Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 14

sant'Agostino d'Ippona (354–430 d.C.) · In Joannis evangelium tractatus CXXIV · PL 35, 1379–1976

14.1 Chapter III. 29–36 PL 35, 1502

1. This lesson from the holy Gospel shows us the excellency of our Lord Jesus Christ’s divinity, and the humility of the man who earned the title of the Bridegroom’s friend; that we may distinguish between the man who is man, and the Man who is God. For the Man who is God is our Lord Jesus Christ, God before all ages, Man in the age of our world: God of the Father, man of the Virgin, yet one and the same Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, Son of God, God and man. But John, a man of distinguished grace, was sent before Him, a man enlightened by Him who is the Light. For of John it is said, “He was not the Light, but that he should bear witness of the Light.” He may himself be called a light indeed, and rightly so; but an enlightened, not an enlightening light. The light that enlightens, and that which is enlightened, are different things: for even our eyes are called lights (lumina), and yet when we open them in the dark, they do not see. But the light that enlightens is a light both from itself and for itself, and does not need another light for its shining; but all the rest need it, that they may shine.

Lectio ista de sancto Evangelio excellentiam divinitatis Domini nostri Jesu Christi, et humilitatem hominis qui meruit dici amicus sponsi, nos docet; ut distinguamus quid intersit inter hominem hominem, et hominem Deum. Quia homo Deus Dominus noster Jesus Christus, Deus ante omnia saecula, et homo in nostro saeculo: Deus de Patre, homo de Virgine, unus tamen atque idem Dominus et salvator Jesus Christus, Filius Dei, Deus et homo. Joannes vero excellentis gratiae missus ante ipsum; illuminatus ab illo qui lumen est. De Joanne enim dictum est, Non erat ille lumen, sed ut testimonium perhiberet de lumine . Potest quidem dici lumen, et bene dicitur et ipse lumen; sed illuminatum, non illuminans. Aliud est enim lumen quod illuminat, et aliud lumen quod illuminatur: nam et oculi nostri lumina dicuntur, et tamen in tenebris patent, et non vident. Lumen autem illuminans a seipso lumen est, et sibi lumen est, et non indiget alio lumine ut lucere possit, sed ipso indigent caetera ut luceant.

14.2 PL 35, 1502

2. Accordingly John confessed Him: as you have heard that when Jesus was making many disciples, and they reported to John as if to excite him to jealousy,—for they told the matter as if moved by envy, “Lo, he is making more disciples than thou,”—John confessed what he was, and thereby merited to belong to Him, because he dared not affirm himself to be that which Jesus is. Now this is what John said: “A man cannot receive anything, except it be given him from heaven.” Therefore Christ gives, man receives. “Ye yourselves bear me witness that I said, I am not the Christ, but that I am sent before Him. He that hath the bride is the Bridegroom; but the friend of the Bridegroom, who standeth and heareth Him, rejoiceth greatly because of the Bridegroom’s voice.” Not of himself did he give himself joy. He that will have joy of himself shall be sad; but he that will have his joy of God will ever rejoice, because God is everlasting. Dost thou desire to have everlasting joy? Cleave to Him who is everlasting. Such an one John declared himself to be. “Because of the Bridegroom’s voice, the friend of the Bridegroom rejoiceth,” not because of his own voice, and “standeth and heareth.” Therefore, if he falls, he heareth Him not: for of a certain one who fell it is said, “And he stood not in the truth;” this is said of the devil. It behoves the Bridegroom’s friend, then, “to stand and to hear.” What is it to stand? It is to abide in His grace, which he received. And he hears a voice at which he rejoices. Such was John: he knew whereof he rejoiced; he did not arrogate to himself to be what he was not; he knew himself as one enlightened, not the enlightener. “But that was the true Light,” saith the evangelist, “that lighteneth every man coming into this world.” If “every man,” then also John himself; for he too is of men. Moreover, although none hath arisen among them that are born of women greater than John, yet he was himself one of those that are born of women. Is he to be compared with Him who, because He willed it, was born by a singular and extraordinary birth? For both generations of the Lord are unexampled, both the divine and the human: by the divine He has no mother; by the human, no father. Therefore John was but one of the rest: of greater grace, however, so that of those born of women none arose greater than he; so great a testimony he gave to our Lord Jesus Christ as to call Him the Bridegroom, and himself the Bridegroom’s friend, not worthy however to loose the latchet of the Bridegroom’s shoe. You have already heard much on this point, beloved: let us look to what follows; for it is somewhat hard to understand. But as John himself says, that “no man can receive anything, except it be given him from heaven,” whatever we shall not have understood, let us ask Him who gives from heaven: for we are men, and cannot receive anything, except He, who is not man, give it us.

Confessus est ergo Joannes, sicut audistis, quia cum discipulos multos faceret Jesus, et perferretur ad eum veluti ut instigaretur; quasi invido enim narraverunt, Ecce ille facit plures discipulos quam tu: ille confessus est quid esset, et inde meruit ad ipsum pertinere, quia non est ausus se dicere quod est ille. Hoc ergo dixit Joannes, « Non potest homo accipere quidquam, nisi datum illi fuerit de coelo. » Ergo Christus dat, homo accipit. « Ipsi vos mihi testimonium perhibetis quod dixerim, Ego non sum Christus, sed quia missus sum ante illum. Qui habet sponsam, sponsus est: amicus autem sponsi, qui stat et audit eum, gaudio gaudet propter vocem sponsi » . Non sibi gaudium fecit de se. Qui enim vult gaudere de se, tristis erit: qui autem de Deo vult gaudere, semper gaudebit; quia Deus sempiternus est. Vis habere gaudium sempiternum? Inhaere illi qui sempiternus est. Talem se dixit Joannes. Propter vocem sponsi gaudet amicus sponsi, ait, non propter vocem suam: et stat, et audit eum. Si ergo cadit, non audit eum: de illo enim quodam qui cecidit, dictum est, Et in veritate non stetit ; de diabolo dictum est. Ergo stare debet amicus sponsi et audire. Quid est stare? Permanere in gratia ejus quam accepit. Et audit vocem ad quam gaudeat. Sic erat Joannes: noverat unde gaudebat, non sibi arrogabat quod ipse non erat; sciebat illuminatum se, non illuminatorem. Erat autem lumen verum, ait Evangelista, quod illuminat omnem hominem venientem in hunc mundum . Si ergo omnem hominem, et ipsum Joannem; quia et ipse de hominibus. Etenim quamvis nemo exsurrexerit major Joanne in natis mulierum , unus tamen et ipse ex his qui nati sunt ex mulieribus. Numquid comparandus est ei qui, quia voluit, natus est; et ideo novo partu, quia novus natus? Ambae enim generationes Domini inusitatae sunt, et divina et humana: divina non habet matrem, humana non habet patrem. Ergo unus de caeteris Joannes, sed tamen majoris gratiae, ita ut in natis mulierum nemo exsurgeret major illo, tantam testificationem tribuit Domino nostro Jesu Christo, ut illum dicat sponsum, se amicum sponsi, non dignum tamen solvere corrigiam calceamenti ipsius. Hinc audivit jam multa Charitas vestra: quod sequitur videamus; aliquantum enim spissum est ad intelligendum. Sed quoniam dicit ipse Joannes, quia non potest homo accipere quidquam, nisi datum illi fuerit de coelo; quidquid non intellexerimus, rogemus eum qui dat de coelo: quia homines sumus, et non possumus accipere quidquam, nisi ille dederit qui homo non est.

