Sermons on Selected Lessons of the New Testament 86

St Augustine of Hippo (AD 354–430) · Sermones de Scripturis · PL 38, 332–799

86.0 On the same lesson of the Gospel, John ix., on the giving sight to the man that was born blind PL 38, 750

[CXXXVI. Ben.]

On the same lesson of the Gospel, John ix., on the giving sight to the man that was born blind.

86.1 On the same lesson of the Gospel, John ix., on the giving sight to the man that was born blind PL 38, 750

1. We have heard the lesson of the Holy Gospel which we are in the habit of hearing; but it is a good thing to be reminded: good to refresh the memory from the lethargy of forgetfulness. And in fact this very old lesson has given us as much pleasure as if it were new. Christ gave sight to one blind from his birth; why do we marvel? Christ is the Saviour; by an act of mercy He made up that which He had not given in the womb. Now when He gave that man no eyes, it was no mistake of His surely; but a delay with a view to a miracle. You are saying, it may be, “Whence knowest thou this?” From Himself I have heard it; He just now said it; we heard it all together. For when His disciples asked Him, and said, “Lord, who did sin, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?” What answer He made, ye, as I did, heard. “Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents, but that the works of God should be made manifest in him.” Lo then wherefore it was that He delayed when He gave him no eyes. He did not give what He could give, He did not give what He knew He should give, when need was. Yet do not suppose, Brethren, that this man’s parents had no sin, or that he himself had not, when he was born, contracted original sin, for the remission of which sin infants are baptized unto remission of sins. But that blindness was not because of his parents’ sin, nor because of his own sin; “but that the works of God should be made manifest in him.” For we all when we were born contracted original sin: and yet we were not born blind. However enquire carefully, And we were born blind. For who was not born blind? blind, that is, in heart. But the Lord Jesus, for that He had created both, cured both.

Caeci nati illuminatio. Audivimus lectionem sancti Evangelii, quam solemus: sed bonum est commoneri; bonum est ab oblivionis veterno memoriam renovare. Denique vetustissima lectio, quasi nova, nos delectavit. Caecum a nativitate illuminavit Christus: quid miramini? Salvator est Christus: hoc reddidit beneficio, quod minus fecerat in utero. Quando autem ei oculos minus faciebat, non utique errabat; sed ad miraculum differebat. Dicitis forte: Unde scis? Ab ipso audivi: modo illud dixit; simul audivimus. Quando enim interrogaverunt eum discipuli ejus, et dixerunt, Domine, quis peccavit, iste aut parentes ejus, quoniam caecus natus est? quid respondit, mecum audistis: Neque hic peccavit, neque parentes ejus; sed ut ostendantur opera Dei in ipso. Ecce quare differebat, quando minus oculus faciebat. Non fecit, quod faceret; non fecit, quod facturum se esse sciebat, quando oportebat. Nec arbitremini, fratres, parentes ejus nullum habuisse peccatum, aut ipsum non, quando natus est, contraxisse originale peccatum, propter quod peccatum remittendum parvuli baptizantur in remissionem peccatorum. Sed caecitas illa non fuit propter peccatum parentum, non fuit propter peccatum ipsius; sed ut manifestarentur opera Dei in ipso. Omnes enim, quando nati sumus, peccatum originale traximus; et tamen non caeci nati sumus. Interroga diligenter: et caeci nati sumus. Quis enim non caecus natus est? sed in corde. Dominus autem Jesus, quia utrumque creaverat utrumque curavit.

