Sermons on Selected Lessons of the New Testament 83
83.0 On the words of the Gospel of John vii. 6, etc., where Jesus said that He was not going up unto the feast, and notwithstanding went up PL 38, 737
[CXXXIII. Ben.]
On the words of the Gospel of John vii. 6, etc., where Jesus said that He was not going up unto the feast, and notwithstanding went up.
83.1 On the words of the Gospel of John vii. 6, etc., where Jesus said that He was not going up unto the feast, and notwithstanding went up PL 38, 737
1. I Purpose by the Lord’s assistance to treat of this section of the Gospel which has just been read; nor is there a little difficulty here, lest the truth be endangered, and falsehood glory. Not that either the truth can perish, nor falsehood triumph. Now hearken for a while what difficulty this lesson has; and being made attentive by the propounding of the difficulty, pray that I may be sufficient for its solution. “The Jews’ feast of tabernacles was at hand;” these it seems are the days which they observe even to this day, when they build huts. For this solemnity of theirs is called from the building of tabernacles; since σκηνὴ means a “tabernacle,” σκηνοπηγία is the building of a tabernacle. These days were kept as feast days among the Jews; and it was called one feast day, not because it was over in one day, but because it was kept up by a continued festivity; just as the feast day of the Passover, and the feast day of unleavened bread, and notwithstanding, as is manifest, that feast is kept throughout many days. This anniversary then was at hand in Judæa, the Lord Jesus was in Galilee, where He had also been brought up, where too He had relations and kinsfolk, whom Scripture calls “His brethren.” “His brethren, therefore,” as we have heard it read, “said unto Him, Pass from hence, and go into Judæa; that Thy disciples also may see Thy works that Thou doest. For no man doeth anything in secret, and himself seeketh to be known openly. If Thou do these things, manifest Thyself to the world.” Then the Evangelist subjoins, “For neither did His brethren believe in Him.” If then they did not believe in Him, the words they threw out were of envy. “Jesus answered them, My time is not yet come; but your time is alway ready. The world cannot hate you; but Me it hateth, because I testify of it that the works thereof are evil. Go ye up to this feast day. I go not up to this feast day, for My time is not yet accomplished.” Then follows the Evangelist; “When He had said these words, He Himself stayed in Galilee. But when His brethren were gone up, then went He also up to the feast day, not openly, but as it were in secret.” Thus far is the extent of the difficulty, all the rest is clear.
Evangelicae lectionis expositio. Propositum est nobis, in adjutorio Domini, de hoc recentissimo Evangelii capitulo disputare, nec est parva quaestio, ne periclitetur veritas, et falsitas glorietur. Sed neque veritas perire potest, neque falsitas superare. Quid autem quaestionis habeat ista lectio, parumper accipite; et facti intenti per propositam quaestionem, orate ut sufficiamus ad solutionem. Dies festus erat Judaeorum scenopegia: hi dies sunt, quantum videtur, quos hodieque observant, quando casas vocant. Est enim illis ista solemnitas de fabricatione tabernaculorum; quoniam tabernaculum σκηνή dicitur, scenopegia est tabernaculi fabricatio. Hi dies festi apud Judaeos agebantur: et appellabatur unus dies festus, non quia uno die fiebat, sed quia continuata festivitate peragebatur; sicut dies festus Paschae, sicut dies festus azymorum, et tamen, sicut manifestum est, ille festus dies agitur per aliquot dies. Erat ergo in Judaea ista solemnitas; Dominus Jesus in Galilaea erat, ubi et nutritus est, ubi et consanguineos atque cognatos habuit, quos Scriptura fratres appellat. Dixerunt ergo ei, sicut lectum audivimus, fratres ejus: Transi hinc, et vade in Judaeam, ut et discipuli tui videant opera tua quae facis. Nemo enim in occulto quid facit, et quaerit ipse in palam esse. Si haec facis, manifesta te mundo. Deinde subjungit Evangelista: Neque enim fratres ejus credebant in eum. Si ergo non in eum credebant, invidiosa verba subjiciebant. Respondit eis Jesus: Tempus meum nondum advenit; tempus autem vestrum semper est paratum. Non potest mundus odisse vos: me autem odit, quia ego testimonium perhibeo de illo, quia opera ejus mala sunt. Vos ascendite in diem festum hunc. Ego non ascendo ad diem festum istum, quia tempus meum nondum impletum est. Deinde sequitur Evangelista: Haec cum dixisset, ipse mansit in Galilaea. Ut autem ascenderunt fratres ejus, tunc et ipse ascendit ad diem festum, non manifeste, sed quasi occulte. Huc usque extenditur quaestio, caetera aperta sunt.