14.3 PL 35, 1503

3. Now this is what follows: and John says, “This my joy therefore is fulfilled.” What is his joy? To rejoice at the Bridegroom’s voice. It is fulfilled in me, I have my grace; more I do not assume to myself, lest also I lose what I have received. What is this joy? “With joy rejoiceth for the Bridegroom’s voice.” A man may understand, then, that he ought not to rejoice of his own wisdom, but of the wisdom which he has received from God. Let him ask nothing more, and he loses not what he found. For many, in that they affirmed themselves to be wise, became fools. The apostle convicts them, and says of them, “Because that which is known of God is manifest to them; for God has showed it unto them.” Hear ye what he says of certain unthankful, ungodly men: “For the invisible things of Him from the creation of the world are seen, being understood by the things that are made, His eternal power likewise, and Godhead; so that they are without excuse.” Why without excuse? “Because, knowing God” (he said not, “because they knew Him not”), “they glorified Him not as God, nor were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened: professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.” If they had known God, they had known at the same time that God, and none other, had made them wise; and they would not then attribute to themselves that which they did not have from themselves, but to Him from whom they had received it. But by their unthankfulness they became fools. Therefore, what God gave freely, He took from the unthankful. John would not be this; he would be thankful: he confessed to have received, and declared that he rejoiced for the Bridegroom’s voice, saying, “Therefore this my joy is fulfilled.”

Hoc ergo sequitur, et dicit Joannes, Hoc ergo gaudium meum impletum est. Quod est gaudium ipsius? Ut gaudeat ad vocem sponsi. Impletum est in me, habeo gratiam meam, plus mihi non assumo, ne et quod accepi amittam. Quod est hoc gaudium? Gaudio gaudet propter vocem sponsi. Intelligat ergo homo non se gaudere debere de sapientia sua, sed de sapientia quam accepit a Deo. Nihil plus quaerat, et non amittit quod invenit. Multi enim ideo facti sunt insipientes, quia dixerunt se esse sapientes. Arguit illos Apostolus, et dicit de ipsis: « Quia quod notum est Dei, ait, manifestum est illis: Deus enim illis manifestavit. » De quibusdam ingratis, impiis, audite quid dicat: « Deus enim illis manifestavit. Invisibilia enim ejus, a creatura mundi, per ea quae facta sunt, intellecta conspiciuntur; sempiterna quoque virtus ejus ac divinitas, ut sint ipsi inexcusabiles. » Quare « inexcusabiles? Quia cognoscentes Deum; » non dixit, quia non cognoverunt; « cognoscentes Deum, non sicut Deum glorificaverunt aut gratias egerunt; sed evanuerunt in cogitationibus suis, et obscuratum est insipiens cor eorum: dicentes enim se esse sapientes, stulti facti sunt » . Si enim Deum cognoverant, simul cognoverant quia non eos fecerat sapientes nisi Deus. Non ergo sibi tribuerent quod a se non habebant, sed ei a quo acceperant. Non autem agendo gratias insipientes facti sunt. Ergo Deus quod dederat gratis, tulit ingratis. Noluit esse hoc Joannes, gratus esse voluit: confessus est accepisse se, et gaudere se dixit propter vocem sponsi, et ait, Hoc ergo gaudium meum impletum est.

14.4 PL 35, 1504

4. “He must increase, but I must decrease.” What is this? He must be exalted, but I must be humbled. How is Jesus to increase? How is God to increase? The perfect does not increase. God neither increases nor decreases. For if He increases, He is not perfect; if He decreases, he is not God. And how can Jesus increase, being God? If to man’s estate, since He deigned to be man and was a child; and, though the Word of God, lay an infant in a manger; and, though His mother’s Creator, yet sucked the milk of infancy of her: then Jesus having grown in age of the flesh, that perhaps is the reason why it is said, “He must increase, but I must decrease.” But why in this? As regards the flesh, John and Jesus were of the same age, there being six months between them: they had grown up together; and if our Lord Jesus Christ had willed to be here longer before His death, and that John should be here with Him, then, as they had grown up together, so would they have grown old together: in what way, then, “He must increase but I must decrease”? Above all, our Lord Jesus Christ being now thirty years old, does a man who is already thirty years old still grow? From that same age, men begin to go downward, and to decline to graver age, thence to old age. Again, even had they both been lads, he would not have said, “He must increase,” but, We must increase together. But now each is thirty years of age. The interval of six months makes no difference in age; the difference is discovered by reading rather than by the look of the persons.

