Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 122
122.1 Chapter XX. 30–31, and XXI. 1-11 PL 35, 1959
1. After telling us of the incident in connection with which the disciple Thomas had offered to his touch the places of the wounds in Christ’s body, and saw what he would not believe, and believed, the evangelist John interposes these words, and says: “And many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of His disciples, which are not written in this book: but these are written that ye may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye may have life through His name.” This paragraph indicates, as it were, the end of the book; but there is afterwards related how the Lord manifested Himself at the sea of Tiberias, and in the draught of fishes made special reference to the mystery of the Church, as regards its future character, in the final resurrection of the dead. I think, therefore, it is fitted to give special prominence thereto, that there has been thus interposed, as it were, an end of the book, and that there should be also a kind of preface to the narrative that was to follow, in order in some measure to give it a position of greater eminence. The narrative itself begins in this way: “After these things Jesus showed Himself again to the disciples at the sea of Tiberias; and on this wise showed He (Himself). There were together Simon Peter, and Thomas called Didymus, and Nathanael of Cana in Galilee, and the sons of Zebedee, and two other of His disciples. Simon Peter saith unto them, I go a fishing. They say unto him, We also go with thee.”
Post narrationem rei gestae, in qua Thomas discipulus oblatis sibi tangendis in Christi carne vulnerum locis, vidit quod credere nolebat et credidit; interponit haec evangelista Joannes, et dicit: « Multa quidem et alia signa fecit Jesus in conspectu discipulorum suorum, quae non sunt scripta in libro hoc. Haec autem scripta sunt, ut credatis quia Jesus est Christus Filius Dei; et ut credentes, vitam habeatis in nomine ejus. » Hoc capitulum velut libri hujus indicat finem: sed narratur hic deinde quemadmodum se manifestaverit Dominus ad mare Tiberiadis, et in captura piscium commendaverit Ecclesiae sacramentum, qualis futura est ultima resurrectione mortuorum. Ad hoc itaque commendandum valere arbitror, quod tanquam finis interpositus est libri, quod esset etiam secuturae narrationis quasi prooemium, quod ei quodammodo faceret eminentiorem locum, quae narratio incipit ita: « Postea manifestavit se iterum Jesus ad mare Tiberiadis; manifestavit autem sic Erant simul Simon Petrus et Thomas qui dicitur Didymus, et Nathanael qui erat a Cana Galilaeae, et filii Zebedaei, et alii ex discipulis ejus duo. Dicit eis Simon Petrus: Vado piscari. Dicunt ei: Venimus et nos tecum. »
122.2 PL 35, 1959
2. The inquiry is usually made in connection with this fishing of the disciples, why Peter and the sons of Zebedee returned to what they were before being called by the Lord; for they were fishers when He said to them, “Come after me, and I will make you fishers of men.” And they put such reality into their following of Him then, that they left all in order to cleave to Him as their Master: so much so, that when the rich man went away from Him in sorrow, because of His saying to him, “Go sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven, and come follow me,” Peter said unto Him, “Lo, we have forsaken all, and followed Thee.” Why is it then that now, by the abandonment as it were of their apostleship, they become what they were, and seek again what they had forsaken, as if forgetful of the words they had once listened to, “No man, putting his hand to the plough, and looking back, is fit for the kingdom of heaven”? Had they done so when Jesus was lying in the grave, before He rose from the dead,—which of course they could not have done, as the day whereon He was crucified kept them all in closest attention till His burial, which took place before evening; while the next day was the Sabbath, when it was unlawful for those who observed the ancestral custom to work at all; and on the third day the Lord rose again, and re called them to the hope which they had not yet begun to entertain regarding Him;—yet had they then done so, we might suppose it had been done under the influence of that despair which had taken possession of their minds. But now, after His restoration to them alive from the tomb, after the most evident truth of His revivified flesh offered to their eyes and hands, not only to be seen, but also to be touched and handled; after inspecting the very marks of the wounds, even to the confession of the Apostle Thomas, who had previously declared that he would not otherwise believe; after the reception by His breathing on them of the Holy Spirit, and after the words poured from His lips into their ears, “As the Father hath sent me, even so send I you: whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them; and whose soever ye retain, they are retained:” they suddenly become again what they had been, fishers, not of men, but of fishes.
