Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 13

sant'Agostino d'Ippona (354–430 d.C.) · In Joannis evangelium tractatus CXXIV · PL 35, 1379–1976

13.1 Chapter III. 22–29 PL 35, 1492

1. The course of reading from the Gospel of John, as those of you who are concerned for your own progress may remember, so proceeds in regular order, that the passage which has now been read comes before us for exposition to-day. You remember that we have expounded it, in the preceding discourses, from the very beginning of the Gospel, as far as the lesson of to-day. And though perhaps you have forgotten much of it, at least it remains in your memory that we have done our part in it. What you have heard from it about the baptism of John, even though you retain not all, yet I believe you have heard that which you may retain. Also, what was said as to why the Holy Spirit appeared in the shape of a dove; and how that most knotty question was solved, namely, what was that something in the Lord which John did not know, and which he learned by means of the dove, whilst already John knew Him, since, as Jesus came to be baptized, he said to Him, “I ought to be baptized by Thee, and comest Thou to me?” when the Lord answered him, “Suffer it now, that all righteousness may be fulfilled.”

Ordo lectionis evangelicae secundum Joannem, sicut potestis meminisse, qui curam geritis profectus vestri, ita sequitur, ut haec quae modo lecta est, hodie nobis tractanda proponatur. Ab ipso principio usque ad hodiernam lectionem, quae supra dicta sunt, meministis jam esse tractata. Et si forte inde multa estis obliti, certe vel officium nostrum manet in vestra memoria. Quae hinc audieritis de baptismo Joannis, etsi non tenetis omnia, audisse vos tamen credo quod teneatis: quae dicta sunt etiam, quare Spiritus sanctus in columbae specie apparuerit; et quomodo illa nodosissima quaestio soluta sit, quia nescio quid quod non noverat, didicit Joannes in Domino per columbam, cum jam eum nosset, quando venienti ut baptizaretur, ait, Ego a te debeo baptizari, et tu venis ad me? Quando ei Dominus respondit, Sine modo, ut impleatur omnis justitia .

13.2 PL 35, 1492

2. Now, therefore, the order of our reading obliges us to return to that same John. The same is he who was prophesied of by Isaiah, “The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye a way for the Lord, make His paths straight.” Such testimony gave he to his Lord and (for the Lord deemed him worthy) his friend. And the Lord, even his friend, did also Himself bear witness to John. For concerning John He said, “Among them that are born of women, there hath not arisen a greater than John the Baptist.” But as He put Himself before John, in that wherein He was greater, He was God. “But he that is less,” saith He, “in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.” Less in age; greater in power, in deity, in majesty, in brightness: even as “in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” In the preceding passages, however, John had given testimony to the Lord, in such wise that he did indeed call Him Son of God, but said not that He was God, nor yet denied it: he was silent as to His being God, not denied that He was God; but yet he was not altogether silent as to His being God, for perhaps we find this in the lesson of to-day. He had called Him Son of God; but men, too, have been called sons of God. He had declared Him to be of such excellence, that he was not himself worthy to loose the latchet of His shoe. Now this greatness gives us much to understand: whose shoe-latchet he was not worthy to loose, he than whom none greater had arisen among them that are born of women. He was more, indeed, than all men and angels. For we find an angel forbidding a man to fall at his feet. For example, when in the Apocalypse an angel was showing certain things to John, the writer of this Gospel, John, terrified at the greatness of the vision, fell down at the angel’s feet. But said the angel, “Rise; see thou do it not: worship God, for I am thy fellow-servant, and the brethren’s.” An angel, then, forbade a man to fall down at his feet. Is it not manifest that He must be above all angels, for whom a man, such that a greater than he has not risen among them that are born of women, declares himself to be not worthy to loose the latchet of His shoe?

Nunc ergo ad eumdem Joannem cogit nos ordo lectionis reverti. Ipse est ille qui prophetatus est per Isaiam, Vox clamantis in eremo, Parate viam Domino, rectas facite semitas ejus . Tale testimonium reddidit Domino suo, et (quia ille dignatus est) amico suo: Dominusque ipsius et amicus ipsius perhibuit et ipse testimonium Joanni. Dixit enim de Joanne, In natis mulierum non exsurrexit major Joanne Baptista. Sed quia illi se praeposuit, in hoc quod plus erat Joanne, Deus erat. Qui autem minor est, inquit, in regno coelorum, major est illo . Minor nativitate, major potestate, major divinitate, majestate, claritate: tanquam in principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum. Sic autem perhibuerat in superioribus lectionibus Joannes Domino testimonium, ut Filium Dei quidem diceret, Deum non diceret, nec tamen negaret: tacuerat Deum, non negaverat Deum, sed non omnino tacuit Deum: fortassis enim invenimus hoc in hodierna lectione. Dixerat Filium Dei: sed dicti sunt et homines filii Dei. Dixerat tantae excellentiae illum fuisse, ut non esset ipse dignus corrigiam calceamenti ejus solvere . Jam magnitudo ista multum dat intelligi, cujus non erat dignus corrigiam calceamenti solvere, ille quo nemo surrexerat major in natis mulierum. Plus enim erat omnibus hominibus et Angelis. Nam angelum invenimus prohibuisse, ne homo illi ad pedes caderet. Cum enim quaedam in Apocalypsi Angelus ostenderet Joanni, qui scripsit hoc Evangelium, conterritus magnitudine visionis Joannes cecidit ad pedes Angeli. Et ille: Surge, vide ne feceris hoc; Deum adora nam ego conservus tuus sum et fratrum tuorum . Cadere ergo sibi ad pedes hominem angelus prohibuit. Nonne manifestum est quia super omnes Angelos est, cui talis homo, quo major nemo surrexit in natis mulierum, dicit indignum se esse solvere corrigiam calceamenti?

13.3 PL 35, 1493

3. John, however, may say something more evidently, that our Lord Jesus Christ is God. We may find this in the present passage, that it is perhaps of Him we have been singing, “The Lord reigned over all the earth;” against which they are deaf who imagine that He reigns only in Africa. But let them not suppose that it is not of Christ it is spoken when it is said, “God reigned over all the earth.” For who else is our King, but our Lord Jesus Christ? It is He that is our King. And what have you heard in the same psalm, in the verse just sung? “Sing praises to our God, sing praises: sing praises to our King, sing praises.” Whom he called God, the same he called our King: “Sing praises to our God, sing praises: sing praises to our King, sing ye praises with understanding.” And that thou shouldest not understand Him to whom thou singest praises to reign in one part, he says, “For God is King of all the earth.” And how is He King of all the earth, who appeared in one part of the earth, in Jerusalem, in Judea, walking among men, born, sucking the breast, growing, eating, drinking, waking, sleeping, sitting at a well, wearied; laid hold of, scourged, spat upon, crowned with thorns, hanged on a tree, wounded with a spear, dead, buried? How then King of all the earth? What was seen locally was flesh, to carnal eyes only flesh was visible; the immortal majesty was concealed in mortal flesh. And with what eyes shall we be able to behold the immortal majesty, after penetrating through the structure of the flesh? There is another eye, there is an inner eye. Tobias, for example, was not without eyes, when, blind in his bodily eyes, he was giving precepts of life to his son. The son was holding the father’s hand, that the father might walk with his feet, whilst the father was giving the son counsel to walk in the way of righteousness. Here I see eyes, and there I understand eyes. And better are the eyes of him that gives counsel of life, than his who holds the hand. Such eyes Jesus also required when He said to Philip, “Am I so long time with you, and ye have not known me?” Such eyes He required when He said, “Philip, he that seeth me, seeth the Father.” These are the eyes of the understanding, these are the eyes of the mind. It is for that reason that the psalm, when it had said, “For God is King of all the earth,” immediately added, “Sing ye praises with understanding.” For in that I say, “Sing ye praises to our God,” I say that God is our King. But yet our King you have seen among men, as man; you have seen Him suffering, crucified, dead: there was in that flesh something concealed, which you might have seen with eyes of flesh. What was there concealed? “Sing ye praises with understanding.” Do not seek to see with the eyes what is beheld by the mind. “Sing praises” with the tongue, for He is among you as flesh; but because “the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us,” render the sound to the flesh, render to God the gaze of the mind. “Sing ye praises with understanding,” and you see that the “Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us.”