86.2 PL 38, 751

2. With the eyes of faith ye have seen this man blind, ye have seen him too of blind seeing; but ye have heard him erring. Wherein this blind man erred, I will tell you; first, in that he thought Christ a prophet, and knew not that He was the Son of God. And then we have heard an answer of his entirely false; for he said, “We know that God heareth not sinners.” If God heareth not sinners, what hope have we? If God heareth not sinners, why do we pray, and publish the record of our sin by the beating of the breast? Where again is that Publican, who went up with the Pharisee into the temple and while the Pharisee was boasting, parading his own merits, he standing afar off, and with his eyes fastened on the ground, and beating his breast, was confessing his sins? And this man, who confessed his sins, went down from the temple justified rather than the other Pharisee. Assuredly then God doth hear sinners. But he who spake these words had not yet washed the face of the heart in Siloa. The sacrament had gone before on his eyes; but in the heart had not been yet effected the blessing of the grace. When did this blind man wash the face of his heart? When the Lord admitted him into Himself after he had been cast out by the Jews. For He found him, and said to him as we have heard; “Dost thou believe on the Son of God?” And he, “Who is He, Lord, that I may believe on Him?” With the eyes, it is true, he saw already; did he see already in the heart? No, not yet. Wait; he will see presently. Jesus answered him, “I that speak with thee am He.” Did he doubt? No, forthwith he washed his face. For he was speaking with That Siloa, “which is by interpretation, Sent.” Who is the Sent, but Christ? Who often bare witness, saying, “I do the will of My Father That sent Me.” He then was Himself the Siloa. The man approached blind in heart, he heard, believed, adored; washed the face, saw.

Caeci error, putantis peccatores non exaudiri. Vidistis caecum istum oculis fidei, vidistis etiam ex caeco videntem: sed audistis errantem. In quo errabat caecus iste, dico: primum quia Christum prophetam putabat, Dei Filium nesciebat. Deinde audivimus unam responsionem ipsius prorsus falsam: ait enim, Scimus quia peccatores Deus non exaudit. Si peccatores Deus non exaudit, quam spem habemus? Si peccatores Deus non exaudit, utquid oramus, et testimonium peccati nostri tunsione pectoris dicimus? Ubi est certe ille Publicanus, qui cum Pharisaeo ascendit in templum, et illo Pharisaeo jactante, ventilante merita sua, ille stans longe, et oculis fixis in terra, et tundens pectus suum, confitebatur peccata sua? Et descendit iste, qui confitebatur peccata sua, justificatus de templo, magis quam ille Pharisaeus . Certe peccatores Deus exaudit. Sed ille qui ista dixit, nondum laverat faciem cordis de Siloa. In oculis ejus praecesserat sacramentum: sed in corde nondum erat effectum gratiae beneficium. Quando lavit faciem cordis sui caecus iste? Quando eum Dominus foras missum a Judaeis, intromisit ad se. Invenit enim eum, et dixit ei, sicut audivimus: Tu credis in Filium Dei? Et ille: Quis est, Domine, ut credam in eum? Certe jam videbat oculis: jam corde? Nondum. Exspectate: modo videbit. Respondit ei Jesus: Ego sum, qui loquor tecum. Numquid dubitavit? Continuo faciem lavit. Loquebatur enim cum illo Siloa, quod interpretatur missus. Quis est missus, nisi Christus? Qui saepe testatus est dicens, Voluntatem facio Patris mei, qui me misit . Ergo ipse erat Siloa. Accessit corde caecus, audivit, credidit, adoravit: faciem lavit, vidit.

