Sermons on Selected Lessons of the New Testament 95
95.0 On the words of the Gospel, John xvi. 24, ‘Hitherto have ye asked nothing in my name;’ and on the words of Luke x. 17, ‘Lord, even the demons are subject unto us in thy name.’ PL 38, 791
95.1 On the words of the Gospel, John xvi. 24, ‘Hitherto have ye asked nothing in my name;’ and on the words of Luke x. 17, ‘Lord, even the demons are subject unto us in thy name.’ PL 38, 791
1. When the Holy Gospel was being read, we heard what in truth ought at once to put every earnest soul in motion to seek, not to faint. For whoso is not moved, is not changed. But there is a dangerous movement, of which it is written, “Suffer not my feet to be moved.” But there is another movement of him who seeketh, knocketh, asketh. What then has been read we have all heard; but I suppose we have not all understood. It makes mention of that which together with me ye should seek, with me ask, for the receiving of which ye should with me knock. For as I hope the grace of the Lord will be with us, that whereas I wish to minister to you, I too may be thought worthy to receive. What is it, I pray you, that we have just heard that the Lord said to His disciples? “Hitherto have ye asked nothing in My Name.” Is He not speaking to those disciples, who, after He had sent them, having given them power to preach the Gospel, and to do mighty works, returned with joy, and said to Him, “Lord, even the devils are subject unto us through Thy Name”? Ye recognise, ye recollect this which I have quoted from the Gospel, which in every passage and every sentence speaketh truth, nowhere false, nowhere deceiveth. How then is it true, “Hitherto have ye asked nothing in My Name”? and, “Lord, even the devils are subject unto us through Thy name”? Of a surety this puts the mind in motion to ascertain the secret of this difficulty. Therefore ask we, seek, knock. Be there in us faithful godliness, not a restlessness of the flesh, but a submission of the mind, that He who seeth us knocking may open unto us.
Locus Joannis quomodo conciliandus cum verbis Lucae. Sanctum Evangelium cum legeretur, audivimus quod modo vere debeat omnem intentam animam movere ad quaerendum, non ad deficiendum. Qui enim non movetur, nec mutatur. Sed est motus periculosus, de quo scriptum est, Ne des ad movendum pedes meos . Motus autem alius est quaerentis, pulsantis, petentis. Quod ergo lectum est omnes audivimus: sed puto quia non omnes intelleximus. Commemorat quod mecum quaeratis, mecum petatis, pro quo accipiendo mecum pulsetis. Aderit enim, sicut speramus, gratia Domini, ut, cum volo vobis ministrare, et ego merear accipere. Quid est, obsecro vos, quod Dominum dixisse modo audivimus discipulis suis: Usque nunc nihil petiistis in nomine meo? Nonne illis discipulis loquitur, quos cum misisset, data potestate ad praedicandum Evangelium et magnalia facienda, reversi sunt gaudentes et dixerunt ei: Domine, ecce in nomine tuo et daemonia nobis subjecta sunt? Recognoscitis, recolitis, quod de Evangelio commemoravi, in omni loco et omni sententia veridico, nusquam falso, nusquam fallente. Quomodo ergo verum est, Usque modo nihil petiistis in nomine meo; et, Domine, ecce in nomine tuo et daemonia nobis subjecta sunt? Movet certe animum, ad cognoscendum quaestionis hujus secretum. Ergo petamus, quaeramus, pulsemus. Hoc in nobis fidelis pietas, non carnis inquietudo, sed animi subjectio; ut ille nobis aperiat, qui nos videt pulsantes.