Quaeri solet de hac piscatione discipulorum, cur redierint Petrus et filii Zebedaei ad id quod fuerunt priusquam a Domino vocarentur: erant enim piscatores quando eis dixit, Venite post me, et faciam vos piscatores hominum . Tunc eum quippe illi secuti sunt, ut magisterio ejus relictis omnibus adhaererent: in tantum ut cum ab eo dives ille tristis abscederet, cui dixerat, Vade, vende quae habes, et da pauperibus, et habebis thesauram in coelo; et veni, sequere me, diceret ei Petrus, Ecce nos dimisimus omnia, et secuti sumus te . Quid est ergo quod nunc quasi Apostolatu relicto fiunt quod fuerunt, et quod dimiserant repetunt, tanquam obliti quod audierant, Nemo ponens manum super aratrum, et respiciens retro, aptus est regno coelorum ? Quod si fecissent defuncto Jesu, priusquam resurrexisset a mortuis: quod quidem non poterant, quoniam dies quo crucifixus est, totos eos tenebat attentos, usque ad ejus sepulturam, quae ante vesperam facta est; sequens autem dies erat sabbati, quando eis morem patrium servantibus, operari utique non licebat; tertio vero die Dominus resurrexit, eosque revocavit ad spem quam de illo non habere jam coeperant: tamen si tunc fecissent, putaremus eos illa quae animos eorum occupaverat, desperatione fecisse. Nunc vero post eum sibi de sepulcro redditum vivum, post oblatam suis oculis et manibus, non solum videndam, verum etiam tangendam atque palpandam redivivae carnis evidentissimam veritatem; post inspecta vulnerum loca, usque ad apostoli Thomae confessionem, qui se aliter crediturum non esse praedixerat; post acceptum ejus insufflatione Spiritum sanctum, post verba in suas aures ejus ore prolata, Sicut misit me Pater, et ego mitto vos: quorum remiseritis peccata, remittuntur eis, et quorum retinueritis, retenta sunt : subito fiunt sicut fuerant, non hominum, sed piscium piscatores.
122.3 PL 35, 1960
3. We have therefore to give those who are disturbed by this the answer, that they were not prohibited from seeking necessary sustenance by their manual craft, when lawful in itself, and warranted so long as they preserved their apostleship intact, if at any time they had no other means of gaining a livelihood. Unless any one have the boldness to imagine or to affirm, that the Apostle Paul attained not to the perfection of those who left all and followed Christ, seeing that, in order not to become a burden to any of those to whom he preached the gospel, he worked with his own hands for his support: wherein we find rather the fulfillment of his own words, “I labored more abundantly than they all;” and to which he added, “yet not I, but the grace of God that was with me:” to make it manifest that this also was to be imputed to the grace of God, that both with mind and body he was able to labor so much more abundantly than they all, that he neither ceased from preaching the gospel, nor drew, like them, his present support out of the gospel; while he was sowing it much more widely and fruitfully through multitudes of nations where the name of Christ had never previously been proclaimed. Whereby he showed that living, that is, deriving their subsistence, by the gospel, was not imposed on the apostles as a necessity, but conferred on them as a power. And of this power the same apostle makes mention when he says: “If we have sown to you spiritual things, is it a great thing if we reap your carnal things? If others are partakers of this power among you, are not we rather? But,” he adds, “we have not used this power.” And a little afterwards he says: “They who serve the altar are partakers with the altar: even so hath the Lord ordained, that they who preach the gospel should live of the gospel; but I have used none of these things.” It is clear enough, therefore, that it was not enjoined on the apostles, but put in their power, not to find their living otherwise than by the gospel, and of those to whom by preaching the gospel they sowed spiritual things, to reap their carnal things; that is, to take their bodily support, and, as the soldiers of Christ, to receive the wages due to them, as from the inhabitants of provinces subject to Christ. Hence that same illustrious soldier had said a little before, in reference to this matter, “Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges?” Which he nevertheless did himself; for he labored more abundantly than they all. If, then, the blessed Paul—that he might not use with them the power which he certainly possessed along with the other preachers of the gospel, but went a warfare at his own charges, that the Gentiles, who were utterly averse to the name of Christ, might not take offense at his teaching, as something offered them for a money equivalent,—in a way very different from that in which he had been educated, learned an altogether new art, that while the teacher supports himself with his own hands, none of his hearers might be burdened; how much rather did the blessed Peter, who had beforetimes been a fisherman, do what he was already acquainted with, if at that present time he found no other means of gaining a livelihood?
