Letters98 Letter XCVIII. Concerning the Maccabees, but to whom written is unknown.

san Bernardo di Chiaravalle († 1153) · Epistolae · c. 1120-1153

Letter XCVIII. Concerning the Maccabees, but to whom written is unknown.

He replies to the question why the Church has decreed a festival to the Maccabees alone of all the righteous under the ancient law.

1. Fulk, Abbot of Epernay, had already written to ask account it appears unsuitable to commemorate with joy the passing away of those which was not a passage of glory and of joy, why was there an exception made for the Maccabees? Or if they obtained favour on account of the courage which they displayed, why was not the same favour extended to those others? Or ought it to be said, in order to explain this difference, that if the martyrs of the ancient law, as well as those of the new law, have suffered for the same cause of religion, yet they did not suffer in the same condition with those who have attained to the glory of martyrdom? It is agreed that all the martyrs, whether of the Old or the New Testament, equally suffered for the sake of religion; but there is a distinction, because the one class suffered because they held it, the other because they censured those who held it not; the one because they would not desert it, the other because they declared that those would perish who deserted it, and to sum up in a word, that in which the two differ, perseverance in the faith has done in our martyrs that which zeal for the faith has done in those of the ancient law. The Maccabees are alone among the ancient martyrs, because they possessed not only the same cause as the new martyrdom, but also, as I have said, the form of it; and rightly, therefore, they have attained the same glory and fame as the new martyrs of the Church. For like our martyrs, they were urged to pour libations to false gods, to renounce the law of their fathers, and even to transgress the commandments of God, and like them they resisted and died.

2. Not so did Isaiah or Zecharias, or even that great prophet, John the Baptist, die; of whom the first is said to have been sawn asunder, the second slain between the temple and the altar (S. Matt, xxiii. 25), and the third beheaded in prison. If you ask by whom? It was by the wicked and irreligious. For what cause? For justice and religion. In what manner? For confessing and openly upholding these. They openly upheld the truth before those who hated it, and thus drew upon themselves the hatred which caused their death. That which the unrighteous and wicked persecuted was not so much religion in itself as those who brought it before them, nor was their object to attack the righteousness of others, but to remain undisturbed in their own unrighteousness. It is one thing to seize upon the good things of another, and another to defend one's own goods; to persecute the truth, and not to be willing to follow it one's self; to grudge at believers, and to be angry at their reproofs; to stop the mouth of those who confess their faith, and not to be able to bear patiently the taunts of those who contradict. Thus Herod sent and seized John. Wherefore! Because he preached Christ, or because he was a good and just man? On the contrary, he reverenced him the more on this account, and having heard him, did many things. But it was because John reproached Herod because of Herodias, his brother Philip's wife; on that account he was bound and beheaded; no doubt he suffered for the truth, but because he urged its interests with zeal, not because he was urged to deny it. This is why the suffering of so great a martyr is observed with less solemnity than those even of far less famous men.

3. It is certain that if the Maccabees had suffered in such a matter, and for such a reason as S. John, there would not have been any mention of them at all. But a confession of the truth, not unlike that of the Christian martyrs, made them like those; and rightly, therefore, a similar veneration follows. Let it not be objected that they did not, like our martyrs, suffer for Christ expressly by name; because it does not affect his status as a martyr whether a person suffers under the Law, on behalf of the observances of the Lawr, or under grace for the commandments of the Gospel. For it is recognized that each of these equally suffers for the truth, and, therefore, for Christ, who said: I am the Truth (S. John xiv. 6). Therefore the Maccabees are more deserving of the honours that have been conferred upon them for the kind of their martyrdom than for the valour displayed in it, since we do not see that the Church has decreed such honour to the righteous of a former time, although they have displayed equal courage on behalf of righteousness, for the time in which they lived. I suppose that it was thought unfit to appoint a day of festival for a death, however laudable, before the Death of Christ, especially since before that saving Passion those who died, instead of entering into joy and glory endured the darkness of the prison-house. The Church then, as I said above, considered that an exception should be made in favour of the Maccabees, since the nature of their martyrdom conferred upon them what the time of their suffering denied to others.

