Jude

Epistola Catholica B. Judæ Apostoli

Introductions

Enciclopedia Cattolica Judas Thaddeus

The last of the seven catholic epistles of the New Testament.

After the inscription and the greetings (vv. 1-2), the author states the purpose for which he writes: "to exhort you to com- "to contend for the faith" against the intruding false teachers (3-4). Against these he warns the readers, citing examples from biblical history and from Jewish traditions (vv. 9-16). He reiterates warnings and directives (vv. 17-23) and concludes with a fine doxology (vv. 24 ff.). The author presents himself as "J. a servant of Jesus Christ and brother of James" (v. 1). The term "servant" does not exclude his being an apostle, and precisely J. Thaddaeus.

Read the encyclopedia article

Haydock introduction to the book

This Epistle, as we find by Eusebius (lib. iii. History of the Church, ch. XXV.) and St. Jerome, (in Catalogo) was not everywhere received as canonical till about the end of the fourth age[century]. It is cited by Origen, hom. vii. in Josue[Joshua]; by Tertullian, lib. de cultu foeminarum; by Clement of Alexandria, lib. iii. Paedag.; by St. Athanasius, in Synopsi; by St. Gregory of Nazianzus, Carm. xxxiv.; by St. Cyril of Jerusalem, Catech. 4ta.; by the councils of Laodicea and the third council of Carthage; by St. Augustine, lib. ii. de Doct. Christiana, ch. VIII. See Tillemont, and Nat. Alex. in his preface to this epistle. The time when it was written is uncertain, only it is insinuated in ver. 17, that few of the apostles were then living, perhaps only St. John. The design was to give all Christians a horror of the detestable doctrine and infamous practices of the Simonites, Nicolaites, and such heretics, who having the name of Christians, were become a scandal to religion and to all mankind, as may be seen in St. Irenaeus and St. Epiphanius. He copies in a manner what St. Peter had written in his third[second?] Epistle, (2 Peter 2.) (Witham) --- St. Jude in the first part of his Epistle, (ver. 1 to 16) writes against certain heretics of his day, known in history by the name of Gnostics, whose extravagant opinions and shameful and criminal disorders have been described by St. Epiphanius, St. Irenaeus, and other Fathers. In the second part, he seems to have principally in view such as were to arise in the latter times; and he exhorts such of the faithful as should live to see those days, to remain firm in the faith which they had received, applying themselves to prayer, persevering in charity, and awaiting the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ and eternal life, which He has promised them. St. Jude in thus exerting himself, like St. Peter, against the first and last heresies, has invincibly established the perpetuity of the Catholic Church. With regard to the doubts of certain authors relative to the authenticity of this Epistle, we can oppose Origen, who says that St. Jude wrote a letter, which in the few lines it contains, includes discourses full of force and heavenly grace --- Ioudas egrapsen epistolen oligostichon men, pepleromenen de ton tes ouraniou charitos erromenon logon. --- And St. Epiphanius says, that he believed the Holy Ghost inspired St. Jude with the design of writing against the Gnostics in the letter he has left us....We find it inserted in the ancient catalogues of sacred Scripture, as in that of the council of Laodicea, canon. lx; of Carthage, canon xlvii: nor can there be any reasonable doubt at present for admitting it into the canon of Scripture. It is received by the Catholic Church, and has been received ever since the fourth age[century]. What gave doubts relative to the authenticity of this Epistle, was the author's quoting a prophecy of Enoch, which seemed to have been taken from a spurious work published under the name of this patriarch, and a fact concerning the death of Moses, not found in the canonical books of the Old Testament; but the apostle might have cited the prophecy of Enoch, and the fact concerning Moses, on the faith of some ancient tradition, without a reference to any book. Eusebius (History of the Church, lib. iii. ch. XXV.) bears testimony that this Epistle, though not frequently cited by the ancients, was publicly read in many Churches. Clement of Alexandria, Tertullian, and the later Fathers, have admitted it as a part of canonical Scripture. Hence Luther, the Centuriators of Magdeburg, and the Anabaptists, have no just reason to look upon this Epistle as doubtful. Le Clerc, in his Hist. Eccles. (an. 90.) acts more candidly in admitting it without any scruple. As for the exception Grotius takes from St. Jude not assuming the quality of apostle, and from its not being universally received in the first ages[centuries], we can answer, that St. Peter, St. Paul, St. John, did not take the title of apostles at the head of all their letters, and that some Churches have doubted at first of the authenticity of other writings, which have afterwards been universally acknowledged as authentic and canonical.

