Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 27
27.1 Chapter VI. 60–72 PL 35, 1615
1. We have just heard out of the Gospel the words of the Lord which follow the former discourse. From these a discourse is due to your ears and minds, and it is not unseasonable to-day; for it is concerning the body of the Lord which He said that He gave to be eaten for eternal life. And He explained the mode of this bestowal and gift of His, in what manner He gave His flesh to eat, saying, “He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him.” The proof that a man has eaten and drank is this, if he abides and is abode in, if he dwells and is dwelt in, if he adheres so as not to be deserted. This, then, He has taught us, and admonished us in mystical words that we may be in His body, in His members under Himself as head, eating His flesh, not abandoning our unity with Him. But most of those who were present, by not understanding Him, were offended; for in hearing these things, they thought only of flesh, that which themselves were. But the apostle says, and says what is true, “To be carnally-minded is death.” The Lord gives us His flesh to eat, and yet to understand it according to the flesh is death; while yet He says of His flesh, that therein is eternal life. Therefore we ought not to understand the flesh carnally. As in these words that follow:
Verba Domini ex Evangelio, quae sermonem pristinum consequuntur, audivimus. Hinc sermo debetur auribus et mentibus vestris, et hodierno diei non importunus est: est enim de corpore Domini, quod dicebat se dare ad manducandum propter aeternam vitam. Exposuit autem modum attributionis hujus et doni sui, quomodo daret carnem suam manducare, dicens, Qui manducat carnem meam, et bibit sanguinem meum, in me manet, et ego in illo . Signum quia manducavit et bibit hoc est, si manet et manetur, si habitat et inhabitatur, si haeret ut non deseratur. Hoc ergo nos docuit et admonuit mysticis verbis, ut simus in ejus corpore sub ipso capite in membris ejus, edentes carnem ejus, non relinquentes unitatem ejus. Sed qui aderant plures non intelligendo scandalizati sunt: non enim cogitabant haec audiendo, nisi carnem, quod ipsi erant. Apostolus autem dicit, et verum dicit, Sapere secundum carnem, mors est . Carnem suam dat nobis Dominus manducare, et sapere secundum carnem mors est; cum de carne sua dicat, quia ibi est vita aeterna. Ergo nec carnem debemus sapere secundum carnem, sicut in his verbis:
27.2 PL 35, 1616
2. “Many therefore,” not of His enemies, but “of His disciples, when they had heard this, said, This is a hard saying; who can hear it?” If His disciples accounted this saying hard, what must His enemies have thought? And yet so it behoved that to be said which should not be understood by all. The secret of God ought to make men eagerly attentive, not hostile. But these men quickly departed from Him, while the Lord said such things: they did not believe Him to be saying something great, and covering some grace by these words; they understood just according to their wishes, and in the manner of men, that Jesus was able, or was determined upon this, namely, to distribute the flesh with which the Word was clothed, piecemeal, as it were, to those that believe on Him. “This,” say they, “is a hard saying; who can hear it?”
Multi itaque audientes; non ex inimicis, sed ex dicipulis ejus, dixerunt: Durus est hic sermo; quis potest eum audire? Si discipuli durum habuerunt istum sermonem, quid inimici? Et tamen sic oportebat ut diceretur, quod non ab omnibus intelligeretur. Secretum Dei intentos debet facere, non adversos. Isti autem cito defecerunt, talia loquente Domino Jesu: non crediderunt aliquid magnum dicentem, et verbis illis aliquam gratiam cooperientem; sed prout voluerunt ita intellexerunt, et more hominum, quia poterat Jesus, aut hoc disponebat Jesus, carnem quia indutum erat Verbum, veluti concisam distribuere credentibus in se. Durus est, inquiunt, hic sermo; quis potest eum audire?
27.3 PL 35, 1616
3. “But Jesus, knowing in Himself that His disciples murmured at it,”—for they so said these things with themselves that they might not be heard by Him: but He who knew them in themselves, hearing within Himself,—answered and said, “This offends you;” because I said, I give you my flesh to eat, and my blood to drink, this forsooth offends you. “Then what if ye shall see the Son of man ascending where He was before?” What is this? Did He hereby solve the question that perplexed them? Did He hereby uncover the source of their offense? He did clearly, if only they understood. For they supposed that He was going to deal out His body to them; but He said that He was to ascend into heaven, of course, whole: “When ye shall see the Son of man ascending where He was before;” certainly then, at least, you will see that not in the manner you suppose does He dispense His body; certainly then, at least, you will understand that His grace is not consumed by tooth-biting.
