Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 119
119.1 Chapter XIX. 24–30 PL 35, 1950
1. The Lord being now crucified, and the parting of His garments having also been completed by the casting of the lot, let us look at what the evangelist John thereafter relates. “And these things,” he says, “the soldiers did. Now there stood by the cross of Jesus His mother, and His mother’s sister, Mary [the wife] of Cleophas, and Mary Magdalene. When Jesus therefore saw His mother, and the disciple standing by whom He loved, He saith unto His mother, Woman, behold thy son! Then saith He to the disciple, Behold thy mother! And from that hour the disciple took her unto his own home.” This, without a doubt, was the hour whereof Jesus, when about to turn the water into wine, had said to His mother, “Woman, what have I to do with thee? mine hour is not yet come.” This hour, therefore, He had foretold, which at that time had not yet arrived, when it should be His to acknowledge her at the point of death, and with reference to which He had been born as a mortal man. At that time, therefore, when about to engage in divine acts, He repelled, as one unknown, her who was the mother, not of His divinity, but of His [human] infirmity; but now, when in the midst of human sufferings, He commended with human affection [the mother] by whom He had become man. For then, He who had created Mary became known in His power; but now, that which Mary had brought forth was hanging on the cross.
Crucifixo Domino, posteaquam divisio vestimentorum ejus etiam sorte missa completa est, quae deinde narret Joannes evangelista videamus. « Et milites quidem, » inquit, « haec fecerunt. Stabant autem juxta crucem Jesu, mater ejus, et soror matris ejus Maria Cleophae, et Maria Magdalene. Cum vidisset ergo Jesus matrem et discipulum stantem quem diligebat, dicit matri suae, Mulier, ecce filius tuus: deinde dicit discipulo, Ecce mater tua. Et ex illa hora accepit eam discipulus in sua. » Haec nimirum est illa hora de qua Jesus aquam conversurus in vinum, dixerat matri, Quid mihi et tibi est, mulier? nondum venit hora mea . Hanc itaque horam praedixerat quae tunc nondum venerat, in qua deberet agnoscere moriturus, de qua fuerat mortaliter natus. Tunc ergo divina facturus, non divinitatis, sed infirmitatis matrem velut incognitam repellebat: nunc autem humana jam patiens, ex qua fuerat factus homo, affectu commendabat humano. Tunc enim qui Mariam creaverat, innotescebat virtute: nunc vero quod Maria pepererat, pendebat in cruce.
119.2 PL 35, 1950
2. A passage, therefore, of a moral character is here inserted. The good Teacher does what He thereby reminds us ought to be done, and by His own example instructed His disciples that care for their parents ought to be a matter of concern to pious children: as if that tree to which the members of the dying One were affixed were the very chair of office from which the Master was imparting instruction. From this wholesome doctrine it was that the Apostle Paul had learned what he taught in turn, when he said, “But if any provide not for his own, and especially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.” And what are so much home concerns to any one, as parents to children, or children to parents? Of this most wholesome precept, therefore, the very Master of the saints set the example from Himself, when, not as God for the hand-maid whom He had created and governed, but as a man for the mother, of whom He had been created, and whom He was now leaving behind, He provided in some measure another son in place of Himself. And why He did so, He indicates in the words that follow: for the evangelist says, “And from that hour the disciple took her unto his own,” speaking of himself. In this way, indeed, he usually refers to himself as the disciple whom Jesus loved: who certainly loved them all, but him beyond the others, and with a closer familiarity, so that He even made him lean upon His bosom at supper; in order, I believe, in this way to commend the more highly the divine excellence of this very gospel, which He was thereafter to preach through his instrumentality.
Moralis igitur insinuatur locus. Facit quod faciendum admonet, et exemplo suo suos instruxit praeceptor bonus, ut a filiis piis impendatur cura parentibus: tanquam lignum illud ubi erant fixa membra morientis, etiam cathedra fuerit magistri docentis. Ex hac sana doctrina didicerat Paulus apostolus quod docebat, quando dicebat: Si quis autem suis, et maxime domesticis non providet, fidem negavit, et est infideli deterior . Quid autem tam cuique domesticum quam parentes filiis, aut parentibus filii? Hujus itaque saluberrimi praecepti ipse magister sanctorum de seipso constituebat exemplum, quando non ut famulae Deus quam creaverat et regebat, sed ut matri homo de qua creatus fuerat et quam relinquebat, alterum pro se quodammodo filium providebat. Nam cur hoc fecerit, quod sequitur indicat: ait enim Evangelista, Et ex illa hora accepit eam discipulus in sua, de seipso dicens. Sic quippe commemorare se solet, quod eum diligebat Jesus: qui utique omnes, sed ipsum prae caeteris et familiarius diligebat, ita ut in convivio super pectus suum discumbere faceret ; credo ut istius Evangelii, quod per eum fuerat praedicaturus, divinam excellentiam hoc modo altius commendaret.
