Jeremias
Prophetia JeremiæIntroductions
Enciclopedia Cattolica
The Judeo-Christian tradition recognizes J. as the author of the book that bears his name. The work of J. "is not a book in the ordinary sense of the word... It is called a 'book' today by practical convention, but strictly it should be called a 'collection of writings'" (G. Ricciotti [v. bibl.], p. 39).
For this reason it is difficult to give a brief summary of the book of J. Generally, beyond a prologue (ch. 1), five parts are distinguished: 1) 2, 1-20, 18: oracles against Judah pronounced between the 13th year of Josiah (626) and the 4th year of Jehoiakim (605); 2) 21, 1-29, 32: oracles on the disastrous end of Jerusalem and Judah; 3) 30, 1-33, 26: the future restoration of Israel; the messianic era; 4) 34, 1-45, 5: historical-biographical narrative of the siege of Jerusalem, of its fall, of the action carried out by J. in Palestine and then in Egypt among the group of fugitives after the assassination of Gedaliah; 5) 46, 1-51, 64: oracles against the nations (Egypt, Philistia, Moab, Ammon, Edom, Damascus, Kedar and other Arab kingdoms, Elam, Babylon); finally a historical epilogue (ch. 52) on the capture of Jerusalem and the various deportations carried out by the Babylonians. …
Haydock
Jeremias was a priest, a native of Anathoth, a priestly city, in the tribe of Benjamin, and was sanctified from his mother's womb to be a prophet of God; which office he began to execute when he was yet a child in age. He was in his whole life, according to the signification of his name, great before the Lord, and a special figure of Jesus Christ, in the persecutions he underwent for discharging his duty, in his charity for his persecutors, and in the violent death he suffered at their hands; it being an ancient tradition of the Hebrews, that he was stoned to death by the remnant of the Jews who had retired into Egypt, (Challoner) at Taphnes. His style is plaintive, (Worthington) like that of Simonides, (Calmet) and not so noble as that of Isaias and Osee. (St. Jerome) --- He was the prophet of the Gentiles, as well as of the Jews, predicting many things which befell both, and particularly the liberation of the latter, the year of the world 3485, after the seventy years' captivity, dating from the year of the world 3415, (Calmet) or 3398, the 4th of Joakim. (Usher) (chap. 25.) (Haydock) --- He began to prophesy when he was very young, the year of the world 3375, in the 13th year of Josias, (Calmet) before that prince had brought his reformation to any great perfection. (Haydock)
Douay 1582/1609
IEREMIE the sonne of Helcias, Priest and Prophete, being sanctified The summe of Ieremies life. in his mothers wombe, begane to prophecie as yet a childe, in Iuda; in the thirtenth yeare of the reigne of king Iosias; continued the rest of his time, which was nintene yeares more; and the eleuen yeares of Ioakim 4. Reg. 23. 24. (wherin are counted the three monethes of Ioachaz, and other three of Iechonias, otherwise called Ioachin) and eleuen yeares of Sedecias; in al fourtie one yeares; before he went into Aegypt. Where he also prophecied, •ha. 44. v. 8. and finally was stoned to death by the people, in the citie of Taphnis. His He wrote two Bookes & one Epistle. The contents of his bookes. whole worke conteyneth two distinct Bookes, besides an Epistle, which foloweth after the Prophecie of Baruch. The former booke is called his Prophecie, the other his Lamentations. S. Ierom comprehendeth the summe of al briefly, saying: Ieremie connecteth a nuttie (or watching) rodde, Epist. ad Paulin. and a potte boyling hote, from the face of the north, the leopard spoyled of his coloures; and the fourefold Alphabet in diuers meeters. Signifiing, that God wil correct his people with a rodde, in his hote furie, from the north, to witte, by the king of Babylon, for their pertinacitie in sundrie kindes of sinnes. Al which the Prophet lamenteth with his doleful verse of diuers meeter. The Prophecie may be diuided into fiue partes. His propheci⸢e⸣ diuided into fiue partes. First he sheweth the conditions and qualities of himselfe, with the maner eb. 1. of his mission: then Gods great clemencie in recalling the people from sinne, denouncing dangers imminent for their obstinacie: in the twelue first chapters. Secondly, in the eight chapters folowing by diuers Metaphorical, and 13. other figuratiue descriptions, he declareth the ingratitude, & other sinnes of the people, threatning punishment, for which they persecute him. Thirdly, 21. in other eight chapters, he reprehendeth the inhabitantes of Ierusalem, especially the King, euil Priestes, and falseprophetes, some being already caried into captiuitie: for which free preaching, he is againe persecuted. Fourtly 29. in the next eleuen chapters, he mixteth consolations & threates, especially the destruction of Ierusalem, captiuitie of king and people, and their release after seuentie yeares. Fiftly in the other thirtene chapters, he prophecieth the destruction 40. of the Iewes, that goe into Aegypt: and of sundrie nations for their idolatrie, and for their crueltie against the Iewes. In euerie part interposeth manie prophecies of Christ, and his Church: besides the mystycal sense included in the historical.
Cornely
CAPUT III. DE IEREMIAE LIBRIS ET DE PROPHETIA BARUCH 54 paragraphs
260. — Versus finem regni Manasse natus est propheta ille, qui continua sua atque fortissima lucta contra regum, sacerdotum, populi impietatem multisque, quas in munere suo obeundo perpessus est, persecutionibus prae reliquis excelluit!, neque tamen interitum regni luda impedire aut retardare, sed plangere tantum potuit: nomine quippe suo Jeremiae (« Deus proiiciet » sc. populum suum?) infelicem contribulium suorum sortem iam praesagivisse creditur ?. Patria ei fuit Anathoth, quae civitas tertio a Ierosolymis milliario in tribu Beniamin sita a Iosue filiis Aaron erat attributa et a posteris Itrhamar habitabatur?. Quare recte sentire arbitramur eos, qui contra Clementis Alex. aliorumque sententiam tenent, prophetae patrem Helciam, unum « de sacerdotibus, qui fuerunt in Anathoth in tribu Beniamin » (Ier. 1,1) alium fuisse atque Helciam summum sacerdotem, qui a. 18. losiae librum Legis a Moyse conscriptum in templo invenit; summi enim sacerdotes ex posteris Eleazari erant et lerosolymis habitabant *. Ante nativitatem suam iam sanctificatus et ad munus propheticum electus (ler. 1,5) viginti circiter annos natus munus suum obire iussus est a. 13. losiae*. Quod non nisi aliquantulum reluctans iuvenis divinae vocationi paruerit, mirum non est, si quae fuerit temporum illorum ratio consideratur.
Ezechiae, Isaiae amico, in throno davidico successerat filius Manasses, qui avi sui Achaz vesligia secutus inter omnes reges luda impiissimus longo regni sui tempore (696. -641.) flagitiis suis, quibus vel Apsos Chanaanitas superavit (& Reg. 21,11), interitum regni acceleravit. Neque enim excelsa tantum ab Ezechia destructa restituit aut aras Baal et idolum Astartae erexit, sicut Achab impius rex Israel , sed etiam « in duobus atriis templi Domini exstruxit altaria omni militiae coeli, in ipso templo idolum posuit, filium suum per ignem Moloch sacrificavit, observavit somnia, auguria sectatus est, maleficis artibus inservivit, magosque et incantatores secum habuit » (& Reg. 21,9 sqq.; 2 Paral. 33,3 sqq.) , uno verbo cultum veri Dei abstulit idololatriamque chanaaniticam invexit. Populus autem, qui sub avo eius Achaz idololatriae iam deditus erat, Ezechiae conatibus, id quod ex Isaiae Michaeaeque vaticiniis satis elucet, ad Dominum Deum suum non erat reductus; quamquam externus cultus a Lege praescriptus tempore Ezechiae floruerat, animi non erant mutati et idolis in occulto sacrificatum erat; quare facile intelligitur, quomodo Manasses Iudam et habitatores lerusalem seducere potuerit, ut eodem modo, quo ipse, facerent malum super omnes gentes, quas subverterat Dominus a facie filiorum Israel (2 Paral. 33,9). Frustra Deus eos tradidit in manus Assyriorum ; Manasses quidem captivus in Babyloniam abductus egit poenitentiam, at lerosolyma reversus, licet templum iterum aperiret cultumque legitimum restitueret, populum tamen ab idololatria plene revocare non potuit. Filium enim et successorem eius Amon (641.- 639.) videmus « cunctis idolis, quae Manasses fabricatus erat, immolare et servire et multo maiora delinquere » (2 Para/. 33,92 sq.; & Reg. 91, 20 sqq.). Quam ob causam minatus est Deus : « Ecce ego inducam mala super lerusalem et Iudam, ut quicunque audierit, tinniant ambae aures eius, et extendam super lerusalem funiculum Samariae et pondus domus Achab, et delebo lerusalem , sicut quis abstergit scutellam, abstergit et invertit eam » (4 Reg. 21,12 sq.). Qui tristis et perversus rerum status etiam primis Josiae (639.-608.) annis perduravit. Octo enim dumtaxat annos natus patri suo successit neque quidquam a puero, qui in idololatria enutritus erat, potuisse mutari evidens est ; sed « 8. regni anno, quum adhuc puer (sedecim annorum) esset, coepit quaerere Deum patris sui David et 19. regni anno mundavit Iudam et lerusalem ab excelsis et statuis Astartae simulacrisque et sculptilibus » (2 Paral. 35,3).
: leremias igitur, qui anno insequente (13. losiae) ad propheticum munus vocatus est, toto adolescentiae suae tempore effrenatam idololatriam, cui integer populus erat deditus, semper prae oculis habuerat; facile ergo iuventutem infirmitatemque excusare potuit, ut gravissimae et difficillimae vocationi sese subtraheret (Jer. 1,6); num iuvenis toti populo resistere eumque ad verum Deum revocare potuit? At quamprimum divini auxilii promissionem accepit, alacer sese subiecit, atque ab eo tempore « constitutus, ut evelleret et destrueret et dispergeret et dissiparet, sed etiam ut aedificaret et plantaret » (1,10), usque ad urbis destructionem nullis periculis perterritus neque persecutionibus tormentisque fractus munus suum fidelissime implevit. Verbum Dei nunc scriptis epistolis aut libris (29,1 sqq.; 36,2 sqq. 32 Bar. 6) nunc exhibitis signis symbolicis (18,1 sqq.; 19,1 sqq.; 27,2) annuntians, plerumque autem viva voce illud praedicans aut in templo (7,2; 26,1), aut in domo regia (22,1; 37,17), aut in portis urbis (17.
9), aut in domibus privatis (18,1; 19,1), aut in carcere (32,2) per quadraginta annos (1,3) fuit « civitas munita et columna ferrea et murus aereus toti terrae : regibus Iuda et principibus eius et sacerdotibus et populo universo » (1,18). Neque post urbis templique destructionem, quam Threnis suis planxití, populum reliquit. Apud pauperes, quos Chaldaei in terra devastata reliquerant, remanens (40,1-6), ut eos consolaretur et confortaret, frustra eos a fuga in Aegyptum avertere conatus est (40,7 -42,92) ; fugientes autem in Aegyptum sequi coactus (&3,1-'7) etiam in terra aliena muneri suo non defuit. Neque enim ipsa clade chaldaica Iudaei ad meliorem frugem erant reducti; sed novo cum ardore antiquae se dederunt idololatriae, quare novis poenis praedictis propheta eos emendare studuit (&43,8-44,30).
Vaticinia haec paucis annis post urbis destructionem pronuntiata prophetici eius muneris.ultima sunt documenta; ubi et quando mortuus sit, non constat. Secundum Tertullianum, S. Hieronymum, Ps. Epiphantum , S. Isidorum Hisp., quos sequuntur multi, Taphnis in Aegypto a contribulibus suis, quia illis totique Aegypto novam cladem per Nabuchodonosor inferendam praedixerat, lapidibus obrutus vitam finivit; secundum iudaicam quandam traditionem una cum Baruch, fideli suo ministro, a Nabuchodonosor, qui 27. regni sui anno Aegyptum expugnavit, in Babyloniam abductus ibique mortuus est ?. Quidquid de his traditionibus est, veri similius esse arbitramur prophetam usque ad medium circiter exsilium, i. e. usque ad regnum Evilmerodach (562. -560.), vitam protraxisse; cur enim ultimum libri caput aut ultimi versus ei abiudicentur, sufficiens non affertur ratio. . Praeter vaticiniorum suorum collectionem nobis reliquit Threnos de templi et urbis excidio epistolamque, qua Iudaeos in Babyloniam abducendos contra idololatriae periculum praemunivit quaeque hodie est caput 6. libri Baruch. Eum duos posteriores Regum libros scripsisse probabilis tenet sententia (99. tom. 1. p. 293 sqq.); demum de morte losiae quoque composuit Threnos (2 Para/. 35, 25), qui interierunt; de psalmis, qui ei attribuuntur, supra (188 p. 105) diximus.
abire « in Anathoth ad agrum suum »; Ieremiae quoque familia ibi possedit agrum (Ier. 32,6 sqq.). De situ civitatis cfr S. Hier. In lerem. 1,1 (M. 21,708), Fl. Ioseph. Antiq. X. 10; hodie vocatur Anáta estque viculus, uti iam S. Hieronymi aetate, qui « simplicitas eloquii, inquit, Ieremiae a loco in quo natus est, accidit. Fuit enim Anathothites, qui est usque hodie viculus » (In Ierem. Pract.)
