Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 54
54.1 Chapter XII. 44–50 PL 35, 1780
1. Whilst our Lord Jesus Christ was speaking among the Jews, and giving so many miraculous signs, some believed who were foreordained to eternal life, and whom He also called His sheep; but some did not believe, and could not believe, because that, by the mysterious yet not unrighteous judgment of God, they had been blinded and hardened, because forsaken of Him who resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble. But of those who believed, there were some whose confession went so far, that they took branches of palm trees, and met Him as He approached, turning in their joy that very confession into a service of praise: while there were others, belonging to the chief rulers, who had not the boldness to confess their faith, lest they should be put out of the synagogue; and whom the evangelist has branded with the words, that “they loved the praise of men more than the praise of God “(ver. 43). Of those also who did not believe, there were some who would afterwards believe, and whom He foresaw, when He said, “When ye have lifted up the Son of man, then shall ye acknowledge that I am He:” but there were some who would remain in the same unbelief, and be imitated by the Jewish nation of the present day, which, being shortly afterwards crushed in war, according to the prophetic testimony which was written concerning Christ, has since been scattered almost through the whole world.
Loquente Domino nostro Jesu Christo apud Judaeos, et tanta miraculorum signa faciente, quidam crediderunt praedestinati in vitam aeternam, quos etiam vocavit oves suas: quidam vero non crediderunt, nec poterant credere, eo quod occulto, nec tamen injusto judicio Dei fuerant excaecati et indurati, deserente illo qui superbis resistit, humilibus autem dat gratiam . Eorum autem qui crediderunt, alii usque adeo confitebantur, ut palmarum ramis acceptis venienti occurrerent, in eadem laudis confessione laetantes: alii vero ex principibus non audebant confiteri, ut de synagoga non ejicerentur; quos notavit Evangelista dicens, quod dilexerunt gloriam hominum magis quam gloriam Dei . Eorum etiam qui non crediderunt, alii erant postea credituri, quos praevidebat, ubi ait, Cum exaltaveritis Filium hominis, tunc agnoscetis quia ego sum : alii vero in eadem infidelitate mansuri, quorum imitatrix est etiam ista gens Judaeorum, quae postmodum debellata, ad testimonium prophetiae quae de Christo scripta est, in toto pene orbe dispersa est.
54.2 PL 35, 1780
2. While matters were in this state, and His own passion was now at hand, “Jesus cried, and said,” as our lesson to-day commences, “He that believeth on me, believeth not on me, but on Him that sent me; and he that seeth me, seeth Him that sent me.” He had already said in a certain place, “My doctrine is not mine, but His that sent me.” Where we understood that He called His doctrine just what He is Himself, the Word of the Father; and in saying, “My doctrine is not mine, but His that sent me,” implied this, that He was not of Himself, but had His being from another. For He was God of God, the Son of the Father: but the Father is not God of God, but God, the Father of the Son. And now when He says, “He that believeth on me, believeth not on me, but on Him that sent me,” how else are we to understand it, but that He appeared as man to men, while He remained invisible as God? And that none might think that He was no more than what they saw of Him, He indicated His wish to be believed on, as equal in character and rank with the Father, when He said, “He that believeth on me, believeth not on me,” that is, merely on what he seeth of me, “but on Him that sent me,” that is, on the Father. But he that believeth on the Father, must believe that He is the Father; and he that believeth on Him as the Father, must believe that He has a Son; and in this way, he that believeth on the Father, must believe on the Son. But let no one believe about the only-begotten Son just what they believe about those who are called the sons of God by grace and not by nature, as the evangelist says, “He gave them power to become the sons of God,” and according to what the Lord Himself also mentioned, as declared in the law, “I said, Ye are gods; and all of you children of the Most High:” because He said, “He that believeth on me, believeth not on me,” to show that the whole extent of our faith in Christ should not be limited by His manhood. He therefore, He saith, believeth on me, who doth not believe on me merely according to what he seeth of me, but on Him that sent me: so that, believing thus on the Father, he may believe that He has a Son co-equal with Himself, and then attain to a true faith in me. For if one should think that He has sons only according to grace, who are certainly no more than His creatures, and not the Word, but those made by the Word, and that He has no Son co-equal and co-eternal with Himself, ever born, alike incommutable, in nothing dissimilar and inferior, then he believes not on the Father who sent Him, for the Father who sent Him is no such conception as this.
