A Treatise on the Spirit and the Letter 54

St Augustine of Hippo (AD 354–430) · De spiritu et littera · PL 44, 201–246

54 Whether Faith Be in a Man’s Own Power PL 44, 235

Attend now to the point which we have laid down for discussion: whether faith is in our own power? We now speak of that faith which we employ when we believe anything, not that which we give when we make a promise; for this too is called faith. We use the word in one sense when we say, “He had no faith in me,” and in another sense when we say, “He did not keep faith with me.” The one phrase means, “He did not believe what I said;” the other, “He did not do what he promised.” According to the faith by which we believe, we are faithful to God; but according to that whereby a thing is brought to pass which is promised, God Himself even is faithful to us; for the apostle declares, “God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able.” Well, now, the former is the faith about which we inquire, Whether it be in our power? even the faith by which we believe God, or believe on God. For of this it is written, “Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.” And again, “To him that believeth on Him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.” Consider now whether anybody believes, if he be unwilling; or whether he believes not, if he shall have willed it. Such a position, indeed, is absurd (for what is believing but consenting to the truth of what is said? and this consent is certainly voluntary): faith, therefore, is in our own power. But, as the apostle says: “There is no power but comes from God,” what reason then is there why it may not be said to us even of this: “What hast thou which thou hast not received?”—for it is God who gave us even to believe. Nowhere, however, in Holy Scripture do we find such an assertion as, There is no volition but comes from God. And rightly is it not so written, because it is not true: otherwise God would be the author even of sins (which Heaven forbid!), if there were no volition except what comes from Him; inasmuch as an evil volition alone is already a sin, even if the effect be wanting,—in other words, if it has not ability. But when the evil volition receives ability to accomplish its intention, this proceeds from the judgment of God, with whom there is no unrighteousness. He indeed punishes after this manner; nor is His chastisement unjust because it is secret. The ungodly man, however, is not aware that he is being punished, except when he unwillingly discovers by an open penalty how much evil he has willingly committed. This is just what the apostle says of certain men: “God hath given them up to the evil desires of their own hearts, . . .to do those things that are not convenient.” Accordingly, the Lord also said to Pilate: “Thou couldest have no power at all against me, except it were given thee from above.” But still, when the ability is given, surely no necessity is imposed. Therefore, although David had received ability to kill Saul, he preferred sparing to striking him. Whence we understand that bad men receive ability for the condemnation of their depraved will, while good men receive ability for trying of their good will.

Attende jam illud quod excutiendum posuimus, utrum fides in potestate sit? De hac enim fide nunc loquimur, quam adhibemus cum aliquid credimus, non quam damus cum aliquid pollicemur; nam et ipsa dicitur fides. Sed aliter dicimus. Non mihi habuit fidem: aliter, Non mihi servavit fidem. Nam illud est, Non credidit quod dixi: illud, Non fecit quod dixit. Secundum hanc fidem qua credimus, fideles sumus Deo: secundum illam vero qua fit quod promittitur, etiam Deus ipse fidelis est nobis. Hoc enim dicit Apostolus: Fidelis Deus, qui non vos permittat tentari super id quod potestis . De illa itaque fide quaerimus, utrum in potestate sit, qua credimus Deo, vel credimus in Deum. Hinc enim scriptum est, Credidit Abraham Deo, et deputatum est illi ad justitiam; et, Credenti in eum qui justificat impium, deputatur fides ejus ad justitiam . Vide nunc utrum quisque credat, si noluerit; aut non credat, si voluerit. Quod si absurdum est (quid est enim credere, nisi consentire verum esse quod dicitur? consensio autem utique volentis est); profecto fides in potestate est. Sed, sicut Apostolus dicit, Non est potestas nisi a Deo . Quid igitur causae est cur non et de ista nobis dicatur, Quid enim habes quod non accepisti ? Nam et ut credamus, Deus dedit. Nusquam autem legimus in Scripturis sanctis, Non est voluntas nisi a Deo. Et recte non scriptum est, quia verum non est: alioquin etiam peccatorum, quod absit, auctor est Deus, si non est voluntas nisi ab illo: quoniam mala voluntas jam sola peccatum est, etiam si desit effectus, id est, si non habeat potestatem. Porro cum voluntas mala potestatem accipit implere quod intendit, ex judicio Dei venit, apud quem non est iniquitas . Punit enim etiam isto modo; nec ideo injuste, quia occulte. Caeterum iniquus puniri se ignorat, nisi cum manifesto supplicio senserit nolens, quantum mali sit quod perpetravit volens. Hoc est quod de quibusdam Apostolus ait: Tradidit illos Deus in concupiscentias cordis illorum, ut faciant quae non conveniunt . Hinc et Dominus Pilato: Non haberes in me, inquit, potestatem, nisi data esset tibi desuper . Sed cum potestas datur, non necessitas utique imponitur. Unde cum David Saülis occidendi potestatem accepisset, maluit parcere, quam ferire . Unde intelligimus malos accipere potestatem ad damnationem malae voluntatis suae, bonos autem ad probationem bonae voluntatis suae.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Save for later

Enter your email and we will send you a sign-in link. No password. What you save (articles, verses, chapters, documents) follows you to any device.