Tamen aliquid evidentius dicat Joannes, quia Deus est Dominus noster Jesus Christus. Inveniamus hoc in praesenti lectione, quia forte et de illo cantavimus, Regnavit Deus super omnem terram: contra quod surdi sunt, qui putant eum in Africa sola regnare. Non enim non dictum est de Christo, cum dictum est, Regnavit Deus super omnem terram. Quis est enim alius rex noster, nisi Dominus noster Jesus Christus? Ipse est rex noster. Et quid audistis in ipso Psalmo, recenti versu modo cantato? Psallite Deo nostro, psallite: psallite regi nostro, psallite. Quem dixit Deum, ipsum dixit regem nostrum: Psallite Deo nostro, psallite: psallite regi nostro, psallite intelligenter. Ne in una parte velis intelligere cui psallis: Quoniam rex omnis terrae Deus . Et quomodo est omnis terrae rex, qui visus est in una parte terrarum, in Jerosolyma, in Judaea, ambulans inter homines, natus, sugens, crescens, manducans, bibens, vigilans, dormiens, fatigatus ad puteum sedens, comprehensus, flagellatus, sputis illitus, spinis coronatus, ligno suspensus, lancea percussus, mortuus, sepultus? quomodo ergo rex omnis terrae? Quod videbatur in loco, caro erat: oculis carneis caro apparebat; in carne mortali majestas immortalis occultabatur. Et quibus oculis majestas immortalis penetrata compage carnis poterit intueri? Est alius oculus, est interior oculus. Non enim nullos oculos habebat et Tobias, quando caecus oculis corporeis filio dabat praecepta vitae . Ille patri manum tenebat, ut pedibus ambularet: ille filio consilium dabat, ut viam justitiae teneret. Et hac oculos video, et hac oculos intelligo. Et meliores oculi dantis vitae consilium, quam oculi tenentis manum. Tales oculos quaerebat et Jesus, quando ait Philippo, Tanto tempore vobiscum sum, et non cognovistis me? Tales oculos quaerebat, cum ait, Philippe, qui videt me, videt et Patrem . Isti oculi in intelligentia sunt, isti oculi in mente sunt. Ideo cum dixisset Psalmus, Quoniam rex omnis terrae Deus; subjecit statim, Psallite intelligenter. Quod enim dico, Psallite Deo nostro, psallite; Deum dico regem nostrum. Sed regem nostrum inter homines vidistis tanquam hominem, vidistis passum, crucifixum, mortuum: latebat aliquid in illa carne quam oculis carneis videre potuistis. Quid ibi latebat? Psallite intelligenter; nolite oculis quaerere quod mente conspicitur. Psallite lingua, quia inter vos caro; sed quia Verbum caro factum est, et habitavit in nobis, reddite sonum carni, reddite Deo mentis obtutum. Psallite intelligenter, et videtis quia Verbum caro factum est, et habitavit in nobis.

13.4 PL 35, 1494

4. Now let John also declare his witness: “After these things came Jesus and His disciples into the land of Judea; and there He tarried with them, and baptized.” Being baptized, He baptized. Not with that baptism with which He was baptized did He baptize. The Lord, being baptized by a servant, gives baptism, showing the path of humility and leading to the baptism of the Lord, that is, His own baptism, by giving an example of humility, in not Himself refusing baptism from a servant. And in the baptism by a servant, a way was prepared for the Lord; the Lord also being baptized, made Himself a way for them that come to Him. Let us hear Himself: “I am the way, the truth, and the life.” If thou seekest truth, keep the way, for the way and the truth are the same. The way that thou art going is the same as the whither thou art going: thou art not going by a way as one thing, to an object as another thing; not coming to Christ by something else as a way, thou comest to Christ by Christ. How by Christ to Christ? By Christ the man, to Christ God; by the Word made flesh, to the Word which in the beginning was God with God; from that which man ate, to that which angels daily eat. For so it is written, “He gave them bread of heaven: man ate the bread of angels.” What is the bread of angels? “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” How has man eaten the bread of angels? “And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us.”

Dicat et Joannes testimonium: Post haec venit Jesus et discipuli ejus in Judaeam terram, et illic demorabatur cum eis, et baptizabat. Baptizatus baptizabat. Non eo baptismo baptizabat quo baptizatus est. Dat baptismum Dominus baptizatus a servo, ostendens humilitatis viam, et perducens ad baptismum Domini, hoc est baptismum suum, praebendo humilitatis exemplum, quia ipse non respuit baptismum servi. Et in baptismo servi via praeparabatur Domino, et baptizatus Dominus viam se fecit venientibus. Ipsum audiamus: Ego sum via, veritas et vita . Si veritatem quaeris, viam tene: nam ipsa est via quae est veritas. Ipsa est quo is, ipsa est qua is; non per aliud is ad aliud, non per aliud venis ad Christum: per Christum ad Christum venis. Quomodo per Christum ad Christum? Per Christum hominem ad Christum Deum: per Verbum carnem factum, ad Verbum quod in principio erat Deus apud Deum; ab eo quod manducavit homo, ad illud quod quotidie manducant Angeli. Sic enim scriptum est, Panem coeli dedit eis: panem Angelorum manducavit homo . Quis est panis Angelorum? In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum. Quomodo panem Angelorum manducavit homo? Et Verbum caro factum est, et habitavit in nobis .

13.5 PL 35, 1494

5. But though we have said that angels eat, do not fancy, brethren, that this is done with teeth. For if you think so, God, of whom the angels eat, is as it were torn in pieces. Who tears righteousness in pieces? But still, some one asks me, And who is it that can eat righteousness? Well, how is it said, “Blessed are they that hunger and thirst after righteousness, for they shall be filled”? The food which thou eatest carnally perishes, in order to refresh thee; to repair thy waste it is consumed: eat righteousness; and while thou art refreshed, it continues entire. Just as by seeing this corporeal light, these eyes of ours are refreshed, and yet it is a corporeal thing that is seen by corporeal eyes. Many there have been, when too long in darkness, whose eyesight is weakened by fasting, as it were, from light. The eyes, deprived of their food (for they feed on light), become wearied by fasting, and weakened, so that they cannot bear to see the light by which they are refreshed; and if the light is too long absent, they are quenched, and the very sense of sight dies as it were in them. What then? Does the light become less, because so many eyes are daily fed by it? Thy eyes are refreshed, and the light remains entire. As God was able to show this in the case of corporeal light to corporeal eyes, does He not show that other light to clean hearts as unwearied, continuing entire, and in no respect failing? What light? “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God.” Let us see if this is light. “For with Thee is the fountain of light, and in Thy light shall we see light.” On earth, fountain is one thing, light another. When thirsting, thou seekest a fountain, and to get to the fountain thou seekest light; and if it is not day, thou lightest a lamp to get to the fountain. That fountain is the very light: to the thirsting a fountain, to the blind a light. Let the eyes be opened to see the light, let the lips of the heart be opened to drink of the fountain; that which thou drinkest, thou seest, thou hearest. God becomes all to thee; for He is to thee the whole of these things which thou lovest. If thou regardest things visible, neither is God bread, nor is God water, nor is God this light, nor is He garment nor house. For all these are things visible, and single separate things. What bread is, water is not; and what a garment is, a house is not; and what these things are, God is not, for they are visible things. God is all this to thee: if thou hungerest, He is bread to thee; if thou thirstest, He is water to thee; if thou art in darkness, He is light to thee: for He remains incorruptible. If thou art naked, He is a garment of immortality to thee, when this corruptible shall put on incorruption, and this mortal shall put on immortality. All things can be said of God, and nothing is worthily said of God. Nothing is wider than this poverty of expression. Thou seekest a fitting name for Him, thou canst not find it; thou seekest to speak of Him in any way soever, thou findest that He is all. What likeness have the lamb and the lion? Both is said of Christ. “Behold the Lamb of God!” How a lion? “The Lion of the tribe of Judah hath prevailed.”

