Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 30

St Augustine of Hippo (AD 354–430) · In Joannis evangelium tractatus CXXIV · PL 35, 1379–1976

30.1 Chapter VII. 19–24 PL 35, 1632

1. The passage of the holy Gospel of which we have before discoursed to you, beloved, is followed by that of to-day, which has just now been read. Both the disciples and the Jews heard the Lord speaking; both men of truth and liars heard the Truth speaking; both friends and enemies heard Charity speaking; both good men and bad men heard the Good speaking. They heard, but He discerned; He saw and foresaw whom His discourse profited and would profit. Among those who were then, He saw; among us who were to be, He foresaw. Let us therefore hear the Gospel, just as if we were listening to the Lord Himself present: nor let us say, O happy they who were able to see Him! because there were many of them who saw, and also killed Him; and there are many among us who have not seen Him, and yet have believed. For the precious truth that sounded forth from the mouth of the Lord was both written for our sakes, and preserved for our sakes, and recited for our sakes, and will be recited also for the sake of our prosperity, even until the end of the world. The Lord is above; but the Lord, the Truth, is also here. For the body of the Lord, in which He rose again from the dead, can be only in one place; but His truth is everywhere diffused. Let us then hear the Lord, and let us also speak that which He shall have granted to us concerning His own words.

Evangelii sancti lectionem, de qua pridem Charitati vestrae locuti sumus, ista quae modo lecta est, hodierna consequitur. Dominum loquentem audiebant et discipuli et Judaei; veritatem loquentem audiebant, et veraces et mendaces; charitatem loquentem audiebant et amici et inimici; bonum loquentem audiebant et boni et mali. Illi audiebant, sed ille discernebat; et quibus sermo prodesset et profuturus esset, videbat et praevidebat. In illis enim qui tunc erant videbat, in nobis qui futuri eramus praevidebat. Nos itaque sic audiamus Evangelium, quasi praesentem Dominum; nec dicamus, O illi felices qui eum videre potuerunt! quia multi in eis qui viderunt, et occiderunt; multi autem in nobis qui non viderunt, et crediderunt. Quod enim pretiosum sonabat de ore Domini, et propter nos scriptum est, et nobis servatum, et propter nos recitatum, et recitabitur etiam propter posteros nostros, et donec saeculum finiatur. Sursum est Dominus: sed etiam hic est veritas Dominus. Corpus enim Domini in quo resurrexit, uno loco esse potest: veritas ejus ubique diffusa est. Dominum ergo audiamus, et quod ipse donaverit de verbis ejus, et nos dicamus.

30.2 PL 35, 1632

2. “Did not Moses,” saith He, “give you the law, and yet none of you doeth the law? Why do ye seek to kill me?” For ye seek to kill me just for this reason, that none of you doeth the law; for if ye did do the law, ye would recognize Christ in its very letters, and ye would not kill Him when present with you. And they answered: “The crowd answered Him;” answered as a tumultuous crowd, things not pertaining to order, but to confusion; in a word, the crowd was disturbed. See what answer it made: “Thou hast a devil: who seeks to kill thee?” As if it were not worse to say, “Thou hast a devil,” than to kill Him. To Him, indeed, was it said, that He had a devil, who was casting out devils. What else can a turbulent disorderly crowd say? What else can filth stirred up do but stink? The crowd was disturbed; by what? By the truth. For the eyes that have not soundness cannot endure the brightness of the light.

Nonne Moyses, inquit, dedit vobis Legem, et nemo ex vobis facit Legem? Quid me quaeritis interficere? Ideo enim quaeritis me interficere, quia nemo ex vobis facit Legem: nam si Legem faceretis, in ipsis litteris Christum agnosceretis, et praesentem non occideretis. Et illi responderunt: Respondit ei turba. Respondit quasi turba non pertinentia ad ordinem, sed ad perturbationem: denique turba turbata videte quid responderit: Daemonium habes; quis te quaerit occidere? Quasi non pejus fuerit dicere, Daemonium habes, quam eum occidere. Ei quippe dictum est quod daemonium haberet, qui daemones expellebat. Quid possit aliud dicere turba turbulenta? quid possit aliud olere coenum commotum? Turba turbata est; unde? A veritate. Turbam lippitudinis turbavit claritas lucis. Oculi enim non habentes sanitatem, non possunt ferre luminis claritatem.

