Sermons on Selected Lessons of the New Testament 62

St Augustine of Hippo (AD 354–430) · Sermones de Scripturis · PL 38, 332–799

62.0 On the words of the Gospel, Luke xiv. 16, ‘A certain man made a great supper,’ etc PL 38, 643

[XCII. Ben.]

On the words of the Gospel, Luke xiv. 16, “A certain man made a great supper,” etc.

Delivered in the basilica Restituta.

62.1 On the words of the Gospel, Luke xiv. 16, ‘A certain man made a great supper,’ etc PL 38, 643

1. Holy lessons have been set forth before us, to which we should both give ear, and upon which by the Lord’s help I would deliver some observations. In the Apostolic lesson thanks are rendered unto the Lord for the faith of the Gentiles, of course, because it was His work. In the Psalm we have said, “O God of hosts, turn us, and show us Thy Face, and we shall be saved.” In the Gospel we have been called to a supper; yea, rather others have been called, we not called, but led; not only led, but even forced. For so have we heard, that “a certain Man made a great supper.” Who is this Man, but “the Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus”? He sent that those who had been invited might come, for the hour was now come, that they should come. Who are they who had been invited, but those who had been called by the Prophets who were sent before? When? Of old, ever since the Prophets were sent, they invited to Christ’s supper. They were sent then to the people of Israel. Often were they sent, often did they call men, to come at the hour of supper. But they received those who invited them, refused the supper. What means “they received those who invited them, refused the supper”? They read the Prophets and killed Christ. But when they killed Him, then though they knew it not, they prepared a Supper for us. When the Supper was now prepared, when Christ had been offered up, when the Supper of the Lord, which the faithful know, had been set forth after the resurrection of Christ, and established by His Hands and Mouth, were the Apostles sent to them, to whom the Prophets had been sent before. “Come ye to the supper.”

Judaei ad coenam invitati, nos ducti et coacti. Lectiones sanctae propositae sunt, et quas audiamus, et de quibus aliquid sermonis, adjuvante Domino, proferamus. In lectione apostolica gratiae aguntur Domino de fide Gentium, utique ideo, quia ipse fecit. In Psalmo diximus: Deus virtutum, converte nos, et ostende faciem tuam, et salvi erimus . In Evangelio, ad coenam vocati sumus: imo alii vocati, nos non vocati, sed ducti; non solum ducti, sed etiam coacti. Sic enim audivimus, quia Homo quidam fecit coenam magnam. Quis est iste homo, nisi mediator Dei et hominum homo Christus Jesus ? Misit ut venirent invitati, quia hora jam venerat, ut venirent. Qui sunt invitati, nisi per praemissos vocati Prophetas? Quando? Olim ex quo mittuntur Prophetae, invitant ad coenam Christi. Mittuntur ergo ad populum Israel. Saepe missi sunt, saepe vocaverunt, ut ad horam coenae venirent. Illi autem invitantes acceperunt, coenam repudiaverunt. Quid est, Invitantes acceperunt, coenam repudiaverunt? Prophetas legerunt, et Christum occiderunt. Sed quando occiderunt, tunc nobis coenam nescientes praeparaverunt. Parata jam coena, immolato Christo, post resurrectionem Christi commendata quam sciunt fideles, coena Domini, ejusque manibus et ore firmata, missi sunt Apostoli, ad quos missi fuerant ante Prophetae. Venite ad coenam.

62.2 PL 38, 643

2. They who would not come made excuses. And how did they excuse themselves? There were three excuses: “One said, I have bought a farm, and I go to see it; have me excused. Another said, I have bought five pairs of oxen, and I go to prove them; I pray thee have me excused. A third said, I have married a wife, have me excused; I cannot come.” Do we suppose that these are not the excuses, which hinder all men, who decline to come to this supper? Let us look into them, discuss, find them out; but only that we may beware. In the purchase of the farm, the spirit of domination is marked out; therefore pride is rebuked. For men are delighted to have a farm, to hold, to possess it, to have men in it under them, to have dominion. An evil vice, the first vice. For the first man wished to have dominion, in that he would not that any should have dominion over him. What is to have dominion, but to take pleasure in one’s own power? There is a greater power, let us submit ourselves to it, that we may be able to be safe. “I have bought a farm, have me excused.” Having discovered pride, he would not come.