Sed quia diximus manducare Angelos, fratres, ne putetis morsibus fieri. Nam si hoc intellexeritis, quasi dilaniatur Deus quem manducant Angeli. Quis dilaniat justitiam? Sed rursum mihi aliquis dicit: Et quis est qui manducat justitiam? Unde ergo, Beati qui esuriunt et sitiunt justitiam, quoniam ipsi saturabuntur ? Cibus quem manducas per carnem, ut reficiaris tu, ille deficit; ut reparet te, consumitur: manduca justitiam, et tu reficeris, et illa integra perseverat. Quomodo videndo istam lucem corpoream reficiuntur isti oculi nostri, et res est corporea quae videtur oculis corporeis. Multi enim cum fuerint diutius in tenebris, infirmatur acies ipsorum, quasi jejunio lucis. Fraudati oculi cibo suo (luce quippe pascuntur), defatigantur jejunio et debilitantur, ita ut ipsam lucem qua reficiuntur, videre non possint: et si diutius abfuerit, exstinguuntur, et tanquam moritur in eis ipsa acies lucis. Quid ergo? quia tot oculi quotidie ista luce pascuntur, minor fit? Et illi reficiuntur, et ipsa integra permanet. Si hoc potuit Deus de luce corporea corporeis oculis exhibere; non exhibet mundis cordibus lucem illam infatigabilem, integram perseverantem, nulla ex parte deficientem? Quam lucem? In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum. Videamus si lux est. Quoniam apud te est fons vitae, et in lumine tuo videbimus lumen . In terra aliud est fons, aliud lumen. Sitiens quaeris fontem, et ut pervenias ad fontem, quaeris lucem: et si dies non est, accendis lucernam, ut ad fontem pervenias. Fons ille, ipsa est lux; sitienti fons est, caeco lux est: aperiantur oculi ut videant lucem, aperiantur fauces cordis ut bibant fontem; quod bibis, hoc vides, hoc audis. Totum tibi fit Deus; quia horum quae diligis, totum tibi est. Si visibilia attendis, nec panis est Deus, nec aqua est Deus, nec lux ista est Deus, nec vestis est Deus, nec domus est Deus. Omnia enim haec visibilia sunt, et singula sunt: quod est panis, non hoc est aqua; et quod est vestis, non hoc est domus; et quod sunt ista, non hoc est Deus: visibilia enim sunt. Deus tibi totum est: si esuris, panis tibi est; si sitis, aqua tibi est; si in tenebris es, lumen tibi est, quia incorruptibilis manet; si nudus es, immortalitatis vestis tibi est, cum corruptibile hoc induerit incorruptionem, et mortale hoc induerit immortalitatem . Omnia possunt dici de Deo, et nihil digne dicitur de Deo. Nihil latius hac inopia. Quaeris congruum nomen, non invenis; quaeris quoquo modo dicere, omnia invenis. Quid simile, agnus et leo? De Christo utrumque dictum est: Ecce agnus Dei . Quomodo leo? Vicit leo de tribu Juda .

13.6 PL 35, 1495

6. Let us hear John: “Jesus baptized.” We said that Jesus baptized. How Jesus? How the Lord? How the Son of God? How the Word? Well, but the Word was made flesh. “And John also was baptizing in Ænon, near to Salim.” A certain lake, “Ænon.” How do we know it was a lake? “Because there was much water there, and they came and were baptized. For John was not yet cast into prison.” If you remember (see, I say it again), I told you why John baptized: because the Lord must needs be baptized. And why must the Lord be baptized? Because many there would be to despise baptism, that they might appear to be endowed with greater grace than they saw other believers endowed with. For example, a catechumen, now living continently, might despise a married person, and say of himself that he was better than the other believer. That catechumen might possibly say in his heart, “What need have I to receive baptism, to have just what that other man has, than whom I am already better?” Therefore, lest that neck of pride should hurl to destruction certain men much elated with the merits of their own righteousness, the Lord was willing to be baptized by a servant, as if addressing His chief sons: “Why do you extol yourselves? Why lift yourselves up because you have, one prudence, another learning, another chastity, another the courage of patience? Can you possibly have as much as I who gave you these? And yet I was baptized by a servant, you disdain to be baptized by the Lord.” This is the sense of “to fulfill all righteousness.”

Audiamus Joannem: Baptizabat Jesus. Diximus quia baptizabat Jesus. Quomodo Jesus? quomodo Dominus? quomodo Dei Filius? quomodo Verbum? Sed Verbum caro factum est. Erat autem et Joannes baptizans in Aenon juxta Salim. Lacus quidam Aenon. Unde intelligitur quia lacus erat? Quia aquae multae erant ibi, et veniebant, et baptizabantur. Nondum enim missus erat in carcerem Joannes. Si meministis (ecce iterum dico), dixi quare baptizabat Joannes: quia oportebat ut Dominus baptizaretur. Et quare oportebat ut Dominus baptizaretur? Quia multi contempturi erant Baptismum, eo quod jam majore gratia praediti viderentur, quam viderent alios fideles. Verbi gratia, jam continenter vivens catechumenus, contemneret conjugatum, et diceret se meliorem quam ille sit fidelis. Ille catechumenus posset dicere in corde suo: Quid mihi opus est Baptismum accipere, ut hoc habeam quod et iste, quo jam melior sum? Ne ergo cervix ista praecipitaret quosdam de meritis justitiae suae plurimum elatos, baptizari voluit Dominus a servo; tanquam alloquens filios capitales: Quid vos extollitis? quid erigitis, quia habetis, ille prudentiam, ille doctrinam, ille castitatem, ille fortitudinem patientiae? Numquid tantum habere potestis, quantum ego qui dedi? Et tamen ego baptizatus sum a servo, vos dedignamini a Domino. Hoc est, Ut impleatur omnis justitia .

13.7 PL 35, 1496

7. But some one will say, “It were enough, then, that John baptized only the Lord; what need was there for others to be baptized by John?” Now we have said this too, that if John had baptized only the Lord, men would not be without this thought, that John had a better baptism than the Lord had. They would say, in fact, “So great was the baptism of John, that Christ alone was worthy to be baptized therewith.” Therefore, to show that the baptism which the Lord was to give was better than that of John,—that the one might be understood as that of a servant, the other as that of the Lord,—the Lord was baptized to give an example of humility; but He was not the only one baptized by John, lest John’s baptism should appear to be better than the baptism of the Lord. To this end, however, our Lord Jesus Christ showed the way, as you have heard, brethren, lest any man, arrogating to himself that he has abundance of some particular grace, should disdain to be baptized with the baptism of the Lord. For whatever the catechumen’s proficiency, he still carries the load of his iniquity: it is not forgiven him until he shall have come to baptism. Just as the people Israel were not rid of the Egyptians until they had come to the Red Sea, so no man is rid of the pressure of sins until he has come to the font of baptism.