83.2 PL 38, 737
2. What then is the difficulty? what makes the perplexity? what is in peril? Lest the Lord, yea, to speak more plainly, lest the Truth Itself should be thought to have lied. For if we would have it thought that He lied, the weak will receive an authority for lying. We have heard say that He lied. For those who think that He lied, speak thus, “He said that He should not go up to the feast day, and He went up.” In the first place then, let us, as far as in the press of time we can, see whether he does lie, who says a thing and does it not. For example, I have told a friend, “I will see you to-morrow;” some greater necessity occurs to hinder me; I have not on that account spoken falsely. For when I made the promise, I meant what I said. But when some greater matter occurred, which hindered the accomplishment of my promise, I had no design to lie, but I was not able to fulfil the promise. Lo, to my thinking I have used no labour to persuade you, but have merely suggested to your good sense, that he who promises something, and doeth it not, does not lie, if, that he do it not, something has occurred to hinder the fulfilment of his promise, not to be any proof of falsehood.
Christum in eo loco non esse mentitum. Quid ergo quaeritur? quid movet? quid in periculo est? Ne Dominus, imo ut apertius dicamus, ne ipsa Veritas credatur esse mentita. Si enim volumus mentitum putari, mentiendi auctoritatem infirmus accipiet. Audivimus dicere mentitum esse. Qui enim putant esse mentitum, hoc dicunt: Dixit se non ascensurum ad diem festum, et ascendit. Primo ergo, quantum in angusto tempore possumus, videamus utrum mentiatur, qui dicit aliquid et non facit. Verbi enim causa, dixi amico, Cras te videbo: occurrit major necessitas, quae retineret; non ideo falsum dixi. Quando enim promisi, hoc sentiebam quod dicebam. Quando autem aliud majus occurrit, quod impedivit fidem promissionis meae, non mentiri volui, sed promissum implere non potui. Ecce, quantum arbitror, non laboravi, ut persuaderem, sed tantummodo admonui prudentiam vestram, non mentiri eum qui promittit aliquid et non facit, si ut non faciat, aliud occurrerit, quod ejus impediat promissionem, non quod convincat falsitatem.
83.3 PL 38, 738
3. But some one who hears me will say, “Canst thou then say this of Christ, that He either was not able to fulfil what He would, or that He did not know things to come?” Thou doest well, good is thy suggestion, right thy hint; but, O man, share with me my anxiety. Dare we to say that He lies, Who we do not dare to say is weak in power? I for my part, to the best of my thinking, as far as according to my infirmity I am able to judge, would choose that a man should be deceived in any matter rather than lie in any. For to be deceived is the portion of infirmity, to lie of iniquity. “Thou hatest, O Lord,” saith he, “all them that work iniquity.” And immediately after, “Thou shalt destroy all them that speak a lie.” Either “iniquity” and “a lie” are upon a level; or, “Thou shalt destroy,” is more than “Thou hatest.” For he who is held in hatred, is not immediately punished by destruction. But let that question be, whether there be ever a necessity to lie; for I am not now discussing that; it is a dark question, and has many lappings; I have not time to cut them, and to come to the quick. Therefore let the treatment of it be deferred to some other time; for peradventure it will be cured by the Divine assistance without any words of mine. But attend and distinguish between what I have deferred, and what I wish to treat of to-day. Whether on any occasion one may lie, this difficult and most obscure question I defer. But whether Christ lied, whether the Truth spake anything false, this, being reminded of it by the Gospel lesson, have I undertaken to-day.