$. S. Hieron. In Ierem. 1,1 censet « Ieremiam, quum adhuc puer esset, prophetare incepisse »; id autem immerito colligit ex prophetae verbis : Y2iN DR (1,6.); nam Salomon, postquam circiter decem octo annos natus thronum ascendit, sesc vocat Yep "91 (S. Hier. « parvulum puerum » 3 Reg. 3,7) et a Davide vocatur
1 02 (S. Hier. iterum : « puer parvulus » 1 Paral. 22,5); Ioseph quoque paullo antequam toti Aegypto praepositus est, vocatur 123 (Gen. 41,12).
261. — Paullo postquam losias cultum legitimum restituere coepisset, leremiam propheticum munus suscepisse diximus; quo quomodo sit functus, brevi ultimorum regum luda historia narrata accuratius ostendere non est inutile. In ipsa sua vocatione symbolo ollae super igne aestuantis edoctus erat, ab aquilone imminere populo periculum venturasque esse gentes, quae divinum iudicium de idololatria populi Iuda exsecutioni mandarent (1,13 sqq.). Manasse abominationes tantae fuerant, ut poenae averti non amplius possent (15,1-4); pro sua tamen misericordia Deus, ut quam plurimos salvaret, antea populo suo pium regem losiam suscitavit et magnum prophetam Ieremiam; prior restituto cultu, destructis omnibus excelsis idolorumque altaribus deletis peccandi occasionem a populi conspectu removit, alter ferventibus suis concionibus reformationem populi studiose fovit. Num propheta primis annis in sola patria munere sit functus, id quod nonnulli ex Anathothitarum persecutionibus, de quibus conqueritur (11,21 sqq.), non sine probabilitatis specie colligunt, an statim post vocationem Ierosolymis praedicare coeperit, ignoramus; id tamen videtur esse certum, eum ante 18. losiae annum Ierosolymis parem fuisse cognitum. Legatos enim de libro Legis reperto interrogaturos rex non ad Ieremiam misit aut ad Sophoniam, qui eodem circiter tempore vixit, sed ad Holdam. :»prophetidem (& Reg. 22,11-920). Quanta cum diligentia losias foedus, quod Legis repertae occasione una cum toto populo renovavit, et i ipse servaverit et a populo servandum curaverit, fuse narratur a sacris scriptoribus!; quomodo autem Ieremias regem adiuverit, docent vi-' ginti priora capita libri eius, quibus continetur summa eorum, quae ultimis losiae annis praedicavit; docent quoque persecutiones, quas illo iam tempore quum in patria sua (er. 11,91 sqq.) tum ab ipsis suis consanguineis (12,6) perpessus est. Tam altas enim radices egerat idololatria, ut nec regis nec prophetae auctoritate evelli possent. Frustra excelsa et idola erant destructa ; neque enim « cireumcidi Domino nec auferre praeputia cordium suorum » volebant filii Israel (4,4), sed templo Domini confisi omnibus vitiis sese dederunt (7,3 sqq.). Quocirca etiam publica idololatria statim revixit, quando losias in infelici suo bello contra Aegyptios prope Mageddo devictus et occisus est (& Reg. 23,99 sq.; 2 Paral. 35,20 sqq.). Nam secundus eius filius Ioachaz, quem populus sibi ipse regem constituit, « fecit malum coram Domino » avorum suorum exempla secutus (& Reg. 93,32.). Post tres quidem menses a Nechao iam throno privatus et vinctus in Aegyptum abductus est?, sed res in meliorem statum non sunt mutatae. Fratrem enim eius natu maiorem Eliacim, quem populus antea respuerat, Pharao constituit regem vertitque nomen eius Joakim. Undecim annis, quibus regnavit (608.- 597.) « malum fecit coram Domino iuxta omnia quae fecerant patres eius », populo vix minus odiosus quam Deo. Ut tributum a Nechao impositum solveret , subditis magna onera imposuit (& Reg. 23,33. 35), maioraque, ut magnifica sibi palatia exstrueret; « oculi enim eius et cor erant ad avaritiam et ad sanguinem innocentium effundendum et ad violentiam et oppressionem exercendam » (Ier. 22,13). Una cum Ieremia alii prophetae, inter quos Urias filius Semei de Cariathiarim, regem et populum ad sinceram conversionem , nisi interitum regni accelerare vellent, fortiter exhortati sunt; at Ieremias a sacerdotibus et pseudoprophetis et toto populo ad mortem postulatus solo magnatum favore sententiam capitis effugit, Uriam vero Ioakim. ad se adduci iussit « et percussit eum gladio et proiecit cadaver eius in sepulcris vulgi ignobilis » (26,1-24). Maturum igitur interitui fuit regnum, neque longe abfuit flagellum a Deo paratum. Assyria, qua olim usus erat Dominus ad populum suum puniendum et regnum Israel destruendum, propter superbiam suam reiecta interierat, sicut prophetae praedixerant (Is. 10,5 sqq. etc.) ; eius in locum successerat regnum Chaldaeorum. Eo autem tempore, quo Chaldaei in debellanda Assyria occupati erant, Aegyptii Asiam cis Euphratem sitam sibi subiecerant; quare vixdum Ninive capta Nabuchodonosor, quem pater eius Nabopalasar regni sui socium fecerat, exercitum contra Aegyptios duxit regemque Nechao a. 4. regis Ioakim (a. 605.) prope Charcamis devicit (erem. 46,2) rapidoque cursu Syriam et Palaestinam occupavit. lerusalem quoque cepit, Ioakim tributarium fecit, iuvenes nobiles multos, inter quos Daniel, in Babyloniam abduxit asportavitque partem vasorum domus Dei et posuit ea in domo thesauri Dei sui?. Ab hoc anno incipiunt septuaginta captivitatis anni, quos leremias a. &. Iloakim brevi ante Nabuchodonosoris victoriam clare praedixerat : « et erit universa terra haec in solitudinem et in stuporem et servient omnes gentes istae regi Babylonis septuaginta annis » (25,1. 8-11). At prima hac clade non correctus est rex; insequente enim anno (a. 5. loakim), quum Ieremias iussus a Deo valicinia ministro suo Baruch dictasset, rex volumen sibi afferri iussit et combussit, prophetam ad mortem quaesivit, abscondit autem eum Dominus; ad maiores ergo poenas deveniendum erat, quas propheta praedixit (36,9-31). Tribus annis Ioakim mansit servus Chaldaeorum, deinde rebellavit; sed Nabuchodonosor, qui eo tempore in interiore Asia occupatus erat, contra eum misit turbas vicinarum gentium , quae terram devastabant; loakim ipse autem in hoc bello secundum prophetae praedictionem (22,18 sqq.; 36,30) ignobili morte occubuit. Filius eius et successor Joachin (lechonias) patri in omnibus similis tribus tantum mensibus regnavit; praedixerat enim Deus : « dabo tein manu quaerentium animam tuam et in manu quorum tu formidas faciem, et in manu Nabuchodonosor regis Babylonis. Et mittam te et matrem tuam in terram alienam ibique moriemini, et in terram, ad quam levant animam suam ut revertantur illuc, non revertentur... Scribe istum virum sterilem; nec enim erit de semine eius, qui sedeat super solium David et potestatem habeat ultra in Iuda » (22,94 -30). Revera Nabuchodonosor, quum interioris Asiae res composuisset, duces cum exercitu miserat, qui regnum Iuda propter rebellionem Ioakim punirent ; obsederunt civitatem sanctam , quando Nabuchodonosor advenit et lechonias, ut maiorem cladem ase averteret, cum matre sua et principibus regi sese ipse dedit. Cum omnibus principibus et ducibus et robore populi translatus est in Babyloniam, nihilque relictum est exceptis pauperibus terrae (& Reg. 25,10 sqq.), quibus Nabuchodonosor tamquam novum regem praefecit lechoniae patruum Mathaniam, tertium losiae filium, cui nomen imposuit Sedeciam.
Undecim annis regnavit Sedecias (597.-586.) et fecit malum coram Domino iuxta omnia, quae fecerat Ioakim (& Reg. 25,19). « Sicut ficus pessimae, quae comedi non possunt eo quod sint malae, ita Sedecias rex Iuda et principes eius et reliqui de lerusalem erant, qui remanserant in urbe « (ler. 25,8); « principes sacerdotum et populus praevaricati sunt iuxta abominationes gentium et polluerunt domum Domini », (2 Par. 36,18; cfr Ezech. 8,2-18), atque summa invaluit in iure dicendo negligentia et iniustitia (erem. 91,11 sq.) ; rex vero de iugo Chaldaeorum excutiendo quam de idololatria reprimenda et de moribus populi reformandis cum magnatibus deliberare maluit. Imbecillo enim erat ingenio consiliaque semper mutavit. lam in principio regni, quum Nabuchodonosor, ut videtur, Aelamitis subiiciendis distineretur (49,35 sq.) cum legatis vicinarum gentium de repellendis Chaldaeis consilium inierat a pseudoprophetis seductus, licet Ieremias voluntatem Dei esse asseruisset, ut Iudaei sub Chaldaeorum dominio quieti remanerent (27,1 sqq.)*; nulla autem spe felicis exitus affulgente, Sedecias per legatos iram Nabuchodonosor placare conatus erat(28,1 sqq.). Quin etiam a. 4. regni, quum novi rebellionis conatus per pseudoprophetam Hananiam provocati essent (28,1-17), rex ipse Babylonem proficisci debuit (51,59). At occaecati divinae voluntati acquiescere nolentes aperta tandem rebellione finem regni destructionemque civitatis accelerarunt. Aegyptiorum auxilio fretus a. 8. vel 9. regni sui Sedecias fregit pactum, quod iureiurando confirmaverat (EzecA. 171,15 sqq.; cfr 2 Paral. 36,13) et & Nabuchodonosor defecit. Qui statim profectus in Reblatha ad Orontem consedit (& Reg. 25,6), ut contra regem Iuda eiusque socios bellum administraret. Contra Ierusalem misit praecipuos suos duces, qui reliquis civitatibus occupatis mense 10. a. 9. Sedeciae urbem sanctam obsederunt (Jer. 39,1). Duobus annis duravit obsessio; sollemni legatione rex prophetam rogavit, ut apud Deum pro populo intercederet (21,1), quin etiam ut Dominum sibi propitium redderet, cum toto populo voto sese obstrinxit ad dimittendos omnes servos Hebraeos, quos contra Legem detinebant (34,8 sqq.). leremias vero certam fore urbis expugnationem semper praedixit deditionemque et fugam velut unicum salutis remedium suasit (21,3 sqq.; 32,3 sqq.; 35,9 Sqq. etc.), neque sententiam mutavit, quando Aegyptiorum exercitu Chaldaei a&b urbe obsessa ad tempus recedere sunt coacti (37,5 sqq.). Revera Aegyptii re infecta in terram suam reversi sunt, et Chaldaei interruptam obsessionem receperunt. Interea prophetae inimici eum ad Chaldaeos fugere voluisse praetexuerant durissimumque in carcerem iniecerant; ex quo a Sedecia liberatus in atrio carceris custoditus est (31,10-20), donec iterum a principibus ad mortem postulatus permittente Sedecia in lacum, « in quo non erat aqua sed lutum » demissus ;est, ut fame periret. At etiam ex hoc periculo Deus eum liberavit per Abdemelech Aethiopem, qui precibus suis a rege obtinuit, ut denuo in vestibulo carceris propheta detineretur (38,1- 13). Ibi permansit, 'usque dum post urbis expugnationem iussu Nabuchodonosoris liber abire permissus est. Mense &. a. 11. Sedeciae dirupta est civitas et pars eius occupata; Sedecias fugit, sed in deserto lericho captus et Reblatham ad Nabuchodonosor adductus coram se filios suos occidi vidit; deinde oculis effossis vinctus catenis abductus est in Babyloniam, ubi in carcere mortuus est (52,6- 11 cfr & Reg. 25,5 sqq.). Ultimus fuit rex Iuda; mense enim 5. eiusdem anni Nabuzardan, princeps exercitus chaldaici, « succendit domum Domini et domum regis et domos lerusalem omnemque domum combussit igne; et muros lerusalem in circuitu destruxit exercitus Chaldaeorum » (& Reg. 25,8 sqq.). Soli pauperes relicti sunt in Palaestina, quibus praefectus est Godolias, filius Ahicam; Ieremias autem habitavit cum eo in medio populi, qui relictus fuerat (erem. &0,1 sq.), usque dum Godolia occiso cum reliquiis in Aegyptum transmigrare coactus est (er. &2. &3.).
kim, Sedecias, Sellum; primogenitus Iohanan iuvenis mortuus esse videtur, nam in Scriptura non amplius commeinoratur; Ioakim et Sedecias, filii Iosiae, regnaverunt postquam Ioachaz in Aegyptum abductus est; Sellum igitur, quum a populo rex eleotus esset, nomen suum mutasse videtur (Ioachaz), sicuti etiam Ioakim vocatus est prius Eliacim et Sedecias Mathania (4 Reg. 23,34; 24,17). Cur 1 Par. 3,15 Sellum quarto loco ponatur, quum Sedecia esset maior natu (cfr 4 Reg. 23,31. 36; 24,18), non liquet. i ficiscebatur in Tharsis ». Gen. 37,30 etc.). Ea, quae scriptores profani et monumenta de Nabuchodonosore tradunt, collegerunt Vigourour La Bible et les découvertes modernes IV. p. 293 sqq., Brunengo L'impero di Babilonia e di Ninive II. p. 260 sqq. eto.
