Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 94

sant'Agostino d'Ippona (354–430 d.C.) · In Joannis evangelium tractatus CXXIV · PL 35, 1379–1976

94.1 Chapter XVI. 4–7 PL 35, 1868

1. When the Lord Jesus had foretold His disciples the persecutions they would have to suffer after His departure, He went on to say: “And these things I said not unto you at the beginning, because I was with you; but now I go my way to Him that sent me.” And here the first thing we have to look at is, whether He had not previously foretold them of the sufferings that were to come. And the three other evangelists make it sufficiently clear that He had uttered such predictions prior to the approach of the supper: which was over, according to John, when He spake, and added, “And these things I said not unto you at the beginning, because I was with you.” Are we, then, to settle such a question in this way, that they, too, tell us that He was near His passion when He said these things? Then it was not when He was with them at the beginning that He so spake, for He was on the very eve of departing, and proceeding to the Father: and so also, even according to these evangelists, it is strictly true what is here said, “And these things I said not unto you at the beginning.” But what are we to do with the credibility of the Gospel according to Matthew, who relates that such announcements were made to them by the Lord, not only when He was on the eve of sitting down with His disciples to the passover supper, but also at the beginning, when the twelve apostles are for the first time expressed by name, and sent forth on the work of God? What, then, is the meaning of what He says here, “And these things I said not unto you at the beginning, because I was with you;” but that what He says here of the Holy Spirit who was to come to them, and to bear witness, when they should have such ills to endure, this He said not unto them at the beginning, because He was with themselves?

Cum Dominus Jesus praedixisset discipulis suis persecutiones quas passuri fuerant post ejus abscessum, subjunxit, atque ait: Haec autem vobis ab initio non dixi, quia vobiscum eram: nunc autem vado ad eum qui me misit. Ubi primum videndum est, utrum eis futuras non praedixerit ante passiones. Sed alii tres evangelistae satis eum praedixisse ista demonstrant, antequam ventum esset ad coenam : qua peracta secundum Joannem ista locutus est, ubi ait, Haec autem vobis ab initio non dixi, quia vobiscum eram. An forte hinc ista solvitur quaestio, quia et illi eum narrant passioni proximum fuisse cum haec diceret? Non ergo ab initio quando cum illis erat, quia jam discessurus, jamque ad Patrem perrecturus haec dixit: et ideo etiam secundum illos evangelistas verum est quod hic dictum est, Haec autem vobis ab initio non dixi. Sed quid agimus de fide Evangelii secundum Matthaeum, qui haec eis a Domino non solum cum jam esset Pascha cum discipulis coenaturus imminente passione, verum et ab initio denuntiata esse commemorat, ubi primum nominatim duodecim exprimuntur Apostoli, et ad opera divina mittuntur ? Quid sibi ergo vult quod hic ait, Haec autem vobis ab initio non dixi, quia vobiscum eram: nisi quia ea quae hic dicit de Spiritu sancto, quod sit venturus ad eos et testimonium perhibiturus, quando mala illa passuri sunt, haec ab initio eis non dixit, quia cum ipsis erat?

94.2 PL 35, 1868

2. The Comforter then, or Advocate (for both form the interpretation of the Greek word, paraclete), had become necessary on Christ’s departure: and therefore He had not spoken of Him at the beginning, when He was with them, because His own presence was their comfort; but on the eve of His own departure it behoved Him to speak of His coming, by whom it would be brought about that with love shed abroad in their hearts they would preach the word of God with all boldness; and with Him inwardly bearing witness with them of Christ, they also should bear witness, and feel it to be no cause of stumbling when their Jewish enemies put them out of the synagogues, and slew them, with the thought that they were doing God service; because the charity beareth all things, which was to be shed abroad in their hearts by the gift of the Holy Spirit. In this, therefore, is the whole meaning to be found, that He was to make them His martyrs, that is, His witnesses through the Holy Spirit; so that by His effectual working within them, they would endure the hardships of all kinds of persecution, and, set aglow at that divine fire, lose none of their warmth in the love of preaching. “These things,” therefore, He says, “have I told you, that, when their time shall come, ye may remember that I told you of them” (ver. 4). These things, I say, I have told you, not merely because ye shall have to endure such things, but because, when the Comforter is come, He shall bear witness of me, that ye may not keep them back through fear, and by whom ye yourselves shall also be enabled to bear witness. “And these things I said not unto you at the beginning, because I was with you,” and I myself was your comfort through my bodily presence exhibited to your human senses, and which, as infants, ye were able to comprehend.

