The Letters of St. Jerome 126

san Girolamo (345–420 d.C.) · Epistolae · PL 22, 327–1224

126.0 To Marcellinus and Anapsychia PL 22, 1085

Marcellinus, a Roman official of high rank, and Anapsychia his wife had written to Jerome from Africa to ask him his opinion on the vexed question of the origin of the soul. Jerome in his reply briefly enumerates the several views that have been held on the subject. For fuller information he refers his questioners to his treatise against Rufinus and also to their bishop Augustin who will, he says, explain the matter to them by word of mouth. Although it hardly appears in this letter Jerome is a decided creationist (see his Comm. on Eccles. xii. 7). But, though he vehemently condemns Rufinus (Ap. ii. 10) for professing ignorance on the subject, he assents (Letter CXXXIV.) to Augustin (Letter CXXXI.) who similarly professes ignorance but seems to lean to traducianism. The date of writing is a.d. 412.

To his truly holy lord and lady, his children worthy of the highest respect and affection, Marcellinus and Anapsychia, Jerome sends greeting.

126.1 To Marcellinus and Anapsychia PL 22, 1085

1. I have at last received from Africa your joint letter and no longer regret the effrontery which led me, in spite of your silence to ply you both with so many missives. I hoped, indeed, by so doing to gain a reply and to learn of your welfare not indirectly from others but directly from yourselves. I well remember your little problem about the nature of the soul; although I ought not to call it little, seeing that it is one of the greatest with which the church has to deal. You ask whether it has fallen from heaven, as Pythagoras, all Platonists, and Origen suppose; or whether it is part of God’s essence as the Stoics, Manes, and the Spanish Priscillianists hint. Whether souls created long since are kept in God’s storehouse as some ecclesiastical writers foolishly imagine; or whether they are formed by God and introduced into bodies day by day according to that saying in the Gospel: “my Father worketh hitherto and I work;” or whether, lastly, they are transmitted by propagation. This is the view of Tertullian, Apollinaris, and most western writers who hold that soul is derived from soul as body is from body and that the conditions of life are the same for men and brutes. I have given my opinion on the matter in my reply to the treatise which Rufinus presented to Anastasius, bishop of Rome, of holy memory. He strives in this by an evasive and crafty but sufficiently foolish confession to play with the simplicity of his hearers, but only succeeds in playing with his own faith or rather want of it. My book, which has been published a good while, contains an answer to the calumnies which in his various writings Rufinus has directed against me. Your reverend father Oceanus has, I think, a copy of it. But if you cannot procure it your bishop Augustine is both learned and holy. He will teach you by word of mouth and will give you his opinion, or rather mine, in his own words.

Tandem ex Africa vestrae litteras unanimitatis accepi; et non me poenitet impudentiae, qua tacentibus vobis epistolas meas frequenter ingessi, ut rescriptum mererer, et vos esse sospites, non aliis nuntiantibus, sed vestro potissimum sermone cognoscerem. Super animae statu memini vestrae quaestiunculae, imo maxime ecclesiasticae quaestionis: Utrum lapsa de coelo sit, ut Pythagoras philosophus, omnesque Platonici, et Origenes putant: An a propria Dei substantia, ut Stoici, Manichaeus, et Hispana Priscilliani haeresis suspicantur: An in thesauro habeantur Dei, olim 949 conditae, ut quidam Ecclesiastici stulta persuasione confidunt: An quotidie a Deo fiant, et mittantur in corpora, secundum illud, quod in Evangelio scriptum est, Pater meus usque modo operatur, et ego operor : An certe ex traduce, ut Tertullianus, Apollinaris, et maxima pars Occidentalium autumant; ut, quomodo corpus ex corpore, sic anima nascatur ex anima, et simili cum brutis animantibus conditione subsistat. Super quo quid mihi videretur [al. videatur ], in opusculis contra Ruffinum scripsisse me novi, adversus eum libellum, quem sanctae memoriae Anastasio Episcopo Romanae Ecclesiae dedit [al. edidit ]: in quo lubrica et subdola, imo stulta confessione, dum auditorum simplicitati illudere nititur, suae fidei, imo perfidiae illusit: quos libros reor sanctum parentem vestrum habere Oceanum. Olim enim editi sunt, multis Ruffini libris adversus calumnias respondentes. Certe habes ibi virum sanctum et eruditum Augustinum Episcopum, qui viva, ut aiunt, voce docere te poterit et suam, imo per se nostram explicare sententiam.

