Sermons on the Song of Songs50 Sermon L

St Bernard of Clairvaux († 1153) · Sermones in Cantica canticorum · 1135-1153

Sermon L

Google TWO KINDS OF CHARITY charity, and the sweeter as they are smaller, and the more savoury as more minutely divided. Otherwise, it would be too much against charity to defraud you of charity itself. Therefore, here is my subject: He has set in order charity, in me (ii. 4).

2. There is charity in action, and there is charity in feeling. As concerning the first, I think that it is a law and explicit commandment given to men; but, as relates to the other, who can have it in such perfection as is contemplated by the precept? The one, therefore, is ordered as a command, the other given as a reward. We do not deny, however, that with the grace of God it is possible, even in this life, to attain the commencement, and even some degree of progress in the latter; but we maintain that the consummation of it is reserved for the happiness to come. How, then, has that been commanded, which can by no means be fulfilled by us? Or if you prefer to think that the command given has reference to charity in feeling, this I would not contest, provided that you agree with me in allowing that it is not possible for any man perfectly to fulfil it, nor has it ever been possible. For who would dare to arrogate to himself a success which St. Paul himself confesses that he had not attained? (Phil, iii. 13). Nor did our great Teacher conceal that the weight of this precept exceeded the powers of men; but He has considered it useful to call man's attention by means of this fact to his own weakness, and that he might thus learn towards what object of righteousness to direct his efforts as far as his powers permitted. In commanding, then, things which are impossible [to the unaided strength of men], He has made men, not offenders, but humble: that every mouth may be stopped and all the world may be made subject to God. Because by the works of the Laiv no flesh shall be justified before Him (Rom. iii. 19, 20, Douay). We, then, receiving the commandment, and feeling ourselves to come short of it, shall raise our cry to Heaven, and our God shall have pity upon us, and we shall learn in that day that not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to His mercy He saved us (Titus iii. 5).

3. This is what I would say, provided that we were all of opinion that the charity of the heart and of the feelings was commanded by a distinct law imposed upon us. But the reason which seems to refer the law rather to charity in act is that when the Lord had said:

1 Tract, de Diligendo Deo, x. 29.

3 The opinion of St. Bernard is, that the precept regarding charity relates rather to charity in act, than in feeling. But by charity in feeling he means that lofty and perfect love which is to be found only in the saints and those who are perfect. Again, by charity in act [actualem) he means that which does not consist simply in feeling, but comes forth and shows itself in action; but he did not by any means intend to exclude inward charity from it. ' I do not say,' he declares further on (». 4), 4 that we ought to be without feelings of charity'; on the contrary, charity in act should include charity in thought, which, although it does not as yet refresh the soul with the sweetness of inward deKght, yet it powerfully contributes to fire it with the love of that love itself.' Now it is precisely inward love * with which charity in act is content' («. 6). See on thb subject the Admonition to De Diligendo Deo, Bk. ii.

4. I do not say that we ought to be without feelings of charity, that the heart should be barren and unmoved, and that all we should do is to raise our hands to actions [of charity} I have read among the great and grave crimes, which the Apostle writes, that men commit, this enumerated, that they are without natural affection (Rom. i. 31). But there is an affection which the flesh produces, there is another which reason rules, and a third which is seasoned by wisdom. The first is that of which the Apostle says, that it is not subject to the i~w of God, neither indeed can be (Rom. viii. 7); the second, on the contrary, because it is good, shows itself consentient to the Divine law, and there is no doubt, therefore, that these two arc contrary the one to the other, since the one resists, and the other conforms to [the Divine Will]. As for the third, it is wholly different from each of the former, for it tastes and appreciates fully the sweetness of the Lord (Ps. xxxiv. 8); it banishes the first, and rewards the second. The first is attractive indeed, but dishonourable; the second dry, but steady and strong; but the third full of unction and sweetness. It is, then, by the second that (good) works are done, and in it charity consists; not, indeed, that charity of heart and feeling, which is seasoned with the salt of wisdom, and made fat with an unction from above, so as to bring to the soul the abundance of sweetness which is in God; but rather a certain charity of action, which, though it does not as yet refresh the soul with the sweetness of inward delight, yet powerfully contributes to fire it with the love of that love itself. Let us not love, says St John, in word, nor in tongue, but in deed and in truth (1 John iil 18).