Sciens autem Jesus apud semetipsum quia murmurarent de eo discipuli ejus. Sic enim apud se ista dixerunt, ut ab illo non audirentur; sed ille qui eos noverat in seipsis, audiens apud semetipsum, respondit, et ait, Hoc vos scandalizat: quia dixi, Carnem meam do vobis manducare, et sanguinem meum bibere, hoc vos nempe scandalizat. Si ergo videritis Filium hominis ascendentem ubi erat prius? Quid est hoc? Hinc solvit quod illos moverat? hinc aperuit unde fuerant scandalizati? Hinc plane, si intelligerent. Illi enim putabant eum erogaturum corpus suum; ille autem dixit se ascensurum in coelum, utique integrum. Cum videritis Filium hominis ascendentem ubi erat prius; certe vel tunc videbitis quia non eo modo quo putatis, erogat corpus suum; certe vel tunc intelligetis quia gratia ejus non consumitur morsibus.
27.4 PL 35, 1616
4. And He said, “It is the Spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing.” Before we expound this, as the Lord grants us, that other must not be negligently passed over, where He says, “Then what if ye shall see the Son of man ascending where He was before?” For Christ is the Son of man, of the Virgin Mary. Therefore Son of man He began to be here on earth, where He took flesh from the earth. For which cause it was said prophetically, “Truth is sprung from the earth.” Then what does He mean when He says, “When ye shall see the Son of man ascending where He was before”? For there had been no question if He had spoken thus: “If ye shall see the Son of God ascending where He was before.” But since He said, “The Son of man ascending where He was before,” surely the Son of man was not in heaven before the time when He began to have a being on earth? Here, indeed, He said, “where He was before,” just as if He were not there at this time when He spoke these words. But in another place He says, “No man has ascended into heaven but He that came down from heaven, the Son of man who is in heaven.” He said not “was,” but, saith He, “the Son of man who is in heaven.” He was speaking on earth, and He declared Himself to be in heaven. And yet He did not speak thus: “No man hath ascended into heaven but He that came down from heaven,” the Son of God, “who is in heaven.” Whither tends it, but to make us understand that which even in the former discourse I commended to your minds, my beloved, that Christ, both God and man, is one person, not two persons, lest our faith be not a trinity, but a quaternity? Christ, therefore, is one; the Word, soul and flesh, one Christ; the Son of God and Son of man, one Christ; Son of God always, Son of man in time, yet one Christ in regard to unity of person. In heaven He was when He spoke on earth. He was Son of man in heaven in that manner in which He was Son of God on earth; Son of God on earth in the flesh which He took, Son of man in heaven in the unity of person.
Et ait: Spiritus est qui vivificat, caro non prodest quidquam. Hoc antequam exponamus, ut Dominus donat, illud non negligenter praetereundum est, quod ait, Si ergo videritis Filium hominis ascendentem ubi erat prius? Filius enim hominis Christus, ex virgine Maria. Ergo filius hominis hic coepit esse in terra, ubi carnem assumpsit ex terra. Unde prophetice dictum erat, Veritas de terra orta est . Quid sibi ergo vult quod ait, Cum videritis Filium hominis ascendentem ubi erat prius? Nulla enim esset quaestio si ita dixisset, Si videritis Filium Dei ascendentem ubi erat prius? cum vero Filium hominis dixit ascendentem ubi erat prius, numquid Filius hominis in coelo erat prius, quando in terra esse coepit? Hic quidem dixit, ubi erat prius, quasi tunc non ibi esset quando haec loquebatur. Alio autem loco ait, Nemo ascendit in coelum, nisi qui de coelo descendit, Filius hominis, qui est in coelo : non dixit, erat, sed, Filius, inquit, hominis qui est in coelo. In terra loquebatur, et in coelo se esse dicebat. Et non ita dixit: Nemo ascendit in coelum, nisi qui de coelo descendit, Filius Dei, qui est in coelo. Quo pertinet, nisi ut intelligamus, quod etiam pristino sermone commendavi Charitati vestrae, unam personam esse Christum Deum et hominem, non duas; ne fides nostra non sit Trinitas, sed quaternitas? Christus ergo unus est: Verbum, anima et caro unus Christus: Filius Dei et filius hominis unus Christus. Filius Dei semper, filius hominis ex tempore; tamen unus Christus secundum unitatem personae. In coelo erat, quando in terra loquebatur. Sic erat filius hominis in coelo, quomodo Filius Dei erat in terra; Filius Dei in terra in suscepta carne, filius hominis in coelo in unitate personae.
