Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 82
82.1 Chapter XV. 8–10 PL 35, 1842
1. The Saviour, in thus speaking to the disciples, commends still more and more the grace whereby we are saved, when He says, “Herein is my Father glorified, that ye bear very much fruit, and be made my disciples.” Whether we say glorified, or made bright, both are the rendering given us of one Greek verb, namely doxazein (δοξάζειν). For what is doxa (δόξα) in Greek, is in Latin glory. I have thought it worth while to mention this, because the apostle says, “If Abraham was justified by works, he hath glory, but not before God.” For this is the glory before God, whereby God, and not man, is glorified, when he is justified, not by works, but by faith, so that even his doing well is imparted to him by God; just as the branch, as I have stated above, cannot bear fruit of itself. For if herein God the Father is glorified, that we bear much fruit, and be made the disciples of Christ, let us not credit our own glory therewith, as if we had it of ourselves. For of Him is such a grace, and accordingly therein the glory is not ours, but His. Hence also, in another passage, after saying, “Let your light so shine before men that they may see your good works;” to keep them from the thought that such good works were of themselves, He immediately added, “and may glorify your Father who is in heaven.” For herein is the Father glorified, that we bear much fruit, and be made the disciples of Christ. And by whom are we so made, but by Him whose mercy hath forestalled us? For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works.
Magis magisque Salvator gratiam qua salvamur discipulis loquendo commendans: In hoc, inquit, clarificatus est Pater meus, ut fructum plurimum afferatis, et efficiamini mei discipuli. Sive glorificatus sive clarificatus dicatur, ex uno graeco verbo utrumque translatum est, quod est δοξάζειν Δόξα enim quae graece dicitur, latine gloria est. Quod ideo commemorandum existimavi, quia dicit Apostolus, Si Abraham ex operibus justificatus est, habet gloriam, sed non ad Deum . Haec est ad Deum gloria qua glorificatur non homo, sed Deus, si non ex operibus, sed ex fide justificatur, ut ex Deo illi sit quod etiam bene operatur: quoniam palmes, sicut jam superius dixi, non potest ferre fructum a semetipso . Si enim in hoc clarificatus est Deus Pater ut fructum plurimum afferamus, et efficiamur Christi discipuli; non hoc gloriae nostrae tribuamus, tanquam hoc ex nobis ipsis habeamus. Ejus est enim haec gratia, et ideo in hoc non nostra, sed ejus est gloria. Unde et alibi cum dixisset, Sic luceat lumen vestrum coram hominibus, ut videant opera vestra bona; ne a semetipsis putarent esse bona opera sua, mox addidit, Et glorificent Patrem vestrum qui in coelis est . In hoc enim glorificatur Pater ut fructum plurimum afferamus, et efficiamur Christi discipuli. A quo efficimur, nisi ab illo cujus misericordia praevenit nos? Ipsius enim figmentum sumus, creati in Christo Jesu in operibus bonis .
82.2 PL 35, 1843
2. “As the Father hath loved me,” He says, “so have I loved you: continue ye in my love.” Here, then, you see, is the source of our good works. For whence should we have them, were it not that faith worketh by love? And how should we love, were it not that we were first loved? With striking clearness is this declared by the same evangelist in his epistle: “We love God because He first loved us.” But when He says, “As the Father hath loved me, so have I loved you,” He indicates no such equality between our nature and His as there is between Himself and the Father, but the grace whereby the Mediator between God and men is the man Christ Jesus. For He is pointed out as Mediator when He says, “The Father—me, and I—you.” For the Father, indeed, also loveth us, but in Him; for herein is the Father glorified, that we bear fruit in the vine, that is, in the Son, and so be made His disciples.
Sicut dilexit me Pater, inquit, et ego dilexi vos: manete in dilectione mea. Ecce unde sunt nobis opera bona. Nam unde nobis essent, nisi quia fides per dilectionem operatur ? Unde autem diligeremus, nisi prius diligeremur? Apertissime hoc in Epistola sua idem iste evangelista dixit: Nos diligamus Deum, quoniam ipse prior dilexit nos . Quod autem ait, Sicut dilexit me Pater, et ego dilexi vos; non aequalitatem naturae ostendit nostrae et suae, sicut est Patris et ipsius, sed gratiam qua mediator Dei et hominum est homo Christus Jesus . Mediator quippe monstratur, cum dicit, me Pater, et ego vos. Nam Pater utique diligit et nos, sed in ipso; quia in hoc glorificatur Pater, ut fructum afferamus in vite, hoc est in Filio, et efficiamur ejus discipuli.
82.3 PL 35, 1843
3. “Continue ye,” He says, “in my love.” How shall we continue? Listen to what follows: “If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love.” Love brings about the keeping of His commandments; but does the keeping of His commandments bring about love? Who can doubt that it is love which precedes? For he has no true ground for keeping the commandments who is destitute of love. And so, in saying, “If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love,” He shows not the source from which love springs, but the means whereby it is manifested. As if He said, Think not that ye abide in my love if ye keep not my commandments; for it is only if ye have kept them that ye shall abide. In other words, it will thus be made apparent that ye shall abide in my love if ye keep my commandments. So that no one need deceive himself by saying that he loveth Him, if he keepeth not His commandments. For we love Him just in the same measure as we keep His commandments; and the less we keep them, the less we love. And although, when He saith, “Continue ye in my love,” it is not apparent what love He spake of; whether the love we bear to Him, or that which He bears to us: yet it is seen at once in the previous clause. For He had there said, “So have I loved you;” and to these words He immediately adds, “Continue ye in my love:” accordingly, it is that love which He bears to us. What, then, do the words mean, “Continue ye in my love,” but just, continue ye in my grace? And what do these mean, “If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love,” but, hereby shall ye know that ye shall abide in the love which I bear to you, if ye keep my commandments? It is not, then, for the purpose of awakening His love to us that we first keep His commandments; but this, that unless He loves us, we cannot keep His commandments. This is a grace which lies all disclosed to the humble, but is hid from the proud.