Illum oportet crescere, me autem minui. Quid est hoc? Illum oportet exaltari, me autem humiliari. Quomodo crescit Jesus? quomodo crescit Deus? Perfectus non crescit. Deus autem nec crescit, nec minuitur. Si enim crescit, perfectus non est: si minuitur, Deus non est. Jesus autem Deus quomodo crescit? Si ad aetatem, quia dignatus est esse homo, et fuit puer; et cum sit Verbum Dei, infans in praesepi jacuit, et cum ipse matrem suam condiderit, lac infantiae de matre suxit: quia crevit ergo Jesus aetate carnis, ideo forte dictum est, Illum oportet crescere, me autem minui. Sed quare et hoc? Joannes et Jesus, quod ad carnem pertinet, coaevi erant: sex menses inter se habebant , pariter creverant; et si diutius ante mortem Dominus noster Jesus Christus vellet hic esse, et ipsum Joannem hic secum esse, quomodo pariter creverant, ita pariter senescere poterant: quare ergo, Illum oportet crescere, me autem minui? Primo, quia jam et Dominus triginta annorum erat : numquid juvenis, si jam triginta annorum sit, adhuc crescit? Jam ab ipsa aetate vergere incipiunt homines, et declinare ad graviorem aetatem, et inde ad senectutem. Sed et si pueri essent ambo, non diceret, Illum oportet crescere, me autem minui; sed diceret, Simul nos oportet crescere. Nunc autem triginta annorum ille, triginta et ille: sex menses qui intererant, nullam distinguunt aetatem; magis illud invenit lectio quam aspectio.

14.5 PL 35, 1504

5. What means, then, “He must increase, but I must decrease”? This is a great mystery! Before the Lord Jesus came, men were glorying of themselves; He came a man, to lessen man’s glory, and to increase the glory of God. Now He came without sin, and found all men in sin. If thus He came to put away sin, God may freely give, man may confess. For man’s confession is man’s lowliness: God’s pity is God’s loftiness. Therefore, since He came to forgive man his sins, let man acknowledge his own lowliness and let God show His pity. “He must increase, but I must decrease:” that is, He must give, but I must receive; He must be glorified, but I must confess. Let man know his own condition, and confess to God; and hear the apostle as he says to a proud, elated man, bent on extolling himself: “What hast thou that thou didst not receive? And if thou didst receive it, why dost thou glory as if thou didst not receive it?” Then let man understand that he has received; and when he would call that his own which is not his, let him decrease: for it is good for him that God be glorified in him. Let him decrease in himself, that he may be increased in God. These testimonies and this truth, Christ and John signified by their deaths. For John was lessened by the Head: Christ was exalted on the cross; so that even there it appeared what this is, “He must increase, but I must decrease.” Again, Christ was born when the days were just beginning to lengthen; John was born when they began to shorten. Thus their very creation and deaths testify to the words of John, when he says, “He must increase, but I must decrease.” May the glory of God then increase in us, and our own glory decrease, that even ours may increase in God! For this is what the apostle says, this is what Holy Scripture says: “He that glorieth, let him glory in the Lord.” Wilt thou glory in thyself? Thou wilt grow; but grow worse in thy evil. For whoso grows worse is justly decreased. Let God, then, who is ever perfect, grow, and grow in thee. For the more thou understandest God, and apprehendest Him, He seems to be growing in thee; but in Himself He grows not, being ever perfect. Thou didst understand a little yesterday; thou understandest more to-day, wilt understand much more to-morrow: the very light of God increases in thee: as if thus God increases, who remains ever perfect. It is as if one’s eyes were being cured of former blindness, and he began to see a little glimmer of light, and the next day he saw more, and the third day still more: to him the light would seem to grow; yet the light is perfect, whether he see it or not. Thus it is also with the inner man: he makes progress indeed in God, and God seems to be increasing in him; yet man himself is decreasing, that he may fall from his own glory, and rise into the glory of God.

Quid ergo est, Illum oportet crescere, me autem minui? Magnum hoc sacramentum! intelligat Charitas vestra. Antequam veniret Dominus Jesus, homines gloriabantur de se: venit ille homo, ut minueretur hominis gloria, et augeretur gloria Dei. Etenim venit ille sine peccato, et invenit omnes cum peccato. Si sic venit ille ut dimitteret peccata, Deus largiatur, homo confiteatur. Etenim confessio hominis, humilitas hominis: miseratio Dei, altitudo Dei. Si ergo venit ille dimittere homini peccata, agnoscat homo humilitatem suam, et Deus faciat misericordiam suam. Illum oportet crescere, me autem minui: hoc est, illum oportet dare, me autem accipere; illum oportet glorificari, me autem confiteri. Intelligat homo gradum suum, et confiteatur Deo, et audiat Apostolum dicentem homini superbienti et elato, extollere se volenti: Quid enim habes quod non accepisti? si autem accepisti, quid gloriaris quasi non acceperis ? Intelligat ergo homo quia accepit, qui volebat suum dicere quod non est ejus, et minuatur: bonum est enim illi ut Deus in illo glorificetur. Ipse in se minuatur, ut in Deo augeatur. Haec testimonia et hanc veritatem, etiam passionibus suis significaverunt Christus et Joannes. Nam Joannes capite minutus, Christus in cruce exaltatus; ut et ibi appareret quid est, Illum oportet crescere, me autem minui. Deinde natus est Christus cum jam inciperent crescere dies, natus est Joannes quando coeperunt minui dies. At testata est ipsa creatura et ipsae passiones verbis Joannis dicentis, Illum oportet crescere, me autem minui. Crescat ergo in nobis gloria Dei, et minuatur gloria nostra, ut in Deo crescat et nostra. Hoc enim dicit Apostolus, hoc dicit Scriptura sancta: Qui gloriatur, in Domino glorietur . In te vis gloriari? crescere vis: sed malo tuo male crescis. Qui enim male crescit, juste minuitur. Crescat ergo Deus qui semper perfectus est, crescat in te. Quanto enim magis intelligis Deum, et quanto magis capis, videtur in te crescere Deus: in se autem non crescit, sed semper perfectus est. Intelligebas heri modicum, intelligis hodie amplius, intelliges cras multo amplius: lumen ipsum Dei crescit in te; ita velut Deus crescit, qui semper perfectus manet. Quemadmodum si curarentur alicujus oculi ex pristina caecitate, et inciperet videre paululum lucis, et alia die plus videret, et tertia die amplius, videretur illi lux crescere: lux tamen perfecta est, sive ipse videat, sive non videat. Sic est et interior homo: proficit quidem in Deo, et Deus in illo videtur crescere; ipse tamen minuitur, ut a gloria sua decidat, et in gloriam Dei surgat.

