Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 95

St Augustine of Hippo (AD 354–430) · In Joannis evangelium tractatus CXXIV · PL 35, 1379–1976

95.1 Chapter XVI. 8–11 PL 35, 1870

1. The Lord, when promising that He would send the Holy Spirit, said, “When He is come, He will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment.” What does it mean? Is it that the Lord Jesus Christ did not reprove the world of sin, when He said, “If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin; but now they have no cloak for their sin”? And that no one may take it to his head to say that this applied properly to the Jews, and not to the world, did He not say in another place, “If ye were of the world, the world would love his own”? Did He not reprove it of righteousness, when He said, “O righteous Father, the world hath not known Thee”? And did He not reprove it of judgment when He declared that He would say to those on the left hand, “Depart ye into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels”? And many other passages are to be found in the holy evangel, where Christ reproveth the world of these things. Why is it, then, He attributeth this to the Holy Spirit, as if it were His proper prerogative? Is it that, because Christ spake only among the nation of the Jews, He does not appear to have reproved the world, inasmuch as one may be understood to be reproved who actually hears the reprover; while the Holy Spirit, who was in His disciples when scattered throughout the whole world, is to be understood as having reproved not one nation, but the world? For mark what He said to them when about to ascend into heaven: “It is not for you to know the times or the moments, which the Father hath put in His own power. But ye shall receive the power of the Holy Spirit, that cometh upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me in Jerusalem, and in all Judea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth.” Surely this is to reprove the world. But would any one venture to say that the Holy Spirit reproveth the world through the disciples of Christ, and that Christ Himself doth not, when the apostle exclaims, “Would ye receive a proof of Him that speaketh in me, namely Christ?” And so those, surely, whom the Holy Spirit reproveth, Christ reproveth likewise. But in my opinion, because there was to be shed abroad in their hearts by the Holy Spirit that love which casteth out the fear, that might have hindered them from venturing to reprove the world which bristled with persecutions, therefore it was that He said, “He shall reprove the world:” as if He would have said, He shall shed abroad love in your hearts, and, having your fear thereby expelled, ye shall have freedom to reprove. We have frequently said, however, that the operations of the Trinity are inseparable; but the Persons needed to be set forth one by one, that not only without separating Them, but also without confounding Them together, we may have a right understanding both of Their Unity and Trinity.

Promittens Dominus missurum se Spiritum sanctum, Cum venerit, inquit, ille arguet mundum de peccato, et de justitia, et de judicio. Quid est hoc? Numquidnam Dominus Christus non arguit mundum de peccato, cum ait: Si non venissem, et locutus eis fuissem, peccatum non haberent; nunc autem excusationem non habent de peccato suo? Sed ne quis forte dicat hoc ad Judaeos proprie pertinere, non ad mundum; nonne ait alio loco: Si de mundo essetis, mundus quod suum esset diligeret ? Numquid non arguit de justitia, ubi ait: Pater juste, mundus te non cognovit ? Numquid non arguit de judicio, ubi se ait sinistris esse dicturum: Ite in ignem aeternum, qui paratus est diabolo et angelis ejus ? Et multa alia reperiuntur in sancto Evangelio, ubi de his Christus arguit mundum. Quid est ergo quod tanquam proprie tribuit hoc Spiritui sancto? An forte, quia Christus in Judaeorum tantum gente locutus est, mundum non videtur arguisse, ut ille intelligatur argui qui audit arguentem? Spiritus autem sanctus in discipulis ejus toto orbe diffusis, non unam gentem intelligitur arguisse, sed mundum. Nam hoc illis ait ascensurus in coelum: Non est vestrum scire tempora vel momenta, quae Pater posuit in sua potestate: sed accipietis virtutem Spiritus sancti supervenientis in vos, et eritis mihi testes in Jerusalem, et in tota Judaea, et in Samaria, et usque in fines terrae . Hoc est arguere mundum. Sed quis audeat dicere quod per discipulos Christi arguit mundum Spiritus sanctus, et non arguat ipse Christus; cum clamet Apostolus, An vultis experimentum accipere ejus qui in me loquitur Christus ? Quos itaque arguit Spiritus sanctus, arguit utique et Christus. Sed quantum mihi videtur, quia per Spiritum sanctum diffundenda erat charitas in cordibus eorum , quae foras mittit timorem , quo impediri possent ne arguere mundum qui persecutionibus fremebat, auderent; propterea dixit, Ille arguet mundum: tanquam diceret, Ille diffundet in cordibus vestris charitatem; sic enim timore depulso, arguendi habebitis libertatem. Saepe autem diximus inseparabilia opera esse Trinitatis ; sed singillatim commendandas fuisse personas, ut non solum sine separatione, verum etiam sine confusione et unitas intelligatur et Trinitas.