95.2 PL 38, 791
2. What the Lord then may give to be ministered unto you, do ye with earnest attention, that is, with hunger, receive; and when I shall have spoken it, ye will doubtless with sound taste approve what is placed before you out of the Lord’s store. The Lord Jesus knew whereby the soul of man, that is, the rational mind, made after the image of God, could be satisfied: only, that is, by Himself. This He knew, and knew that it was as yet without that fulness. He knew that He was manifest, and He knew that He was hidden. He knew what in Him was exhibited, what concealed. He knew all this. “How great,” says the Psalm, “is the multitude of Thy sweetness, O Lord, which Thou hast hidden to them that fear Thee; which Thou hast wrought for them that hope in Thee!” “Thy sweetness” both great and manifold “hast Thou hidden to them that fear Thee.” If thou hidest it to them that fear Thee, to whom dost Thou open it? “Thou hast wrought it for them that hope in Thee.” A twofold question has arisen, but either is solved by the other. If any one inquires after the other, what is this, “Thou hast hidden it to them that fear Thee; wrought it for them that hope in Thee”? Are they that fear, and they that hope, different? Do not the very same who fear God, hope in God? Who hopeth on Him who doth not fear Him? Who in a godly sort feareth Him, and hath not hope in Him? Let this then first be solved. Somewhat would I say concerning those who hope and those who fear.
Timentibus absconditur dulcedo Dei, revelatur sperantibus. Quid ergo det Dominus ministrandum vobis, intenti, hoc est, esurientes accipite: quod cum dixero, sine dubio probabitis sanis faucibus cordis quod de cellario dominico vobis apponatur. Dominus Jesus sciebat unde posset anima humana, hoc est, mens rationalis ad imaginem Dei facta satiari, tanquam ipsa eo ipso satietur. Noverat hoc, et illam ea plenitudine adhuc carere sciebat. Noverat se apparere, noverat se latere. Sciebat quid in illo demonstraretur, quid absconderetur. Noverat hoc. Quam multa, inquit Psalmus, multitudo dulcedinis tuae, Domine, quam abscondisti timentibus te, perfecisti autem sperantibus in te . Dulcedinem tuam et magnam et multam abscondisti timentibus te. Si timentibus te abscondis, quibus aperis? Perfecisti sperantibus in te. Quaestio gemina nata est, sed alterutra solvitur ex altera. Alterum si quis inquirat, quid est hoc, Abscondisti timentibus te, perfecisti sperantibus in te? Alii timent, alii sperant? non ii ipsi sunt timentes Deum, sperantes in Deum? Quis in eum sperat, qui non eum timet? Quis eum pie timet, et in eum spem non habet? Ergo prius ista solvatur. De sperantibus et timentibus volo aliquid dicere.
95.3 PL 38, 791
3. The Law hath fear, Grace hope. But what difference is there between the Law and Grace, since the Giver both of the Law and Grace is One? The Law alarmeth him who relieth on himself, Grace assisteth him who trusteth in God. The Law, I say, alarmeth; do not make light of this because it is brief; weigh it well, and it is considerable. Look well at what I have said, take what we minister, prove wherefrom we take it. The Law alarmeth him who relieth on himself, Grace assisteth him who trusteth in God. What saith the Law? Many things: and who can enumerate them? I bring forward one small and short precept from it which the Apostle hath brought forward, a very small one; let us see who is sufficient for it. “Thou shalt not lust.” What is this, Brethren? We have heard the Law; if there be no grace, thou hast heard thy punishment. Why dost thou boast to me whosoever thou art that hearing this dost rely upon thyself, why dost thou boast to me of innocence? Why dost thou flatter thyself thereupon? Thou canst say, “I have not plundered the goods of others;” I hear, I believe, perhaps I even see it, thou dost not plunder the goods of others. Thou hast heard, “Thou shalt not lust.” “I do not go in to another man’s wife;” this again I hear, believe, see. Thou hast heard, “Thou shalt not lust.” Why dost thou inspect thyself all round without, and dost not inspect within? Look in, and thou wilt see another law in thy members. Look in, why dost thou pass over thyself? Descend into thine own self. Thou wilt “see another law in thy members resisting the law of thy mind, and bringing thee into captivity in the law of sin which is in thy members.” With good reason then is the sweetness of God hidden to thee. The law placed in thy members, resisting the law of thy mind, bringeth thee into captivity. Of that sweetness which to thee is hidden, the holy Angels drink; thou canst not drink and taste that