30.3 PL 35, 1633

3. But the Lord, manifestly not disturbed, but calm in His truth, rendered not evil for evil nor railing for railing; although, if He were to say to these men, You have a devil, He would certainly be saying what was true. For they would not have said such things to the Truth, unless the falsehood of the devil had instigated them. What then did He answer? Let us calmly hear, and drink in the serene word: “I have done one work, and ye all marvel.” As if He said, What if ye were to see all my works? For they were His works which they saw in the world, and yet they saw not Him who made them all: He did one thing, and they were disturbed because he made a man whole on the Sabbath-day. As if, indeed, when any sick man recovered his health on the Sabbath-day, it had been any other that made such a man whole than He who offended them, because He made one man whole on the Sabbath-day. For who else has made others whole than He who is health itself,—He who gives even to the beasts that health which He gave to this man? For it was bodily health. The health of the flesh is repaired, and the flesh dies; and when it is repaired, death is only put off, not taken away. However, even that same health, brethren, is from the Lord, through whomsoever it may be given: by whose care and ministry soever it may be imparted, it is given by Him from whom all health is, to whom it is said in the psalm, “O Lord, Thou wilt save men and beasts; as Thou hast multiplied Thy mercy, O God.” For because Thou art God Thy multiplied mercy reaches even to the safety of human flesh, reaches even to the safety of dumb animals; but Thou who givest health of flesh common to men and beasts, is there no health which Thou reservest for men? There is certainly another which is not only not common to men and beasts, but to men themselves is not common to good and bad. In a word, when he had there spoken of this health which men and cattle receive in common, because of that health which men, but only the good, ought to hope for, he added as he went on: “But the sons of men shall put their trust under the cover of Thy wings. They shall be fully satisfied with the fatness of Thy house; and Thou shalt give them drink from the torrent of Thy pleasure. For with Thee is the fountain of life; and in Thy light shall they see light.” This is the health which belongs to good men, those whom he called “sons of men;” whilst he had said above, “O Lord, Thou shall save men and beasts.” How then? Were not those men sons of men, that after he had said men, he should go on and say, But the sons of men: as if men and sons of men meant different things? Yet I do not believe that the Holy Spirit had said this without some indication of distinction. The term men refers to the first Adam, sons of men to Christ. Perhaps, indeed, men relate to the first man; but sons of men relate to the Son of man.

Dominus autem non plane turbatus, sed in sua veritate tranquillus, non reddidit malum pro malo, nec maledictum pro maledicto . Quibus si diceret, Daemonium habetis vos; verum utique diceret. Non enim talia illi veritati dicerent, nisi eos diaboli falsitas irritaret. Quid ergo respondit? Audiamus tranquille, et tranquillum bibamus: Unum opus feci, et omnes miramini. Tanquam dicens, Quid si omnia opera mea videretis? Ipsius enim opera erant quae in mundo videbant, et ipsum qui fecit omnia non videbant: fecit unam rem, et turbati sunt, quia salvum fecit hominem sabbato. Quasi vero si quisquam aegrotus sabbato sinceraret, alius illum sanum fecisset quam ille, qui eos scandalizavit, quia unum hominem salvum fecit sabbato. Quis enim alius alios salvos fecit quam ipsa salus; qui illam salutem quam dedit huic homini, dat et jumentis? Salus enim corporalis erat. Salus carnis et reparatur, et moritur; et cum reparatur, mors differtur, non aufertur. Tamen, fratres, etiam ipsa salus a Domino est, per quemlibet detur: quocumque curante et ministrante impertiatur, ab illo datur a quo est omnis salus, cui dicitur in Psalmo, Homines et jumenta salvos facies, Domine; sicut multiplicasti misericordiam tuam, Deus. Quia enim Deus es, multiplicata misericordia tua pervenit etiam ad salutem carnis humanae, pervenit etiam ad salutem mutorum animalium: sed qui das salutem carnis hominibus jumentisque communem, numquid nulla salus est quam servas hominibus? Est certe alia quae non solum communis non est hominibus et jumentis, sed nec ipsis hominibus communis est bonis et malis. Denique cum ibi de ista salute dixisset, quam communiter accipiunt pecora et homines; propter illam salutem quam sperare debent homines, sed boni homines, secutus adjunxit, Filii autem hominum sub tegmine alarum tuarum sperabunt: inebriabuntur ab ubertate domus tuae, et torrente voluptatis tuae potabis eos; quoniam apud te est fons vitae, et in lumine tuo videbimus lumen . Haec est salus quae ad bonos pertinet, quos appellavit filios hominum; cum supra dixisset, Homines et jumenta salvos facies, Domine. Quid enim? illi homines non erant filii hominum, ut cum dixisset, Homines, sequeretur et diceret, Filii autem hominum; quasi aliud erant homines, et aliud filii hominum? Non tamen arbitror sine aliqua significatione distinctionis hoc dixisse Spiritum sanctum. Homines ad primum Adam, filii hominum ad Christum. Forte enim homines pertinent ad primum hominem: filii autem hominum pertinent ad Filium hominis.

