Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 79

St Augustine of Hippo (AD 354–430) · In Joannis evangelium tractatus CXXIV · PL 35, 1379–1976

79 Chapter XIV. 29–31 PL 35, 1837

1. Our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ, had said unto His disciples, “If ye loved me, ye would surely rejoice, because I go unto the Father; for the Father is greater than I.” And that He so spake in His servant-form, and not in that of God, wherein He is equal with the Father, is well known to faith as it resides in the minds of the pious, not as it is feigned by the scornful and senseless. And then He added, “And now I have told you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye might believe.” What can He mean by this, when the fact rather is, that a man ought, before it comes to pass, to believe that which demands his belief? For it forms the very encomium of faith when that which is believed is not seen. For what greatness is there in believing what is seen, as in those words of the same Lord, when, in reproving a disciple, He said, “Because thou hast seen, thou hast believed; blessed are they that see not, and yet believe.” And I hardly know whether any one can be said to believe what he sees; for this same faith is thus defined in the epistle addressed to the Hebrews: “Now faith is the substance of those that hope, the assurance of things not seen.” Accordingly, if faith is in things that are believed, and that, too, in things which are not seen, what mean these words of the Lord, “And now I have told you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye might believe”? Ought He not rather to have said, And now I have told you before it come to pass, that ye may believe what, when it is come to pass, ye shall see? For even he who was told, “Because thou hast seen, thou hast believed,” did not believe only what he saw; but he saw one thing, and believed another: for he saw Him as man, and believed Him to be God. He perceived and touched the living flesh, which he had seen in the act of dying, and he believed in the Deity infolded in that flesh. And so he believed with the mind what he did not see, by the help of that which was apparent to his bodily senses. But though we may be said to believe what we see, just as every one says that he believes his own eyes, yet that is not to be mistaken for the faith which is built up by God in our souls; but from things that are seen, we are brought to believe in those which are invisible. Wherefore, beloved, in the passage before us, when our Lord says, “And now I have told you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye might believe;” by the words, “when it is come to pass,” He certainly means, that they would yet see Him after His death, alive, and ascending to His Father; at the sight of which they should then be compelled to believe that He was indeed the Christ, the Son of the living God, seeing He could do such a thing, even after predicting it, and also could predict it before He did it: and this they should then believe, not with a new, but with an augmented faith; or at least [with a faith] that had been impaired by His death, and was now repaired by His resurrection. For it was not that they had not previously also believed Him to be the Son of God, but when His own predictions were actually fulfilled in Him, that faith, which was still weak at the time of His here speaking to them, and at the time of His death almost ceased to exist, sprang up again into new life and increased vigor.

2. But what says He next? “Hereafter I will not talk much with you; for the prince of this world cometh;” and who is that, but the devil? “And hath nothing in me;” that is to say, no sin at all. For by such words He points to the devil, as the prince, not of His creatures, but of sinners, whom He here designates by the name of this world. And as often as the name of the world is used in a bad sense, He is pointing only to the lovers of such a world; of whom it is elsewhere recorded, “Whosoever will be a friend of this world, becomes the enemy of God.” Far be it from us, then, so to understand the devil as prince of the world, as if he wielded the government of the whole world, that is, of heaven and earth, and all that is in them; of which sort of world it was said, when we were lecturing on Christ the Word, “And the world was made by Him.” The whole world therefore, from the highest heavens to the lowest earth, is subject to the Creator, not to the deserter; to the Redeemer, not to the destroyer; to the Deliverer, not to the enslaver; to the Teacher, not to the deceiver. And in what sense the devil is to be understood as the prince of the world, is still more clearly unfolded by the Apostle Paul, who, after saying, “We wrestle not against flesh and blood,” that is, against men, went on to say, “but against principalities and powers, and the world-rulers of this darkness.” For in the very next word he has explained what he meant by “world,” when he added, “of this darkness;” so that no one, by the name of the world, should understand the whole creation, of which in no sense are fallen angels the rulers. “Of this darkness,” he says, that is, of the lovers of this world: of whom, nevertheless, there were some elected, not from any deserving of their own, but by the grace of God, to whom he says, “Ye were sometimes darkness; but now are ye light in the Lord.” For all have been under the rulers of this darkness, that is, [under the rulers] of wicked men, or darkness, as it were, in subjection to darkness: but “thanks be to God, who hath delivered us,” says the same apostle, “from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of the Son of His love.” And in Him the prince of this world, that is, of this darkness, had nothing; for neither did He come with sin as God, nor had His flesh any hereditary taint of sin in its procreation by the Virgin. And, as if it were said to Him, Why, then, dost Thou die, if Thou hast no sin to merit the punishment of death? He immediately added, “But that the world may know that I love the Father, and as the Father gave me commandment, even so I do: arise, let us go hence.” For He was sitting at table with those who were similarly occupied. But “let us go,” He said, and whither, but to the place where He, who had nothing in Him deserving of death, was to be delivered up to death? But He had the Father’s commandment to die, as the very One of whom it had been foretold, “Then I paid for that which I took not away;” and so appointed to pay death to the full, while owing it nothing, and to redeem us from the death that was our due. For Adam had seized on sin as a prey, when, deceived, he presumptuously stretched forth his hand to the tree, and attempted to invade the incommunicable name of that Godhead which was disallowed him, and with which the Son of God was endowed by nature, and not by robbery.