86.3 PL 38, 751

3. But they who cast him out continued blind, forasmuch as they cavilled at the Lord, that it was the sabbath when He made clay of the spittle, and anointed the eyes of the blind man. For when the Lord cured with a word, the Jews openly cavilled. For He did no work on the sabbath day, when He spake, and it was done. It was a manifest cavil; they cavilled at Him merely commanding, they cavilled at Him speaking; as if they did not themselves speak all the sabbath day. I might say that they do not speak not only on the sabbath, but on no day, forasmuch as they have kept back from the praises of the True God. Nevertheless, as I have said, brethren, it was a manifest cavil. The Lord said to a certain man, “Stretch forth thine hand;” he was made whole, and they cavilled for that He healed on the sabbath day. What did He do? what work did He do? what burden did He bear? But in this instance, the spitting on the ground, the making clay, and anointing the man’s eyes, is doing some work. Let no one doubt it, it was doing a work. The Lord did break the sabbath; but was not therefore guilty. What is that I have said, “He brake the sabbath”? He, the Light had come, He was removing the shadows. For the sabbath was enjoined by the Lord God, enjoined by Christ Himself, who was with the Father, when that Law was given; it was enjoined by Him, but in shadow of what was to come. “Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holy day, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days, which are a shadow of things to come.” He had now come whose coming these things announced. Why do the shadows delight us? Open your eyes, ye Jews; the Sun is present. “We know.” What do ye know, ye blind in heart? what know ye? “That this man is not of God, because he thus breaketh the sabbath day.” The sabbath, unhappy men, this very sabbath did Christ ordain, who ye say is not of God. Ye observe the sabbath in a carnal manner, ye have not the spittle of Christ. In this earth of the sabbath look also for the spittle of Christ, and ye will understand that by the sabbath Christ was prophesied. But ye, because ye have not the spittle of Christ in the earth upon your eyes, ye have not come unto Siloa, and have not washed the face, and have continued blind, blind to the good of this blind man, yea now no longer blind either in body or heart. He received clay with the spittle, his eyes were anointed, he came to Siloa, he washed his face, he believed on Christ, he saw, he continued not in that exceedingly fearful judgment; “For judgment I came into this world, that they which see not may see, and that they which see may be made blind.”

Judaeorum caecitas, calumniantium solvi sabbatum a Christo. Illi autem qui eum foras miserunt, caeci remanserunt, quandoquidem Domino calumniabantur, quia sabbatum erat, quando lutum fecit de sputo, et inunxit oculos caeci. Quando enim Dominus verbo curabat, aperte calumniabantur Judaei. Non enim sabbato operabatur aliquid, quando dicebat, et fiebat. Aperta calumnia erat: jubenti calumniabantur, loquenti calumniabantur; quasi ipsi per sabbatum non loquerentur. Possum dicere quia non solum per sabbatum, sed nullo die loquuntur, quoniam a veri Dei laudibus recesserunt. Tamen ut dixi, fratres, aperta calumnia erat. Dicebat Dominus homini, Extende manum tuam: fiebat sanus, et calumniabantur quia per sabbatum curabat . Quid fecit? quid operatus est? quod onus tulit? Sed modo spuere in terram, lutum facere, et homini oculos inungere, operari est. Nemo dubitet, operari erat. Dominus sabbatum solvebat: sed non ideo reus. Quid est quod dixi, Sabbatum solvebat? Lux ipse venerat, umbras removebat. Sabbatum enim a Domino Deo praeceptum est, ab ipso Christo praeceptum, qui cum Patre erat, quando Lex illa dabatur: ab ipso praeceptum est, sed in umbra futuri. Nemo ergo vos judicet in cibo, aut in potu, aut in parte diei festi, aut neomeniae, aut sabbatorum, quod est umbra futurorum . Venerat quem venturum ista nuntiabant. Quid delectant umbrae? Judaei, aperite oculos: sol praesens est. Nos scimus. Quid scitis, o corde caeci? quid scitis? Quia non est iste homo a Deo, qui sic solvit sabbatum. Sabbatum, miseri, sabbatum ipsum Christus praedicavit, quem dicitis non esse a Deo. Sabbatum carnaliter observatis, salivam Christi non habetis. Attendite in terra sabbati etiam salivam Christi, et intelligetis per sabbatum prophetatum Christum. Sed vos quia salivam Christi in terra super oculos vestros non habetis, ideo ad Siloam non venistis, et faciem non lavistis, et caeci remansistis; bono caeci ejus, imo jam non caeci nec carne, nec corde. Accepit in sputo lutum, inuncti sunt ejus oculi, accessit ad Siloam, lavit faciem, in Christum credidit, vidit, non remansit in illo judicio valde terribili: Ego in judicium veni in hunc mundum, ut qui non vident, videant; et qui vident, caeci fiant.