Mentiri pejus est quam falli. Sed ait qui me audit: Numquid hoc potes de Christo dicere, quia vel non potuit implere quae volebat, vel futura nesciebat? Bene agis, bene suggeris, recte commones: sed, o homo, partire mecum sollicitudinem. Quem non audemus dicere minus valentem, audemus dicere mentientem? Ego quidem, quantum existimo, quantum pro mea infirmitate judicare possum, eligo ut homo in aliquo fallatur, quam ut in aliquo mentiatur. Falli enim pertinet ad infirmitatem, mentiri ad iniquitatem. Odisti, inquit, Domine, omnes qui operantur iniquitatem. Et continuo: Perdes omnes qui loquuntur mendacium . Aut tantumdem valet iniquitas et mendacium; aut plus est Perdes, quam Odisti. Neque enim qui odio habetur, continuo perditione punitur. Verum sit illa quaestio, utrum aliquando mentiri necesse sit: non enim modo discutio: latebrosa est, multos sinus habet; non vacat omnes secare, et ad vivum pervenire. Ergo ejus curatio in tempus aliud differatur; fortassis enim sine sermone nostro divina opitulatione sanabitur. Sed quid distuli, quid volo hodie tractare, intendite et distinguite. An aliquando mentiendum sit, hanc dixi difficilem et latebrosissimam quaestionem, hanc differo. Utrum autem Christus mentitus sit, utrum Veritas aliquid falsum dixerit, hoc hodie suscepimus admoniti ex evangelica lectione.
83.4 PL 38, 738
4. Now what the difference is between being deceived, and lying, I will briefly state. He is deceived who thinks what he says to be true, and therefore says it, because he thinks it true. Now if this which he that is deceived says, were true, he would not be deceived; if it were not only true, but he also knew it to be true, he would not lie. He is deceived then, in that it is false, and he thinks it true; but he only says it because he thinks it true. The error lies in human infirmity, not in the soundness of the conscience. But whosoever thinks it to be false, and asserts it as true, he lies. See, my Brethren, draw the distinction, ye who have been brought up in the Church, instructed in the Lord’s Scriptures, not uninformed, nor simple, nor ignorant men. For there are among you men learned and erudite, and not indifferently instructed in all kinds of literature; and with those of you who have not learnt that literature which is called liberal, it is more that ye have been nourished up in the word of God. If I labour in explaining what I mean, do ye aid me both by the attention of your hearing, and the thoughtfulness of your meditations. Nor will ye aid, unless ye are aided. Wherefore pray we mutually for one another, and look equally for our common Succour. He is deceived, who whereas what he says is false, thinks it to be true; but he lies, who thinks a thing to be false, and gives it out as true, whether it be true or false. Observe what I have added, “whether it be true or false;” yet he who thinks it to be false, and asserts it as true, lies; he aims to deceive. For what good is it to him, that it is true? He all the while thinks it false, and says it as if it were true. What he says is true in itself, it is in itself true; with regard to him it is false, his conscience does not hold that which he is saying; he thinks in himself one thing to be true, he gives out another for truth. His is a double heart, not single; he does not bring out that which he has in it. The double heart has long since been condemned. “With deceitful lips in a heart and a heart have they spoken evil things.” Had it been enough to say, “in the heart have they spoken evil things,” where is the “deceitful lips”? What is deceit? When one thing is done, another pretended. Deceitful lips are not a single heart; and because not a single heart, therefore “in a heart and a heart;” therefore “in a heart” twice, because the heart is double.
Falli et mentiri quomodo differant. Quid autem intersit inter falli et mentiri, breviter dico. Fallitur qui putat verum esse quod dicit, et quia verum putat, ideo dicit. Hoc autem quod dicit qui fallitur, si verum esset, non falleretur: si non solum verum esset, sed etiam verum esse sciret, non mentiretur. Fallitur ergo, quia falsum est, et verum putat; dicit autem nonnisi quia verum putat. Error est in humana infirmitate, sed non est in conscientiae sanitate. Quisquis autem falsum putat esse et pro vero asserit, ipse mentitur. Videte, fratres mei, distinguite nutriti in Ecclesia, eruditi in Scripturis dominicis, non rudes, non rustici, non idiotae. Sunt enim inter vos docti et eruditi viri et quibuscumque litteris non mediocriter instructi: et qui illas litteras quae liberales vocantur, non didicistis, plus est quod in sermone Dei nutriti estis. Si laboro in explicando quod sentio, adjuvate me et attentione audiendi et prudentia cogitandi. Nec adjuvabitis, nisi adjuvemini. Unde invicem pro nobis oremus, et commune adjutorium pariter exspectemus. Fallitur, qui cum sit falsum, verum putat esse quod dicit: mentitur autem, qui falsum esse aliquid putat, et pro vero dicit, sive illud verum sit, sive falsum. Intuemini quid addiderim. Sive illud verum sit, sive falsum, tamen qui falsum putat, et verum asserit, mentitur: fallere affectat. Quid enim ei prodest, quia verum est? Interim ipse hoc falsum putat, et dicit tanquam verum sit. Verum est in se illud quod dicit, in se verum est: apud illum falsum est, non hoc habet conscientia ejus quod loquitur; aliud in se cogitat verum esse, aliud foras profert pro veritate. Duplex cor est, non simplex: non quod ibi habet hoc profert. Duplex cor olim reprobatum. Labia dolosa in corde et corde locuti sunt mala . Sufficeret ut diceret, in corde locuti sunt mala; ubi est labia dolosa? Quid est dolus? Cum aliud agitur, aliud obtenditur. Labia dolosa non simplex cor; et quia non simplex cor, ideo in corde et corde; ideo bis corde, quia duplex cor.