Sed dicet aliquis: Sufficiebat ergo ut baptizaret Dominum Joannes; quid opus erat ut alii baptizarentur a Joanne? Et hoc diximus, quia si solus Dominus baptizaretur a Joanne, non deesset ista cogitatio hominibus, quod meliorem habebat baptismum Joannes quam Dominus. Dicerent enim: Usque adeo magnus erat baptismus quem habuit Joannes, ut solus Christus illo fuerit dignus baptizari. Ergo ut ostenderetur melior baptismus quem daturus erat Dominus, et ille tanquam servi intelligeretur, ille tanquam Domini, baptizatus est Dominus, ut praeberet humilitatis exemplum: non solus autem baptizatus est ab eo, ne baptismus Joannis melior baptismo Domini videretur. Ad hoc autem viam praebuit Dominus noster Jesus Christus, sicut audistis, fratres, ne quis arrogans quod habeat abundantiam alicujus gratiae, dedignetur baptizari baptismo Domini. Quantumcumque enim catechumenus proficiat, adhuc sarcinam iniquitatis suae portat: non illi dimittitur, nisi cum venerit ad Baptismum. Quomodo non caruit populus Israel populo Aegyptiorum, nisi cum venisset ad mare rubrum ; sic pressura peccatorum nemo caret, nisi cum ad fontem Baptismi venerit.

13.8 PL 35, 1496

8. “Then there arose a question on the part of John’s disciples with the Jews about purifying.” John baptized, Christ baptized. John’s disciples were moved; there was a running after Christ, people were coming to John. Those who came to John, he sent to Jesus to be baptized; but they who were baptized by Christ were not sent to John. John’s disciples were alarmed, and began to dispute with the Jews, as usually happens. Understand the Jews to have declared that Christ was greater, and that to His baptism people ought to have recourse. John’s disciples, not yet understanding this, defended John’s baptism. They came to John himself, that he might solve the question. Understand, beloved. And here we are given to see the use of humility, and, when people were erring in the subject of dispute, are shown whether John desired to glory in himself. Now probably he said, “You say the truth, you contend rightly; mine is the better baptism, I baptized Christ Himself.” John could say this after Christ was baptized. If he wished to exalt himself, what an opportunity he had to do so! But he knew better before whom to humble himself: to Him whom he knew to have come after himself by birth, he willingly yielded precedence by confessing Him. He understood his own salvation to be in Christ. He had already said above, “We all have received out of His fullness;” and this is to confess Him to be God. For how can all men receive of His fullness, if He be not God? For if He is man in such wise that He is not God, then Himself also receives of the fullness of God, and so is not God. But if all men receive of His fullness, He is the fountain, they are drinkers. They that drink of a fountain, both thirst and drink. The fountain never thirsts; it has never need of itself. Men need a fountain. With thirsty stomachs and parched lips they run to the fountain to be refreshed. The fountain flows to refresh, so does the Lord Jesus.

Facta est ergo quaestio ex discipulis Joannis cum Judaeis de purificatione. Baptizabat Joannes, baptizabat Christus: moti sunt discipuli Joannis; concurrebatur ad Christum, veniebatur ad Joannem. Qui enim veniebant ad Joannem, mittebat illos ad Jesum baptizari; non mittebantur ad Joannem, qui a Christo baptizabantur. Turbati sunt discipuli Joannis, et coeperunt quaestionem tractare cum Judaeis, quomodo solet fieri. Intelligas dixisse Judaeos majorem esse Christum, et ad ejus baptismum debere concurri. Illi nondum intelligentes, defendebant baptismum Joannis. Ventum est ad ipsum Joannem, ut solveret quaestionem. Intelligat Charitas vestra. Et hic utilitas ipsa humilitatis agnoscitur, et ostenditur utrum in ipsa quaestione cum errarent homines, gloriari apud se voluerit Joannes. Fortasse enim dixit: Verum dicitis, recte contenditis, baptismus meus est melior. Nam ut noveritis quod baptismus meus est melior, ipsum Christum ego baptizavi. Poterat hoc dicere Joannes, baptizato Christo. Quantum, se si vellet extendere, habebat ubi se extenderet? Sed melius noverat apud quem se humiliaret: quem se noverat nascendo antecedere, illi voluit confitendo cedere; salutem suam intelligebat in Christo esse. Jam dixerat superius, Nos omnes de plenitudine ejus accepimus : et hoc confiteri Deum est. Quomodo enim omnes homines de plenitudine ejus accipiunt, nisi ille sit Deus? Nam si sic ille homo ut non Deus, de plenitudine Dei accipit etiam ipse, et sic non Deus est. Si autem omnes homines de plenitudine ejus accipiunt, ille est fons, illi bibentes. Qui bibunt fontem, et sitire possunt et bibere; fons nunquam sitit, fons se ipso non eget. Fonte egent homines; aridis visceribus, aridis faucibus currunt ad fontem ut reficiantur: fons fluit ut reficiat; ita Dominus Jesus

13.9 PL 35, 1497

9. Let us see, then, what answer John gives: “They came unto John, and said unto him, Rabbi, he that was with thee beyond Jordan, to whom thou barest witness, behold the same baptizeth, and all men come to him:” that is, What sayest thou? Ought they not to be hindered, that they may rather come to thee? “He answered and said, A man cannot receive anything, except it be given him from heaven.” Of whom, think you, had John said this? Of himself. “As a man, I received,” saith he, “from heaven.” Note, my beloved: “A man cannot receive anything, except it be given him from heaven. Ye yourselves bear me witness that I said, I am not the Christ.” As much as to say, “Why do ye deceive yourselves? See how you have put this question before me. What have you said to me? ‘Rabbi, he that was with thee beyond Jordan, to whom thou barest witness.’ Then you know what sort of witness I bare to Him. Am I now to say that He is not the same whom I declared Him to be? And because I received somewhat from heaven, in order to be something, do you wish me to be empty of it, so as to speak against the truth? ‘A man cannot receive anything, except it be given him from heaven. Ye yourselves bear me witness that I said I am not the Christ.’” Thou art not the Christ; but what if thou art greater than He since thou didst baptize Him? “I am sent:” I am the herald, He is the Judge.

Videamus ergo quid responderit Joannes: Venerunt ad Joannem, et dixerunt ei: Rabbi, qui erat tecum trans Jordanem, cui tu testimonium perhibuisti, ecce hic baptizat, et omnes veniunt ad illum: hoc est, Quid dicis? non sunt prohibendi, ut ad te potius veniant? Respondit, et dixit: Non potest homo quidquam accipere, nisi ei datum fuerit de coelo. De quo putatis hoc dixisse Joannem? De seipso: Quasi homo accepi, ait, de coelo. Intendat Charitas vestra. Non potest homo quidquam accipere, nisi fuerit ei datum de coelo. Ipsi vos mihi testimonium perhibetis quod dixerim, Ego non sum Christus. Tanquam dicens, quid vos fallitis? vos ipsi mihi quomodo proposuistis istam quaestionem? Quid mihi dixistis? Rabbi, qui erat tecum trans Jordanem, cui tu testimonium perhibuisti. Nostis ergo quale testimonium illi perhibui: modo dicturus sum non esse illum quem dixi esse? Ergo quia aliquid accepi de coelo ut aliquid essem, inanem me vultis esse, ut loquar contra veritatem? Non potest homo accipere quidquam, nisi fuerit illi datum de coelo. Ipsi vos mihi testimonium perhibetis quod dixerim, Ego non sum Christus. Non es tu Christus: sed quid, si major illo, quia tu illum baptizasti? Missus sum: ego praeco sum, ille judex est.