1 ' Where, then, are these to be kept?* says St Bernard in Sermon V. for Advent, n, 2. No doubt in the heart, as he there explains; but they ought to be to the heart what food is to the body, and ' pass not only into the affections, bit also into the character and actions of life.* TWO KINDS OF CHARITY 5. Do you observe how cautiously he proceeds, between love which is vicious and love which is only in feeling, distinguishing from each of these the real and saving charity? He does not admit in it the feigned love of a false tongue; nor, again, does he demand the lofty and consummate enjoyment of active wisdom. Let us love, he says, in deed and in truth; that is to say, let us be moved to the doing of good works rather by the powerful impulse of truth and fact than by a feeling of emotional charity. He has set in order charity in me. Which of these two kinds of charity? Each of them, in fact, but in a reverse order. For charity in act chooses rather (for its sphere) the lower sphere of life, while that of thought and feeling chooses the higher. There is, for example, no doubt that in a right-thinking soul the love of God is preferred to the love of man, heaven to earth, eternity to time, the soul to the body. And yet in well-regulated action the opposite order is frequently, or almost always, found to prevail. For we are both more frequently occupied, and more busily, with cares for the temporal good of our neighbour, and among our brethren we assist with more diligent assiduity those who are more infirm; we apply ourselves, by the right of humanity and the necessity of the case, more to promote the peace of the earth than the glory of heaven; in our anxiety about temporal interests we scarcely permit ourselves to think anything about those which are eternal; in sickness our bodily pains and weakness occupy us almost without ceasing, and the care of our soul is laid aside; and, lastly, we surround our weaker members, according to the saying of the Apostle, with more abundant honour (1 Cor. xii. 23), and thus we fulfil, after a fashion, that saying of the Lord: The last shall be f. st, and the first last (Matt xx. 16). Who doubts that a man, when he is in prayer, is speaking with God? and yet how often are we withdrawn, and, so to speak, torn away, from prayer, and that at the very dictate of charity, because of those who are in need of our assistance or our advice! How often does holy quiet give place, and that from a pious motive, to the tumult'of business affairs! How often do we with a good conscience lay down the manuscript we are reading, to go and perspire over manual labour! How often, in order to carry out our worldly occupations, do we (and that very justly) temporarily supersede even the Celebration of the solemnities of the Holy Eucharist I A preposterous order in which to act; but necessity has no law.

1 Among the Cistercians the Daily Services {Sacra) used at one time to be intermitted during the harvest. On which account Philip Augustus, having heard that among the monks of Barbeaux, * at the period of harvest, the brethren used to sojourn in their farmhouses, and thus on account of their temporal interests the celebration of mass was omitted,' is said to have given an order that thenceforth mass should be celebrated every day, in the morning, for the soul of his father, who was buried there. There are letters on this subject in De Re DiplomaticAy Bk. vi., p. 603. As to St. Bernard himself, we learn from his * Life/ by Geoffrey (Bk. v., c. 1), that he scarcely ever omitted to offer the holy sacrifice Mown to his last illness' (Mabillon's note).

2 Necessitas non habet legem. This is said in the dictionaries to be a ' Maxim of Law,' but I have not been able to trace it to any one author.—Ed.