119.3 PL 35, 1951
3. But what was this “his own,” unto which John took the mother of the Lord? For he was not outside the circle of those who said unto Him, “Lo, we have left all, and followed Thee.” No, but on that same occasion he had also heard the words, Every one that hath forsaken these things for my sake, shall receive an hundred times as much in this world. That disciple, therefore, had an hundredfold more than he had cast away, whereunto to receive the mother of Him who had graciously bestowed it all. But it was in that society that the blessed John had received an hundredfold, where no one called anything his own, but they had all things in common; even as it is recorded in the Acts of the Apostles. For the apostles were as if having nothing, and yet possessing all things. How was it, then, that the disciple and servant received unto his own the mother of his Lord and Master, where no one called anything his own? Or, seeing we read a little further on in the same book, “For as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of them, and laid them down at the apostles’ feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need,” are we not to understand that such distribution was made to this disciple of what was needful, that there was also added to it the portion of the blessed Mary, as if she were his mother; and ought we not the rather so to take the words, “From that hour the disciple took her unto his own,” that everything necessary for her was entrusted to his care? He received her, therefore, not unto his own lands, for he had none of his own; but to his own dutiful services, the discharge of which, by a special dispensation, was entrusted to himself.
Sed in quae sua Joannes matrem Domini accepit? Neque enim non ex eis erat qui dixerunt ei, Ecce nos dimisimus omnia, et secuti sumus te. Sed ibi quoque audierat, Quicumque ista dimiserit propter me, accipiet in hoc saeculo centies tantum . Habebat ergo ille discipulus centupliciter plura quam dimiserat, in quae susciperet ejus matrem qui illa donaverat. Sed in ea societate beatus Joannes receperat centuplum, ubi nemo dicebat aliquid suum, sed erant illis omnia communia; sicut in Apostolorum Actibus scriptum est. Sic enim Apostoli erant, quasi nihil habentes, et omnia possidentes . Quomodo ergo matrem magistri et Domini sui discipulus et famulus accepit in sua, ubi aliquid suum nemo dicebat? An quia paulo post in eodem libro legitur, Quotquot enim possessores praediorum vel domorum erant, vendentes afferebant pretia eorum, et ponebant ad pedes Apostolorum: distribuebatur autem unicuique prout opus erat , intelligendum est sic distributum fuisse huic discipulo quod opus erat, ut illic etiam beatae Mariae tanquam matris ejus portio poneretur; magisque sic debemus accipere quod dictum est, Ex illa hora suscepit eam discipulus in sua, ut ad ejus curam quidquid ei esset necessarium pertineret? Suscepit ergo eam in sua, non praedia, quae nulla propria possidebat; sed officia, sed propria dispensatione exsequenda curabat.
119.4 PL 35, 1951
4. He then adds: “After this, Jesus knowing that all things were now accomplished, that the scripture might be fulfilled, saith, I thirst. Now there was set a vessel full of vinegar: and they filled a sponge with vinegar, and fixed it upon hyssop, and put it to His mouth. When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, He said, It is finished: and He bowed His head, and gave up the ghost.” Who has the power of so adjusting what he does, as this Man had of arranging all that He suffered? But this Man was the Mediator between God and men; the Man of whom we read in prophecy, He is man also, and who shall acknowledge Him? for the men who did such things acknowledged not this Man as God. For He who was manifest as man, was hid as God: He who was manifest suffered all these things, and He Himself also, who was hid, arranged them all. He saw, therefore, that all was accomplished that required to be done before He received the vinegar, and gave up the ghost; and that this also might be accomplished which the scripture had foretold, “And in my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink,” He said, “I thirst:” as if it were, One thing still you have failed to do, give me what you are. For the Jews were themselves the vinegar, degenerated as they were from the wine of the patriarchs and prophets; and filled like a full vessel with the wickedness of this world, with hearts like a sponge, deceitful in the formation of its cavernous and tortuous recesses. But the hyssop, whereon they placed the sponge filled with vinegar, being a lowly herb, and purging the heart, we fitly take for the humility of Christ Himself; which they thus enclosed, and imagined they had completely ensnared. Hence we have it said in the psalm, “Thou shalt purge me with hyssop, and I shall be cleansed.” For it is by Christ’s humility that we are cleansed; because, had He not humbled Himself, and became obedient unto the death of the cross, His blood certainly would not have been shed for the remission of sins, or, in other words, for our cleansing.