His ergo quos hoc movet respondendum est, non eos fuisse prohibitos arte sua, licita scilicet atque concessa, victum necessarium quaerere, sui Apostolatus integritate servata, si quando unde viverent aliud non haberent. Nisi forte quispiam putare audebit aut dicere, apostolum Paulum non pertinuisse ad eorum perfectionem qui relictis omnibus Christum secuti sunt, quoniam ne quemquam eorum gravaret quibus Evangelium praedicabat, suum victum suis manibus transigebat : ubi magis impletum est quod ait, Plus omnibus illis laboravi; et adjunxit, Non autem ego, sed gratia Dei mecum : ut hoc quoque appareat Dei gratiae deputandum, quod et animo et corpore poterat usque adeo plus illis omnibus laborare, ut neque cessaret ab Evangelio praedicando, neque tamen ex Evangelio, sicut illi, sustentaret hanc vitam; cum id per tot gentes in quibus Christi nomen non fuerat prophetatum, multo latius atque fertilius seminaret. Ubi ostendit ex Evangelio vivendi, hoc est victum habendi, non necessitatem Apostolis impositam, sed potestatem datam. Quam potestatem commemorat idem apostolus dicens: « Si nos vobis spiritualia seminavimus, magnum est si vestra carnalia metamus? Si alii potestatis vestrae participant, non magis nos? Sed non sumus, » inquit, « usi hac potestate. » Et paulo post: « Qui altari serviunt, » inquit, « altari compartiuntur; sic et Dominus ordinavit his qui Evangelium annuntiant, de Evangelio vivere: ego autem nullo horum usus sum. » Satis igitur apertum est, non imperatum, sed in potestate Apostolis positum, ut aliunde non viverent nisi ex Evangelio, et ab eis quibus Evangelium praedicando spiritualia seminabant, carnalia meterent; hoc est, carnis hujus sustentaculum sumerent, et tanquam milites Christi stipendium debitum acciperent, sicut a provincialibus Christi. Unde idem ipse miles egregius paulo superius de hac re dixerat, Quis militat suis stipendiis unquam ? Quod tamen ipse faciebat, quia plus illis omnibus laborabat. Si ergo beatus Paulus ut ea potestate, quam profecto cum caeteris Evangelii praedicatoribus habebat, non cum caeteris uteretur, sed suo stipendio militaret, ne gentes a nomine Christi penitus alienas doctrina ejus quasi venalis offenderet, aliter educatus, artem quam non noverat didicit, ut dum suis manibus transigitur doctor, nullus gravaretur auditor; quanto magis beatus Petrus, qui jam piscator fuerat, quod noverat fecit, si ad praesens illud tempus, aliud unde viveret, non invenit?
122.4 PL 35, 1961
4. But some one will reply, And why did he not find them, when the Lord had promised, saying, “Seek first the kingdom and righteousness of God, and all these things shall be added unto you”? Precisely also in this very way did the Lord fulfill His promise. For who else placed there the fishes that were to be caught, but He, who, we are bound to believe, threw them into the penury that compelled them to go a fishing, for no other reason than that He wished to show them the miracle He had prepared, that so He might both feed the preachers of His gospel, and at the same time enhance that gospel itself, by the great mystery which He was about to impress on their minds by the number of the fishes? And on this subject we also ought now to be telling you what He Himself has set before us.
Sed respondebit quispiam: Et cur non invenit, cum Dominus promiserit dicens, Quaerite primum regnum et justitiam Dei, et haec omnia apponentur vobis ? Prorsus etiam sic Dominus quod promisit implevit. Nam quis alius pisces qui caperentur apposuit? qui non ob aliud credendus est eis ingessisse penuriam qua compellerentur ire piscatum, nisi dispositum volens exhibere miraculum: ut simul et praedicatores Evangelii sui pasceret, et ipsum Evangelium tanto sacramento quod erat de numero piscium commendaturus augeret. De qua re etiam nos quod ipse apposuerit, dicere jam debemus.
122.5 PL 35, 1961
5. “Simon Peter,” therefore, “saith, I go a fishing.” Those who were with him “say unto him, We also go with thee. And they went forth, and entered into a ship; and that night they caught nothing. But when the morning was now come, Jesus stood on the shore; but the disciples knew not that it was Jesus. Then Jesus saith unto them, Children, have ye any meat? They answered Him, No. He saith unto them, Cast the net on the right side of the ship, and ye shall find. They cast therefore, and now they were not able to draw it for the multitude of fishes. Therefore that disciple whom Jesus loved saith unto Peter, It is the Lord. When Simon Peter heard that it was the Lord, he girt his coat unto him, for he was naked, and did cast himself into the sea. And the other disciples came in a little ship (for they were not far from the land, but as it were two hundred cubits), dragging the net with fishes. As soon then as they were come to land, they saw a fire of coals laid, and a fish laid thereon, and bread. Jesus saith unto them, Bring of the fish which ye have now caught. Simon Peter went up, and drew the net to land full of great fishes, an hundred and fifty and three: and for all there were so many, yet was not the net broken.”