83.5 PL 38, 739
5. How then think we of the Lord Jesus Christ, that He lied? If it is a less evil to be deceived than to lie, dare we to say that He lies who we dare not to say is deceived? But He is neither deceived, nor doth He lie; but in very deed as it is written (for of Him is it understood, of Him ought it to be understood), “Nothing false is said unto the King, and nothing false shall proceed out of His mouth.” If by King here he meant any man, let us prefer Christ the King, to a man-king. But if, which is the truer understanding of it, it is Christ of whom he spake, if I say, as is the truer understanding of it, it is Christ of whom he spake (for to Him indeed nothing false is said, in that He is not deceived; from His Mouth nothing false proceedeth, in that He doth not lie); let us look how we are to understand the section of the Gospel, and let us not make the pitfall of a lie, as it were, on heavenly authority. But it is most absurd to be seeking to explain the truth, and to prepare a place for a lie. What art thou teaching me, I ask thee, who art explaining this text to me, what wouldest thou teach me? I do not know whether you would dare to say, “Falsehood.” For if you should dare to say this, I turn away mine ears, and fasten them up with thorns, that if you should try to force your way, I might through their very pricking make away without the explanation of the Gospel. Tell me what thou wouldest wish to teach me, and thou hast resolved the difficulty. Tell me, I pray thee; lo, here I am; mine ears are open, my heart is ready, teach me. But I ask, what? I will not travel through many things. What art thou going to teach me? Whatsoever learning thou art about to bring forward, whatsoever strength to show in disputation, tell me this one thing only, one of two things I ask; art thou going to teach me truth or falsehood? What do we suppose he will answer lest one depart; lest while he is open-mouthed and making an effort to bring out his words, I forthwith leave him: what will he promise but truth? I am listening, standing, expecting, most earnestly expecting. See here, he who promised that he will teach me truth, insinuates falsehood concerning Christ. How then shall he teach truth, who would say that Christ is false? If Christ is false, can I hope that thou wilt tell me the truth?
Nec falli potest Christus, nec mentiri. Dominum ergo Jesum Christum quid existimamus, quia mentitus est? Si minus est falli, quam mentiri; quem dicere non audemus falli, dicere audemus mentiri? Ille vero nec fallitur, nec mentitur: sed omnino, sicut scriptum est (de illo quippe intelligitur, de illo debet intelligi), Nihil falsum dicitur regi, et nihil falsum exiet de ore ejus. Si regem quemlibet hominem dixit, regem Christum regi homini praeponamus. Si autem, quod verius intelligitur, Christus est de quo dixit (ei quippe falsum nihil dicitur, quia non fallitur; ex ejus ore nihil falsi procedit, quia non mentitur); quaeramus quomodo capitulum evangelicum intelligamus, et non voraginem mendacii quasi coelesti auctoritate construamus. Est autem absurdius quaerere exponere veritatem et locum praeparare mendacio. Quid me doces, rogo te, qui capitulum hoc exponis mihi? quid me vis docere? Nescio utrum audeas dicere, Falsitatem. Nam si ausus fueris hoc dicere, averto aures, et obturo spinis, ut si coarctare tentaveris, etiam punctus abscedam absque exposito Evangelio. Dic mihi quid me velis docere, et solvisti quaestionem. Dic, oro te: ecce adsum; aures patent, cor paratum est, doce. Sed quaero quid? Non eo per multa. Quid docturus es? Quamcumque doctrinam in medio versaturus, quidquid nervorum in disputatione adhibiturus, hoc solum dic, unum de duobus interrogo: Veritatem me docturus es, an falsitatem? Quid putamus cum responsurum, ne abscedat; ne hiantem et verba exprimere conantem continuo deseram? quid promissurus est, nisi veritatem? Audio, sto, exspecto, intentissime exspecto. Ecce ille qui promittebat se docturum me veritatem, de Christo insinuat falsitatem. Quomodo igitur veritatem docturus, Christum mendacem dicturus? Si Christus mentitur, sperandum est mihi quod tu mihi verum dicturus es?