27.5 PL 35, 1617
5. What is it, then, that He adds? “It is the Spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing.” Let us say to Him (for He permits us, not contradicting Him, but desiring to know), O Lord, good Master, in what way does the flesh profit nothing, whilst Thou hast said, “Except a man eat my flesh, and drink my blood, he shall not have life in him?” Or does life profit nothing? And why are we what we are, but that we may have eternal life, which Thou dost promise by Thy flesh? Then what means “the flesh profiteth nothing”? It profiteth nothing, but only in the manner in which they understood it. They indeed understood the flesh, just as when cut to pieces in a carcass, or sold in the shambles; not as when it is quickened by the Spirit. Wherefore it is said that “the flesh profiteth nothing,” in the same manner as it is said that “knowledge puffeth up.” Then, ought we at once to hate knowledge? Far from it! And what means “Knowledge puffeth up”? Knowledge alone, without charity. Therefore he added, “but charity edifieth.” Therefore add thou to knowledge charity, and knowledge will be profitable, not by itself, but through charity. So also here, “the flesh profiteth nothing,” only when alone. Let the Spirit be added to the flesh, as charity is added to knowledge, and it profiteth very much. For if the flesh profited nothing, the Word would not be made flesh to dwell among us. If through the flesh Christ has greatly profited us, does the flesh profit nothing? But it is by the flesh that the Spirit has done somewhat for our salvation. Flesh was a vessel; consider what it held, not what it was. The apostles were sent forth; did their flesh profit us nothing? If the apostles’ flesh profited us, could it be that the Lord’s flesh should have profited us nothing? For how should the sound of the Word come to us except by the voice of the flesh? Whence should writing come to us? All these are operations of the flesh, but only when the spirit moves it, as if it were its organ. Therefore “it is the Spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing,” as they understood the flesh, but not so do I give my flesh to be eaten.
Quid est ergo quod adjungit, Spiritus est qui vivificat, caro non prodest quidquam? Dicamus ei (patitur enim nos non contradicentes, sed nosse cupientes): O Domine, magister bone, quomodo caro non prodest quidquam, cum tu dixeris, Nisi quis manducaverit carnem meam, et biberit sanguinem meum, non habebit in se vitam? An vita non prodest quidquam? et propter quid sumus quod sumus, nisi ut habeamus vitam aeternam, quam tua carne promittis? quid est ergo, non prodest quidquam caro? Non prodest quidquam, sed quomodo illi intellexerunt: carnem quippe sic intellexerunt, quomodo in cadavere dilaniatur, aut in macello venditur, non quomodo spiritu vegetatur. Proinde sic dictum est, Caro non prodest quidquam; quomodo dictum est, Scientia inflat. Jam ergo debemus odisse scientiam? Absit. Et quid est, Scientia inflat? Sola, sine charitate: ideo adjunxit, Charitas vero aedificat . Adde ergo scientiae charitatem, et utilis erit scientia; non per se, sed per charitatem. Sic etiam nunc, caro non prodest quidquam, sed sola caro: accedat spiritus ad carnem, quomodo accedit charitas ad scientiam, et prodest plurimum. Nam si caro nihil prodesset, Verbum caro non fieret, ut inhabitaret in nobis. Si per carnem nobis multum profuit Christus, quomodo caro nihil prodest? Sed per carnem Spiritus aliquid pro salute nostra egit. Caro vas fuit; quod habebat attende, non quod erat. Apostoli missi sunt; numquid caro ipsorum nihil nobis profuit? Si caro Apostolorum nobis profuit, caro Domini potuit nihil prodesse? Unde enim ad nos sonus verbi, nisi per vocem carnis? unde stilus, unde conscriptio? Ista omnia opera carnis sunt, sed agitante spiritu tanquam organum suum. Spiritus ergo est qui vivificat, caro autem non prodest quidquam: sicut illi intellexerunt carnem, non sic ego do ad manducandum carnem meam.
27.6 PL 35, 1618
6. Hence “the words,” saith He, “which I have spoken to you are Spirit and life.” For we have said, brethren, that this is what the Lord had taught us by the eating of His flesh and drinking of His blood, that we should abide in Him and He in us. But we abide in Him when we are His members, and He abides in us when we are His temple. But that we may be His members, unity joins us together. And what but love can effect that unity should join us together? And the love of God, whence is it? Ask the apostle: “The love of God,” saith he, “is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Spirit which is given to us.” Therefore “it is the Spirit that quickeneth,” for it is the Spirit that makes living members. Nor does the Spirit make any members to be living except such as it finds in the body, which also the Spirit itself quickens. For the Spirit which is in thee, O man, by which it consists that thou art a man, does it quicken a member which it finds separated from thy flesh? I call thy soul thy spirit. Thy soul quickeneth only the members which are in thy flesh; if thou takest one away, it is no longer quickened by thy soul, because it is not joined to the unity of thy body. These things are said to make us love unity and fear separation. For there is nothing that a Christian ought to dread so much as to be separated from Christ’s body. For if he is separated from Christ’s body, he is not a member of Christ; if he is not a member of Christ, he is not quickened by the Spirit of Christ. “But if any man,” saith the apostle, “have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of His.” “It is the Spirit,” then, “that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing. The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life.” What means “are spirit and life”? They are to be understood spiritually. Hast thou understood spiritually? “They are spirit and life.” Hast thou understood carnally? So also “are they spirit and life,” but are not so to thee.
