The Enchiridion 19

St Augustine of Hippo (AD 354–430) · De fide spe et charitate · PL 40, 230–290

19 Men’s Errors Vary Very Much in the Magnitude of the Evils They Produce; But Yet Every Error is in Itself an Evil PL 40, 241

In some things, then, it is a great evil to be deceived; in some it is a small evil; in some no evil at all; and in some it is an actual advantage. It is to his grievous injury that a man is deceived when he does not believe what leads to eternal life, or believes what leads to eternal death. It is a small evil for a man to be deceived, when, by taking falsehood for truth, he brings upon himself temporal annoyances; for the patience of the believer will turn even these to a good use, as when, for example, taking a bad man for a good, he receives injury from him. But one who believes a bad man to be good, and yet suffers no injury, is nothing the worse for being deceived, nor does he fall under the prophetic denunciation: “Woe to those who call evil good!” For we are to understand that this is spoken not about evil men, but about the things that make men evil. Hence the man who calls adultery good, falls justly under that prophetic denunciation. But the man who calls the adulterer good, thinking him to be chaste, and not knowing him to be an adulterer, falls into no error in regard to the nature of good and evil, but only makes a mistake as to the secrets of human conduct. He calls the man good on the ground of believing him to be what is undoubtedly good; he calls the adulterer evil, and the pure man good; and he calls this man good, not knowing him to be an adulterer, but believing him to be pure. Further, if by making a mistake one escape death, as I have said above once happened to me, one even derives some advantage from one’s mistake. But when I assert that in certain cases a man may be deceived without any injury to himself, or even with some advantage to himself, I do not mean that the mistake in itself is no evil, or is in any sense a good; I refer only to the evil that is avoided, or the advantage that is gained, through making the mistake. For the mistake, considered in itself, is an evil: a great evil if it concern a great matter, a small evil if it concern a small matter, but yet always an evil. For who that is of sound mind can deny that it is an evil to receive what is false as if it were true, and to reject what is true as if it were false, or to hold what is uncertain as certain, and what is certain as uncertain? But it is one thing to think a man good when he is really bad, which is a mistake; it is another thing to suffer no ulterior injury in consequence of the mistake, supposing that the bad man whom we think good inflicts no damage upon us. In the same way, it is one thing to think that we are on the right road when we are not; it is another thing when this mistake of ours, which is an evil, leads to some good, such as saving us from an ambush of wicked men.

Error alius quidem alio perniciosior, sed semper est malus. In quibusdam ergo rebus magno, in quibusdam parvo, in quibusdam nullo malo, in quibusdam nonnullo etiam bono fallimur. Nam magno malo fallitur homo, cum hoc non credit quod ad vitam ducit aeternam, vel hoc credit quod ad mortem ducit aeternam. Parvo autem malo fallitur, qui falsum pro vero approbando incidit in aliquas molestias temporales, quibus tamen adhibita fidelis patientia convertit eas in usum bonum. Velut si quisquam bonum hominem putando qui malus est, aliquid ab eo patiatur mali. Qui vero malum hominem ita bonum credit, ut nihil ab eo patiatur mali, nullo malo fallitur: nec in eum cadit illa prophetica detestatio, Vae iis qui dicunt quod malum est bonum. De ipsis enim rebus quibus homines mali sunt, non de hominibus dictum intelligendum est. Unde qui adulterium dicit bonum, recte arguitur illa voce prophetica. Qui vero ipsum hominem dicit bonum, quem putat castum, nescit adulterum, non in doctrina rerum bonarum et malarum, sed in occultis humanorum fallitur morum; vocans hominem bonum, in quo putat esse quod esse non dubitat bonum, et dicens malum adulterum et bonum castum: sed hunc bonum dicens, nesciendo adulterum esse, non castum. Porro si per errorem evadit quisque perniciem, sicut superius dixi nobis in itinere contigisse, etiam boni aliquid homini errore confertur. Sed cum dico in quibusdam rebus nullo malo aliquem, vel nonnullo etiam bono falli; non ipsum errorem dico nullum malum vel nonnullum bonum; sed malum quo non venitur, vel bonum quo venitur errando, id est, ex ipso errore quid non eveniat vel quid proveniat. Nam ipse per se ipsum error aut magnum in re magna, aut parvum in re parva, tamen semper est malum. Quis enim nisi errans malum neget, approbare falsa pro veris aut improbare vera pro falsis, aut habere incerta pro certis, vel certa pro incertis? Sed aliud est bonum hominem putare qui malus est, quod est erroris; et aliud est ex hoc malo aliud malum non pati, si nihil noceat homo malus, qui est putatus bonus. Itemque aliud est ipsam viam putare, quae non est ipsa; et aliud est ex hoc erroris malo aliquid boni consequi, velut est ab insidiis malorum hominum liberari.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Save for later

Enter your email and we will send you a sign-in link. No password. What you save (articles, verses, chapters, documents) follows you to any device.