The Letters of St. Jerome 97

san Girolamo (345–420 d.C.) · Epistolae · PL 22, 327–1224

97.0 To Pammachius and Marcella PL 22, 790

With this letter Jerome sends to Pammachius and Marcella a translation of the paschal letter issued by Theophilus for the year 402 a.d. together with the Greek original. He takes the precaution of sending this latter because in the preceding year complaints have been made that his translation was not accurate. Written in 402 a.d.

97.1 To Pammachius and Marcella PL 22, 790

1. Once more with the return of spring I enrich you with the wares of the east and send the treasures of Alexandria to Rome: as it is written, “God shall come from the south and the Holy One from Mount Paran, even a thick shadow.” (Hence in the Song of Songs the joyous cry of the bride: “I sat down under his shadow with great delight and his fruit was sweet to my taste.”) Now truly is Isaiah’s prophecy fulfilled: “In that day shall there be an altar to the Lord in the land of Egypt.” “Where sin hath abounded, grace doth much more abound.” They who fostered the infant Christ now with glowing faith defend Him in His manhood; and they who once saved Him from the hands of Herod are ready to save Him again from this blasphemer and heretic. Demetrius expelled Origen from the city of Alexander; but he is now thanks to Theophilus outlawed from the whole world. Like him to whom Luke has dedicated the Acts of the Apostles this bishop derives his name from his love to God. Where now is the wriggling serpent? In what plight does the venomous viper find himself? His is

A human face with wolfish body joined.

Where now is that heresy which crawled hissing through the world and boasted that both the bishop Theophilus and I were partisans of its errors? Where now is the yelping of those shameless hounds who, to win over the simple minded, falsely proclaimed our adherence to their cause? Crushed by the authority and eloquence of Theophilus they are now like demon-spirits only able to mutter and that from out of the earth. For they know nothing of Him who, as He comes from above, speaks only of the things that are above.

Rursum Orientalibus vos locupleto mercibus, et Alexandrinas opes primo Romam vere transmitto. Deus ab Austro veniet, et sanctus de monte Pharan, umbra condensa : unde et sponsa laetatur in Cantico Canticorum, dicens: In umbra ejus concupivi et sedi; et fructus ejus dulcis in faucibus meis . Vere nunc completur Isaiae vaticinium praedicantis: In die illa erit altare Domini in medio terrae Aegypti . Ubi abundavit peccatum, superabundavit et gratia . Qui parvulum Christum foverant, adultum fidei calore defendunt, ut qui per illos effugerat Herodis manus, effugiat haereticum blasphemantem. Quem Demetrius Alexandri urbe pepulit, toto orbe fugat Theophilus, ad quem Lucas scripsit Actus Apostolorum, qui ex amore Dei nomen invenit. Ubi nunc est co luber tortuosus? ubi venenatissima vipera?

Prima hominis facies, utero commissa luporum.

. Ubi haeresis, quae sibilabat in mundo, et me et Papam Theophilum sui jactabat erroris, latratuque impudentissimorum canum ad inducendos simplices, nostrum mentiebatur assemsum? Oppressa est ejus auctoritate, et eloquentia: et in morem daemoniacorum spirituum de terra loquitur. Nescit enim cum qui, de sursum veniens, ea loquitur quae sursum sunt.

97.2 PL 22, 791

2. Would that this generation of vipers would either honestly accept our doctrines, or else consistently defend its own; that we might know whom we are to esteem and whom we are to shun. As it is they have invented a new kind of penitence, hating us as enemies though they dare not deny our faith. What, I ask, is this chagrin of theirs which neither time nor reason seems able to cure? When swords flash in battle and men fall and blood flows in streams, hostile hands are often clasped in amity and the fury of war is exchanged for an unexpected peace. The partisans of this heresy alone can make no terms with churchmen; for they repudiate mentally the verbal assent that is extorted from them. When their open blasphemy is made plain to the public ear, and when they perceive their hearers clamouring against them; then they assume an air of simplicity, declaring that they hear such doctrines for the first time and that they have no previous knowledge of them as taught by their master. And when you hold their writings in your hand, they deny with their lips what their hands have written. Why, sirs, need you beset the Propontis, shift your abode, wander through different countries, and rend with foaming mouths a distinguished prelate of Christ and his followers? If your recantations are sincere, you should replace your former zeal for error with an equal zeal for the faith. Why do you patch together from this quarter and from that these rags of cursing? And why do you rail at the lives of men whose faith you cannot resist? Do you cease to be heretics because according to you sundry persons believe us to be sinners? And does impiety cease to disfigure your lips because you can point to scars on our ears? So long as you have a leopard’s spots and an Ethiopian’s skin, how can it help your perfidy to know that I too am marked by moles? See, Pope Theophilus is freely allowed to prove Origen a heretic; and the disciples do not defend the master’s words. They merely pretend that they have been altered by heretics and tampered with, like the works of many other writers. Thus they seek to maintain his cause not by their own belief but by other people’s errors. So much I would say against heretics who in the fury of their unjust hostility to us betray the secret feelings of their minds and prove the incurable nature of the wound that rankles in their breasts.