Proinde, Verba, inquit, quae ego locutus sum vobis, spiritus et vita est. Diximus enim, fratres, hoc Dominum commendasse in manducatione carnis suae et potatione sanguinis sui, ut in illo maneamus, et ipse in nobis. Manemus autem in illo, cum sumus membra ejus: manet autem ipse in nobis, cum sumus templum ejus. Ut autem simus membra ejus, unitas nos compaginat. Ut compaginet unitas, quae facit nisi charitas? Et charitas Dei unde? Apostolum interroga: Charitas, inquit, Dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris per Spiritum sanctum qui datus est nobis . Ergo Spiritus est qui vivificat: spiritus enim facit viva membra. Nec viva membra spiritus facit, nisi quae in corpore quod vegetat ipse spiritus, invenerit. Nam spiritus qui est in te, o homo, quo constas ut homo sis, numquid vivificat membrum quod separatum invenerit a carne tua? Spiritum tuum dico animam tuam: anima tua non vivificat nisi membra quae sunt in carne tua; unum si tollas, jam non vivificatur ex anima tua, quia unitati corporis tui non copulatur. Haec dicuntur ut amemus unitatem, et timeamus separationem. Nihil enim sic debet formidare christianus, quam separari a corpore Christi. Si enim separatur a corpore Christi, non est membrum ejus; si non est membrum ejus, non vegetatur Spiritu ejus: Quisquis autem, inquit Apostolus, Spiritum Christi non habet, hic non est ejus . Spiritus ergo est qui vivificat, caro autem non prodest quidquam. Verba quae ego locutus sum vobis, spiritus et vita sunt. Quid est, spiritus et vita sunt? Spiritualiter intelligenda sunt. Intellexisti spiritualiter? spiritus et vita sunt. Intellexisti carnaliter? etiam sic illa spiritus et vita sunt, sed tibi non sunt.
27.7 PL 35, 1618
7. “But,” saith He, “there are some among you that believe not.” He said not, There are some among you that understand not; but He told the cause why they understand not. “There are some among you that believe not,” and therefore they understand not, because they believe not. For the prophet has said, “If ye believe not, ye shall not understand.” We are united by faith, quickened by understanding. Let us first adhere to Him through faith, that there may be that which may be quickened by understanding. For he who adheres not resists; he that resists believes not. And how can he that resists be quickened? He is an adversary to the ray of light by which he should be penetrated: he turns not away his eye, but shuts his mind. “There are,” then, “some who believe not.” Let them believe and open, let them open and be illumined. “For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed, and who should betray Him.” For Judas also was there. Some indeed, were offended; but he remained to watch his opportunity, not to understand. And because he remained for that purpose, the Lord kept not silence concerning him. He described him not by name, but neither was He silent about him; that all might fear though only one should perish. But after He spoke, and distinguished those that believe from those that believe not, He clearly showed the cause why they believed not. “Therefore I said unto you,” saith He, “that no man can come unto me except it were given to him of my Father.” Hence to believe is also given to us; for certainly to believe is something. And if it is something great, rejoice that thou hast believed, yet be not lifted up; for “What hast thou that thou didst not receive?”
Sed sunt quidam, inquit, in vobis qui non credunt. Non dixit, Sunt quidam in vobis qui non intelligunt; sed causam dixit, quare non intelligant. Sunt enim quidam in vobis qui non credunt; et ideo non intelligunt, quia non credunt. Propheta enim dixit, Nisi credideritis, non intelligetis . Per fidem copulamur, per intellectum vivificamur. Prius haereamus per fidem, ut sit quod vivificetur per intellectum. Nam qui non haeret, resistit; qui resistit, non credit. Nam qui resistit, quomodo vivificatur? Adversarius est radio lucis, quo penetrandus est: non avertit aciem, sed claudit mentem. Sunt ergo quidam qui non credunt. Credant et aperiant, aperiant et illuminabuntur. Sciebat enim ab initio Jesus qui essent credentes, et quis traditurus esset eum. Ibi enim erat et Judas. Nam quidam scandalizati sunt: ille autem mansit ad insidiandum, non ad intelligendum. Et quia ideo manserat, non de illo tacuit Dominus. Non illum expressit, sed nec siluit; ut omnes timerent, quamvis unus periret. Sed posteaquam dixit et distinxit credentes a non credentibus, expressit causam quare non credant: Propterea dixi vobis, inquit, quia nemo potest venire ad me, nisi fuerit ei datum a Patre meo. Ergo et credere datur nobis: non enim nihil est credere. Si autem magnum aliquid est, gaude quia credidisti, sed noli extolli: quid enim habes quod non accepisti ?