13.10 PL 35, 1497

10. But hear a far stronger, a far more expressive testimony. See ye what it is we are treating of; see ye that to love any person in place of Christ is adultery. Why do I say this? Let us attend to the voice of John. People could be mistaken in him, could think him to be the person he was not. He rejects the false honor, in order to hold the truth complete. See what he declares Christ to be; what does he say himself is? “He that hath the bride is the bridegroom.” Be chaste, love the bridegroom. But what art thou, who sayest to us, “He that hath the bride is the bridegroom? But the friend of the bridegroom, who standeth and heareth him, rejoiceth greatly because of the bridegroom’s voice.” The Lord our God will help me in proportion to the tumult of my heart, for it is full of sadness, to utter the grief I feel; but I beseech you by Christ Himself to imagine in thought what it will not be possible for me to utter; for I know that my grief cannot be expressed with befitting impressiveness. Now I see many adulterers who desire to get possession of the bride, purchased at so great a price, loved while deformed that she might be made fair, having been purchased and delivered and adorned by such an one; and those adulterers strive with their words to be loved instead of the bridegroom. Of that One it is said, “This is He that baptizeth.” Who is he that goes forth from us and says, “I am he that baptizeth”? Who is he that goes forth from us and says, “That is holy which I give”? Who is he that goes hence and says, “It is good for thee to be born of me”? Let us hear the friend of the bridegroom, not the adulterers against the bridegroom; let us hear one jealous, but not for himself.

Et audi testimonium multo vehementius, multo expressius. Videte quid nobiscum agitur; videte quid amare debeamus; videte quia aliquem hominem amare pro Christo, adulterium est. Quare hoc dico? Attendamus vocem Joannis: poterat in illo errari, poterat ipse putari qui non erat; respuit a se falsum honorem, ut teneat solidam veritatem. Videte quid dicat Christum, quid se: Qui habet sponsam, sponsus est. Casti estote, sponsum amate. Quid autem tu es, qui nobis dicis, Qui habet sponsam, sponsus est? Amicus autem sponsi, qui stat et audit eum, gaudio gaudet propter vocem sponsi. Aderit Dominus Deus noster pro motu cordis mei, multo enim gemitu plenum est, dicere quod doleo: sed obsecro vos per ipsum Christum, ut quod dicere non potuero, vos cogitetis; novi enim dolorem meum exprimi satis digne non posse. Multos enim adulteros video, qui sponsam tanto pretio emptam, amatam foedam ut pulchra fieret, illo emptore, illo liberatore, illo decoratore, possidere volunt; et id agunt verbis suis, ut pro sponso amentur. De illo dictum est, Hic est qui baptizat . Quis huc exit et dicit, Ego baptizo? quis huc exit et dicit, Ego quod dedero, hoc est sanctum? quis huc procedit qui dicit, Bonum est tibi ut nascaris ex me? Amicum sponsi audiamus, non adulteros sponsi: audiamus zelantem, sed non sibi.

13.11 PL 35, 1497

11. Brethen, return in thought to your own homes. I speak of carnal, I speak of earthly things; I speak after the manner of men, for the infirmity of your flesh. Many of you have, many of you wish to have, many, though you wish not to have, still have had wives; many who do not at all wish to have wives, are born of the wives of your fathers. This is a feeling that touches every heart. There is no man so alien from mankind in human affairs as not to feel what I say. Suppose that a man, having set out on a journey, had commended his bride to the care of his friend: “See, I pray thee, thou art my dear friend; see to it, lest in my absence some other may perchance be loved in my stead.” Then what sort of a person must he be, who, while the guardian of the bride or wife of his friend, does indeed endeavor that none other be loved, but if he wishes himself to be loved instead of his friend, and desires to enjoy her who was committed to his care, how detestable must he appear to all mankind! Let him see her gazing out of the window, or joking with some one somewhat too heedlessly, he forbids her as one who is jealous. I see him jealous, but let me see for whom he is jealous; whether for his absent friend or for his present self. Think that our Lord Jesus Christ has done this. He has committed His bride to the care of His friend; He has set out on a journey to a far country to receive a kingdom, as He says Himself in the Gospel, but yet is present in His majesty. Let the friend who has gone beyond the sea be deceived; and if he is deceived, woe to him who deceives! Why do men attempt to deceive God,—God who looks at the hearts of all, and searches the secrets of all? But some heretic shows himself, and says, “’Tis I that give, ’tis I that sanctify, ’tis I that justify; go not thou to that other sect.” He does well indeed to be jealous, but see for whom. “Go not thou to idols,” saith he,—he is rightly jealous; “nor to diviners,”—still rightly jealous. Let us see for whom he is jealous: “What I give is holy, because it is I that give it; he is baptized whom I baptize; he whom I baptize not is not baptized.” Hear thou the friend of the bridegroom, learn to be jealous for thy friend; hear His voice who is “He that baptizeth.” Why desire to arrogate to thyself what is not thine? Is he so very absent who has left here his bride? Knowest thou not, that He who rose from the dead is sitting at the right hand of the Father? If the Jews despised Him hanging on the tree, dost thou despise Him sitting in heaven? Be assured, beloved, that I suffer great grief of this matter; but, as I have said, I leave the rest to your thoughts. I cannot utter it if I speak the whole day. If I bewail it the whole day, I do not enough. I cannot utter it, if I should have, as the prophet says, “a fountain of tears;” and were I changed into tears, and to become all tears, were I turned into tongues, and to become all tongues, it were not enough.

Fratres, regredimini corde ad vestras domos, carnalia loquor, terrena loquor; humanum dico, propter infirmitatem carnis vestrae . Multi habetis conjuges, multi habere vultis, multi etsi non vultis, habuistis; multi qui omnino conjuges habere non vultis, de conjugibus patrum vestrorum nati estis: nullum cor est quod non iste tangat affectus; nullus in rebus humanis tam avius a genere humano est, qui quod dico non sentiat. Ponite aliquem peregre profectum, commendasse amico suo sponsam suam: Vide, quaeso te, charus meus es, ne forte me absente pro me aliquis ametur. Qualis ergo ille, qui custodiens sponsam vel uxorem amici sui, dat quidem operam ut nullus alius ametur, sed si se amari pro amico voluerit, et uti voluerit commendata sibi, quam detestandus universo humano generi apparet? Videat illam aliquanto petulantius per fenestram attendere aut jocari cum aliquo, prohibet tanquam zelet: video zelantem, sed videam cui; utrum amico absenti, an sibi praesenti. Putate hoc Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum fecisse. Commendavit amico suo sponsam suam, peregre profectus est accipere regnum, sicut dicit ipse in Evangelio , et tamen praesens est majestate. Fallatur amicus qui trans mare profectus est; et si fallitur, vae illi qui fallit! quid Deum fallere conantur, Deum intuentem omnium corda, et omnium secreta rimantem? Existit aliquis haereticus, et dicit: Ego do, ego sanctifico, ego justifico, nolo eas ad illam sectam. Bene quidem zelat, sed vide cui. Non eas ad idola, bene zelat: non ad sortilegos, bene zelat. Videamus cui zelat: Ego quod do sanctum est, quia ego do; ego quem baptizo baptizatus est, quem non baptizo non est baptizatus. Audi amicum sponsi, disce zelare amico tuo: audi vocem illius, Hic est qui baptizat. Quare tibi vis arrogare quod tuum non est? Usque adeo absens est qui hic reliquit sponsam suam? Nescis quia ille qui a mortuis resurrexit, ad dexteram Patris sedet? Si contempserunt eum Judaei in ligno pendentem, tu contemnis in coelo sedentem? Noverit Charitas vestra magnum dolorem me pati de hac re: sed, ut dixi, dimitto caetera cogitationibus vestris. Non enim dico, si loquar tota die; si plangam tota die, non sufficio: non dico, si habeam, sicut dicit propheta, fontem lacrymarum ; sed si convertar in lacrymas, et lacrymae fiam, in linguas, et linguae fiam, parum est.

