Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 32

sant'Agostino d'Ippona (354–430 d.C.) · In Joannis evangelium tractatus CXXIV · PL 35, 1379–1976

32.1 Chapter VII. 37–39 PL 35, 1642

1. Among the dissensions and doubtings of the Jews concerning the Lord Jesus Christ, among other things which He said, by which some were confounded, others taught: “On the last day of that feast” (for it was then that these things were done) which is called the feast of tabernacles; that is, the building of tents, of which feast you remember, my beloved, that we have already discoursed, the Lord Jesus Christ calls, not by speaking in any way soever, but by crying aloud, that whoso thirsts may come to Him. If we thirst, let us come; and not by our feet, but by our affections; let us come, not by removing from our place, but by loving. Although, according to the inner man, he that loves does also move from a place. But it is one thing to move with the body, another thing to move with the heart: he migrates with the body who changes his place by a motion of the body; he migrates with the heart who changes his affection by a motion of the heart. If thou lovest one thing, and didst love another thing before, thou art not now where thou wast.

Inter dissensiones et dubitationes Judaeorum de Domino Jesu Christo, inter caetera quae dixit, quibus alii confunderentur, alii docerentur; novissimo illius festivitatis die (tunc enim ista agebantur), quae appellatur Scenopegia, id est tabernaculorum constructio, de qua festivitate jam antea meminit Charitas vestra fuisse dissertum, vocat Dominus Jesus Christus, et hoc non utcumque loquendo, sed clamando, ut qui sitit veniat ad eum. Si sitimus, veniamus; et non pedibus, sed affectibus; nec migrando, sed amando veniamus. Quanquam secundum interiorem hominem, et qui amat migrat. Et aliud est migrare corpore, aliud corde: migrat corpore qui motu corporis mutat locum; migrat corde, qui motu cordis mutat affectum. Si aliud amas, aliud amabas, non ibi es ubi eras.

32.2 PL 35, 1642

2. Accordingly, the Lord cries aloud to us: for, “He stood and cried out, if any man thirst, let him come unto me, and drink. He that believeth on me, as the Scripture saith, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.” We are not obliged to delay to inquire what this meant, since the evangelist has explained it. For why the Lord said, “If any man thirst, let him come unto me, and drink;” and, “He that believeth on me, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water;” the evangelist has subsequently explained, saying: “But this spake He of the Spirit which they that believe on Him should receive. For the Spirit was not yet given, because Jesus was not yet glorified.” There is therefore an inner thirst and an inner belly, because there is an inner man. And that inner man is indeed invisible, but the outer man is visible; but yet better is the inner than the outer. And this which is not seen is the more loved; for it is certain that the inner man is loved more than the outer. How is this certain? Let every man prove it in himself. For although they who live ill may surrender their minds to the body, yet they do wish to live, and to live is the property of the mind only; and they who rule, manifest themselves more than those things that are ruled. Now it is minds that rule, bodies are ruled. Every man rejoices in pleasure, and receives pleasure by the body: but separate the mind from it, and nothing remains in the body to rejoice; and if there is joy of the body, it is the mind that rejoices. If it has joy of its dwelling, ought it not to have joy of itself? And if the mind has whereof it may have delight outside itself, does it remain without delights within? It is quite certain that a man loves his soul more than his body. But further, a man loves the soul even in another man more than the body. What is it that is loved in a friend, where the love is the purer and more sincere? What in the friend is loved—the mind, or the body? If fidelity is loved, the mind is loved; if benevolence is loved, the mind is the seat of benevolence: if this is what thou lovest in another, that he too loves thee, it is the mind thou lovest, because it is not the flesh, but the mind that loves. For therefore thou lovest, because he loves thee: ask why he loves thee, and then see what it is thou lovest. Consequently, it is more loved, and yet is not seen.