6. Not so with charity in feeling; that commences always with the first things. For wisdom sets upon all things the value which is really theirs; thus, for example, that which is in its nature the more valuable receives from it the greater measure of attention; those which have less value receive less, and those which have less still, least of all. It is truth, then, that determines this order of charity; but it is charity that adopts it. For the true charity consists in this, that those whose needs are greatest receive first; and, again, charitable truth is manifest, in preserving in our affections that order which is founded in the reason. If, then, you love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, with all thy soul, with all thy strength (Matt. xxii. 37), rising in the earnestness of that affection above that love of love, with which actual charity is content, and receiving in all its fulness the Divine love (to which that other love serves only as a step), are wholly fired and pervaded by it, assuredly you have a knowledge of God, although you cannot know Him adequately or as He is (which is a thing impossible to any creature), but at least such a knowledge of Him as you are capable of receiving here below. Then you shall have a true knowledge of yourself also, when you attain a perception of the fact that you have nothing whatever in yourself to deserve love, except in so far as you belong to God, and because you have poured out upon Him all the affection you can command. You well know yourself, I repeat, as you really are, when by experience of your own love, and of the affection which you bear to your own self, you find nothing in yourself that merits your love, except it is on account of Him without whom you yourself have no existence at all.

7. Now, as to your neighbour, whom you are bidden to love as yourself, you shall know him also as he is, provided that he does not appear to you as other than you appear to yourself; for he is that which you are; he is man, as you. Since, then, you love yourself only because you love God, it follows that you love as yourself all those who love God as you love Him. As for an enemy, he is, as it were, nothing, since he has no love for God; you cannot, therefore, love him as you love yourself, who do love God; but you will love even him that he may learn to love God. For it is not the same thing to love a person so that he may love God, and to love him because be does this. In order, then, that you may know him as he really is, you must consider, not that which he is at the present moment (for he is nothing), but that which he may perhaps some day be, which is next to nothing, as long as the matter is still in doubt. Further- 1 In certain MSS. the word amoris is wanting. But it is not at variance with the thought of St. Bernard, who, in treating of charity in act (n, 4), says, *it powerfully contributes to fire the soul with the love of that love itself.' TWO KINDS OF CHARITY more, if there be one who will clearly never return to the love of God, you must look upon him, not as almost nothing, but as nothing at all, inasmuch as throughout eternity he is nothing. With the exception, then, of such a person as he, who is not merely not to beloved, but who is, besides this, to be held in hatred, according to that saying of the Psalmist: Do I not hate them, O Lord> that hate Thee and am not I griejted with them that rise up against Thee? (Ps. cxxxix. 21) charity, which is jealous in this respect, does not allow that you should refuse to any man, even to your most bitter enemy, some small measure of affection. Whoso is wise will ponder these things.

8. Give me a man who, before all things, loves God with all his being; who loves both himself and his neighbour in the same degree in which each loves God; who loves his enemy as one who may perhaps at some time in the future turn to the love of God; who loves his relatives according to the flesh very tenderly, on account of nature, but his spiritual parents, that is, those who have instructed him, more abundantly on account of grace, and thus his love for all other things whatsoever is regulated by his love for God; who despises the earth, and looks upward to the heaven; who uses this world as not abusing it, and knows how to distinguish, by a certain inward faculty of soul, between things which are to be chosen and loved, and those to be merely used, so that things transitory are made use of as they pass for temporary need, and as long as the need requires, while things eternally enduring are embraced with lasting joy: show me, I say, a man such as this, and I will boldly pronounce him wise, since he takes things for what they truly are, and is able with truth and confidence to boast: He hath set in order charity in me. But where is such an one to be found, and when shall it be thus with him? This I ask weeping: how long shall we perceive this fragrance without tasting it? how long look forward to our heavenly home, without attaining it, sighing for it while beholding it from afar? O Truth, fatherland of exiled souls, and end of their exile! I descry thee, but am unable to enter in; I am detained in the flesh, I am defiled by my sins, I am not worthy to be admitted. O Wisdom, whose powerful guidance extendest from the beginning to the end of all things, establishing and controlling them; who disposest all with admirable gentleness, ordering, blessing, and gladdening all affections, direct our actions according as our temporal necessities require, and dispose our affections as thy eternal truth demands; so that each of us may be able securely to glory in Thee, and say: He has set in order charity in me. For Thou art the Power of God and the Wisdom of God, Jesus Christ our Lord, the Bridegroom of the Church, God above all, Blessed for ever. Amen.