sweetness, captive as thou art. “Thou hadst not known concupiscence, unless the Law had said, Thou shalt not lust.” Thou heardest, fearedst, didst try to fight, couldest not overcome. For “sin taking occasion by the commandment wrought death.” Surely ye recognise them, they are the Apostle’s words. “Sin taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence.” Why didst thou vaunt thyself in thy pride? Lo, with thine own arms hath the enemy conquered thee. Thou verily, didst look for a commandment as a defence: and, lo, by the commandment the enemy hath found an occasion of entering in. “For sin taking occasion by the commandment,” he saith, “deceived me, and by it slew me.” What means what I said, “With thine own arms hath the enemy conquered thee”? Hear the same Apostle going on, and saying; “Wherefore the Law indeed is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.” Make answer now to the revilers of the Law: make answer on the Apostle’s authority, “The commandment is holy, the Law holy, the commandment just and good. Was then that which is good, made death unto me? God forbid! But sin that it might appear sin, by that which is good wrought death in me.” Why is this but because on receiving the commandment thou didst fear, not love? Thou fearedst punishment, thou didst not love righteousness. Whoso feareth punishment, wisheth, if it were possible, to do what pleaseth him, and not to have what he feareth. God forbiddeth adultery, thou hast coveted another’s wife, thou dost not go in unto her, thou dost not do so, opportunity is given thee, thou hast time, a favourable place is open, witnesses are absent, yet thou dost not do it, wherefore? Because thou fearest the punishment. But no one will know it. Will not God know it? So it is clear, because God knoweth what thou art about to do, thou doest it not; but here thou fearest the threatenings of God, not lovest His commandments. Why dost thou not do it? Because if thou do, thou wilt be cast into hell fire. It is the fire thou fearest. O if thou didst love chastity, thou wouldest not do it, even though thou mightest be altogether unpunished. If God were to say to thee, “Lo, do it, I will not condemn thee, I will not condemn thee to hell fire, but I will withhold My Face from thee.” If thou did it not because of this threat, it would be from the love of God that thou didst not do it, not from the fear of judgment. But thou wouldest do it, perhaps I mean thou wouldest do so; for it is not my place to judge. If thou do it not on this principle because thou abhorrest the contamination of adultery, because thou lovest His precepts, that thou mayest obtain His promises, and not because thou fearest His condemnation, it is the grace which maketh saints that aideth thee; it is all of grace, ascribe it not to thine own self, attribute it not to thine own strength. Thou actest from delight in it, well; thou actest in charity, well; I assent, I agree. Charity worketh by thee, when thou actest with thy will. At once dost thou taste sweetness, if thou hope on the Lord.
Timor sub Lege, spes sub gratia. Lex timorem habet, gratia spem. Quid autem interest inter Legem et gratiam, quandoquidem unus dator et Legis et gratiae? Lex terret de se ipso praesumentem, gratia adjuvat in Deum sperantem. Lex, inquam, terret: nolite contemnere, quia breve est; appendite, et magnum est. Videte quid dixerim, sumite quod ministramus, probate unde sumamus. Lex terret de se ipso praesumentem, gratia adjuvat in Deum sperantem. Quid dicit Lex? Multa, et quis enumerat? Unum praeceptum parvum et modicum inde commemoro, quod commemoravit Apostolus, valde parvum: videamus quis supportat. Non concupisces. Quid est, fratres? Audivimus Legem; si gratia non sit, poenam tuam audisti. Quid mihi jactas, quisquis audiens hoc de te praesumis, quid mihi jactas innocentiam? Quid tibi de illa blandiris? Potes dicere, Non rapui res alienas: audio, credo, fortassis et video; non rapis res alienas, Non concupisces, audisti. Non accedo ad uxorem alienam: et hoc audio, credo, video. Non concupisces, audisti. Quid te foris circumspicis, et non intus inspicis? Inspice, et videbis aliam legem in membris tuis. Intus inspice, quid transis te? Descende in te. Videbis aliam legem in membris tuis repugnantem legi mentis tuae, et captivantem te in lege peccati, quae est in membris tuis. Merito tibi absconditur dulcedo Dei. Captivat te lex posita in membris tuis, repugnans legi mentis tuae. De dulcedine illa quae tibi absconditur, sancti Angeli bibunt: non potes dulcedinem pati et gustare captivus. Concupiscentiam nesciebas, nisi Lex diceret, Non