Praeter duos posteriores Regum libros, de quibus iam egimus, leremias duo opera prophetica (collectionem vaticiniorum et epistolam de idololatriae absurditate) unumque poeticum (Threnos de excidio urbis et templi) nobis reliquit. De quibus totidem paragraphis disseremus epistolam cum libro Baruch coniungentes, quippe cui in editionibus nostris adnexa sit. A vaticiniorum autem collectione initium capiemus, quoniam Prophetia Ieremiae, uti a Vulgata inscribitur, praecipuum eius est opus atque vere insigne documentum fidelitatis, qua quinquaginta circiter annis munere prophetico est functus.
262. — Antequam vero consuetas nostras quaestiones de operis argumento, ordine, origine, authentia aggrediamur, pauca sunt praemittenda de duplici recensione, qua nobis est conservatum. Origenes iam monuit, in alexandrina versione alio modo, quam in primigenio textu vaticinia esse disposita atque satis magnam inter graeca et hebraica exemplaria inveniri lectionum discrepantiam. Vehementius pro more suo conqueritur S. Hieronymus, in exemplaribus suo tempore usitatis ordinem librariorum errore esse confusum et multa deesse, promittitque sese iis quae desint ex hebraeo fonte digestis et completis novum ex veteri verumque pro corrupto et falsato prophetam lectoribus esse daturum!, Reapse longius, quam in plerisque aliis libris, versio alexandrina cum omnibus suis filiis a massorethico textu recedit. Ad ordinem quod attinet, "vaticinia omnia contra exteras gentes, quae textus hebraeus eumque secutus S. Hieronymus in fine libri exhibent (46. -51.), Alexandrini medio libro (post 25,13) inserunt alioque ordine ea disponunt?. In textu ipso versio graeca interdum paucula vocabula vel etiam minora membra addit, vix tamen plura, quam in aliis libris; sed multo frequentius omittit singula vocabula vel minora phrasium membra, immo aliquas phrases integras atque adeo pericopas duas, ut octava circiter parte graecus liber brevior sit hebraico et nostro latino?. Unde duplex quaestio ab interpretibus agitatur, quomodo scilicet magna illa differentia sit exorta, atque uter textus sit praeferendus*.
Omittere licet illorum sententiam, qui variis admissis vaticiniorum collectionibus vel editionibus, quas propheta ipse aut iuniores redactores adornaverint, priorem quaestionem, solvere volunt. Neque enim tantum fundamento historico caret, nec ad discrepantiarum originem explicandam requiritur, sed etiam hodiernorum textuum conditione refellitur. Profecto si duae collectiones veleditiones, quaea diversis redactoribus adornatae inter se non dependent, alexandrinae versionis et massorethicae recensionis essent fontes, multo maiorem quum in numero et ordine vaticiniorum , tum in lectionibus deprehenderemus diversitaltem; substantialis autem differentia inter utrumque textum non adest. Altera vero ex parte ab eorum quoque discedimus sententia, qui sive librariorum sive interpretis negligentiae dumtaxat vel inscitiae vel festinationi omnes discrepantias attribuendas putant. Nam licet longe plerasque, praesertim minores, ex illis fontibus iure derivari concedamus5, aliae tamen sunt eaeque graviores, quae apte non explicantur, nisi primitivum libri textum consulto et deliberate mutatum esse dicamus. Huc praesertim spectat diversus vaticiniorum contra gentes ordo, huc quoque iure trahitur omissio pericopae 39,5- 13, quae, sicut modernis nonnullis interpretibus, quia contextum perturbet, parum probatur, etiam antiquo diasceuastae, quoniam difficultatem quandan creat, displicuisse videtur; huc etiam pertinere arbitramur omissionem nonnullarum sententiarum, quae quoniam alio in contextu iisdem fere verbis a propheta iam erant enuntiatae, abundare videbantur etc 5. Num vero deliberatae hae mutationes graeco interpreti debeantur, an &b eoiam in suo exemplari hebraico sint repertae , controvertitur; rectius tamen illos iudicare censemus, qui illas versione graeca dicunt antiquiores. Nam Ieremiae interpres servili quodam modo saltem plerumque totidem fere verbis et eodem vocabulorum ordine, quantum fieri potest, retento hebraicum textum reddidit; suspicari igitur non licet eum arbitrario prorsus modo integras phrases aut sententias aut pericopas omisisse ordinemque vaticiniorum mutasse. Probabilior igitur est sententia, antiquitus duas recensiones hebraicas libri nostri exstitisse, quarum una fons est textus, quem transtulerunt Alexandrini, altera vero fons textus massorethici.
Interroganti, utra sit praeferenda, respondemus, neutram omni ex parte primitivo Ieremiae libro esse conformem, utramque suis ornari virtutibus suisque deformari naevis, utramque autem vera gaudere auctoritate atque genuino textui inveniendo inservire. Revera utraque usi sunt sacri scriptores N. T.; nam si MattA. 2,18 massorethicam recensionem, ubi a graeca aliquantum discedit, secutus est (erem. 31, 15), S. Paulus (Hebr. 8,9) graecam recensionem allegat, licet a massorethica dissentiat (lerem. 31,32)7. Utraque approbata est ab Ecclesia ; &lexandrina enim recensione usi sunt tantum non omnes Christiani sex primis saeculis et hodie utuntur pleraeque ecclesiae orientales; massorethicam recensionem, quam S. Hieronymus transtulit, inde a 6. saec. adhibuit et adhibet integer Occidens. Auctoritatem igitur utraque , ut S. Hieronymi argumento utamur, « vetustate et usu meruit ». Plenior est textus massorethicus, neque prudenti, opinor, potest esse dubium, quin maiores saltem pericopae, quibus alexandrinus textus caret (atque praesertim 33,14-26), authenticae sint et canonicae. Etenim ut taceamus, decreto tridentino, quo omnes libros sacros cum omnibus suis partibus, prout in ecclesia catholica legi consueverunt et in Vulgata habentur, pro sacris et canonicis recipere iubemur, etiam pericopas Ieremiae maiores illas comprehendi$, critica quoque argumenta illis favent, praesertim quum satis perspicuae sint rationes, quibus permotus alexandrinae recensionis diasceuastes eas omittere maluit?. De minoribus autem discrepantiis diiudicare criticorum est, qui interdum recensionem massorethicam , interdum alexandrinam praeferendam esse invenient. Ordine demum alexandrinam massorethicae praestare censemus. Parum aptum enim locum in nostris editionibus vaticinia contra gentes occupant, quum nec cum praecedentibus nec cum sequentibus ullum habeant nexum; neque quisquam nobis dixerit, cur auctor vel redactor vaticiniis contra gentes historicam relationem de excidio sanctae civitatis et templi et de sorte lechoniae adnexuerit. In alexandrina autem recensione, quae vaticinia post 25,13 inserit, omnia optime cohaerent, immo massorethicus textus ipse innuit, illa olim ibidem suam sedem habuisse. Haec enim legimus (25,13) : « Et adducam super terram illam (Chaldaeorum) omnia verba mea, quae locutus sum contra eam, omnia scripta in. libro hoc, quae prophetavit Ieremias contra gentes ». Nonne mirum videtur, quod Deus se adducturum dicat, « quae Ieremias prophetavit contra gentes »? Num similis loquendi modus alibi reperitur? Nonne magis mirum, quod ea, quae scripta dicuntur in libro hoc, necdum scripta erant « in libro hoc » nec statim erant scribenda, sed post viginti demum capita, quae de aliis agunt, velut appendix terminato libro addenda ? Supponamus autem, olim immediate secuta esse vaticinia contra gentes, atque omnis difficultas evanescit. Verba enim « quae prophetavit Ieremias contra gentes » inscriptio sunt sequentium vaticiniorum, similis aliis novarum par- tium inscriptionibus, nec ullo modo cum praecedentibus connectenda ; ipsa autem massorethica recensio verba ita intelligenda esse docet, quum eadem 46,1 repetat. Accedit, quod singulorum quoque vaticiniorum contra gentes ordo mutationem in massorethica potius quam in alexandrina recensione factam esse suadent. Massorethica enim populos illo ordine exhibet, quo leremias (25,19 sqq.) illis calicem furoris divini propinare iubetur; iam vero Alexandrinos aptum hunc ordinem reliquisse, utei alium substituerent, cuius quae sit ratio non satis apparet, parum est probabile; optime vero intelligitur, massorethicae recensionis redactorem eodem tempore, quo vaticinia e loco suo in finem libri transposuit, eorum ordinem priori vaticinio (25,19 sqq.) adaptasse, ut externum saltem aliquem nexum inter cp. 25. et vaticinia illa indicaret. Confirmationis demum gratia addere liceat, Isaiam quoque et Ezechielem vaticinia sua contra gentes non velut appendicem libris suis addidisse, sed velut partem integrantem inseruisse!ó. Cum massorethica igitur recensione maiores pericopas ab alexandrina omissas recipimus; cum alexandrina ordinem a massorethica perturbatum restituimus; minores discrepantias secundum regulas sanae criticae diiudicandas arbitramur, eandem autem auctoritatem duobus illis testibus competere. Quorum testimonium , si est consentiens, non videmus quo cum iure respui possit!!; immo vero, quoniam alexandrina et massorethica recensio in omnium vaticiniorum substantia consentiunt, egregium nobis praebent argumentum authentiae eorum demonstrandae.
2. Duplici hac tabula, quam diversus sit ordo alexandrinus & massorethico, quocum censentit Vulgata, colligitur.
3. Maiores pericopae, quae in Alex. desiderantur, sunt 33,14-26 (vaticinium de
Vulg.) in textu hebr. plus centies et septuagies legitur, in alex. viz centies est expressa; appositiones ad nomen divinum (Dominus ezercituum, Deus Dominus exercituum, Deus Israei, Dominus Deus etc.), ab alex. fere relinquuntur; nomini personarum hebr. s&epe addit nomen patris, alex. illud omittit, uti etiam omittit titulum nominibus additum (Ieremias propheta, Hananias propheta eto.). Circiter duo millia septingenta vocabula textus hebraicl in alex. versione non esse expressa vulgo dicuntur; recte autem monet Ant. Scholz (Commentar zum Buche des Proph. Jeremias. Würzburg 1880. p. XXXIII) istam assertionem caute esse recipiendam, quoniam tam diversa git lioguarum hebraicae et graecae indoles, ut eiusmodi numeratio vix ac ne vix quidem institui possit.
Protestantes : De Wette Schrader (Einl. p. 431 sqq., Schrader p. 435 ad massorethicam magis inclinat) , Davidson (Introd. I1I. p. 111 sqq., qui ordinem alexandrinum improbat, omissiones alexandrinas approbat), Hitzíg (Der Proph. Jeremia p. XV et passim omissiones longe plerasque approbat). Alii mediam viam ineunt, uti Knabenbauer (Comm. in Ierem..p. 6 sqq.), qui utriusque recensionis lectiones accurate perpendendas censet, ut genuina inveniatur, in ordine tamen Massorethas praefert, et ex acatholicis Naegelsbach (1. c. p. XIX.) ac Smith (The Speaker's Comm. V. p. 323), quorum prior omnes discrepentias arbitrio, alter easdem festinationi graeci interpretis attribuunt, ambo alexandrinum ordinem praeferunt.
5. Negligentiae vel festinationi librariorum (sive hebraicorum sive graecorum) probabiliter adscribi oportet omissionem frequentcm formulae « *! DN23 (ét 6 x5ptoq), appositionum ad nomina Dei vel aliarum personarum, vocabulorum, quae videbantur pleonastice posita (ex. g. 1,31 Tí cv 6c3c; Ral «Ina: As6rjta. Uroxatóutvov, ubi secundum massor. addendum erat : iyó 6g». 2,13 « et foderunt sibi císternas, cisternas dissipatas » pro quibus Alex. x«l óputav Íxvtotq A xxovuc GuvttrQiuiévow), nonnullorum versuum ógotovtieótov (ex. gr. 27,13. 14). Librariorum aut interpretis culpae debetur satis frequens commutatio personarum (ex. gr. 2,25 $ 9b «lxtv. hebr. dixisti; 2,30 ltac0e hebr. sumserunt) aut numcri (ex. gr. 2,18 zorapów hebr. fluminis; 2,19 drootacía hebr. rebelliones; 2,34 atpata hebr. sanguis) aut synonymorum (ex. gr. 2,26 ol vol hebr. domus; 2,31 dxoócats hebr. videtc). Interpreti soli debentur discrepantiae, quae exortae sunt, quia vocabula debitis vocalibus non instruxit (ex. gr. 2,23 nop.
uv, abtzs pro np, velox ; 2,34 nbN, $eX; pro nbus, haec), aut quia sensum non percipiens nec recte vocabula coniungens coniecit potius quam vertit (ex. gr. 3,2 « sedcs Sicuti cornix in deserto »; 31,8 « Iudaei in festo paschatis revertentur », 16,15 « Apis fugit, taurus electus tuus non mansit »). Aliae variae lectiones exortae sunt quia aut librarii aut interpres literas inter se similes permutarunt ( ox. 2,16 TY
Éqvo0dv ct ac si legisset ? DAE ; 2,19 vna, tímor met, 105óxnaa, mmnaj. Ceterum Y similes discrepantiae in omnibus libris leguntur, in nostro tamen sunt longe frequentiores.
