Letters179 Letter CLXXIX. To thk same, on behalf ok the same (A.D. 1139)
Letter CLXXIX. To thk same, on behalf ok the same (A.D. 1139)
He maintains the cause of Albero, Archbishop of Treves, against flic Abbot of S. Maximin and his rebellious monks.
Is it possible that wickedness can thus overcome wisdom? You know, holy Father, you know the Archbishop of Treves. I am sure that you know him. But do you know also that unholy Abbot of the holy Maximin? I suspect that you do not. Who is worthier of honour than the first? Who more deserving of shame than the second? Yet the latter has been honoured, the former given to reproach. How has the Archbishop sinned? He has recovered the goods plundered from his Church, he has freed his captive Church from lay-hands. Why is evil returned him for his good, and hatred for his goodwill? Let your loving eye, I pray you, rest on this; lay aside for a moment your other occupations, and consider what he has been robbed of; that such a man as the one—I am ashamed to say what he is—should hold up to scorn to his neighbours and enemies such a man as yourself know the Archbishop to be. Holy Father, it is filial affection which speaks. So far I have sympathized with the unhappy and much-to-be-pitied Archbishop. But if after this, this injustice is not rectified, the grief of my heart, and my deep compassion will wholly pass over to him by whom it could have been rectified. There are other wrongs done to the same man, and in alleviating them you will undoubtedly be labouring for yourself. Whatever stains the name of my most sweet Lord pierces my heart.
Quomodo malitia vincit sapientiam? Nosti, pie domine, nosti Treverensem archiepiscopum? scio quia nosti. Nosti et illum Sancti-Maximini non sanctum abbatem? Puto quia non nosti. Quis dignior honore illo priori? sic nemo confusione dignior isto sequenti: et tamen iste honoratus est, ille opprobrio latus. Quid peccavit archiepiscopus? Praedam Ecclesiae suae recuperavit, captivam Ecclesiam de manu laica liberavit. Nunquid pro bono redditur malum, et odium pro dilectione? Hic, quaeso, hic evigilet oculus pietatis, et semotis paulisper occupationibus consideret, quantum subreptum sit ei, ut talis, qualem pudet dicere, talem qualem tu ipse nosti, faciat opprobrium vicinis suis, inimicis tuis. Piissime Pater, affectus filialis loquitur. Hucusque condoluimus misero et miserabili archiepiscopo. Verum ex hoc jam si non fuerit emendatum, dolor cordis nostri et compassio ex intimis medullis, tota transibit ad illum, per quem potuit emendari. Sunt et aliae laesiones praefati viri, quas cum ei allevia-veritis, vobis procul dubio laborabitis. Quidquid dulcissimi domini mei nomen decolorat, cor meum excoriat.