1. Vos forsitan exspectatis tractari sequentia, explicitum putantes versiculum, qui novissime tractabatur. Verum ego aliud molior: habeo enim quod adhuc vobis apponam de fragmentis hesterni convivii, quae mihi collegeram ne perirent. Peribunt autem, si nulli apposuero: nam si voluero ea habere solus, ipse peribo. Nolo proinde vestram illis, quam bene novi, fraudare ingluviem: praesertim cum sint de ferculo charitatis, eo dulcia quo subtilia; eo sapida quo minuta. Alioquin contra charitatem est valde nimis de ipsa charitate fraudare. Itaque hic sum: Ordinavit in me charitatem.

2. Est charitas in actu, est et in affectu. Et de illa quidem quae operis est, puto datam esse legem hominibus, mandatumque formatum: nam in affectu quis ita habeat, ut mandatur? Ergo illa mandatur ad meritum, ista in praemium datur. Cujus initium quidem, profectumque vitam quoque praesentem experiri divina posse gratia non negamus; sed plane consummationem defendimus futurae felicitati. Quomodo ergo jubenda fuit, quae implenda nullo modo erat? Aut si placet tibi magis de affectuali datum fuisse mandatum, non inde contendo, dummodo acquiescas et tu mihi, quod minime in vita ista ab aliquo hominum possit, vel potuerit adimpleri. Quis enim sibi arrogare id audeat, quod se Paulus ipse fatetur non comprehendisse? Nec latuit praeceptorem, praecepti pondus hominum excedere vires; sed judicavit utile ex hoc ipso suae illos insufficientiae admoneri, et ut scirent sane, ad quem justitiae finem niti pro viribus oporteret. Ergo mandando impossibilia, non praevaricatores homines fecit, sed humiles, ut omne os obstruatur, et subditus fiat omnis mundus Deo; quia ex operibus legis non justificabitur omnis caro coram illo. Accipientes quippe mandatum, et sentientes delictum, clamabimus in coelum, et miserebitur nostri Deus: et sciemus in illa die, quia non ex operibus justitiae quae fecimus nos, sed secundum suam misericordiam salvos nos fecit.

3. Atque hoc dixerim, siquidem consenserimus affectualem legem fuisse mandatam. Sed actuali id potius convenire inde vel maxime apparere videtur, quod cum dixisset Dominus: Diligite inimicos vestros, mox de operibus infert: Benefacite his qui oderunt vos. Item Scriptura: Si esuriet inimicus tuus, ciba illum; si sitit, potum datu. Et hic de actu habes, non de affectu. Sed audi item Dominum etiam de sui dilectione mandantem: Si diligitis me, inquit, sermones meos servate. Atque hic quoque ad opera mittimur per injunctam observantiam mandatorum. Supervacue autem de opere monuisset, si in affectione jam fuisset dilectio. Sic te ergo necesse est et illud accipere, quod juberis diligere proximum tuum sicut te ipsum, etsi non ita aperte expressum sit. An non denique satis tibi esse judices ad implendum istud de proximi dilectione mandatum, si id perfecte observes, in quo omni homini recte de lege naturae praescribitur: Quod tibi non vis fieri, alii ne feceris? Et item illud: Quaecunque vultis ut faciant vobis homines, et vos facite aliis.

4. Neque hoc dico, ut sine affectione simus, et corde arido solas moveamus manus ad opera. Legi inter alia, quae scribit Apostolus magna et gravia hominum mala, hoc quoque annumeratum, sine affectione scilicet esse. Sed est affectio quam caro gignit; et est quam ratio regit, et est quam condit sapientia. Prima est, quam Apostolus legi Dei dicit non esse subjectam, nec esse posse; secunda, quam perhibet e regione consentientem legi Dei, quoniam bona est; nec dubium distare inter se contentiosam et consentaneam. Longe vero tertia ab utraque distat, quae et gustat, et sapit quoniam suavis est Dominus, primam eliminans, secundam remunerans. Nam prima quidem dulcis, sed turpis; secunda sicca, sed fortis; ultima pinguis, et suavis est. Igitur per secundam opera fiunt, et in ipsa charitas sedet, non illa affectualis, quae sale sapientiae condita pinguescens magnam menti importat multitudinem dulcedinis Domini; sed quaedam potius actualis, quae etsi nondum dulci illo amore suaviter reficit, amore tamen amoris ipsius vehementer accendit. Non diligamus, ait, verbo, neque lingua, sed opere et veritate.

