ISTANZIO. - Among the disciples of Priscillian, the bishop I. deserves special attention because the 11 treatises discovered by G. Schepss and published in CSEL, 18 (1889) have been attributed to him rather than to the head of the sect. Written on an apologetic plan, they do not contain great things that reveal the heresy of which his contemporaries accused Priscillian.For this reason, Morin attributed them to I., but the solution of the learned Benedictine patrologist did not satisfy everyone; and the authorship of the treatises mentioned is still a subject of discussion.
BibliographyG. Morin, Pro I. contre l'attribution à Priscillien des opuscules du manuscrit de Würzburg, in Rev. bénédictine, 30 (1913), pp. 133-73. Agai
BIBL.: G. Morin, Pro I. contre l'attribution à Priscillien des opuscules du manuscrit de Würzburg, in Rev. bénédictine, 30 (1913), pp. 133-73. Against Morin stands J. Martin, Priscillian oder I., in Hist. Jahrbuch, 33 (1912), pp. 237-51.
Madoz, Giuseppe. “Istanzio.” In Enciclopedia Cattolica, vol. VII, col. 332. Città del Vaticano: Ente per l’Enciclopedia Cattolica e per il Libro Cattolico, 1951. https://azioneromana.com/article/istanzio.
MLA
Madoz, Giuseppe. “Istanzio.” Enciclopedia Cattolica, vol. VII, Ente per l’Enciclopedia Cattolica e per il Libro Cattolico, 1951, col. 332. Azione Romana, https://azioneromana.com/article/istanzio.
BibTeX
@incollection{ec7_istanzio,
author = {Madoz, Giuseppe},
title = {Istanzio},
booktitle = {Enciclopedia Cattolica},
volume = {VII},
pages = {332},
note = {Cited by column},
publisher = {Ente per l’Enciclopedia Cattolica e per il Libro Cattolico},
address = {Città del Vaticano},
year = {1951},
url = {https://azioneromana.com/article/istanzio}
}
One of some 20,000 entries brought back from the twelve printed volumes (1948–54). Spotted something? Help us improve it.
Click or scroll to zoom · drag to pan · Esc to close