Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 84

sant'Agostino d'Ippona (354–430 d.C.) · In Joannis evangelium tractatus CXXIV · PL 35, 1379–1976

84 Chapter XV. 13 PL 35, 1846

1. The Lord, beloved brethren, hath defined that fullness of love which we ought to bear to one another, when He said: “Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.” Inasmuch, then, as He had said before, “This is my commandment, that ye love one another, as I have loved you;” and appended to these words what you have just been hearing, “Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends;” there follows from this as a consequence, what this same Evangelist John says in his epistle, “That as Christ laid down His life for us, even so we also ought to lay down our lives for the brethren;” loving one another in truth, as He hath loved us, who laid down His life for us. Such also is doubtless the meaning of what we read in the Proverbs of Solomon: “If thou sittest down to supper at the table of a ruler, consider wisely what is set before thee; and so put to thy hand, knowing that thou art bound to make similar preparations.” For what is the table of the ruler, but that from which we take the body and blood of Him who laid down His life for us? And what is it to sit thereat, but to approach in humility? And what is it to consider intelligently what is set before thee, but worthily to reflect on the magnitude of the favor? And what is it, so to put to thy hand, as knowing that thou art bound to make similar preparations, but as I have already said, that, as Christ laid down His life for us, so we also ought to lay down our lives for the brethren? For as the Apostle Peter also says, “Christ suffered for us, leaving us an example, that we should follow His steps.” This is to make similar preparations. This it was that the blessed martyrs did in their burning love; and if we celebrate their memories in no mere empty form, and, in the banquet whereat they themselves were filled to the full, approach the table of the Lord, we must, as they did, be also ourselves making similar preparations. For on these very grounds we do not commemorate them at that table in the same way, as we do others who now rest in peace, as that we should also pray for them, but rather that they should do so for us, that we may cleave to their footsteps; because they have actually attained that fullness of love, than which, our Lord hath told us, there cannot be a greater. For such tokens of love they exhibited for their brethren, as they themselves had equally received at the table of the Lord.

2. But let us not be supposed to have so spoken as if on such grounds we might possibly arrive at an equality with Christ the Lord, if for His sake we have undergone witness-bearing even unto blood. He had power to lay down His life, and to take it again; but we have no power to live as long as we wish; and die we must, however unwilling: He, by dying, straightway slew death in Himself; we, by His death, are delivered from death: His flesh saw no corruption; ours, after corruption, shall in the end of the world be clothed by Him with incorruption: He had no need of us, in order to work out our salvation; we, without Him, can do nothing: He gave Himself as the vine, to us the branches; we, apart from Him, can have no life. Lastly, although brethren die for brethren, yet no martyr’s blood is ever shed for the remission of the sins of brethren, as was the case in what He did for us; and in this respect He bestowed not on us aught for imitation, but something for congratulation. In as far, then, as the martyrs have shed their blood for the brethren, so far have they exhibited such tokens of love as they themselves perceived at the table of the Lord. (One might imitate Him in dying, but no one could, in redeeming.) In all else, then, that I have said, although it is out of my power to mention everything, the martyr of Christ is far inferior to Christ Himself. But if any one shall set himself in comparison, I say, not with the power, but with the innocence of Christ, and (I would not say) in thinking that he is healing the sins of others, but at least that he has no sins of his own, even so far is his avidity overstepping the requirements of the method of salvation; it is a matter of considerable moment for him, only he attains not his desire. And well it is that he is admonished in that passage of the Proverbs, which immediately goes on to say, “But if thy greed is too great, be not desirous of his dainties; for it is better that thou take nothing thereof, than that thou shouldst take more than is befitting. For such things,” it is added, “have a life of deceit,” that is, of hypocrisy. For in asserting his own sinlessness, he cannot prove, but only pretend, that he is righteous. And so it is said, “For such have a deceiving life.” There is only One who could at once have human flesh and be free from sin. Appropriately are we commanded that which follows; and such a word and proverb is well adapted to human weakness, when it is said, “Lay not thyself out, seeing thou art poor, against him that is rich.” For the rich man is Christ, who was never obnoxious to punishment either through hereditary or personal debt and is righteous Himself, and justifies others. Lay not thyself out against Him, thou who art so poor, that thou art manifestly to the eyes of all the daily beggar that thou art in thy prayer for the remission of sins. “But keep thyself,” he says, “from thine own counsel” [“cease from thine own wisdom”—E.V.]. From what, but from this delusive presumption? For He, indeed, inasmuch as He is not only man but also God, can never be chargeable with evil. “For if thou turn thine eye upon Him, He will nowhere be visible.” “Thine eye,” that is, the human eye, wherewith thou distinguishest that which is human; “if thou turn it upon Him, He will nowhere be visible,” because He cannot be seen with such organs of sight as are thine. “For He will provide Himself wings like an eagle’s, and will depart to the house of His overseer,” from which, at all events, He came to us, and found us not such as He Himself was who came. Let us therefore love one another, even as Christ hath loved us, and given Himself for us. “For greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.” And let us be imitating Him in such a spirit of reverential obedience, that we shall never have the boldness to presume on a comparison between Him and ourselves.