Tres excusationes venire nolentium. Villa empta, dominatio superba. Excusaverunt qui venire noluerunt. Et excusaverunt, quomodo? Tres fuerunt excusationes: Unus dixit, Villam emi, eo videre illam: habe me excusatum. Alius dixit, Juga boum emi quinque, et eo probare illa: rogo te habe me excusatum. Tertius dixit, Uxorem duxi, habe me excusatum: venire non possum. Putamus non istae sunt excusationes, quae impediunt omnes homines, qui ad istam coenam venire detrectant? Quaeramus eas, discutiamus, inveniamus: sed ut caveamus. In villa empta, dominatio notatur: ergo superbia castigatur. Habere enim villam, tenere, possidere, homines sibi in illa subdere, dominari delectat. Vitium malum, vitium primum. Primus enim homo dominari voluit, qui dominum habere noluit. Quid est dominari, nisi propria potestate gaudere? Est major potestas, illi subdamur, ut tuti esse valeamus. Villam emi, habe me excusatum. Inventa superbia, venire noluit.

62.3 PL 38, 644

3. “Another said, I have bought five pairs of oxen.” Would it not have been enough, “I have bought oxen”? Something beyond doubt there is, which by its very obscurity challenges us to seek out, and understand; and in that it is shut, He exhorteth us to knock. The five pairs of oxen are the senses of this body. There are numbered five senses of this body, as is known to all; and they who, it may be, do not consider it, will doubtless perceive it on being reminded of it. There are then found to be five senses of this body. In the eyes is the sight, the hearing in the ears, the smell in the nose, the taste in the mouth, the touch in all the members. We have perception of white and black, and things coloured in whatever way, light and dark, by the sight. Harsh and musical sounds, we have perception of by the hearing. Of sweet and offensive smells, we have perception by the smell. Of things sweet and bitter by the taste. Of things hard and soft, smooth and rough, warm and cold, heavy and light, by the touch. They are five, and they are pairs. Now that they are pairs, is seen most easily in the case of the three first senses. There are two eyes, two ears, two nostrils; see three pairs. In the mouth, that is in the sense of taste, a certain doubling is found, because nothing affects the taste, unless it is touched by the tongue and the palate. The pleasure of the flesh which pertains to the touch, has this doubling in a less obvious way. For there is both an outer and an inner touch. And so it too is double. Why are they called pairs of oxen? Because by these senses of the body, earthly things are sought for. For oxen turn up the earth. So there are men far off from faith, given up to earthly things, occupied in the things of the flesh; who will not believe anything but what they attain to by the five senses of their body. In those five senses do they lay down for themselves the rules of their whole will. “I will not believe,” says one, “anything but what I see. See, here is what I know, and am sure of. Such a thing is white, or black, or round, or square, or coloured so and so; this I know, am sensible of, have a hold of; nature itself teaches it me. I am not forced to believe what you cannot show me. Or it is a voice: I perceive that it is a voice; it sings well, it sings ill, it is sweet, it is harsh. I know, I know this, it has come to me. There is a good or a bad smell: I know, I perceive it. This is sweet, this is bitter; this is salt, this insipid. I know not what you would tell me more. By the touch I know what is hard, what is soft; what is smooth, what is rough; what is warm, and what cold. What more would you show me?”