Douay 1582/1609 the argument of the book, Rheims 1582
THE ARGVMENT OF THE EPISTLE OF S. IVDE. 4 paragraphs

IN the Gospel these are called Fratres Iesu, Mat. 1•. the brethren of Iesus: Iames and Ioseph, and Simon, and Iude. Their father is called Alphaeus, Mat. 1•. vvhere Iames is termed, Iames of Alphaeus: Mat. 1•. a•d their mother, Maria Iacobi minoris. Marie the mother of Iames the yonger and of Ioseph. Vvhich Marie in an other place being called Maria Cleophae, Ioh. 19. vve perceiue their father vvas named both Alphaeus and also Cleophas. And that this Cleophas vvas brother to Ioseph our Ladies husband, Euseb. hist. li. 3. c. 10. Hegesippus telleth vs. Therfore because Ioseph vvas called the father of Christ, his brothers children, vvere called the brethren, that is (according to the custom of the scripture also) the kinsmen of our Lord: and not because they vvere the children of Ioseph him self by an other vvife, much lesse (as Heluidius the heretike did blaspheme) by our B. Ladie the perpetual virgin MARIE. Hovvbeit some good authors say, that their mother Marie vvas the natural sister of our Ladie, and that therfore they are called, Fratres Domini, the brethren of our Lord.

Hovvsoeuer that be, Lu•. •. three of them are reckened amōg the 12. Apostles, Iames, and Simon Cananaeus, Mat. 10. and Iude. Yea and that they vvere somevvhat more then Apostles, though lesse then Peter, S. Paul signifieth, vvhere he saith speaking of him self and Barnabas: As also the other Apostles, and the brethren of our Lord, and Cephas. 1. Cor. 9.

And as S. Luke calleth this Iude, Iude of Iames, so he calleth him self in this Epistle of his, Iude the seruant of Iesus Christ, and the brother of Iames. Mat. 10. S. Matthevv and S. 〈…〉, as Lebbaeus also in the Greeke. Ma•. 3. His feast and his 〈…〉 Church keepeth Octob. 28. called Simon and Iudes day.

His Epistle is an 〈◊〉 against a• heretikes (as it vvere a Commentarie of 2 Pet. 2.) and namely (as •. Aug. hath told vs) against those, pag. 379. 646. vvhich misconstred S. Paules Epistles and held Only faith. vvhom he calleth therfore, Men that transferre or 〈…〉 grace of God into riotousnes. v. 4. exhorting Catholikes to be constant and 〈◊〉 from their old faith, and to contend for the keeping thereof, v. 3. 〈…〉. heretikes • saith he) segregate them selues from the Church and from 〈…〉 v. 19.

Continue reading 1 paragraph

He exhorteth them to stand to their old faith, shevving them by examples, that it is damnable not to continue and be constant: 8 inueighing against the lecherie, blasphemie, apostasie, banketing of the heretikes, 14 and that their damnation vvas long foretold. 17 Catholikes therfore to be vnmoueable, to reproue the obstinate, to recouer al not desperate, to confirme the vveake, and to liue them selues vertuously and vvithout mortal sinne, vvhich by Gods grace they may doe.

Cornelius a Lapide English, machine translation
Preface 34 paragraphs

Three things are to be premised here in the usual manner: first, concerning the author of this Epistle; second, concerning its authority; third, concerning its argument.