Plenitudinem dilectionis qua nos invicem diligere debemus, fratres charissimi, definivit Dominus dicens: Majorem hac dilectionem nemo habet, ut animam suam ponat quis pro amicis suis. Quia ergo superius dixerat, Hoc est mandatum meum, ut diligatis invicem, sicut dilexi vos; quibus verbis addidit quod nunc audistis, Majorem hac dilectionem nemo habet, ut animam suam ponat quis pro amicis suis: fit ex hoc consequens, quod idem iste evangelista Joannes in Epistola sua dicit, Ut quemadmodum Christus pro nobis animam suam posuit, sic et nos debeamus pro fratribus animas ponere ; diligentes utique invicem sicut ipse dilexit nos, qui pro nobis animam suam posuit. Nimirum hoc est quod legitur in Proverbiis Salomonis: Si sederis coenare ad mensam potentis, considerans intellige quae apponuntur tibi; et sic mitte manum tuam, sciens quia talia te oportet praeparare . Nam quae mensa est potentis, nisi unde sumitur corpus et sanguis ejus qui animam suam posuit pro nobis? Et quid est ad eam sedere, nisi humiliter accedere? Et quid est considerare et intelligere quae apponuntur tibi, nisi digne tantam gratiam cogitare? Et quid est sic mittere manum, ut scias quia talia te oportet praeparare, nisi quod jam dixi, quia sicut pro nobis Christus animam suam posuit, sic et nos debemus animas pro fratribus ponere? Sicut enim ait etiam apostolus Petrus, Christus pro nobis passus est, relinquens nobis exemplum, ut sequamur vestigia ejus . Hoc est talia praeparare. Hoc beati martyres ardenti dilectione fecerunt: quorum si non inaniter memorias celebramus, atque in convivio quo et ipsi saturati sunt, ad mensam Domini accedimus, oportet, ut quemadmodum ipsi, et nos talia praeparemus. Ideo quippe ad ipsam mensam non sic eos commemoramus, quemadmodum alios qui in pace requiescunt, ut etiam pro eis oremus, sed magis ut ipsi pro nobis, ut eorum vestigiis adhaereamus; quia impleverunt ipsi charitatem qua Dominus dixit non posse esse majorem. Talia enim suis fratribus exhibuerunt, qualia de Domini mensa pariter acceperunt.

Neque hoc ita dictum sit, quasi propterea Domino Christo pares esse possimus, si pro illo usque ad sanguinem martyrium duxerimus. Ille potestatem habuit ponendi animam suam, et iterum sumendi eam ; nos autem nec quantum volumus vivimus, et morimur etiamsi nolumus: ille moriens mox in se occidit mortem; nos in ejus morte liberamur a morte: illius caro non vidit corruptionem ; nostra post corruptionem, in fine saeculi per illum induetur incorruptionem: ille nobis non indiguit ut nos salvos faceret; nos sine illo nihil possumus facere: ille se nobis palmitibus praebuet vitem; nos habere praeter illum non possumus vitam. Postremo etsi fratres pro fratribus moriantur, tamen in fraternorum peccatorum remissionem nullius sanguis martyris funditur, quod fecit ille pro nobis: neque in hoc quid imitaremur, sed quid gratularemur contulit nobis. Quatenus ergo martyres pro fratribus sanguinem suum fuderunt, hactenus talia exhibuerunt, qualia de mensa dominica perceperunt. In caeteris enim quae dixi, quamvis nec omnia dicere potui, martyr Christi longe impar est Christo Quod si quisquam se, non dico potentiae Christi, sed innocentiae comparabit; non dicam et alienum se putando sanare, sed suum saltem nullum habere peccatum: etiam sic avidior est quam ratio salutis exposcit, multum est ad ilium, non capit tantum. Et bene quod ista Proverbiorum sententia commonetur, quae continuo subjungit atque dicit, Quod si avidior es, noli concupiscere cibos ejus; satius est enim ut nihil inde sumas, quam ut tibi plus quam oportet assumas. Haec enim, inquit, vitam habent fallacem, hoc est hypocrisim. Dicendo enim se sine peccato esse, justum non potest exhibere, sed fingere Ideo dictum est, Haec enim habent vitam fallacem. Unus est solus qui et carnem hominis habere, et peccatum potuit non habere. Merito quod sequitur, nobis praecipitur, ac tali verbo atque proverbio humana infirmitas convenitur, eique dicitur: Noli extendere te, cum sis pauper, contra divitem. Dives est enim qui nec haereditario nec proprio unquam debito obnoxius, et ipse justus est, et alios justificat Christus. Noli contra eum te extendere, in tantum pauper, ut remissionis peccatorum appareas quotidianus in oratione mendicus. Tuo autem consilio, inquit, abstine te. Unde, nisi a praesumptione fallaci? Ille quippe quia non tantum est homo, sed etiam Deus, ideo nunquam reus. Si enim direxeris oculum tuum ad illum, nusquam parebit Oculum tuum, oculum videlicet humanum quo cernis humana, si direxeris ad illum, nusquam parebit; quia videri non potest, quemadmodum videre tu potes. Parabit enim sibi pennas sicut aquilae, et vadet in domum praepositi sui : unde ad nos utique venit, nec tales qualis venit invenit. Diligamus ergo invicem, sicut et Christus dilexit nos, et tradidit semetipsum pro nobis . Majorem quippe hac dilectionem nemo habet, ut animam suam ponat quis pro amicis suis. Eumque sic imitemur pia obedientia, ut ei nos comparare nulla praesumamus audacia.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Salva per dopo

Inserisci la tua email: ti invieremo un link per accedere. Nessuna password. Ciò che salvi (voci, versetti, capitoli, documenti) ti segue su ogni dispositivo.