Sermons on Selected Lessons of the New Testament 94

sant'Agostino d'Ippona (354–430 d.C.) · Sermones de Scripturis · PL 38, 332–799

94.0 On the same words of the Gospel, John xvi. 8, ‘He will convict the world in respect of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgement.’ PL 38, 787

[CXLIV. Ben.]

On the same words of the Gospel, John xvi. 8, “He will convict the world in respect of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgement.”

94.1 On the same words of the Gospel, John xvi. 8, ‘He will convict the world in respect of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgement.’ PL 38, 787

1. When our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ was speaking at length of the coming of the Holy Ghost, He said among the rest, “He shall convince the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment.” Nor when He had said this, did He pass on to another subject; but vouchsafed to convey a somewhat more explicit notice of this same truth. “Of sin,” said He, “because they believed not on Me. Of righteousness, because I go to the Father. Of judgment, because the prince of this world hath been judged already.” There arises therefore within us a desire of understanding, why as if it were men’s only sin, not to believe on Christ, He said it of this alone, that the Holy Ghost should convince the world; but if it is plain that besides this unbelief there are manifold other sins of men, why of this alone should the Holy Ghost convince the world? Is it because all sins are by unbelief retained, by faith remitted; that therefore God imputeth this one above all the rest, by which it comes to pass that the rest are not loosed, so long as proud man believes not in an Humbled God? For so it is written; “God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble.” Now this grace of God is a gift of God. But the greatest gift is the Holy Ghost Himself; and therefore is it called grace. For forasmuch “as all had sinned, and needed the glory of God; because by one man sin entered into the world, and death by his sin in whom all have sinned;” therefore is it grace because given gratuitously. And therefore is it given gratuitously, because it is not rendered as a reward after a strict scrutiny of deserts, but given as a gift after the pardon of sins.

Peccatum incredulitatis cur solum arguitur. Spiritus sanctus, gratia Dei dicitur. Cum Dominus et Salvator noster Jesus Christus de adventu Spiritus sancti, quem se missurum esse promisit et misit, multa diceret; ait inter caetera: Ipse arguet mundum de peccato, et de justitia, et de judicio. Neque hoc cum dixisset, sermonem trajecit in aliud: sed ipsa aliquanto expressius insinuare dignatus est. De peccato quidem, inquit, quia non crediderunt in me: de justitia autem, quia ad Patrem vado: de judicio vero, quia princeps hujus mundi jam judicatus est. Oboritur ergo nobis intelligendi desiderium, cur peccatum hominum quasi solum esset, non credere in Christum, ita de hoc solo dixit, quod mundum Spiritus sanctus argueret: si autem manifestum est praeter hanc infidelitatem alia multa hominum esse peccata, cur de hoc solo mundum Spiritus sanctus arguat. An quia peccata omnia per infidelitatem tenentur, per fidem dimittuntur; propterea hoc unum prae caeteris imputat Deus, per quod fit ut caetera non solvantur, dum non credit in humilem Deum homo superbus? Sic enim scriptum est: Deus superbis resistit, humilibus autem dat gratiam . Gratia quippe Dei, donum Dei est. Donum autem maximum ipse Spiritus sanctus est; et ideo gratia dicitur. Cum enim omnes peccassent, et egerent gloria Dei ; quia per unum hominem peccatum intravit in mundum, et per peccatum mors, in quo omnes peccaverunt : ideo gratia, quia gratis datur. Ideo gratis datur, quia non quasi merces redditur post discussionem meritorum, sed donum datur post veniam delictorum.

94.2 PL 38, 788

2. Therefore of sin are unbelievers, that is, the lovers of the world, convinced; for they are signified by the name of the world. For when it is said, “He will convince the world of sin;” it is of none other sin than that they have not believed on Christ. For if this sin exist not, no sins will remain, because when the just man lives by faith, all are loosed. Now the difference is great as to whether one believe that Jesus is Christ, or whether he believe on Christ. For that Jesus is Christ even the devils believed, and yet the devils believed not on Christ. For he believeth on Christ, who both hopeth in Christ and loveth Christ. For if he have faith without hope and love, he believeth that Christ is, but he doth not believe on Christ. Whoso then believeth on Christ, by believing on Christ, Christ cometh unto him, and in a manner uniteth Himself to him, and he is made a member in His Body. Which cannot be, but by the accession of hope and love.