14.6 PL 35, 1505

6. What we have just heard, appears now distinctly and clearly. “He that cometh from above, is above all.” See what he says of Christ. What of himself? “He that is of the earth, is of earth, and speaketh of the earth. He that cometh from above is above all”—this is Christ; and “he that is of the earth, is of earth, and speaketh of the earth”—this is John. And is this the whole: John is of the earth, and speaks of the earth? Is the whole testimony that he bears of Christ a speaking of the earth? Are they not voices of God that are heard from John, when he bears witness of Christ? Then how does he speak of the earth? He said this of man. So far as relates to man in himself, he is of earth, and speaks of the earth; and when he speaks some divine things, he is enlightened by God. For, were he not enlightened, he would be earth speaking of earth. God’s grace is apart by itself, the nature of man apart by itself. Do but examine the nature of man: man is born and grows, he learns the customs of men. What does he know but earth, of earth? He speaks the things of men, knows the things of men, minds the things of men; carnal, he judges carnally, conjectures carnally: lo! it is man all over. Let the grace of God come, and enlighten his darkness, as it saith, “Thou wilt lighten my candle, O Lord; my God, enlighten my darkness;” let it take the mind of man, and turn it to its own light; immediately he begins to say, as the apostle says, “Yet not I, but the grace of God that is with me;” and, “Now I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me.” That is to say, “He must increase, but I must decrease.” Thus John: as regards John, he is of the earth, and speaks of the earth; whatever that is divine thou hast heard from John, is of Him that enlightens, not of him that receives.

Et distincte jam et manifeste apparet quod modo audivimus. Qui de sursum venit, supra omnes est. Vide quid dicat de Christo. Quid de se? Qui est de terra, de terra est, et de terra loquitur. Qui de sursum venit, supra omnes est; Christus est: Qui autem est de terra, de terra est, et de terra loquitur; Joannes est. Et hoc est totum, Joannes de terra est, et de terra loquitur? totum testimonium quod perhibet de Christo, de terra loquitur? non voces Dei audiuntur a Joanne, ubi testimonium perhibet de Christo? Quomodo ergo de terra loquitur? Sed de homine dicebat. Quantum ad ipsum hominem pertinet, de terra est, et de terra loquitur: si autem aliqua loquitur divina, illuminatus est a Deo. Nam si non esset illuminatus, terra terram loqueretur. Ergo seorsum est gratia Dei, seorsum natura hominis. Modo naturam hominis interroga: nascitur et crescit, usitata ista hominum discit. Quid novit nisi terram de terra? Humana loquitur, humana novit, humana sapit; carnalis carnaliter aestimat, carnaliter suspicatur: ecce est totus homo. Veniat gratia Dei, illuminet tenebras illius, sicut dicit, Tu illuminabis lucernam meam, Domine; Deus meus, illumina tenebras meas ; assumat mentem humanam, convertat ad lucem suam: incipit jam dicere, quod Apostolus dicit, Non ego autem, sed gratia Dei mecum ; et, Vivo autem jam non ego, vivit autem in me Christus . Hoc est, Illum oportet crescere, me autem minui. Ergo Joannes, quod ad Joannem pertinet, de terra est, et de terra loquitur: si quid divinum audisti a Joanne, illuminantis est, non recipientis.

14.7 PL 35, 1505

7. “He that cometh from heaven is above all; and what He hath seen and heard, that He testifieth: and no man receiveth His testimony.” Cometh from heaven, is above all, our Lord Jesus Christ; of whom it was said above, “No man hath ascended into heaven, but He that came down from heaven, the Son of man who is in heaven.” And He is above all; “and what He hath seen and heard, that He speaks.” Moreover, He hath a Father, being Himself the Son of God; He hath a Father, and He also hears of the Father. And what is that which He hears of the Father? Who can unfold this? When can my tongue, when can my heart be sufficient, either the heart to understand, or the tongue to utter, what that is which the Son hath heard from the Father? May it be the Son has heard the Word of the Father? Nay, the Son is the Word of the Father. You see how all human effort is here wearied out; you see how all guessing of our heart, all straining of our darkened mind, here fails. I hear the Scripture saying that the Son speaks that which He heareth from the Father; and again, I hear the Scripture saying that the Son is Himself the Word of the Father: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” The words that we speak are fleeting and transient: as soon as thy word has sounded from thy mouth, it passeth away; it makes its noise, and passes away into silence. Canst thou follow thy sound, and hold it to make it stand? Thy thought, however, remains, and of that thought that remains thou utterest many words that pass away. What say we, brethren? When God spake, did He give out a voice, or sounds, or syllables? If He did, in what tongue spake He? In Hebrew, or in Greek, or in Latin? Tongues are necessary where there is a distinction of nations. But there none can say that God spake in this tongue, or in that. Observe thy own heart. When thou conceivest a word which thou mayest utter,—For I will say, if I can, what we may note in ourselves, not whereby we may comprehend that,—well, when thou conceivest a word to utter, thou meanest to utter a thing, and the very conception of the thing is already a word in thy heart: it has not yet come forth, but it is already born in the heart, and is waiting to come forth. But thou considerest the person to whom it is to come forth, with whom thou art to speak: if he is a Latin, thou seekest a Latin expression; if a Greek, thou thinkest of Greek words; if a Punic, thou considerest whether thou knowest the Punic language: for the diversity of hearers thou hast recourse to divers tongues to utter the word conceived; but the conception itself was bound by no tongue in particular. Whilst therefore God, when speaking, required not a language, nor took up any kind of speech, how was He heard by the Son, seeing that God’s speaking is the Son Himself? As, in fact, thou hast in thy heart the word that thou speakest, and as it is with thee, and is none other than the spiritual conception itself (for just as thy soul is spirit, so also the word which thou hast conceived is spirit; for it has not yet received sound to be divided by syllables, but remains in the conception of thy heart, and in the mirror of the mind); so God gave out His Word, that is, begat the Son. And thou, indeed, begettest the word even in thy heart according to time; God without time begat the Son by whom He created all times. Whilst, therefore, the Son is the Word of God, and the Son spoke to us not His own word, but the word of the Father, He willed to speak Himself to us when He was speaking the word of the Father. This it is that John said, as was fit and necessary; and we have expounded according to our ability. He whose heart has not yet attained to a proper perception of so great a matter, has whither to turn himself, has where to knock, has from whom to ask, from whom to seek, of whom to receive.