Illa in significatione secus inusitatam adhibet ($copióxrc, quod ubique est captivus, in Ier. 24,1 et Bar. 1,9 est claustrarius, 33025), sed etiam de abduclis Suvaxotg loquitur, sicut Ier. de abductis xXovalot;, licet in massorethica recensione de iis non sit sermo, nam on, quod est in Mass., ab Alex. et a Bar. etiam iam est redditum dpyovtt«.
— Item Bar. 2,23 ad verbum fere consonat cum alez. Ierem. 25,10. 11. — Ad 2 Paral. 36,20 quod attinet, auctor testimonio Ieremiae maxime videtur demonstrare durationem exsilii, quae fuerit septuaginta annorum; iam vero massorethicus lerem. 27,7 nihil habet do septuaginta annorum duratione, sed captivitas eiusque septuaginta anni praedicuntur Ier. 25,11. 12 et 29,10, qui versus in utroque textu leguntur.
8. Idque eo magis, quia pericopae ab Alexandrino omissae a Syris semper sint agnitae, a Graecis autem, id quod mulli codices docent, ex Theodotionis versione studiose receptae.
11. Quare non intelligimus, quaenam critica praecepta sequatur Ant. Scholz (Comment. p. XXXIII), qui non tantum omnes omnino pericopas textusque sive breves sive longos, si in alterutra recensione desiderentur, spurios declarat, donec argumentis c.iticis (quibus?) genuini demonstrentur, sed ctiam circiter centum versus, licet utriusque recensionis confirmentur testimonio, pro iunioribus glossis habet, quas utique inspiratas esse admittit.
263. — Quemadmodum Isaiae liber, noster quoque mul'is constat concionibus prophetiisque, quae quadraginta annorum spatio, a 13. anro scilicet Iosiae usque ad 5. mensem anni 11. Sedeciae (626. - 586.) sunt editae, nonnullisque pericopis historicis, quae vaticiniis illustrandis inserviunt; velut appendix autem ei sunt addita historica nonnulla et prophetica, quae quum expugnatione sanctae civitatis sunt recentiora titulo libri non comprehenduntur!. Neque tamen, licet tam variis partibus constet, ei deest uxirAS ARGUMENTI. Integram Ieremiae Prophetiam esse « vastationem », uti integrum Isaiae librum « consolattonem », olim tradiderunt Thalmudistae. Quae quidem non sine aliqua exagge-. ratione sunt asserta, siquidem Ieremias quoque, ne populum suum ad desperationem adduceret, spem melioris sortis futurae ei non ademit, ged continuis poenarum minis accurate definito captivitatis tempore promissiones liberationis et reditus non semel inseruit atque salutem messianicam praeclare descripsit?. Recte tamen Ieremias, praeserüm si cum Isaia veteris oeconomiae evangelista et divinarum misericordiarum praecone comparatur, propheta iustitiae divinae appellatur. Etenim ut « iudicia divina loqueretur cum populo suo super omnem eius malitiam » (1,1&) est missus et « constitutus super gentes et regna, ut evelleret et destrueret et dissiparet et disperderet, et aedificare et plantaret » (1,10) ; qua in muneris descriptione iustitia Dei vindicativa quum quatuor vocabulis, divina misericordia duobus tantum designatur, mirum non est, quod priorem in eius libro longe praevalere videmus. Revera zustitia divina omnium vaticiniorum eius est quasi À et Q., principium et finis. Illo enim in tempore positus, quo regnum Iuda mensuram peccatorum suorum impleverat neque amplius sincera conversione ad Deum suum revertere voluit, totus in eo est, ut populum electum atque tot tantisque beneficiis à Deo cumulatum summa sua et inaudita ingratitudine , continuo suo longanimitatis divinae abusu, pervicacissima sua, quae minoribus frangi non potuerat, contumacia ultimam cladem, regni urbis templi excidium, sibi ipsum altraxisse demonstret. Sicut igitur Isaiae multiplicia vaticinia idea divinae misericordiae, ita divinae iustitiae idea Ieremiae conciones et vaticinia et narrationes regit atque ad unitatem redigit.
Quam unitatem argumenti confirmat integri LiBRI ORDO aptaque partium eius dispositio. Secundum enim rationem temporis, quo singuli sunt habiti, prophetam sermones suos non disposuisse , eorum inscriptiones chronologicae celare docent?, sed pro eorum argumento ita eos connexuit, ut iusta fuisse ultima Domini iudicia contra regnum foedifragum clarius demonstraret. Ad chronologicum, ut videtur, ordinem maxime attendentes non pauci interpretes ullum ordinem sive in alexandrina sive in massorethica recensione reperiri negarunt*. At si ad finem, quem sibi proposuerat propheta, attentionem nostram converterimus, in alexandrina recensione, cuius ordinem praeferendum
DE ARGUMENTO ET ORDINE PROPHETIAE IEREMIAE. 318 esse diximus (262)*, aptam vaticiniorum omnium distributionem satis facile, opinor, deprehendemus*. Namque si appendicem, quae titulo non comprehenditur (40.-45. 52.), seposuerimus, integer liber in tres partes, quae ad eundem finem collineant, sua quasi sponte dispertitur. Post exordium enim, quo prophetae vocatio et missio describitur summumque operis argumentum indicatur (1,1-3,5) primae partis conciones (3,6-24,10), quae pleraeque losiae tempore videntur esse habitae, omnes eo tendunt, ut iudicium, quo Deus regnum Iuda destruendum decreverat, iustissimum esse doceant atque ineluctabile, quoniam po- ;pulus emendari nolit. Alterius partis (25,1-13;56-51;25,15-38) vaticinia, quae pleraque a. 4. loakim edita esse recte dicuntur, quum exteris gentibus eandem, immo maiorem, quam regno luda, poenam annuntient, iterum Dei iustitiae demonstrandae inserviunt; quem eorum finem non obscure indicatum videmus in Dei ipsius interrogatione : « Ecce in civitate, in qua invocatum est nomen meum, ego incipiam affligere, et vos quasi innocentes et immunes eritis » (25,29)? Ne quis vero putet, adveniente poena et primis cladibus regnum Iuda ad poenitentiam conversam iustam iram divinam placare et avertere voluisse, terttae partis (2&,1-38,28) conciones et narrationes ostendunt, usque &d ultimum obsidionis momentum Iudaeos in sua contumacia perseverasse atque tantum abfuisse, ut divinis monitis ad poenitentiam adduci se sivissent, ut prophetam ipsum persequerentur, ad mortem quaererent, in carcerem iniicerent. « Mansit Ieremias in vestibulo carceris usque ad diem, quo capta est lerusalem » ; his verbis tertiam partem terminans diserte ostendit propheta, divinam iustitiam populum, qui omnia salutis media pertinaci et offirmato animo respuit, non punire non potuisse. Ep?/ogus historicus (39,1-18) urbis expugnatione et Ieremiae liberatione breviter narrata confirmat praecedentia vaticinia?. Eidem autem fini appendiz quoque, quam terminato libro Ieremias adiecit (40.-45. 52.), inservire videtur; Iudaeorum enim, quos Chaldaei in Palaestina reliquerant, continuatam inobedientiam erga Dei mandata renovatamque idololatriam narrans /ongum exsilium omnino necessarium fuisse demonstrat, ut populus emendaretur et ad magnificas illas, quas propheta non celaverat, benedictiones messianicas accipiendas praepararetur. Ex analysi, quam subiicimus, argumenti haec unitas clarius elucebit.
1. Titulus libri promittit vaticinia, quae Ieremias aecepit « in diebus Iosiae, a 13. anno regni eius, et in diebus Ioakim usque ad finem anni 11. Sedeciae », qui annus completus quidem non fuit, sed terminabatur destructione regni et « transmigratione lerusalem in mense quinto ». Hinc omnia, quae habentur in cpp. 40.-44. atque ultima parte cp. 52., quum post mensem quintum a. 11. Sedeciae sint gesta, pro appendice sunt habenda. Ioachaz et Iechonias, quia ternis tantum mensibus regnabant, in inscriptione sunt praetermissi; Iechoniae tamen tempori attribuendum est 22,24 sqq.
3.6 « In diebus Iosiae »; 344 Tempore Sedeciae; obsidionis initio;
91,1 Tempore Sedeciae (uno ex ultimis annis); 354 « In diebus Joukim »; 29,1 « Post translationem Iechoniae »; 36,1 « Anno 4. loakim »; 95,4 « Anno 4. Joakém »; . 1 31,1 Sedeciae ct obsidionis tempore ; 96, « In principio regni Joakim »; 384 Eodem tempore; 91, « In priacipio regni Ioakim » (lege Sedeciae | 39,4 Anno 11. Sedeciae, cfr 361 n. 4 p. 367); 40,4 Post translationem popull in Chaldaean; 28,1 « Anno 4, Sedeciae »; 45,1 « Anno 4. Joakim »; 29,2 Post translationem Zechoniae; 463 Anno &. loakim; 32,4 « Anno 10. Sedeciae; 49,35 « In principio regni Sedeciae »;
33,1 Tempore Sedeciae, versus obsidionis ünem; | 53,34 « Anno31. tranamigrationis Iechoniae ».
6. Alexandrinam recensionem secutus Amt. Scholz (Comm. z. B. d. Proph. Jeremias p. XXVI sqq.) divisionem libri proponit in sex partes, quae denis concionibus vel narrationibus constent (I. cpp. 1.-10.; II. cpp. 21.-20.; III. cpp. 21.-24.; IV. 25,1.-.14 et cpp. 46.-51.; V. 25,15-33,26; VI. cpp. 34.-44.; Appendices duae cp. 45. et cp. 52.). Quae distributio parum nobis probatur, quoniam non apparet, quonam interno vinculo denae singularum partium sectiones colligentur, et conciones non paucae, ut denarius numerus officiatur, in particulas discerpuntur; factitia igitur videtur esse divisio neque ex argumento aut fine operis nata sed extrinsecus ingesta. — Artificiosior quoque est divisio, quam proposuit B. Neteler (Gliederung des B. Jeremias. Münster 1870.). Opus enim distribuit in quatuor partes (1.-24.;-25,1-14; 46.-51.; 25,15-38;, -26.-34.; - 35.-44.), quibus velut quinta pars accedunt 45. 52., Baruch, Threni, epistola Ieremiae. Singulas deinde partes in quatuor sectiones distribui statuit, singulas vero sectiones tribus membris constare. Internum tamen etiam invenire vult nexum, ita ut tría iudicia in prima sectione partis primae annuntiata fusius ex ordine explicentur quum in tribus reliquis sectionibus partis primae tum in tribus aliis partibus; secunda igitur sectio partis primae (7.-12.) respondeat secundae parti (25. et 46.-51.), tertia sectio (13.-17.) terliae parti (26.-34.) etc. Num iste nexus, quem equidem non deprehendo, revera adsit, diiudicent doctiores.
T. Ieremias, qui praedecessorum suorum opera frequenter adhibuit, Isaiae priorem partem imítatus esse videtur. Nam sicut Isaias vaticinia sua de duabus Assyriorum expeditionibus ab invicem separavit vaticiniis suls contra gentes insertis prioremque partem historica narratione confirmavit, ita Ieremias quoque vaticinia 8ua imminente periculo pronuntiata vaticiniis contra gentes insertis ab aliis separavit, quae praesente periculo protulit, eaque etiam addita narratione confirmavit. Quoniam vero pauciora habet vaticinia messianica, in exordio leviter tantum illa indicat, dum Isaias in secunda exordii sui parte fusius, uti decuit, de regno messianico agit, quippe quod in libro eius longe maiorem locum occupet.
Exonbiux (1,4 -3,5) praeter libri inscriptionem (1,1-3) exhibet — — 1. vocationem et missionem prophetae, qua muneris eius indoles adumbratur (1,4- 19).
8.) Prophetam, quem ab utero sibi praeparavit, Deus vocat reluctantemque confortat, ut munus suscipiat (1,4- 8), quod maxime quidem est ad denuntiandam populi stragem , sed etiam ad eum consolandum (4,9. 10).
b.) Duobus symbolis missionis indolem ei manifestat. Amygdala (« virga vigilans ») significat Dominum cito sententiam suam exsecutioni esse mandaturum (1,11. 12); olla ebulliens ab aquilone explicat, quae sit sententia exsecutioni mandanda : sc. punitio populi per gentes septeintrionales (1,13-16).
c.) Demum prophetam edocet, quae, ad quos, quomodo debeat concionari (1,17- 19).
2. Argumentum libri : populum poena dignum esse et Deum eum esse puniturum (2,1 -3,5).
a.) Dei amore beneficiisque spretis populus Dominum suum reliquit et idola secutus est (2,1-9).
b.) Quod crimen apud gentes inauditum, quae deos suos non relinc.) Profecto inde ab antiquis temporibus semper et ubique populus secutus est idola (2,20- 25), quamvis ei auxilio non essent (2, 26 - 29).
d.) Quare contra Deum, qui omni ratione eum ad se attrahere studuit, populus conqueri non potest, si nunc punietur (2,30-37). Sicut mulier a viro dimissa, si cum altero fuerit, a priore resumi nequit, ita populus, quum sincere converti nolit, a Deo relinquetur (3,1-5).