95.2 PL 35, 1871

2. He next explains what He has said “of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment.” “Of sin indeed,” He says, “because they have believed not on me.” For this sin, as if it were the only one, He has put before the others; because with the continuance of this one, all others are retained, and in the removal of this, the others are remitted. “But of righteousness,” He adds, “because I go to the Father, and ye shall see me no more.” And here we have to consider in the first place, if any one is rightly reproved of sin, how he may also be rightly reproved of righteousness. For if a sinner ought to be reproved just because he is a sinner, will any one imagine that a righteous man is also to be reproved because he is righteous? Surely not. For if at any time a righteous man also is reproved, he is rightly reproved on this account, that, according to Scripture, “There is not a just man upon earth, that doeth good, and sinneth not.” And accordingly, when a righteous man is reproved, he is reproved of sin, and not of righteousness. Since in that divine utterance also, where we read, “Be not made righteous over-much,” there is notice taken, not of the righteousness of the wise man, but of the pride of the presumptuous. The man, therefore, that becomes “righteous over-much,” by that very excess becomes unrighteous. For he makes himself righteous over-much who says that he has no sin, or who imagines that he is made righteous, not by the grace of God, but by the sufficiency of his own will: nor is he righteous through living righteously, but is rather self-inflated with the imagination of being what he is not. By what means, then, is the world to be reproved of righteousness, if not by the righteousness of believers? Accordingly, it is convinced of sin, because it believeth not on Christ; and it is convinced of the righteousness of those who do believe. For the very comparison with believers is itself a reproving of unbelievers. And this the exposition itself sufficiently indicates. For in wishing to open up what He has said, He adds, “Of righteousness, because I go to the Father, and ye shall see me no more.” He does not say, And they shall see me no more; that is, those of whom He had said, “because they have believed not on me.” Of them He spake, when expounding what He denominated sin, in the words, “because they have believed not on me;” but when expounding what He called righteousness, whereof the world is convicted, He turned to those to whom He was speaking, and said, “because I go to the Father, and ye shall see me no more.” Wherefore it is of its own sins, but of others’ righteousness, that the world is convicted, just as darkness is reproved by the light: “For all things,” says the apostle, “that are reproved, are made manifest by the light.” For the magnitude of the evil chargeable on those who do not believe, may be made apparent not only by itself, but also by the goodness of those who do believe. And since the cry of unbelievers usually is, How can we believe what we do not see? so the righteousness of unbelievers just required this very definition, “Because I go to the Father, and ye shall see me no more.” For blessed are they who see not, and yet do believe. For of those also who saw Christ, the faith in Him that met with commendation was not that they believed what they saw, namely, the Son of man; but that they believed what they did not see, namely, the Son of God. But after His servant-form was itself also withdrawn from their view, then in every respect was the word truly fulfilled, “The just liveth by faith.” For “faith,” according to the definition in the Epistle to the Hebrews, “is the confidence of those that hope, the conviction of things that are not seen.”

