faciunt, corde faciunt, si in illorum numero sunt quibus dicitur in hymno beatorum trium virorum, Benedicite, sancti et humiles corde, Domino . Multo autem est melius, et sine controversia verius, ut etiam manibus fiat; nec dedignetur quod fecit Christus, facere christianus. Cum enim ad pedes fratris inclinatur corpus, etiam in corde ipso vel excitatur, vel si jam inerat, confirmatur ipsius humilitatis affectus.

58.5 PL 35, 1794

5. But apart from this moral understanding of the passage, we remember that the way in which we commended to your attention the grandeur of this act of the Lord’s, was that, in washing the feet of disciples who were already washed and clean, the Lord instituted a sign, to the end that, on account of the human feelings that occupy us on earth, however far we may have advanced in our apprehension of righteousness, we might know that we are not exempt from sin; which He thereafter washes away by interceding for us, when we pray the Father, who is in heaven, to forgive us our debts, as we also forgive our debtors. What connection, then, can such an understanding of the passage have with that which He afterwards gave Himself, when He explained the reason of His act in the words, “If I then, your Lord and Master, have washed your feet, ye also ought to wash one another’s feet. For I have given you an example, that ye should do as I have done to you”? Can we say that even a brother may cleanse a brother from the contracted stain of wrongdoing? Yea, verily, we know that of this also we were admonished in the profound significance of this work of the Lord’s, that we should confess our faults one to another, and pray for one another, even as Christ also maketh intercession for us. Let us listen to the Apostle James, who states this precept with the greatest clearness when he says, “Confess your faults one to another, and pray one for another.” For of this also the Lord gave us the example. For if He who neither has, nor had, nor will have any sin, prays for our sins, how much more ought we to pray for one another’s in turn! And if He forgives us, whom we have nothing to forgive; how much more ought we, who are unable to live here without sin, to forgive one another! For what else does the Lord apparently intimate in the profound significance of this sacramental sign, when He says, “For I have given you an example, that ye should do as I have done to you;” but what the apostle declares in the plainest terms, “Forgiving one another, if any man have a quarrel against any: even as Christ forgave you, so also do ye”? Let us therefore forgive one another his faults, and pray for one another’s faults, and thus in a manner be washing one another’s feet. It is our part, by His grace, to be supplying the service of love and humility: it is His to hear us, and to cleanse us from all the pollution of our sins through Christ, and in Christ; so that what we forgive even to others, that is, loose on earth, may be loosed in heaven.

Sed excepto isto morali intellectu, ita nos hujus dominici facti altitudinem commendasse meminimus, quod lavando pedes jam lotorum atque mundorum discipulorum, significaverit Dominus propter humanos quibus in terra versamur affectus, ut quamtumlibet profecerimus in apprehensione justitiae, sciamus nos sine peccato non esse: quod subinde abluit interpellando pro nobis, cum oramus Patrem qui in coelis est, ut debita nostra dimittat nobis, sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris . Quomodo ergo ad hunc intellectum poterit pertinere hoc quod ipse postea docuit, ubi sui facti exposuit rationem dicens, « Si ergo ego lavi vestros pedes Dominus et Magister, debetis et vos alter alterius lavare pedes. Exemplum enim dedi vobis, ut quemadmodum ego vobis feci, ita et vos faciatis! » Numquid dicere possumus quod etiam frater fratrem a delicti poterit contagione mundare? Imo vero id etiam nos esse admonitos in hujus dominici operis altitudine noverimus, ut confessi invicem delicta nostra oremus pro nobis, sicut et Christus interpellat pro nobis . Audiamus Apostolum Jacobum hoc ipsum evidentissime praecipientem et dicentem, Confitemini invicem delicta vestra, et orate pro vobis . Quia et ad hoc Dominus nobis dedit exemplum. Si enim ille qui ullum peccatum nec habet, nec habuit, nec habebit, orat pro peccatis nostris; quanto magis nos invicem pro nostris orare debemus? Et si dimittit nobis ille cui non habemus quod dimittamus; quanto magis dimittere nobis debemus invicem, qui sine peccato hic vivere non valemus? Quid enim videtur in hac altitudine sacramenti Dominus significare, cum dicit, « Exemplum enim dedi vobis, ut quemadmodum ego feci vobis; ita et vos faciatis; » nisi quod apertissime dicit Apostolus, « Donantes vobismetipsis, si quis adversus aliquem habet querelam, sicut et Dominus donavit vobis, ita et vos » ! Invicem itaque nobis delicta donemus, et pro nostris delictis invicem oremus, atque ita quodammodo invicem pedes nostros lavemus. Nostrum est, donante ipso, ministerium charitatis et humilitatis adhibere: illius est exaudire, ac nos ab omni peccatorum contaminatione mundare per Christum, et in Christo; ut quod aliis etiam dimittimus, hoc est in terra solvimus, solvatur in coelo.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Salva per dopo

Inserisci la tua email: ti invieremo un link per accedere. Nessuna password. Ciò che salvi (voci, versetti, capitoli, documenti) ti segue su ogni dispositivo.