Dicit ergo Simon Petrus: Vado piscari. Dicunt ei qui cum illo erant: Venimus et nos tecum. Et exierunt et ascenderunt in navem: et illa nocte nihil apprehenderunt. Mane autem jam facto stetit Jesus in littore; non tamen cognoverunt discipuli quia Jesus est. Dicit ergo eis Jesus: Pueri, numquid pulmentarium habetis? Responderunt ei: Non. Dicit eis: Mittite in dexteram navigii rete, et invenietis. Miserunt ergo, et jam non valebant illud trahere a multitudine piscium. Dicit ergo discipulus ille quem diligebat Jesus, Petro: Dominus est. Simon Petrus cum audisset quia Dominus est, tunica succinxit se, erat enim nudus, et misit se in mare. Alii autem discipuli navigio venerunt (non enim longe erant a terra, sed quasi cubitis ducentis), trahentes rete piscium. Ut ergo descenderunt in terram, viderunt prunas positas, et piscem superpositum, et panem. Dicit eis Jesus: Afferte de piscibus quos apprehendistis nunc. Ascendit Simon Petrus, et traxit rete in terram plenum magnis piscibus centum quinquaginta tribus. Et cum tanti essent, non est scissum rete.
122.6 PL 35, 1961
6. This is a great mystery in the great Gospel of John; and to commend it the more forcibly to our attention, the last chapter has been made its place of record. Accordingly, inasmuch as there were seven disciples taking part in that fishing, Peter, and Thomas, and Nathaneal, and the two sons of Zebedee, and two others whose names are withheld, they point, by their septenary number, to the end of time. For there is a revolution of all time in seven days. To this also pertains the statement, that when the morning was come, Jesus stood on the shore; for the shore likewise is the limit of the sea, and signifies therefore the end of the world. The same end of the world is shown also by the act of Peter, in drawing the net to land, that is, to the shore. Which the Lord has Himself elucidated, when in a certain other place He drew His similitude from a fishing net let down into the sea: “And they drew it,” He said, “to the shore.” And in explanation of what that shore was, He added, “So will it be in the end of the world.”
Hoc est magnum sacramentum in magno Joannis Evangelio; et ut vehementius commendaretur, loco ultimo scriptum. Quod ergo septem discipuli fuerunt in ista piscatione, Petrus, et Thomas, et Nathanael, et duo filii Zebedaei, et alii duo quorum nomina tacentur, isti suo septenario numero finem significant temporis. Universum quippe septem diebus volvitur tempus. Ad hoc pertinet quod mane facto Jesus stetit in littore; quia etiam littus finis est maris, et ideo finem significat saeculi. Eumdem finem saeculi ostendit et quod Petrus rete extraxit in terram, hoc est in littus. Quod ipse Dominus aperuit, ubi alio quodam loco de sagena in mare missa similitudinem dedit: Et eam trahunt, inquit, ad littus. Quod littus quid esset exponens, ait: Sic erit in consummatione saeculi .
122.7 PL 35, 1962
7. That, however, is a parable in word, not one embodied in outward action; and just as in the passage before us the Lord indicated by an outward action the kind of character the Church would have in the end of the world, so in the same way, by that other fishing, He indicated its present character. In doing the one at the commencement of His preaching and this latter after His resurrection, He showed thereby in the former case that the capture of fishes signified the good and bad presently existing in the Church; but in the latter, the good only, whom it will contain everlastingly, when the resurrection of the dead shall have been completed in the end of this world. Furthermore, on that previous occasion Jesus stood not, as here, on the shore, when He gave orders for the taking of the fish, but “entered into one of the ships, which was Simon’s, and prayed him that he would thrust out a little from the land; and He sat down therein, and taught the crowds. And when He had left speaking, He said unto Simon, Launch out into the deep, and let down your nets for a draught.” There also they put the fishes that were caught into the ship, and did not, as here, draw the net to the shore. By these signs, and any others that may be found, on the former occasion the Church was prefigured as it exists in this world, and on the other, as it shall be in the end of the world: the one accordingly took place before, and the other subsequently to the resurrection of the Lord; because there we were signified by Christ as called, and here as raised from the dead. On that occasion the nets are not let down on the right side, that the good alone might not be signified, nor on the left, lest the application should be limited to the bad; but without any reference to either side, He says, “Let down your nets for a draught,” that we may understand the good and bad as mingled together: while on this He says, “Cast the net on the right side of the ship,” to signify those who stood on the right hand, the good alone. There the net was broken on account of the schisms that were meant to be signified; but here, as then there will be no more schisms in that supreme peace of the saints, the evangelist was entitled to say, “And for all they were so great,” that is, so large, “yet was not the net broken;” as if with reference to the previous time when it was broken, and a commendation of the good that was here in comparison with the evil that preceded. There the multitude of fishes caught was so great, that the two vessels were filled and began to