concupisces. Audisti, timuisti; tentasti pugnare, non potuisti superare. Occasione enim accepta, peccatum per mandatum operatum est mortem. Certe recognoscitis, Apostoli verba sunt, Occasione accepta peccatum per mandatum operatum est in me omnem concupiscentiam. Quid te jactabas superbus? Ecce armis tuis te vicit inimicus. Tu certe mandatum quaerebas ad monitionem: ecce per mandatum invenit hostis intrandi occasionem. Occasione enim accepta, peccatum per mandatum fefellit, inquit, me, et per eum occidit. Quid est quod dixi, Armis tuis te vicit inimicus? Audi eumdem apostolum sequentem et dicentem: Itaque Lex quidem sancta, et mandatum sanctum et justum et bonum. Jam responde reprehensoribus Legis: Apostoli auctoritate responde, Mandatum sanctum, lex sancta, mandatum justum et bonum. Quod ergo bonum est, mihi factum est mors? Absit: sed peccatum ut appareat, per bonum mihi operatum est mortem . Quare hoc, nisi quia mandato accepto timuisti, non dilexisti? Timuisti poenam, non amasti justitiam. Qui timet poenam, optat si fieri potest, facere quod libeat, et non habere quod timeat. Prohibet Deus adulterium; concupisti uxorem alienam, non accedis, non facis, occasio data est, habes tempus, patet locus, deest conscius, tu tamen non facis; unde? Quia times poenam. Sed nullus sciet. Numquid nec Deus? Ita plane, quia scit Deus quod facturus es, non facis: sed et ipsum Deum minantem tremis, non praecipientem diligis. Quare non facis? Quia si feceris, in gehennam mitteris. Ignem times. O si castitatem amares, non faceres, etsi omni modo impunitus esse deberes. Si tibi Deus diceret, Ecce fac, non te damnabo; in gehennam te non damnabo, sed faciem meam tibi negabo. Si propter hanc comminationem non faceres, amore Dei non faceres, timore judicii. Sed faceres, forte enim sic faceres: non enim meum est judicare. Adjuvat gratia, quae sanctos facit, si sic non facis, quia horres contaminationem adulterii, quia diligis praeceptorem, ut exigas promissorem, non quia times damnatorem: jam gratiae est, hoc tibi noli assumere, viribus tuis noli tribuere. Delectatione facis, bene; charitate facis, bene; annuo, consentio. Charitas de te operatur, quando volens facis. Jam gustas dulcedinem, si speras in Dominum.
95.4 PL 38, 793
4. But whence hast thou this charity, if yet thou hast it? for I am afraid lest even yet it is through fear thou doest it not, and lest thou seem great in thine own eyes. Now if it is through charity that thou doest it not, thou art truly great. Hast thou charity? “I have,” you say. Whence? “From myself.” Far art thou from sweetness, if thou hast it from thine own self. Thou wilt love thine own self, because thou wilt love that from which thou hast it. But I will convict thee that thou hast it not. For in that thou dost think that thou hast so great a thing from thine own self, by that very fact I do not believe thou hast it. For if thou hadst, thou wouldest know from whence thou hadst it. Hast thou charity from thyself, as if it were some light, some little thing? “If thou shouldest speak with the tongues of men and Angels, but have not charity, thou wouldest be a sounding brass and a tinkling cymbal. If thou shouldest know all mysteries, and have all knowledge, and all prophecy, and all faith so that thou couldest remove mountains, but not have charity,” these things could not profit thee. “If thou shouldest distribute all thy goods to the poor, and deliver up thy body to be burned, but not have charity, thou wouldest be nothing.” How great is this charity, which if it be wanting, all things profit nothing! Compare it not to thy faith, not to thy knowledge, not to thy gift of tongues, to lesser things, to the eye of thy body, the hand, the foot, the belly, to any one lowest member compare charity, are these least things to be in any way compared to charity? So then the eye and nose thou hast from God, and hast thou charity from thine own self? If thou hast given thyself charity which surpasseth all things, thou hast made God of light account with thee. What more can God give thee? Whatever He may have given, is less. Charity which thou hast given thyself, surpasseth all things. But if thou hast it, thou hast not given it to thyself. “For what hast thou which thou hast not received?” Who gave to me, who gave to thee? God. Acknowledge Him in His gifts, that thou feel not His condemnation. By believing the Scriptures, God hath given thee charity, a great boon, charity, which surpasseth all things. God gave it thee, “because the charity of God hath been shed abroad in our hearts;” by thine own self, perhaps? God forbid; “by the Holy Ghost, who hath been given us.”