His ita se habentibus, et sua jam propinquante passione, Jesus clamavit, et dixit; unde lectio coepit hodierna: Qui credit in me, non credit in me, sed in eum qui misit me: et qui videt me, videt eum qui misit me. Jam dixerat quodam loco: Mea doctrina non est mea, sed ejus qui misit me . Ubi intelleximus eum doctrinam suam dixisse Verbum Patris quod est ipse; et hoc significasse dicendo, Mea doctrina non est mea, sed ejus qui me misit, quod a seipso ipse non esset, sed haberet a quo esset . Deus enim de Deo, Filius Patris: Pater autem non Deus de Deo, sed Deus Pater Filii. Nunc autem quod ait, Qui credit in me, non credit in me, sed in eum qui misit me, quomodo intellecturi sumus, nisi quia homo apparebat hominibus, cum lateret Deus? Et ne putarent hoc eum esse tantummodo quod videbant, talem ac tantum se volens credi, qualis et quantus est Pater, Qui credit in me, inquit, non credit in me, id est, in hoc quod videt; sed in eum qui misit me, id est, in Patrem. Sed qui credit in Patrem, necesse est eum credat esse Patrem; qui autem credit eum Patrem, necesse est ut credat eum habere Filium: ac per hoc qui credit in Patrem, necesse est ut credat in Filium. Sed ne quisquam hoc credat de unigenito Filio, quod de iis qui dicti sunt filii Dei secundum gratiam, non naturam, sicut ait Evangelista, Dedit eis potestatem filios Dei fieri ; unde et illud est quod ipse Dominus commemoravit in Lege dictum, Ego dixi, Dii estis, et filii excelsi omnes : propterea dixit, Qui credit in me, non credit in me; ne totum quod de Christo creditur, secundum hominem crederetur. Ille ergo, inquit, credit in me, qui non credit in me secundum id quod me videt, sed in eum qui me misit: ut cum credit in Patrem, credat eum habere Filium sibi aequalem, et tunc vere credat in me. Nam si putaverit eum non habere nisi filios secundum gratiam, qui sunt ejus utique creatura, non Verbum, sed facta per Verbum, nec habere Filium aequalem sibi atque coaeternum, semper natum, pariter incommutabilem, ex nullo dissimilem atque imparem; non credit in Patrem qui eum misit, quia non est hoc Pater qui eum misit.
54.3 PL 35, 1781
3. And, accordingly, after saying, “He that believeth on me, believeth not on me, but on Him that sent me,” that it might not be thought that He would have the Father so understood, as if He were the Father only of many sons regenerated by grace, and not of the only-begotten Word, His own co-equal, He immediately added, “And he that seeth me, seeth Him that sent me.” Does He say here, He that seeth me, seeth not me, but Him that sent me, as He had said, “He that believeth me, believeth not on me, but on Him that sent me”? For He uttered the former of these words, that He might not be believed on merely as He then appeared, that is, as the Son of man; and the latter, that He might be believed on as the equal of the Father. He that believeth on me, believeth not merely on what He sees of me, but believeth on Him that sent me. Or, when he believeth on the Father, who begat me, His own co-equal, let him believe on me, not as he seeth me, but as [he believeth] on Him that sent me; for so far does the truth, that there is no distance between Him and me, reach, that He who seeth me, seeth Him that sent me. Certainly, Christ the Lord Himself sent His apostles, as their name implies: for as those who in Greek are called angeli are in Latin called nuntii [messengers], so the Greek apostoli [apostles] becomes the Latin missi [persons sent]. But never would any of the apostles have dared to say, “He that believeth on me, believeth not on me, but on Him that sent me;” for in no sense whatever would he say, “He that believeth on me.” We believe an apostle, but we do not believe on him; for it is not an apostle that justifieth the ungodly. But to him that believeth on Him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness. An apostle might say, He that receiveth me, receiveth Him that sent me; or, He that heareth me, heareth Him that sent me; for the Lord tells them so Himself: “He that receiveth you, receiveth me; and he that receiveth me, receiveth Him that sent me.” For the master is honored in the servant, and the father in the son: but then the father is as it were in the son, and the master as it were in the servant. But the only-begotten Son could rightly say, “Believe on God, and believe on me;” as also what He saith here, “He that believeth on me, believeth not on me, but on Him that sent me.” He did not turn away the faith of the believer from Himself, but only would not have the believer continue in the form of a servant: because every one who believeth in the Father that sent Him, straightway believeth on the Son, without whom he knoweth that the Father hath no existence as such, and thus reacheth in his faith to the belief of His equality with the Father, in conformity with the words that follow, “And he that seeth me, seeth Him that sent me.”
