Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 77
77.1 Chapter XIV. 25–27 PL 35, 1833
1. In the preceding lesson of the holy Gospel, which is followed by the one that has just been read, the Lord Jesus had said that He and the Father would come to those who loved Them, and make Their abode with them. But He had also already said above of the Holy Spirit, “But ye shall know Him; for He shall dwell with you, and shall be in you” (ver. 17): by which we understood that the divine Trinity dwelleth together in the saints as in His own temple. But now He saith, “These things have I spoken unto you while [still] dwelling with you.” That dwelling, therefore, which He promised in the future, is of one kind; and this, which He declares to be present, is of another. The one is spiritual, and is realized inwardly by the mind; the other is corporal, and is exhibited outwardly to the eye and the ear. The one brings eternal blessedness to those who have been delivered, the other pays its visits in time to those who await deliverance. As regards the one, the Lord never withdraws from those who love Him; as regards the other, He comes and goes. “These things, He says, “have I spoken unto you, while [still] dwelling with you;” that is, in His bodily presence, wherein He was visibly conversing with them.
In praecedenti lectione sancti Evangelii, quam sequitur ista quae modo recitata est, Dominus Jesus dixerat se et Patrem ad dilectores suos esse venturos, et apud eos mansionem esse facturos. Jamvero et superius dixerat de Spiritu sancto, Vos autem cognoscetis eum, quia apud vos manebit, et in vobis erit : unde intelleximus in sanctis tanquam in templo suo simul manere Trinitatem Deum. Nunc autem dicit: Haec locutus sum vobis apud vos manens. Illa itaque mansio alia est, quam promisit futuram; haec vero alia, quam praesentem esse testatur. Illa spiritualis est, atque intrinsecus mentibus redditur: haec corporalis forinsecus oculis atque auribus exhibetur. Illa in aeternum beatificat liberatos; haec in tempore visitat liberandos. Secundum illam Dominus a suis dilectoribus non recedit; secundum hanc it et recedit. Haec, inquit, locutus sum vobis, apud vos manens: utique praesentia corporali, qua cum illis visibilis loquebatur.
77.2 PL 35, 1833
2. “But the Comfort,” He adds, “[which is] the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, He shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.” Is it, then, that the Son speaks, and the Holy Spirit teaches, so that we merely get hold of the words that are uttered by the Son, and then understand them by the teaching of the Spirit as if the Son could speak without the Holy Spirit, or the Holy Spirit teach without the Son: or is it not rather that the Son also teacheth and the Spirit speaketh, and, when it is God that speaketh and teacheth anything, that the Trinity itself is speaking and teaching? And just because it is a Trinity, its persons required to be introduced individually, so that we might hear it in its distinct personality, and understand its inseparable nature. Listen to the Father speaking in the passage where thou readest, “The Lord said unto me, Thou art my Son:” listen to Him also teaching, in that where thou readest, “Every man that hath heard, and hath learned of the Father, cometh unto me.” The Son, on the other hand, thou hast just heard speaking; for He saith of Himself, “Whatsoever I have said unto you:” and if thou wouldst also know Him as a Teacher, bethink thyself of the Master, when He saith, “One is your Master, even Christ.” Furthermore, of the Holy Spirit, whom thou hast just been told of as a Teacher in the words, “He shall teach you all things,” listen to Him also speaking, where thou readest in the Acts of the Apostles, that the Holy Spirit said to the blessed Peter, “Go with them, for I have sent them.” The whole Trinity, therefore, both speaketh and teacheth: but were it not also brought before us in its individual personality, it would certainly altogether surpass the power of human weakness to comprehend it. For as it is altogether inseparable in itself, it could never be known as the Trinity, were it always spoken of inseparably; for when we speak of the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit, we certainly do not pronounce them simultaneously, and yet in themselves they cannot be else than simultaneous. But when He added, “He will bring to your remembrance,” we ought also to understand that we are commanded not to forget that these pre-eminently salutary admonitions are part of that grace which the Holy Spirit brings to our remembrance.