27.8 PL 35, 1619
8. “From that time many of His disciples went back, and walked no more with Him.” Went back, but after Satan, not after Christ. For our Lord Christ once addressed Peter as Satan, rather because he wished to precede his Lord, and to give counsel that He should not die, He who had come to die, that we might not die for ever; and He says to him, “Get thee behind me, Satan; for thou savorest not the things that be of God, but the things that be of men.” He did not drive him back to go after Satan, and so called him Satan; but He made him go behind Himself, that by walking after his Lord he should not be a Satan. But these went back in the same manner as the apostle says of certain women: “For some are turned back after Satan.” They walked not further with Him. Behold, cut off from the body, for perhaps they were not in the body, they have lost life. They must be reckoned among the unbelieving, notwithstanding they were called disciples. Not a few, but “many went back.” This happened, it may be, for our consolation. For sometimes it happens that a man may declare the truth, and that what he says may not be understood, and so they that hear it are offended and go away. Now the man regrets that he had spoken that truth, and he says to himself, “I ought not to have spoken so, I ought not to have said this.” Behold; it happened to the Lord: He spoke, and lost many; He remained with few. But yet He was not troubled, because He knew from the beginning who they were that believed and that believed not. If it happen to us, we are sorely perplexed. Let us find comfort in the Lord, and yet let us speak words with prudence.
Ex hoc multi discipulorum ejus abierunt retro, et jam non cum illo ambulaverunt. Abierunt retro, sed post satanam, non post Christum. Nam aliquando Dominus Christus Petrum appellavit satanam, magis quia volebat praecedere Dominum suum, et consilium dare ne moreretur ille, qui venerat ut moreretur, ne nos in aeternum moreremur; et ait illi: Redi post me, satanas; non enim sapis quae Dei sunt, sed quae hominis sunt . Non illum repulit retro ire post satanam, et appellavit satanam; sed fecit post se ire, ut non esset satanas ambulando post Dominum. Isti autem sic redierunt retro, quomodo de quibusdam feminis dicit Apostolus: Quaedam enim conversae sunt retro post satanam . Ulterius cum illo non ambulaverunt. Ecce praecisi a corpore vitam perdiderunt, quia forte in corpore nec fuerunt. Inter non credentes et ipsi deputandi sunt, quamvis discipuli dicerentur. Abierunt retro, non pauci, sed multi. Hoc forte factum est ad consolationem, quoniam aliquando contingit ut dicat homo verum, et quod dicit, non capiatur, atque illi qui audiunt, scandalizentur et discedant. Poenitet autem hominem dixisse quod verum est: dicit enim apud se homo, Non debui sic dicere, non hoc dicere debui. Ecce Domino contigit; dixit, et perdidit multos, remansit ad paucos. Sed non turbabatur ipse, quia ab initio noverat et qui credentes essent, et qui non credentes: nos si nobis contingat, perturbamur. Solatium in Domino inveniamus, et tamen caute verba dicamus.
27.9 PL 35, 1619
9. And now addressing the few that remained: “Then said Jesus to the twelve” (namely, those twelve who remained), “Will ye also,” said He, “go away?” Not even Judas departed. But it was already manifest to the Lord why he remained: to us he was made manifest afterwards. Peter answered in behalf of all, one for many, unity for the collective whole: “Then Simon Peter answered Him, Lord, to whom shall we go?” Thou drivest us from Thee; give us Thy other self. “To whom shall we go?” If we abandon Thee, to whom shall we go? “Thou hast the words of eternal life.” See how Peter, by the gift of God and the renewal of the Holy Spirit, understood Him. How other than because he believed? “Thou hast the words of eternal life.” For Thou hast eternal life in the ministration of Thy body and blood. “And we have believed and have known.” Not have known and believed, but “believed and known.” For we believed in order to know; for if we wanted to know first, and then to believe, we should not be able either to know or to believe. What have we believed and known? “That Thou art Christ, the Son of God;” that is, that Thou art that very eternal life, and that Thou givest in Thy flesh and blood only that which Thou art.