Credere Christum, et credere in Christum, differunt. De peccato igitur arguuntur infideles, id est, dilectores mundi: nam ipsi significantur mundi nomine. Cum enim dicitur, Arguet mundum de peccato; non alio quam quod non crediderunt in Christum. Hoc denique peccatum si non sit, nulla peccata remanebunt, quia justo ex fide vivente cuncta solvuntur. Sed multum interest, utrum quisque credat ipsum Christum, et utrum credat in Christum. Nam ipsum esse Christum et daemones crediderunt, nec tamen in Christum daemones crediderunt. Ille enim credit in Christum, qui et sperat in Christum et diligit Christum. Nam si fidem habet sine spe ac sine dilectione, Christum esse credit, non in Christum credit. Qui ergo in Christum credit, credendo in Christum, venit in eum Christus, et quodam modo unitur in eum, et membrum in corpore ejus efficitur. Quod fieri non potest, nisi et spes accedat et charitas.

94.3 PL 38, 788

3. What mean again His words, “Of righteousness, because I go to the Father”? And first must we enquire, if the world is convinced of sin, why it is also of righteousness? For who can rightly be convinced of righteousness? Is it indeed that the world is convinced of its own sin, but of Christ’s righteousness? I do not see what else can be understood; since He saith, “Of sin, because they believed not on Me. Of righteousness, because I go to the Father.” They believed not, He goeth to the Father. Their sin therefore, and His righteousness. But why would He name righteousness in this only, that He goeth to the Father? Is it not righteousness also that He came hither from the Father? Or is that rather mercy, that He came from the Father to us, and righteousness, that He goeth to the Father?

Justitia de qua arguitur mundus. Quid sibi etiam vult quod ait, De justitia, quia ad Patrem vado? Et primo quaerendum est, si de peccato mundus arguitur, cur et de justitia. Quid enim de justitia recte argui possit? An de peccato quidem suo, de justitia vero Christi mundus arguitur? Non video quid aliud possit intelligi: quandoquidem, De peccato, inquit, quia non crediderunt in me; de justitia vero, quia ad Patrem vado. Illi non crediderunt, ipse ad Patrem vadit. Illorum ergo peccatum, ipsius autem justitia. Sed cur in eo solo voluit nominare justitiam, quia vadit ad Patrem? Num non justitia est etiam quod huc venit a Patre? An illa potius misericordia est quod a Patre ad nos venit, justitia vero quod ad Patrem vadit?

94.4 PL 38, 789

4. So, Brethren, I think it expedient, that in so profound a depth of Scripture, in words, wherein peradventure there lies some hidden truth which may in due season be laid open, we should as it were together enquire faithfully, that we may attain to find healthfully. Why then doth He call this righteousness, in that He goeth to the Father, and not also in that He came from the Father? Is it that in that it is mercy that He came, therefore it is righteousness that He goeth? that so in our own case too we may learn that righteousness cannot be fulfilled in us, if we are slow to give a place first to mercy, “not seeking our own things, but the things of others also.” Which advice when the Apostle had given, he immediately joined to it the example of our Lord Himself; “Doing nothing,” saith he, “through strife or vain glory; but in lowliness of mind, each esteeming the other better than themselves. Not looking every man on his own things, but also on the things of others.” Then he added immediately, “Let this mind be in each of you which was also in Christ Jesus, who, being in the Form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God; but emptied Himself, taking the form of a servant, being made in the likeness of men, and found in fashion as a man; He humbled Himself, having become obedient even unto death, yea the death of the cross.” This is the mercy whereby He came from the Father. What then is the righteousness whereby He goeth to the Father? He goes on and says; “Wherefore God also hath exalted Him, and given Him a Name which is above every name; that at the Name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth, and that every tongue should confess that the Lord Jesus Christ is in the Glory of God the Father.” This is the righteousness whereby He goeth to the Father.