13.12 PL 35, 1498

12. Let us return and see what this John saith: “He that hath the bride is the bridegroom;” she is not my bride. And dost thou not rejoice in the marriage? Yea, saith he, I do rejoice: “But the friend of the bridegroom, who standeth and heareth him, rejoiceth greatly because of the voice of the bridegroom.” Not because of mine own voice, saith he, do I rejoice, but because of the Bridegroom’s voice. I am in the place of hearer; He, of speaker: I am as one that must be enlightened, He is the light; I am as the ear, He is the word. Therefore the friend of the Bridegroom standeth and heareth Him. Why standeth? Because he falls not. How falls not? Because he is humble. See him standing on solid ground; “I am not worthy to loose the latchet of His shoe.” Thou doest well to be humble; deservedly thou dost not fall; deservedly thou standest, and hearest Him, and rejoicest greatly for the Bridegroom’s voice. So also the apostle is the Bridegroom’s friend; he too is jealous, not for himself, but for the Bridegroom. Hear his voice when he is jealous: “I am jealous over you,” said he, “with the jealousy of God:” not with my own, nor for myself, but with the jealousy of God. Why? How? Over whom art thou jealous, and for whom? “For I have espoused you to one husband, to present a chaste virgin to Christ.” Why dost thou fear, then? Why art thou jealous? “I fear,” saith he, “lest, as the serpent beguiled Eve by his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the chastity which is in Christ.” The whole Church is called a virgin. You see that the members of the Church are divers, that they are endowed with and do rejoice in divers gifts: some men wedded, some women wedded; some are widowers who seek no more to have wives, some are widows who seek no more to have husbands; some men preserve continence from their youth, some women have vowed their virginity to God: divers are the gifts, but all these are one virgin. Where is this virginity, for it is not in the body. It belongs to few women; and if virginity can be said of men, to few men in the Church belongs a holy integrity even of body; yet one such is a more honorable member. Other members, however, preserve virginity, not in body, but all in mind. What is the virginity of the mind? Entire faith, firm hope, sincere charity. This is the virginity which he, who, was jealous for the Bridegroom, feared might be corrupted by the serpent. For, just as the bodily member is marred in a certain part, so the seduction of the tongue defiles the virginity of the heart. Let her who does not desire without cause to keep virginity of body, see to it that she be not corrupted in mind.

Redeamus, videamus quid dicit iste: Qui habet sponsam, sponsus est; non est mea sponsa. Et non gaudes in nuptiis? Imo gaudeo, ait: Amicus autem sponsi, qui stat et audit eum, gaudio gaudet propter vocem sponsi. Non, inquit, gaudeo propter vocem meam, sed propter vocem sponsi gaudeo. Ego sum in audiendo, ille in dicendo: ego sum enim illuminandus, ille lumen; ego sum in aure, ille Verbum. Ergo amicus sponsi stat et audit eum. Quare stat? Quia non cadit. Quare non cadit? Quia humilis est. Vide stantem in solido: Non sum dignus corrigiam calceamenti ejus solvere . Bene te humilias, merito non cadis, merito stas, merito audis eum, et gaudio gaudes propter vocem sponsi. Sic et Apostolus amicus sponsi, zelat et ipse, non sibi, sed sponso. Audi vocem zelantis: Zelo Dei vos zelo, dixit; non meo, non mihi, sed zelo Dei. Unde? quomodo? quam zelas, vel cui zelas? Desponsavi enim vos uni viro, virginem castam exhibere Christo. Quid ergo times? quare zelas? Timeo, inquit, ne sicut serpens seduxit Evam astutia sua, sic et vestri sensus corrumpantur a castitate quae est in Christo . Omnis Ecclesia virgo appellata est. Diversa esse membra Ecclesiae, diversis donis pollere videtis atque gaudere: alii conjugati, aliae conjugatae, alii viduati uxores ultra non quaerunt, aliae viduatae maritos ultra non quaerunt, alii integritatem ab ineunte aetate conservant, aliae virginitatem suam Deo voverunt; diversa sunt munera, sed omnes isti una virgo est. Ubi est ista virginitas? non enim in corpore. Paucarum feminarum est, et si dici virginitas in viris potest, paucorum virorum sancta integritas etiam corporis est in Ecclesia, et honorabilius membrum est: alia autem membra non in corpore, sed omnia in mente servant virginitatem. Quae est virginitas mentis? Integra fides, solida spes, sincera charitas. Hanc virginitatem timebat ille, qui zelabat sponso, a serpente corrumpi. Sicut enim membrum corporis violatur in quodam loco, sic seductio linguae violat virginitatem cordis. In mente non corrumpatur, quae non vult sine causa tenere corporis virginitatem.

13.13 PL 35, 1499

13. What shall I say, then, brethren? Even the heretics have virgins, and there are many virgins among heretics. Let us see whether they love the Bridegroom, so that this virginity may be guarded. For whom is it guarded? “For Christ.” Let us see if it be for Christ, and not for Donatus: let us see for whom this virginity is preserved: you can easily prove. Behold, I show you the Bridegroom, for He shows Himself. John bears witness to Him: “This is He that baptizeth.” O thou virgin, if for this Bridegroom thou preservest thy virginity, why runnest thou to him who says, “I am he that baptizeth,” while the friend of the Bridegroom tells thee, “This is He that baptizeth”? Again, thy Bridegroom possesseth the whole world; why, then, shouldst thou be defiled with a part of it? Who is the Bridegroom? “For God is King of all the earth.” This thy Bridegroom possesses the whole, because He purchased the whole. See at what price He purchased it, that thou mayest understand what He has purchased. What price has He given? He gave His blood. Where gave He, where shed He, His blood? In His passion. Is it not to thy Bridegroom thou singest, or feignest to sing, when the whole world was purchased: “They pierced my hands and my feet, they counted all my bones: but they themselves considered me, they looked upon me, they divided my garments among them, and upon my vesture they cast lots”? Thou art the bride, acknowledge thy Bridegroom’s vesture. Upon what vesture was the lot cast? Ask the Gospel; see to whom thou art espoused, see from whom thou receivest pledges. Ask the Gospel; see what it tells thee in the suffering of the Lord. “There was a coat” there: let us see what kind; “woven from the top throughout.” What does the coat woven from the top signify, but charity? What does this coat signify, but unity? Consider this coat, which not even the persecutors of Christ divided. For it saith, “They said among themselves, Let us not divide it, but let us cast lots upon it.” Behold that of which the psalm spoke! Christ’s persecutors did not rend His garment; Christians divide the Church.