As to the first, the author is Judas, not Iscariot, but of James, namely his brother; of James, I say, the Lesser, who was called the brother of the Lord, and who wrote the canonical Epistle. He had as his mother Mary of Alphaeus, or Cleophas, namely his wife; who is also called the mother of James, Mark xv, 40. She is also called the sister of the Blessed Virgin, and stood with her at the cross of Christ, John xix, 25, not that she was properly her sister and daughter of St. Joachim and St. Anne, as St. Jerome held against Helvidius; Theodoret, Luke vi; Bede and Anselm, Galatians 1, but sister in Hebrew phrase, that is, a kinswoman or cousin. This Mary of Alphaeus therefore had four sons, of whom three were chosen by Christ for the Apostolate, namely James, Judas and Simon; the fourth was Joseph, a competitor of Matthias, when the lot of the apostolate fell upon Matthias, Acts I. Hence these four are called the brothers of Christ, Matthew XIII, 55, not that they were sons of Joseph, the spouse of the Blessed Virgin, by another wife, and consequently stepsons of the Blessed Virgin and properly brothers of Christ, as the Nyssenus held, oration 2 On the Resurrection; Origen, Theophylactus and Euthymius in Matthew XIII; Clement of Alexandria here; Epiphanius, heresy 31; Chrysostom, oration On the Annunciation; Hilary, commentary 1 on Matthew; Ambrosiaster on Galatians cap. II; Oecumenius and Cajetan, Galatians I. Whence also the Arabic version has thus at the beginning of the Epistle: "Judas, son of Joseph the carpenter." For Joseph was celibate and a virgin, as St. Jerome transmits against Helvidius, Bede in John cap. II, Rupert in Matthew cap. 1, the Master in IV, dist. 30, cap. On the Blessed Mary, St. Thomas, III part., Question XXVIII, art. 3, ad 5, and others. See Canisius, lib. II On the Mother of God, cap. xiii; Suarez, III part., tom. II, disp. 5, sect. 4; Toledo in John, cap. II, annot. 18, and Salmeron, tom. III, tract. 23. They are therefore called brothers of Christ, that is, kinsmen, or relatives, just as their mother is called sister, that is, a kinswoman of the Blessed Virgin.

As to the etymology, Judas in Hebrew is the same as confession and praise, or confessor and praiser, namely of God and Christ. He appears to have received this name from Judah the most mighty and most celebrated of the sons of Jacob, Genesis cap. xlix, vers. 8. He, equally as his brother Simon, was surnamed Cananæus, as if sprung from Cana of Galilee, that is, Zealot, as testified by St. Jerome in cap. iv to Galatians, because he was zealous for the Lord, as St. Fulgentius says, serm. 9. Whence this voice of his full of love and zeal to Christ is recorded by St. John, xiv, 22: "Lord, why is it that thou wilt manifest thyself to us, and not to the world?" For this voice of his was stirred by those words of Christ going to death, full of the greatest love: "He that loveth me, shall be loved of my Father: and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him." Hence the same Judas was surnamed Thaddaeus and Lebbaeus, that is, lion-like, from לביא labi, that is, lion, or wise-hearted. For lion in Hebrew is called labi from לב leb, that is, heart, as if wise-hearted, or courageous, because from generosity and presence of mind undaunted. For the heart is the seat and symbol of fortitude; whence Aristomenes, who had astounded all Greece by a miracle of boldness, after death when dissected, was found to have a heart entirely covered with hair, as testified by Pliny lib. XI, cap. xxxvii. Again, Lebbaeus, that is, little heart: for it is likely that Lebbaeus is almost the same as Thaddaeus: for the Greek Matthew x, 3, and the Syriac thus have it: "Lebbaeus, who was surnamed Thaddaeus." Lebbaeus therefore is the same as little heart, from לב leb, that is, heart, as St. Jerome says in Matthew cap. x, as if to say, wonderfully cordial, benevolent, lovable; or wonderfully wise and prudent; for those who were very cautious and prudent were called little hearts, as Pliny says, lib. VII, cap. xxxi; and Festus: "Little heart," he says, "the ancients called from the heart one who was diligent and sharp." Whence Scipio Nasica, on account of prudence twice consul, was called Corculum, as Cicero says in Tusculan I.