Charitas non ex nobis, sed ex Deo. Sed unde tibi ista charitas? si tamen est: timeo enim ne adhuc timendo non facias, et magnus tibi videaris. Jam si charitate non facis, vere magnus es. Habes charitatem? Habeo, inquis. Unde? A me ipso. Longe es a dulcedine, si a te ipso habes. Teipsum amabis; quia unde habes amabis. Sed convinco quod non habes. Quod enim putas a te ipso habere rem tantam, inde non credo quod habeas. Si enim haberes, scires unde haberes. Charitatem a te habes, quasi leve aliquid, quasi breve aliquid? Si linguis hominum loquereris et Angelorum, charitatem autem non haberes, aeramentum esses tinniens et cymbalum concrepans. Si scires omnia sacramenta et omnem haberes scientiam, omnem prophetiam et omnem fidem, ita ut montes transferres, charitatem autem non haberes, prodesse tibi ista non possent. Si distribueres omnia tua pauperibus, et traderes corpus tuum ut arderes, charitatem autem non haberes, nihil esses . Quanta est ista charitas, quae si defuerit, nihil prosunt omnia? Compara eam non fidei tuae, non scientiae tuae, non linguae tuae; minoribus rebus, oculo corporis tui, manui, pedi, ventri, alicui membro extremo compara charitatem; numquid ex aliqua parte ista minima charitati sunt comparanda? Ergo oculum et nasum a Deo habes, et charitatem a te habes? Si charitatem, quae superat omnia, tu tibi dedisti, vilem tibi Deum fecisti. Quid tibi plus potest dare Deus? Quidquid dederit, minus est. Omnia charitas vincit, quam tu tibi dedisti. Sed si habes, non tibi dedisti. Quid enim habes, quod non accepisti ? Quis mihi, quis tibi dedit? Deus. Agnosce datorem, ne sentias damnatorem. Credendo de Scripturis Deus tibi dedit charitatem, magnum bonum, charitatem omnia superantem. Deus tibi dedit: quia charitas Dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris; forte a te? absit; per Spiritum sanctum qui datus est nobis .