5. Vides quomodo caute medius incedit inter vitiosum atque affectuosum amorem, ab utroque pariter hanc distinguens actualem et salutiferam charitatem? Nec linguae mentientis in hac dilectione recipit fictum, nec rursum afficientis exigit sapientiae gustum. Opere, inquit, diligamus et veritate: quod videlicet moveamur ad bene operandum magis quodam vividae veritatis impulsu, quam sapidae illius charitatis affectu. Ordinavit in me charitatem. Quam putas harum? Utramque, sed ordine opposito. Nam actualis inferiora praefert, affectualis superiora. Etenim in bene affecta mente non dubium, verbi causa, quin dilectioni hominis Dei dilectio praeponatur, et in hominibus ipsis perfectiores infirmioribus, coelum terrae, aeternitas tempori, anima carni. Attamen in bene ordinata actione saepe, aut etiam semper, ordo oppositus invenitur. Nam et circa proximi curam et plus urgemur, et pluries occupamur; et infirmioribus fratribus diligentiori sedulitate assistimus; et paci terrae magis quam coeli gloriae jure humanitatis et ipsa necessitate intendimus; et temporalium inquietudine curarum vix aliquid sentire de aeternis permittimur; et languoribus nostri corporis, postposita animae cura, pene continue inservimus; et ipsis denique infirmioribus membris nostris abundantiorem honorem, juxta sententiam Apostoli, circumdamus: per hoc quodam modo facientes verbum Domini, de quo habes: Erunt novissimi primi, et primi novissimi. Orantem denique hominem cum Deo loqui quis dubitet? Quoties tamen inde charitate jubente abducimur et avellimur, propter eos qui nostra indigent opera vel loquela? quoties pie cedit negotiorum tumultibus pia quies? quoties bona conscientia ponitur codex, ut operi manuum insudetur? quoties pro administrandis terrenis, justissime ipsis supersedemus celebrandis missarum solemniis? Ordo praeposterus: sed necessitas non habet legem. Agit ergo suum actualis charitas ordinem juxta patrisfamilias jussionem, incipiens a novissimis. Pia certe et justa, quae non sit acceptrix personarum; nec pretia consideret rerum, sed hominum necessitates.

6. At non ita affectualis: nam a primis ipsa ducit ordinem. Est enim sapientia, per quam utique quaeque res sapiunt prout sunt: ut, verbi gratia, quae pluris natura habet, pluris quoque ipsa affectio sentiat, minora minus, minima minime. Et illum quidem ordinem charitatis veritas facit; hunc autem veritatis charitas vindicat sibi. Nam et vera in hoc est charitas, ut qui indigent amplius, accipiant prius: et rursus in eo chara apparet veritas, si ordinem tenemus affectu, quem illa ratione. Tu ergo si diligas Dominum Deum tuum toto corde, tota anima, tota virtute tua; et amorem amoris illum, quo contenta est charitas actualis, affectu ferventiori transiliens, ipso cominus divino amore, ad quem is est gradus, accepto in plenitudine spiritu, totus ignescas: sapit tibi profecto Deus, etsi non digne omnino prout est (quod utique impossibile est omni creaturae), certe prout tuum sapere est. Deinde sapies etiam ipse tu tibi prout es, cum te senseris nil habere prorsus, unde te ames, nisi in quantum Dei es: quippe qui totum unde amas, in illum effuderis. Sapies, inquam, tibi prout es, cum ipso experimento amoris tui, et affectionis quam ad te ipsum habebis, nihil dignum te esse invenies, quod vel a te ipso ametur, nisi propter ipsum, sine quo ipse es nihil.