Atque utinam serpentina generatio, aut simpliciter nostra fateatur, aut constanter defendat sua, ut scire valeamus qui nobis amandi sint, qui cavendi. Nunc autem novum poenitentiae genus: oderunt nos, quasi hostes, quorum fidem publice negare non audent. 582 Rogo, quis est iste dolor, qui nec tempore, nec ratione curatur? Inter micantes gladios, jacentia corpora, rivos sanguinis profluentes, junguntur saepe hostiles dextrae, et belli rabiem pax repentina commutat. Soli sunt hujus haereseos sectatores, qui cum Ecclesiasticis non valent foederari: quia quod sermone coguntur dicere, mente condemnant. Et si quando aperta blasphemia publicis auribus fuerit revelata, et viderint contra se audientium turbam circumfremere, tunc simulata simplicitate, dicunt audisse se primum, quae magistrum dicere ante nescierint. Cumque eorum scripta teneantur, voce negant, quod litteris confitentur. Quid necesse est obsidere Propontidem, mutare loca, diversas lustrare regiones, et clarissimum Pontificem Christi, ejusque discipulos rabido ore discerpere? Si vera loquimini, pristinum erroris ardorem, ardore fidei commutate. Quid maledictorum pannos hinc inde consuitis; et eorum carpitis vitam, quorum fidei resistere non valetis? Num idcirco non estis vos haeretici, si nos quidam assertione vestra [al. nostra ] crediderint peccatores: et os impietate foedum non habebitis, si cicatricem poteritis in nostra aure monstrare? Quid juvat vestram perfidiam, vel prodest pellis Aethiopica et pardi varietas, si in nostro corpore naevus apparuerit? En Papa Theophilus tota Origenem arguit libertate, haereticum esse: nec illi dicta defendunt, sed fingunt ab haereticis immutata, multorumque dicunt libros similiter depravatos; ut illum non sua fide, sed aliorum tueantur erroribus. Verum haec adversum haereticos dicta sint, qui injusto contra nos odio saevientes, mentis [al. mente ] fatentur arcanum, et venena pectoris irremediabili dolore testantur.

97.3 PL 22, 791

3. But you are Christians and the lights of the senate: accept therefore from me the letter which I append. This year I send it both in Greek and Latin that the heretics may not again lyingly assert that I have made many changes in and additions to the original. I have laboured hard, I must confess, to preserve the charm of the diction by a like elegance in my version: and keeping within fixed lines and never allowing myself to deviate from these I have done my best to maintain the smooth flow of the writer’s eloquence and to render his remarks in the tone in which they are made. Whether I have succeeded in these two objects or not I must leave to your judgement to determine. As for the letter itself you are to know that it is divided into four parts. In the first Theophilus exhorts believers to celebrate the Lord’s passover; in the second he slays Apollinarius; in the third he demolishes Origen; while in the fourth and last he exhorts the heretics to penitence. If the polemic against Origen should seem to you to be inadequate, you are to remember that Origenism was fully treated in last year’s letter; and that this which I have just translated, as it aims at brevity, was not bound to dwell farther upon the subject. Besides, its terse and clear confession of faith directed against Apollinarius is not lacking in dialectical subtlety. Theophilus first wrests the dagger from his opponent’s hand, and then stabs him to the heart.

Vos Christiani Senatus lumina, accipite et Graecam et Latinam etiam hoc anno Epistolam, ne rursum haeretici mentiantur a nobis pleraque vel addita, vel mutata: in qua laborasse me fateor, ut verborum elegantiam pari interpretationis venustate servarem; et intra definitas lineas currens, 583 nec in quoquam excedens loco, eloquentiae ejus fluenta non perderem, easdemque res eodem sermone transferrem. Quod utrum consecutus sim necne, vestro judicio relinquo. Quam sciatis in quatuor partes esse divisam. In primo credentes hortatur ad Dominicum Pascha celebrandum: in secundo et tertio loco Apollinarium et Origenem jugulat: in quarto, id est, extremo, haereticos ad poenitentiam cohortatur. Si quid autem hic minus adversus Origenem dictum est, et in praeteriti anni Epistola continetur, et haec quam modo vertimus, brevitati studens, dicere plura non debuit. Porro contra Apollinarium succincta fides et pura professio non caret subtilitate dialectica, quae adversarium suum, extorto de manibus ejus pugione, confodit.

97.4 PL 22, 792

4. Entreat the Lord, therefore, that a composition which has won favour in Greek may not fail to win it also in Latin, and that what the whole East admires and praises Rome may gladly take to her heart. And may the chair of the apostle Peter by its preaching confirm the preaching of the chair of the evangelist Mark. Popular rumour, indeed, has it that the blessed pope Anastasius is of like zeal and spirit with Theophilus and that he has pursued the heretics even to the dens in which they lurk. Moreover his own letters inform us that he condemns in the West what is already condemned in the East. May he live for many years so that the reviving sprouts of heresy may in course of time by his efforts be made to wither and to die.

Orate igitur Dominum, ut quod in Graeco placet, in Latino non displiceat, et quod totus Oriens miratur et praedicat, laeto sinu Roma suscipiat. Praedicationem quoque cathedrae Marci Evangelistae cathedra Petri Apostoli sua praedicatione confirmet. Quanquam celebri sermone vulgatum sit, beatum quoque Papam Anastasium, eodem fervore, quia eodem spiritu est, latitantes in foveis suis haereticos persecutum, ejusque litterae doceant, damnatum in Occidente quod in Oriente damnatum est. Cui multos imprecamur annos, ut haereseos rediviva plantaria, per illius studium longo tempore arefacta, moriantur.

Philip Schaff and Henry Wace (eds.), New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1890-1900. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Salva per dopo

Inserisci la tua email: ti invieremo un link per accedere. Nessuna password. Ciò che salvi (voci, versetti, capitoli, documenti) ti segue su ogni dispositivo.