95.5 PL 38, 793
5. Return with me to that captive, return with me to my proposition. “The Law alarmeth him that relieth on himself, grace assisteth him who trusteth in God.” For look at that captive. “He seeth another law in his members resisting the law of his mind, and leading him captive in the law of sin, which is in his members.” Lo, he is bound, lo, he is dragged along, lo, he is led captive, lo, he is subjected. What hath that profited him, “Thou shalt not lust”? He hath heard, “Thou shalt not lust;” that he might know his enemy, not that he might overcome him. “For he had not known concupiscence,” that is, his enemy, “unless the Law had said, Thou shalt not lust.” Now thou hast seen the enemy, fight, deliver thyself, make good thy liberty, let the suggestions of pleasure be kept down, unlawful delight be utterly destroyed. Arm thyself, thou hast the Law, march on, conquer if thou canst. For what good is it that through the little portion of God’s grace thou hast already, thou “delightest in the Law of God after the inward man? But thou seest another law in thy members resisting the law of thy mind;” not “resisting” yet powerless for aught, but “leading thee captive in the law of sin.” Behold, whence to thee who fearest that “plentifulness of sweetness is hidden!” to him that feareth it “is hidden,” how is it” wrought” out for him that “trusteth”? Cry out under thine enemy, for that thou hast an assailant, thou hast an Helper too, who looketh upon thee as thou fightest, who helpeth thee in difficulty; but only if He find thee “trusting;” for the proud He hateth. What then wilt thou cry under this enemy? “Wretched man that I am!” Ye see it already, for ye have cried out. Be this your cry, when haply thou art distressed under the enemy, say ye, in your inmost heart say, in sound faith say, “Wretched man that I am!” Wretched that I am! “Therefore wretched,” because “I.” “Wretched man that I am,” both because “I,” and because “man.” For “he is disquieted in vain.” For though “man walketh in the Image;” yet, “wretched man that I am, who shall deliver me from the body of this death?” Wilt thou thyself? where is thy strength, where is thy confidence? Of a surety thou both criest out, and art silent; silent, that is, from extolling thyself, not from calling upon God. Be silent, and cry out. For God Himself too is both silent, and crieth aloud; He is silent from judgment, He is not silent from precept; so be thou too silent from elation, not from invocation; lest God say to thee, “I have been silent, shall I be silent always?” Cry out therefore, “O wretched man that I am!” Acknowledge thyself conquered, put thine own strength to shame, and say, “Wretched man that I am, who shall deliver me from the body of this death?” What did I say above? The Law alarmeth him that relieth upon himself. Behold, man relied upon himself, he attempted to fight, he could not get the better, he was conquered, prostrated, subjugated, led captive. He learnt to rely upon God, and it remaineth that him whom the Law alarmed while he relied upon himself, grace should assist now that he trusteth in God. In this confidence he saith, “Who shall deliver me from the body of this death? The grace of God by Jesus Christ our Lord.” Now see the sweetness, taste it, relish it; hear the Psalm, “Taste and see that the Lord is sweet.” He hath become sweet to thee, for that He hath delivered thee. Thou wast bitter to thine own self, when thou didst rely upon thyself. Drink sweetness, receive the earnest of so great abundance.
Hominis praesumptio per Legem, captivitas per gratiam tollitur. Redite mecum ad captivum illum, redite mecum ad propositionem meam. Lex terret de se praesumentem, gratia adjuvat in Deum sperantem. Vide enim illum captivum. Videt aliam legem in membris suis repugnantem legi mentis suae et captivum se ducentem in lege peccati, quae est in membris ejus. Ecce vincitur, ecce trahitur, ecce captivatur, ecce subjugatur. Quid ei profuit, Non concupisces? Audivit, Non concupisces, ut nosset hostem, non ut vinceret. Concupiscentiam enim, id est hostem suum, nesciebat, nisi Lex diceret, Non concupisces. Jam vidisti hostem; pugna, libera te, assere te in libertatem; prematur jucunda suggestio, perimatur illicita delectatio. Armare, habes legem; procede, vince, si potes. Quid enim est quod ex aliquantula jam gratia Dei condelectaris legi Dei secundum interiorem hominem? Sed vides aliam legem in membris tuis repugnantem legi mentis tuae: non repugnantem et nihil valentem, sed captivum te ducentem in lege peccati. Ecce unde timenti tibi absconditur multitudo illa dulcedinis: absconditur timenti, quomodo perficitur speranti? Clama sub hoste, quia habes oppugnatorem, habes et adjutorem qui te exspectat pugnantem, sublevat laborantem; sed si inveniat sperantem: odit enim superbientem. Sub hoste ergo quid clamas? Miser ego homo. Jam videtis, quoniam clamastis. Sit iste clamor vester, quando forte sub hoste laboratis, dicite, in intimis praecordiis dicite, sana fide dicite, Miser ego homo. Miser ego, ideo miser quia ego. Miser ego homo, et quia ego, et quia homo. Vane enim conturbatur. Quamvis enim in imagine perambulet homo : Miser ego homo, quis me liberabit de corpore mortis hujus? Numquid tu? Ubi sunt vires tuae, ubi est praesumptio tua? Certe aliqua taces: taces, sed taces a te extollendo, non a Deo invocando. Tace et clama. Quia et ipse Deus tacet et clamat; tacet a judicio, non tacet a praecepto: sic et tu tace ab elatione, noli ab invocatione; ne dicat tibi Deus, Tacui, numquid semper tacebo ? Exclama ergo, Miser ego homo. Agnosce te victum, vires tuas confunde, et dic, Miser ego homo, quis me liberabit de corpore mortis hujus? Quid dixeram? Lex terret de se praesumentem. Ecce homo de se praesumebat, tentavit pugnare, non potuit superare; victus est, prostratus est, subjugatus est, captivatus est. Didicit de Deo praesumere, et quem lex terruit de se praesumentem, restat ut gratia adjuvet in Deum sperantem. Hoc confidens dicit, Quis me liberabit de corpore mortis hujus? Gratia Dei per Jesum Christum Dominum nostrum . Jam vide dulcedinem, gusta, sapiat tibi: audi Psalmum, Gustate et videte quoniam suavis est Dominus . Factus est tibi suavis, quia liberavit te. Amarus tibi fuisti, cum praesumeres in te. Bibe dulcedinem, accipe pignus tanti horrei.