Quinque juga boum, curiositas quinque sensuum. Alius dixit, Quinque juga boum emi. Nonne sufficeret, Boves emi? Aliquid procul dubio est, quod nos ad quaerendum et intelligendum obscuritate sui provocat: et quia clausum est, ut pulsemus, hortatur. Quinque juga boum, sensus carnis hujus. Quinque numerantur sensus carnis hujus, quod omnibus notum est; et qui forte non advertunt, commoniti sine dubio recognoscunt. Sensus ergo carnis hujus quinque inveniuntur. In oculis visus est, auditus in auribus, odoratus in naribus, gustatus in faucibus, tactus in omnibus membris. Alba et nigra et quoquo modo colorata, lucida et obscura videndo sentimus. Rauca et canora, audiendo sentimus. Suave olentia et grave olentia, odorando sentimus. Dulcia et amara, gustando sentimus. Dura et mollia, lenia et aspera, calida et frigida, gravia et levia, tangendo sentimus. Quinque sunt, et juga sunt. Sed quia juga sunt, in tribus prioribus sensibus facilius apparet. Duo sunt oculi, duae aures, geminae nares: ecce tria juga. In faucibus, id est, sensu gustandi, geminatio quaedam invenitur, quia nihil gustando sapit, nisi lingua et palato tangatur. Voluptas carnis quae ad tactum pertinet, occultius geminatur. Est enim et forinsecus et intrinsecus. Ergo et ipsa gemina est. Quare boum dicuntur juga? Quia per sensus istos carnis terrena requiruntur. Boves enim terram versant. Sunt autem homines remoti a fide, terrenis dediti, carnalibus occupati: nolunt credere aliquid, nisi ad quod sui corporis sensu quinquepartito perveniunt. In eis quinque sensibus totius voluntatis sibi regulas ponunt. Non, inquit, credo ego, nisi quod video. Ecce quod novi, ecce quod scio. Album est, nigrum est, rotundum est, quadratum est, sic vel sic coloratum est: novi, sentio, teneo; natura ipsa me docet. Non cogor credere quod mihi non potes ostendere. Vox est: sentio, quia vox est; bene cantat, male cantat, suavis est, rauca est: novi, scio, pervenit ad me. Bene olet, male olet: scio, sentio. Hoc dulce est, hoc amarum; hoc salsum, hoc fatuum. Quid mihi plus dicas nescio. Tangendo novi quid durum est, quid molle sit; quid lene sit, quid asperum sit; quid caleat, quid frigeat. Quid mihi plus demonstraturus es?

62.4 PL 38, 645

4. By such an impediment was our Apostle Thomas held back, who as to the Lord Christ, the resurrection that is of Christ, would not believe even his own eyes only. “Unless,” says he, “I put my fingers into the places of the nails and wounds, and unless I put my hand into His side, I will not believe.” And the Lord who could have risen again without any vestige of a wound, kept the scars, that they might be touched by the doubting Apostle, and the wounds of his heart be healed. And yet as designing to call to His supper others, against the excuse of “the five pairs of oxen,” He said, “Blessed they who do not see, and believe.” We, my Brethren, who have been called to this supper, have not been kept back by “these five pairs.” For we have not in this age desired to see the Face of the Lord’s Body, nor have we longed to hear the Voice proceeding out of the mouth of that Body; we have not sought in Him for any passing odour. A certain “woman anointed Him with most costly ointment,” that “house was filled with the odour;” but we were not there; lo, we did not smell, yet we believe. He gave to the disciples the Supper consecrated by His Own Hands; but we did not sit down at that Feast, and yet we daily eat this same Supper by faith. And do not think it strange that in that supper which He gave with His Own Hand, one was present without faith: the faith that appeared, afterwards was more than a compensation for that faithlessness then. Paul was not there who believed, Judas was there who betrayed. How many now too in this same Supper, though they saw not then that table, nor beheld with their eyes, nor tasted with their mouths, the bread which the Lord took in His Hands, yet because it is the same as is now prepared, how many now also in this same Supper, “eat and drink judgment to themselves”?