86.4 PL 38, 752

4. Exceeding alarm! “That they which see not may see:” Good. It is a Saviour’s office, a profession of healing power, “That they which see not may see.” But what, Lord, is that Thou hast added, “That they which see may be made blind”? If we understand, it is most true, most righteous. Yet what is, “They which see”? They are the Jews. Do they then see? According to their own words, they see; according to the truth, they do not see. What then is, “they see”? They think they see, they believe they see. For they believed they did see, when they maintained the Law against Christ. “We know;” therefore they see. What is “We know,” but we see? What is, “this Man is not of God, because He thus breaketh the sabbath day”? They see; they read what the Law said. For it was enjoined that whosoever should break the sabbath day, should be stoned. Therefore said they that He was not of God; but though seeing, they were blind to this, that for judgment He came into the world who is to be the Judge of quick and dead; why came He? “That they which see not may see:” that they who confess that they do not see, may be enlightened. “And that they which see may be made blind;” that is, that they who confess not their own blindness, may be the more hardened. And, in fact, “That they which see may be made blind,” has been fulfilled; the defenders of the Law, Doctors of the Law, the teachers of the Law, the understanders of the Law, crucified the Author of the Law. O blindness, this is that which “in part hath happened to Israel.” That Christ might be crucified, and the fulness of the Gentiles might come in, “blindness in part hath happened to Israel.” What is, “that they which see not may see”? That the fulness of the Gentiles might come in, “blindness in part hath happened to Israel.” The whole world lay in blindness; but He came, “that they which see not may see, and that they which see may be made blind.” He was disowned by the Jews, He was crucified by the Jews; of His Blood He made an eye-salve for the blind. They who boasted that they saw the light, being more hardened, being made blind, crucified the Light. What great blindness? They killed the Light, but the Light Crucified enlightened the blind.

Caecitas Judaeorum quomodo Christi adventu aucta est. Magnus terror! Ut qui non vident, videant: bene. Salvatoris officium est, professio medicinae est, Ut qui non vident, videant. Quid est, Domine, quod addidisti, Ut qui vident, caeci fiant? Si intelligamus, verissimum et rectissimum est. Quid est tamen, qui vident? Judaei sunt. Ergo vident? Secundum verba sua vident: secundum veritatem non vident. Quid est ergo, vident? Videre se putant, videre se credunt. Videre enim se credebant, quando contra Christum Legem defendebant. Nos scimus: ergo vident. Quid est, Nos scimus, nisi, nos videmus? Quid est, quia homo iste non est a Deo, quia sic solvit sabbatum? Videntes sunt: quod Lex dicebat, legebant. Praeceptum est enim ut lapidaretur qui solveret sabbatum . Ideo istum dicebant non esse a Deo: sed videntes caeci erant, quia in judicium venit in mundum ille judex futurus vivorum et mortuorum. Quare venit? Ut qui non vident, videant: qui se non videre confitentur, illuminentur. Et qui vident, caeci fiant: id est, qui caecitatem suam non confitentur, gravius obdurentur. Denique impletum est, Qui vident, caeci fiant: Legis defensores, Legis tractatores, Legis doctores, Legis intellectores auctorem Legis crucifixerunt. O caecitas! ipsa est quae ex parte Israel facta est. Ut crucifigeretur Christus, et plenitudo Gentium intraret, caecitas ex parte Israel facta est. Quid est, Ut qui non vident, videant? Ut plenitudo Gentium intraret, caecitas ex parte Israel facta est . Totus orbis caecus jacebat: sed venit ille, ut qui non vident, videant; et qui vident, caeci fiant. Ignoratus est a Judaeis, crucifixus est a Judaeis: de sanguine suo collyrium fecit caecis. Duriores facti, caeci facti qui se jactabant videre lucem, crucifixerunt lucem. Quanta caecitas! Lucem occiderunt: sed crucifixa lux caecos illuminavit.