30.4 PL 35, 1634

4. “I have done one work, and ye all marvel.” And immediately He subjoined: “Moses therefore gave unto you circumcision.” It was well done that ye received circumcision from Moses. “Not that it is of Moses, but of the fathers;” since it was Abraham that first received circumcision from the Lord. “And ye circumcise on the Sabbath-day.” Moses has convicted you: ye have received in the law to circumcise on the eighth day; ye have received in the law to cease from labor on the seventh day; if the eighth day from the child’s birth fall on the seventh day of the week, what will ye do? Will ye abstain from work to keep the Sabbath, or will ye circumcise to fulfill the sacrament of the eighth day? But I know, saith He, what ye do. “Ye circumcise a man.” Why? Because circumcision relates to what is a kind of seal of salvation, and men ought not to abstain from the work of salvation on the Sabbath-day. Therefore be ye not “angry with me, because I have made a man every whit whole on the Sabbath-day.” “If,” saith He, “a man on the Sabbath-day receiveth circumcision that the law should not be broken” (for it was something saving that was ordained by Moses in that ordinance of circumcision), why are ye angry at me for working a healing on the Sabbath-day?

Unum opus feci, et omnes miramini. Et continuo subjungit: Propterea Moyses dedit vobis circumcisionem. Bene factum est ut acciperetis circumcisionem a Moyse. Non quia ex Moyse est, sed ex Patribus. Abraham quippe primus accepit circumcisionem a Domino . Et in sabbato circumciditis. Convicit vos Moyses: in Lege accepistis ut circumcidatis octavo die ; accepistis in Lege ut vacetis septimo die : si octavus dies illius qui natus est occurret ad diem septimum sabbati, quid facietis? Vacabitis, ut servetis sabbatum; an circumcidetis, ut impleatis sacramentum diei octavi? Sed novi, inquit, quid faciatis. Circumciditis hominem. Quare? Quia circumcisio pertinet ad aliquod signaculum salutis, et non debent homines sabbato vacare a salute. Ergo nec mihi irascamini, quia salvum feci totum hominem sabbato: si circumcisionem, inquit, accipit homo in sabbato, ut non solvatur lex Moysi (aliquid enim per Moysen in illa constitutione circumcisionis salubriter institutum est), mihi operanti salutem in sabbato quare indignamini?

