Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 87

St Augustine of Hippo (AD 354–430) · In Joannis evangelium tractatus CXXIV · PL 35, 1379–1976

87.1 Chapter XV. 17–19 PL 35, 1852

1. In the Gospel lesson which precedes this one, the Lord had said: “Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you, and appointed you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and [that] your fruit should remain; that whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in my name, He may give it you.” On these words you remember that we have already discoursed, as the Lord enabled us. But here, that is, in the succeeding lesson which you have heard read, He says: “These things I command you, that ye love one another.” And thereby we are to understand that this is our fruit, of which He had said, “I have chosen you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and [that] your fruit should remain.” And what He subjoined, “That whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in my name, He may give it you,” He will certainly give us if we love one another; seeing that this very thing He has also given us, in choosing us when we had no fruit, because we had chosen Him not; and appointing us that we should bring forth fruit,—that is, that we should love one another,—a fruit that we cannot have apart from Him, just as the branches can do nothing apart from the vine. Our fruit, therefore, is charity, which the apostle explains to be, “Out of a pure heart, and a good conscience, and faith unfeigned.” So love we one another, and so love we God. For it would be with no true love that we loved one another, if we loved not God. For every one loves his neighbor as himself if he loves God; and if he loves not God, he loves not himself. For on these two commandments of love hang all the law and the prophets: this is our fruit. And it is in reference, therefore, to such fruit that He gives us commandment when He says, “These things I command you, that ye love one another.” In the same way also the Apostle Paul, when wishing to commend the fruit of the Spirit in opposition to the deeds of the flesh, posited this as his principle, saying, “The fruit of the Spirit is love;” and then, as if springing from and bound up in this principle, he wove the others together, which are “joy, peace, long-suffering, kindness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance.” For who can truly rejoice who loves not good as the source of his joy? Who can have true peace, if he have it not with one whom he truly loves? Who can be long-enduring through persevering continuance in good, save through fervent love? Who can be kind, if he love not the person he is aiding? Who can be good, if he is not made so by loving? Who can be sound in the faith, without that faith which worketh by love? Whose meekness can be beneficial in character, if not regulated by love? And who will abstain from that which is debasing, if he love not that which dignifies? Appropriately, therefore, does the good Master so frequently commend love, as the only thing needing to be commended, without which all other good things can be of no avail, and which cannot be possessed without bringing with it those other good things that make a man truly good.

In lectione evangelica quae hanc antecedit, dixerat Dominus: Non vos me elegistis; sed ego elegi vos, et posu vos, ut eatis et fructum afferatis, et fructus vester maneat: ut quodcumque petieritis Patrem in nomine meo, det vobis. De quibus verbis jam nos quod Dominus dedit, disseruisse meministis. Hic autem dicit, sequenti scilicet lectione, quam modo cum recitaretur, audistis: Haec mando vobis, ut diligatis invicem. Ac per hoc intelligere debemus hunc esse fructum nostrum de quo ait, Ego vos elegi ut eatis, et fructum afferatis, et fructus vester maneat. Et quod adjunxit, Ut quodcumque petieritis Patrem in nomine meo, det vobis: tunc utique dabit nobis, si diligamus invicem; cum et hoc ipsum ipse dederit nobis, qui nos elegit non habentes fructum, quia non eum nos elegeramus; et posuit nos ut fructum afferamus, hoc est, invicem diligamus: quem fructum sine illo habere non possumus, sicut palmites facere sine vite nihil possunt. Charitas ergo est fructus noster, quam definit Apostolus, de corde puro et conscientia bona, et fide non ficta . Hac diligimus invicem, hac diligimus Deum. Neque enim vera dilectione diligeremus invicem, nisi diligentes Deum Diligit enim unusquisque proximum tanquam seipsum, si diligit Deum: nam si non diligit Deum, non diligit seipsum. In his enim duobus praeceptis charitatis tota Lex pendet et Prophetae : hic est fructus noster. De fructu itaque nobis mandans, Haec mando, inquit, vobis, ut diligatis invicem. Unde et apostolus Paulus, cum contra opera carnis commendare fructum spiritus vellet, a capite hoc posuit, Fructus, inquit, spiritus charitas est: ac deinde caetera tanquam ex isto capite exorta et religata contexuit, quae sunt, gaudium, pax, longanimitas, benignitas, bonitas, fides, mansuetudo, continentia . Quis autem bene gaudet, qui bonum non diligit unde gaudet? Quis pacem veram, nisi cum illo potest habere quem veraciter diligit? Quis est longanimis in bono perseveranter manendo, nisi ferveat diligendo? Quis est benignus, nisi diligat cui opitulatur? Quis bonus, nisi diligendo efficiatur? Quis salubriter fidelis, nisi ea fide quae per dilectionem operatur? Quis utiliter mansuetus, cui non dilectio moderetur? Quis ab eo continet unde turpatur, nisi diligat unde honestatur? Merito itaque magister bonus dilectionem sic saepe commendat, tanquam sola praecipienda sit, sine qua non possunt prodesse caetera bona, et quae non potest haberi sine caeteris bonis, quibus homo efficitur bonus.

