Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 86

sant'Agostino d'Ippona (354–430 d.C.) · In Joannis evangelium tractatus CXXIV · PL 35, 1379–1976

86.1 Chapter XV. 15, 16 PL 35, 1850

1. It is a worthy subject of inquiry how these words of the Lord are to be understood, “But I have called you friends: for all things that I have heard of my Father I have made known unto you.” For who is there that dare affirm or believe that any man knoweth all things that the only-begotten Son hath heard of the Father; when there is no one that can comprehend even how He heareth any word of the Father, being as He is Himself the only Word of the Father? Nay more, is it not the case that a little afterwards, in this same discourse, which He delivered to the disciples between the Supper and His passion, He said, “I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now”? How, then, are we to understand that He made known unto the disciples all that He had heard of the Father, when there are many things that He saith not, just because He knows that they cannot bear them now? Doubtless what He is yet to do He says that He has done as the same Being who hath made those things which are yet to be. For as He says by the prophet, “They pierced my hands and my feet,” and not, They will yet pierce; but speaking as it were of the past, and yet predicting what was still in the future: so also in the passage before us He declares that He has made known to the disciples all, that He knows He will yet make known in that fullness of knowledge, whereof the apostle says, “But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.” For in the same place he adds: “Now I know in part, but then shall I know, even as also I am known; and now through a glass in a riddle, but then face to face.” For the same apostle also says that we have been saved by the washing of regeneration, and yet declares in another place, “We are saved by hope: but hope that is seen is no hope; for what a man seeth, why doth he yet hope for? But if we hope for that we see not, then do we with patience wait for it.” To a similar purpose it is also said by his fellow-apostle Peter, “In whom, though now seeing Him not, ye believe; and in whom, when ye see Him, ye shall rejoice with a joy unspeakable and glorious: receiving the reward of faith, even the salvation of your souls.” If, then, it is now the season of faith, and faith’s reward is the salvation of our souls; who, in that faith which worketh by love, can doubt that the day must come to an end, and at its close the reward be received; not only the redemption of our body, whereof the Apostle Paul speaketh, but also the salvation of our souls, as we are told by the Apostle Peter? For the felicity springing from both is at this present time, and in the existing state of mortality, a matter rather of hope than of actual possession. But this it concerns us to remember, that our outward man, to wit the body, is still decaying; but the inward, that is, the soul, is being renewed day by day. Accordingly, while we are waiting for the immortality of the flesh and salvation of our souls in the future, yet with the pledge we have received, it may be said that we are saved already; so that knowledge of all things which the Only-begotten hath heard of the Father we are to regard as a matter of hope still lying in the future, although declared by Christ as something He had already imparted.

Merito quaeritur quomodo accipiendum sit quod ait Dominus, Vos autem dixi amicos; quia omnia quaecumque audivi a Patre meo, nota feci vobis. Quis enim audeat affirmare vel credere ullum hominum scire omnia quaecumque a Patre audivit unigenitus Filius; quando ne hoc quidem quisquam capit, quomodo a Patre audiat ullum verbum, cum ipse sit Patris unicum Verbum? Quid, quod aliquanto post, in hoc ipso tamen sermone, quem post coenam ante passionem ad discipulos habuit, Multa, inquit, habeo vobis dicere; sed non potestis illa portare modo ? Quo igitur pacto intellecturi sumus omnia eum nota fecisse discipulis, quaecumque audivit a Patre, cum propterea quaedam multa non dicat, quia scit eos modo portare non posse? Sed nimirum quod facturus est, fecisse se dicit, qui ea quae futura sunt fecit . Sicut enim dicit per prophetam, Foderunt manus meas et pedes meos ; nec ait, fossuri sunt; velut praeterita dicens, et ea tamen futura praedicens: ita et hoc loco ait omnia se nota fecisse discipulis, quae se novit nota esse facturum in illa plenitudine scientiae, de qua dicit Apostolus, Cum autem venerit quod perfectum est, quod ex parte est evacuabitur. Ibi quippe dicit: Nunc scio ex parte, tunc autem cognoscam sicut et cognitus sum; et nunc per speculum in aenigmate, tunc autem facie ad faciem . Nam et ipse Apostolus salvos nos dicit esse factos per lavacrum regenerationis : qui tamen alio loco, Spe, inquit, salvi facti sumus. Spes autem quae videtur, non est spes: quod enim videt quis, quid sperat? Si autem quod non videmus speramus, per patientiam exspectamus . Unde etiam ejus coapostolus Petrus: In quem modo, inquit, non videntes creditis; quem cum videritis, exsultabitis gaudio inenarrabili et honorato, percipientes mercedem fidei, salutem animarum vestrarum . Si ergo nunc tempus est fidei, salus autem animarum merces est fidei; quis dubitet in fide, quae per dilectionem operatur , peragendum diem, atque in fine dici recipiendam esse mercedem, non solum redemptionem corporis nostri, de qua dicit apostolus Paulus ; verum etiam salutem animarum nostrarum, de qua dicit Apostolus Petrus? Utriusque enim rei felicitas isto tempore atque in hac mortalitate in spe potius habetur, quam in re tenetur. Verum hoc interest, quod exterior noster homo, id est corpus, adhuc corrumpitur; interior autem, id est anima, jam renovatur de die in diem . Itaque sicut immortalitatem carnis et salutem animarum futuram exspectamus, quamvis jam pignore accepto salvi facti esse dicamur; ita omnium notitiam quaecumque Unigenitus audivit a Patre, futuram sperare debemus, quamvis hoc jam se fecisse dixerit Christus.