Impedimentum fidei. Coena manibus Domini consecrata. Tali impedimento tenebatur apostolus noster Thomas, qui de Domino Christo, id est, de Christi resurrectione nec solis oculis credere voluit. Nisi misero, inquit, digitos meos in clavorum et vulnerum loca, et nisi manum meam in latus ejus misero, non credam. Et Dominus qui posset sine ullo vestigio vulneris resurgere, servavit cicatrices, quae a dubitante tangerentur, et cordis vulnera sanarentur. Et tamen vocaturus ad coenam contra excusationem quinque jugorum boum: Beati, inquit, qui non vident, et credunt . Nos, fratres mei, ad coenam vocati, ab istis quinque jugis non sumus impediti. Non enim faciem carnis Domini videre in hoc tempore concupivimus, aut vocem ex ore carnis illius procedentem auribus admittere desideravimus: nullum in illo temporalem odorem quaesivimus. Perfudit eum quaedam mulier pretiosissimo unguento, domus illa odore impleta est : sed nos ibi non fuimus; ecce non olfecimus, et credimus. Coenam manibus suis consecratam discipulis dedit: sed nos in illo convivio non discubuimus; et tamen ipsam coenam fide quotidie manducamus. Nec magnum putetis in illa coena, quam suis manibus dedit, sine fide interfuisse: melior exstitit fides postea, quam tunc perfidia. Non ibi fuit Paulus qui credidit: ibi fuit Judas qui tradidit. Quam multi et modo in ipsa coena, quamvis illam tunc mensam non viderint, nec panem quem Dominus gestavit in manibus, oculis suis aspexerint, vel faucibus gustaverint; tamen quia ipsa est quae nunc praeparatur, quam multi etiam nunc in ipsa coena judicium sibi manducant et bibunt ?

62.5 PL 38, 645

5. But whence arose an occasion, so to say, to the Lord, to speak of this supper? One of them that sat at meat with Him (for He was at a feast, whither He had been invited), had said, “Blessed are they who eat bread in the kingdom of God.” He sighed as though after distant things, and the Bread Himself was sitting down before him. Who is the Bread of the kingdom of God, but He who saith, “I am the Living Bread which came down from heaven”? Do not get thy mouth ready, but thine heart. On this occasion it was that the parable of this supper was set forth. Lo, we believe in Christ, we receive Him with faith. In receiving Him we know what to think of. We receive but little, and we are nourished in heart. It is not then what is seen, but what is believed, that feeds us. Therefore we too have not sought for that outward sense; nor have we said, “Let them believe who have seen with their eyes, and handled with their hands the Lord Himself after His resurrection, if what is said be true; we do not touch Him, why should we believe?” If we were to entertain such thoughts, we should be kept back from the supper by those “five pairs of oxen.” That ye may know, Brethren, that not the gratification of these five senses, which softens and ministers pleasure, but a kind of curiosity was denoted, He did not say, “‘I have bought five pairs of oxen,’ and I go to feed them;” but, “I go to prove them.” He who wishes to “prove” by “the pairs of oxen,” does not wish to be in doubt, just as St. Thomas by these “pairs” did not wish to be in doubt. “Let me see, let me touch, let me put in my fingers.” “‘Behold,’ saith the Lord, ‘put in thy fingers along My Side, and be not unbelieving.’ For thy sake have I been slain; at the place which thou wishest to touch, have I shed My Blood, that I might redeem thee; and dost thou still doubt of Me, unless thou touch Me? Behold, this too I grant; behold, this too I show thee; touch, and believe; find out the place of My wound, heal the wound of thy doubting.”