83.6 PL 38, 740
6. Consider again. What does he say? Hath Christ spoken falsely? Where, I ask thee? “Where He says, ‘I go not up to the feast day;’ and went up.” For my part, I should wish thoroughly to examine this place, if so be we may see that Christ did not speak falsely. Yea rather, seeing that I have no doubt that Christ did not speak falsely, I will either thoroughly examine this passage and understand it, or, not understanding it, I will defer it. Yet that Christ spoke falsely will I never say. Grant that I have not understood it; I will depart in my ignorance. For better is it with piety to be ignorant, than with madness to pronounce judgment. Notwithstanding we are trying to examine, if so be by His assistance, who is the Truth, we may find something, and be found something ourselves, and this something will not be in the Truth a lie. For if in searching I find a lie, I find not a something but a nothing. Let us then look where it is thou sayest that Christ lied. He will say, “In that He said, ‘I go not up to this feast,’ and went up.” Whence dost thou know that He said so? What if I were to say, nay, not I, but any one, for God forbid that I should say it; what if another were to say, “Christ did not say this;” whereby dost thou refute him, whereby wilt thou prove it? Thou wouldest open the book, find the passage, point it out to the man, yea with great confidence force the book upon him if he resisted, “Hold it, mark, read, it is the Gospel you have in your hands.” But why, I ask thee, why dost thou so rudely accost this feeble one? Do not be so eager; speak more composedly, more tranquilly. See, it is the Gospel I have in my hands; and what is there in it? He answers: “The Gospel declares that Christ said what thou deniest.” And wilt thou believe that Christ said it, because the Gospel declares it? “Decidedly for that reason,” says he. I marvel exceedingly how thou shouldest say that Christ lieth, and the Gospel doth not lie. But lest haply when I speak of the Gospel, thou shouldest think of the book itself, and imagine the parchment and ink to be the Gospel, see what the Greek word means; Gospel is “a good messenger,” or “a good message.” The messenger then doth not lie, and doth He who sent him, lie? This messenger, the Evangelist to wit, to give his name also, this John who wrote this, did he lie concerning Christ, or say the truth? Choose which you will, I am ready to hear you on either side. If he spake falsely, you have no means of proving that Christ spake those words. If he said the truth, truth cannot flow from the fountain of falsehood. Who is the Fountain? Christ: let John be the stream. The stream comes to me, and you say to me, “Drink securely;” yea, whereas you alarm me as to the Fountain Himself, whereas you tell me there is falsehood in the Fountain, you say to me, “Drink securely.” What do I drink? What said John, that Christ spake falsely? Whence came John? From Christ. Is he who came from Him, to tell me truth, when He from whom he came lied? I have read in the Gospel plainly, “John lay on the Lord’s Breast;” but I conclude that he drank in truth. What saw he as he lay on the Lord’s Breast? What drank he in? what, but that which he poured forth? “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The Same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by Him, and without Him was nothing made. That which was made in Him was life, and the Life was the Light of men; And the Light shineth in darkness, and the darkness comprehended It not;” nevertheless It shineth, and though I chance to have some obscurity, and cannot thoroughly comprehend It, still It shineth. “There was a man sent from God, whose name was John; he came to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe. He was not the Light:” who? John: who? John the Baptist. For of him saith John the Evangelist, “He was not the Light;” of whom the Lord saith, “He was a burning, and a shining lamp.” But a lamp can be lighted, and extinguished. What then? whence drawest thou the distinction? of what place art thou enquiring? He to whom the lamp bare witness, “was the True Light.” Where John added, “the True,” there art thou looking out for a lie. But hear still the same Evangelist John pouring forth what he had drunk in; “And we beheld,” saith he, “His glory.” What did he behold? what glory beheld he? “The glory as of the Only-Begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth.” See then, see, if we ought not haply to restrain weak or rash disputings, and to presume nothing false of the truth, to give to the Lord what is His due; let us give glory to the Fountain, that we may fill ourselves securely. “Now God is true, but every man a liar.” What is this? God is full; every man is empty; if he will be filled, let him come to Him That is full. “Come unto Him, and be enlightened.” Moreover, if man is empty, in that he is a liar, and he seeks to be filled, and with haste and eagerness runs to the fountain, he wishes to be filled, he is empty. But thou sayest, “Beware of the fountain, there is falsehood there.” What else sayest thou, but “there is poison there”?