Atque ille ad paucos qui remanserant: Dixit ergo Jesus duodecim; id est illis duodecim qui remanserunt: Numquid et vos, inquit, vultis ire? Non discessit nec Judas. Sed quare manebat, Domino jam apparebat; nobis postea manifestatus est. Respondit Petrus pro omnibus, unus pro multis, unitas pro universis: Respondit ergo ei Simon Petrus: Domine, ad quem ibimus? Repellis nos a te, da nobis alterum te. Ad quem ibimus? Si a te recedimus, ad quem ibimus? Verba vitae aeternae habes. Videte quemadmodum Petrus, dante Deo, recreante Spiritu sancto, intellexit. Unde, nisi quia credidit? Verba vitae aeternae habes. Vitam enim aeternam habes in ministratione corporis et sanguinis tui. Et nos credidimus, et cognovimus. Non cognovimus, et credidimus, sed credidimus, et cognovimus. Credidimus enim ut cognosceremus: nam si prius cognoscere, et deinde credere vellemus, nec cognoscere nec credere valeremus. Quid credidimus, et quid cognovimus? Quia tu es Christus Filius Dei; id est, quia ipsa vita aeterna tu es, et non das in carne et sanguine tuo nisi quod es.
27.10 PL 35, 1619
10. Then said the Lord Jesus: “Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil?” Therefore, should He have said, “I have chosen eleven:” or is a devil also chosen, and among the elect? Persons are wont to be called “elect” by way of praise: or was man elected because some great good was done by him, without his will and knowledge? This belongs peculiarly to God; the contrary is characteristic of the wicked. For as wicked men make a bad use of the good works of God; so, on the contrary, God makes a good use of the evil works of wicked men. How good it is that the members of the body are, as they can be disposed only by God, their author and framer! Nevertheless what evil use doth wantonness make of the eyes? What ill use doth falsehood make of the tongue? Does not the false witness first both slay his own soul with his tongue, and then, after he has destroyed himself, endeavor to injure another? He makes an ill use of the tongue, but the tongue is not therefore an evil thing; the tongue is God’s work, but iniquity makes an ill use of that good work of God. How do they use their feet who run into crimes? How do murderers employ their hands? And what ill use do wicked men make of those good creatures of God that lie outside of them? With gold they corrupt judgment and oppress the innocent. Bad men make a bad use of the very light; for by evil living they employ even the very light with which they see into the service of their villanies. A bad man, when going to do a bad deed, wishes the light to shine for him, lest he stumble; he who has already stumbled and fallen within; that which he is afraid of in his body has already befallen him in his heart. Hence, to avoid the tediousness of running through them separately, a bad man makes a bad use of all the good creatures of God: a good man, on the contrary, makes a good use of the evil deeds of wicked men. And what is so good as the one God? Since, indeed, the Lord Himself said, “There is none good, but the one God.” By how much He is better, then, by so much the better use He makes of our evil deeds. What worse than Judas? Among all that adhered to the Master, among the twelve, to him was committed the common purse; to him was allotted the dispensing for the poor. Unthankful for so great a favor, so great an honor, he took the money, and lost righteousness: being dead, he betrayed life: Him whom he followed as a disciple, he persecuted as an enemy. All this evil was Judas’s; but the Lord employed his evil for good. He endured to be betrayed, to redeem us. Behold, Judas’s evil was turned to good. How many martyrs has Satan persecuted! If Satan left off persecuting, we should not to-day be celebrating the very glorious crown of Saint Laurence. If then God employs the evil works of the devil himself for good, what the bad man effects, by making a bad use, is to hurt himself, not to contradict the goodness of God. The Master makes use of that man. And if He knew not how to make use of him, the Master contriver would not have permitted him to be. Therefore, He saith, “One of you is a devil,” whilst I have chosen you twelve. This saying, “I have chosen you twelve,” may be understood in this way, that twelve is a sacred number. For the honor of that number was not taken away because one was lost, for another was chosen into the place of the one that perished. The number remained a sacred number, a number containing twelve: because they were to make known the Trinity throughout the whole world, that is, throughout the four quarters of the world. That is the reason of the three times four. Judas, then only cut himself off, not profaned the number twelve: he abandoned his Teacher, for God appointed a successor to take his place.