sink, that is, were weighed down to the point of sinking; for they did not actually sink, but were in extreme jeopardy. For whence exist in the Church the great evils under which we groan, save from the impossibility of withstanding the enormous multitude that, almost to the entire subversion of discipline, gain an entrance, with their morals so utterly at variance with the pathway of the saints? Here, however, they cast the net on the right side, “and now they were not able to draw it for the multitude of fishes.” What is meant by the words, “Now they were not able to draw it,” but this, that those who belong to the resurrection of life, that is to say, to the right hand, and depart this life within the nets of the Christian name, will be made manifest only on the shore, in other words, when they shall rise from the dead at the end of the world? Accordingly, they were not able to draw the nets so as to discharge into the vessel the fishes they had caught, as was done with all of those wherewith the net was broken, and the boats laden to sinking. But the Church possesses those right-hand ones after the close of this life in the sleep of peace, lying hid as it were in the deep, till the net reach the shore whither it is being drawn, as it were two hundred cubits. And as on that first occasion it was done by two vessels, with reference to the circumcision and the uncircumcision; so in this place, by the two hundred cubits, I am of opinion that there is symbolized, with reference to the elect of both classes, the circumcision and the uncircumcision, as it were two separate hundreds; because the number that passes to the right hand is represented summarily by hundreds. And last of all, in that former fishing the number of fishes is not expressed, as if the words were there acted on that were uttered by the prophet, “I have declared and spoken; they are multiplied beyond number:” while here there are none beyond calculation, but the definite number of a hundred and fifty and three; and of the reason of this number we must now, with the Lord’s help, give some account.
Sed illa verbi est, non rei gestae parabola: re autem gesta, sicut hoc loco qualiter in saeculi fine futura sit, ita Dominus alia piscatione significavit Ecclesiam qualiter nunc sit. Quod autem illud fecit in initio praedicationis suae, hoc vero post resurrectionem suam, hinc ostendit illam capturam piscium, bonos et malos significare, quos nunc habet Ecclesia; istam vero tantummodo bonos, quos habebit in aeternum, completa in fine hujus saeculi resurrectione mortuorum. Denique ibi Jesus non sicut hic in littore stabat, quando jussit pisces capi; sed ascendens in unam navim quae erat Simonis, rogavit eum ut a terra reduceret pusillum; et in ea sedens docebat turbas. Ut cessavit autem loqui, dixit ad Simonem: Duc in altum, et laxate retia vestra in capturam. Et illic quod captum est piscium in naviculis fuit, non sicut hic rete extraxerunt in terram. His signis et si qua alia potuerint reperiri, ibi Ecclesia in hoc saeculo, hic vero in fine saeculi figurata est: ideo illud ante, hoc autem post resurrectionem Domini factum est; quia ibi nos Christus significavit vocatos, hic resuscitatos. Ibi retia non mittuntur in dexteram, ne solos significent bonos, nec in sinistram, ne solos malos; sed indifferenter, Laxate, inquit, retia vestra in capturam, ut permixtos intelligamus bonos et malos: hic autem, inquit, Mittite in dexteram navigii rete, ut significaret eos qui stabant ad dexteram, solos bonos. Ibi rete propter significanda schismata rumpebatur: hic vero quoniam tunc jam in illa summa pace sanctorum nulla erunt schismata, pertinuit ad Evangelistam dicere, Et cum tanti essent, id est, tam magni, non est scissum rete; tanquam illud respiceret ubi scissum est, et in illius mali comparatione commendaret hoc bonum. Ibi capta est multitudo piscium tanta, ut impleta duo navigia mergerentur , id est, in submersionem premerentur: non enim mersa sunt, sed tamen periclitata. Unde enim existunt in Ecclesia, tanta quae gemimus; nisi cum tantae multitudini obsisti non potest, quae ad submergendam propemodum disciplinam intrat cum moribus suis a sanctorum itinere penitus alienis? Hic autem miserunt rete in dexteram partem, et jam non valebant illud trahere a multitudine piscium. Quid est, jam non valebant illud trahere, nisi quia illi qui pertinent ad resurrectionem vitae, id est ad dexteram, et intra christiani nominis retia defunguntur, nonnisi in littore, id est in fine saeculi cum resurrexerint, apparebunt? Ideo non valuerunt sic trahere retia, ut in navem refunderent quos ceperant pisces; sicut de illis omnibus factum est, quibus rete disruptum, et naviculae pressae sunt. Habet autem istos dextros Ecclesia post finem vitae hujus in somne pacis, velut in profundo latentes, donec ad littus rete perveniat quo trahebatur, quasi a cubitis ducentis. Quod autem illic duabus naviculis, propter circumcisionem et praeputium; hoc isto loco ducentis cubitis existimo figuratum, propter utriusque generis electos, et circumcisionis et praeputii, tanquam centum et centum; quia in summa centenarii numerus ad dexteram transit. Postremo in illa piscatione numerus piscium non exprimitur, tanquam illud ibi fiat quod praedictum est per prophetam, Annuntiavi et locutus sum; multiplicati sunt super numerum : hic vero non sunt aliqui super numerum, sed certus est numerus centum quinquaginta tres; cujus numeri ratio Domino adjuvante reddenda est.