4. Nor them only, but those also who preceded in their death, the Death of Him who was the Life manifest in the flesh, either dying during His life, as Simeon and John the Baptist, or for Him, as the Innocents, we venerate with solemn rites, although they, too, descended into Hades; but for another reason. Thus, in the case of the Innocents, it would be unjust to deprive innocence dying on behalf of righteousness of fame even in the present. John also, knowing that from his day the kingdom of heaven suffered violence, therefore proclaimed, Do penitence, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand (S. Matt. iii. 2, VULG.); and, seeing that the Life would immediately follow him, endured death with joy. He, before his death, was careful to inquire from the Lord Himself respecting this, and had the happiness to be informed of it. For when he sent his disciples to ask of Jesus Art Thou He that should come, or are we to look for another? he received for answer, after the enumeration of very many miracles, And blessed is he who shall not be offended in me (S. Matt. xi. 3-6). In which answer the Lord intimated that He was about to die, and by such a death as might be to the Jews a stumbling block and to the Greeks foolishness. At this word the friend of the Bridegroom went onward rejoicing and with a willing mind, because he could not doubt that the Bridegroom also would speedily come. Therefore he who so joyfully could die merited also to be held in joyful remembrance. And that old man, too, as full of virtues as of days, who when death was already so near said, holding in his arms Him who was the Life, Now let test Thou Thy servant depart in peace, for mine eyes have seen Thy salvation (S. Luke ii. 29, 30), as if he had said, go down without fear into Hades, because I feel that my redemption is so nigh; he, too, who died with such fearless joy and such joyful security rightly deserves to be commemorated with joy in the Church.

5. But on what principle shall a death be accounted joyful which is not accompanied by the joys of heaven? or from whence should a dying person derive joy who was sure that he was going down into the darkness of the prison-house, and yet did not bear with him any certitude, how soon the consolation of a deliverer thence should come to him? Thus it was that when one of the saints heard Set thy house in order, for thou shalt die, and not live, he turned himself to the wall and wept bitterly, and so asked and obtained some deferring of hateful death. Thus also he lamented miserably, saying, I shall go to the gates of the grave; I am deprived of the half of my days (Is. xxxviii. 10); and a little after added, shall not see the Lord in the land of the living: I shall behold man no more with the inhabitants of the world (Is. xxxviii. n). Hence also another says: Who shall grant me that Thou wouldest protect me in the grave, that Thou wouldest keep me secret until Thy wrath be passed; that Thou wouldest appoint me a set time and remember me? (Job xiv. 13). Israel also said to his sons, Ye will bring down my grey hairs with sorrow to the grave (Gen. xlii. 38). What appearance is there in these deaths, of solemn joy, of rejoicing and festival?

6. But our martyrs desire to be unclothed and be with Christ, knowing well that where the Body is there without delay will the eagles be gathered together. There will the righteous rejoice in the sight of God, and be in joy and felicity. There, there, O most blessed Jesus, shall every saint who is delivered from this wicked world be filled speedily with the joy of Thy countenance. There in the habitations of the just resounds for ever one song of joy and salvation: Our soul is delivered as a bird out of the net of the fowler: the net is broken and we are delivered (Ps. cxxiv. 7). How could those sing this song of gladness who in Hades sat in darkness and the shadow of death, while as yet there was no Redeemer for them, no Saviour; while the Sun rising from on high, Christ the first fruits of them that slept, had not yet visited us? Rightly, then, does the Church, who has learnt to rejoice with them that rejoice and to weep with them that weep, distinguish, because of the time at which they lived, between those whom she judges equal in valour: and does not think the descent into Hades proper to be followed with equal honour as is the passage into life.