Pans PnnxA (3,6-24,10) docet regni Juda reprobationem esse iustam et ineluctabilem propter eius crimina et contumaciam. 1. Prima concio (3,6-6,30) ineluctabilem esse poenam denuntiat, quia populus converti nolit".
a.) Comparat propheta sortem Israelis cum sorte luda, ut Iuda ad pocnitentiam sinceram incitet (3,6- 4,9).
a.) [sraelis a Deo reiecti sorte Iuda non est eruditus, sed eadem peccata committens et simulate tantum se convertens peior est, quam Israel (3,6 -11);
B.) Israel enim a Deo ad poenitentiam invitatus et futurae felicitatis messianicae recordatus (3,12-920) aliquando sincere ad Deum revertetur et ab eo recipietur (4,1. 2).
b.) Imminentem poenam proponit, ut luda ad sinceram conversionem invitet (4,3- 31).
«.) Quoniam Iuda sincere converti non vult, exardescit ira Dei (4, 3. 4); advenit ab aquilone poena tam terribilis, ut omnes perterreat : reges, principes, sacerdotes, prophetas, ipsum Ieremiam (4,8 -10);
B.) Sicut ventus urens advenit propter peccata Ierusalem; omnes civitates obsidentur (4,11-18); quae videns propheta in gemitus prorumpit (4,19 - 22);
1-) tola terra devastabitur, nec poterit artibus suis urbs meretrix calamitatem avertere (4,93-31).
c.) At quia vanae sunt hae invitationes, Deus populum punire debet (8,1-31).
«.) Frustra Deus quaerit iustos, ut lIerosolymis parcere possit; a maximo ad minimum perverterunt vias suas (3,1 -9);
B.) sicut Israel, ita Iuda despexit verba Dei, quae per prophetas locutus est, ideo factis debet Dominus confirmare verba prophetarum (5,10-19);
Cornelius a Lapide
Argument 129 paragraphs
Jeremiah, says St. Jerome in chapter 1, he, with captivity imminent, is sent by God's clemency to the people, that he might stir them to repentance, and thus he himself might escape the Babylonian captivity now at hand. At the same time Ezekiel prophesied: but Jeremiah, as it were a pillar of the falling city and kingdom, as appears in chapter 1, verse 18, prophesied before in Judah, Ezekiel after Jeremiah, in the 35th year, captured in Babylon, uttered prophecies.
Question I: In what year did Jeremiah begin to prophesy, and in what year did he cease?
Question I. You will ask first, in what year did Jeremiah begin to prophesy, and in what year did he cease? I answer first, from chapter 1, 2, it is clear that he began in the 13th year of King Josiah, when he was still a boy, as St. Jerome and others say, and this is clear from chapter 1, 7. He therefore began to prophesy being about 14 or 15 years old, when the Medes, according to Eusebius, were ruled by Phraortes, the Romans by Ancus Martius, the Egyptians by Psammetichus the Elder, in the 36th Olympiad, in the year of the world 3318; for into this year of the world fell the 13th year of Josiah, which was the year 632 before the birth of Christ. From this it follows that Jeremiah began to prophesy 165 years after Isaiah; 34 years before Ezekiel (who began in the 5th year of the transmigration of Jehoiachin, Ezekiel 1, 2); 54 years before Daniel (who began in the 5th year from the destruction of Jerusalem).
Second, Jeremiah prophesied under five kings, namely under Josiah for 19 years, under Jehoahaz son of Josiah for three months: under Jehoiakim brother of Jehoahaz, and son of Josiah, for 11 years, under Jehoiachin son of Jehoiakim for three months: under Zedekiah brother of Jehoahaz and son of Josiah for 11 years, until the 5th month of that eleventh year, in which Jerusalem was captured by the Chaldeans, in which also Jeremiah was captured, but was treated generously by Nebuchadnezzar; because he had foretold his victory against the Jews, and had persuaded them to surrender to him, chapter xxxix, 11. He therefore prophesied for 41 years in Judah: in which, destroyed by the Chaldeans, he remained, that he might be a consolation to the remnant of the people.
Third, from Judah, fleeing with the Jews from the Chaldeans against the command of the Lord into Egypt, Jeremiah was carried away by them, and there in Taphnis (a royal city, where Moses performed miracles before Pharaoh) he prophesied, as appears in chapter XLIII and XLIV, for 4 years, namely until the 4th year of the captivity and destruction of Jerusalem, which was the 23rd of Nebuchadnezzar, in which Jeremiah foretold that Pharaoh, who was called Ephree, or Vaphre, king of Egypt, would be conquered and killed by Nebuchadnezzar, which happened in the following year, according to Josephus, X Antiq. xi. Wherefore universally Jeremiah prophesied for 45 years, and since he began as a boy of about 15 years, it follows that he was killed at about sixty years of age, in the year of the world 3363.
Fourth, when in Taphnis Jeremiah threatened disaster to his Hebrews and all Egypt, which soon came to pass through Nebuchadnezzar, he was overwhelmed with stones by his fellow citizens and died a martyr. Thus St. Jerome, Tertullian, Dorotheus, Epiphanius, On the Lives of the Prophets; Isidore, On the Life and Death of the Saints. Therefore R. Solomon errs, from chapter xxiv, 28, in thinking that Jeremiah with Baruch returned from Egypt to Judah.
Dorotheus, Epiphanius and Isidore add, with whom credibility rests, that Jeremiah was buried in Taphnis, and his tomb was held in great honor by the Egyptians: because he himself by his prayers had driven out from there asps, crocodiles and monstrous beasts, and would drive them out daily with dust taken from his tomb. Moreover, John Moschus in the Spiritual Meadow, chapter LXXVII, relates that the bones of Jeremiah were transferred from there by Alexander the Great to Alexandria, a city founded by him, and there were venerated in the Tetrapylon.
The ancient Alexandrian Chronicle adds, but recently published by our Rader, that Alexander erected an illustrious monument to Jeremiah's ashes: just as Nicephorus, book VIII, chapter xxx, relates that a tomb was erected for him by St. Helena, mother of Constantine.
Finally, Dorotheus and Epiphanius add that Jeremiah in Egypt foretold to the Egyptian priests that all their idols would fall, when the Virgin Mother would enter Egypt with her infant, and this happened thus, when the Mother of God leading the boy Jesus entered Egypt; of which more in chapter XLIV, at the end. Jeremiah is inscribed in the catalogue of Saints in the Martyrology
on the 4th of May. For thus on that day we read in the Roman Martyrology: "In Egypt of St. Jeremiah the Prophet, who was overwhelmed with stones by the people, and died at Taphnis, and was buried there: at whose tomb the faithful (as St. Epiphanius relates) were accustomed to pray, and taking dust from there, they heal the bites of asps."
Question II: Who and what manner of man was Jeremiah?
I answer first, he was the son of Hilkiah: whether that celebrated High Priest under Josiah, I shall say in chapter 1, 1. He was descended from Anathoth, which was a city in the tribe of Benjamin, three miles distant from Jerusalem, and was assigned to the priests, as appears in Joshua XXI, 18.
Second, Jeremiah was sanctified and consecrated as a Prophet in his mother's womb, as is evident from chapter 1, verse 5; hence throughout his entire life he remained a virgin, as testified by St. Ignatius, in his epistle to the Philadelphians, and by Isidore, On the Life and Death of the Prophets, chapter thirty-eight, and this is sufficiently clear from chapter 16, verse 2, although the Chaldean Interpreter, chapter 37, verse 12, thinks that he had children. For this reason St. Jerome, in the prologue to Jeremiah, speaks of him thus: "Dedicating to the Church of Christ an evangelical man through his virginity." The same author, in book 1 Against Jovinian, attributes to the merit of virginity that, when all were led into Babylon and all others, even the temple, were equally destroyed, Jeremiah alone was not only preserved but was rewarded with the spoils of the victors. And "when Nebuchadnezzar," he says, "did not command Nabuzardan concerning the Holy of Holies, he nevertheless commanded concerning the preservation of Jeremiah." Again, Jeremiah was free from all sin throughout his entire life, says St. Athanasius, sermon 4 Against the Arians. Sin is a mortal crime, not a venial one.
Third, Jeremiah was a priest, teacher, prophet and apostle sent immediately by God, who surpassed all the Prophets in humanity and compassion toward his neighbour, and, as Nazianzen says, oration 17 to the Citizens of Nazianzus, at the beginning, "He was the most inclined of all the Prophets to compassion." For he alone, relying solely on God, in the greatest disturbance of the commonwealth, in the siege and destruction of the city, most ardently procured the salvation of his brethren, like another Paul, and did the same after his death, II Maccabees 15, 14, where Onias said to Judas Maccabeus: "This is he that prayeth much for the people, and for all the holy city, Jeremiah the prophet of God."
He was also an illustrious hagiographic writer: for he wrote or dictated many things, namely this prophecy, also the Lamentations, the book of Baruch, and the books III and IV of Kings. For Procopius of Gaza, Isidore and Moses Kimchi, whom Sixtus Senensis cites in book 1, teach that Jeremiah collected these from public diaries and chronicles up to the destruction of Jerusalem. This is confirmed by the fact that the last chapter of Jeremiah is also the last of the book IV of Kings. Abulensis hears in the book of Judges, chapter 17, verse 4, that Jeremiah also composed the first two books of Kings.
Others add that Psalm 64: "A hymn becometh thee," and Psalm 136: "Upon the rivers of Babylon," were written by Jeremiah, and many other things, which Sixtus Senensis gathers in book II of the Bibliography, under the word Jeremiah, and by Castro here. In the Vatican library, I saw the Paralipomena of Jeremiah in the Greek language, in which were the letters of Baruch and Abdemelech the Ethiopian to Jeremiah, and conversely the responsive letters of Jeremiah to them. But since the ancients made no mention of these, nor does the Vatican codex cite Epiphanius, Dorotheus, or any of the ancients who transmitted or approved these Paralipomena to posterity; therefore I preferred to omit them, rather than to mix uncertain things with certain ones.
Finally, it is evident that Jeremiah wrote many more things which were lost through the injury of time, from the Descriptions of Jeremiah, which are cited in II Maccabees, chapter 2, verse 1, and are now found nowhere.
Fourth, Jeremiah threatened the rebellious Jews with the destruction of the city, and therefore suffered most dreadful things from them, namely reproaches, blows, beatings, hunger, imprisonment; he was often proclaimed guilty of death by the whole people, and finally was killed with constancy; thus he was the most express type of Christ afflicted and crucified by the Jews; hence concerning him, just as concerning Christ, the Jews say, chapter 11, verse 19: "Let us put wood in his bread, and cut him off from the land of the living." Hence Jeremiah is aptly called in Hebrew ירמיהו Iirmiahu, that is, the Most High, or the sublimity of the Lord, says Jerome, or one who exalts the Lord, from the root רום rum, that is, high. Again, Jeremiah is the same as the casting forth of the Lord, if you derive this name from the root רמה rama, that is, he cast forth, and מ'יה mi'ia, which is an abbreviation of Iehova, that is, the Lord: for Jeremiah was (as Isidore of Pelusium, disciple of St. Chrysostom, says in book 1, epistle 298), πολυπαθέστατος, that is, most afflicted, and in the greatest and longest calamity he showed great constancy and elevation of mind, and by his example taught us that saying of Antony in the Melissa, part II, sermon 89: "When you are beaten, stand firm like an anvil; it is the part of a noble athlete to be beaten and to conquer, but especially all things must be endured by us for God's sake, so that he himself may endure us." Ecclesiasticus adds in chapter 49, verse 8, that Jerusalem was burned by the Chaldeans on account of the ill treatment of Jeremiah: "They burned," it says, "the chosen city of holiness and made desolate the ways thereof in the hand of Jeremiah. For they dealt ill with him, who was consecrated from the womb to be a Prophet, to destroy, and to pluck up,
and to destroy, and to build again, and to renew."
Fifth, Jeremiah, as I have said, was a martyr. Whence Tertullian in the Scorpiace, chapter viii: "Jeremiah," he says, "is stoned, Isaiah is sawn asunder, Zacharias is slain between the temple and the altar, assigning the perpetual stains of his blood to stones, and certainly those who were moved by the Spirit were directed by him himself into martyrdoms, while suffering what they had also foretold." Whence that passage in Hebrews xi, 37: "They were stoned," many interpreters refer to Jeremiah. Deservedly therefore Jeremiah, having departed and existing in limbo, appeared to Judas Maccabaeus, "surrounded with admirable age and glory, and great dignity of appearance," II Maccabees xv, 13.
Sixth, Victorinus the Martyr held that Jeremiah lives in paradise, and will come with Elijah, so that he may prophesy and oppose himself to the Antichrist: whose opinion St. Hilary also mentions, Canon XX in Matthew. They prove this from chapter i, 15. But the sense of that passage is different, as I shall say there; for from what has been said it is clear that Jeremiah did not live, but was slain in Taphnis.
Question III: What is the subject matter of Jeremiah?
I answer, first, he partly predicts future things, especially the coming of Nebuchadnezzar, the destruction of the city and of other nations; partly he exhorts to repentance and amendment of life; partly he rebukes sins, especially idolatry; he threatens, and often laments, and is wholly pathetic. Second, he consoles his people, and predicts that after 70 years they will be freed from captivity. Third, he narrates in order the deeds of his time, both of kings, and of the people, and his own words and deeds. Fourth, he prophesies concerning the Church of Christ, the calling of the Gentiles, the grace and happiness of the New Testament. The same subject matter is treated by Ezekiel and Obadiah. Whence a great part of Obadiah is contained in Jeremiah, says St. Jerome in Obadiah, near the end.