122.8 PL 35, 1963
8. For if we determine on the number that should indicate the law, what else can it be but ten? For we have absolute certainty that the Decalogue of the law, that is, those ten well-known precepts, were first written by the finger of God on two tables of stone. But the law, when it is not aided by grace, maketh transgressors, and is only in the letter, on account of which the apostle specially declared, “The letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.” Let the spirit then be added to the letter, lest the letter kill him whom the spirit maketh not alive, and let us work out the precepts of the law, not in our own strength, but by the grace of the Saviour. But when grace is added to the law, that is, the spirit to the letter, there is, in a kind of way, added to ten the number of seven. For this number, namely seven, is testified by the documents of holy writ given us for perusal, to signify the Holy Spirit. For example, sanctity or sanctification properly pertains to the Holy Spirit, whence, as the Father is a spirit, and the Son a spirit, because God is a spirit, so the Father is holy and the Son holy, yet the Spirit of both is called peculiarly by the name of the Holy Spirit. Where, then, was there the first distinct mention of sanctification in the law but on the seventh day? For God sanctified not the first day, when He made the light; nor the second, when He made the firmament; nor the third, when He separated the sea from the land, and the land brought forth grass and timber; nor the fourth, wherein the stars were created; nor the fifth, wherein were created the animals that live in the waters or fly in the air; nor the sixth, when the terrestrial living soul and man himself were created; but He sanctified the seventh day, wherein He rested from all His works. The Holy Spirit, therefore, is aptly represented by the septenary number. The prophet Isaiah likewise says, “The Spirit of God shall rest on Him;” and thereafter calls our attention to that Spirit in His septenary work or grace, by saying, “The spirit of wisdom and understanding, the spirit of counsel and might, the spirit of knowledge and piety; and He shall be filled with the spirit of the fear of God.” And what of the Revelation? Are they not there called the seven Spirits of God, while there is only one and the same Spirit dividing to every one severally as He will? But the septenary operation of the one Spirit was so called by the Spirit Himself, whose own presence in the writer led to their being spoken of as the seven Spirits. Accordingly, when to the number of ten, representing the law, we add the Holy Spirit as represented by seven, we have seventeen; and when this number is used for the adding together of every several number it contains, from 1 up to itself, the sum amounts to one hundred and fifty-three. For if you add 2 to 1, you have 3 of course; if to these you add 3 and 4, the whole makes 10; and then if you add all the numbers that follow up to 17, the whole amounts to the foresaid number; that is, if to 10, which you had reached by adding all together from 1 to 4, you add 5, you have 15; to these add 6, and the result is 21; then add 7, and you have 28; to this add 8, and 9, and 10, and you get 55; to this add 11 and 12, and 13, and you have 91; and to this again add 14, 15, and 16, and it comes to 136; and then add to this the remaining number of which we have been speaking, namely, 17, and it will make up the number of fishes. But it is not on that account merely a hundred and fifty-three saints that are meant as hereafter to rise from the dead unto life eternal, but thousands of saints who have shared in the grace of the Spirit, by which grace harmony is established with the law of God, as with an adversary; so that through the life-giving Spirit the letter no longer kills, but what is commanded by the letter is fulfilled by the help of the Spirit, and if there is any deficiency it is pardoned. All therefore who are sharers in such grace are symbolized by this number, that is, are symbolically represented. This number has, besides, three times over, the number of fifty, and three in addition, with reference to the mystery of the Trinity; while, again, the number of fifty is made up by multiplying 7 by 7, with the addition of 1, for 7 times 7 make 49. And the 1 is added to show that there is one who is expressed by seven on account of His sevenfold operation; and we know that it was on the fiftieth day after our Lord’s ascension that the Holy Spirit was sent, for whom the disciples were commanded to wait according to the promise.