Deinde subjungit: « Postea sciens Jesus quia omnia consummata sunt, ut consummaretur Scriptura, dicit: Sitio. Vas ergo positum erat aceto plenum; illi autem spongiam plenam aceto hyssopo circumponentes, obtulerunt ori ejus. Cum ergo accepisset Jesus acetum, dixit: Consummatum est. Et inclinato capite, tradidit spiritum. » Quis potest quae facit, ita disponere, quomodo disposuit homo iste quae passus est? Sed homo mediator Dei et hominum; homo de quo praedictum legitur, Et homo est, et quis agnoscet eum? quoniam homines per quos haec fiebant, non agnoscebant hominem Deum. Homo namque apparebat qui Deus latebat; patiebatur haec omnia qui apparebat, et idem ipse disponebat haec omnia qui latebat. Vidit ergo quia consummata sunt omnia quae oportebat ut fierent antequam acciperet acetum et traderet spiritum; atque ut hoc etiam consummaretur quod Scriptura praedixerat, Et in siti mea potaverunt me aceto , Sitio, inquit: tanquam diceret, Hoc minus fecistis, date quod estis. Judaei quippe ipsi erant acetum, degenerantes a vino Patriarcharum et Prophetarum; et tanquam de pleno vase, de iniquitate mundi hujus impleti, cor habentes velut spongiam, cavernosis quodammodo atque tortuosis latibulis fraudulentum. Hyssopum autem cui circumposuerunt spongiam aceto plenam, quoniam herba est humilis, et pectus purgat, ipsius Christi humilitatem congruenter accipimus: quam circumdederunt, et se circumvenisse putaverunt. Unde est illud in psalmo, Asperges me hyssopo, et mundabor . Christi namque humilitate mundamur; quia nisi humiliasset semetipsum, factus obediens usque ad mortem crucis , non utique sanguis ejus in peccatorum remissionem, hoc est, in nostram mundationem fuisset effusus.
119.5 PL 35, 1952
5. Nor need we be disturbed with the question, how the sponge could be applied to His mouth when He was lifted up from the earth on the cross. For as we read in the other evangelists, what is omitted by this one, it was fixed on a reed, so that such drink as was contained in the sponge might be raised to the highest part of the cross. By the reed, however, the scripture was signified, which was fulfilled by this very act. For as a tongue is called either Greek or Latin, or any other, significant of the sound, which is uttered by the tongue; so the reed may give its name to the letter which is written with a reed. We most usually, however, call those tongues that express the sounds of the human voice: while in calling scripture a reed, the very rareness of the thing only enhances the mystical nature of that which it symbolizes. A wicked people did such things, a compassionate Christ suffered them. They who did them, knew not what they did; but He who suffered, not only knew what was done, and why it was so, but also wrought what was good through those who were doing what was evil.
Nec moveat quomodo spongia ori ejus potuerit admoveri, qui in cruce fuerat exaltatus a terra. Sicut enim apud alios evangelistas legitur, quod hic praetermisit, in arundine est factum , ut in spongia talis potus ad crucis sublimia levaretur. Per arundinem vero Scriptura significabatur, quae implebatur hoc facto. Sicut enim lingua dicitur vel graeca vel latina, vel alia quaelibet sonum significans, qui lingua promitur; sic arundo dici potest littera, quae arundine scribitur. Sed sonos significantes vocis humanae usitatissime dicimus linguas: Scripturam vero arundinem dici, quo minus est usitatum, eo magis est mystice figuratum. Faciebat ista populus impius, patiebatur ista misericors Christus. Qui faciebat, quid faceret nesciebat: qui patiebatur autem, non solum quid fieret et cur fieret sciebat, verum etiam de male facientibus bene ipse faciebat.
119.6 PL 35, 1952
6. “When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, He said, It is finished.” What, but all that prophecy had foretold so long before? And then, because nothing now remained that still required to be done before He died, as if He, who had power to lay down His life and to take it up again, had at length completed all for whose completion He was waiting, “He bowed His head, and gave up the ghost.” Who can thus sleep when he pleases, as Jesus died when He pleased? Who is there that thus puts off his garment when he pleases, as He put off His flesh at His pleasure? Who is there that thus departs when he pleases, as He departed this life at His pleasure? How great the power, to be hoped for or dreaded, that must be His as judge, if such was the power He exhibited as a dying man!
Cum ergo accepisset Jesus acetum, dixit: Consummatum est. Quid, nisi quod prophetia tanto ante praedixerat? Deinde quia nihil remanserat quod antequam moreretur fieri adhuc oporteret, tanquam ille qui potestatem habebat ponendi animam suam, et iterum sumendi eam , peractis omnibus quae ut peragerentur exspectabat, Inclinato capite tradidit spiritum. Quis ita dormit quando voluerit, sicut Jesus mortuus est quando voluit? Quis ita vestem ponit quando voluerit, sicut se carne exuit quando voluit? Quis ita cum voluerit abit, quomodo cum voluit obiit? Quanta speranda vel timenda potestas est judicantis, si apparuit tanta morientis?