Second, Jeremiah dictated these things by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit; but he wrote them, with Baruch his scribe dictating, as is evident from chapter xxxvi, verse 4, who also collected the prophecies of Jeremiah, published at different times, into this volume, neglecting however the order, whence he often postpones the earlier ones: for which reason the order here in Jeremiah is often preposterous and confused, see Canon II.
Add also that the final chapter was added by Baruch from the last chapter of the fourth book of Kings. This is also the reason why the Septuagint sometimes changed the order of chapters which is in the Hebrew and Latin, so that chapter xxiii in ours is xxxvi in the Septuagint: in the Septuagint chapter xxx is our xxxvii; in the Septuagint chapter xxviii is our xxxi, in the Septuagint, etc.
Third, as to style, Jeremiah "appears as simple and easy in words as he is profoundly majestic in the meaning of his thoughts," says St. Jerome in the Preface to the sixth book of his Commentary on Jeremiah: and in the Hebrew manner, through various similitudes and parables he sets things before the eyes, as Christ also does. His Hebrew idiom is pure, and not mixed with Chaldaism. For Jeremiah wrote before the Babylonian captivity, and consequently before the corruption of the Hebrew language, which took place in Babylon: for there the captive Jews began to speak Chaldean with the Chaldeans.
I, in my manner in the explanation of Jeremiah, have had two things especially before my eyes, truth and brevity: I know that I have followed the former, the latter I have achieved.
The Hebrews relate that Jeremiah prophesied together with Zephaniah and Huldah: but Jeremiah in the streets and squares, Zephaniah in the synagogues, Huldah in the assembly of women. Ribera laughs at this. For it sounds like a Rabbinic fable: for such things are wont to be the keen observations and commentaries of the Rabbis.
and so pleasant.
St. Ambrose, and from him St. Augustine, book II On Christian Doctrine, chapter xxviii, assert that Plato was in Egypt in the time of Jeremiah, and learned from him what he wrote: "Did not," he says, "the aforementioned Bishop (Ambrose), having considered the history of the nations, when he found that Plato had journeyed to Egypt in the time of Jeremiah, where that Prophet was then, show it to be more probable that Plato was rather imbued with our letters through Jeremiah, so that he could teach or write those things which are justly praised?" Wherefore Genebrardus in the Chronology, and from him Antonius Fernandius, book On the Visions of Holy Scripture, vision 11, in the Preface: "Jeremiah," they say, "laid the foundations of philosophy in Taphnis, imbuing the Hierophants with secret wisdom. The Greeks, stirred by his fame, undertook journeys to Egypt, and after about seventy years derived philosophy into Greece." Which things are to be received with a grain of salt: for, as concerning Thales, who flourished under Cyrus, let us grant that he could have been able as a young man to see and hear Jeremiah in Egypt; certainly Plato, who was two hundred years later than Jeremiah (for he lived in the time of Alexander the Great), could not have seen and heard him: yet he journeyed to Egypt, so that he might learn the wisdom which the Egyptians had drawn from Jeremiah and the Hebrews. Wherefore St. Augustine thus candidly retracts his statement, book I of Retractions, chapter iv: "In that," he says, "which I said about the history of times, as if Plato and Jeremiah had been contemporaries, my memory deceived me."
St. Jerome wrote a commentary on Jeremiah up to chapter 32. Some have doubted whether this commentary is by St. Jerome, because it does not reflect his vigor and genius. But Rabanus, Cassiodorus, Marianus, Trithemius, Sixtus Senensis, the Louvain Censors and others everywhere attribute it to St. Jerome. Indeed, Rabanus himself confesses that he drew his Commentary on Jeremiah up to chapter 32 from this Commentary of St. Jerome, with many additions from his own work, and from Origen and St. Gregory. Wherefore the Commentary of Rabanus is not the same as the Commentary of St. Jerome, but is drawn from it, and is more extensive, as is evident to anyone comparing both. Moreover, it is not surprising that St. Jerome is less sharp here; for he was worn out by
illnesses, labors and age; for this was his final work on the Prophets, as he himself confesses in the Preface, when he begins thus: "After the explanation of the twelve Prophets, and of Isaiah, Daniel and Ezekiel, we finally turn our hand to Jeremiah." Add that this commentary of his is shorter than the others, and incomplete: for it ends at chapter 32.
Moreover, Theodoret, Rupertus, St. Thomas, Hugo, Lyranus, Dionysius, Vatablus, and Andreas Capella wrote on the whole of Jeremiah; and most recently and most carefully Christopher a Castro, John Maldonatus and Gaspar Sanchez, all of our Society.
Origen wrote fourteen homilies on the sentences of Jeremiah, which are extant in volume I of Origen, which St. Jerome translated into Latin. He also wrote
A Chronological Arrangement of the Oracles, or the Order of the Chapters and Deeds of Jeremiah
Because the order of chapters and oracles in Jeremiah is greatly disturbed, as I have said, I shall therefore arrange them in their proper order, and distribute them serially into four parts. I shall follow Abulensis at the end of book IV of Kings, Torniellus, and especially Christopher a Castro, who has an exact chronological arrangement in his Preface.
The first part therefore comprises those things which Jeremiah prophesied under King Josiah, in which he censures the idolatry and vices of the people, and threatens destruction by the Chaldeans. This begins at chapter 1, and extends to chapter 17, exclusive, except chapter 10, which pertains to Zedekiah, and chapter 13, which pertains to Joiakim, and from verse 18, to the times of Zedekiah, as I shall shortly say.
The second part is of those things which he prophesied under Joiakim son of Josiah, and Jehoiachin, or Jechoniah son of Joiakim: after Josiah died and Shallum son of Josiah was removed, while the funeral lamentation was still continuing, Jeremiah is sent to Joiakim, and admonishes him not to weep for Josiah, but rather for Shallum who will not return from Egypt, and for himself, because he is to be buried with the burial of an ass. Therefore chapter 22, from verse 1 to verse 24, pertains to this, as is evident from verse 10 there.
At the same time, prophesying in the court of the temple concerning the destruction of the city and temple, he is seized and tried for death; but he is freed by Ahikam, as is narrated in chapter 26: therefore chapter 26 is to be placed here.
At the same time, he is commanded to take chains, which are later to be sent under Zedekiah to neighboring nations, as is evident from chapter 27, verses 1 to 4.
At the same time, he prophesies those things which are contained in chapter 17, namely that the sin of Judah is indelible, because trusting in the aid of Egypt, it would not subject itself to the Babylonian who was already preparing for war.
In the 4th year of Joiakim he prophesies those things which are contained in chapter 25, concerning the cup, that is the active calamity of the Chaldeans, and that nations will serve them for 70 years.
In the same year occurred those things which are said in chapter 46, from verse 2 to 12, concerning Pharaoh Necho being defeated, and shortly after being slain by Nebuchadnezzar near Carchemish, and on that occasion he soon proceeds to prophesy that Egypt is to be subjugated by Nebuchadnezzar, there, from verse 3 to the end of the chapter.
In the same year occurred those things which are said in chapter 36, concerning the oracles and threats of Jeremiah being written, and being read by Baruch to the people from the book which Joiakim burned, but Jeremiah restored, and those things which are said in chapter 45 concerning Baruch being afraid and comforted by God.
Around the 7th year of Joiakim occurred those things which are narrated in chapter 35, concerning the Rechabites, and those things which are said in chapter 13, from verse 1 to 18, concerning the linen girdle, which he took to the Euphrates, and concerning the broken flask as a sign of future calamity.
Soon followed the words spoken under Jehoiachin, or Jechoniah son of Joiakim. Namely, chapter 22, from verse 24 to the end, he prophesies that Jechoniah is to be led into Babylon, and will never return from there.
Chapter 23, he inveighs against the negligence of kings, in that this was the cause of the destruction and captivity of the people, and promises a new form of the commonwealth through Christ and the Apostles.
The third part contains the oracles spoken under Zedekiah, who succeeded Jechoniah, up to and including the destruction of the city:
In the 1st year of Zedekiah were spoken those things which are contained in chapter 24, concerning the two baskets of figs, which signified the good fortune of Jechoniah and the others who were carried away; but the miserable fortune of Zedekiah and the others remaining in Jerusalem, and rebelling against the Chaldeans.
And those things which are written in chapter 29 to Jechoniah and the others in Babylon, that they are to remain there for 70 years.
And those things which chapter 30 and 31 predict concerning the captivity being released, both temporal through Cyrus, and spiritual through Christ.
And those things which are contained in chapter 18 concerning the potter, after whose manner God is able to form and reform the people, and restore it to freedom.
And the epistle which is contained in chapter 10 by which he admonishes those carried away not to worship the signs of heaven and the idols of the Chaldeans.
which are found in chapter XXVII, 3, up to the end, concerning chains sent to neighboring kings; and which are found in chapter XXVIII concerning their breaking by Hananiah, and their exchange for iron ones.
At the same time, those things which he prophesies in chapters XLVIII and XLIX against neighboring kings and nations seem to be spoken, namely against Moab, Ammon, Idumaea, Damascus, Cedar and Elam.
Chapter XIX, he broke a small vessel in the court of the temple, to show that the people would thus be broken.
Chapter XX, imprisoned by Pashhur, he threatens him with destruction; and from weariness of life and the bitterness of afflictions, he curses the day of his birth.
Soon in chapters L and LI, he prophesies the destruction of Babylon through Cyrus and Darius: for that this happened in the fourth year of Zedekiah is evident from Jeremiah LI, 59.
Chapter XIII, 18, Jeremiah is sent to Zedekiah the king reigning under Nebuchadnezzar, and to the queen, to predict to them the overthrow of the kingdom. This is evident from IV Kings XXIV, 20, and chapter XV, 1, and from Josephus, book X of Antiquities, chapter X.
Chapter XXXIV, Jerusalem now besieged, when the Jews had renewed their covenant with God (and therefore the Chaldeans had withdrawn to fight against the Egyptians), but soon violated it, he predicts the return of the Chaldeans.
Chapter XXXVII, he signifies the same to Zedekiah; and when he seemed to go out to Anathoth, he was seized by Jeriah, thrust into prison.
Chapter XLVII, he prophesies the Palestinians to be laid waste by the Chaldeans: for that this happened in the ninth year of Zedekiah will be evident from chapter XLVII, 1.
Nebuchadnezzar invaded and occupied Coele-Syria, the Ammonites, the Moabites, and other nations, as Jeremiah had predicted. Thus Josephus, book X of Antiquities, XI.
Chapter XXI, when Nebuchadnezzar had returned to the siege of Jerusalem, Zedekiah sending to him to pray for the withdrawal of the enemy, Jeremiah answered that he would not withdraw, but if he wished to be safe, he should surrender to him.
Chapter XXXII, Jeremiah in prison is ordered to buy the field of his cousin, so that by this he might signify that the captives would return from Babylon to their fields.
Chapter XXXIII, he promises happiness after the time of captivity.
Chapter XXXVIII, he is cast into a pit, when he was predicting salvation to those deserting to the Chaldeans, and destruction to those remaining, but drawn out by Abdemelech and having spoken with the king, he remained in the vestibule of the prison.
Chapter XXXIX, from verse 15 to the end, he promises Abdemelech safety in the destruction of the city.
Soon in chapter XXXIX, from verse 1 to verse 15, Jerusalem is captured, Zedekiah is blinded, his sons and princes are killed.
Fourth Part: After the Destruction of Jerusalem
Chapter XL, Nebuzaradan commends Jeremiah to Gedaliah, whom Nebuchadnezzar had appointed governor of Judaea.
The book now seems to have been written by Jeremiah as a letter concerning not worshipping idols, which is found in chapter VI of Baruch.
The city having been destroyed, he seems to have composed the Lamentations.
Chapter XLI, Ishmael in the seventh month kills Gedaliah; and Johanan brings back and gathers the remnants of the people, and thinks of flight into Egypt.
Chapter XLII, the princes consult Jeremiah, he forbids flight, and says if they flee into Egypt, they will be laid waste there by Nebuchadnezzar.
Chapter XLIII, the princes not believing Jeremiah, and forcing Jeremiah and all the Jews to flee with them into Egypt, they arrive in Tahpanhes, where Jeremiah prophesies the destruction of Egypt through the Chaldeans.
Chapter XLIV, to the Jews in Egypt, and to Pharaoh Hophra he threatens captivity: whence for this reason he seems to have been stoned by the Jews shortly after before the destruction of Egypt: for here his prophecy ends, and thereafter no mention is made of Jeremiah.
In the same year he occupied Egypt, killed Pharaoh Hophra, appointed Amasis as king, and led 743 Jews captive to Babylon, as is evident from Jeremiah LII, 30, and from Josephus. Among them was led Baruch; for Jeremiah was already dead. Thus from Castro and others. But it seems more true that Egypt was subdued by Nebuchadnezzar after 12 years, namely in the 35th year of his reign, as I shall say on Ezekiel XXIX, 17.
In the sixth year, which was the fifth of the destruction of Jerusalem, and the 26th of Nebuchadnezzar, on the 17th day of the fifth month, Baruch read the book written by him in Babylon before Jeconiah, and all the people, Baruch 1.