Qui de coelo venit, supra omnes est; et quod vidit et audivit, hoc testificatur; et testimonium ejus nemo accipit. De coelo venit, supra omnes est, Dominus noster Jesus Christus: de quo superius dictum est, Nemo ascendit in coelum, nisi qui de coelo descendit, Filius hominis qui est in coelo . Est autem super omnes; et quod vidit et audivit, hoc loquitur. Habet enim et Patrem ipse Filius Dei; habet et Patrem, et audit a Patre. Et quod audit a Patre quid est? quis hoc explicat? Quando lingua mea, quando cor meum sufficere potest, vel cor ad intelligendum, vel lingua ad proferendum, quid est quod Filius audivit a Patre? Forte Filius Verbum Patris audivit? Imo Filius Verbum Patris est. Videtis quemadmodum hic fatigetur omnis conatus humanus; videtis quemadmodum hic deficiat omnis conjectura pectoris nostri, et omnis intentio mentis caligantis. Audio dicentem Scripturam quia Filius hoc loquitur, quod audit a Patre; et rursus audio dicentem Scripturam quia ipse Filius Verbum Patris est: In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum. Nos loquimur verba volantia et transeuntia: mox ut sonuerit ore tuo verbum tuum, transit; peragit strepitum suum et transit in silentium. Numquid potes sequi sonum tuum, et tenere ut stet? Cogitatio tamen tua manet, et de ipsa cogitatione manente dicis multa verba transeuntia. Quid dicimus, fratres? Deus cum loqueretur, adhibuit vocem, adhibuit sonos, adhibuit syllabas? Si adhibuit ista, qua lingua locutus est? Hebraea, an graeca, an latina? ibi necessariae linguae, ubi distinctio gentium. Ibi autem nemo potest dicere, illa lingua, vel illa lingua locutum esse Deum. Cor tuum attende. Quando concipis verbum quod dicas: dicam enim, si potero, quod in nobis attendamus, non unde illud comprehendamus: quando ergo concipis verbum quod proferas, rem vis dicere, et ipsa rei conceptio in corde tuo jam verbum est; nondum processit, sed jam natum est in corde, et manet ut procedat: attendis autem ad quem procedat, cum quo loquaris; si Latinus est, vocem latinam quaeris; si Graecus est, verba graeca meditaris; si Punicus est, attendis si nosti linguam punicam; pro diversitate auditorum diversas linguas adhibes, ut proferas verbum conceptum: illud autem quod corde conceperas, nulla lingua tenebatur. Cum ergo Deus loquens, linguam non quaereret, et genus locutionis non assumeret, quomodo auditus est a Filio, cum ipsum Filium sit locutus Deus? Quomodo enim tu verbum quod loqueris, in corde habes, et apud te est, et ipsa conceptio spiritualis est (nam sicut anima tua spiritus est; ita et verbum quod concepisti, spiritus est; nondum enim accepit sonum ut per syllabas dividatur, sed manet in conceptione cordis et in speculo mentis): sic Deus edidit Verbum, hoc est, genuit Filium. Et tu quidem ex tempore gignis verbum etiam in corde: Deus sine tempore genuit Filium, per quem creavit omnia tempora. Cum ergo Verbum De Filius sit, Filius autem locutus est nobis, non verbum suum, sed Verbum Patris, se nobis loqui voluit, qui Verbum Patris loquebatur. Hoc ergo quomodo decuit, et oportuit, dixit Joannes: quomodo potuimus, nos exposuimus. Cui ad cor nondum pervenit dignus de tanta re intellectus, habet quo se convertat, habet quo pulset, habet a quo quaerat, habet a quo petat, habet a quo accipiat.

14.8 PL 35, 1507

8. “He that cometh from heaven is above all; and what He hath seen and heard, that testifieth He; and His testimony no man receiveth.” If no man, to what purpose came He? He means, no man of a certain class. There are some people prepared for the wrath of God, to be damned with the devil; of these, none receiveth the testimony of Christ. For if none at all, not any man, received, what could these words mean, “But he that received His testimony hath set to his seal that God is true”? Not certainly, then, no man, if thou sayest thyself, “He that received His testimony has set to his seal that God is true.” Perhaps John, on being questioned, would answer and say, I know what I have said, in saying no man. There are, in fact, people born to God’s wrath, and thereunto foreknown. For God knows who they are that will and that will not believe; He knows who they are that shall persevere in that in which they have believed, and who that shall fall away; and all that shall be for eternal life are numbered by God; and He knows already the people set apart. And if He knows this, and has given to the prophets by His Spirit to know it, He gave this also to John. Now John was observing, not with his eye,—for as regards himself he is earth, and speaketh of earth,—but with that grace of the Spirit which he received of God, he saw a certain people, ungodly, unbelieving. Contemplating that people in its unbelief, he says, “His testimony, who came from heaven, no man receiveth.” No man of whom? Of them who shall be on the left hand, of them to whom it shall be said, “Go into the everlasting fire, which is prepared for the devil and his angels.” Who are they that do receive it? They who shall be at the right hand, they to whom it shall be said, “Come, ye blessed of my Father, receive the kingdom which is prepared for you from the beginning of the world.” He observes, then, in the Spirit a dividing, but in the human race a mingling together; and that which is not yet separated locally, he separated in the understanding, in the view of the heart; and he saw two peoples, one of believers, one of unbelievers. Fixing his thought on the unbelievers, he says, “He that cometh from heaven is above all; and what He hath seen and heard, that He testifieth and no man receiveth His testimony.” He then turned his thought from the left hand, and looked at the right, and proceeded to say, “He that received His testimony has set to his seal that God is true.” What means “has set to his seal that God is true,” if it be not that man is a liar, and God is true? For no human being can speak any truth, unless he be enlightened by Him who cannot lie. God, then, is true; but Christ is God. Wouldest thou prove this? Receive His testimony and thou findest it. For “he that hath received His testimony has set to his seal that God is true.” Who is true? The same who came from heaven, and is above all, is God, and true. But if thou dost not yet understand Him to be God, thou hast not yet received His testimony: receive it, and thou puttest thy seal to it; confidently thou understandest, definitely thou acknowledgest, that God is true.

