Letters231 Letter CCXXXI. To the same three bishops on behalf of the
Letter CCXXXI. To the same three bishops on behalf of the
Abbot OF LAGNY. He asserts the innocence of this Abbot.
1. I dare to say to you whatever comes uppermost. For if it behoved you to bear a little with my folly, your good-will will, no doubt, bear with my manner, for you are debtor both to the wise and to the foolish. And I say this not.because I am thinking of thoughtlessly saying a word not pertinent to the matter, or of using levity, or taking pleasure in trifles, especially before you, who are seen to be pillars of the Church; but out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh, and, when grief is urgent within, truth is. impatient of repression, and bursts out into speech. For my feet, I tell you, had almost gone, my treadings had well-nigh slipped, because by what appears an accursed inversion of things wickedness so often overcomes wisdom. The ungodly are lifting their horn higher, the zeal of righteousness is being disarmed, and there is no one who will or can do good. The proud do wickedly on every side, and no one dares whisper against them. And I would that innocence were safe, and that righteousness were enough for its own defence. What sin has the Abbot of Lagny committed?x Is it that he is both good as a monk, and better as an abbot—that he is of good report and of better life? Or is it that he has adorned by his pity, and enriched with worldly goods, and increased in numbers of good brothers, the monastery over which he presides? Behold, this crime is laid to his charge. If it is a crime to have been approved by God and men, let him be lifted up and crucified. For heaven and earth are witnesses that it cannot be denied that he has been. If it is a crime to be hospitable, kind, sober, chaste, humble, let him deservedly come empty out of the hands of his enemies. For he is really all these, and in these he cannot be accused; the sanctity of his life and the glory of his renown prove him to be these.
Provost, interposed, since the Abbot was getting ready to go out, and said that he, in the Abbot's place, would see the man. I leave you to determine if any want of respect was shown to the man, and whose fault it was. He is also accused of having taken a letter of my lord the Pope from Humbert by force and of having opened it; but the letter exists, still unopened and sealed; he did not lay hands on it, but Humbert, by the advice of Count Theobald and myself, handed it to him of his own accord. The charge, therefore, is false. He is said also to have imprisoned some monks. That, too, is false. But if he did divide into different cells some who were mutinous and conspirators, lest they should do more harm by being thrown together, who that can judge rightly can possibly blame this? Then as to the charge that he has squandered and alienated the lands and goods of the Church and given them to his relations, sufficient reply was given before in the presence of the venerable Bishops of Soissons and Auxerre, and of Count Theobald, who acted as advocate of the monastery; and I give it again, that he gave to his own as to others, i.e., according to the same scale and custom.
3. Moreover, since the beginning of the world, it was never heard that a mutinous, haughty, and ambitious monk merited from the apostolic See the privilege of his liberty. From the time of Judas Iscariot none has been found like him, to rise in this way against his master, and betray innocent blood. Happy is the master to whom the words of the prophet are common with the Master of all, Mine own familiar friend in whom I trusted, who did also eat of my bread, hath laid great wait for me (Ps. xli. 9). Before, indeed, you were lording it over the clergy against Peter the Apostle (i S. Pet. v. 3), nay, against his co-apostle Paul, you were lording it over the faith of the whole earth (2 Cor. i. 23). But now you have added" a new sin in taking upon you too much against religion itself. What remains but that you should proceed to lord it over the holy angels themselves? Except that in this, the last Judas seems to have surpassed the first in craftiness and cunning, inasmuch as while all his fellow-disciples shuddered at the infamous deed of the one, the other has had the craft to entrap, not any undistinguished person, but the very leaders of the Apostles, to connive at, nay, even to favour his wickedness. I do not impute sin to my lord, from whom, being but man, [a decision could be snatched by fraud, and I pray that God will not impute it. But God forbid that, when he knows the truth, the accursed and sacrilegious attempts of this evil man should prevail. And I would have written about this to my lord himself (Innocent) with my usual venturesomeness, if I had not perceived that he receives with less than his wonted favour whatever I write to him. Do you, I beseech you, who are monks,- mourn the fortune of your master of S. Benedict, who, as you see, is in danger of being opposed on all sides; so will all the vigour of monastic discipline perish, if monks are to use the strong hand, and to lift up their horns against their abbots.