Ait ergo Dominus Jesus: Nonne ego vos duodecim elegi, et unus ex vobis diabolus est? Ergo, Undecim elegi diceret: an eligitur et diabolus, et in electis est diabolus? Electi in laude solent dici: an electus est et iste, de quo nolente et nesciente magnum aliquid boni fieret? Hoc est proprium Dei; contrarium iniquis. Sicut enim iniqui male utuntur bonis operibus Dei; sic contra Deus bene utitur malis operibus hominum iniquorum. Quam bonum est membra corporis ita esse, quemadmodum disponi non possunt nisi ab artifice Deo! Petulantia tamen quam male utitur oculis? Fallacia quam male utitur lingua? Falsus testis nonne lingua sua et animam suam prius trucidat, et alterum laedere se perempto conatur? Male utitur lingua, nec ideo malum est lingua: opus Dei est lingua, sed bono opere Dei male utitur illa nequitia. Quomodo utuntur pedibus qui currunt ad scelera? quomodo utuntur manibus homicidae? et illis adjacentibus forinsecus bonis creaturis Dei quam male utuntur mali? Auro judicia corrumpunt, innocentes opprimunt. Luce ista mali male utuntur: male vivendo enim etiam ipsam lucem qua vident, ad ministerium scelerum suorum usurpant. lens enim ut faciat aliquid mali malus, lucere sibi vult ne offendat, qui jam intus offendit et cecidit: quod timet in corpore, jam incurrit in corde. Omnibus ergo bonis Dei, ne per singula currere longum sit, male utitur malus: contra, malis hominum malorum bene utitur bonus. Et quid tam bonum quam unus Deus? Quandoquidem ipse Dominus dixit, Nemo bonus nisi unus Deus . Quanto ergo ille melior, tanto melius utitur et malis nostris. Quid Juda pejus? Inter omnes adhaerentes Magistro, inter duodecim, loculi illi commissi sunt, et dispensatio pauperum distributa: ingratus tanto beneficio, honori tanto, accepit pecuniam, perdidit justitiam: tradidit vitam mortuus; quem ut discipulus secutus, ut inimicus persecutus est. Totum hoc malum Judae; sed malo ejus bene usus est Dominus. Tradi se pertulit ut redimeret nos. Ecce malum Judae in bonum conversum est. Satanas quantos martyres persecutus est? Si satanas persequendo cessaret, hodie tam gloriosam coronam sancti Laurentii non celebraremus. Si ergo ipsius diaboli malis operibus bene utitur Deus: quod facit malus, male utendo, sibi nocet; non bonitati Dei contradicit. Artifex illo utitur; et magnus artifex, si illo uti non nosset, nec eum esse permitteret. Ergo unus ex vobis diabolus est, ait, cum ego vos duodecim elegerim. Potest et sic intelligi quod ait, duodecim elegi, quia sacratus est numerus. Non enim quia periit inde unus, ideo illius numeri honor demptus est: nam in locum pereuntis, alius subrogatus est . Mansit numerus consecratus, numerus duodenarius; quia per universum mundum, hoc est per quatuor cardines mundi, Trinitatem fuerant annuntiaturi. Ideo ter quaterni. Se ergo exterminavit Judas, non duodenarium numerum violavit: ipse deseruit praeceptorem, nam Deus illi apposuit successorem.
27.11 PL 35, 1620
11. All this that the Lord spoke concerning His flesh and blood;—and in the grace of that distribution He promised us eternal life, and that He meant those that eat His flesh and drink His blood to be understood, from the fact of their abiding in Him and He in them; and that they understood not who believed not; and that they were offended through their understanding spiritual things in a carnal sense; and that, while these were offended and perished, the Lord was present for the consolation of the disciples who remained, for proving whom He asked, “Will ye also go away?” that the reply of their steadfastness might be known to us, for He knew that they remained with Him;—let all this, then, avail us to this end, most beloved, that we eat not the flesh and blood of Christ merely in the sacrament, as many evil men do, but that we eat and drink to the participation of the Spirit, that we abide as members in the Lord’s body, to be quickened by His Spirit, and that we be not offended, even if many do now with us eat and drink the sacraments in a temporal manner, who shall in the end have eternal torments. For at present Christ’s body is as it were mixed on the threshing-floor: “But the Lord knoweth them that are His.” If thou knowest what thou threshest, that the substance is there hidden, that the threshing has not consumed what the winnowing has purged; certain are we, brethren, that all of us who are in the Lord’s body, and abide in Him, that He also may abide in us, have of necessity to live among evil men in this world even unto the end. I do not say among those evil men who blaspheme Christ; for there are now few found who blaspheme with the tongue, but many who do so by their life. Among those, then, we must necessarily live even unto the end.