87.2 PL 35, 1853

2. But alongside of this love we ought also patiently to endure the hatred of the world. For it must of necessity hate those whom it perceives recoiling from that which is loved by itself. But the Lord supplies us with special consolation from His own case, when, after saying, “These things I command you, that ye love one another,” He added, “If the world hate you, know that it hated me before [it hated] you.” Why then should the member exalt itself above the head? Thou refusest to be in the body if thou art unwilling to endure the hatred of the world along with the Head. “If ye were of the world,” He says, “the world would love its own.” He says this, of course, of the whole Church, which, by itself, He frequently also calls by the name of the world: as when it is said, “God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto Himself.” And this also: “The Son of man came not to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.” And John says in his epistle: “We have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous: and He is the propitiation for our sins; and not for ours only, but also [for those] of the whole world.” The whole world then is the Church, and yet the whole world hateth the Church. The world therefore hateth the world, the hostile that which is reconciled, the condemned that which is saved, the polluted that which is cleansed.

Pro hac autem dilectione patienter debemus etiam mundi odia sustinere. Necesse est enim ut nos oderit, quos cernit nolle quod diligit. Sed plurimum nos de seipso Dominus consolatur, qui cum dixisset, Haec mando vobis, ut diligatis invicem; adjecit, atque ait, Si mundus vos odit, scitote quoniam me priorem vobis odio habuit. Cur ergo se membrum supra verticem extollit? Recusas esse in corpore, si non vis odium mundi sustinere cum capite. Si de mundo, inquit, essetis, mundus quod suum erat diligeret. Universae utique hoc dicit Ecclesiae, quam plerumque etiam ipsam mundi nomine appellat: sicut est illud, Deus erat in Christo, mundum reconcilians sibi . Itemque illud. Non venit Filius hominis ut judicet mundum, sed ut salvetur mundus per ipsum . Et in Epistola sua Joannes ait: Advocatum habemus ad Patrem, Jesum Christum justum, et ipse propitiator est peccatorum nostrorum; non tantum nostrorum, sed etiam totius mundi . Totus ergo mundus Ecclesia est, et totus mundus odit Ecclesiam. Mundus igitur odit mundum, inimicus reconciliatum, damnatus salvatum, inquinatus mundatum.

87.3 PL 35, 1853

3. But that world which God is in Christ reconciling unto Himself, which is saved by Christ, and has all its sins freely pardoned by Christ, has been chosen out of the world that is hostile, condemned, and defiled. For out of that mass, which has all perished in Adam, are formed the vessels of mercy, whereof that world of reconciliation is composed, that is hated by the world which belongeth to the vessels of wrath that are formed out of the same mass and fitted to destruction. Finally, after saying, “If ye were of the world, the world would love its own,” He immediately added, “But because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.” And so these men were themselves also of that world, and, that they might no longer be of it, were chosen out of it, through no merit of their own, for no good works of theirs had preceded; and not by nature, which through free-will had become totally corrupted at its source: but gratuitously, that is, of actual grace. For He who chose the world out of the world, effected for Himself, instead of finding, what He should choose: for “there is a remnant saved according to the election of grace. And if by grace,” he adds, “then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace.”