Ex ipsa Evangelii veritate Christus a mendacio vindicatus. Vide aliud. Quid dicit? Mentitus est Christus. Ubi, rogo te? Ubi dixit, Non ascendo ad diem festum, et ascendit. Ego quidem perscrutari velim istum locum, ne forte non sit Christus mentitus. Imo quia non dubito Christum non esse mentitum, locum istum aut perscrutabor et intelligam, aut non intelligens differam. Christum tamen mentitum esse non dicam. Fac me non intellexisse: discedam nesciens. Melius est enim cum pietate nescire, quam cum insania judicare. Tamen tentamus discutere, ne forte illo adjuvante qui Veritas est, aliquid inveniamus, aliquid et inveniamur, et ipsum aliquid non erit in veritate mendacium. Nam si quaerendo, mendacium invenio; non aliquid, sed nihil invenio. Ergo quaeramus ubi dicis Christum esse mentitum. Quia dixit, inquit, Non ascendo ad diem festum, et ascendit. Unde scis eum dixisse? Quid, si ego dicam, imo non ego, sed aliquis; absit enim ut hoc ego dicam: quid, si dicat alius, Hoc Christus non dixit? unde convincis, unde probaturus es? Codicem aperturus, lectionem inventurus, homini demonstraturus, imo cum magna fiducia pectoris resistenti codicem impacturus: Tene, attende, lege, Evangelium portas. Quid ergo, rogo te, quid conturbas paululum? Noli urgere, dic planius, tranquillius. Ecce Evangelium porto, et quid hinc? Ille: Evangelium loquitur Christum dixisse quod negas. Et ideo credes hoc dixisse Christum, quia loquitur Evangelium? Ideo plane, inquit. Ego multum miror, quomodo dicas mentiri Christum et non mentiri Evangelium. Sed ne forte, cum dico Evangelium, codicem attendas, membranam et atramentum cogitas Evangelium, quid dicat vide graecum nomen: Evangelium est bonus nuntius, vel bona annuntiatio. Nuntius ergo non mentitur, et qui eum misit, mentitur? Iste nuntius, Evangelista scilicet, ut nomen etiam dicamus, iste Joannes qui hoc scripsit, de Christo mentitus est, an verum dixit? Elige quod vis, ego ad utrumque te audire paratus sum. Si mentitus est, non est unde probes Christum illa dixisse. Si verum dixit, de fonte falsitatis veritas non fluit. Quis est fons? Christus: rivulus sit Joannes. Venit ad me rivulus, et dicis mihi, Bibe securus: et cum de ipso fonte me terreas, cum in fonte esse falsitatem dicas, dicis mihi, Bibe securus. Quid bibo? Quid dixit Joannes? Christum esse mentitum? Unde venit Joannes? A Christo. Vera mihi dicturus est qui ab illo venit, cum mentiebatur ille a quo venit? Legi plane in Evangelio, Joannes super pectus Domini discumbebat : sed puto quia veritatem bibebat. Quid vidit super pectus Domini discumbens? Quid bibit? quid, nisi quod ructuavit? In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum: hoc erat in principio apud Deum. Omnia per ipsum facta sunt, et sine ipso factum est nihil. Quod factum est, in eo vita est, et vita erat lux hominum, et lux in tenebris lucet, et tenebrae eam non comprehenderunt: tamen lucet, et si ego forte obscuritatis aliquid habeo, nec comprehendere ad perfectum valeam, illa lucet. Fuit homo missus a Deo, cui nomen erat Joannes: hic venit ut testimonium perhiberet de lumine, ut omnes crederent per ipsum. Non erat ille lumen: quis? Joannes; quis? Joannes Baptista. De ipso enim dicit Joannes evangelista, Non erat ille lumen: de quo dicit Dominus, Erat lucerna ardens et lucens . Sed lucerna et accendi et exstingui potest. Quid ergo? unde distinguis? De quo loco quaeris? Cui lucerna testimonium perhibebat, erat lumen verum. Ubi addidit Joannes verum, ibi tu quaeris mendacium. Adhuc audi ipsum Joannem evangelistam ructuantem quod biberat: Et vidimus, inquit, gloriam ejus. Quid vidit? quam gloriam vidit? Gloriam tanquam Unigeniti a Patre, plenum gratia et veritate . Vide igitur, vide ne forte debeamus disputationes infirmas vel temerarias cohibere, et de veritate nihil falsi praesumere, dare Domino quod debetur: fonti gloriam demus, ut securi impleamur. Deus autem verax: omnis autem homo mendax . Quid est hoc? Deus plenus est: omnis homo inanis est: si vult impleri, accedat ad plenum. Accedite ad eum, et illuminamini . Porro si homo inanis est, quia mendax est, et quaerit impleri, et cum festinatione atque aviditate currit ad fontem, impleri vult, inanis est. Sed tu dicis, Cave fontem, est ibi mendacium. Quid aliud dicis quam, Est ibi venenum?