30.5 PL 35, 1634

5. Perhaps, indeed, that circumcision pointed to the Lord Himself, at whom they were indignant, because He worked cures and healing. For circumcision was commanded to be applied on the eighth day: and what is circumcision but the spoiling of the flesh? This circumcision, then, signified the removal of carnal lusts from the heart. Therefore not without cause was it given, and ordered to be made in that member; since by that member the creature of mortal kind is procreated. By one man came death, just as by one man the resurrection of the dead; and by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin. Therefore every man is born with a foreskin, because every man is born with the vice of propagation; and God cleanses not, either from the vice with which we are born, or from the vices which we add thereto by ill living, except by the stony knife, the Lord Christ. For Christ was the Rock. Now they used to circumcise with stone knives, and by the name of rock they prefigured Christ; and yet when He was present with them they did not acknowledge Him, but besides, they sought to kill Him. But why on the eighth day, unless because after the seventh day of the week the Lord rose again on the Lord’s day? Therefore Christ’s resurrection, which happened on the third day indeed of His passion, but on the eighth day in the days of the week, that same resurrection it is that doth circumcise us. Hear of those that were circumcised with the real stone, while the apostle admonishes them: “If then ye be risen with Christ, seek those things which are above, where Christ is, sitting on the right hand of God; set your affection on things above, not on things on the earth.” He speaks to the circumcised: Christ has risen; He has taken away from you carnal desires, evil lusts, the superfluity with which you were born, and that far worse which you had added thereto by ill living; being circumcised by the Rock, why do you still set your affections on the earth? And finally, for that “Moses gave you the law, and ye circumcise a man on the Sabbath-day,” understand that by this is signified the good work which I have done, in that I have made a man every whit whole on the Sabbath-day; because he was cured that he might be whole in body, and also he believed that he might be whole in soul.

Forte enim illa circumcisio ipsum Dominum significabat, cui isti curanti et sananti indignabantur. Jussa est enim adhiberi octavo die circumcisio: et quid est circumcisio, nisi carnis exspoliatio? Significat ergo ista circumcisio exspoliationem a corde cupiditatum carnalium. Non ergo sine causa data est, et in eo membro jussa fieri; quoniam per illud membrum procreatur creatura mortalium. Et per unum hominem mors, sicut per unum hominem resurrectio mortuorum : et per unum hominem peccatum intravit in mundum, et per peccatum mors . Ideo quisque cum praeputio nascitur, quia omnis homo cum vitio propaginis nascitur: et non mundat Deus sive a vitio cum quo nascimur, sive a vitiis quae male vivendo addimus, nisi per cultellum petrinum, Dominum Christum. Petra enim erat Christus . Cultellis enim petrinis circumcidebant, et petrae nomine Christum figurabant: et praesentem non agnoscebant, sed insuper eum occidere cupiebant. Quare autem octavo die, nisi quia post septimum sabbati Dominus die dominico resurrexit? Ergo resurrectio Christi, quae facta est tertio quidem die passionis, sed octavo die in diebus hebdomadis, ipsa nos circumcidit. Audi circumcisos vera petra, Apostolo admonente: Si ergo resurrexistis cum Christo; quae sursum sunt quaerite, ubi Christus est in dextera Dei sedens; quae sursum sunt sapite, non quae super terram (Coloss. III, 1, 2). Circumcisis loquitur: Resurrexit Christus, abstulit vobis desideria carnalia, abstulit concupiscentias malas, abstulit superfluum cum quo nati eratis, et multo pejus quod male vivendo addideratis; circumcisi per petram quare adhuc sapitis terram? Et ad extremum quia Legem dedit Moyses, et circumciditis hominem sabbato, intelligite hoc significari opus bonum, quod ego feci totum hominem salvum sabbato; quia et curatus est ut sanus esset in corpore, et credidit ut sanus esset in anima.

30.6 PL 35, 1635

6. “Judge not according to personal appearance, but judge righteous judgment.” What is this? Just now, you who by the law of Moses circumcise on the Sabbath-day are not angry with Moses; and because I made a man whole on the Sabbath-day you are angry with me. You judge by the person; give heed to the truth. I do not prefer myself to Moses, says the Lord, who was also the Lord of Moses. So consider us as you would two men, as both men; judge between us, but judge a true judgment; do not condemn him by honoring me, but honor me by understanding him. For this He said to them in another place: “If ye believed Moses ye would certainly believe me also, for he wrote of me.” But in this place He willed not to say this, Himself and Moses being as it were placed before these men for judgment. Because of Moses’ law you circumcise, even when it happens to be the Sabbath-day, and will ye not that I should show the beneficence of healing during the Sabbath? For the Lord of circumcision and the Lord of the Sabbath is the same who is the Author of health; and they are servile works that ye are forbidden to do on the Sabbath; if ye really understand what servile works are, ye sin not. For he that committeth sin is the servant of sin. Is it a servile work to heal a man on the Sabbath-day? Ye do eat and drink (to infer somewhat from the admonition of our Lord Jesus Christ, and from His words); at any rate, why do ye eat and drink on the Sabbath, but because that what ye do pertains to health? By this ye show that the works of health are not in any wise to be omitted on the Sabbath. Therefore “do not judge by person, but judge righteous judgment.” Consider me as ye would a man; consider Moses as a man: if ye will judge according to the truth, ye will condemn neither Moses nor me; and when ye know the truth ye will know me, because I am the Truth.