Curiositate sensuum nihil opus est ad salutem. Unde autem tanquam occasio nata est Domino, ut de ista coena loqueretur? Dixerat unus de discumbentibus (in convivio enim erat, quo fuerat invitatus): Beati qui manducant panem in regno Dei. Quasi in longinqua iste suspirabat, et ipse panis ante illum discumbebat. Quis est panis de regno Dei, nisi qui dicit, Ego sum panis vivus, qui de coelo descendi ? Noli parare fauces, sed cor. Inde commendata est ista coena. Ecce credimus in Christum, cum fide accipimus. In accipiendo novimus quid cogitemus. Modicum accipimus, et in corde saginamur. Non ergo quod videtur, sed quod creditur, pascit. Non ergo etiam sensum illum externum quaesivimus; nec diximus, Crediderint qui Dominum ipsum resurgentem, si verum est quod dicitur, viderunt oculis, manibus palpaverunt: nos non tangimus, quare credimus? Si talia cogitaremus, quinque illis jugis boum a coena impediremur. Ut noveritis, fratres, istorum quinque sensuum, non delectationem, quae permulcet et ingerit voluptatem, sed curiositatem quamdam notatam fuisse, non ait, Quinque juga boum emi, eo pascere illa; sed, eo probare illa. Qui vult probare, per juga boum non vult dubitare, quomodo sanctus Thomas per juga noluit dubitare. Videam, tangam, digitos mittam. Ecce, inquit, digitos tuos mitte per latus meum, et noli esse incredulus. Occisus sum propter te: per locum quem vis tangere, sanguinem fudi, ut redimerem te; et adhuc dubitas de me, nisi tetigeris me? Ecce et hoc praesto, ecce et hoc exhibeo: tange et crede; inveni locum vulneris, sana vulnus dubitationis.

62.6 PL 38, 646

6. “The third said, I have married a wife.” This is the pleasure of the flesh, which is a hindrance to many: and I would that it were so only without, and not within! There are men who say, “There is no happiness for a man, if he have not the pleasures of the flesh.” These are they whom the Apostle censures, saying, “‘Let us eat and drink, for to-morrow we shall die.’ Who hath risen to this life from the other? Who hath ever told us what goes on there? We take away with us, what in the time present makes our happiness.” He that speaks thus, “has married a wife,” attaches himself to the flesh, places his delight in the pleasures of the flesh, excuses himself from the supper; let him look well to it that he die not by an inward famine. Attend to John, the holy Apostle and Evangelist; “Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world.” O ye who come to the Supper of the Lord, “Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world.” He did not say, “Have not;” but, “Love not.” Thou hast had, possessed, loved. The love of earthly things, is the bird-lime of the spirit’s wings. Lo, thou hast desired, thou hast stuck fast. “Who will give thee wings as of a dove?” When wilt thou fly, whither thou mayest in deed, seeing thou hast perversely wished to rest here, where thou hast to thy hurt stuck fast? “Love not the world,” is the divine trumpet. By the voice of this trumpet unceasingly is it proclaimed to the compass of the earth, and to the whole world, “Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. Whosoever loveth the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world, is the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the ambition of life.” He begins at the last with which the Gospel ends. He begins at that, at which the Gospel made an end. “The lust of the flesh, I have married a wife. The lust of the eyes, I have bought five pairs of oxen. The ambition of life, I have bought a farm.”

Uxor, voluptas carnis. Tertius dixit, Uxorem duxi. Ista voluptas est carnis, quae multos impedit: utinam foris, et non intus. Sunt homines qui dicunt: Non est homini bene, nisi cui adsunt carnis deliciae. Ipsi sunt quos notat Apostolus, dicentes: Manducemus et bibamus; cras enim moriemur . Quis huc inde surrexit? Quis nobis, quod ibi agitur, dixit? Hoc nobiscum tollimus, quod in hoc tempore bene est nobis. Qui hoc dicit, uxorem duxit, carnem amplexatur, carnis voluptatibus jucundatur, a coena excusatur: observet ne fame interiore moriatur. Attendite Joannem, sanctum apostolum et evangelistam: Nolite diligere mundum, nec ea quae in mundo sunt. O qui ad coenam Domini venitis, nolite diligere mundum, nec ea quae in mundo sunt. Non dixit, Nolite habere; sed, Nolite diligere. Habuisti, possedisti, dilexisti. Amor rerum terrenarum, viscum est spiritualium pennarum. Ecce concupisti, haesisti. Quis dabit tibi pennas sicut columbae? Quando volabis, ubi vere requiescas ? quando hic, ubi male haesisti, perverse requiescere voluisti. Nolite diligere mundum, tuba divina est. Continuo hujus tubae verbis orbi terrarum et universo dicitur mundo, Nolite diligere mundum, nec ea quae in mundo sunt. Quisquis dilexerit mundum, non est charitas Patris in illo. Quoniam omnia quae in mundo sunt, concupiscentia carnis sunt, et concupiscentia oculorum, et ambitio saeculi . Ab imo coepit, quo Evangelium terminavit. Inde ille coepit, ubi Evangelium terminum posuit. Concupiscentia carnis, Uxorem duxi. Concupiscentia oculorum, Quinque juga boum emi. Ambitio saeculi, Villam emi.