Thaddaeus moreover is not so much derived from the Hebrew toda, that is, praise: for thus it would have been said Thoddaeus; as from the Syriac תד thad (the Hebrews say צד sad; whence God is called Saddai, that is, the breast of all goods); but the Syrians and Chaldeans often turn the Hebrew s into t, and for sad they say thad, for Saddaeus they say Thaddaeus, that is, breast, udder, as if to say, breasted, generous, sweet, merciful, kind, beneficent. Thus the Angel Caninius in Names of Hebrew of the New Testament, cap. XIII. Furthermore St. Jerome (or whoever is the author; for it is not St. Jerome) in Mark cap. vi, and from him Pagninus in Names of Hebrew interpreted, wish Lebbaeus to be said from the heart, as if a cultivator of the heart, who namely devoted himself uniquely to the purity, sanctity and perfection of the heart.

For which reason Jude was held in veneration and esteem by St. Bernard before the other Apostles; for the author of the Life of St. Bernard, book V, chapter II, relates that he received with wonderful devotion relics of St. Jude sent to him from Jerusalem, and so ordered them to be buried with him at his death and placed upon his breast, "assuredly," says the author of the Life, "with such faith and devotion that he might adhere to that same Apostle on the day of the common resurrection." Note: Jude in Hebrew includes all the letters of the name of the tetragram Jehova, and from this some think that on account of reverence for the name Jehova, as most sacred and ineffable among the Jews, he was called by the related name Thaddaeus instead of Jude. But this is a fable; for it is established that the name Jude was most commonly used among the Jews, and was even praised by God, Genesis chapter XLIX, verse 8. Moreover Eusebius, book I of the History, chapter XIII; Nicephorus, book II of the History, XL, and the Greeks in the Menology place two Thaddaei, namely one Apostle, that is this our Jude; the other who was one of the seventy disciples of Christ sent to Abgar. But others recognize only one Thaddaeus, namely Jude the Apostle. Thus St. Jerome in Matthew x, Bede in chapter 1 of Acts, Fulgentius, sermon 9. And the Latin Church commemorates only one Thaddaeus in the Martyrology and in the divine office.

According to these authorities it must be said that this Jude is that Thaddaeus who converted Abgar the king of Edessa and the Edessenes to the faith, as Eusebius relates at length in the place already cited, who also adds that this happened in the 43rd year of Christ, and that when Abgar offered to Jude gold both wrought and raw, Jude refused it and said: "If we have truly abandoned our own, how shall we accept what belongs to others?" which words indeed signify his pure, magnanimous and heavenly heart. See more in Eusebius. In the Apocalypse chapter xxi, 20, Jude is represented by chrysoprase: I have reviewed the reasons there.

Nicephorus, book II, chapter IV, the Roman Breviary of October 28, and others relate that St. Jude preached in Mesopotamia, Persia, Arabia, and Idumaea. Finally St. Jude crowned his noble apostolate with glorious martyrdom, and his sacred body, as well as that of his brother Simon, was brought to Rome and buried in the basilica of St. Peter, so that he whom he had uniquely honored in life, and whose sentiments from his epistle he had expressed in his own, might also be buried with him after death.

As to the second point, some formerly doubted the authority of this Epistle; indeed recently Cajetan held that this Epistle is of lesser authority than those which are certain sacred Scripture. Heretics, such as Luther, the Centuriators, Brentius, Kemnitius, consider it apocryphal. Their reasons are that its author cites the apocryphal book of Enoch, and the dispute of Michael with the devil over the body of Moses, which is found nowhere in Scripture; but I shall respond to these in their proper places. I say therefore: it is of faith that this Epistle is canonical Scripture. Thus the Council of Trent defines it, session IV, and the Council of Florence in the epistle of Pope Eugenius to the Armenians; the Roman Council under Damasus, the Council of Laodicea, chapter LVIII, and the Carthaginian Council, chapter XLVII. Hear St. Jerome, in the book On Ecclesiastical Writers, on Jude: "Jude," he says, "brother of James, left behind a small epistle, which is one of the seven Catholic epistles. And because in it he assumes testimony from the book of Enoch, which is apocryphal, it is rejected by many; nevertheless it has merited authority by antiquity and use; and is reckoned among the Holy Scriptures, and has most sacred authority."