Qui de coelo venit, supra omnes est: et quod vidit et audivit, hoc testatur; et testimonium ejus nemo accipit. Si nemo, utquid venit? Quorumdam ergo nemo. Est quidam populus praeparatus ad iram Dei, damnandus cum diabolo: horum nemo accipit testimonium Christi. Nam si omnino nemo, nullus homo; quid est quod sequitur, Qui autem accepit testimonium ejus, signavit quia Deus verax est? Certe ergo non nemo, si tu ipse dicis, Qui accepit testimonium ejus, signavit quia Deus verax est. Responderet ergo fortasse Joannes interrogatus, et diceret, Novi quid dixerim, nemo. Est enim quidam populus natus ad iram Dei, et ad hoc praecognitus. Qui sint enim credituri, et qui non sint credituri, novit Deus; qui sint perseveraturi in eo quod crediderunt, et qui sint lapsuri, novit Deus: et numerati sunt Deo omnes futuri in vitam aeternam; et novit jam illum populum distinctum. Et si ipse novit, et Prophetis dedit nosse per Spiritum suum, dedit et Joanni. Attendebat ergo Joannes, non oculo suo; nam quantum ad ipsum pertinet, terra est, et de terra loquitur: sed in ea gratia Spiritus, quam accepit a Deo, vidit quemdam populum impium, infidelem; attendens illum in infidelitate sua, ait, Testimonium ejus qui venit de coelo, nemo accipit. Quorum nemo? Eorum qui ad sinistram futuri sunt, eorum quibus dicetur, Ite in ignem aeternum qui praeparatus est diabolo et angelis ejus. Qui ergo accipiunt? Illi qui ad dexteram futuri sunt, illi quibus dicetur, Venite, benedicti Patris mei, percipite regnum quod vobis paratum est ab origine mundi . Attendit ergo in spiritu divisionem, in genere autem humano commixtionem; et quod nondum locis separatum est, separavit intellectu, separavit cordis aspectu; et vidit duos populos, fidelium et infidelium: attendit infideles, et ait, Qui de coelo venit, supra omnes est: et quod vidit et audivit, hoc testatur; et testimonium ejus nemo accipit. Deinde transtulit se a sinistra, et aspexit ad dexteram, et secutus ait, Qui accepit testimonium ejus, signavit quia Deus verax est. Quid est, signavit quia Deus verax est, nisi, homo mendax est, et Deus verax est? Quia nemo hominum potest dicere quod veritatis est, nisi illuminetur ab eo qui mentiri non potest. Deus ergo verax, Christus autem Deus. Vis probare? Accipe testimonium ejus, et invenis: Qui enim accepit testimonium ejus, signavit quia Deus verax est. Quis? Ipse qui de coelo venit et supra omnes est, Deus verax est. Sed si nondum illum intelligis Deum, nondum accepisti testimonium ejus: accipe, et signas, praesumenter intelligis, definienter agnoscis quia Deus verax est.

14.9 PL 35, 1507

9. “For He whom God hath sent speaketh the words of God.” Himself is the true God, and God sent Him: God sent God. Join both, one God, true God sent by God. Ask concerning them singly, He is God; ask concerning them both, they are God. Not individually God, and both Gods; but each individual God, and both God. For so great is the charity of the Holy Spirit there, so great the peace of unity, that when thou questionest about them individually, the answer to thee is, God; when thou askest concerning the Trinity, thou gettest for answer, God. For if the spirit of man, when it cleaves to God, is one spirit, as the apostle openly declares, “He that is joined to the Lord is one spirit;” how much more is the equal Son, joined to the Father, together with Him one God! Hear another testimony. You know how many believed, when they sold all they had and laid it at the apostles’ feet, that it might be distributed to each according to his need; and what saith the Scripture of that gathering of the saints? “They had one soul and one heart in the Lord.” If charity made one soul of so many souls, and one heart of so many hearts, how great must be the charity between the Father and the Son! Surely it must be greater than that between those men who had one heart. If, then, the heart of many brethren was one by charity, if the soul of many brethren was one by charity, wouldst thou say that God the Father and God the Son are two? If they are two Gods, there is not the highest charity between them. For if charity is here so great as to make thy soul and thy friend’s soul one soul, how can it be then that the Father and the Son is not one God? Far be unfeigned faith from this thought. In short, how excellent that charity is, understand hence: the souls of many men are many, and if they love one another, it is one soul; still, in the case of men, they may be called many souls, because the union is not so strong. But there it is right for thee to say one God; two or three Gods it is not right for thee to say. From this, the supreme and surpassing excellency of charity is shown thee to be such, that a greater cannot be.

Quem enim misit Deus, verba Dei loquitur. Ipse est Deus verax, et misit illum Deus: Deus misit Deum. Junge ambos, unus Deus, Deus verax missus a Deo. De singulis interroga, Deus: et de ambobus interroga, Deus. Non singuli Deus et ambo dii, sed singulus quisque Deus et ambo Deus. Tanta enim ibi est charitas Spiritus sancti, tanta pax unitatis, ut de singulis cum interrogatur, Deus tibi respondeatur; de Trinitate cum interrogatur, Deus tibi respondeatur. Si enim spiritus hominis quando inhaeret Deo unus spiritus est, aperte Apostolo dicente, Qui adhaeret Domino, unus spiritus est ; quanto magis Filius aequalis adhaerens Patri simul cum illo unus Deus est? Audite alterum testimonium. Nostis quam multi crediderunt, quando omnia quae habebant, ad pedes Apostolorum vendita posuerunt, ut distribueretur unicuique sicut opus erat: et de illa congregatione sanctorum quid dicit Scriptura? Erat illis anima una et cor unum in Domino . Si charitas de tot animis fecit animam unam, et de tot cordibus fecit cor unum, quanta est charitas inter Patrem et Filium? Major utique potest esse quam inter illos homines quibus erat cor unum. Si ergo multorum fratrum cor unum propter charitatem, et multorum fratrum anima una propter charitatem; Deus Pater et Deus Filius, dicturus es quia duo sunt? Si duo dii sunt, non est ibi summa charitas. Si enim hic tanta charitas est, ut animam tuam et animam amici tui unam animam faciat; quomodo ibi non est unus Deus Pater et Filius? Absit ut hoc sentiat fides non ficta. Prorsus quantum excellat charitas illa, hinc intelligite. Multae animae sunt multorum hominum, et si se diligunt, una anima est; sed possunt dici et multae animae, possunt in hominibus, quia non est tanta conjunctio: ibi autem, unum Deum licet dicas; duos aut tres deos non licet dicas. Hinc tibi commendatur supereminentia et summitas charitatis tanta, ut major esse non possit.