83.7 PL 38, 741
7. “You have already,” he says, “said all, already have you checked, already chastened me. But tell me how He did not speak falsely who said, ‘I go not up,’ and went up?” I will tell you, if I can; but think it no little matter, that if I have not established you in the truth, I have yet kept you back from rashness. I will nevertheless tell you, what I imagine you know even already, if you remember the words which I have set forth to you. The words themselves solve the difficulty. That feast was kept for many days. On this, that is this present feast day, saith He, this day, that is when they hoped, He went not up; but when He Himself resolved to go. Now mark what follows, “When He had said these words, He Himself stayed in Galilee.” So then He did not go up on that feast day. For His brethren wished that He should go first; therefore had they said, “Pass from hence into Judæa.” They did not say, “Let us pass,” as though they would be His companions; or, “Follow us into Judæa,” as though they would go first; but as though they would send Him before them. He wished that they should go before; He avoided this snare, impressing His infirmity as Man, hiding the Divinity; this He avoided, as when He fled into Egypt. For this was no effect of want of power, but even of truth, that He might give an example of caution; that no servant of His might say, “I do not fly, because it is disgraceful;” when haply it might be expedient to fly. As He was going to say to His disciples, “When they have persecuted you in this city, flee ye into another;” He gave them Himself this example. For He was apprehended, when He willed; He was born, when He willed. That they might not anticipate Him then, and announce that He was coming, and plots be prepared; He said, “I go not up to this feast day.” He said, “I go not up,” that He might be hid; He added “this,” that He might not lie. Something He expressed, something He suppressed, something He repressed; yet said He nothing false, for “nothing false proceedeth out of His Mouth.” Finally, after He had said these words, “When His brethren were gone up;” the Gospel declares it, attend, read what you have objected to me; see if the passage itself do not solve the difficulty, see if I have taken from anywhere else what to say. This then the Lord was waiting for, that they should go up first, that they might not announce beforehand that He was coming, “When His brethren were gone up, then went He also up to the feast day, not openly, but as it were in secret.” What is, “as it were in secret”? He acts there as if in secret. What is, “as it were in secret”? Because neither was this really in secret. For He did not really make an effort to be concealed, who had it in His Own power when He would be taken. But in that concealment, as I have said, He gave His weak disciples, who had not the power to prevent being taken when they would not, an example of being on their guard against the snares of enemies. For He went up afterwards even openly, and taught them in the temple; and some said, “‘ Lo, this is He; lo, He is teaching.’ Certainly our rulers said that they wished to apprehend Him: ‘Lo, He speaketh openly, and no one layeth hands on Him.’”
