The Letters of St. Jerome 27
27.0 To Marcella PL 22, 431
27.1 To Marcella PL 22, 431
1. After I had written my former letter, containing a few remarks on some Hebrew words, a report suddenly reached me that certain contemptible creatures were deliberately assailing me with the charge that I had endeavored to correct passages in the gospels, against the authority of the ancients and the opinion of the whole world. Now, though I might—as far as strict right goes—treat these persons with contempt (it is idle to play the lyre for an ass), yet, lest they should follow their usual habit and reproach me with superciliousness, let them take my answer as follows: I am not so dull-wilted nor so coarsely ignorant (qualities which they take for holiness, calling themselves the disciples of fishermen as if men were made holy by knowing nothing)—I am not, I repeat, so ignorant as to suppose that any of the Lord’s words is either in need of correction or is not divinely inspired; but the Latin manuscripts of the Scriptures are proved to be faulty by the variations which all of them exhibit, and my object has been to restore them to the form of the Greek original, from which my detractors do not deny that they have been translated. If they dislike water drawn from the clear spring, let them drink of the muddy streamlet, and when they come to read the Scriptures, let them lay aside the keen eye which they turn on woods frequented by game-birds and waters abounding in shellfish. Easily satisfied in this instance alone, let them, if they will, regard the words of Christ as rude sayings, albeit that over these so many great intellects have labored for so many ages rather to divine than to expound the meaning of each single word. Let them charge the great apostle with want of literary skill, although it is said of him that much learning made him mad.
Omnia verba Scripturae divinitus inspirata. Vitiositas Codicum latinorum ad Graecam originem revocanda. --Post priorem Epistolam, in qua de Hebraeis verbis pauca perstrinxeram, ad me repente perlatum est, quosdam homunculos mihi studiose detrahere, cur adversum auctoritatem veterum, et totius mundi opinionem, aliqua in Evangeliis emendare tentaverim. Quos ego cum possem meo jure contemnere (Asino quippe lyra superflue canit) tamen ne nos superbiae, ut facere solent, arguant ita responsum habeant: Non adeo me hebetis fuisse cordis, et tam erasse rusticitatis (quam illi solam pro sanctitate habent, piscatorum se discipulos asserentes, quasi idcirco sancti sint, si nihil scierint) ut aliquid de Dominicis verbis, aut corrigendum putaverim, aut non divinitus inspiratum; sed Latinorum 134 codicum vitiositatem, quae ex diversitate librorum omnium comprobatur, ad Graecam originem, unde et ipsi translata non denegant, voluisse revocare. Quibus si displicet fontis unda purissimi, coenosos rivulsos bibant; et diligentiam qua avium silvas, et concharum gurgites norunt, in Scripturis legendis abjiciant: sintque in hac re tantum simplices, ut Christi verba existiment rusticana, in quibus per tanta jam saecula, tantorum ingenia sudaverunt, ut rationem verbi uniuscujusque [al. unusquisque ] magis opinati sint, quam expresserint. Apostolum arguant imperitiae, qui ob multas litteras insanire dicatur.
27.2 PL 22, 432
2. I know that as you read these words you will knit your brows, and fear that my freedom of speech is sowing the seeds of fresh quarrels; and that, if you could, you would gladly put your finger on my mouth to prevent me from even speaking of things which others do not blush to do. But, I ask you, wherein have I used too great license? Have I ever embellished my dinner plates with engravings of idols? Have I ever, at a Christian banquet, set before the eyes of virgins the polluting spectacle of Satyrs embracing bacchanals? or have I ever assailed any one in too bitter terms? Have I ever complained of beggars turned millionaires? Have I ever censured heirs for the funerals which they have given to their benefactors? The one thing that I have unfortunately said has been that virgins ought to live more in the company of women than of men, and by this I have made the whole city look scandalized and caused every one to point at me the finger of scorn. “They that hate me without a cause are more than the hairs of mine head,” and I am become “a proverb to them.” Do you suppose after this that I will now say anything rash?
Scio te cum ista legeris, rugare frontem, et libertatem meam rursum seminarium timere rixarum; ac meum, si fieri potest, os digito velle comprimere, ne audeam dicere, quae alii facere non erubescunt. Rogo quid a nobis libere dictum est? Nunquid in lancibus idola caelata descripsi? nunquid inter epulas Christianas, virginalibus oculis Baccharum Satyrorumque complexus innexui: aut unquam aliquem amarior sermo pulsavit? Nunquid ex mendicis divites fieri doluimus? nunquid reprehendi haereditarias sepulturas? Unum miser locutus, quod virgines saepius deberent cum mulieribus esse, quam cum masculis, totius oculos urbis offendi, cunctorum digitis notor. « Multiplicati sunt super capillos capitis mei, qui oderunt me gratis, et factus sum eis in parabolam » : et tu putas me aliquid deinceps locuturum?
27.3 PL 22, 432
3. But “when I set the wheel rolling I began to form a wine flagon; how comes it that a waterpot is the result?” Lest Horace laugh at me I come back to my two-legged asses, and din into their ears, not the music of the lute, but the blare of the trumpet. They may say if they will, “rejoicing in hope; serving the time,” but we will say “rejoicing in hope; serving the Lord.” They may see fit to receive an accusation against a presbyter unconditionally; but we will say in the words of Scripture, “Against an elder receive not an accusation, but before two or three witnesses. Them that sin rebuke before all.” They may choose to read, “It is a man’s saying, and worthy of all acceptation;” we are content to err with the Greeks, that is to say with the apostle himself, who spoke Greek. Our version, therefore, is, it is “a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation.” Lastly, let them take as much pleasure as they please in their Gallican “geldings;” we will be satisfied with the simple “ass” of Zechariah, loosed from its halter and made ready for the Saviour’s service, which received the Lord on its back, and so fulfilled Isaiah’s prediction: “Blessed is he that soweth beside all waters, where the ox and the ass tread under foot.”
Verum ne Flaccus de nobis rideat: « Amphora coepit Institui, currente rota, cur urceus exit? » revertimur ad nostros bipedes asellos; et illorum in aure buccinna magis quam cithara concrepamus. Illi legant, « spe gaudentes, tempori servientes: » nos legamus, « spe gaudentes, Domino servientes » . Illi adversus Presbyterum accusationem omnino putent recipiendam: nos legamus, « adversus Presbyterum accusationem ne receperis, nisi sub duobus, 135 aut tribus testibus: peccantes autem coram omnibus argue » . Illis placeat, « Humanus sermo et omni acceptione dignus: » nos cum Graecis, id est, cum Apostolo, qui Graece locutus est, erremus: « Fidelis sermo, et omni acceptione dignus. » Ad extremum illi gaudeant Gallicis Cantheriis; nos solutus vinculis, et in Salvatoris ministerium praeparatus Zachariae asellus ille delectet, qui postquam Domino terga praebuit, coepit Isaiae consonare vaticinio: « Beatus qui seminat secus omnem aquam, ubi bos et asinus calcant » .