Paracletus autem, inquit, Spiritus sanctus, quem mittet Pater in nomine meo, ille vos docebit omnia, et commemorabit vos omnia quaecumque dixero vobis. Numquidnam dicit Filius, et docet Spiritus sanctus, ut dicente Filio verba capiamus, docente autem Spiritu sancto eadem verba intelligamus? Quasi dicat Filius sine Spiritu sancto, aut Spiritus sanctus doceat sine Filio: aut vero non et Filius doceat et Spiritus sanctus dicat, et cum Deus aliquid dicit et docet, Trinitas ipsa dicat et doceat? Sed quoniam Trinitas est, oportebat ejus singulas insinuare personas, eamque nos distincte audire, inseparabiliter intelligere. Audi Patrem dicentem ubi legis, Dominus dixit ad me, Filius meus es tu : audi et docentem ubi legis, Omnis qui audivit a Patre et didicit, venit ad me . Filium vero dicentem modo audisti; de se quippe ait, Quaecumque dixero vobis: quem si et docentem vis nosse, magistrum recole, Unus est, inquit, Magister vester Christus . Spiritum porro sanctum, quem modo audisti docentem ubi dictum est, Ipse vos docebit omnia, audi etiam dicentem, ubi legis in Actibus Apostolorum, beato Petro dixisse Spiritum sanctum, Vade cum illis, quia ego misi eos . Omnis igitur et dicit et docet Trinitas: sed nisi etiam singillatim commendaretur, eam nullo modo humana capere utique posset infirmitas. Cum ergo omnino sit inseparabilis, nunquam Trinitas esse sciretur, si semper inseparabiliter diceretur: nam et cum dicimus Patrem et Filium et Spiritum sanctum, non eos utique dicimus simul, cum ipsi non possint esse non simul. Quod vero addidit, commemorabit vos, intelligere debemus etiam, quod jubemur non oblivisci saluberrimos monitus ad gratiam pertinere, quam nos commemorat Spiritus.
77.3 PL 35, 1834
3. “Peace,” He said, “I leave with you, my peace I give unto you.” It is here we read in the prophet, “Peace upon peace:” peace He leaves with us when going away, His own peace He will give us when He cometh in the end. Peace He leaveth with us in this world, His own peace He will give us in the world to come. His own peace He leaveth with us, and abiding therein we conquer the enemy. His own peace He will give us when, with no more enemies to fight, we shall reign as kings. Peace He leaveth with us, that here also we may love one another: His own peace will He give us, where we shall be beyond the possibility of dissension. Peace He leaveth with us, that we may not judge one another of what is secret to each, while here on earth: His own peace will He give us, when He “will make manifest the counsels of the heart; and then shall every man have praise of God.” And yet in Him and from Him it is that we have peace, whether that which He leaveth with us when going to the Father, or that which He will give us when we ourselves are brought by Him to the Father. And what is it He leaveth with us, when ascending from us, save His own presence, which He never withdraweth? For He Himself is our peace who hath made both one. It is He, therefore, that becomes our peace, both when we believe that He is, and when we see Him as He is. For if, so long as we are in this corruptible body that burdens the soul, and are walking by faith, not by sight, He forsaketh not those who are sojourning at a distance from Himself; how much more, when we have attained to that sight, shall He fill us with Himself?
Pacem, inquit, relinquo vobis, pacem meam do vobis. Hoc est quod legimus apud prophetam, Pacem super pacem: pacem nobis relinquit iturus, pacem suam nobis dabit in fine venturus. Pacem nobis relinquit in hoc saeculo, pacem suam nobis dabit in futuro saeculo. Pacem suam nobis relinquit, in qua manentes hostem vincimus: pacem suam nobis dabit, quando sine hoste regnabimus. Pacem relinquit nobis, ut etiam hic invicem diligamus: pacem suam nobis dabit, ubi nunquam dissentire possimus. Pacem relinquit nobis, ne de occultis nostris invicem judicemus, cum in hoc sumus mundo: pacem suam dabit nobis, cum manifestabit cogitationes cordis, et tunc laus erit unicuique a Deo . In illo tamen atque ab illo nobis est pax, sive quam nobis relinquit iturus ad Patrem, sive quam nobis dabit nos perducturus ad Patrem. Quid autem nobis relinquit ascendens a nobis, nisi seipsum, dum non recedit a nobis? Ipse est enim pax nostra; qui fecit utraque unum . Pax ergo ipse nobis est, et cum credimus quia est, et cum videmus eum sicuti est . Si enim quamdiu sumus in corpore corruptibili quod aggravat animam, cum per fidem ambulamus, non per speciem, non deserit peregrinantes a se ; quanto magis cum ad ipsam speciem venerimus, nos implebit ex se?