Whence they cite it as canonical: St. Dionysius in On the Divine Names, chapter IV; Epiphanius, against the Gnostic heresy; Nazianzenus, in a Poem on Scripture; Didymus and Oecumenius here, St. Athanasius in the Synopsis, Ephrem, Origen and among the Latins St. Cornelius, St. Cyprian, Innocent I, Tertullian, St. Jerome, St. Ambrose, St. Augustine, Rufinus, Philastrius, Cassian, Prosper, Gelasius, Fulgentius, Alcimus, Primasius, St. Gregory, Bede, Rabanus, Remigius, Ado, Ansbertus, Angelomus and others, whom Jodocus Coccius cites at length in the Catholic Treasury, volume I, book VI, page 370, and Bellarmine, book I On the Word of God, chapter XVIII.

The Epistle was written in Greek; for although St. Jude preached in Persia, he nevertheless wrote this Epistle, as it were encyclical and universal, to the faithful everywhere, both Jews and Gentiles scattered throughout the whole world, and therefore not in Persian, but in Greek, because the Greek language was then most common and most widely spread. Moreover, Origen in chapter XIII of Matthew asserts that this Epistle is indeed of few words, but full of the efficacy of heavenly grace. It is therefore fertile by its very brevity, and like a pearl, which under a small mass includes the sum of many sestertii, which St. Hilary said of Holy Scripture, canon 6 in Matthew. For this brief Epistle establishes many things dogmatically, namely the mystery of the Holy Trinity, the incarnation and redemption of Christ, the distinction of good angels from evil, and their zeal for the salvation of men, finally faith and fear of the future judgment. Ethically it teaches the avoidance of luxury, blasphemy, disobedience, pride, avarice, hatred, deceit, flattery, respect of persons; and constancy in vocation, faith, prayer, charity, the conversion of those who err, the persecution of heretics, doxology and praise of God. Therefore, what St. Bartholomew said, as testified by St. Dionysius, chapter 1 of the Mystical Theology: "That theology is great and very small; and the Gospel is broad and great, and again compendious," you may truly say the same of this Epistle, namely that it is brief and long: brief in words, long in meaning, so that it is rare for one not to be blinded in reading it, as St. Jerome says to Paulinus.

This Epistle exists in Syriac, not in the royal Bibles, but separately, which our Etzelius translated into Latin; it exists also in Arabic, which someone of heterodox faith translated into Latin.

As to the third point, the argument of the Epistle is to refute heresies already born at that time, of Simon Magus, the Nicolaitans and Cerinthus, and soon to be born from these, of the Gnostics, Ebion, Menander, Basilides, Saturninus, Valentinus, Marcion and the like. Thus St. Epiphanius in the heresy of the Gnostics, after recounting their lusts, says that the Holy Spirit through Jude foretold of them: "Whatsoever things naturally, as dumb beasts, they know, in these they are corrupted." He therefore graphically depicts the wicked morals of the heretics, and teaches that they are to be avoided as seducers and pests, and that one must persist constantly in the faith received, lest there befall them what befell the Hebrews, the Sodomites and the angels apostatizing from God, who all miserably perished. Thus St. Athanasius in the Synopsis, Oecumenius and others. For Jude taught in Asia Minor, where the school of Simon Magus flourished, against which St. Paul likewise wrote the Epistles to the Ephesians and Colossians, to which Jude here refers. But he especially attacks the doctrine of Simon teaching that his faith alone (which was heresy and perfidy) suffices for salvation without good works, and of the Gnostics teaching that there is no sin except infidelity, but all things are indifferent, namely good to those using them well, evil to those using them badly, and therefore it is permitted with impunity to indulge in revelries and lusts; whence he sharply censures the savage and infamous lusts of the Simonians and Gnostics, and hurls against them the sharp judgment of God foretold by Enoch. Wherefore St. Ephrem, volume 1, sermon on those who entice souls to impurity, when there is nothing evil, recites this entire Epistle of St. Jude, and turns it against them. This Epistle is therefore a perpetual invective, as it were, against heretics, and those blasphemous and lustful. First, after prefixing a greeting, he exhorts the faithful to contend manfully against them for their vocation and faith, because they themselves are apostates, like the Sodomites and angels rebellious to God, and with them destined to perish and will perish.