Exponit deinde quid dixerit de peccato, et de justitia et de judicio. De peccato quidem, inquit, quia non crediderunt in me. Hoc enim peccatum quasi solum sit, prae caeteris posuit; quia hoc manente caetera detinentur, et hoc discedente caetera remittuntur. De justitia vero, inquit, quia ad Patrem vado, et jam non videbitis me. Hic primo videndum est, si recte quisque arguitur de peccato, quomodo recte arguatur et de justitia. Numquid enim si arguendus est peccator propterea quia peccator est, arguendum putabit quisquam et justum propterea quia justus est? Absit. Nam et si aliquando justus arguitur, ideo recte arguitur, quia, sicut scriptum est, Non est justus in terra qui faciet bonum, et non peccabit. Quocirca etiam cum justus arguitur, de peccato arguitur, non de justitia. Quoniam et in illo quod legimus divinitus dictum, Noli effici justus multum ; non est notata justitia sapientis, sed superbia praesumentis. Qui ergo fit multum justus, ipso nimio fit injustus. Multum enim se facit justum, qui dicit se non habere peccatum; aut qui se putat non gratia Dei, sed sua voluntate sufficiente effici justum; nec recte vivendo justus est, sed potius inflatus, putando se esse quod non est. Quo pacto igitur mundus arguendus est de justitia, nisi de justitia credentium? Arguitur itaque de peccato, quia in Christum non credit; et arguitur de justitia eorum qui credunt. Ipsa quippe fidelium comparatio, infidelium est vituperatio. Hoc et ipsa expositio satis indicat. Volens enim aperire quid dixerit, De justitia vero, inquit, quia ad Patrem vado, et jam non videbitis me. Non ait, Et jam non videbunt me; de quibus dixerat, quia non crediderunt in me. Sed peccatum quid vocaret exponens, de illis locutus est dicens, quia non crediderunt in me: exponens autem quam diceret justitiam, de qua mundus arguitur, ad ipsos quibus loquebatur, se convertit, atque ait, Quia ad Patrem vado, et jam non videbitis me. Quapropter mundus de peccato quidem suo, de justitia vero arguitur aliena, sicut arguuntur de lumine tenebrae: Omnia enim quae arguuntur, ait Apostolus, a lumine manifestantur . Quantum enim malum sit eorum qui non credunt, non solum per seipsum, verum etiam ex bono potest eorum apparere qui credunt. Et quoniam ista vox infidelium esse consuevit, Quomodo credimus quod non videmus? ideo credentium justitiam sic oportuit definiri, Quia ad Patrem vado, et jam non videbitis me. Beati enim qui non vident, et credunt . Nam et qui viderunt Christum, non in eo laudata est fides eorum, quia credebant quod videbant, id est Filium hominis; sed quia credebant, quod non videbant, id est Filium Dei. Cum vero et ipsa forma servi subtracta eorum esset aspectibus, tum vero ex omni parte impletum est, Justus ex fide vivit . Est enim fides, sicut in Epistola quae ad Hebraeos est definitur, sperantium substantia, convictio rerum quae non videntur.