62.7 PL 38, 646

7. Now these senses are denoted by the mention of the eyes only, the whole by a part, because the pre-eminence in the five senses belongs to the eyes. Wherefore though sight belongs peculiarly to the eyes, we are accustomed to use the word “seeing” through all the five senses. How? In the first place, in relation to the eyes themselves we say; “See how white it is, look and see how white it is:” this has relation to the eyes. Hear and see how musical it is! Could we say conversely, “Hear and see how white it is”? This expression, “see,” runs through all the senses; whereas the distinguishing expression of the other senses does not in its turn run through it. “Mark and see how musical; smell and see how agreeable it is; taste and see how sweet it is; touch and see how soft it is.” And yet surely since they are senses, we should rather say thus; “Hear and be sensible how musical it is; smell and be sensible how agreeable it is; taste and be sensible how sweet it is; touch and be sensible how hot it is; handle and be sensible how smooth it is; handle and be sensible how soft it is.” But we say none of these. For thus the Lord Himself after His resurrection when He appeared to His disciples, and when though they saw Him they still wavered in faith supposing that they saw a spirit, said, “Why do ye doubt, and why do thoughts arise in your hearts? See My Hands and My Feet.” It is not enough to say, “See;” He saith, “Touch, and handle, and see.” “Look and see, handle and see; with the eyes alone see, and see by all the senses.” Because He was looking for the inner sense of faith, He offered Himself to the outward senses of the body. We have made no attainment in the Lord by these outward senses, we have heard with our ears, have believed with our heart; and this hearing not from His mouth, but from the mouth of His preachers, from their mouths who were already at the supper, and who by the pouring forth of what they there drunk in invited us.

Oculorum nomine caeteri sensus significati. Ideo autem a parte totum per solos oculos commemorati sunt isti sensus, quia oculorum est in quinque sensibus principatus. Propterea cum proprie ad oculos pertineat visus, ipsum videre per omnes quinque sensus solemus appellare. Quomodo? Primo quod ad ipsos oculos pertinet, dicis, Vide quam candidum est, intende et vide quam candidum est: hoc ad oculos pertinet. Audi et vide quam canorum est. Numquid conversim potes dicere: Audi et vide quam candidum est? Hoc quod dicitur, Vide, per omnes sensus currit: caeterorum autem sensuum proprietas non per se recurrit. Intende et vide quam canorum est: odora et vide quam suave est: gusta et vide quam dulce est: tange et vide quam molle est. Utique quoniam sensus sunt, sic potius diceremus: Audi et senti quam canorum est: odora et senti quam suave est: gusta et senti quam dulce est: tange et senti quam calidum est: palpa et senti quam lene est: palpa et senti quam molle est. Nihil horum. Nam et ipse Dominus post resurrectionem cum apparuit discipulis suis, cumque cernentes adhuc titubarent in fide, putantes se spiritum videre: Quid, inquit, dubitatis? et quare cogitationes ascendunt in cor vestrum? Videte manus meas et pedes meos. Et parum est, Videte: Tangite, inquit, et palpate et videte . Intendite et videte, palpate et videte: in solis oculis videte, in omnibus sensibus videte. Quia interiorem fidei sensum quaerebat, exterioribus corporis sensibus adjacebat. Nos nihil ab istis exterioribus sensibus in Domino carpsimus, auditu audivimus, corde credidimus: et ipsum auditum non ab illius ore, sed ab ore praedicatorum ejus, ab ore illorum qui jam coenabant, et nos ructuando invitabant.