Then, verse 8, he accuses their lusts, rebellions, blasphemies and curses, whereas Michael, though having a just cause, did not dare to curse Satan. Third, verse 11, he compares them to Cain, Balaam, Core the seditious, and calls them clouds without water, autumn trees, waves of the fierce sea, wandering stars, of which Enoch prophesied, threatening them with the sharp judgments of God, since they are murmurers, full of concupiscences, proud, avaricious. Fourth, verse 17, he exhorts that, steadfastly adhering to the faith and doctrine of the Apostles, they resist the heretics. Finally, verse 20, he exhorts the faithful to prayer, charity, mercy and zeal for souls, that they may bring back to the faith those seduced by heretics; to chastity, that they may present themselves spotless before the tribunal of the judge Christ. And at last a doxology closes the Epistle, saying: "To God alone, our Saviour, through Jesus Christ our Lord, be glory and majesty, dominion and power before all ages, and now, and for all ages of ages. Amen."

Among the ancients, Didymus and Clement of Alexandria wrote on this Epistle; but they exist briefly in the Library of the Holy Fathers; many of the moderns, most recently our Justinianus and Lorinus. I likewise shall be brief after my manner, especially because I have said most of what is to be said here in II Peter, II.

Note here that this Epistle is very similar to the Second Epistle of St. Peter, chapter II, and therefore has many of the same, or nearly the same, sentences with it. Wherefore either St. Peter took these from St. Jude, as Salmeron wishes, to confirm his sayings; or certainly Jude received them from St. Peter, as Baronius wishes, in the year of Christ 68, Adam Sasbout, Lorinus, Hugo, Thomas Anglicus and Primaticeius here, who the three last think for this reason this Epistle is in the Biblical order the last, because it was published last (except the Epistle of St. John), and therefore after the death of St. Peter, who wrote his second Epistle a little before his death in the year of Christ 68. Which if true, it must be said that St. Jude with his brother Simon the Canaanite met death not in the year of Christ 64, as Tuphrius wishes in the Chronicle, but after St. Peter and after the year of Christ 68. Furthermore, so that you may see the harmony and consonance of St. Peter and St. Jude, take the same sentences of each digested through parallels.

Parallels of the Same Sentences of St. Peter's Epistle II and St. Jude

I. (II Peter) Chapter II, verse 1. "There shall be false teachers among you, who shall bring in sects of perdition." And verse 3. "Whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not." (Jude) Verse 4. "Certain men have crept in unawares (who were written of long ago unto this judgment) ungodly men."

II. (II Peter) "And denying the Lord who bought them." (Jude) "Denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ."

III. (II Peter) Verse 2. "And many shall follow their riotousness, through whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of." (Jude) "Turning the grace of our God into riotousness."

IV. (II Peter) Verse 4. "For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but delivered them, drawn down by infernal ropes to hell, to be tormented, to be reserved unto judgment." (Jude) Verse 6. "And the angels who kept not their principality, but forsook their own habitation, he hath reserved under darkness in everlasting chains unto the judgment of the great day."

V. (II Peter) Verse 6. "And reducing the cities of the Sodomites and of the Gomorrhites into ashes, condemned them to be overthrown, making them an example unto those that should afterwards act ungodly." (Jude) Verse 7. "As Sodom and Gomorrha, and the neighbouring cities, in like manner, having given themselves to fornication, and going after other flesh, were made an example, suffering the punishment of eternal fire."

VI. (II Peter) Verse 10. "But chiefly them who walk after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness, and despise government." (Jude) Verse 8. "In like manner these men also defile the flesh, and despise dominion."

VII. (II Peter) "Sects (δόξας) they fear not to bring in, blaspheming." (Jude) "They blaspheme majesty (δόξαν)."

VIII. (II Peter) Verse 11. "Whereas angels, who are greater in strength and power, bring not against themselves a railing judgment." (Jude) Verse 9. "When Michael the Archangel, disputing with the devil, contended about the body of Moses, he durst not bring against him the judgment of railing, but said: The Lord command thee."

IX. (II Peter) Verse 12. "But these men, etc., blaspheming those things which they know not, shall perish in their corruption." (Jude) Verse 10. "But these men blaspheme whatever things they know not; and those things which they naturally know, like dumb beasts, in these they are corrupted."

X. (II Peter) Verse 13. "Stains and blemishes, rioting in their own delights, feasting together." (Jude) Verse 12. "These are spots in your feasts, feasting together without fear, feeding themselves."