I. God says to Jeremiah, chapter I, 5: "Before I formed thee in the womb, I knew thee: and before thou camest forth out of the womb, I sanctified thee."
In How Many and What Things Jeremiah Was a Type or Prophet of Christ
Thus of Christ St. Matthew says, chapter I, 18: "(The Blessed Mary, mother of Jesus) was found to have in the womb of the Holy Ghost." And the Angel, verse 20: "For that which is conceived in her, is of the Holy Ghost." Likewise the Angel, Luke chapter I, 35: "And therefore also the Holy One that shall be born of thee, shall be called the Son of God." Finally Isaiah, chapter XLIX, 1, says of Christ: "The Lord hath called me from the womb, from the bowels of my mother he hath been mindful of my name."
II. God says to Jeremiah, chapter I, 5: "I have made thee a prophet unto the nations;" and verse 9: "Behold I have put my words in thy mouth: behold I have set thee this day over the nations, and over the kingdoms, to root up, and to pull down, and to waste, and to destroy, and to build, and to plant."
Thus concerning Christ Isaiah says, chapter LI, 16: "I have put my words in thy mouth... that thou mayest plant the heavens, and found the earth, and say to Sion: Thou art my people;" and David, Psalm II, 6: "But I am appointed king by him over Sion his holy mountain, preaching his commandment;" and verse 8: "Ask of me, and I will give thee the Gentiles for thy inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession." Isaiah, chapter XLIX, 6: "Behold, I have given thee to be a light of the Gentiles, that thou mayest be my salvation even to the farthest part of the earth."
III. God says to Jeremiah, chapter I, 18: "Be not afraid: for I have made thee this day a fortified city, and a pillar of iron, and a wall of brass over all the land."
Thus Christ says of himself: "The Lord hath made my mouth like a sharp sword: in the shadow of his hand he hath protected me, and hath made me as a chosen arrow," Isaiah XLIX, 2.
IV. Jeremiah says, chapter I, 11: "I see a rod watching."
Concerning Christ it is said, Psalm II, 9: "Thou shalt rule them with a rod of iron, and shalt break them in pieces like a potter's vessel." And Psalm XLIV, 7: "The rod of thy direction, the rod of thy kingdom."
V. Jeremiah says, chapter I, 13: "I see a seething pot."
Concerning Christ the judge it is said, Psalm XCVI, 3: "Fire shall go before him, and shall burn his enemies round about;" and Luke III, 17: "He will burn the chaff with unquenchable fire."
VI. To Jeremiah, chapter I, 16, God says: "I will speak my judgments with them (the Gentiles) upon all their wickedness."
Christ is appointed judge of the living and the dead, and on the day of judgment he will say to the Saints: "Come, ye blessed of my Father," but to the wicked: "Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire," Matthew chapter XXV, 34 and 41.
VII. Chapter II, 21, God says through Jeremiah to the Synagogue: "I planted thee a chosen vineyard, all true seed: how then art thou turned to me into that which is good for nothing, a wild vine?"
Thus Christ says to the same: "A certain householder planted a vineyard, etc., and let it out to husbandmen:" but they killed his servants, and even his son; he therefore "will destroy those evil men," Matthew XXI, 33, 41.
VIII. Chapter III, God cries out through Jeremiah: "Turn, O backsliding Israel, and rebellious Juda, return to me, and I will heal your backslidings."
Christ cries out, Matthew XI, 28: "Come to me, all you that labour, and are burdened, and I will refresh you."
IX. Chapter VI, 6, Jeremiah says to Jerusalem: "This is the city of visitation;" that is, of punishment and destruction, "all deceit is in the midst of her."
Christ, seeing Jerusalem, wept over it, saying: "If thou also hadst known, etc., that days shall come upon thee: and thy enemies shall cast a trench about thee, etc., and shall beat thee flat to the ground, etc., because thou hast not known the time of thy visitation," Luke XIX.
X. Chapter VII, 11, Jeremiah says: "Is this house, in which my name is called upon, become a den of robbers in your eyes?"
Christ says, Matthew XXI, 13: "It is written: My house shall be called the house of prayer; but you have made it a den of robbers."
(1) What the relations of similitude between Jeremiah and Christ have been, Bossuet expounds clearly and piously in that golden work entitled: Meditations on the Gospel, in the last week of Christ from day 98 to 109.
XI. Chapter IX, 23, the Lord says through Jeremiah: "Let not the wise man glory in his wisdom, and let not the strong man glory in his strength, and let not the rich man glory in his riches; but let him that glorieth glory in this, that he understandeth and knoweth me, because I am the Lord that exercise mercy, and judgment, and justice in the earth."
Christ says through Paul, I Corinthians I, 27: "The foolish things of the world hath God chosen, that he may confound the wise; and the weak things of the world hath God chosen, that he may confound the strong; and the base things of the world, and the things that are contemptible, hath God chosen, and things that are not, that he might bring to nought things that are; that no flesh should glory in his sight. But of him you are in Christ Jesus, who of God is made unto us wisdom, and justice, and sanctification, and redemption; that, as it is written: He that glorieth, let him glory in the Lord."
XII. Chapter XI, 19, Jeremiah says: "And I was as a meek lamb, that is carried to the slaughter: and I knew it not."
Concerning Christ Isaiah says, chapter LIII, 7: "He shall be led as a sheep to the slaughter, and shall be silent as a lamb before his shearer, and shall not open his mouth."
XIII. In the same place Jeremiah says: "They devised counsels against me, saying: Come, and let us put wood in his bread, and cut him off from the land of the living."
The Jews devised to crucify Christ, and cried out to Pilate: "Crucify him, crucify him," John XIX, 6.
XIV. Chapter XIV, 8, Jeremiah says to God: "O the expectation of Israel, the saviour thereof in the time of trouble; why wilt thou be as a stranger in the land, and as a wayfarer turning aside to tarry?"
Such a wayfarer was Christ, who travelled throughout all Judaea preaching the gospel, and after three years of preaching, leaving the land as if it were a lodging, returned to his heaven.
XV. Chapter XV, 10, Jeremiah says: "Woe is me, my mother! why didst thou bear me a man of strife, a man of contention to all the earth? all curse me."
Concerning Christ Simeon says: "Behold, this child is set for the fall, and for the resurrection of many in Israel, and for a sign which shall be contradicted," Luke chapter II, verse 34.
XVI. Chapter XVI, 16, God says to Jeremiah: "Behold, I will send many fishers; and they shall fish them."
Christ called Peter and Andrew, fishermen, saying: "Come after me, and I will make you to be fishers of men," Matt. IV, 19.
XVII. Cap. XVIII, 6 and 11, God says: "As clay in the hand of the potter, so are you in my hand, O house of Israel. Behold, I frame evil against you."
Thus Christ from the same clay and mass of the human race makes "one vessel unto honour, another unto dishonour," Rom. IX, 21 and 22.
XVIII. Cap. XVIII, 18, the Jews said: "Come, and let us devise devices against Jeremiah: and let us smite him with the tongue."
Thus the Jews took counsel against Jesus, that they might catch him in his speech, and that they might hold him by deceit; indeed they sought out and suborned false witnesses against him, Matt. cap. XXII, 15, and Matt. cap. XXVI, 59.
XIX. Cap. XX, 2, Pashur struck Jeremiah the prophet.
Thus "one of the servants gave Jesus a blow, saying: Dost thou so answer the high priest?" John cap. XVIII, vers. 22.
XX. Cap. XX, 7, Jeremiah says: "I am become a derision all the day, all mock me."
Thus Christ says, Psalm. XXI, 7: "But I am a worm, and no man, the reproach of men, and the outcast of the people; all they that saw me have derided me: they have spoken with the lips, and wagged the head."
XXI. Cap. XXVI, 11, Jeremiah, because he prophesies the destruction of the city and temple, hears: "This man is worthy of death."
Christ, because he was said to have said: "I am able to destroy the temple of God," etc., hears from Caiaphas and the whole council: "He is guilty of death," Matt. XXVI, 61 and 66.
XXII. Cap. XXVI, 15, Jeremiah says: "If you kill me, you will shed innocent blood against yourselves and against this city."
The Jews crying out against Christ: "Crucify him," say to Pilate, who wished to release the innocent Christ: "His blood be upon us, and upon our children," Matt. XXVII, 25.
XXIII. Cap. XXXI, 15, Jeremiah says: "A voice was heard on high, lamentation, and mourning, and weeping, Rachel weeping for her children, and refusing to be comforted for them, because they are not."
Matt. II, 17, in the infanticide of Herod, it says: "Then was fulfilled that which was spoken by Jeremiah the prophet, saying: A voice was heard in Rama, much weeping and wailing, Rachel weeping for her children, and would not be comforted, because they are not."
XXIV. Cap. XXXI, 22, Jeremiah says: "The Lord hath created a new thing upon the earth: A WOMAN SHALL COMPASS A-
Isaiah, cap. VII, 14, and from him Matt. I, 23, concerning Christ and the virgin mother say: "Behold a Virgin shall con-
CEIVE AND BEAR A SON." 32 paragraphs
ceive and shall bring forth a son, and his name shall be called Emmanuel, that is, God with us."
XXV. Cap. XXXI, 31, the Lord says to Jeremiah: "Behold the days come, and I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Juda."
Christ instituted this covenant and testament, Hebr. VIII; Matt. XXVI, 28.
XXVI. Cap. XXXVI, 26: "King Joakim commanded that they should take Baruch the scribe, and Jeremiah the Prophet; but the Lord hid them."
Thus the Jews often sought to seize Jesus: "But he hid himself, and going through the midst of them went his way," and at the end of his life, he withdrew into the city of Ephrem, John XI, 54.
XXVII. Cap. XXXVII, 14, the Princes smote Jeremiah, and sent him into prison.
Thus the Jews seized Christ, buffeted him and scourged him.
XXVIII. Cap. XXXIX, Jeremiah, destined for death by his own people, was received with honour by Nebuchadnezzar and the Chaldeans.
Thus Christ "came unto his own, and his own received him not:" namely the Jews killed him, but the Gentiles received and worshipped him.
XXIX. Cap. XLIII, 5, Johanan, fearing Nebuchadnezzar, fled, and took Jeremiah with him into Egypt.
Thus Joseph, fearing Herod the infanticide, took the child Jesus into Egypt, Matt. II, 14.
Finally hear Ezra, or whoever is the author, lib. IV Esdrae, cap. II, 18: "I will send thee for help my servants: Isaiah and Jeremiah, by whose counsel I have sanctified and prepared for thee twelve trees, laden with various fruits, and as many fountains flowing with milk and honey, and seven immense mountains, having the rose and the lily, in which I will fill thy children with joy." By the twelve trees and fountains, the twelve Apostles, and the twelve articles of their Creed seem to be signified; by the seven mountains, the seven Sacraments of the Church; which Isaiah and Jeremiah foretold would adorn the new Church of Christ. For although this book of Ezra is not in the canon of Sacred Scripture, it nevertheless has its weight of authority, and greater than the books of other Doctors: wherefore the Church also places it next to the canonical books.
Title Page
From the Books of Hemeterius Valverde Tellez, Bishop of Leon
Commentaries on Sacred Scripture by R. P. Cornelius a Lapide
Commentaries on Sacred Scripture
By R. P. Cornelius a Lapide, of the Society of Jesus, formerly Professor of Sacred Scripture at Louvain, afterwards at Rome, carefully revised and illustrated with notes by Jos. Max. Peronne, Honorary Canon and Parochial Dean of the Diocese of Soissons, formerly Professor of Sacred Scripture.
New edition, carefully purged of the errors which had crept into the former.
Volume Twelve: On Jeremiah, Lamentations, Baruch and Ezekiel.
Paris, at the house of Ludovicus Vives, Bookseller and Publisher, 13, Street commonly called Delambre, 13. MDCCCXCI.
Prolegomena on the Prophet Jeremiah
XXV. Cap. xxxi, 31, the Lord says to Jeremiah: "Behold, the days come, and I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Juda."
Christ instituted this covenant and testament, Hebr. viii; Matth. xxvi, 28.
XXVI. Cap. xxxvi, 26: "The king Joakim commanded that they should seize Baruch the scribe, and Jeremiah the Prophet; but the Lord hid them."
Thus the Jews often sought to seize Jesus: "But he hid himself, and going through the midst of them went his way," and at the end of his life, he withdrew into the city of Ephrem, Joan. xi, 54.
XXVII. Cap. xxxvii, 14, the Princes seized Jeremiah, and sent him into prison.
Thus the Jews seized Christ, buffeted him and scourged him.
XXVIII. Cap. xxxix, Jeremiah, destined for death by his own people, was received with honor by Nabuchodonosor and the Chaldeans.
Thus Christ "came unto his own, and his own received him not:" namely, the Jews killed him, but the Gentiles received and worshipped him.
XXIX. Cap. xliii, 5, Johanan, fearing Nabuchodonosor, fled, and led Jeremiah with him into Egypt.
Thus Joseph, fearing Herod the infanticide, led the child into Egypt, Matth. ii, 14.