86.5 PL 38, 753

5. Hear one seeing, who once was blind. Behold, against what a cross they have miserably stumbled, who would not confess their blindness to the Physician! The Law had continued with them. What serveth the Law without grace? Unhappy men, what can the Law do without grace? What doeth the earth without the spittle of Christ? What doeth the Law without grace, but make them more guilty? Why? Because hearers of the Law and not doers, and hereby sinners, transgressors. The son of the hostess of the man of God was dead, and his staff was sent by his servant, and laid upon his face, but he did not revive. What doeth the Law without grace? What saith the Apostle, now seeing, now of blind, enlightened? “For if there had been a Law given which could give life, verily righteousness should have been by the Law.” Take heed; let us answer and say; what is this that he hath said? “If there had been a Law given which could give life, verily righteousness should have been by the Law.” If it could not give life, why was it given? He went on and added, “But the Scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by the faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.” That the promise of illumination, the promise of love by the faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe, that Scripture, that is the Law, hath concluded all under sin. What is, “hath concluded all under sin”? “I had not known concupiscence, except the Law had said, Thou shalt not lust.” What is, “hath concluded all under sin”? Hath made the sinner a transgressor also. For it could not heal the sinner. “It hath concluded all under sin;” but with what hope? The hope of grace, the hope of mercy. Thou hast received the Law: thou didst wish to keep it, thou wast not able; thou hast fallen from pride, hast seen thy weakness. Run to the Physician, wash the face. Long for Christ, confess Christ, believe on Christ; the Spirit is added to the letter, and thou wilt be saved. For if thou take away the Spirit from the letter, “the letter killeth;” if it kill, where is hope? “But the Spirit giveth life.”

Pauli de Legis impotentia et de Judaeorum caecitate testimonium. Audi videntem, qui caecus erat. Ecce in quam crucem male offenderunt, qui caecitatem suam medico confiteri noluerunt. Remanserat illis Lex. Quid facit Lex sine gratia? O miseri! quid fecit Lex sine gratia. Quid facit terra sine Christi saliva? Quid facit Lex sine gratia, nisi magis reos? Quare? Quia Legis auditores et non factores, ac per hoc peccatores, praevaricatores. Mortuus est puer hospitae hominis Dei, et missus est baculus per servum, et positus est super faciem ipsius, et non revixit. Quid facit Lex sine gratia? Apostolus jam videns, jam ex caeco illuminatus, quid dicit? Si enim data esset Lex quae posset vivificare, omnino ex Lege esset justitia. Intendite: respondeamus, et dicamus: quid est quod dixit? Si data esset Lex quae posset vivificare, omnino ex Lege esset justitia. Si non poterat vivificare, ut quid data est? Secutus adjunxit: Sed conclusit Scriptura omnia sub peccato, ut promissio ex fide Jesu Christi daretur credentibus . Promissio illuminationis, promissio dilectionis ex fide Jesu Christi, ut daretur credentibus, Scriptura illa, id est, Lex, conclusit omnia sub peccato. Quid est, conclusit omnia sub peccato? Concupiscentiam nesciebam, nisi Lex diceret, Non concupisces . Quid est, conclusit Scriptura omnia sub peccato? Fecit delictorem etiam praevaricatorem. Nam sanare non potuit peccatorem. Conclusit omnia sub peccato: sed qua spe? Spe gratiae, spe misericordiae. Accepisti Legem; facere voluisti, non potuisti: a superbia cecidisti, languorem tuum vidisti. Curre ad medicum, lava faciem. Opta Christum, confitere Christum, crede in Christum: accedit Spiritus litterae, et eris salvus. Nam si Spiritum litterae detrahas, littera occidit: si occidit, ubi spes? Spiritus autem vivificat .