95.6 PL 38, 794
6. The disciples then of the Lord Jesus Christ while yet under the Law had to be cleansed still, to be nourished still, to be corrected still, to be directed still. For they still had concupiscence; whereas the Law saith, “Thou shalt not lust.” Without offence to those holy rams, the leaders of the flock, without offence to them I would say it, for I say the truth: the Gospel relates, that they contended which of them should be the greatest, and whilst the Lord was yet on earth, they were agitated by a dissension about pre-eminence. Whence was this, but from the old leaven? whence, but from the law in the members, resisting the law of the mind? They sought for eminence; yea, they desired it; they thought which should be the greatest; therefore is their pride put to shame by a little child. Jesus calleth unto him the age of humility to tame the swelling desire. With good reason then when they returned too, and said, “Lord, behold even the devils are subject unto us through Thy Name.” (It was for a nothing that they rejoiced; of what importance was it compared to that which God promised?) The Lord, the Good Master, quieting fear, and building up a firm support, said to them, “In this rejoice not that the devils are subject unto you.” Why so? Because “many will come in My Name, saying, Behold, in Thy Name we have cast out devils; and I will say to them, I know you not. In this rejoice not, but rejoice because your names are written in heaven.” Ye cannot yet be there, yet notwithstanding ye are already written there. Therefore “rejoice.” So that place again, “Hitherto have ye asked nothing in My Name.” For what ye have asked, in comparison with that which I am willing to give, is nothing. For what have ye asked in My Name? That the devils should be subject unto you? “In this rejoice not,” that is, what ye have asked is nothing; for if it were anything, He would bid them rejoice. So then it was not absolutely nothing, but that it was little in comparison of that greatness of God’s rewards. For the Apostle Paul was not really not anything; and yet in comparison of God, “Neither is he that planteth anything, neither he that watereth.” And so I say to you, and I say to myself, both to myself and you I say, when we ask in Christ’s Name for these temporal things. For ye have asked undoubtedly. For who doth not ask? One asketh for health, if he is sick; another asketh for deliverance, if he is in prison; another asketh for the port, if he is tossed about at sea; another asketh for victory, if he is in conflict with an enemy; and in the Name of Christ he asketh all, and what he asketh is nothing. What then must be asked for? “Ask in My Name.” And He said not what, but by the very words we understand what we ought to ask. “Ask, and ye shall receive, that your joy may be full. Ask, and ye shall receive, in My Name.” But what? Not nothing; but what? “That your joy may be full;” that is, ask what may suffice you. For when thou askest for temporal things, thou askest for nothing. “Whoso shall drink of this water, shall thirst again.” He letteth down the watering pot of desire into the well, he taketh up whereof to drink, only that he may thirst again. “Ask, that your joy may be full;” that is, that ye may be satisfied, not feel delight only for a time. Ask what may suffice you; speak Philip’s language, “Lord, show us the Father, and it sufficeth us.” The Lord saith to you, “Have I been so long time with you, and have ye not known Me? Philip, he that seeth Me, seeth the Father also.” Render then thanks to Christ, made weak for you that are weak, and make ready your desires for Christ’s Divinity, to be satisfied therewith. Turn we to the Lord, etc.