Dominus et salvator noster Jesus Christus dixerat discipulis suis: Si diligeretis me, gauderetis utique, quia vado ad Patrem; quia Pater major me est. Quod ex forma servi eum dixisse, non ex forma Dei in qua aequalis est Patri, novit fides quae religiosis est mentibus fixa, non calumniosis et dementibus ficta. Deinde subjunxit: Et nunc dixi vobis priusquam fiat, ut cum factum fuerit, credatis. Quid est hoc, cum magis homo credere debeat antequam fiat id quod credendum est? Haec est enim laus fidei, si quod creditur non videtur. Nam quid magnum est si creditur quod videtur, secundum illam ejusdem Domini sententiam, quando discipulum arguit dicens: Quia vidisti, credidisti, beati qui non vident et credunt ? Et nescio utrum credere dicendus est quisque quod videt; nam ipsa fides in Epistola quae scribitur ad Hebraeos, ita est definita: Est autem fides sperantium substantia, convictio rerum quae non videntur . Quapropter si fides est rerum quae creduntur, eademque fides earum est quae non videntur; quid sibi vult quod Dominus ait, Et nunc dixi vobis priusquam fiat, ut cum factum fuerit, credatis? Nonne potius dicendum fuit, Et nunc dixi vobis priusquam fiat, ut credatis, quod cum factum fuerit, videatis? Nam et ille cui dictum est, Quia vidisti, credidisti, non hoc credidit quod vidit; sed aliud vidit, aliud credidit: vidit enim hominem, credidit Deum. Cernebat quippe atque tangebat carnem viventem, quam viderat morientem; et credebat Deum in carne ipsa latentem. Credebat ergo mente quod non videbat, per hoc quod sensibus corporis apparebat. Sed etsi dicuntur credi quae videntur, sicut dicit unusquisque oculis suis se credidisse: non tamen ipsa est quae in nobis aedificatur fides; sed ex rebus quae videntur, agitur in nobis ut ea credantur quae non videntur. Quocirca, dilectissimi, unde nunc mihi sermo est, quod Dominus ait, Et nunc dixi vobis priusquam fiat, ut cum factum fuerit, credatis; illud utique dicit, cum factum fuerit, quod eum visuri erant post mortem viventem, et ad Patrem ascendentem: quo viso illud fuerant credituri, quod ipse esset Christus Filius Dei vivi, qui potuit hoc facere cum praedixisset, et praedicere ante quam faceret: credituri autem hoc non fide nova, sed aucta; aut certe cum mortuus esset defecta, cum resurrexisset refecta Neque enim eum Dei Filium non et ante credebant; sed cum in illo factum esset quod ante praedixit, fides illa quae tunc quando illis loquebatur fuit parva, et cum moreretur pene jam nulla, et revixit et crevit.

Deinde quid dicit? Jam non multa loquar vobiscum: venit enim princeps mundi hujus: quis, nisi diabolus? Et in me non habet quidquam: nullum scilicet omnino peccatum. Sic enim ostendit non creaturarum, sed peccatorum, principem diabolum, quos nunc nomine mundi hujus appellat. Et quotiescumque mundi nomen in mali significatione ponitur, non ostendit nisi mundi istius amatores; de quibus alibi scriptum est, Quicumque voluerit amicus esse saeculi hujus, inimicus Dei constituetur . Absit ergo ut sic intelligatur diabolus princeps mundi, tanquam gerat universi mundi, id est, coeli et terrae, atque omnium quae in eis sunt principatum: de quali mundo dictum est, cum de Christo Verbo sermo esset, Et mundus per eum factus est . Universus itaque mundus a summis coelis usque ad infimam terram creatori est subditus, non desertori; redemptori, non interemptori; liberatori, non captivatori; doctori, non deceptori. Quem admodum autem sit intelligendus princeps mundi diabolus, evidentius aperuit Paulus apostolus, qui cum dixisset, Non est nobis colluctatio adversus carnem et sanguinem, id est, adversus homines; subjecit, atque ait, sed adversus principes et potestates et rectores mundi tenebrarum harum . Sequenti enim verbo exposuit quid dixisset, mundi, cum subjecit, tenebrarum harum: ne quisquam mundi nomine intelligeret universam creaturam, cujus nullo modo sunt rectores angeli desertores. Tenebrarum, inquit, harum, id est, mundi istius amatorum: ex quibus tamen electi sunt, non per suum meritum, sed per Dei gratiam, quibus dicit, Fuistis enim aliquando tenebrae; nunc autem lux in Domino . Omnes enim fuerunt sub rectoribus tenebrarum harum, id est, hominum impiorum, tanquam tenebrae sub tenebris: sed gratias Deo, qui eruit nos, sicut dicit idem apostolus, de potestate tenebrarum, et transtulit in regnum Filii charitatis suae . In quo princeps hujus mundi, hoc est tenebrarum harum, non habebat quidquam; quia neque cum peccato Deus venerat, nec ejus carnem de peccati propagine Virgo pepererat. Et tanquam ei diceretur, Cur ergo moreris, si non habes peccatum cui debeatur mortis supplicium? continuo subjecit, Sed ut cognoscat mundus quia diligo Patrem, et sicut mandatum dedit mihi Pater, sic facio; surgite, eamus hinc. Discumbens enim discumbentibus loquebatur. Eamus autem dixit, quo, nisi ad illum locum unde fuerat tradendus ad mortem, qui nullum habebat meritum mortis? Sed habebat ut moreretur mandatum Patris, tanquam ille de quo praedictum erat, Quae non rapui, tunc exsolvebam : mortem sine debito soluturus, et nos a morte debita redempturus. Rapuerat autem Adam peccatum, quando manum in arborem praesumptione deceptus extendit, ut incommunicabile nomen inconcessae divinitatis invaderet, quam Filio Dei natura contulerat, non rapina.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Save for later

Enter your email and we will send you a sign-in link. No password. What you save (articles, verses, chapters, documents) follows you to any device.