1. Vobis audeo loqui quidquid in buccam venerit. Nam etsi oportuerit sustineri modicum quid insipientiae meae, geret mihi procul dubio morem benevolentia vestra, quae sapientibus et insipientibus debitrix est. Et hoc dico, non quia cogitem praecipitare verbum quod ad rem non pertinet, aut levitate uti intendam, aut nugari delectet, praesertim apud vos, qui videmini columnae Ecclesiae: sed ex abundantia cordis os loquitur, et veritas, dolore urgente intrinseco, taciturnitatis impatiens, prorumpit in medium. Mei enim, dico vobis, pene moti sunt pedes, pene effusi sunt gressus mei, quod exsecranda, ut videtur, conversione tam frequenter sapientiam vincit malitia. Adduntur ubique cornua impiis, et exarmatur justitiae zelus: et non est qui facere bonum, non dico velit, sed possit. Superbi inique agunt usquequaque, et nemo audet mutire contra. Et utinam vel innocentia tuta esset, et justitia ipsa suimet sufficeret defensioni. Quid peccavit abbas Latiniacensis? An quod bonus monachus, et melior abbas? quod bonae opinionis, et melioris est vitae? An quia monasterium, cui praeest, et decoravit religione, et bonis temporalibus ampliavit, et bonorum fratrum numero cumulavit? En sanguis iste de manu ejus exquiritur. Si crimen est acceptum esse Deo et hominibus; tollatur, et crucifigatur. Negari enim non potest hoc illum esse, coelo et terra testibus. Si crimen est esse hospitalem, benignum, sobrium, castum, humilem; decidat merito ab inimicis suis inanis. Revera namque et in his excusari non potest, convincentibus se propriae vitae sanctitate, et famae gloria.
2. At imponitur ei, noluisse suscipere nuntium domini mei. Prorsus gravis offensa, si ita est. Non negat abbas, hominem qui mittebatur in Angliam, cum esset honorifice susceptus hospitio, quaerere loqui cum eo; sed paranti exire intervenit Humbertus praepositus, dicens se potius exiturum, et homini vice ipsius satisfacturum. Si quo minus quod oportuit, actum fuit cum viro; cujus culpa fuerit, vobis relinquimus judicandum. Accusatur item quod litteras domini Papae praedicto Humberto violenter abstulerit, et diruperit. Sed exstant litterae integrae et bullatae: nec vi eas, sicut mentitur, amisit, sed sponte dimisit, consilio utique comitis Theobaldi, et nostro. Dicitur quoque quod quosdam monachos in captionem posuerit. Atque id quidem falsum. Sed si quosdam turbatores et conspiratores in diversa claustra divisit, ne simul positi plus nocerent, quis hoc recte judicantes reprehendat? Jam de terris et bonis ecclesiae quasi distractis et alienatis, et datis ab eo cognatis suis, coram venerabilibus episcopis Suessionensi et Autissiodorensi, comiteque Theobaldo, advocato utique monasterii, satis responsum est, et adhuc respondetur, sic illum dedisse suis, quomodo alienis, id est ad eumdem censum vel consuetudinem.
3. Porro autem a saeculo non est auditum quod monachus rebellis, superbus, ambitiosus, privilegium propriae libertatis ex apostolica auctoritate meruerit. A tempore Judae Iscariotis non est inventus similis illi, qui sic insurgeret in magistrum, et traderet sanguinem justum. Felix magister, cui cum Magistro omnium communis prophetica illa vox est: Homo pacis meae, in quo sperabam, qui edebat panes meos, magnificavit super me supplamationem. Et olim quidem eratis, contra apostolum Petrum, dominantes in clerum; imo et, contra coapostolum ejus Paulum, dominabamini fidei totius orbis: at nunc novum aliquid addidistis, usurpantes amplius et in ipsam religionem. Quid restat, nisi ut adjiciatis et ipsis Angelis sanctis dominari? Nisi quod in hoc posterior Judas priorem vicisse versutia et fraude videtur: quod cum illius facinus condiscipuli horruerint universi; iste callidior potuit ad connivendum, imo ad favendum suae malitiae, non quoslibet, sed ipsos Apostolorum principes circumvenire. Non imputo domino meo, cui, tanquam homini, subripi potuit; et hoc oro, ne Deus imputet. Absit autem, ubi veritatem agnoverit, ut praevaleat tam exsecrabilis maligni hujus sacrilegusque conatus! Et ego de hac re ad ipsum quoque solito ausu scripsissem, si non sensissem ipsum, quidquid scribimus, minus solito acceptare. Quaeso, dolete vos, qui monachi estis, vicem magistri vestri beati Benedicti: cui jam, ut videtis, prope est ut ubique contradicatur, et pereat omnis vigor monasticae disciplinae, monachis adversus abbates suos cornua sumentibus de manu forti.