XI. (II Peter) Verse 14. "Having eyes full of adultery and of sin that ceaseth not;" and verse 3. "And through covetousness shall with feigned words make merchandise of you." (Jude) Verse 16. "Admiring persons for the sake of gain."

XII. (II Peter) Verse 15. "Following the way of Balaam of Bosor, who loved the wages of iniquity." (Jude) Verse 11. "They have rushed greedily after the error of Balaam for reward."

XIII. (II Peter) Verse 17. "These are fountains without water, and clouds tossed about by whirlwinds, to whom the mist of darkness is reserved." (Jude) Verses 12 and 13. "Clouds without water, which are carried about by winds, etc., to whom the storm of darkness is reserved for ever."

XIV. (II Peter) Verse 18. "For speaking proud words of vanity, they allure by the desires of carnal riotousness." (Jude) Verse 16. "Walking according to their desires, and their mouth speaketh proud things."

XV. (II Peter) Chapter III, verses 1 and 2. "Dearly beloved, etc., be mindful of those words which I have spoken before, etc., and of the Apostles, the precepts of the Lord and Saviour." (Jude) Verse 17. "But you, beloved, be mindful of the words which have been spoken before by the Apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ."

XVI. (II Peter) Verse 3. "This first understanding, that in the last days there shall come deceivers, walking according to their own desires." (Jude) Verse 18. "Who told you, that in the last time there should be mockers, walking according to their own desires in impieties."

XVII. (II Peter) Verse 11. "What manner of people ought you to be in holy conversations and in godliness, expecting and hasting unto the coming of the day of the Lord." (Jude) Verse 21. "Keep yourselves in the love of God, waiting for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ unto life everlasting."

XVIII. (II Peter) Vers. 18. "To him be glory both now and unto the day of eternity. Amen." (Jude) Vers. 25. "To God alone our Saviour, through Jesus Christ our Lord, be glory and majesty, dominion and power before all ages, and now, and unto all ages of ages. Amen."

Machine translation from the Latin, not reviewed.

Estius Latin
PRAEFATIOe 4 paragraphs

Ultima Catholicaruin, eademque brevissima (nam secunda et tertia Joannis proprie Catholicae non sunt) est Epistola Judae Apostoli, qui frater fuit Jacobi, cujus est inter Catholicas prima. Nam et Lucas Evangelii sui cap. 6. et Act. 1. Judam Jacobi appellat, et ipse se in fronte Epistolae /"mfrem Jacobi nomma,t', ejus scilicet Jacobi, quem Paulus Gal. 1. fratrem Domini vocat; ut proinde et Judas frater Domini vocari potuerit; quemadmodum et vocatus fuit a Judaeis, dicentibus de Christo: Nonne mater ejus dicitur Maria et fratres ejus Jacobus et Josephj et Simon et Judas? Matth. 13. et Marc. 6., fratres utique cognatione. Fuit autem Judas trinomius, quoniam et Thaddaeus vocatur, Matth. 10. et Marc. 3., et Lehhaeus, ibidem apud Matthaeum juxta textum Graecum et Syriacum. LehhaeuSy inquit, qui cognominatus est Thaddaeus. Lebbaeus autem Hebraeis corculum significat.

De hac Epistola, num inter Scripturas sacras esset recipienda, dubitatum aliquando fuisse, testantur Eusebius lib. 2. hist. Eccles. cap. 22. et lib. 3. cap. 19., etHieronymus in catak de Juda Apostolo. Causam, cur dubitatum fuerit, hanc adfert Hieronymus, quia de libro Enoch, qui apocryphus est, in ea assumitur testimonium. Addunt alii de Archangeli Michaelis altercatione cum diabolo. Nam et illud ex apocrypho sumptum videri potest. Verum haec ratio quam parum firma sit ad infirmandam Epistolae auctoritatem, ostendemus in tractatione dicti testimonii. Sane Eusebius ipse, priori loco jam citato, affirmat, ista quorundam dubitatione non obsfante, hanc Epistolam cum reliquis, quae Catholicae vocantur, in quam plurimis Ecclesiis publice receptam et approbatam esse. Qui et lib. 6. cap. 11. refert, Clementem Alexandrinum in libris hypotyposeon, ut in alias Scripturas, ita et in Epistolam Judae breves scripsisse explicationes, quae et hodie exstant.