Clamat ergo nobis Dominus: Stabat enim, et clamabat, Si quis sitit, veniat ad me, et bibat. Qui credit in me, sicut dicit Scriptura, flumina de ventre ejus fluent aquae vivae. Quid hoc esset, quando Evangelista exposuit, immorari non debemus. Unde enim dixerit Dominus, Si quis sitit, veniat ad me, et bibat, et, Qui credit in me, flumina de ventre ejus fluent aquae vivae; consequenter exposuit Evangelista, dicens: Hoc autem dixit de Spiritu quem accepturi erant credentes in eum. Nondum enim erat Spiritus datus, quia Jesus nondum erat glorificatus. Est ergo sitis interior et venter interior, quia est homo interior. Et ille quidem interior invisibilis, exterior autem visibilis: sed melior interior quam exterior. Et quod non videtur, hoc plus amatur: constat enim plus amari hominem interiorem quam exteriorem. Unde hoc constat? Unusquisque in seipso probet. Quamvis enim qui male vivunt, animos suos corpori addicant; vivere tamen volunt, quod non est nisi animi, magisque seipsos indicant qui regunt, quam illa quae reguntur. Regunt enim animi, reguntur corpora. Gaudet quisque voluptate, et capit de corpore voluptatem: sed separa animum, nihil restat in corpore quod gaudeat; et si de corpore gaudet, animus gaudet. Si gaudet de domo sua, de se non debet gaudere? et si habet animus unde oblectetur extrinsecus, sine deliciis manet intrinsecus? Omnino constat plus amare hominem animam suam quam corpus suum. Sed et in alio homine plus amat homo animam quam corpus. Quid enim amatur in amico, ubi est amor sincerior et castior? Quid amatur in amico; animus, an corpus? Si fides amatur, animus amatur: si benevolentia amatur, benevolentiae sedes animus est: si hoc amas in altero, quia et ipse amat te, animum amas; quia non caro, sed animus amat. Ideo enim amas, quia te amat: quaere unde te amet, et vide quid ames. Pius ergo amatur, et non videtur.

32.3 PL 35, 1643

3. I would say something further, by which it may more clearly appear to you, beloved, how much the mind is loved, and how it is preferred to the body. Those wanton lovers even, who delight in beauty of bodies, and are charmed by shapeliness of limbs, love the more when they are loved. For when a man loves, and finds that he is regarded with hatred, he feels more anger than liking. Why does he feel anger rather than liking? Because the love that he bestows is not given him in return. If, therefore, even the lovers of bodies desire to be loved in return, and this delights them more when they are loved, what shall we say of the lovers of minds? And if the lovers of minds are great, what shall we say of the lovers of God who makes minds beautiful? For as the mind gives grace to the body, so it is God that gives grace to the mind. For it is only the mind that causes that in the body by which it is loved; when the mind has left it, it is a corpse at which thou hast a horror; and how much soever thou mayest have loved its beautiful limbs, thou makest haste to bury it. Hence, the ornament of the body is the mind; the ornament of the mind is God.

Aliquid etiam volo dicere, ubi magis appareat Dilectioni vestrae quantum ametur animus, et quemadmodum corpori praeponatur. Illi ipsi lascivi amatores, qui pulchritudine corporum delcetantur, et forma membrorum accenduntur, tunc amant amplius quando amantur. Nam si amet et sentiat quia odio habetur, magis irascitur quam diligit. Quare magis irascitur quam diligit? Quia non ei redditur quod impendit. Si ergo ipsi corporum amatores redamari se volunt, et hoc eos magis delectat si amentur; quales sunt amatores animorum? Et si magni sunt amatores animorum, quales sunt amatores Dei, qui pulchros animos facit? Sicut enim animus facit decus in corpore, sic Deus in animo. Non enim facit corpori unde ametur nisi animus: qui cum migraverit, cadaver horrescis; et quantumcumque pulchra illa membra dilexeris, sepelire festinas. Decus ergo corporis, animus: decus animi, Deus.

32.4 PL 35, 1643

4. The Lord, therefore, cries aloud to us to come and drink, if we thirst within; and He says that when we have drunk, rivers of living water shall flow from our belly. The belly of the inner man is the conscience of the heart. Having drunk that water then, the conscience being purged begins to live; and drinking in, it will have a fountain, will be itself a fountain. What is the fountain, and what the river that flows from the belly of the inner man? Benevolence, whereby a man will consult the interest of his neighbor. For if he imagines that what he drinks ought to be only for his own satisfying, there is no flowing of living water from his belly; but if he is quick to consult for the good of his neighbor, then he becomes not dry, because there is a flowing. We will now see what it is that they drink who believe in the Lord; because we surely are Christians, and if we believe, we drink. And it is every man’s duty to know in himself whether or not he drinks, and whether he lives by what he drinks; for the fountain does not forsake us if we forsake not the fountain.