Nolite judicare personaliter, sed rectum judicium judicate. Quid est hoc? Modo qui per legem Moysi circumciditis sabbato, non irascimini Moysi; et quia ego die sabbati salvum feci hominem, irascimini mihi. Personaliter judicatis, veritatem attendite. Ego non me praefero Moysi, ait Dominus, qui erat et ipsius Moysi Dominus. Sic attendite quomodo homines nos duos, tanquam ambos homines: judicate inter nos, sed verum judicium judicate; nolite me honorato illum damnare, sed illo intellecto me honorate. Hoc enim eis alio loco dixit: Si crederetis Moysi, crederetis utique et mihi; de me enim ille scripsit . Sed hoc loco noluit hoc dicere, tanquam se et Moyse ante illos constitutis. Propter legem Moysi circumciditis, quando etiam sabbatum occurrerit; et ego sanitatum faciendarum beneficentiam non vultis ut exhibeam per sabbatum? Quia Dominus circumcisionis et Dominus sabbati, salutis est auctor: et servilia opera prohibiti estis facere sabbato; si vere intelligatis servilia opera, non peccatis. Qui enim facit peccatum, servus est peccati . Numquid servile opus est, hominem sanare per sabbatum? Manducatis et bibitis (ut aliquid dicam ex admonitione Domini nostri Jesu Christi, et ex verbis ejus); utique quare manducatis et bibitis in sabbato, nisi quia pertinet ad salutem quod facitis? Per hoc ostenditis opera salutis non esse ullo modo die sabbati omittenda. Ergo nolite personaliter judicare, sed rectum judicium judicate. Attendite me quomodo hominem, attendite Moysen quomodo hominem: si secundum veritatem judicetis, neque Moysen, neque me condemnabitis; et veritate cognita me cognoscetis, quia ego sum veritas .

30.7 PL 35, 1635

7. It requires great labor in this world, brethren to get clear of the vice which the Lord has noted in this place, so as not to judge by appearance, but to keep right judgment. The Lord, indeed, admonished the Jews, but He warned us also; them He convicted, us He instructed; them He reproved, us He encouraged. Let us not imagine that this was not said to us, simply because we were not there at that time. It was written, it is read; when it was recited we heard it; but we heard it as said to the Jews; let us not place ourselves behind ourselves and watch Him reproving enemies, while we ourselves do that which the truth may reprove in us. The Jews indeed judged by appearance, but for that reason they belong not to the New Testament, they have not the kingdom of heaven in Christ, nor are joined to the society of the holy angels; they sought earthly things of the Lord; for a land of promise, victory over enemies, fruitfulness of child-bearing, increase of children, abundance of fruit,—all which things were indeed promised to them by God, the True and the Good, promised to them, however, as unto carnal men,—all these things made for them the Old Testament. What is the Old Testament? The inheritance, as it were, belonging to the old man. We have been renewed, have been made a new man, because He who is the new man has come. What is so new as to be born of a virgin? Therefore, because there was not in Him what instruction might renew, because He had no sin, there was given Him a new origin of birth. In Him a new birth, in us a new man. What is a new man? A man renewed from oldness. Renewed unto what? Unto desiring heavenly things, unto longing for things eternal, unto earnestly seeking the country which is above and fears no foe, where we do not lose a friend nor fear an enemy; where we live with good affection, without any want; where no longer any advances, because none fails; where no man is born, because no man dies; where there is no hungering nor thirsting; where immortality is fullness, and truth our aliment. Having these promises, and pertaining to the New Testament, and being made heirs of a new inheritance, and co-heirs of the Lord Himself, we have a far different hope from theirs: let us not judge by appearance, but hold right judgment.

