A Commentary on the Apostles' Creed 11

Rufinus of Aquileia (AD 345–411) · Commentarius in Symbolum apostolorum · PL 21, 337–386

11 Section 11 PL 21, 350

11. These things, since they are asserted upon the warrant of the Prophetical Scriptures, may possibly silence the Jews, infidel and incredulous though they be. But the Pagans are wont to ridicule us when they hear us speak of a Virgin-birth. We must, therefore, say a few words in reply to their cavils. Every birth, I suppose, depends upon three conditions. There must be a woman of mature age, she must have intercourse with a man, her womb must not be barren. Of these three conditions, in the birth of which we are speaking, one was wanting, the man. And this, forasmuch as He of Whose birth we speak was not an earthly but a heavenly man, was supplied by the Heavenly Spirit, the virginity of the mother being preserved inviolate. And yet why should it be thought marvellous for a virgin to conceive, when it is well known that the Eastern bird, which they call the Phœnix, is in such wise born, or born again, without the intervention of a mate, that it remains continually one, and continually by being born or born again succeeds itself? That bees know no wedlock, and no bringing forth of young, is notorious. There are also other things which are found to be subject to some such law of birth. Shall it be thought incredible, then, that was done by divine power, for the renewal and restoration of the whole world, of which instances are observed in the nativity of animals? And yet it is strange that the Gentiles should think this impossible, who believe their own Minerva to have been born from the brain of Jupiter. What is more difficult to believe, or what more contrary to nature? Here, there is a woman, the order of nature is kept, there is conception, and in due time birth; there, there is no female, but a man alone, and—birth! Why does he who believes the one marvel at the other? Again, they say that Father Bacchus was born from Jupiter’s thigh. Here is another portent, yet it is believed. Venus also, whom they call Aphrodite, was born, they believe, of the foam of the sea, as her compounded name shews. They affirm that Castor and Pollux were born of an egg, the Myrmidons of ants. There are a thousand other things which, though contrary to nature, find credit with them, such as the stones thrown by Deucalion and Pyrrha, and the crop of men sprung from thence. And when they believe such myths and so many of them, does one thing seem impossible to them, that a woman of mature age, not defiled by man but impregnated by the Holy Ghost, should conceive a divine progeny? who, forsooth, if they are hard of belief, ought in no wise to have given credence to those prodigies, being, as they are, so many and so degrading; but if they do believe them, they ought much more readily to receive these beliefs of ours, so honourable and so holy, than theirs so discreditable and so vile.

Verum haec quia ex Scripturis propheticis asseruntur, possunt forte Judaeos, quamvis sint infideles et increduli, confutare. Sed pagani solent irridere nos, cum audiunt praedicari a nobis Virginis partum: propter quod paucis eorum obtrectationibus respondendum est. Omnis partus ex tribus (ut opinor) constat: si adultae aetatis sit femina, si virum adeat, si non sit illius vulva vitio sterilitatis occlusa. Ex his tribus in hoc partu, quem praedicamus, unum defuit, vir scilicet: et hanc partem (quia qui nascebatur non erat terrenus homo, sed caelestis) per spiritum caelestem dicimus, salva Virginis incorruptione, completam. Et tamen quid mirum videtur, si virgo conceperit, cum Orientis avem, quam Phoenicem vocant, in tantum sine conjuge nasci, vel renasci constet, ut semper 74 una sit, et semper sibi ipsi [Al. ipsa] nascendo, vel renascendo succedat? Apes certe nescire conjugia, nec foetus nixibus edere, omnibus palam est. Sed et alia nonnulla deprehenduntur sub hujusmodi sorte nascendi. Hoc ergo incredibile videbitur divina virtute ad totius mundi reintegrationem factum, cujus exempla etiam in animalium nativitate cernuntur? Et tamen mirandum est [Al. tacetur est], cur hoc Gentilibus impossibile videatur, qui credunt Minervam suam de cerebro Jovis natam. Quid ad credendum difficilius, aut quid magis contra naturam est? Hic femina est, hic naturae ordo servatur, hic conceptus, hic [Al. et] partus temporibus suis editur: ibi nusquam femineus sexus, sed vir solus et partus. Qui illa credit, cur ista miratur [Al. miretur]? Sed et Liberum patrem dicunt de femore ejus natum. Ecce aliud portenti genus, et tamen creditur. Venerem quoque, quam Aphroditen vocant, de spuma maris, sicut et omnis ejus compositio ostendit, credunt esse progenitam. De ovo natum Castorem Pollucemque confirmant, et ex formica [Al. formicis] Myrmidones: et alia mille sunt, quae quamvis contra naturam rerum venientia, ipsis tamen sunt visa credibilia, ut Deucalionis et Pyrrhae lapides jactos, et hominum ex his segetem natam. Et cum haec tot et alia figmenta crediderint, unum eis impossibile videtur, quod adolescens femina, divinum germen, non hominis vitio, sed Deo spirante conceperit. Qui utique si ad credendum difficiles sunt, illis tot et tam turpibus monstris fidem nequaquam commendare debuerant. Si vero faciles sunt ad credendum, multo promptius haec nostra tam honesta et tam sancta recipere, quam illa tam indigna et tam foeda credere debuissent.

Philip Schaff and Henry Wace (eds.), New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1890-1900. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Save for later

Enter your email and we will send you a sign-in link. No password. What you save (articles, verses, chapters, documents) follows you to any device.