14.10 PL 35, 1508

10. “For He whom God hath sent speaketh the words of God.” This, of course, he said of Christ, to distinguish himself from Christ. What then? Did not God send John himself? Did he not say himself, “I am sent before Him”? and, “He that sent me to baptize with water”? And is it not of John that it is said, “Behold, I send my messenger before Thee, and he shall prepare Thy way”? Does he not himself speak the words of God, he of whom it is said that he is more than a prophet? Then, if God sent him too, and he speaks the words of God, how do we understand him to have distinctly said of Christ, “He whom God hath sent speaketh the words of God”? But see what he adds: “For God giveth not the Spirit by measure.” What is this, “For God giveth not the Spirit by measure”? We find that God does give the Spirit by measure. Hear the apostle when he says, “According to the measure of the gift of Christ.” To men He gives by measure, to the only Son He gives not by measure. How does He give to men by measure? “To one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom; to another the word of wisdom according to the same Spirit; to another faith by the same Spirit; to another prophecy; to another discerning of spirits; to another kinds of tongues; to another the gift of healing. Are all apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Are all workers of miracles? Have all the gift of healing? Do all speak with tongues? Do all interpret?” This man has one gift, that man another; and what that man has, this has not: there is a measure, a certain division of gifts. To men, therefore, it is given by measure, and concord among them makes one body. As the hand receives one kind of gift to work, the eye another to see, the ear another to hear, the foot another to walk; nevertheless the soul that does all is one, in the hand to work, in the foot to walk, in the ear to hear, in the eye to see; so are also the gifts of believers diverse, distributed to them as to members, to each according to his proper measure. But Christ, who gives, receives not by measure.

Quem enim misit Deus, verba Dei loquitur. Hoc utique de Christo dicebat, ut se ab illo distingueret. Quid enim? ipsum Joannem nonne Deus misit? An non ipse dixit, Missus sum ante eum , et, Qui me misit baptizare in aqua : et de illo dictum est, Ecce mitto angelum meum ante te, et praeparabit viam tuam? Nonne et ipse verba Dei loquitur, de quo etiam dictum est quod sit amplius quam propheta ? Si ergo et ipsum Deus misit, et verba Dei loquitur; quomodo ad distinctionem, de Christo eum dixisse accipimus, Quem enim misit Deus, verba Dei loquitur? Sed vide quid adjungat: Non enim ad mensuram dat Deus Spiritum. Quid est hoc, Non enim ad mensuram dat Deus Spiritum? Invenimus quia ad mensuram dat Deus Spiritum. Audi Apostolum dicentem, Secundum mensuram donationis Christi . Hominibus ad mensuram dat, unico Filio non dat ad mensuram. Quomodo hominibus ad mensuram? Alii quidem datur per Spiritum sermo sapientiae; alii sermo scientiae secundum eumdem spiritum; alii fides in eodem spiritu, alii prophetia, alii dijudicatio spirituum, alii genera linguarum, alii donatio curationum. Numquid omnes apostoli? numquid omnes prophetae? numquid omnes doctores? numquid omnes virtutes? numquid omnes dona habent sanitatum? numquid omnes linguis loquuntur? numquid omnes interpretantur ? Aliud habet iste, aliud ille; et quod habet ille, non habet iste: mensura est, divisio quaedam donorum est. Ergo hominibus ad mensuram datur, et concordia ibi unum corpus facit. Quomodo aliud accipit manus ut operetur, aliud oculus ut videat, aliud auris ut audiat, aliud pes ut ambulet; anima tamen una est quae agit omnia, in manu ut operetur, in pede ut ambulet, in aure ut audiat, in oculo ut videat: sic sunt etiam diversa dona fidelium, tanquam membris ad mensuram cuique propriam distributa. Sed Christus qui dat, non ad mensuram accipit.

14.11 PL 35, 1509

11. Now hear further what follows: because He had said of the Son, “For God giveth not the Spirit by measure: the Father loveth the Son, and hath given all things into His hand,” He added, “hath given all things into His hands,” that thou mightest know also here with what distinction it is said, “The Father loveth the Son.” And why? Does the Father not love John? And yet He has not given all things into his hand. Does the Father not love Paul? And yet He has not given all things into his hand. “The Father loveth the Son:” but as father loveth, not as master loveth a servant; as the Only Son, not as an adopted son. And so “hath given all things into His hand.” What means “all things”? That the Son should be such as the Father is. To equality with Himself He begat Him in whom it was no robbery to be in the form of God, equal to God. “The Father loveth the Son, and hath given all things into His hand.” Therefore, having deigned to send us the Son, let us not imagine that it is something less than the Father that is sent to us. The Father, in sending the Son, sent His other self.

Audi enim adhuc quid sequitur; quia de Filio dixerat, Non enim ad mensuram dat Deus Spiritum: Pater diligit Filium, et omnia dedit in manu ejus. Adjecit, Omnia dedit in manu ejus, ut nosses et hic qua distinctione dictum sit, Pater diligit Filium. Quare enim? Pater non diligit Joannem? et tamen non omnia dedit in manu ejus. Pater non diligit Paulum? et tamen non omnia dedit in manu ejus. Pater diligit Filium: sed quomodo Pater Filium, non quomodo dominus servum; quomodo Unicum, non quomodo adoptatum. Itaque omnia dedit in manu ejus. Quid est, omnia? Ut tantus sit Filius, quantus est Pater. Ad aequalitatem enim sibi genuit eum, cui rapina non esset in forma Dei esse aequalem Deo . Pater diligit Filium, et omnia dedit in manu ejus. Ergo cum ad nos dignatus est mittere Filium, non putemus aliquid minus nobis missum quam est Pater. Pater mittens Filium, se alterum misit.