Justitia quod Christus vadit ad Patrem, quare. Ita, fratres, expedire arbitror, ut in tanta profunditate Scripturarum, in quibus forte verbis absconditum aliquid latet quod opportune aperiendum sit, tanquam simul fideliter inquiramus, ut salubriter invenire mereamur. Cur ergo hanc appellat justitiam quia vadit ad Patrem, et non etiam quia venit a Patre? An quia misericordia est quod venit, ideo justitia est quod vadit: ut et in nobis discamus impleri non posse justitiam, si pigri fuerimus praerogare misericordiam, non quae nostra sunt quaerentes, sed et quae aliorum? Quod cum monuisset Apostolus, continuo de ipso Domino conjunxit exemplum: Nihil, inquit, per contentionem, neque per inanem gloriam; sed in humilitate mentis alter alterum existimantes superiorem sibi; non quae sua sunt unusquisque intendentes, sed et quae aliorum. Deinde statim addidit: Singuli quique hoc sentite in vobis, quod et in Christo Jesu: qui cum in forma Dei esset, non rapinam arbitratus est esse aequalis Deo; sed semetipsum exinanivit, formam servi accipiens, in similitudinem hominum factus, et habitu inventus ut homo: humiliavit se, factus obediens usque ad mortem, mortem autem crucis. Haec est misericordia, qua venit a Patre. Quae igitur justitia est, qua vadit ad Patrem? Sequitur et dicit: Propter quod et Deus eum exaltavit, et donavit illi nomen quod est super omne nomen, ut in nomine Jesu omne genu flectatur, coelestium, terrestrium et infernorum, et omnis lingua confiteatur quia Dominus Jesus Christus in gloria est Dei Patris . Haec est justitia, qua vadit ad Patrem.

94.5 PL 38, 789

5. But if He Alone goeth to the Father, what doth it profit us? Why is the world convinced by the Holy Ghost of this righteousness? And yet if He did not Alone go to the Father, He would not say in another place, “No man hath ascended up to heaven, but He That descended from heaven, the Son of man who is in heaven.” But the Apostle Paul also says, “For our conversation is in heaven.” And why is this? Because he also says, “If ye be risen with Christ, seek the things which are above, where Christ sitteth on the right hand of God. Mind the things which are above, not those which are upon the earth. For ye are dead, and your life is hid with Christ in God.” How then is He Alone? Is He therefore Alone because Christ with all His members is One, as the Head with His Body? Now what is His Body, but the Church? As the same teacher says, “Now ye are the Body of Christ, and members in particular.” Forasmuch then as we have fallen, and He descended for our sakes, what is, “No man hath ascended, but He That descended;” but that no man hath ascended, except as made one with Him, and as a member fastened into His Body who descended? And thus He saith to His disciples, “Without Me ye can do nothing.” For in one way is He One with the Father, and in another one with us. He is One with the Father, in that the Substance of the Father and the Son is One; He is One with the Father, in that, “Being in the Form of God, He thought it not robbery to be equal with God.” But He was made One with us, in that “He emptied Himself, taking the form of a servant;” He was made one with us, according to the seed of Abraham, “in whom all nations shall be blessed.” Which place when the Apostle had brought forward, he said, “He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy Seed, which is Christ.” And for that we too belong to that which is Christ, by our incorporation together, and coherence to That Head, It is One Christ. And also for that he says to us too, “Therefore are ye Abraham’s seed, heirs according to the promise.” For if the seed of Abraham be One, and That One Seed of Abraham can only be understood of Christ; but this seed of Abraham we also are; therefore This Whole, that is, the Head and the Body, is One Christ.

Solus Christus ascendit in coelum. Unus Christus ex capite et membris. Christus aliter est unum cum Patre, aliter unum nobiscum. Sed si solus vadit ad Patrem, quid nobis prodest? Utquid ab Spiritu sancto de hac justitia mundus arguitur? Et tamen nisi solus iret ad Patrem, non alio loco diceret: Nemo ascendit in coelum, nisi qui descendit de coelo, Filius hominis qui est in coelo . Sed etiam Paulus apostolus dicit: Nostra enim conversatio in coelis est . Sed quare hoc? Quia item dicit: Si resurrexistis cum Christo, quae sursum sunt quaerite, ubi Christus est in dextera Dei sedens; quae sursum sunt sapite, non quae super terram. Mortui enim estis, et vita vestra abscondita est cum Christo in Deo . Quomodo ergo ille solus? An ideo solus, quia Christus unus est cum omnibus membris suis, tanquam caput cum corpore suo? Quae autem corpus ejus, nisi Ecclesia? Sicut dicit idem doctor: Vos autem estis corpus Christi, et membra ex parte . Cum ergo nos ceciderimus, et propter nos ipse descenderit, quid est, Nemo ascendit, nisi qui descendit; nisi quia nemo ascendit, nisi unum cum eo factus, et tanquam membrum compactus in ejus corpore qui descendit? Sic et discipulis dicit: Quia sine me nihil potestis facere . Aliter est enim unum cum Patre, et aliter unum nobiscum. Unum cum Patre est, quia una substantia est Patris et Filii: unum cum Patre est, quia cum in forma Dei esset, non rapinam arbitratus est esse aequalis Deo. Unus autem nobiscum factus est, quia semetipsum exinanivit, formam servi accipiens: unus nobiscum factus est, secundum semen Abrahae, in quo benedicentur omnes gentes. Quod cum commemorasset, ait Apostolus: Non dicit, Et seminibus, tanquam in multis; sed tanquam in uno, Et semini tuo, quod est Christus. Et quia et nos ad id pertinemus quod est Christus, nobis simul incorporatis et illi capiti cohaerentibus, unus est Christus: et quia et nobis dicit, Ergo Abrahae semen estis, secundum promissionem haeredes . Si enim unum est semen Abrahae, et illud unum semen Abrahae non intelligitur nisi Christus; hoc autem semen Abrahae etiam nos sumus: hoc ergo totum, id est, caput et corpus, unus est Christus.