86.2 PL 35, 1851

2. “Ye have not chosen me,” He says, “but I have chosen you.” Grace such as that is ineffable. For what were we so long as Christ had not yet chosen us, and we were therefore still destitute of love? For he who hath chosen Him, how can he love Him? Were we, think you, in that condition which is sung of in the psalm: “I had rather be an abject in the house of the Lord, than dwell in the tents of wickedness”? Certainly not. What were we then, but sinful and lost? We had not yet come to believe on Him, in order to lead to His choosing us; for if it were those who already believed that He chose, then was He chosen Himself, prior to His choosing. But how could He say, “Ye have not chosen me,” save only because His mercy anticipated us? Here surely is at fault the vain reasoning of those who defend the foreknowledge of God in opposition to His grace, and with this view declare that we were chosen before the foundation of the world, because God foreknew that we should be good, but not that He Himself would make us good. So says not He, who declares, “Ye have not chosen me.” For had He chosen us on the ground that He foreknew that we should be good, then would He also have foreknown that we would not be the first to make choice of Him. For in no other way could we possibly be good: unless, forsooth, one could be called good who has never made good his choice. What was it then that He chose in those who were not good? For they were not chosen because of their goodness, inasmuch as they could not be good without being chosen. Otherwise grace is no more grace, if we maintain the priority of merit. Such, certainly, is the election of grace, whereof the apostle says: “Even so then at this present time also there is a remnant saved according to the election of grace.” To which he adds: “And if by grace, then is it no more of works; otherwise grace is no more grace.” Listen, thou ungrateful one, listen: “Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you.” Not that thou mayest say, I am chosen because I already believed. For if thou wert believing in Him, then hadst thou already chosen Him. But listen: “Ye have not chosen me.” Not that thou mayest say, Before I believed I was already doing good works, and therefore was I chosen. For what good work can be prior to faith, when the apostle says, “Whatsoever is not of faith is sin”? What, then, are we to say on hearing such words, “Ye have not chosen me,” but that we were evil, and were chosen in order that we might be good through the grace of Him who chose us? For it is not by grace, if merit preceded: but it is of grace: and therefore that grace did not find, but effected the merit.