Et ideo cum dixisset, Qui credit in me, non credit in me, sed in eum qui misit me; ne putaretur sic voluisse Patrem intelligi tanquam Patrem multorum filiorum per gratiam regeneratorum, non unici Verbi aequalis sibi, continuo subjecit, Et qui videt me, videt eum qui misit me. Numquid ait, Qui videt me, non videt me, sed eum qui misit me; sicut dixerat, Qui credit in me, non credit in me, sed in eum qui misit me? Illud namque dixit, ne sicut videbatur, crederetur tantummodo filius hominis: hoc autem dixit, ut Patri crederetur aequalis. Qui credit in me, inquit, non credit in hoc quod videt me, sed credit in eum qui misit me. Aut cum credit in Patrem qui sibi aequalem genuit me; non quomodo me videt, sed sic credat in me, quomodo in eum qui misit me: usque adeo enim nihil distat inter eum et me, ut qui me videt videat eum qui me misit. Apostolos suos certe ipse Dominus Christus misit, quod eorum etiam nomen indicat: nam sicut graece angeli, latine nuntii vocantur, ita graece apostoli, latine missi appellantur. Nunquam tamen aliquis apostolorum dicere auderet, Qui credit in me, non credit in me, sed in eum qui misit me: omnino enim non diceret, Qui credit in me. Credimus enim apostolo, sed non credimus in apostolum: non enim apostolus justificat impium. Credenti autem in eum qui justificat impium, deputatur fides ejus ad justitiam . Posset dicere apostolus, Qui recipit me, recipit eum qui me misit; vel, Qui audit me, audit cum qui me misit: hoc enim eis ipse Dominus ait, Qui vos recipit, me recipit, et qui recipit me, recipit eum qui me misit . Quia dominus honoratur in servo, et pater in filio: sed pater tanquam in filio, dominus tanquam in servo. Filius autem unigenitus recte dicere potuit, Credite in Deum, et in me credite ; et quod nunc ait, Qui credit in me, non credit in me, sed in eum qui misit me. Non a se abstulit fidem credentis, sed noluit in forma servi remanere credentem: quoniam cum quisque credit in Patrem qui eum misit, profecto credit in Filium, sine quo Patrem non esse cognoscit; et ita credit ut credat aequalem, quoniam sequitur, Et qui videt me, videt eum qui me misit.
54.4 PL 35, 1782
4. Attend to what follows: “I am come a light into the world, that whosoever believeth on me should not abide in darkness.” He said in a certain place to His disciples, “Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on a hill cannot be hid. Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; that it may give light to all that are in the house: so let your light shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father who is in heaven:” but He did not say to them, Ye are come a light into the world, that whosoever believeth on you should not abide in darkness. Such a statement, I maintain, can nowhere be met with. All the saints, therefore, are lights, but they are illuminated by Him through faith; and every one that becomes separated from Him will be enveloped in darkness. But that Light, which enlightens them, cannot become separated from itself; for it is altogether beyond the reach of change. We believe, then, the light that has thus been lit, as the prophet or apostle: but we believe him for this end, that we may not believe on that which is itself enlightened, but, with him, on that Light which has given him light; so that we, too, may be enlightened, not by him, but, along with him, by the same Light as he. And when He saith, “That whosoever believeth on me may not abide in darkness,” He makes it sufficiently manifest that all have been found by Him in a state of darkness: but that they may not abide in the darkness wherein they have been found, they ought to believe on that Light which hath come into the world, for thereby was the world created.
Attende caetera: Ego lux in mundum veni, ut omnis qui credit in me, in tenebris non maneat. Dixit quodam loco discipulis suis, Vos estis lux mundi. Non potest civitas abscondi super montem constituta, neque accendunt lucernam, et ponunt eam sub modio, sed super candelabrum, ut luceat omnibus qui in domo sunt: sic luceat lumen vestrum coram hominibus, ut videant opera vestra bona, et glorificent Patrem vestrum qui in coelis est : non tamen eis dixit, Vos lux venistis in mundum, ut omnis qui credit in vos, in tenebris non maneat. Nusquam hoc legi posse confirmo. Lumina ergo sunt omnes sancti; sed credendo ab eo illuminantur, a quo si quis recesserit tenebrabitur. Lumen autem illud quo illuminantur, a se recedere non potest; quia incommutabile omnino est. Credimus ergo lumini illuminato, sicut prophetae, sicut apostolo: sed ideo illi credimus, ut non in ipsum credamus quod illuminatur, sed cum illo credamus in illud lumen a quo illuminatur; ut et nos illuminemur, non ab illo, sed cum illo a quo ille. Cum autem dicit, Ut omnis qui credit in me, in tenebris non maneat; satis manifestat omnes se in tenebris invenisse: sed ne in eis tenebris maneant in quibus inventi sunt, debent credere in lucem quae venit in mundum, quia per illam factus est mundus.