Sed iste mundus quem Deus in Christo reconciliat sibi, et qui per Christum salvatur, et cui per Christum peccatum omne donatur, de mundo electus est inimico, damnato, contaminato. Ex ea quippe massa quae tota in Adam periit, fiunt vasa misericordiae, in quibus est mundus pertinens ad reconciliationem: quem mundus odit, ex eadem massa pertinens ad vasa irae, quae perfecta sunt ad perditionem . Denique cum dixisset, Si de mundo essetis, mundus quod suum erat diligeret; continuo subjecit, Quia vero de mundo non estis, sed ego elegi vos de mundo, propterea odit vos mundus. Ergo et ipsi inde erant, unde ut non essent, electi sunt inde, non meritis suis, quorum nulla bona praecesserant opera; non natura, quae tota fuerat per liberum arbitrium in ipsa radice vitiata: sed gratuita, hoc est vera gratia. Qui enim de mundo mundum elegit, fecit quod eligeret, non invenit: quia reliquiae per electionem gratiae salvae factae sunt. Si autem gratia, inquit, jam non ex operibus; alioquin gratia jam non est gratia .

87.4 PL 35, 1853

4. But if we are asked about the love which is borne to itself by that world of perdition which hateth the world of redemption; we reply, it loveth itself, of course, with a false love, and not with a true. And hence, it loves itself falsely, and hates itself truly. For he that loveth wickedness, hateth his own soul. And yet it is said to love itself, inasmuch as it loves the wickedness that makes it wicked; and, on the other hand, it is said to hate itself, inasmuch as it loves that which causes it injury. It hates, therefore, the true nature that is in it, and loves the vice: it hates what it is, as made by the goodness of God, and loves what has been wrought in it by free-will. And hence also, if we rightly understand it, we are at once forbidden and commanded to love it: thus, we are forbidden, when it is said to us, “Love not the world;” and we are commanded, when it is said to us, “Love your enemies.” These constitute the world that hateth us. And therefore we are forbidden to love in it that which it loves in itself; and we are enjoined to love in it what it hates in itself, namely, the workmanship of God, and the various consolations of His goodness. For we are forbidden to love the vice that is in it, and enjoined to love the nature, while it loves the vice in itself, and hates the nature: so that we may both love and hate it in a right manner, whereas it loves and hates itself perversely.

Si autem quaeratur quomodo se diligat mundus perditionis, qui odit mundum redemptionis; diligit se utique falsa dilectione, non vera. Proinde falso se diligit, et vere odit. Qui enim diligit iniquitatem, odit animam suam . Sed diligere se dicitur, quoniam iniquitatem qua iniquus est diligit: et rursus odisse se dicitur, quoniam quod ei nocet, hoc diligit. Odit ergo in se naturam, diligit vitium: odit quod factus est per Dei bonitatem, diligit quod in eo factum est per liberam voluntatem. Unde nos quoque illum diligere et prohibemur, si recte intelligimus, et jubemur: prohibemur scilicet, ubi nobis dicitur, Nolite diligere mundum ; jubemur autem, ubi nobis dicitur, Diligite inimicos vestros . Ipsi sunt mundus qui nos odit. Ergo et prohibemur diligere in illo quod ipse diligit in seipso; et jubemur diligere in illo quod ipse odit in seipso, Dei scilicet opificium, et diversas bonitatis suae consolationes. Vitium quippe in illo diligere prohibemur, jubemurque diligere naturam, cum ipse in se diligat vitium, oderitque naturam: ut nos eum et diligamus et oderimus recte, cum se ipse diligat oderitque perverse.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Save for later

Enter your email and we will send you a sign-in link. No password. What you save (articles, verses, chapters, documents) follows you to any device.