Discipuli sub Lege nondum a cupiditatibus liberi. Temporalia a Deo petentes, nihil petunt. Discipuli ergo Domini Jesu Christi adhuc sub lege mundi, adhuc nutriendi, adhuc corrigendi, adhuc dirigendi. Adhuc enim concupiscebant: cum lex dicat, Non concupisces . Pace dixerim eorum sanctorum arietum, ducum gregis; pace eorum dixerim, quia verum dico: Evangelium loquitur: contendebant quis esset eorum major , et adhuc in terra Domino constituto, principatus dissensione fluctuabant. Hoc unde, nisi ex fermento vetere? hoc unde nisi ex lege in membris, repugnante legi mentis? Fastigium quaerebant: enimvero cupiebant; quis major esset cogitabant: ideo altitudo eorum de puero confunditur. Vocat ad se Jesus humilem aetatem, ut domet tumidam cupiditatem . Merito ergo et quando redierunt, et dixerunt, Domine, ecce daemonia subjecta sunt nobis in nomine tuo: (Gaudebant de nihilo: quantum erat, quid erat, ad illud quod Deus promittebat)? Dominus ergo, magister bonus, sedans timorem, aedificans firmitatem, ait illis: Nolite in hoc gaudere, quia daemonia vobis subjecta sunt. Quare hoc? Quia multi venient in nomine meo dicentes, Ecce in nomine tuo daemonia ejecimus; et dicam eis, Non novi vos . Nolite in hoc gaudere, sed gaudete quia nomina vestra scripta sunt in coelis. Adhuc ibi esse non potestis, et tamen jam ibi scripti estis, Gaudete ergo. Et illud, Adhuc nihil petiistis in nomine meo. Quod enim petiistis ad quod volo dare, nihil est. Quid enim petiistis in nomine meo? Ut daemonia vobis subjecta essent? In hoc gaudere nolite, hoc est, nihil est quod petiistis: si enim aliquid esset, gaudere juberet. Ergo non omnino nihil erat, sed quia ad illam magnitudinem praemiorum Dei exiguum erat. Non enim vere Paulus apostolus non erat aliquid; et tamen in comparatione Dei, Neque qui plantat est aliquid, neque qui rigat . Et vobis dicimus, et nobis dicimus, et nobis et vobis dicimus, quando petimus in nomine Christi temporalia ista. Certe enim petiistis. Nam quis non petat? Alius sanitatem petit, si aegrotat; alius liberationem petit, si in carcere constitutus est; alius portum rogat, si in navi turbatur; alius victoriam rogat, si cum hoste confligit; et in nomine Christi totum rogat, et nihil est quod rogat. Quid ergo rogandum est? Petite in nomine meo. Et non dixit quid, sed in verbis intelligimus quid petere debeamus. Petite, et accipietis, ut gaudium vestrum sit plenum. Petite, et accipietis, in nomine meo. Sed quid? Non nihil: quid autem? Ut gaudium vestrum sit plenum: id est, hoc petite quod vobis sufficiat. Nam quando petis nihil: qui bibet de hac aqua, sitiet iterum . Mittit in puteum hydriam cupiditatis, levat unde bibat, ut iterum sitiat. Petite ut gaudium vestrum sit plenum: id est, ut satiemini, non ut ad tempus delectemini. Petite quod vobis sufficiat: dicite vocem Philippi, Domine, ostende nobis Patrem, et sufficit nobis. Dicit vobis Dominus, Tanto tempore vobiscum sum, et non cognovistis me? Philippe, qui me videt, videt et Patrem (Joan, XIV, 8, 9). Ergo gratias agite Christo pro vobis infirmantibus, et fauces satiandas parate Christi divinitati. Conversi ad Dominum, etc.