77.4 PL 35, 1834
4. But why is it that, when He said, “Peace I leave with you,” He did not add, “my;” but when He said, “I give unto you,” He there made use of it? Is “my” to be understood even where it is not expressed, on the ground that what is expressed once may have a reference to both? Or may it not be that here also we have some underlying truth that has to be asked and sought for, and opened up to those who knock thereat? For what, if by His own peace He meant such to be understood as that which He possesses Himself? whereas the peace, which He leaves us in this world, may more properly be termed our peace than His. For He, who is altogether without sin, has no elements of discord in Himself; while the peace we possess, meanwhile, is such that in the midst of it we have still to be saying, “Forgive us our debts.” A certain kind of peace, accordingly, we do possess, inasmuch as we delight in the law of God after the inward man: but it is not a full peace, for we see another law in our members warring against the law of our mind. In the same way we have peace in our relations with one another, just because, in mutually loving, we have a mutual confidence in one another: but no more is such a peace as that complete, for we see not the thoughts of one another’s hearts; and we have severally better or worse opinions in certain respects of one another than is warranted by the reality. And so that peace, although left us by Him, is our peace: for were it not from Him, we should not be possessing it, such as it is; but such is not the peace He has Himself. And if we keep what we received to the end, then such as He has shall we have, when we shall have no elements of discord of our own, and we shall have no secrets hid from one another in our hearts. But I am not ignorant that these words of the Lord may be taken so as to seem only a repetition of the same idea, “Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you:” so that after saying “peace,” He only repeated it in saying “my peace;” and what He had meant in saying “I leave with you,” He simply repeated in saying “I give unto you.” Let each one understand it as he pleases; but it is my delight, as I believe it is yours also, my beloved brethren, to keep such hold of that peace here, where our hearts are making common cause against the adversary, that we may be ever longing for the peace which there will be no adversary to disturb.
Sed quid est quod ubi ait, Pacem relinquo vobis, non addidit meam; ubi vero ait, do vobis, ibi dixit meam? Utrum subaudiendum est meam, et ubi dictum non est, quia potest referri ad utrumque etiam quod semel dictum est? An forte et hic aliquid latet quod petendum est et quaerendum, et ad quod pulsantibus aperiendum? Quid si enim pacem suam eam voluit intelligi qualem habet ipse? Pax vero ista quam nobis relinquit in hoc saeculo, nostra est potius dicenda quam ipsius. Illi quippe nihil repugnat in seipso, qui nullum habet omnino peccatum: nos autem talem pacem nunc habemus, in qua adhuc dicamus, Dimitte nobis debita nostra . Est ergo nobis pax aliqua, quoniam condelectamur legi Dei secundum interiorem hominem: sed non est plena, quia videmus aliam legem in membris nostris, repugnantem legi mentis nostrae . Itemque inter nos ipsos est nobis pax, quia invicem nobis credimus quod invicem diligamus: sed nec ipsa plena est, quia cogitationes cordis nostri invicem non videmus; et quaedam de nobis quae non sunt in nobis, vel in melius invicem vel in deterius opinamur. Itaque ista etiamsi ab illo nobis relicta est, pax nostra est: nisi enim ab illo, non haberemus et talem; sed ipse non habet talem. Si tenuerimus usque in finem qualem accepimus, qualem habet habebimus, ubi nihil nobis repugnet ex nobis, et nihil nos invicem lateat in cordibus nostris. Nec ignoro ista Domini verba etiam sic accipi posse, ut ejusdem sententiae repetitio videatur, Pacem relinquo vobis, pacem meam do vobis: ut quod dixerat, pacem, hoc repetierit dicens, pacem meam; et quod dixerat, relinquo vobis, hoc repetierit dicens, do vobis. Ut volet quisque accipiat: me tamen delectat, credo et vos, ratres mei dilecti, sic tenere istam pacem, ubi adversarium concorditer vincimus, ut desideremus pacem, ubi adversarium non habebimus.
77.5 PL 35, 1835
5. But when the Lord proceeded to say, “Not as the world giveth, give I unto you,” what else does He mean but, Not as those give who love the world, give I unto you? For their aim in giving themselves peace is that, exempt from the annoyance of lawsuits and wars, they may find enjoyment, not in God, but in the friendship of the world; and although they give the righteous peace, in ceasing to persecute them, there can be no true peace where there is no real harmony, because their hearts are at variance. For as one is called a consort who unites his lot (sortem) with another, so may he be termed concordant whose heart has entered into a similar union. Let us, therefore, beloved, with whom Christ leaveth peace, and to whom He giveth His own peace, not after the world’s way, but in a way worthy of Him by whom the world was made, that we should be of one heart with Himself, having our hearts run into one, that this one heart, set on that which is above, may escape the corruption of the earth.
Quod vero Dominus adjunxit, atque ait, Non quomodo mundus dat, ego do vobis; quid est aliud, nisi, non quomodo homines dant qui diligunt mundum, ita do vobis? Qui propterea dant sibi pacem, ut sine molestia litium atque bellorum, non Deo, sed amico suo mundo perfruantur: et quando justis dant pacem ut non eos persequantur, pax non potest esse vera, ubi non est vera concordia; quia disjuncta sunt corda. Quomodo enim consors dicitur, qui sortem jungit; ita ille concors dicendus est, qui corda jungit. Nos ergo, charissimi, quibus Christus pacem relinquit, et pacem suam nobis dat, non sicut mundus, sed sicut ille per quem factus est mundus, ut concordes simus; jungamus invicem corda, et cor unum sursum habeamus, ne corrumpatur in terra.