Solutio quaestionis. Jam, inquit, omnia dixisti, jam me cohibuisti, jam castigasti. Dic mihi quomodo non sit mentitus, qui dixit, Non ascendo, et ascendit? Dicam, si potero: parum tibi non sit, quia etsi non te constitui in veritate, prohibui tamen a temeritate. Dicam tamen, quod et tu jam, si meministi verba quae commendavi, puto quia cognoscis. Ipsa verba solvunt quaestionem. Multis diebus agebatur ille dies festus. Ad istum, utique hodiernum diem, inquit, festum, istum utique hodiernum quando illi sperabant, non ascendit; sed quando ipse disponebat. Denique attende quod sequitur: Haec cum dixisset, ipse mansit in Galilaea. Ergo non ascendit ad istum diem festum. Volebant enim fratres ejus, ut ipse prior iret; ideo illi dixerant, Transi hinc in Judaeam. Non dixerant, Transeamus, quasi comites ejus futuri; aut, Sequere nos in Judaeam, tanquam priores ituri; sed tanquam praemissuri. Hoc ille voluit, ut illi praecederent: hoc vitavit, commendans hominis infirmitatem, occultans divinitatem; hoc vitavit, sicut cum in Aegyptum fugit . Non enim erat impotentiae: sed et hoc veritatis, ut daret exemplum cavendi: ne quisquam servus ejus diceret, Non fugio, quia turpe est; cum forte expediret ut fugeret. Dicturus suis, Cum vos persecuti fuerint in hac civitate, fugite in aliam ; hoc ipse exemplum praebuit. Nam quando voluit, prehensus est; quando voluit, natus est. Hoc ergo, ne illi praevenirent, et eum venturum esse nuntiarent, et praepararentur insidiae: Non ascendo, inquit, ad diem festum. Dixit: Non ascendo, ut occultaretur: addidit istum, ne mentiretur. Aliquid intulit, aliquid abstulit, aliquid distulit: nihil tamen falsi dixit, quia nihil falsi de ejus ore procedit. Denique posteaquam haec dixit, Ubi autem ascenderunt fratres ejus: Evangelium loquitur; attende, lege quod mihi offerebas; vide si non ipsa lectio solvit quaestionem, vide si aliunde sumpsi quod dicerem. Hoc ergo Dominus exspectabat, ut priores illi ascenderent, ne venturum praenuntiarent. Posteaquam ascenderunt fratres ejus, ascendit etiam ipse tunc ad diem festum, non evidenter, sed quasi occulte. Quid quasi occulte? Ibi facit quasi occulte. Quid quasi occulte? Quia nec hoc erat occulte. Non enim vere latere conabatur, qui in potestate habebat quando teneretur. Sed in illa, ut dixi, occultatione exemplum praebebat cavendi insidias inimicorum infirmis discipulis, qui potentiam non habebant, quando nollent ne prehenderentur. Nam ille etiam palam ascendit postea, et docebat eos in templo, et dicebant nonnulli: Ecce hic est, ecce docet. Certe dicebant nostri principes, quia apprehendere eum volebant: ecce palam loquitur, et nemo in eum manum mittit .
83.8 PL 38, 742
8. But now if we turn our attention to ourselves, if we think of His Body, how that we are even He. For if we were not He, “Forasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of Mine, ye have done it unto Me,” would not be true. If we were not He, “Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou Me?” would not be true. So then we are He, in that we are His members, in that we are His Body, in that He is our Head, in that Whole Christ is both Head and Body. Peradventure then He foresaw us that we were not to keep the feast days of the Jews, and this is, “I go not up to this feast day.” See neither Christ nor the Evangelist lied; of the which two if one must needs choose one, the Evangelist would pardon me, I would by no means put him that is true before the Truth Himself; I would not prefer him that was sent to Him by whom he was sent. But God be thanked, in my judgment what was obscure has been laid open. Your piety will aid me before God. Behold, I have, as I was best able, resolved the question, both concerning Christ and the Evangelist. Hold fast the truth with me as men who love it, embrace charity without contention.
Altera solutio. Jam vero si nos ipsos attendamus, si corpus ejus cogitemus, quia et nos ipse est. Nam etsi nos ipse non essemus, non esset verum, Cum uni ex minimis meis fecistis, mihi fecistis . Si nos ipse non essemus, non esset verum, Saule, Saule, quid me persequeris ? Ergo et nos ipse, quia nos membra ejus, quia nos corpus ejus, quia ipse caput nostrum , quia totus Christus caput et corpus. Forte ergo nos praevidebat, quia dies festos Judaeorum non eramus acturi, et hoc est, Ego non ascendo ad diem festum istum. Ecce nec Christus, nec Evangelista mentitus est: quorum duorum si alterum necesse est eligere, daret mihi veniam Evangelista, nullo modo veracem ipsi veritati praeponerem; missum ei a quo missus est, non praeferrem. Sed Deo gratias, quantum arbitror, renudatum est quod obscurum erat. Adjuvabit ad Deum pietas vestra. Ecce, sicut potui, solvi quaestionem, et in Christo et in Evangelista. Tene mecum, amice, veritatem, amplectere sine contentione charitatem.