Si enim numerum constituamus qui Legem significet, quid erunt nisi decem? Decalogum quippe Legis, id est, decem notissima illa praecepta digito Dei duabus lapideis tabulis primum fuisse conscripta certissimum nobis est . Sed Lex quando non adjuvat gratia, praevaricatores facit, et tantummodo in littera est: propter hoc enim maxime ait Apostolus, Littera occidit, spiritus autem vivificat . Accedat ergo ad litteram spiritus, ne occidat littera quem non vivificat spiritus; sed ut operemur praecepta Legis, non viribus nostris, sed munere Salvatoris. Cum autem accedit ad Legem gratia, id est, ad litteram spiritus, quodammodo denario numero additur septenarius. Isto quippe numero, id est septenario, significari Spiritum sanctum, advertenda Litterarum sacrarum documenta testantur. Nempe enim sanctitas vel sanctificatio ad sanctum proprie pertinet Spiritum: unde cum et Pater spiritus sit, et Filius spiritus sit, quoniam Deus spiritus est ; et Pater sanctus, et Filius sanctus sit: proprio tamen nomine amborum Spiritus vocatur Spiritus sanctus. Ubi ergo primum in Lege sonuit sanctificatio, nisi in die septimo? Non enim sanctificavit Deus diem primum, in quo fecit lucem; aut secundum, in quo firmamentum; aut tertium, in quo discrevit mare a terra, et terra herbam lignumque produxit; aut quartum, in quo sidera sunt creata; aut quintum, in quo animalia quae in aquis vivunt et in aere volitant; aut sextum, in quo terrestris anima viva et ipse homo: sed sanctificavit diem septimum, in quo requievit ab operibus suis . Convenienter igitur septenario numero significatur Spiritus sanctus. Isaias etiam propheta, Requiescet, inquit, in eo Spiritus Dei: eumque deinceps commendans opere vel munere septenario, Spiritus, inquit, sapientiae et intellectus, spiritus consilii et fortitudinis, spiritus scientiae et pietatis, et implebit illum spiritus timoris Dei . Quid in Apocalypsi? nonne septem spiritus Dei dicuntur , cum sit unus atque idem Spiritus, dividens propria unicuique prout vult ? Sed operatio septenaria unius Spiritus sic appellata est ab eodem Spiritu, qui scribenti adfuit, ut septem spiritus dicerentur. Cum itaque Legis denario Spiritus sanctus per septenarium numerum accedit, fiunt decem et septem: qui numerus ab uno usque ad seipsum computatis omnibus crescens, ad centum quinquaginta tres pervenit. Ad unum enim si adjicias duo, fiunt utique tres; his si adjicias tres et quatuor, fiunt omnes decem; deinde si adjicias omnes numeros qui sequuntur usque ad decem et septem, ad supradictum numerum summa perducitur; id est, si ad decem, quo ab uno usque ad quatuor perveneras, addas quinque, fiunt quindecim: his addas sex, et fiunt viginti unum; his addas septem, et fiunt viginti octo; his addas octo et novem et decem, et fiunt quinquaginta quinque; his addas undecim et duodecim et tredecim, et fiunt nonaginta unum; his rursum quatuordecim et quindecim et sexdecim, et fiunt centum triginta sex: huic numero adde illum qui restat de quo agitur, id est decem et septem, et piscium numerus ille complebitur. Non ergo tantummodo centum quinquaginta tres sancti ad vitam resurrecturi significantur aeternam, sed millia sanctorum ad gratiam Spiritus pertinentium: qua gratia cum Lege Dei tanquam cum adversario concordatur; ut vivificante Spiritu littera non occidat, sed quod per litteram jubetur, Spiritu adjuvante compleatur, et si quid minus fit, remittatur. Omnes ergo ad istam gratiam pertinentes, hoc numero figurantur, hoc est figurate significantur. Qui numerus ter habet etiam quinquagenarium numerum, et insuper ipsa tria propter mysterium Trinitatis: quinquagenarius autem multiplicatis septem per septem, et unius adjectione completur; nam septies septem fiunt quadraginta novem. Unus autem additur, ut eo significetur unum esse qui per septem propter operationem septenariam demonstratur: et novimus Spiritum sanctum post ascensionem Domini quinquagesimo die missum, quem discipuli jussi sunt exspectare promissum .