Clamat ergo Dominus ut veniamus et bibamus, si intus sitiamus; et dicit quia cum biberimus, flumina aquae vivae fluent de ventre nostro. Venter interioris hominis conscientia cordis est. Bibito ergo isto liquore vivescit purgata conscientia; et hauriens, fontem habebit; etiam ipsa fons erit. Quid est fons, et quid est fluvius qui manat de ventre interioris hominis? Benevolentia, qua vult consulere proximo. Si enim putet quia quod bibit soli ipsi debet sufficere; non fluit aqua viva de ventre ejus: si autem proximo festinat consulere; ideo non siccat, quia manat. Videbimus nunc quid sit quod bibunt, qui credunt in Domino; quia utique Christiani sumus, et si credimus, bibimus. Et unusquisque in seipso debet agnoscere si bibit, et si vivit ex eo quod bibit: non enim nos deserit fons, si non deseramus fontem.

32.5 PL 35, 1644

5. The evangelist explained, as I have said, whereof the Lord had cried out, to what kind of drink He had invited, what He had procured for them that drink, saying, “But this spake He of the Spirit, which they that believe on Him should receive: for the Spirit was not yet given, because Jesus was not yet glorified.” What spirit does He speak of, if not the Holy Spirit? For every man has in himself a spirit of his own, of which I spoke when I was commending to you the consideration of the mind. For every man’s mind is his own spirit: of which the Apostle Paul says, “For what man knoweth the things of a man, but the spirit of the man which is in himself?” And then he added, “So also the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God.” None knows the things that are ours but our own spirit. I indeed do not know what are thy thoughts, nor dost thou know what are mine; for those things which we think within are our own, peculiar to ourselves; and his own spirit is the witness of every man’s thoughts. “So also the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God.” We with our spirit, God with His: so, however, that God with His Spirit knows also what goes on within us; but we are not able, without His own Spirit, to know what takes place in God. God, however, knows in us even what we know not in ourselves. For Peter did not know his own weakness, when he heard from the Lord that he would deny Him thrice: the sick man was ignorant of his own condition; the Physician knew him to be sick. There are then certain things which God knows in us, while we ourselves know them not. So far, however, as belongs to men, no man knows a man as he does himself: another does not know what is going on within him, but his own spirit knows it. But on receiving the Spirit of God, we learn also what takes place in God: not the whole, for we have not received the whole. We know many things from the pledge; for we have received a pledge, and the fullness of this pledge shall be given hereafter. Meanwhile, let the pledge console us in our pilgrimage here; because he who has condescended to bind himself to us by a pledge, is prepared to give us much. If such is the token, what must that be of which it is the token?

Exposuit Evangelista, ut dixi, unde Dominus clamasset, ad qualem potum invitasset, quid bibentibus propinasset, dicens, Hoc autem dicebat de Spiritu quem accepturi erant credentes in eum. Nondum enim erat Spiritus datus, quia Jesus nondum erat glorificatus. Quem dicit Spiritum, nisi sanctum Spiritum? Nam unusquisque homo habet in se proprium spiritum, de quo loquebar cum animum commendarem. Animus enim cujusque, proprius est spiritus ejus: de quo dicit Paulus apostolus, Quis enim scit hominum quae sunt hominis, nisi spiritus hominis, qui in ipso est? deinde adjunxit, Sic et quae Dei sunt, nemo scit, nisi Spiritus Dei . Nostra nemo scit, nisi spiritus noster. Non enim novi quid cogitas, aut tu quid cogito: ipsa enim sunt propria nostra, quae interius cogitamus; et cogitationum uniuscujusque hominis ipsius spiritus testis est. Sic et quae Dei sunt, nemo scit, nisi Spiritus Dei. Nos cum spiritu nostro, Deus cum suo: ita tamen ut Deus cum suo Spiritu sciat etiam quid agatur in nobis; nos autem sine ejus Spiritu scire non possumus quid agatur in Deo. Deus autem scit in nobis et quod ipsi nescimus in nobis. Nam infirmitatem suam Petrus nesciebat, quando a Domino quod ter esset negaturus audiebat , et aeger se ignorabat; medicus aegrum sciebat. Sunt ergo quaedam quae Deus novit in nobis, nescientibus nobis. Tamen quantum ad homines pertinet, nemo sic se novit quomodo ipse homo: alius nescit quid in illo agatur, sed spiritus ejus novit. Accepto autem Spiritu Dei, discimus et quid agatur in Deo: non totum, quia non accepimus totum. De pignore multa novimus: pignus enim accepimus, et hujus pignoris plenitudo postea dabitur. Interim in hac peregrinatione pignus nos consoletur, quia qui nos dignatus est oppignerare, multum paratus est dare. Si talis est arrha, quid est cujus est arrha?