7. Therefore, though the motive makes martyrdom, yet the time and the nature of it determine the difference between martyrdoms. Thus the time in which they lived separates the Maccabees from the martyrs of the new law and joins them with those of the old; but the nature of their martyrdom associates them with the new and divides them from the old. From these causes come the differences of observance with which they are kept in memory in the Church. But that which is common to the whole company of the Saints before God is what the holy prophet declares: Precious in the sight of the Lord is the death of Pits saints (Ps. cxvi. 15). And why he calls it precious he explains to us: When He has given sleep to His beloved, behold, children, the heritage of the Lord; His reward, the fruit of the womb (Ps. cxxvii. 3). Nor must we think that martyrs alone are beloved, since wTe remember that it was said of Lazarus, Our friend Lazarus sleeps (S. John xi. u), and elsewhere, Blessed are the dead who die in the Lord (Apoc. xiv. 13). Not those alone who die for the Lord, like the martyrs, but without doubt those also who die in the Lord as confessors are blessed. There are two things, as it seems to me, which make death precious, the life which precedes it and the cause for which it is endured; but more the cause than the life. But when both the cause and the life concur that is the most precious of alL

1. Quod per fratrem Hescelinum tua Charitas a mea parvitate quaesivit, inde jam ad me scripserat Fulco Sparnacensis abbas. Cui ego nil rescripsi; volens, si quam forte super hoc reperissem Patrum sententiam, ipsam potius ei transmittere, quam novum vel nostrum quidpiam respondere: qua non facile occurrente, jam quod sentio ego, sic interim utrique respondeo, ut quodcunque forte rationabilius quilibet vestrum super eadem quaestiuncula quandoque vel legerit, vel audierit, vel certe ipse senserit, mihi vicissim impartiri non negligat. Quaeris itaque quidnam visum Patribus fuerit, ut solis ex omnibus antiquis justis singulari quodam privilegio Machabaeis annuam celebritatem pari cum nostris martyribus veneratione decernerent in Ecclesia solemniter exhibendam? Si dixero dignos merito martyrum gloria judicatos, quibus non impar fuit in martyrio virtus; erit forsitan solutum, cur ipsos, sed necdum plane cur solos: cum et alios nonnullos ex veteribus pari constet zelo pietatis occubuisse, non tamen pari et tripudio recoli meruisse. Quod si illis non immerito hujuscemodi legatur solemnis celebritas, quia nimirum quod praebuit virtus, praeripuit tempus: cur non et eadem fuit in Machabaeis consideratio? siquidem et ipsi pro tempore, non ad coeli mox gaudia, sed ad inferni tenebras descenderunt: ne tunc quippe apparente Primogenito ex mortuis, qui aperiret credentibus regna coelorum; agno videlicet de tribu Juda, qui aperit, et nemo claudit, ad cujus introitum cum omni auctoritate supernis potestatibus diceretur, Tollite portas, principes, vestras; et elevamini, portae aeternales, et introibit Rex gloriae. Proinde, si incongruum videtur cum gaudio recolere transitum qui gaudii non fuit, caveatur et in istis: aut, si istos ob suae virtutis meritum festivo prosequi favore placet, cur non itidem deferetur et illis?

2. An dicendum est, utrosque quidem in morte communem habuisse cum martyribus pietatis causam, sed non etiam utrosque pariter eamdem cum illis adeptos fuisse martyrii formam? Universis nempe tam Veteris, quam Novi Testamenti martyribus aeque convenit pro justitia occubuisse: sed interest quod isti passi sunt, quia illam tenebant; illi, quia non tenentes reprehendebant; isti, quod eam non desererent; illi, quod deserentes perituros esse assererent. Et ut breviter totum in quo differunt, proferamus: hos cultus, illos zelus justitiae martyres fecit. Soli ex veteribus Machabaei, quia non solum causam, sed et formam, ut dixi, novi martyrii tenuerunt; jure fortasse in Ecclesia cum novis Ecclesiae martyribus eamdem consuetae celebritatis gloriam assecuti sunt. Instar quippe martyrum nostrorum libare et ipsi diis alienis, patriamque deserere legem, imo mandata Dei transgredi cogebantur; renuebant, et moriebantur.