Agnoscunt autem ut canonicam Scripturam antiquissimi scriptores, Tertullianus libro de habitu muliebri, cap. 3., et Origenes hom. 7. super Josue. Citat quoque Hieronymus sub nomin« Judae Apostoli, scribens in Jeremiae cap. 29. et Ezech. 32., ac sub nomine Judae, fratris Jacobi, in Ezech. 18. Citant et alii passim ejusdem aetatis ac sequentium, tam Graeci scriptores, quam Latini, tamquam Epistolam sacrae et indubitatae auctoritatis. Et quicumque texuerunt catologum librorum canonicorum, hanc Epistolam intexunt. Ut Innocentius primus, Gelasius primus, Athanasius, Augustinus, Isidorus,

Convenit argumentum hujus Epistolae cum iis, quae B. Petrus scribit in secunda Epistola, praesertim cap. 2. et initio tertii. Nam quae hic scribuntur, adeo cum illis similia sunt, ut hujus auctor S. Judas ea non solum legisse videatur, verum etiam, partim contrahendo, partim extendendo, partim iisdem vocibusetsententiisutendo, imitatus fuisse. Quodigitur de illius Epistolae argumento dictum est, etiam ad hanc referendum. Scripta est enim, perinde ut illa, generaliter quidem propter exhortandos fideles ad fidei perseverantiam et studium bonorum operum, adversus eos, qui fidem jactabant sine operibus (quod argumentum esse Epistolis cmnibus catholicis commune, docuimus in earum prolegomenis); specialiter autem, tam contra Nicolaitas, quorum mentio est in Apocalypsi, quam contra sectam impurissimam Simonis magi, quae (tametsi magistro jam exstincto) canceris in morem latius serpebat, et propagabatur in nova germina, Quo pertinet, quod dicit, eos Dei grdtiam transferre in luxuriam, quodque vocat ilhisores secundwn de~ sideria sua ambulantes in impietatibus. Scripsit aiitem Judas, ut recte censet Oecumenius, post mortem aliorum Apostoet Synodi tam particulares, quam universales: Laodicena, Carthaginensis 3., Florentina, Tridentina. Denique et hodie recipitur ab omnibus, etiam sectariis, saltem plerisque; licet a Luthero et Anabaptistis, nec non a Genturiatoribus in dubium rur- Qus fuerit vocata. Cur autem in Syriaco textu non habeatur, causam reddidimus in prolegomenis 2. Epist. B. Petri. lorum, Simoniacisjam libere turpitudinem suam exercentibus. Nam Apostolorum, tamquam praecessorum, qui vita jam excesserint, meminit vers. 17.. potissimum intelligens Petrum, Paulum, Jacobum. Nam Joannes adhuc vivebat. His consentanea scribit Epiphanius in haeresi Gnosticorum, quorum in Simone exstitit origo. Nam post commemoratas illius sectae monstrosas et infandas libidines, tandem infert: Quare de his commotus Spiritus sanctuSf in Apostolo Juda ait: Quae^ cumque naturaliter tamquam muta animalia norunt, in his corrumpuntur etc. Porro verisimile est, ad eosdem scriptam esse, ad quos scripsit B. Petrus, id est, ad eos praecipue, qui ex circumcisione crediderant. Innuit hoc, cum dicit: ^lemores estote verborum, quae praedicta sunt ab Apostolis Domini nostri Jesu Christi, qui dicebant vobis, quoniam in novissimo tempore venient illusores etc. Hoc enim praedixit Petrus 2 Epist. 2.; quem ad Judaeos utramque Epistolam scripsisse, suislocisostendimus. Id ipsum indicant illa verba, vers. 5.: Commonere autem vos volo, scientes semel omnia. Nam idaptissirae Judaeis dicitur, a prima aetate imbutis cognitione historiae sacrae.

Chapters

Save for later

Enter your email and we will send you a sign-in link. No password. What you save (articles, verses, chapters, documents) follows you to any device.