Quid ergo dicam, fratres? Et haeretici habent virgines, et multae sunt virgines haereticorum. Videamus si sponsum amant, ut virginitas ista custodiatur. Cui custoditur? Christo, inquit. Videamus si Christo, non Donato: videamus cui servetur ista virginitas; cito probare poteritis. Ecce ostendo sponsum, quia ipse se ostendit: perhibet illi testimonium Joannes, Hic est qui baptizat. O tu virgo, si sponso huic servas virginitatem tuam, quare curris ad eum qui dicit, Ego baptizo; cum amicus sponsi tui dicat, Hic est qui baptizat? Deinde sponsus tuus totum orbem tenet; quare tu in parte corrumperis? Quis est sponsus? Quoniam rex omnis terrae Deus . Ipse sponsus tuus totum tenet, quia totum emit. Vide quanti emerit, ut intelligas quid emerit: quod pretium dedit? Sanguinem dedit. Ubi dedit, ubi fudit sanguinem suum? In passione. Nonne sponso tuo cantas, aut cantare te fingis, quando emptus est totus orbis: Foderunt manus meas et pedes, dinumeraverunt omnia ossa mea: ipsi vero consideraverunt, et conspexerunt me; diviserunt sibi vestimenta mea, et super vestem meam miserunt sortem? Sponsa es, agnosce vestem sponsi tui. Super quam vestem missa est sors? Interroga Evangelium; vide cui desponsata sis, vide a quo arrhas accipias. Interroga Evangelium; vide quid tibi dicat in passione Domini. Erat ibi tunica: videamus qualis: desuper texta. Desuper texta tunica quid significat, nisi charitatem? desuper texta tunica quid significat, nisi unitatem? Hanc tunicam attende, quam nec persecutores Christi diviserunt. Ait enim: Dixerunt inter se, Non dividamus eam, sed sortem super eam mittamus . Ecce unde audistis Psalmum. Vestem persecutores non consciderunt: christiani Ecclesiam dividunt.

13.14 PL 35, 1500

14. But what shall I say, brethren? Let us see plainly what He purchased. For there He bought, where He paid the price. Paid it for how much? If He paid it only for Africa, let us be Donatists, and not be called Donatists, but Christians; since Christ bought only Africa: although even here are other than Donatists. But He has not been silent of what He bought in this transaction. He has made up the account: thanks be to God, He has not tricked us. Need there is for that bride to hear, and then to understand to whom she has vowed her virginity. There, in that psalm where it says, “They pierced my hands and my feet, they counted all my bones;” wherein the Lord’s passion is most openly declared;—the psalm which is read every year on the last week, in the hearing of the whole people, at the approach of Christ’s passion; and this psalm is read both among them and us;—there, I say, note, brethren, what He has bought: let the bill of merchandise be read: hear ye what He bought: “All the ends of the earth shall remember, and turn unto the Lord; and all the kindreds of the nations shall worship in His sight: for the kingdom is His, and He shall rule the nations.” Behold what it is He has bought! Behold! “For God, the King of all the earth,” is thy Bridegroom. Why, then, wouldst thou have one so rich reduced to rags? Acknowledge Him: He bought the whole; yet thou sayest, “Thou hast a part of it here.” Oh, would that thou wert well-pleasing to thy Spouse; would that thou who speakest wert not defiled, and, what is worse, defiled in heart, not in body! Thou lovest a man instead of Christ; lovest one that says, “’Tis I that baptize;” not hearing the friend of the Bridegroom when he says, “This is He that baptizeth;” not hearing him when he says, “He that hath the bride is the Bridegroom.” I have not the bride, said he; but what am I? “But the friend of the Bridegroom, who standeth and heareth Him, rejoiceth greatly, because of the Bridegroom’s voice.”

Sed quid dicam, fratres? Aperte videamus quid emerit. Ibi enim emit, ubi pretium dedit. Pro quanto dedit? Si pro Africa dedit, simus Donatistae, et non appellemur Donatistae, sed Christiani; quia Christus solam Africam emit: quanquam et hic non soli Donatistae. Sed non tacuit in commercio suo quid emerit. Fecit tabulas: Deo gratias, non nos fefellit. Opus est ut audiat illa sponsa, et ibi intelligat cui voverit virginitatem. Ibi in ipso psalmo ubi dictum est, Foderunt manus meas et pedes, dinumeraverunt omnia ossa mea; ubi passio Domini apertissime declaratur: qui psalmus omni anno legitur novissima hebdomada intento universo populo, imminente passione Christi, et apud nos, et apud illos psalmus iste legitur. Intendite, fratres, quid ibi emit; recitentur tabulae commerciales; quid ibi emit, audite: Commemorabuntur et convertentur ad Dominum universi fines terrae; et adorabunt in conspectu ejus universae patriae gentium: quoniam ipsius est regnum, et ipse dominabitur gentium . Ecce quid emit. Ecce quoniam rex omnis terrae Deus est sponsus tuus. Quid ergo ad pannos vis deduci talem divitem? Agnosce: totum emit, et tu dicis, Partem hic habes. O si placeres sponso, o si non corrupta loquereris, et corrupta, quod pejus est, corde, non corpore! Amas hominem pro Christo, amas dicentem, Ego baptizo: amicum sponsi non audis dicentem, Hic est qui baptizat; non audis dicentem, Qui habet sponsam, sponsus est. Ego non habeo sponsam, dixit: sed quid sum? Amicus autem sponsi, qui stat et audit eum, gaudio gaudet propter vocem sponsi .

13.15 PL 35, 1500

15. Evidently, then, my brethren, it profits those men nothing to keep virginity, to have continence, to give alms. All those doings which are praised in the Church profit them nothing; because they rend unity, namely, that “coat” of charity. What do they? Many among them are eloquent; great tongues, streams of tongues. Do they speak like angels? Let them hear the friend of the Bridegroom, jealous for the Bridegroom, not for himself: “Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.”

Evidenter ergo, fratres mei, nihil prodest istis servare virginitatem, habere continentiam, eleemosynas dare; omnia illa quae laudantur in Ecclesia, nihil illis prosunt: quia conscindunt unitatem, id est, tunicam illam charitatis. Quid faciunt? Diserti sunt multi inter illos, magnae linguae, flumina linguarum. Numquid angelice loquuntur? Audiant amicum sponsi zelantem sponso, non sibi: Si linguis hominum loquar et Angelorum, charitatem autem non habeam, factus sum ut aeramentum sonans, aut cymbalum tinniens .

13.16 PL 35, 1500

16. But what say they? “We have baptism.” Thou hast, but not thine. It is one thing to have, another to own. Baptism thou hast, for thou hast received to be baptized, received as one enlightened, provided thou be not darkened of thyself; and when thou givest, thou givest as a minister, not as owner; as a herald proclaiming, not as a judge. The judge speaks through the herald, and nevertheless it is not written in the registers, “The herald said,” but, “The judge said.” Therefore see if what thou givest is thine by authority. But if thou hast received, confess with the friend of the Bridegroom, “A man cannot receive anything, except it be given him from heaven.” Confess with the friend of the Bridegroom, “He that hath the bride is the Bridegroom; but the friend of the Bridegroom standeth and heareth Him.” But O, would thou didst stand and hear Him, and not fall, to hear thyself! For by hearing Him, thou wouldst stand and hear; for thou wilt speak, and thy head is puffed with pride. I, saith the Church, if I am the bride, if I have received pledges, if I have been redeemed at the price of that blood, do hear the voice of the Bridegroom; and I do hear the voice of the Bridegroom’s friend too, if he give glory to my Bridegroom, not to himself. Let the friend speak: “He that hath the bride is the Bridegroom; but the friend of the Bridegroom standeth and heareth Him, and rejoices greatly because of the voice of the Bridegroom.” Behold, thou hast sacraments; and I grant that thou hast. Thou hast the form, but thou art a branch cut off from the vine; thou hast a form, I want the root. There is no fruit of the form, except where there is a root; but where is the root but in charity? Hear the form of the cut-off branches; let Paul speak: “Though I know all mysteries,” saith he, “and have all prophecy, and all faith” (and how great a faith!), “so as to remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing.”