3. Non sic Isaias, non sic Zacharias, non denique vel magnus ille Joannes Baptista ita mortuus est: quorum primus serra fertur scissus fuisse; secundus inter templum et altare legitur occisus; tertius in carcere decollatus. Si quaeritur, a quibus? ab injustis et impiis. Si qua causa? pro justitia et pietate. Si quomodo? non tam eas confitendo, quam proponendo. Proponebant veritatem odientibus eam: veritas pariebat eis odium, et odium mortem. Licet injusti et impii, non tam tamen in illis pietatem persequebantur, quam a se repellebant: nec tam in illorum justitiam ferebantur, quam propriam tuebantur injustitiam. Aliud est aliena invadere, aliud defendere sua. Non est idipsum nolle sequi veritatem, et persequi; invidere credentibus, et increpantibus indignari: obturare os confitentium, et redarguentium stimulos non ferre patienter. Denique misit Herodes, et tenuit Joannem. Quam ob rem? quia Christum praedicabat? quia vir bonus erat et justus? imo propter hoc magis reverebatur illum, et audito eo multa faciebat. Sed quoniam arguebat Herodem Joannes propter Herodiadem uxorem Philippi fratris sui: ideo vinctus, ideo et decollatus est, passus quidem et ipse pro veritatis, sed quam zelare videretur, non negare cogeretur. Hinc est quod haec ipsa tanti martyris passio, multorum, etiam longe minorum, festivitatibus minus festive recolitur.

4. Profecto si tali ratione et ordine passi fuissent Machabaei, ne ulla quidem fieret de eis mentio. Nunc autem quoniam similes illos fecit martyribus christianis non dissimilis veritatis confessio, merito eos similis prosequitur et veneratio. Nec moveat sane, quod, quemadmodum martyres, nominatim et ipsi pro Christo minime passi sunt: quia non interest, sive sub Lege pro legalibus observantiis, sive sub Gratia pro mandatis evangelicis quis patiatur. Uterque enim aeque pro veritate, ac per hoc pro Christo, qui dixit, Ego sum veritas, pati cognoscitur. Itaque plus contulit Machabaeis in hac parte martyrii genus, quam virtus: quando ne hos quidem ex Patribus, quos pari constat virtute illo in tempore pro justitia decertasse, pari etiam honore concelebrat praesens duntaxat Ecclesia. Puto quod arbitretur indignum, quantumlibet laudabili morti, quae Christi mortem praecederet, diem festum impendere: praesertim cum ante illam salutiferam passionem, non festiva gaudia, sed claustra tenebrosa quosque morientes exciperent. Sane Machabaeos ideo, ut dictum est, excipiendos judicavit Ecclesia, quoniam quod eis negabat tempus, contulit martyrii genus.

5. Nec solum ipsos, sed et qui forte Vitae jam in carne manifestatae mortem sua morte praevenerunt, sive morientes in ipsa, sicut Simeon et Joannes Baptista; sive etiam pro ipsa, sicut Innocentes, quos alia ratione, licet ad inferos et ipsi descenderint, ritu nihilominus solemni veneramur. Et innocentes quidem, quoniam injustum profecto fuit innocentiam pro justitia morientem ulla vel praesenti gloria defraudari. Joannes quoque, sciens quod a diebus suis regnum coelorum vim patitur, unde et clamat, Agite poenitentiam, appropinquavit regnum coelorum; simulque videns Vitam se protinus secuturam, mortem laetus excepit. Quod utique ab ipso Domino moriturus sciscitari sollicitus fuit, ac certificari meruit. Nam cum per discipulos eum interrogasset, Tu es, inquiens, qui venturus es, an alium exspectamus? post enarrata plura miracula audivit: Et beatus qui non fuerit scandalizatus in me. In quo nimirum verbo significavit se Dominus moriturum, et tali morte, quae posset Judaeis esse scandalum, Gentibus stultitia. Ad hanc vocem sponsi gaudens amicus sponsi alacri animo praecessit, quo et illum in proximo esse venturum, jam dubitare non potuit. Porro qui laetus, et tam laetus potuit mori, potuit et laetam sibi memoriam promereri. Sed et senex ille tam plenus virtutum quam dierum, morte jam propinqua Vitam bajulans in manibus, aiebat, Nunc dimittis servum tuum, Domine, secundum verbum tuum in pace: quia viderunt oculi mei salutare tuum; ac si diceret: Securus descendo in carcerem, qui tam praesto meam sentio redemptionem. Et hic ergo, qui cum tam secura jucunditate et jucunda securitate moritur, merito in Ecclesia celebrari cum gaudio memoratur.