54.5 PL 35, 1782
5. “And if any man,” He says, “hear my words, and keep them not, I judge him not.” Remember what I know you have heard in former lessons; and if any of you have forgotten, recall it: and those of you who were absent then, but are present now, hear how it is that the Son saith, “I judge him not,” while in another place He says, “The Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son;” namely, that thereby we are to understand, It is not now that I judge him. And why not now? Listen to the sequel: “For I am not come,” He says, “to judge the world, but to save the world;” that is, to bring the world into a state of salvation. Now, therefore, is the season of mercy, afterwards will be the time for judgment: for He says, “I will sing to Thee, O Lord, of mercy and judgment.”
Et si quis audierit, inquit, verba mea, et non custodierit, ego non judico eum. Mementote quae vos audisse in superioribus lectionibus novi; et qui obliti forte estis, recolite; et qui non adfuistis, sed adestis, audite quomodo dicit Filius, Ego non judico eum; cum dicat alio loco, Pater non judicat quemquam, sed omne judicium dedit Filio : nisi quia intelligendum est, Modo non judico eum. Quare non judicat modo? Attende quid sequitur: Non enim veni, inquit, ut judicem mundum, sed ut salvificem mundum: id est ut salvum faciam mundum. Nunc ergo est tempus misericordiae, post erit judicii: quia, Misericordiam, inquit, et judicium cantabo tibi, Domine .
54.6 PL 35, 1782
6. But see also what He says of that future judgment in the end: “He that despiseth me, and receiveth not my words, hath one that judgeth him: the word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day.” He says not, He that despiseth me, and receiveth not my words, I judge him not at the last day; for had He said so, I do not see how it could have been else than contradictory of that other statement, when He says, “The Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son.” But when He said, “He that despiseth me, and receiveth not my words, hath one to judge him,” and, for the information of those who were waiting to hear who that one was, went on to add, “The word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day,” He made it sufficiently manifest that He Himself would then be the judge. For it was of Himself He spake, Himself He announced, and Himself He set forth as the gate whereby He entered as the Shepherd to His sheep. In one way, therefore, will those be judged who have never heard that word, in another way those who have heard and despised. “For as many as have sinned without law,” says the apostle, “shall also perish without law; and as many as have sinned in the law, shall be judged by the law.”
Sed de ipso etiam futuro novissimo judicio videte quid dicat: Qui spernit me et non accipit verba mea, habet qui judicet eum: sermo quem locutus sum, ille judicabit eum in novissimo die. Non ait, Qui spernit me, et non accipit verba mea, ego non judico eum in novissimo die. Hoc enim si dixisset, non video quomodo posset non esse contrarium illi sententiae ubi ait, Pater non judicat quemquam, sed omne judicium dedit Filio. Cum vero dixit, Qui spernit me, et non accipit verba mea, habet qui judicet eum; exspectantibus autem quisnam ille esset, secutus adjunxit, Sermo quem locutus sum, ille judicabit eum in novissimo die: satis manifestavit semetipsum judicaturum in novissimo die. Seipsum quippe locutus est, seipsum annuntiavit, seipsum januam posuit, qua ipse ad oves pastor intraret. Aliter itaque judicabuntur qui non audierunt, aliter qui audierunt et contempserunt. Qui enim sine Lege peccaverunt, ait Apostolus, sine Lege et peribunt: et qui in Lege peccaverunt, per Legem judicabuntur .