86.6 PL 38, 753

6. Let then Gehazi, Elisha’s servant, receive the staff, as Moses the servant of God received the Law. Let him receive the staff, receive it, run, go before, anticipate him, lay the staff upon the face of the dead child. And so it was; he did receive it, he ran, he laid the staff upon the face of the dead child. But to what purpose? what serveth the staff? “If there had been a Law given which could give life,” the boy might have been raised to life by the staff; but seeing that “the Scripture hath concluded all under sin,” he still lies dead. But why hath it concluded all under sin? “That the promise by the faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.” Let then Elisha come, who sent the staff by the servant to prove that he was dead; let him come himself, come in his own person, himself enter into the woman’s house, go up to the child, find him dead, conform himself to the members of the dead child, himself not dead, but living. For this he did; he laid his face upon his face, his eyes upon his eyes, his hands upon his hands, his feet upon his feet, he straitened, he contracted himself, being great, he made himself little. He contracted himself; so to say, he lessened himself. “For being in the Form of God, He emptied Himself, taking the form of a servant.” What is He conformed Himself, alive to the dead? Do ye ask, what this is? Hear the Apostle; “God sent His Son.” What is, he conformed himself to the dead? Let him tell this, let him go on and declare it again; “In the likeness of flesh of sin.” This is to conform Himself Alive to the dead; to come to us in the likeness of flesh of sin, not in the flesh of sin. Man lay dead in a flesh of sin, the likeness of flesh of sin conformed Himself to him. For He died who had not wherefore to die. He died, Alone “Free among the dead;” forasmuch as the whole flesh of men was indeed a flesh of sin. And how should it rise again, had not He who had no sin, conforming Himself to the dead, come in the likeness of flesh of sin? O Lord Jesus, who hast suffered for us, not for Thyself, who hadst no guilt, and didst endure its punishment, that thou mightest dissolve at once the guilt and punishment.

Elisaeus baculum praemittens, tum ipse veniens ad suscitandum mortuum, quid adumbret. Accipiat ergo Giezi servus Elisaei baculum, tanquam Legem acceperit servus Dei Moyses. Accipiat baculum, accipiat, currat, praecedat, praeveniat, baculum super faciem pueri mortui ponat. Et factum est: accepit, cucurrit, baculum super faciem pueri mortui posuit. Sed utquid? cui baculum? Si data esset Lex quae posset vivificare, puer resuscitatus esset baculo: sed quia conclusit Scriptura omnia sub peccato, adhuc jacet mortuus. Sed quare conclusit omnia sub peccato? Ut promissio ex fide Jesu Christi daretur credentibus. Veniat ergo Elisaeus, qui misit baculum per servum ad convincendum mortuum: veniat ipse, ipse veniat, ipse hospitium mulieris introeat, ascendat ad puerum, inveniat mortuum, conformet se membris mortui, non mortuus, sed vivus. Hoc enim fecit: faciem super faciem, oculos super oculos, manus super manus, vestigia super pedes posuit, coarctavit se, contraxit se, cum magnus esset parvum se fecit . Contraxit se; ut ita dicam, minoravit se. Quia cum in forma Dei esset, exinanivit se, formam servi accipiens . Quid est, conformavit se vivus mortuo? Quid sit, quaeritis? Apostolum audite: Misit Deus Filium suum. Quid est, conformavit se mortuo? Hoc dicat, sequatur, et ipse dicat: In similitudinem carnis peccati . Hoc est conformare se mortuo vivum: venire ad nos in similitudinem carnis peccati, non in carne peccati. Mortuus jacebat in carne peccati, conformavit se illi similitudo carnis peccati. Mortuus est enim qui quare moreretur non habebat. Mortuus est in mortuis solus liber; quoniam universa caro hominum erat utique caro peccati. Quomodo revivisceret, nisi ille qui non habebat peccatum conformans se mortuo, veniret in similitudinem carnis peccati? O Domine Jesu, passe pro nobis, non pro te, non habens culpam, et sustinens poenam, ut et culpam solvas et poenam.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Save for later

Enter your email and we will send you a sign-in link. No password. What you save (articles, verses, chapters, documents) follows you to any device.