6. Caeterum illa qua ratione mors festiva reputabitur, quam nulla gaudiorum festivitas comitatur? aut unde gaudium sumeret moriturus, qui se et ad infernales descendere tenebras certus erat, nec certi quidpiam secum ferebat, unde in proximo de sui liberatore consolaretur? Inde est quod unus sanctorum, cum audiret, Dispone domui tuae, quia morieris tu, et non vives, convertit se ad parietem, et flevit fletu magno, atque ita impetravit exosae mortis aliquam dilationem. Hoc denique et miserabiliter plangebat, dicens: In dimidio dierum meorum vadam ad portas inferi et paulo post: Non videbo, inquit, Dominum Deum in terra viventium, non aspiciam hominem ultra, et habitatorem quietis. Hinc et alius quidam: Quis mihi hoc tribuat, ait, ut in inferno protegas me, et abscondas me, donec pertranseat furor tuus; et constituas mihi tempus in quo recorderis mei? Israel quoque ad filios aiebat: Deducetis canos meos cum dolore ad inferos. Quid in his solemnis laetitiae, quid festivae celebritatis apparet?

7. Nostri autem martyres cupiunt dissolvi, et esse cum Christo; certi, ubicunque est corpus, illo sine mora congregatum iri et aquilas. Mox, inquam, ibi exsultant justi in conspectu Dei, et delectantur in laetitia. Ibi, ibi, benignissime Jesu, ibi statim, ut de hoc saeculo nequam sanctus quisque eripitur, adimpletur laetitia cum vultu tuo. Una ibi vox jubilo resonat sempiterno, vox una exsultationis et salutis in tabernaculis justorum: Anima nostra sicut passer erepta est de laqueo venantium; laqueus contritus est, et nos liberati sumus. Nunquid hoc decantare libebat apud inferos sedentibus in tenebris et umbra mortis, dum non erat qui redimeret, neque qui salvum faceret, quando necdum visitaverat nos oriens ex alto, primitiae scilicet dormientium Christus? Merito igitur Ecclesia, quae gaudere cum gaudentibus, flere cum flentibus novit; quos pares judicat in virtute, discernit tamen ex tempore; nec pari putat prosequendum obsequio, et transitum ad vitam, et descensum ad inferos.

8. Itaque martyrium facit causa, tempus genusque discernunt. Tempus quippe Machabaeos a novis martyribus disjungit, conjungit antiquis. Genus vero novis aggregat, segregat a veteribus. Et hae quidem in Ecclesia praemissis ex causis differentiae observantur. Caeterum apud Deum universo coetui sanctorum commune est quod sanctus ait Propheta: Pretiosa in conspectu Domini mors sanctorum ejus. Unde autem pretiosam dixerit, exponat nobis: Cum dederit, inquit, dilectis suis somnum, ecce haereditas Domini filii, merces fructus ventris. Nec putemus solos martyres esse dilectos, cum recolamus dictum de Lazaro, Lazarus amicus noster dormit: denique, Beati mortui qui in Domino moriuntur. Non soli qui pro Domino, sicut martyres, sed et qui in Domino moriuntur, sicut confessores, profecto beati sunt. Duae proinde res mihi videntur mortem facere pretiosam, vita et causa; sed amplius causa, quam vita. Porro illa erit pretiosissima, quam et causa commendat et vita.

Samuel J. Eales (active by 1879; M.A., Principal of S. Boniface College, Warminster, in 1882), Life and Works of Saint Bernard, Abbot of Clairvaux, edited by Dom John Mabillon, vols. I-III, London: Burns & Oates / John Hodges, 1889-1896. Fonte del testo digitale: OCR of Internet Archive scans saintbernardlife00bernuoft, saintbernardlife02bernuoft, lifeworksofsaint03bern, word-repaired against second copies (lifeworksofsaint01bern, lifeworksofsaint02bern, LifeWorksOfSBernardClairvauxV3). Testo originale: Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich) TEI of the Patrologia Latina, via the CatholicCorpus mirror. Public domain in the US and Canada: published 1889-1896; translator active by 1879, an M.A. and principal in 1882; necessarily died before 1972. Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina 182-183 (1854), public domain.

Salva per dopo

Inserisci la tua email: ti invieremo un link per accedere. Nessuna password. Ciò che salvi (voci, versetti, capitoli, documenti) ti segue su ogni dispositivo.