Finally hear Esdras, or whoever is the author, lib. IV Esdrae, cap. ii, 18: "I will send thee for help my servants: Isaias and Jeremiah, by whose counsel I have sanctified and prepared for thee twelve trees, laden with various fruits, and as many fountains flowing with milk and honey, and seven immense mountains, having the rose and the lily, in which I will fill thy sons with joy." By the twelve trees and fountains, the twelve Apostles, and the twelve articles of their Creed; by the seven mountains, the seven Sacraments of the Church seem to be signified, by which Isaias and Jeremiah foretold that the new Church of Christ was to be adorned. For although this book of Esdras is not in the canon of Sacred Scripture, it nevertheless has its weight of authority, and greater than that of the books of other Doctors: wherefore the Church also places it next to the canonical books.
Synopsis and Gems of the Lamentations, Sermons and Deeds of Jeremiah 5 paragraphs
I. Hear Jeremiah, hear priest, hear prophet of the Lord. Before I formed thee in the womb, I knew thee: and before thou camest forth out of the womb, I sanctified thee, and made thee a prophet unto the nations. Ah, ah, ah, Lord God: behold, I cannot speak, for I am a child. I have made thee a fortified city, and a pillar of iron, and a wall of brass, over all the land. What seest thou, Jeremiah? I see a rod watching. Thou hast seen well, for I will watch over my word to perform it. What seest thou? I see a seething pot, and the face thereof from the face of the north. From the north shall evil break forth upon all the inhabitants of the earth.
II. Israel is holy to the Lord, the firstfruits of his increase. What iniquity have your fathers found in me, that they have gone far from me, and have walked after vanity, and are become vain? Be astonished, O ye heavens, at this: and ye gates thereof, be ye desolate exceedingly. For my people have done two evils: they have forsaken me, the fountain of living water, and have digged to themselves cisterns, broken cisterns, that can hold no water. Know ye, and see that it is evil and bitter for thee to have forsaken the Lord thy God. From of old thou hast broken my yoke, thou hast burst my bands, and thou saidst: I will not serve.
III. Thou hast played the harlot with many lovers: yet return to me, saith the Lord: at least now call upon me: thou art my father, the guide of my virginity. Treacherous Juda, and thou hast turned away, O Israel, thou hast committed fornication with stone and wood. Return, and I will give you pastors according to my heart, and they shall feed you with knowledge and doctrine. In that time they shall call Jerusalem the throne of the Lord, and all nations shall be gathered unto it in the name of the Lord. How shall I set thee among the children, and give thee a desirable land, a goodly heritage of the armies of the Gentiles? Turn again, ye children that return, and I will heal your backslidings.
IV. If thou wilt take away thy stumbling blocks out of my sight, thou shalt not be moved. And thou shalt swear: The Lord liveth in truth, and in judgment, and in justice. Break up your fallow ground: be circumcised to the Lord, and take away the foreskins of your hearts. Cry out: The lion is come up from his den, and the spoiler of the nations is risen up. Behold, he shall come up as a cloud, and his chariots as a whirlwind: his horses are swifter than eagles: woe unto us, for we are laid waste. My bowels, my bowels, I am pained at the very heart: my heart maketh a noise in me, I cannot hold my peace, because thou hast heard, O my soul, the sound of the trumpet, the alarm of war. Destruction upon destruction is called: for the whole earth is laid waste. All the wise men are become fools, and they have not known the way of the Lord. Hear ye the voice as of one in travail, the anguish as of a woman in labour. The voice of the daughter of Sion dying away, spreading forth her hands: Woe is me, for my soul hath fainted because of the slain.
V. Go about the streets of Jerusalem, and see, and know, and seek in the broad places thereof, if you can find a man that executeth judgment, and seeketh faith: and I will be merciful unto him. Therefore the lion out of the wood hath slain them, and the wolf in the evening hath spoiled them: the leopard watcheth for their cities. Every one that goeth out thence shall be taken: because they have multiplied their transgressions, and their backslidings are increased. Wonderful and horrible things are done in the land: the prophets prophesied lies, and the priests clapped their hands, and my people loved such things.
Machine translation from the Latin, not reviewed.
St Thomas Aquinas
Hic est fratrum amator, et populi Israel; hic est qui multum orat pro populo et universa sancta civitate, Jeremias propheta Dei. 2 Mach. ult. Verba ista sunt Oniae summi sacerdotis ad Judam Machabaeum, in visione Jeremiam commendantis. Ex quibus quatuor possunt accipi circa praesens opus quod prae manibus habetur; scilicet auctor, materia, modus, et utilitas. Circa auctorem tria designat praesens auctoritas; scilicet officium, affectum et actum. In officio ostenditur prophetalis dignitas: unde dicit: Jeremias propheta domini. In affectu fraterna caritas: unde dicit: hic est fratrum amator. In actu compassionis pietas: unde dicit: hic est qui multum orat pro populo, et universa sancta civitate. Dicitur autem propheta Dei ad differentiam aliorum qui non sunt prophetae Dei. Sunt enim quidam prophetae caeli, quidam prophetae Diaboli, quidam prophetae Dei. Prophetae caeli sunt qui ex figuris caeli in motibus siderum futura conjicere student; et de istis dicitur Isa. 47: stent, et salvent te augures caeli, qui contemplabantur sidera, et supputabant menses, ut ex eis annuntiarent ventura tibi. Et ad hunc modum prophetiae reducitur omnis divinatio, quae fit per aliquas causas vel signa in rebus naturalibus inventa. Prophetae Diaboli sunt qui ex revelatione Daemonum aliqua futura cognoscunt, quae quidem, ut dicit Augustinus, ipsi Daemones cognoscunt experientia longi temporis, vel perspicacitate naturae, vel revelatione supernorum spirituum. Et de istis dicitur infra 2: prophetae prophetaverunt in Baal, et idola secuti sunt. Prophetae autem Dei sunt qui mediantibus Angelis, ut dicit Dionysius, de futuris a Deo illuminationem accipiunt. Unde Cassiodorus dicit, quod prophetia est divina inspiratio rerum eventus immobili veritate denuntians. Et ideo dicitur Luc. 1: tu puer propheta altissimi vocaberis, et cetera. Prima prophetia contemnenda est, quia vana: non enim habet immobilem veritatem. Effectus enim recipiunt contingentiam a causis proximis, non necessitatem a causis primis. Et ideo dicitur infra 10: a signis caeli nolite metuere. Secunda est fugienda omnino, quia deceptoria et perniciosa. Zach. 13: pseudoprophetas, et spiritum immundum auferam de terra. Tertia est sequenda et tenenda, quia illuminativa. 2 Petr. 1: habemus firmiorem propheticum sermonem, cui bene facitis attendentes, quasi lucernae lucenti in caliginoso loco. Dicuntur autem isti sancti prophetae, prophetae Dei propter tria. Primo quia a Deo inspirati. Joel. 2: effundam de spiritu meo super omnem carnem, et prophetabunt filii vestri, et filiae vestrae. E contrario de falsis prophetis, qui per spiritum suum loquuntur, dicitur Ezech. 13: vae prophetis insipientibus qui sequuntur spiritum suum, et nihil vident. Secundo quia a Deo missi. Matth. 23: ecce ego mitto ad vos prophetas, et sapientes, et Scribas. Isa. 29: et nunc misit me dominus, et spiritus ejus. E contrario de falsis prophetis infra 23: non mittebam eos, et ipsi currebant; non loquebar ad eos, et ipsi prophetabant. Tertio quia Deum testificati (Act. 10): huic omnes prophetae testimonium perhibent, et cetera. Isa. 44: vos estis testes mei. Affectus autem ostenditur fervens fraterna caritate: unde dicit: hic est fratrum amator. Affectus autem prophetarum tripliciter variatur. Quidam enim sunt amatores lucri. Isa. 56: dormientes, et amantes somnia: et canes impudentissimi nescierunt saturitatem, et cetera. Quidam amatores favoris humani, de quibus Matth. 23: amant primos recubitus in caenis. Sed tertii sunt amatores populi, implentes illud apostoli ad Heb. ult.: caritas fraternitatis maneat in vobis, et hospitalitatem nolite oblivisci. Primi spoliabant divitiis. Michaeae 3: haec dicit dominus super prophetas qui seducunt populum meum, qui mordent dentibus, et praedicant pacem. Ezech. 13: violabant me ad populum meum propter pugillum hordei et fragmen panis, ut interficerent animas quae non moriuntur, et vivificarent animas quae non vivunt, mentientes populo meo credenti mendaciis. Secundi decipiebant blanditiis. Ezech. 22: prophetae ejus liniebant eos absque temperamento, videntes vana et divinantes eis mendacium. Sed tertii instruebant veris doctrinis. Infra 3: dabo vobis pastores juxta cor meum, et pascent vos scientia et doctrina. In actu autem ipsius, ostenditur pia compassio ejus ad populum suum, ibi, hic est qui multum orat. Est oratio ejus multa, sive magna tripliciter. Primo altitudine contemplationis. Infra 18: recordare quod steterim in conspectu tuo, ut loquerer pro eis bonum, et averterem indignationem tuam ab eis. In conspectu ejus astare est per contemplationem praesto esse. Secundo fuit magna ex magnitudine compassionis. Thren. 2: conturbata sunt viscera mea, effusum est in terra jecur meum. Tertio fuit magna assiduitate temporis, quia ante captionem, et post. Unde Jacobi ult.: multum valet deprecatio justi assidua. Et haec tria, scilicet prophetalis dignitas, fraternalis caritas, et compassionis pietas, necessaria sunt prophetae. Cum ergo propheta constituatur quasi medius inter Deum et populum, sicut dicitur Deut. 5: ego sequester et medius fui inter Deum et vos: oportet quod per donum prophetiae conjungatur Deo, sicut dicitur Sapien. 7: per nationes in animas sanctas se transfert; et per caritatis vinculum jungatur populo. Ephes. 4: soliciti servare unitatem spiritus in vinculo pacis. Et sic orando causam populi referant ad Deum, et praedicando causam Dei ad populum. Ex his autem tribus statim apparent alia tria. Ex officio enim patet modus: procedit enim per similitudines et figuras, qui proprius modus prophetarum est. Num. 12: si quis fuerit inter vos propheta domini, in visione apparebo ei, et per somnium loquar ad illum. Ex affectu patet utilitas: sicut enim dicitur Eccli. 6: amicus fidelis medicamentum vitae et immortalitatis. Est enim finis bene vivere, et ad immortalitatis gloriam pervenire. Sed materia apparet ex actu: est enim materia secundum sensum historicum captivitas populi, quae compassionis orationem excitabat. Unde dicitur Baruch 3: anima in angustiis et spiritus anxius clamant ad te. Hic autem libro Jeremiae, qui librum de Hebraeo in Latinum transtulit, praemittit prooemium in quo more theorico tria facit. Primo reddit attentos; secundo dociles facit, ibi, hic vaticinari exorsus est puer; tertio benevolos, ibi, quod nos mensurae metri versibusque reddidimus. Reddit autem attentos dupliciter. Primo ex Scripturae profunditate; secundo ex scribentis auctoritate, ibi, sacerdos ex sacerdotibus. Circa primum duo facit. Primo commendat profunditatem mysterii, in quo aequat ipsum aliis prophetis, ibi, sed sensibus par. Et causam ostendit, unitatem spiritus inspirantis, ibi, quippe qui eodem spiritu prophetaverit. 1 Corinth. 14: spiritus est qui loquitur mysteria. Job 32: inspiratio omnipotentis dat intelligentiam. Secundo excusat rusticitatem eloquii, ibi, porro simplicitas eloquii, de loco ei in quo natus est, accidit. Et ideo ipse dicit infra 1: nescio loqui, quia puer ego sum. Auctoritatem autem scribentis ostendit ex tribus. Primo ex genere simul et dignitate, ibi, sacerdos ex sacerdotibus: unde suum erat docere legem. Malach. 2: labia sacerdotis custodiunt scientiam, et legem requirunt ex ore ejus. Secundo ex privilegiata sanctitate: et in matris utero sanctificatus. Unde dicitur cap. 1: antequam exires de vulva, sanctificavi te. Tertio ex carnis integritate, virginitate, quae probatur ex hoc quod dicitur infra 16: non accipies uxorem in loco isto, et non erunt tibi filii. Hic vaticinari exorsus est puer. Hic reddit dociles, determinans tempus: captivitatem urbis non solum spiritu, futuram, sed et oculis carnis intuitus est, praesentem: et determinans materiam, quia scilicet non decem tribubus, sed tantum duabus prophetavit. Jam decem tribus Israel, Assyrii in Medos transtulerant. 4 enim Reg. 17, patet, quod decem tribus captivatae sunt a rege Assyriorum tempore Achaz regis Juda. Coloniae, idest alienigenae ad incolendam terram adducti. Planxit, in threnis. Quod nos mensurae metri, versibusque reddidimus. Hic reddit benevolos ex persona sua, tribus locis. Primo de bonis a se factis sine arrogantia, dicens: quod nos mensurae, singulis scilicet versibus litteras ordinatim praescribentes, quantum ad threnos; per ordinem, quantum ad ipsum librum Jeremiae. Secundo crimen illatum diluit, excusans se de Baruch, quam praetermisit. Librum autem Baruch notarii ejus, qui apud Hebraeos nec legitur nec habetur, praetermisimus. Tertio ostendit quae sibi difficultates instent ex contradictione aemulorum: unde primo ponit eorum invidiam, pro his omnibus: secundo ponit assumpti laboris causam, et haec patior, quia vos cogitis. Ceterum; quasi dicat: nisi essent preces vestrae, poteram eorum rabiem nihil transferendo evadere.