Hoc totum quod Dominus de carne et de sanguine suo locutus est, et quod in ejus distributionis gratia vitam nobis promisit aeternam, et quod hinc voluit intelligi manducatores et potatores carnis et sanguinis sui, ut in illo maneant et ipse in illis, et quod non intellexerunt qui non crediderunt, et quod spiritualia carnaliter sapiendo scandalizati sunt, et quod eis scandalizatis et pereuntibus, consolationi Dominus adfuit discipulis qui remanserant, ad quos probandos interrogavit, Numquid et vos vultis ire? ut responsio permansionis eorum innotesceret nobis; nam ille noverat quia manebant: hoc ergo totum ad hoc nobis valeat, dilectissimi, ut carnem Christi et sanguinem Christi non edamus tantum in Sacramento, quod et multi mali; sed usque ad spiritus participationem manducemus et bibamus, ut in Domini corpore tanquam membra maneamus, ut ejus spiritu vegetemur, et non scandalizemur, etiam si multi modo nobiscum manducant et bibunt temporaliter Sacramenta, qui habebunt in fine aeterna tormenta. Modo enim corpus Christi mixtum est tanquam in area: sed novit Dominus qui sunt ejus . Si tu nosti quid trituras, quia ibi est latens massa, nec consumit trituratio quod purgatura est ventilatio; certi sumus, fratres, quia omnes qui sumus in corpore Domini, et manemus in illo, ut et ipse maneat in nobis, in hoc saeculo necesse habemus usque in finem inter malos vivere. Non inter illos dico malos, qui blasphemant Christum: rari enim jam inveniuntur qui lingua blasphemant, sed multi qui vita. Necesse est ergo ut inter illos usque in finem vivamus.
27.12 PL 35, 1621
12. But what is this that He saith: “He that abideth in me, and I in him”? What, but that which the martyrs heard: “He that persevereth unto the end, the same shall be saved”? How did Saint Laurence, whose feast we celebrate to-day, abide in Him? He abode even to temptation, abode even to tyrannical questioning, abode even to bitterest threatening, abode even to destruction;—that were a trifle, abode even to savage torture. For he was not put to death quickly, but tormented in the fire: he was allowed to live a long time; nay, not allowed to live a long time, but forced to die a slow, lingering death. Then, in that lingering death, in those torments, because he had well eaten and well drunk, as one who had feasted on that meat, as one intoxicated with that cup, he felt not the torments. For He was there who said, “It is the Spirit that quickeneth.” For the flesh indeed was burning, but the Spirit was quickening the soul. He shrunk not back, and he mounted into the kingdom. But the holy martyr Xystus, whose day we celebrated five days ago, had said to him, “Mourn not, my son;” for Xystus was a bishop, he was a deacon. “Mourn not,” said he; “thou shall follow me after three days.” He said three days, meaning the interval between the day of Saint Xystus’s suffering and that of Saint Laurence’s suffering, which falls on to-day. Three days is the interval. What comfort! He says not, “Mourn not, my son; the persecution will cease, and thou wilt be safe;” but, “do not mourn: whither I precede thou shalt follow; nor shall thy pursuit be deferred: three days will be the interval, and thou shalt be with me.” He accepted the oracle, vanquished the devil, and attained to the triumph.
Sed quid est quod ait, Qui manet in me, et ego in illo ? Quid, nisi quod martyres audiebant, Qui perseveraverit usque in finem, hic salvus erit ? Quomodo mansit in illo sanctus Laurentius, cujus hodie festa celebramus? Mansit usque ad tentationem, mansit usque ad tyrannicam interrogationem, mansit usque ad acerrimam comminationem, mansit usque ad peremptionem: parum est, usque ad immanem excruciationem mansit. Non enim occisus est cito, sed cruciatus est in igne: diu vivere permissus est; imo non diu vivere permissus est, sed tarde mori compulsus est. In illa ergo longa morte, in illis tormentis, quia bene manducaverat et bene biberat, tanquam illa esca saginatus et illo calice ebrius, tormenta non sensit. Ibi enim erat qui dixit, Spiritus est qui vivificat. Caro enim ardebat, sed spiritus animam vegetabat. Non cessit, et in regnum successit. Dixerat autem illi Xystus martyr sanctus, cujus diem quinto ab hinc retro die celebravimus: « Noli moerere, fili. » Episcopus enim erat ille, iste diaconus. « Noli moerere inquit; sequeris me post triduum. » Triduum autem dixit medium inter diem passionis sancti Xysti, et diem hodiernae passionis sancti Laurentii. Triduum est medium. O consolatio! non ait, Noli moerere, fili; desinet persecutio, et securus eris: sed, Noli moerere; quo ego praecedo, tu sequeris; nec consecutio tua differtur: triduum medium erit, et mecum eris. Accepit oraculum, vicit diabolum, pervenit ad triumphum.