32.6 PL 35, 1644

6. But what is meant by this which he says, “For the Spirit was not yet given, because Jesus was not yet glorified?” He is understood to say this in a sense that is evident. For the meaning is not that the Spirit of God, which was with God, was not in being; but was not yet in them who had believed on Jesus. For thus the Lord Jesus disposed not to give them the Spirit of which we speak, until after His resurrection; and this not without a cause. And perhaps if we inquire, He will favor us to find; and if we knock, He will open for us to enter. Piety knocks, not the hand, though the hand also knocks, if it cease not from works of mercy. What then is the cause why the Lord Jesus Christ determined not to give the Holy Spirit until He should be glorified? which thing before we speak of as we may be able, we must first inquire, lest that should trouble any one, in what manner the Spirit was not yet in holy men, whilst we read in the Gospel concerning the Lord Himself newly born, that Simeon by the Holy Spirit recognized Him; that Anna the widow, a prophetess, also recognized Him; that John, who baptized Him, recognized Him; that Zacharias, being filled with the Holy Ghost, said many things; that Mary herself received the Holy Ghost to conceive the Lord. We have therefore many preceding evidences of the Holy Spirit before the Lord was glorified by the resurrection of His flesh. Nor was it another spirit that the prophets also had, who proclaimed beforehand the coming of Christ. But still, there was to be a certain manner of this giving, which had not at all appeared before. For nowhere do we read before this, that men being gathered together had, by receiving the Holy Ghost, spoken in the tongues of all nations. But after His resurrection, when He first appeared to His disciples, He said to them: “Receive ye the Holy Ghost.” Of this giving then it is said, “The Spirit was not given, because Jesus was not yet glorified. And He breathed upon their faces,” He who with His breath enlivened the first man, and raised him up from the clay, by which breath He gave a soul to the limbs; signifying that He was the same who breathed upon their faces, that they might rise out of the mire and renounce their miry works. Then, after His resurrection, which the evangelist calls His glorifying, did the Lord first give the Holy Ghost to His disciples. Then having tarried with them forty days, as the book of the Acts of the Apostles shows, while they were seeing Him and companying with Him, He ascended into heaven in their sight. There at the end of ten days, on the day of Pentecost, He sent the Holy Ghost from above. Which having received, they, who had been gathered together in one place, as I have said, being filled withal, spoke in the tongues of all nations.

Sed quid est quod ait, Non enim erat Spiritus datus, quia Jesus nondum erat glorificatus? In evidenti est intellectus. Non enim non erat Spiritus Dei, qui erat apud Deum; sed nondum erat in eis qui crediderant in Jesum. Ita enim disposuit Dominus Jesus non eis dare Spiritum istum de quo loquimur, nisi post resurrectionem suam; et hoc non sine causa. Et forte si quaeramus, annuet ut inveniamus; et si pulsemus, aperiet ut intremus. Pietas pulsat, non manus: quanquam pulsat et manus, si ab operibus misericordiae non cesset manus. Quae igitur causa est cur Dominus Jesus Christus statuerit nonnisi cum esset glorificatus, dare Spiritum sanctum? Quod antequam dicamus ut possumus, prius quaerendum est, ne quem forte moveat, quomodo nondum erat Spiritus in hominibus sanctis, cum de ipso Domino recens nato legatur in Evangelio, quod cum in Spiritu sancto agnoverit Simeon, agnoverit etiam Anna vidua prophetissa ; agnoverit Joannes ipse, qui eum baptizavit : impletus Spiritu sancto Zacharias multa dixit ; Spiritum sanctum ipsa Maria, ut Dominum conciperet, accepit . Multa ergo indicia praecedentia Spiritus sancti habemus, antequam Dominus glorificaretur resurrectione carnis suae. Non enim alium spiritum etiam Prophetae habuerunt, qui Christum venturum praenuntiaverunt. Sed modus quidam futurus erat dationis hujus, qui omnino antea non apparuerat: de ipso hic dicitur. Nusquam enim legimus antea congregatos homines accepto Spiritu sancto, linguis omnium gentium locutos fuisse. Post resurrectionem autem suam, primum quando apparuit discipulis suis, dixit illis: Accipite Spiritum sanctum. De hoc ergo dictum est, Non erat Spiritus datus, quia Jesus nondum erat glorificatus. Et insufflavit in faciem eorum , qui flatu primum hominem vivificavit, et de limo crexit, quo flatu animam membris dedit ; significans eum se esse qui insufflavit in faciem eorum, ut a luto exsurgerent, et luteis operibus renuntiarent. Tunc primum post resurrectionem suam Dominus, quam dicit Evangelista glorificationem, dedit discipulis suis Spiritum sanctum. Deinde commoratus cum eis quadraginta dies, ut liber Actuum Apostolorum demonstrat, ipsis videntibus, et videndo deducentibus, ascendit in coelum . Ibi peractis decem diebus, die Pentecostes misit desuper Spiritum sanctum. Quo, sicut dixi, qui fuerant in uno loco congregati, accepto impleti, omnium gentium linguis locuti sunt .