126.2 PL 22, 1086

2. I have long wished to attack the prophecies of Ezekiel and to make good the promises which I have so often given to curious readers. When, however, I began to dictate I was so confounded by the havoc wrought in the West and above all by the sack of Rome that, as the common saying has it, I forgot even my own name. Long did I remain silent knowing that it was a time to weep. This year I began again and had written three books of commentary when a sudden incursion of those barbarians of whom your Virgil speaks as the “far-wandering men of Barce” (and to whom may be applied what holy scripture says of Ishmael: “he shall dwell over against all his brethren”) overran the borders of Egypt, Palestine, Phenicia, and Syria, and like a raging torrent carried everything before them. It was with difficulty and only through Christ’s mercy that we were able to escape from their hands. But if, as the great orator says, “amid the clash of arms law ceases to be heard;” how much more truly may it be said that war puts an end to the study of holy scripture. For this requires plenty of books and silence and careful copyists and above all freedom from alarm and a sense of security. I have accordingly only been able to complete two books and these I have sent to my daughter, Fabiola, from whom you can if you like borrow them. For want of time I have not been able as yet to transcribe the rest. But when you have read these you will have seen the ante-chamber and will easily form from this a notion of the whole edifice. I trust in God’s mercy and believe that, as he has helped me in the difficult opening chapters of the prophecy, so he will help me in the chapters towards the close. These describe the wars of Gog and Magog, and set forth the mode of building, the plan, and the dimensions of the holy and mysterious temple.

Ezechielis volumen olim aggredi volui, et sponsionem creberrimam studiosis lectoribus reddere; sed in ipso dictandi exordio ita animus meus Occidentalium provinciarum, et maxime urbis Romae [al. Romanae ] vastatione confusus est, ut, juxta vulgare proverbium, proprium quoque ignorarem vocabulum: diuque tacui, sciens tempus esse lacrymarum. Hoc autem anno cum tres explicassem libros, subitus impetus barbarorum, de quibus tuus dicit Virgilius, lateque vagantes Barcaei , et sancta Scriptura de Ismahel, Contra faciem omnium fratrum suorum habitabit , sic Aegypti limitem, Palaestinae, Phoenicis, Syriae percurrit ad instar torrentis cuncta secum trahens, ut vix manus eorum misericordia Christi potuerimus evadere. Quod si, juxta inclytum oratorem, silent inter arma leges (Cicero pro Milone ), quanto magis studia Scripturarum? quae et librorum multitudine, et silentio, ac librariorum sedulitate, quodque proprium 950 est, securitate et otio dictantium indigent. Duos itaque libros misi sanctae filiae meae Fabiolae, quorum exempla [al. exemplaria ] si volueris, ab ipsa poteris mutuari. Pro angustia quippe temporis alios describere non potui: quos cum legeris et vestibula videris, facilis conjectura erit, qualis ipsa sit futura domus. Sed credo in Dei misericordia, qui nos adjuvit in difficillimo principio supradicti operis, quod ipse adjuvet et in penultimis Prophetae partibus, in quibus Gog et Magog bella narrantur: et in extremis, in quibus sacratissimi et inexplicabilis templi aedificatio, varietas, mensuraque describitur.

126.3 PL 22, 1087

3. Our reverend brother Oceanus to whom you desire an introduction is a great and good man and so learned in the law of the Lord that no words of mine are needed to make him able and willing to instruct you both and to explain to you in conformity with the rules which govern our common studies, my opinion and his on all questions arising out of the scriptures. In conclusion, my truly holy lord and lady, may Christ our God by his almighty power have you in his safekeeping and cause you to live long and happily.

Sanctus frater noster Oceanus, cui vos cupitis commendari, tantus et talis est, et sic eruditus in Lege Domini, ut, absque nostro rogatu, instruere [al. instituere ] vos possit, et nostram super cunctis quaestionibus Scripturarum pro modulo communis ingenii explicare sententiam. Incolumes vos et prolixa aetate florentes Christus Deus noster tueatur omnipotens, Domini vere sancti.

Philip Schaff and Henry Wace (eds.), New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1890-1900. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Salva per dopo

Inserisci la tua email: ti invieremo un link per accedere. Nessuna password. Ciò che salvi (voci, versetti, capitoli, documenti) ti segue su ogni dispositivo.