Consolator ergo ille vel advocatus (utrumque enim interpretatur quod est graece paracletus), Christo abscedente fuerat necessarius; et ideo de illo non dixerat ab initio quando cum illis erat, quia ejus praesentia consolabantur: abscessurus autem oportebat ut diceret illum esse venturum, per quem futurum erat ut charitate diffusa in cordibus suis verbum Dei cum fiducia praedicarent; et illo intrinsecus apud eos testimonium perhibente de Christo, ipsi quoque testimonium perhiberent; neque scandalizarentur cum inimici Judaei absque synagogis facerent eos, et interficerent arbitrantes obsequium se praestare Deo: quoniam charitas omnia tolerat , quae diffundenda erat in cordibus eorum per Spiritus sancti donum . Hinc ergo iste totus ducitur sensus, quia facturus eos erat martyres suos, id est testes suos per Spiritum sanctum; ut illo in eis operante, persecutionum quaecumque aspera tolerarent, nec frigescerent a charitate praedicandi, illo divino igne succensi. Haec ergo, inquit, locutus sum vobis, ut cum venerit hora eorum, reminiscamini quia ego dixi vobis . Haec scilicet locutus sum vobis, non tantum quia passuri estis ista; sed quia cum venerit paracletus ille, testimonium perhibebit de me, ne ista timendo taceatis, unde fiet ut etiam vos testimonium perhibeatis. Haec autem vobis ab initio non dixi, quia vobiscum eram, et ego vos consolabar mea corporali praesentia, exhibita humanis sensibus vestris, quam parvuli capere poteratis.

94.3 PL 35, 1869

3. “But now I go my way to Him that sent me; and none of you,” He says, “asketh me, Whither goest Thou?” He means that His departure would be such that none would ask Him of that which they should see taking place in broad daylight before their eyes: for previously to this they had asked Him whither He was going, and had been answered that He was going whither they themselves could not then come. Now, however, He promises that He will go away in such a manner that none of them shall ask Him whither He goes. For a cloud received Him when He ascended up from their side; and of His going into heaven they made no verbal inquiry, but had ocular evidence.

Nunc autem vado ad eum qui me misit: et nemo, inquit, ex vobis interrogat me, Quo vadis? Significat sic se iturum ut nullus interrogaret, quod palam fieri visu corporis cernerent: nam superius interrogaverant eum quo esset iturus, et responderat eis se iturum quo ipsi tunc venire non possent . Nunc vero ita se promittit iturum, ut nullus eorum quo vadit interroget. Nubes enim suscepit eum quando ascendit ab eis; et euntem in coelum non verbis quaesierunt, sed oculis deduxerunt .

94.4 PL 35, 1869

4. “But because I have said these things unto you,” He adds, “sorrow hath filled your heart.” He saw, indeed, what effect these words of His were producing in their hearts; for having not yet within them the spiritual consolation, which they were afterwards to have by the Holy Spirit, what they still saw objectively in Christ they were afraid of losing; and because they could have no doubt they were about to lose Him whose announcements were always true, their human feelings were saddened, because their carnal view of Him was to be left a blank. But He knew what was most expedient for them, because that inward sight, wherewith the Holy Spirit was yet to comfort them, was undoubtedly superior; not by bringing a human body into the bodies of those who saw, but by infusing Himself into the hearts of those who believed. And then He adds, “Nevertheless I tell you the truth, it is expedient for you that I go away. For if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send Him unto you:” as if He had said, It is expedient for you that this form of a servant be taken away from you; as the Word made indeed flesh I dwell among you; but I would not that ye should continue to love me carnally, and, content with such milk, desire to remain infants always. “It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you.” If I withdraw not the tender nutriment wherewith I have nourished you, ye will acquire no keen relish of solid food; if ye adhere in a carnal way to the flesh, ye will not have room for the Spirit. For what is this, “If I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send Him unto you”? Was it that He could not send Him while located here Himself? Who would venture to say so? Neither was it, that where He was, thence the Other had withdrawn, or that He had so come from the Father as that He did not still abide with the Father. And still further, how could He, even when having His own abode on earth, be unable to send Him, who we know came and remained upon Him at His baptism; yea, more, from whom we know that He was never separable? What does it mean, then, “If I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you;” but that ye cannot receive the Spirit so long as ye continue to know Christ after the flesh? Hence one who had already been made a partaker of the Spirit says, “Though we have known Christ after the flesh, yet now henceforth know we [Him] no more.” For now even the very flesh of Christ he did not know in a carnal way, when brought to a spiritual knowledge of the Word that had been made flesh. And such, doubtless, did the good Master wish to intimate, when He said, “If I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send Him unto you.”