54.7 PL 35, 1783
7. “For I have not,” He says, “spoken of myself.” He says that He has not spoken of Himself, because He is not of Himself. Of this we have frequently discoursed already; so that now, without any more instruction, we have simply to remind you of it as a truth with which you are familiar. “But the Father who sent me, He gave me a commandment what I should say, and what I should speak.” We would not stay to elaborate this, did we know that we were now speaking with those with whom we have spoken on former occasions, and of these, not with all, but such only whose memories have retained what they heard: but because there are perhaps some now present who did not hear, and some in a similar condition who have forgotten what they heard, on their account let those who remember what they have heard bear with our delay. How giveth the Father a commandment to His only Son? With what words doth He speak to the Word, seeing that the Son Himself is the only-begotten Word? Could it be by an angel, seeing that by Him the angels were created? Was it by means of a cloud, which, when it gave forth its sound to the Son, gave it not on His account, as He Himself also tells us elsewhere, but for the sake of others who were needing to hear it (ver. 29)? Could it be by any sound issuing from the lips, where bodily form was wanting, and where there is no such local distance separating the Son from the Father as to admit of any intervening air, to give effect, by its percussion, to the voice, and render it audible? Let us put away all such unworthy notions of that incorporeal and ineffable subsistence. The only Son is the Word and the Wisdom of the Father, and therein are all the commandments of the Father. For there was no time that the Son knew not the Father’s commandment, so as to make it necessary for Him to possess in course of time what He possessed not before. For what He has received from the Father, He received in being born, and was given it in being begotten. For the life He is, and life He certainly received in being born, while yet there was no antecedent time when life was wanting to His personal existence. For, on the one hand, the Father has life, and is what He has: and yet He received it not, because He is not of any one. But the Son received life as the Father’s gift, of whom He is: and so He Himself is what He has; for He has life, and is the life. Listen to Himself when He says, “As the Father hath life in Himself, so hath He given to the Son to have life in Himself.” Could He give it to one who was in being, and yet hitherto was destitute thereof? On the contrary, in the very begetting it was given by Him who begat the life, and so life begat the life. And to show that He begat the life equal, and not inferior to Himself, it was said, “As He hath life in Himself, so hath He also given to the Son to have life in Himself.” He gave life; for in begetting the life, what was it He gave Him, save to be the life? And as His nativity is itself eternal, there never was a time without that Son who is the life, and never was there a time when the Son Himself was without the life; and as His nativity is eternal, so He, who was thus born, is eternal life. And so the Father gave not to the Son a commandment which He had not already; but, as I said, in the Wisdom of the Father, that is, in the word of the Father, are laid up all the Father’s commandments. And yet the commandment is said to have been given Him, because He, to whom it is thus given, is not of Himself: and to give that to the Son which He never was without, is the same in meaning as to beget that Son who never was without existence.
Quia ego, inquit, ex meipso non sum locutus. Ideo se dicit non locutum ex seipso, quia non est ex seipso. Jam hoc saepe diximus; jam hoc tanquam notissimum non docere sed admonere debemus. Sed qui misit me Pater, ipse mihi mandatum dedit quid dicam et quid loquar. Non laboraremus, si cum eis nos loqui sciremus, cum quibus superiora locuti sumus, et cum eis ipsis non omnibus, sed quae audierunt memoria retinentibus: nunc vero quia fortasse aliqui adsunt qui non audierunt, eisque sunt similes qui obliti sunt quod audierunt, propter illos perferant moras nostras qui audita meminerunt. Quomodo dat mandatum Pater unico Filio? Quo verbo loquitur Verbo, cum sit ipse Filius unigenitum Verbum? Numquid per angelum, cum per ipsum creati sint Angeli? Numquid per nubem: quae quando sonuit ad Filium, non propter ipsum sonuit, quod alibi dicit etiam ipse; sed propter alios quos oportebat ita audire? Numquid per sonum labiis emissum, qui non habet corpus; nec aliquo locorum intervallo Filius a Patre separatur, ut sit inter illos aer medius, quo percusso vox fiat et in aurem veniat? Absit ut talia de illa incorporea et ineffabili substantia suspicemur. Filius unicus est Verbum Patris, et Sapientia Patris; in illa sunt omnia mandata Patris. Neque enim Patris mandatum Filius aliquando nesciebat, ut eum necesse esset ex tempore habere quod antea non habebat. Ita enim a Patre quod habet accepit, ut nascendo acceperit, dederitque illi gignendo. Nam et vita est, et accepit vitam utique nascendo, non prius sine vita existendo. Quia et Pater habet vitam, et quod habet est: nec accepit tamen, quia non ex aliquo est. Filius autem accepit vitam, dante Patre a quo est: et ipse quod habet, est; habet enim vitam, et vita est. Ipsum audi loquentem: Sicut habet, inquit, Pater vitam in semetipso, sic dedit et Filio vitam habere in semetipso . Numquid existenti, et non habenti dedit? Sed eo dedit quo genuit, qui vitam genuit, et vita genuit vitam. Et quia parem genuit, non imparem vitam; ideo dictum est, Sicut habet ipse vitam in semetipso, sic dedit et Filio vitam habere in semetipso. Vitam dedit, quia gignendo vitam, quid dedit, nisi esse vitam? Et quia aeterna est ipsa nativitas, nunquam non fuit Filius qui est vita, nunquam fuit Filius sine vita; et sicut est nativitas aeterna, sic est qui natus est vita aeterna. Ita et mandatum non quod Filius non habebat, Pater dedit; sed, sicut dixi, in Sapientia Patris, quod est Verbum Patris, omnia mandata sunt Patris. Dicitur autem mandatum datum, quia non est a seipso cui dicitur datum: et hoc est dare Filio sine quo nunquam Filius fuit, quod est gignere Filium qui nunquam non fuit.