14.12 PL 35, 1509

12. But the disciples, still thinking that the Father is something greater than the Son, seeing only the flesh, and not understanding His divinity, said to Him, “Lord, show us the Father and it sufficeth us.” As much as to say, “We know Thee already, and bless Thee that we know Thee: for we thank Thee that Thou hast shown Thyself to us. But as yet we know not the Father: therefore our heart is inflamed, and occupied with a certain holy longing of seeing Thy Father who sent Thee. Show us Him, and we shall desire nothing more of Thee: for it sufficeth us when He has been shown, than whom none can be greater.” A good longing, a good desire; but small intelligence. Now the Lord Jesus Himself, regarding them as small men seeking great things, and Himself great among the small, and yet small among the small, says to Philip, one of the disciples, who had said this: “Am I so long time with you, and ye have not known me, Philip?” Here Philip might have answered, Thee we have known, but did we say to Thee, Show us Thyself? We have known Thee, but it is the Father we seek to know. He immediately adds, “He that hath seen me, hath seen the Father also.” If, then, One equal with the Father has been sent, let us not estimate Him from the weakness of the flesh, but think of the majesty clothed in flesh, but not weighed down by the flesh. For, remaining God with the Father, He was made man among men, that, through Him who was made man, thou mightest become such as to receive God. For man could not receive God. Man could see man; God he could not apprehend. Why could he not apprehend God? Because he had not the eye of the heart, by which to apprehend Him. There was something within disordered, something without sound: man had the eyes of the body sound, but the eyes of the heart sick. He was made man to the eye of the body; so that, believing on Him who could be seen in bodily form, thou mightst be healed for seeing Him whom thou wast not able to see spiritually. “Am I so long time with you, and ye know me not, Philip? He that hath seen me, hath seen the Father also.” Why did they not see Him? Lo, they did see Him, and yet saw not the Father: they saw the flesh, but the majesty was concealed. What the disciples who loved Him saw, saw also the Jews who crucified Him. Inwardly, then, was He all; and in such manner inwardly in the flesh, that He remained with the Father when He came to the flesh.

Namque putantes adhuc discipuli quia Pater aliquid majus est quam Filius, videntes carnem et non intelligentes divinitatem, dixerunt ei: Domine, ostende nobis Patrem, et sufficit nobis. Tanquam dicerent, Jam novimus te, et benedicimus te, quia novimus te: gratias enim tibi agimus, quia ostendisti te nobis; sed Patrem nondum novimus: propterea cor nostrum ardet, et satagit concupiscentia quadam sancta videndi Patris tui qui te misit; ipsum nobis ostende, et nihil amplius a te desiderabimus: sufficit enim nobis cum ille fuerit demonstratus, quo major esse nemo potest. Bona concupiscentia, bonum desiderium; sed parvus intellectus. Attendens enim ipse Dominus Jesus parvos magna quaerentes, et se ipsum magnum inter parvos, et parvum inter parvos, ait Philippo qui hoc dixerat, uni ex discipulis: Tanto tempore vobiscum sum, et non cognovistis me, Philippe? Posset hic Philippus respondere, Cognovimus te; sed numquid diximus tibi, Ostende nobis te? Te cognovimus, sed Patrem quaerimus. Subjecit statim: Qui me vidit, vidit et Patrem . Si ergo aequalis Patri missus est, non eum aestimemus ex infirmitate carnis, sed cogitemus majestatem indutam carne, non oppressam carne. Manens enim Deus apud Patrem, apud homines factus est homo, ut tu per illum qui ad te factus est homo, fieres talis qualis capit Deum. Non enim homo poterat capere Deum: videre poterat homo hominem, capere Deum non poterat. Unde non poterat capere Deum? Quia oculum cordis unde caperet, non habebat. Erat ergo aliquid intus saucium, et aliquid foris sanum: corporis oculos habebat sanos, cordis oculos habebat saucios. Factus est ille homo ad corporis oculum; ut credens in eum qui videri corporaliter potuit, curareris ad eum ipsum videndum quem spiritualiter videre non poteras. Tanto tempore vobiscum sum, et non cognovistis me, Philippe? Qui me vidit, vidit et Patrem. Quare illi non illum videbant? Ecce videbant illum, et Patrem non videbant: videbant carnem, sed majestas latebat. Quod videbant discipuli qui amaverunt, viderunt et Judaei qui crucifixerunt. Intus ergo erat totus ille, et sic intus in carne, ut apud Patrem maneret: non enim deseruit Patrem quando venit ad carnem.

14.13 PL 35, 1510

13. Carnal thought does not apprehend what I say: let it defer understanding, and begin by faith; let it hear what follows: “He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.” He has not said, The wrath of God cometh to him; but, “The wrath of God abideth on him.” All that are born mortals have the wrath of God with them. What wrath of God? That wrath which Adam first received. For if the first man sinned, and heard the sentence, “Thou shalt die the death,” he became mortal, and we began to be born mortal; and we have been born with the wrath of God. From this stock came the Son, not having sin, and He was clothed with flesh and mortality. If He partook with us of the wrath of God, are we slow to partake with Him the grace of God? He, then, that will not believe the Son, on the same “the wrath of God abideth.” What wrath of God? That of which the apostle says, “We also were by nature the children of wrath, even as the rest.” All are therefore children of wrath, because coming of the curse of death. Believe on Christ, for thee made mortal, that thou mayest receive Him, the immortal; and when thou shalt have received His immortality, thou shalt no longer be mortal. He lived, thou wast dead; He died that thou shouldst live. He has brought us the grace of God, and has taken away the wrath of God. God has conquered death, lest death should conquer man.

Carnalis cogitatio non capit quod dico: differat intellectum, et incipiat a fide; audiat quod sequitur: Qui credit in Filium, habet vitam aeternam: qui autem incredulus est Filio, non videbit vitam, sed ira Dei manet super eum. Non dixit, ira Dei venit ad eum; sed, ira Dei manet super eum. Omnes qui nascuntur mortales, habent secum iram Dei. Quam iram Dei? Quam accepit primus Adam. Si enim peccavit primus homo, et audivit, Morte morieris ; factus est mortalis ille, et coepimus nasci mortales; cum ira Dei nati sumus. Venit inde Filius non habens peccatum, et indutus est carne, indutus est mortalitate. Si ille nobiscum communicavit iram Dei, nos pigri sumus cum illo communicare gratiam Dei? Qui ergo non vult credere in Filium, ira Dei manet super eum. Quae ira Dei? De qua dicit Apostolus, Fuimus et nos natura filii irae sicut et caeteri . Omnes ergo filii irae; quia de maledicto mortis venientes. Crede in Christum factum pro te mortalem, ut illum capias immortalem: quando enim ceperis ejus immortalitatem, nec tu eris mortalis. Vivebat, moriebaris: mortuus est, ut vivas. Attulit gratiam Dei, abstulit iram Dei. Deus vicit mortem, ne mors vinceret hominem.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Salva per dopo

Inserisci la tua email: ti invieremo un link per accedere. Nessuna password. Ciò che salvi (voci, versetti, capitoli, documenti) ti segue su ogni dispositivo.