Sed quia haec locutus sum vobis, inquit, tristitia implevit cor vestrum. Videbat utique quid illa sua verba in eorum cordibus agerent: spiritualem quippe nondum interius habentes consolationem, quam per Spiritum sanctum fuerant habituri, id quod exterius in Christo videbant, amittere metuebant; et quia se amissuros esse illum vera denuntiantem dubitare non poterant, contristabatur humanus affectus, quia carnalis desolabatur aspectus. Noverat autem ille quid eis potius expediret, quia visus interior ipse est utique melior, quo eos consolaturus fuerat Spiritus sanctus; non cernentium corporibus ingesturus corpus humanum, sed seipsum credentium pectoribus infusurus. Denique adjungit, Sed ego veritatem dico vobis, expedit vobis ut ego vadam. Si enim non abiero, Paracletus non veniet ad vos: si autem abiero, mittam eum ad vos: tanquam diceret, Expedit vobis ut haec forma servi auferatur a vobis: caro quidem factum Verbum habito in vobis; sed nolo me carnaliter adhuc diligatis, et isto lacte contenti semper infantes esse cupiatis. Expedit vobis ut ego vadam. Si enim non abiero, Paracletus non veniet ad vos. Si alimenta tenera quibus vos alui, non subtraxero, solidum cibum non esurietis; si carni carnaliter haeseritis, capaces Spiritus non eritis. Nam quid est, Si non abiero, Paracletus non veniet ad vos: si autem abiero, mittam eum ad vos? Numquid hic positus, eum non poterat mittere? Quis hoc dixerit? Neque enim ubi ille erat, iste inde recesserat; et sic venerat a Patre, ut non maneret in Patre. Postremo, quomodo eum etiam hic constitutus non poterat mittere, quem scimus super eum baptizatum venisse atque mansisse ; imo vero a quo scimus eum nunquam separabilem fuisse? Quid est ergo, Si non abiero, Paracletus non veniet ad vos; nisi, non potestis capere Spiritum, quamdiu secundum carnem persistitis nosse Christum? Unde ille qui jam acceperat Spiritum: Etsi noveramus, inquit, secundum carnem Christum, sed nunc jam non novimus . Etiam ipsam quippe carnem Christi non secundum carnem novit, qui Verbum carnem factum spiritualiter novit. Hoc nimirum significare voluit magister bonus dicendo, Si enim non abiero, Paracletus non veniet ad vos: si autem abiero, mittam eum ad vos.

94.5 PL 35, 1869

5. But with Christ’s bodily departure, both the Father and the Son, as well as the Holy Spirit, were spiritually present with them. For had Christ departed from them in such a sense that it would be in His place, and not along with Him, that the Holy Spirit would be present in them, what becomes of His promise when He said, “Lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the world;” and, I and the Father “will come unto him, and will make Our abode with him;” seeing that He also promised that He would send the Holy Spirit in such a way that He would be with them for ever? In this way it was, on the other hand, that seeing they were yet out of their present carnal or animal condition to become spiritual, with undoubted certainty also were they yet to have in a more comprehensive way both the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit. But in no one are we to believe that the Father is present without the Son and the Holy Spirit, or the Father and the Son without the Holy Spirit, or the Son without the Father and the Holy Spirit, or the Holy Spirit without the Father and the Son, or the Father and the Holy Spirit without the Son; but wherever any one of Them is, there also is the Trinity, one God. But here the Trinity had to be suggested in such a way that, although there was no diversity of essence, yet the personal distinction of each one separately should be presented to notice; where those who have a right understanding can never imagine a separation of natures.

Christo autem discedente corporaliter, non solum Spiritus sanctus, sed et Pater et Filius illis adfuit spiritualiter. Nam si ab eis sic abscessit Christus, ut pro illo, non cum illo in eis esset Spiritus sanctus; ubi est ejus promissio dicentis, Ecce ego vobiscum sum usque in consummationem saeculi ; et, Veniemus ad eum ego et Pater, et mansionem apud eum faciemus : cum et Spiritum sanctum ita se promiserit esse missurum, ut cum eis esset in aeternum? Ac per hoc cum ex carnalibus vel animalibus essent spirituales futuri, profecto et Patrem et Filium et Spiritum sanctum capacius fuerant habituri. In nullo autem credendus est esse Pater sine Filio et Spiritu sancto, aut Pater et Filius sine Spiritu sancto, aut Filius sine Patre et Spiritu sancto, aut sine Patre et Filio Spiritus sanctus, aut Pater et Spiritus sanctus sine Filio: sed ubi eorum quilibet unus, ibi Trinitas Deus unus. Oportebat autem ita insinuari Trinitatem, ut quamvis nulla esset diversitas substantiarum, singillatim tamen commendaretur distinctio personarum; ubi eis qui recte intelligunt, nunquam videri potest separatio naturarum.

94.6 PL 35, 1870

6. But that which follows, “And when He is come, He will convince the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment: of sin, indeed, because they believe not on me; but of righteousness, because I go to the Father, and ye shall see me no more; and of judgment, because the prince of this world is judged” (vers. 8–11); as if it were sin simply not to believe on Christ; and as if it were very righteousness not to see Christ; and as if that were the very judgment, that the prince of this world, that is, the devil, is judged: all this is very obscure, and cannot be included in the present discourse, lest brevity only increase the obscurity; but must rather be deferred till another occasion for such explanation as the Lord may enable us to give.

Quod autem sequitur, Et cum venerit ille, arguet mundum de peccato, et de justitia, et de judicio: de peccato quidem, quia non credunt in me; de justitia vero, quia ad Patrem vado, et jam non videbitis me; de judicio autem, quia princeps hujus mundi judicatus est : tanquam solum sit peccatum non credere in Christum, et tanquam ipsa sit justitia non videre Christum, et tanquam ipsum sit judicium quod princeps hujus mundi, hoc est diabolus judicatus est: valde latebrosum est, nec isto sermone coarctandum, ne fiat obscurius brevitate; sed alio potius quantum Dominus adjuverit explicandum.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Salva per dopo

Inserisci la tua email: ti invieremo un link per accedere. Nessuna password. Ciò che salvi (voci, versetti, capitoli, documenti) ti segue su ogni dispositivo.