54.8 PL 35, 1784
8. There follow the words: “And I know that His commandment is life everlasting.” If, then, the Son Himself is eternal life, and the Father’s commandment the same, what else is expressed than this, I am the Father’s commandment? And in like manner, in what He proceeds to say, “Whatsoever I speak, even as the Father said unto me, so I speak,” let us not be taking the “said unto me” as if the Father used words in speaking to the only Word, or that the Word of God needed words from God. The Father spake to the Son in the same way as He gave life to the Son; not that He knew not the one, or had not the other, but just because He was the Son. What, then, do the words mean, “Even as He said unto me, so I speak;” but just, I speak the truth? So the former said as the Truthful One what the latter thus spake as the Truth. The Truthful begat the Truth. What, then, could He now say to the Truth? For the Truth had no imperfection to be supplied by additional truth. He spake, therefore, to the Truth, because He begat the Truth. And in like manner the Truth Himself speaks what has been said to Him; but only to those who have understanding, and who are taught by Him as the God-begotten Truth. But that men might believe what they had not yet capacity to understand, words that were audible issued from His human lips; sounds passing rapidly away broke on the ear, and speedily completed the little term of their duration: but the truths themselves, of which the sounds are but signs, passed, as it were, into the memory of those who heard them, and have come down to us also by means of written characters as signs addressed to the eye. But it is not thus that the Truth speaks; He speaks inwardly to the souls of the intelligent; He needs no sound to instruct, but floods the mind with the light of understanding. And he, then, who in that light is able to behold the eternity of His birth, himself hears in the same way the Truth speaking, as He heard the Father telling Him what He should speak. He has awakened in us a great longing for that sweet experience of His presence within; but it is by daily growth that we acquire it; it is by walking that we grow, and it is by forward efforts we walk, so as to be able at last to attain it.
Sequitur autem: Et scio quia mandatum ejus vita aeterna est. Si ergo vita aeterna est ipse Filius, et vita aeterna est mandatum Patris; quid aliud dictum est, quam, Ego sum mandatum Patris? Proinde et id quod adjungit, et dicit, Quae ego loquor, sicut dixit mihi Pater, sic loquor; non accipiamus, dixit mihi, quasi Pater verba locutus sit unico Verbo, aut egeat Dei verbis Dei Verbum. Dixit ergo Pater Filio, sicut dedit vitam Filio: non quod nesciebat vel non habebat, sed quod ipse Filius erat. Quid est autem, sicut dixit mihi, sic loquor, nisi, Verum loquor? Ita ille dixit ut verax, ita ista loquitur ut veritas. Verax autem genuit veritatem. Quid ergo jam diceret veritati! Non enim imperfecta erat veritas, cui verum aliquid adderetur. Dixit ergo veritati, quia genuit veritatem. Porro ipsa veritas sic loquitur, ut ei dictum est: sed intelligentibus, quos docet ut nata est. Ut autem crederent homines quod intelligere nondum valent, ex ore carnis verba sonuerunt, et abierunt; transvolantes soni strepuerunt, peractis morulis temporum suorum: sed res ipsae quarum signa sunt soni, trajectae quodammodo in eorum memoriam qui audierunt, etiam ad nos per litteras quae visibilia signa sunt, pervenerunt. Non sic loquitur veritas: intelligentibus mentibus intus loquitur, sine sono instruit, intelligibili luce perfundit. Qui ergo potest in ea videre nativitatis ejus aeternitatem, ipse illam sic audit loquentem, sicut ei dixit Pater quod loqueretur. Excitavit nos ad magnum desiderium interioris dulcedinis suae: sed crescendo capimus, ambulando crescimus, proficiendo ambulamus, ut pervenire possimus.