62.8 PL 38, 647

8. Let us away then with vain and evil excuses, and come we to the supper by which we may be made fat within. Let not the puffing up of pride keep us back, let it not lift us up, nor unlawful curiosity scare us, and turn us away from God; let not the pleasure of the flesh hinder us from the pleasure of the heart. Let us come, and be filled. And who came but the beggars, the “maimed,” the “halt,” the “blind”? But there came not thither the rich, and the whole, who walked, as they thought, well, and saw acutely; who had great confidence in themselves, and were therefore in the more desperate case, in proportion as they were more proud. Let the beggars come, for He inviteth them, “who, though He was rich, for our sakes became poor, that we beggars through His poverty might be enriched.” Let the maimed come, “for they that are whole need not a physician, but they that are in evil case.” Let the halt come who may say to Him, “Set in order my steps in Thy paths.” Let the blind come who may say, “Enlighten mine eyes, that I may never sleep in death.” Such as these came at the hour, when those who had been first invited, had been rejected for their own excuses: they came at the hour, they entered in from the streets and lanes of the city. And the servant “who had been sent,” brought answer, “Lord, it is done as Thou hast commanded, and yet there is room.” “Go out,” saith He, “into the highways and hedges, and compel those whom thou shalt find to come in.” Whom thou shalt find wait not till they choose to come, compel them to come in. I have prepared a great supper, a great house, I cannot suffer any place to be vacant in it. The Gentiles came from the streets and lanes: let the heretics come from the hedges, here they shall find peace. For those who make hedges, their object is to make divisions. Let them be drawn away from the hedges, let them be plucked up from among the thorns. They have stuck fast in the hedges, they are unwilling to be compelled. Let us come in, they say, of our own good will. This is not the Lord’s order, “Compel them,” saith he, “to come in.” Let compulsion be found outside, the will arise within.

Ad coenam venire nemo cunctetur. Tollamus ergo de medio excusationes vanas et malas, et veniamus ad coenam, qua intrinsecus saginemur. Non nos impediat extollentia superbiae, non nos extollat, vel non nos terreat curiositas illicita, et avertat a Deo: non nos impediat voluptas carnis a voluptate cordis. Veniamus, et saginemur. Et qui venerunt, nisi mendici, debiles, claudi, caeci? Illic autem non venerunt divites, sani, quasi bene ambulantes, et acute cernentes; multum de se praesumentes, et ideo desperatiores, quanto superbiores. Veniant mendici, quia ille invitat qui propter nos pauper factus est, cum dives esset, ut illius paupertate mendici ditaremur . Veniant debiles: quia non est opus sanis medicus, sed male habentibus . Veniant claudi qui ei dicant: Compone gressus meos in semitis tuis . Veniant caeci qui dicant: Illumina oculos meos, ne unquam obdormiam in morte . Tales venerunt ad horam; illis prius invitatis, sua excusatione reprobatis: venerunt ad horam, intraverunt de plateis et vicis civitatis. Et respondit servus, qui missus erat, Domine, factum est ut jussisti, et adhuc locus est. Exi, inquit, in vias et sepes, et quos inveneris coge intrare. Quos inveneris, ut dignentur, noli exspectare; coge intrare. Magnam coenam, magnam domum paravi, non ibi patior locum vacare. Venerunt de plateis et vicis Gentes: veniant de sepibus haeretici, hic inveniunt pacem. Nam qui construunt sepes, divisiones quaerunt. Trahantur a sepibus, evellantur ab spinis. In sepibus haeserunt, cogi nolunt. Voluntate, inquiunt, nostra intremus. Non hoc Dominus imperavit: Coge, inquit, intrare. Foris inveniatur necessitas, nascitur intus voluntas.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Save for later

Enter your email and we will send you a sign-in link. No password. What you save (articles, verses, chapters, documents) follows you to any device.