95.3 PL 35, 1872

3. But how are we to understand, “Ye shall see me no more”? For He saith not, I go to the Father, and ye shall not see me, so as to be understood as referring to the interval of time when He would not be seen, whether short or long, but at all events terminable; but in saying, “Ye shall see me no more,” as if a truth announced beforehand that they would never see Christ in all time coming. Is this the righteousness we speak of, never to see Christ, and yet to believe on Him; seeing that the faith whereby the just liveth is commended on the very ground of believing that the Christ whom it seeth not meanwhile, it shall see some day? Once more, in reference to this righteousness, are we to say that the Apostle Paul was not righteous when confessing that He had seen Christ after His ascension into heaven, which was undoubtedly the time of which He had already said, “Ye shall see me no more”? Was Stephen, that hero of surpassing renown, not righteous in the spirit of this righteousness, who, when they were stoning him, exclaimed, “Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of man standing on the right hand of God”? What, then, is meant by “I go to the Father, and ye shall see me no more,” but just this, As I am while with you now? For at that time He was still mortal in the likeness of sinful flesh. He could suffer hunger and thirst, be wearied, and sleep; and this Christ, that is, Christ in such a condition, they were no more to see after He had passed from this world to the Father; and such, also, is the righteousness of faith, whereof the apostle says, “Though we have known Christ after the flesh, yet now henceforth know we Him no more.” This, then, He says, will be your righteousness whereof the world shall be reproved, “because I go to the Father, and ye shall see me no more:” seeing that ye shall believe in me as in one whom ye shall not see; and when ye shall see me as I shall be then, ye shall not see me as I am while with you meanwhile; ye shall not see me in my humility, but in my exaltation; nor in my mortality, but in my eternity; nor at the bar, but on the throne of judgment: and by this faith of yours, in other words, your righteousness, the Holy Spirit will reprove an unbelieving world.

Sed quid est, Jam non videbitis me? Non enim ait, Ad Patrem vado, et non videbitis me; ut temporis intervallum quo non videbitur, significasse intelligeretur, sive breve, sive longum, tamen utique terminatum: sed dicendo, Jam non videbitis me, velut nunquam eos de caetero visuros Christum, veritas praenuntiavit. Haeccine justitia est nunquam Christum videre, et in eum tamen credere; cum propterea laudetur fides ex qua justus vivit, quoniam credit, quem modo non videt Christum, se aliquando esse visurum? Postremo secundum hanc justitiam, numquid dicturi sumus Paulum apostolum non fuisse justum, confitentem se Christum vidisse post ascensionem ejus in coelum , de quo utique jam tempore dixerat, Jam non videbitis me? Numquid secundum hanc justitiam justus non erat gloriosissimus Stephanus, qui cum lapidaretur, ait: Ecce video coelum apertum, et Filium hominis stantem ad dexteram Dei ? Quid ergo est, Ad Patrem vado, et jam non videbitis me; nisi, quomodo sum, cum vobiscum sum? Tunc enim adhuc erat mortalis in similitudine carnis peccati , qui esurire poterat ac sitire, fatigari atque dormire: hunc ergo Christum, id est talem Christum, cum transisset de hoc mundo ad Patrem, non erant jam visuri; et ipsa est justitia fidei, de qua dicit Apostolus, Etsi noveramus Christum secundum carnem, sed nunc jam non novimus . Erit itaque, inquit, vestra justitia, qua mundus arguetur, quia vado ad Patrem, et jam non videbitis me: quoniam in eum quem non videbitis credetis in me: et quando me videbitis, quod tunc ero, non videbitis me quod sum vobiscum modo; non videbitis humilem, sed excelsum; non videbitis mortalem, sed sempiternum; non videbitis judicandum, sed judicaturum: et de hac fide vestra, id est justitia vestra, arguet Spiritus sanctus incredulum mundum.