Manete, inquit, in dilectione mea. Quomodo manebimus? Audi quid sequitur: Si praecepta mea, inquit, servaveritis, manebitis in dilectione mea. Dilectio facit praecepta servari, an praecepta servata faciunt dilectionem? Sed quis ambigat quod dilectio praecedit? Unde enim praecepta servet non habet, qui non diligit. Quod ergo ait, Si praecepta mea servaveritis, manebitis in dilectione mea, ostendit non unde dilectio generetur, sed unde monstretur. Tanquam diceret, Nolite vos putare manere in dilectione mea, si non servatis praecepta mea: si enim servaveritis, manebitis. Hoc est, hinc apparebit quod in dilectione mea manebitis, si praecepta mea servabitis. Ut nemo se fallat, dicendo quod eum diligat, si ejus praecepta non servat. Nam in tantum eum diligimus, in quantum ejus praecepta servamus: in quantum autem minus servamus, minus diligimus. Quamvis quod ait, Manete in dilectione mea, non apparet quam dixerit dilectionem, utrum qua eum diligimus, an qua ipse diligit nos: sed ex verbo superiore dignoscitur. Dixerat quippe, Et ego dilexi vos; cui verbo continuo subjunxit, Manete in dilectione mea: illa ergo qua dilexit nos. Quid est ergo, Manete in dilectione mea, nisi, manete in gratia mea? Et quid est, Si praecepta mea servaveritis, manebitis in dilectione mea, nisi, ex hoc scietis quod in dilectione mea qua vos diligo, manebitis, si praecepta mea servabitis? Non ergo ut nos diligat, prius ejus praecepta servamus; sed nisi nos diligat, praecepta ejus servare non possumus. Haec est gratia quae humilibus patet, superbos latet.
82.4 PL 35, 1844
4. But what are we to make of that which follows: “Even as I have kept my Father’s commandments, and abide in His love”? Here also He certainly intended us to understand that fatherly love wherewith He was loved of the Father. For this was what He has just said, “As the Father hath loved me, so have I loved you;” and then to these He added the words, “Continue ye in my love;” in that, doubtless, wherewith I have loved you. Accordingly, when He says also of the Father, “I abide in His love,” we are to understand it of that love which was borne Him by the Father. But then, in this case also, is that love which the Father bears to the Son referable to the same grace as that wherewith we are loved of the Son: seeing that we on our part are sons, not by nature, but by grace; while the Only-begotten is so by nature and not by grace? Or is this even in the Son Himself to be referred to His condition as man? Certainly so. For in saying, “As the Father hath loved me, so have I loved you,” He pointed to the grace that was His as Mediator. For Christ Jesus is the Mediator between God and men, not in respect to His Godhead, but in respect to His manhood. And certainly it is in reference to this His human nature that we read, “And Jesus increased in wisdom and age, and in favor [grace] with God and men.” In harmony, therefore, with this, we may rightly say that while human nature belongs not to the nature of God, yet such human nature does by grace belong to the person of the only-begotten Son of God; and that by grace so great, that there is none greater, yea, none that even approaches equality. For there were no merits that preceded that assumption of humanity, but all His merits began with that very assumption. The Son, therefore, abideth in the love wherewith the Father hath loved Him, and so hath kept His commandments. For what are we to think of Him even as man, but that God is His lifter up? for the Word was God, the Only-begotten, co-eternal with Him that begat; but that He might be given to us as Mediator, by grace ineffable, the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us.
Sed quid illud est quod adjungit: Sicut et ego Patris mei praecepta servavi, et maneo in ejus dilectione? Utique etiam hic hanc dilectionem Patris intelligi voluit, qua eum diligit Pater. Ita quippe dixerat, Sicut dilexit me Pater, et ego dilexi vos; atque his verbis illa subjunxit, Manete in dilectione mea, illa procul dubio qua dilexi vos. Ergo quod ait etiam de Patre, Maneo in ejus dilectione, illa scilicet accipienda est qua dilexit eum Pater. Sed numquid et hic gratia intelligenda est, qua Pater diligit Filium, sicut gratia est qua nos diligit Filius: cum simus nos filii gratia, non natura; Unigenitus autem natura, non gratia? An hoc etiam in ipso Filio ad hominem referendum est? Ita sane. Nam dicendo, Sicut dilexit me Pater, et ego dilexi vos, gratiam mediatoris ostendit. Mediator autem Dei et hominum, non in quantum Deus, sed in quantum homo est Christus Jesus. Et profecto secundum id quod homo est, de illo legitur, Et Jesus proficiebat sapientia et aetate, et gratia apud Deum et homines . Secundum hoc igitur recte possumus dicere, quod cum ad naturam Dei non pertineat humana natura, ad personam tamen unigeniti Filii Dei per gratiam pertinet humana natura; et tantam gratiam, ut nulla sit major, nulla prorsus aequalis. Neque enim illam susceptionem hominis ulla merita praecesserunt, sed ab illa susceptione merita ejus cuncta coeperunt. Manet ergo Filius in dilectione qua eum dilexit Pater, et ideo servavit praecepta ejus. Quid est enim et ille homo, nisi quod Deus susceptor est ejus , Deus enim erat Verbum, Unigenitus gignenti coaeternus: sed ut mediator daretur nobis, per ineffabilem gratiam Verbum caro factum est, et habitavit in nobis .