7. Jam vero proximus, quem vere te oportet diligere tanquam te ipsum, ut tibi et ipse sapiat prout est, haud aliud profecto sapiet tibi, quam tu tibi, qui hoc est quod tu: est enim homo. Qui itaque te non diligis, nisi quia diligis Deum; consequenter omnes qui similiter diligunt eum, diligis tanquam te ipsum. Porro inimicum hominem, quoniam nihil est, pro eo quod non diligit Deum; non potest quidem diligere tanquam te ipsum, qui Deum diligis; diliges tamen ut diligat. Non est autem id ipsum, diligere ut diligat, et diligere quia diligit. Proinde ut tibi et ipse sapiat prout est, sapiet tibi, non quidem quod est, qui utique nihil est; sed quod futurus forsitan est. quod est prope nihili, quippe quod adhuc pendet sub dubio. Etenim de quo constat quod ad amorem Dei non sit deinceps rediturus, sapiat tibi necesse est, non prope jam nihil, sed nihil ex toto, utpote quod in aeternum nihil est. Illo igitur excepto, qui non modo jam non diligendus, insuper et odio habendus est, secundum illud: Nonne qui oderunt te, Domine, oderam, et super inimicos tuos tabescebam? De caetero nulli vel inimicissimo homini negari quantulumcunque affectum charitas sane in hac parte ambitiosa permittit. Quis sapiens, et intelliget haec?

8. Da mihi hominem, qui ante omnia quidem ex toto se diligat Deum; se vero et proximum, in quantum diligunt ipsum; inimicum autem, tanquam aliquando forsitan dilecturum; porro parentes carnis suae germanius, propter naturam; spirituales vero eruditores suos profusius, propter gratiam; atque in hunc modum ad caetera quaeque Dei ordinato intendat amore, despiciens terram, suspiciens coelum, utens hoc mundo tanquam non utens, et inter utenda et fruenda intimo quodam mentis sapore discernens, ut transitoria transitorie, et ad id duntaxat quod opus, et prout opus est curet, aeterna desiderio amplectatur aeterno: talem, inquam, da mihi hominem, et ego audacter illum sapientem pronuntio, cui nimirum quaeque res revera sapiunt prout sunt, et cui in veritate atque securitate competit gloriari, et dicere, quia ordinavit in me charitatem. Sed ubi ille, aut quando ista? Quod flens dico, quousque odoramus, et non gustamus, prospicientes patriam, et non apprehendentes, suspirantes, et de longe salutantes? O veritas exsulum patria, exsilii finis? video te, sed intrare non sinor carne retentus, sed nec dignus admitti, peccatis sordens. O Sapientia, quae attingis a fine usque ad finem fortiter in instituendis et continendis rebus; et disponis omnia suaviter in beandis et ordinandis affectibus! dirige actus nostros, prout nostra temporalis necessitas poscit; et dispone affectus nostros, prout tua veritas aeterna requirit, ut possit unusquisque nostrum secure in te gloriari et dicere, quia ordinavit in me charitatem. Tu es enim Dei virtus et Dei sapientia, Christus sponsus Ecclesiae, Dominus noster, super omnia Deus benedictus in saecula. Amen.

Samuel J. Eales (active by 1879; M.A., Principal of S. Boniface College, Warminster, in 1882), Life and Works of Saint Bernard, Abbot of Clairvaux, edited by Dom John Mabillon, vol. IV: Cantica Canticorum, Eighty-six Sermons on the Song of Solomon, London: John Hodges, 1896. Digital text: OCR of the Internet Archive scan LifeAndWorksOfSaintBernardV4, word-repaired against LifeWorksOfSBernardClairvauxV4. Original text: Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich) TEI of the Patrologia Latina, via the CatholicCorpus mirror. Public domain in the US and Canada: published 1889-1896; translator active by 1879, an M.A. and principal in 1882; necessarily died before 1972. Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina 182-183 (1854), public domain.

Save for later

Enter your email and we will send you a sign-in link. No password. What you save (articles, verses, chapters, documents) follows you to any device.