Sed quid dicunt? Habemus Baptismum. Habes, sed non tuum. Aliud est habere, aliud dominari. Baptismum habes, quia accepisti ut baptizatus sis, accepisti tanquam illuminatus; si tamen a te non tenebratus: et quando das, minister das, non possessor; praeco clamas, non judex. Per praeconem loquitur judex, et in actis tamen non scribitur, Praeco dixit; sed, Judex dixit. Proinde vide si tuum est quod das, potestate. Si autem accepisti, confitere cum amico sponsi, Non potest homo accipere quidquam, nisi datum fuerit ei de coelo. Confitere cum amico sponsi, Qui habet sponsam, sponsus est; amicus autem sponsi stat et audit eum. Sed o si stares et audires eum, et non caderes ut audires te! Audiendo enim eum, stares et audires: nam loqueris, et tibi caput inflas. Ego, inquit Ecclesia, si sponsa sum, si arrhas accepi, si pretio sanguinis illius redempta sum, audio vocem sponsi; et vocem amici sponsi tunc audio, si sponso meo det gloriam, non sibi. Dicat amicus, Qui habet sponsam, sponsus est: amicus autem sponsi stat et audit eum, et gaudio gaudet propter vocem sponsi. Ecce habes Sacramenta, et ego concedo. Habes formam, sed sarmentum es de vite praecisum; tu formam ostendis, ego radicem quaero: de forma fructus non exit, nisi ubi est radix; ubi autem est radix, nisi in charitate? Et audi formam sarmentorum; Paulus loquatur: Si sciam, inquit, omnia sacramenta, et habeam omnem prophetiam et omnem fidem (et quantam fidem?), ita ut montes transferam, charitatem autem non habeam, nihil sum .

13.17 PL 35, 1501

17. Let no man tell you fables, then. “Pontius wrought a miracle; and Donatus prayed, and God answered him from heaven.” In the first place, either they are deceived, or they deceive. In the last place, grant that he removes mountains: “And have not charity,” saith the apostle, “I am nothing.” Let us see whether he has charity. I would believe that he had, if he had not divided unity. For against those whom I may call marvel-workers, my God has put me on my guard, saying, “In the last times there shall arise false prophets, doing signs and wonders, to lead into error, if it were possible, even the elect: Lo, I have foretold it to you.” Therefore the Bridegroom has cautioned us, that we ought not to be deceived even by miracles. Sometimes, indeed, a deserter frightens a plain countryman; but whether he is of the camp, and whether he is the better of that character with which he is marked, is what he who would not be frightened or seduced attends to. Let us then, my brethren, hold unity: without unity, even he who works miracles is nothing. The people Israel was in unity, and yet wrought no miracles: Pharaoh’s magicians were out of unity, and yet they wrought the like works as Moses.” The people Israel, as I have said, wrought no miracles. Who were saved with God—they who did, or they who did not, work miracles? The Apostle Peter raised a dead person: Simon Magus did many things: there were there certain Christians who were not able to do either what Peter did or what Simon did; and wherein did they rejoice? In this, that their names were written in heaven. For this is what our Lord Jesus Christ said to the disciples on their return, because of the faith of the Gentiles. The disciples, in truth, themselves said, boasting, “Behold, Lord, in Thy name even the devils are subject to us.” Rightly indeed they confessed, they brought the honor to the name of Christ; and yet what does He say to them? “Do not ye glory in this, that the devils are subject to you; but rejoice that your names are written in heaven.” Peter cast out devils. Some old widow, some lay person or other, having charity, and holding the integrity of faith, forsooth does not do this. Peter is the eye in the body, that man is the finger, yet is he in the same body in which Peter is; and if the finger has less power than the eye, yet it is not cut off from the body. Better is it to be a finger and to be in the body, than to be an eye and to be plucked out of the body.

Nemo ergo vobis fabulas vendat. Et Pontius fecit miraculum; et Donatus oravit, et respondit ei Deus de coelo. Primo, aut falluntur aut fallunt. Postremo, fac illum montes transferre: Charitatem autem, inquit, non habeam, nihil sum. Videamus utrum habuerit charitatem. Crederem, si non divisisset unitatem. Nam et contra istos, ut sic loquar, mirabiliarios cautum me fecit Deus meus, dicens: In novissimis temporibus exsurgent pseudoprophetae, facientes signa et prodigia, ut in errorem inducant, si fieri potest, etiam electos: ecce praedixi vobis . Ergo cautos nos fecit sponsus, quia et miraculis decipi non debemus. Aliquando enim et desertor terret provincialem; sed utrum in castris sit, et aliquid illi prosit character ille in quo signatus est, hoc attendit qui terreri et seduci non vult. Teneamus ergo unitatem, fratres mei: praeter unitatem, et qui facit miracula nihil est. In unitate enim erat populus Israel, et non faciebat miracula: praeter unitatem erant magi Pharaonis, et faciebant similia Moysi . Populus Israel, ut dixi, non faciebat: qui erant salvi apud Deum; qui faciebant, an qui non faciebant? Petrus apostolus resuscitavit mortuum ; Simon Magus fecit multa : erant ibi quidam christiani qui non poterant facere, nec quod faciebat Petrus, nec quod faciebat Simon; sed unde gaudebant? Quia nomina eorum erant scripta in coelo. Nam et redeuntibus discipulis, Dominus noster Jesus Christus propter fidem gentium hoc ait. Dixerunt enim gloriantes ipsi discipuli, Ecce, Domine, in nomine tuo etiam daemonia nobis subjecta sunt. Bene quidem confessi sunt, detulerunt honorem nomini Christi; et tamen quid ait eis? Nolite in hoc gloriari, quia daemonia vobis subjecta sunt; sed gaudete, quia nomina vestra scripta sunt in coelo . Petrus daemonia exclusit; nescio quae anicula vidua, nescio quis homo qualiscumque laicus habens charitatem, tenens integritatem fidei, non facit hoc: Petrus in corpore oculus est, ille in corpore digitus; in eo tamen corpore est, in quo et Petrus; et si minus valet digitus quam oculus, non est tamen praecisus a corpore. Melius est esse digitum et esse in corpore, quam esse oculum et evelli de corpore.

13.18 PL 35, 1501

18. Therefore, my brethren, let no man deceive you, let no man seduce you: love the peace of Christ, who was crucified for you, whilst He was God. Paul says, “Neither he that planteth is anything, neither he that watereth, but God who giveth the increase.” And does any of us say that he is something? If we say that we are something, and give not the glory to Him, we are adulterers; we desire ourselves to be loved, not the Bridegroom. Love ye Christ, and us in Him, in whom also you are beloved by us. Let the members love one another, but live all under the Head. With grief indeed, my brethren, I have been obliged to speak much, and yet I have said little: I have not been able to finish the passage; God will help us to finish it in due season. I did not wish to burden your hearts further; I wish them to be free for sighs and prayers in behalf of those who are still deaf and do not understand.

Proinde, fratres mei, nemo vos fallat, nemo vos seducat: amate pacem Christi, qui pro vobis crucifixus est, cum Deus esset. Paulus dicit, Neque qui plantat est aliquid, neque qui rigat, sed qui incrementum dat Deus . Et quisquam nostrum dicit quia aliquid est? Si dixerimus quia aliquid sumus, et non illi gloriam dederimus, adulteri sumus; nos amari volumus, non sponsum. Vos Christum diligite, et nos in illo, in quo et vos a nobis diligimini. Invicem se diligant membra, sed omnia sub capite vivant. Dolore quidem, fratres mei, multa coactus sum dicere, et parva dixi: lectionem finire non potui, aderit Dominus ut opportune finiatur. Nolui enim amplius onerare corda vestra, quae volo vacare gemitibus, et orationibus pro his qui adhuc surdi sunt, et non intelligunt.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Salva per dopo

Inserisci la tua email: ti invieremo un link per accedere. Nessuna password. Ciò che salvi (voci, versetti, capitoli, documenti) ti segue su ogni dispositivo.