Hoc vitium, fratres, quod Dominus notavit hoc loco, evadere in hoc saeculo magni laboris est, non personaliter judicare, sed rectum judicium retinere. Admonuit quidem Dominus Judaeos, sed monuit et nos: illos convicit, nos instruxit; illos redarguit, nos exacuit. Non putemus hoc nobis non ideo dictum, quia tunc ibi non fuimus. Scriptum est, legitur, cum recitaretur audivimus; sed tanquam Judaeis dictum audivimus: non nos ponamus post nos, et quasi intueamur inimicos reprehendere, et ipsi nos faciamus quod in nobis veritas ipsa reprehendat. Judaei quidem personaliter judicabant, sed ideo non pertinent ad Novum Testamentum, ideo non habent in Christo regnum coelorum, ideo non junguntur sanctorum societati Angelorum: terrena quaerebant a Domino; terra enim promissionis, victoria ab inimicis, fecunditas pariendi, multiplicatio filiorum, abundantia fructuum, quae illis omnia a Deo quidem vero et bono, tamen ut carnalibus promissa sunt, omnia haec fecerunt illis Vetus Testamentum. Quid est Vetus Testamentum? Quasi haereditas pertinens ad hominem veterem. Nos innovati sumus, homo novus facti sumus; quia et ille homo novus venit. Quid tam novum quam nasci de virgine? Quia ergo non erat quid in illo innovaret praeceptum, quia nullum habebat peccatum; novus partus est datus. In illo partus novus, in nobis homo novus. Quid est homo novus? A vetustate innovatus. Ad quam rem innovatus? Ad desideranda coelestia, ad concupiscenda sempiterna, ad patriam quae sursum est et hostem non timet, desiderandam, ubi non perdimus amicum, non timemus inimicum; ubi vivimus cum bono affectu, sine ullo defectu; ubi nemo nascitur, quia nemo moritur; ubi nemo jam proficit, et nemo deficit; ubi non esuritur, et non sititur, sed satietas est immortalitas, et cibus veritas. Haec habentes promissa, et ad Novum Testamentum pertinentes, et novae haereditatis facti haeredes, et ipsius Domini cohaeredes, aliam spem valde habemus: non personaliter judicemus, sed rectum judicium teneamus.

30.8 PL 35, 1636

8. Who is he that judges not according to the person? He that loves equally. Equal love causes that persons be not accepted. It is not when we honor men in diverse measure according to their degrees that we ought to fear lest we are accepting persons. For where we judge between two, and at times between relations, sometimes it happens that judgment has to be made between father and son; the father complains of a bad son, or the son complains of a harsh father; we regard the honor which is due to the father from the son; we do not make the son equal to the father in honor, but we give him preference if he has a good cause: let us regard the son on an equality with the father in the truth, and thus shall we bestow the honor due, so that equity destroy not merit. Thus we profit by the words of the Lord, and that we may profit, we are assisted by His grace.

Quis est qui non judicat personaliter? Qui diligit aequaliter. Dilectio aequalis facit non acceptari personas. Non cum homines diverso modo pro suis gradibus honoramus, tunc timendum est ne personas accipiamus. Sed quando inter duos judicamus, et aliquando inter necessarios, fit nonnunquam judicium inter patrem et filium; queritur pater de malo filio, aut queritur filius de duro patre: servamus honorificentiam patri, quae debetur a filio; non aequamus filium patri in honore; sed praeponimus, si bonam causam habet: filium aequemus patri in veritate; et sic tribuemus honorem debitum, ut non perdat aequitas meritum. Ita verbis Domini proficimus, et ut proficiamus gratia illius adjuvamur.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Save for later

Enter your email and we will send you a sign-in link. No password. What you save (articles, verses, chapters, documents) follows you to any device.