122.9 PL 35, 1964
9. It was not, then, without a purpose that these fishes were described as so many in number, and so large in size, that is, as both an hundred and fifty-three, and large. For so it is written, “And He drew the net to land full of great fishes, an hundred and fifty and three.” For when the Lord said, “I am not come to destroy the law, but to fulfill,” because about to give the Spirit, through whom the law might be fulfilled, and to add thereby, as it were, seven to ten; after interposing a few other words He proceeded, “Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. The latter, therefore, may possibly belong to the number of great fishes. But he that is the least, who undoes in deed what he teaches in word, may be in such a church as is signified by that first capture of fishes, which contains both good and bad, for it also is called the kingdom of heaven, as He says, “The kingdom of heaven is like unto a net that was cast into the sea, and gathered of ever kind;” where He wishes the good as well as the bad to be understood, and of whom He declares that they are yet to be separated on the shore, to wit, at the end of the world. And lastly, to show that those least ones are reprobates who teach by word of mouth the good which they undo by their evil lives, and that they will not be even the least, as it were, in the life that is eternal, but will have no place there at all; after saying, “He shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven,” He immediately added, “For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed [the righteousness] of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.” Such, doubtless—these scribes and Pharisees—are those who sit in Moses’ seat, and of whom He says, “Do ye what they say, but do not what they do; for they say, and do not.” They teach in sermons what they undo by their morals. It therefore follows that he who is least in the kingdom of heaven, as the Church now exists, shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven, as the Church shall be hereafter; for by teaching what he himself is in the habit of breaking, he can have no place in the company of those who do what they teach, and therefore will not be in the number of great fishes, seeing it is he “who shall do and teach that shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.” And because he will be great here, therefore shall he be there, where he that is least shall not be. Yea, so great will they certainly be there, that he who is less there is greater than the greatest here. And yet those who are great here, that is, who do the good that they teach in that kingdom of heaven into which the net gathereth good and bad, shall be greater still in that eternal state of the heavenly kingdom,—those, I mean, who are indicated by the fishes here as belonging to the right hand and to the resurrection of life. We have still to discourse, as God shall grant us ability, on the meal that the Lord took with those seven disciples, and on the words He spake after the meal, as well as on the close of the Gospel itself; but these are topics that cannot be included in the present lecture.
Non igitur frustra dicti sunt hi pisces et tot et tanti, id est et centum quinquaginta tres et magni. Sic enim scriptum est: Et traxit rete in terram plenum magnis piscibus centum quinquaginta tribus. Cum enim dixisset Dominus, Non veni solvere Legem, sed implere, daturus utique Spiritum per quem Lex posset impleri, tanquam septem additurus ad decem; paucissimis verbis interpositis ait, Qui ergo solverit unum de mandatis istis minimis, et docuerit sic homines, minimus vocabitur in regno coelorum: qui autem fecerit et docuerit, magnus vocabitur in regno coelorum. Iste ergo poterit pertinere ad numerum piscium magnorum. Minimus autem ille qui solvit factis quod docet verbis, in tali Ecclesia potest esse, qualem significat piscium prima illa captura, habentem bonos et malos, quia et ipsa dicitur regnum coelorum: propter quod ait, Simile est regnum coelorum sagenae missae in mare, et ex omni genere congreganti . Ubi vult intelligi etiam bonos, et malos; quos dicit in littore, id est, in fine saeculi separandos. Denique ut ostenderet istos minimos reprobos esse, qui docent bona loquendo, quae solvunt male vivendo, nec quasi minimos in vita aeterna futuros, sed omnino ibi non futuros; cum dixisset, Minimus vocabitur in regno coelorum, continuo subjecit, Dico enim vobis, quia nisi abundaverit justitia vestra plus quam Scribarum et Pharisaeorum, non intrabitis in regnum coelorum . Illi sunt certe, Scribae et Pharisaei, qui cathedram Moysi sedent, et de quibus ait, Quae dicunt facite; quae autem faciunt, facere nolite: dicunt enim et non faciunt : docent sermonibus, quod solvunt moribus. Consequens est ergo, ut qui minimus est in regno coelorum, qualis nunc est Ecclesia, non intret in regnum coelorum, qualis tunc erit Ecclesia; quoniam docendo quod solvit, ad eorum societatem qui faciunt quod docent, non pertinebit: et ideo non erit in numero piscium magnorum; quoniam qui fecerit et docuerit, magnus vocabitur in regno coelorum. Et quia hic magnus erit, ideo ibi erit, ubi minimus ille non erit. Usque adeo quippe ibi magni erunt, ut qui minor ibi est, major sit eo quo hic nemo major est . Sed tamen qui hic magni sunt, id est, qui in regno coelorum, ubi sagena congregat bonos et malos, faciunt bona quae docent, ipsi erunt in illa regni coelorum aeternitate majores, quos isti ad dexteram et resurrectionem vitae pertinentes indicant pisces. Sequitur de prandio Domini cum istis septem discipulis, et de his quae post prandium locutus est, ac de ipsius Evangelii termino, ut Deus quod donaverit disseramus: sed hoc non est isto sermone coarctandum.