95.4 PL 35, 1872

4. He will also reprove it “of judgment, because the prince of this world is judged.” Who is this, save he of whom He saith in another place, “Behold, the prince of the world cometh, and shall find nothing in me;” that is, nothing within his jurisdiction, nothing belonging to him; in fact, no sin at all? For thereby is the devil the prince of the world. For it is not of the heavens and of the earth, and of all that is in them, that the devil is prince, in the sense in which the world is to be understood, when it is said, “And the world was made by Him;” but the devil is prince of that world, whereof in the same passage He immediately afterwards subjoins the words, “And the world knew Him not;” that is, unbelieving men, wherewith the world through its utmost extent is filled: among whom the believing world groaneth, which He, who made the world, chose out of the world; and of whom He saith Himself, “The Son of man came not to judge the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.” He is the judge by whom the world is condemned, the helper whereby the world is saved: for just as a tree is full of foliage and fruit, or a field of chaff and wheat, so is the world full of believers and unbelievers. Therefore the prince of this world, that is, the prince of the darkness thereof, or of unbelievers, out of whose hands that world is rescued, to which it is said, “Ye were at one time darkness, but now are ye light in the Lord:” the prince of this world, of whom He elsewhere saith, “Now is the prince of this world cast out,” is assuredly judged, inas much as he is irrevocably destined to the judgment of everlasting fire. And so of this judgment, by which the prince of the world is judged, is the world reproved by the Holy Spirit; for it is judged along with its prince, whom it imitates in its own pride and impiety. “For if God,” in the words of the Apostle Peter, “spared not the angels that sinned, but thrust them into prisons of infernal darkness, and gave them up to be reserved for punishment in the judgment,” how is the world otherwise than reproved of this judgment by the Holy Spirit, when it is in the Holy Spirit that the apostle so speaketh? Let men, therefore, believe in Christ, that they be not convicted of the sin of their own unbelief, whereby all sins are retained: let them make their way into the number of believers, that they be not convicted of the righteousness of those, whom, as justified, they fail to imitate: let them beware of that future judgment, that they be not judged with the prince of the world, whom, judged as he is, they continue to imitate. For the unbending pride of mortals can have no thought of being spared itself, as it is thus called to think with terror of the punishment that overtook the pride of angels.

Arguet etiam de judicio, quia princeps hujus mundi judicatus est. Quis est iste, nisi de quo ait alio loco, Ecce venit princeps mundi, et in me nihil inveniet ; id est, nihil juris sui, nihil quod ad eum pertineat, nullum scilicet omnino peccatum? Per hoc enim est diabolus princeps mundi. Non enim coeli et terrae et omnium quae in eis sunt, est diabolus princeps, qua significatione intelligitur mundus, ubi dictum est, Et mundus per eum factus est: sed mundi est diabolus princeps, de quo mundo ibi continuo subjungit atque ait, Et mundus eum non cognovit , hoc est homines infideles, quibus toto orbe terrarum mundus est plenus: inter quos gemit fidelis mundus, quem de mundo elegit, per quem factus est mundus; de quo ipse dicit, Non venit Filius hominis ut judicet mundum, sed ut salvetur mundus per ipsum . Mundus eo judicante damnatur, mundus eo subveniente salvatur: quoniam sicut arbor foliis et pomis, sicut area paleis et frumentis, ita infidelibus et fidelibus plenus est mundus. Princeps ergo mundi hujus, hoc est princeps tenebrarum harum, id est infidelium; de quibus eruitur mundus, quibus dicitur, Fuistis aliquando tenebrae; nunc autem lux in Domino : princeps mundi hujus de quo alibi dicit, Nunc princeps mundi hujus missus est foras , utique judicatus est; quoniam judicio ignis aeterni irrevocabiliter destinatus est. Et de hoc itaque judicio quo princeps judicatus est mundi, arguitur a Spiritu sancto mundus; quoniam cum suo principe judicatur, quem superbus atque impius imitatur. Si enim Deus, sicut dicit apostolus Petrus, peccantibus angelis non pepercit, sed carceribus caliginis inferi retrudens tradidit in judicio puniendos servari ; quomodo non a Spiritu sancto de hoc judicio mundus arguitur, quando in Spiritu sancto haec loquitur Apostolus? Credant itaque homines in Christum, ne arguantur de peccato infidelitatis suae, quo peccata omnia detinentur: transeant in numerum fidelium, ne arguantur de justitia eorum, quos justificatos non imitantur: caveant futurum judicium, ne cum mundi principe judicentur, quem judicatum imitantur. Etenim ne sibi existimet parci superbia dura mortalium, de superborum supplicio terrenda est angelorum.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Save for later

Enter your email and we will send you a sign-in link. No password. What you save (articles, verses, chapters, documents) follows you to any device.