Non vos me elegistis, inquit, sed ego vos elegi. Haec est illa ineffabilis gratia. Quid enim eramus quando Christum nondum elegeramus, et ideo non diligebamus? Nam qui eum non elegit, quomodo diligit? Numquid jam in nobis erat quod in Psalmo canitur: Elegi abjectus esse in domo Domini, magis quam habitare in tabernaculis peccatorum ? Non utique. Quid ergo eramus, nisi iniqui et perditi? Neque enim jam credideramus in eum, ut eligeret nos: nam si jam credentes elegit, electus elegit. Cur ergo diceret, Non vos me elegistis, nisi quia misericordia ejus praevenit nos ? Hic certe vacat vana illorum ratiocinatio, qui praescientiam Dei defendunt contra gratiam Dei, et ideo dicunt nos electos ante mundi constitutionem , quia praescivit nos Deus futuros bonos, non seipsum nos facturum bonos. Non hoc dicit, qui dicit, Non vos me elegistis. Quoniam si propterea nos elegisset, quia bonos futuros esse nos praesciverat; simul etiam praescisset quod eum non fuissemus prius electuri. Non enim aliter esse possemus boni: nisi forte dicendus est bonus qui non elegit bonum. Quid ergo elegit in non bonis? Non enim electi sunt quia boni fuerunt, qui boni non essent nisi electi essent. Alioquin gratia jam non est gratia, si praecessisse contendimus merita. Haec quippe electio gratiae est, de qua dicit Apostolus: Sic ergo et in hoc tempore reliquiae per electionem gratiae salvae factae sunt. Unde subjungit: Si autem gratia, jam non ex operibus; alioquin gratia jam non est gratia . Audi, ingrate, audi: Non vos me elegistis, sed ego elegi vos. Non est ut dicas, Ideo electus sum, quia jam credebam. Si enim credebas in eum, jam elegeras eum. Sed audi: Non vos me elegistis. Non est ut dicas, Antequam crederem, jam bona operabar, ideo electus sum. Quid enim est boni operis ante fidem, cum dicat Apostolus, Omne quod non est ex fide, peccatum est ? Quid ergo dicturi sumus audiendo, Non vos me elegistis; nisi quia mali eramus et electi sumus, ut boni per gratiam nos eligentis essemus? Non est enim gratia, si praecesserant merita: est autem gratia; haec igitur non invenit, sed effecit merita.

86.3 PL 35, 1852

3. See then, beloved, how it is that He chooseth not the good, but maketh those whom He has chosen good. “I have chosen you,” He saith, “and appointed you that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and [that] your fruit should remain.” And is not that the fruit, whereof He had already said, “Without me ye can do nothing”? He hath chosen therefore, and appointed that we should go and bring forth fruit; and no fruit, accordingly, had we to induce His choice of us. “That ye should go,” He said, “and bring forth fruit.” We go to bring forth, and He Himself is the way wherein we go, and wherein He hath appointed us to go. And so His mercy hath anticipated us in all. “And that your fruit,” He saith, “should remain; that whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in my name, He may give it you.” Accordingly let love remain; for He Himself is our fruit. And this love lies at present in longing desire, not yet in fullness of enjoyment; and whatsoever with that longing desire we shall ask in the name of the only-begotten Son, the Father giveth us. But what is not expedient for our salvation to receive, let us not imagine that we ask that in the Saviour’s name: but we ask in the name of the Saviour only that which really belongs to the way of salvation.

Et videte, charissimi, quemadmodum non eligat bonos, sed quos elegit, faciat bonos. Ego, inquit, elegi vos, et posui vos ut eatis, et fructum afferatis, et fructus vester maneat. Nonne iste est fructus de quo jam dixerat, Sine me nihil potestis facere ? Elegit ergo, et posuit ut eamus, et fructum afferamus: nullum itaque fructum unde nos eligeret habebamus. Ut eatis, inquit, et fructum afferatis. Imus ut afferamus, et ipse est via qua imus, in qua nos posuit ut eamus. Proinde in omnibus misericordia ejus praevenit nos. Et fructus, inquit, vester maneat: ut quodcumque petieritis Patrem in nomine meo, det vobis. Maneat ergo dilectio; ipse est enim fructus noster. Quae dilectio nunc est in desiderio, nondum in saturitate: et ipso desiderio quodcumque petierimus in nomine unigeniti Filii, dat nobis Pater. Quod autem accipere salvandis non expedit nobis, non existimemus nos petere in nomine Salvatoris: sed hoc petimus in nomine Salvatoris, quod pertinet ad rationem salutis.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Salva per dopo

Inserisci la tua email: ti invieremo un link per accedere. Nessuna password. Ciò che salvi (voci, versetti, capitoli, documenti) ti segue su ogni dispositivo.