94.6 PL 38, 790

6. And therefore we ought not to deem ourselves separated from that righteousness, which the Lord Himself makes mention of, saying, “Of righteousness, because I go to the Father.” For we too have risen with Christ, and we are with Christ our Head, now for a while by faith and hope; but our hope will be completed in the last resurrection of the dead. But when our hope shall be completed, then shall our justification be completed also. And the Lord who was to complete it showed us in His Own Flesh (that is, in our Head), Wherein He rose again and ascended to the Father, what we ought to hope for. For that thus it is written, “He was delivered for our sins, and rose again for our justification.” The world then is convinced “of sin” in those who believe not on Christ; “and of righteousness,” in those who rise again in the members of Christ. Whence it is said, “That we may be the righteousness of God in him.” For if not in Him, in no way righteousness. But if in Him, He goeth with us Whole to the Father, and this perfect righteousness will be fulfilled in us. And therefore “of judgment” too is the world convinced, “because the prince of this world hath been judged already;” that is, the devil, the prince of the unrighteous, who in heart inhabit only in this world which they love, and therefore are called “the world;” as our conversation is in heaven, if we have risen again with Christ. Therefore as Christ together with us, that is His Body, is One; so the devil with all the ungodly whose head he is, with as it were his own body, is one. Wherefore as we are not separated from the righteousness, of which the Lord said, “Because I go to the Father;” so the ungodly are not separated from that judgment, of which He said, “Because the prince of this world hath been judged already.”

Justitia Christi quomodo nostra. Et ideo nos non debemus ab illa justitia separatos putare, quam Dominus ipse commemorat, dicens: De justitia, quia ad Patrem vado. Cum Christo enim et nos resurreximus, et nos cum capite nostro Christo sumus, interim fide et spe: complebitur autem spes nostra in ultima resurrectione mortuorum. Cum autem complebitur spes nostra, tunc complebitur etiam justificatio nostra. Quam completurus Dominus, quid sperare debeamus, ostendit in carne sua (hoc est, in capite nostro), in qua resurrexit et ascendit ad Patrem. Quia sic scriptum est: Traditus est propter delicta nostra, et resurrexit propter justificationem nostram . Arguitur ergo mundus de peccato, in eis qui non credunt in Christum: et de justitia, in eis qui resurgunt in membris Christi. Unde dictum est: Ut nos simus justitia Dei in ipso . Si enim non in ipso, nullo modo justitia. Si autem in ipso, totus nobiscum vadit ad Patrem, et haec implebitur in nobis perfecta justitia. Propter hoc et de judicio mundus arguitur, quia princeps hujus mundi jam judicatus est: id est, diabolus princeps iniquorum, qui corde non habitant nisi in hoc mundo, quem diligunt, et ideo mundus vocantur; sicut nostra conversatio in coelis est, si resurrexerimus cum Christo. Ergo quemadmodum nobiscum, id est, cum corpore suo unus est Christus: sic cum omnibus impiis quibus caput est, cum quodam corpore suo unus est diabolus. Quapropter sicut nos non separamur a justitia, de qua Dominus dixit, Quia ad Patrem vado: sic impii non separantur ab illo judicio, de quo dixit, Quia princeps hujus mundi jam judicatus est.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Salva per dopo

Inserisci la tua email: ti invieremo un link per accedere. Nessuna password. Ciò che salvi (voci, versetti, capitoli, documenti) ti segue su ogni dispositivo.