32.7 PL 35, 1645

7. How then, brethren, because he that is baptized in Christ, and believes on Him, does not speak now in the tongues of all nations, are we not to believe that he has received the Holy Ghost? God forbid that our heart should be tempted by this faithlessness. Certain we are that every man receives: but only as much as the vessel of faith that he shall bring to the fountain can contain, so much does He fill of it. Since, therefore, the Holy Ghost is even now received by men, some one may say, Why is it that no man speaks in the tongues of all nations? Because the Church itself now speaks in the tongues of all nations. Before, the Church was in one nation, where it spoke in the tongues of all. By speaking then in the tongues of all, it signified what was to come to pass; that by growing among the nations, it would speak in the tongues of all. Whoso is not in this Church, does not now receive the Holy Ghost. For, being cut off and divided from the unity of the members, which unity speaks in the tongues of all, let him declare for himself; he has it not. For if he has it, let him give the sign which was given then. What do we mean by saying, Let him give the sign which was then given? Let him speak in all tongues. He answers me: How then, dost thou speak in all tongues? Clearly I do; for every tongue is mine, namely, of the body of which I am a member. The Church, spread among the nations, speaks in all tongues; the Church is the body of Christ, in this body thou art a member: therefore, since thou art a member of that body which speaks with all tongues, believe that thou too speakest with all tongues. For the unity of the members is of one mind by charity; and that unity speaks as one man then spoke.

Quid ergo, fratres, quia modo qui baptizatur in Christo, et credit in Christum, non loquitur omnium gentium linguis, non est credendus accepisse Spiritum sanctum? Absit ut ista perfidia tentatur cor nostrum. Certi sumus omnem hominem accipere: sed quantum vas fidei attulerit ad fontem, tantum implet. Cum ergo et modo accipiatur, dixerit aliquis, quare nemo loquitur linguis omnium gentium? Quia jam ipsa Ecclesia linguis omnium gentium loquitur. Antea in una gente erat Ecclesia, ubi omnium linguis loquebatur. Loquendo linguis omnium, significabat futurum ut crescendo per gentes, loqueretur linguis omnium. In hac Ecclesia qui non est, nec modo accipit Spiritum sanctum. Praecisus enim et divisus ab unitate membrorum, quae unitas linguis omnium loquitur, renuntiet sibi; non habet. Nam si habet, det signum quod tunc dabatur. Quid est, det signum quod tunc dabatur? Loquatur omnibus linguis. Respondet mihi: Quid enim, tu loqueris omnibus linguis? Loquor plane, quia omnis lingua mea est, id est, ejus corporis cujus membrum sum. Diffusa Ecclesia per gentes loquitur omnibus linguis; Ecclesia est corpus Christi, in hoc corpore membrum es: cum ergo membrum sis ejus corporis quod loquitur omnibus linguis, crede te loqui omnibus linguis. Unitas enim membrorum charitate concordat; et ipsa unitas loquitur quomodo tunc unus homo loquebatur.

32.8 PL 35, 1645

8. Consequently, we too receive the Holy Ghost if we love the Church, if we are joined together by charity, if we rejoice in the Catholic name and faith. Let us believe, brethren; as much as every man loves the Church of Christ, so much has he the Holy Ghost. For the Spirit is given, as the apostle saith, “to manifestation.” To what manifestation? Just as the same apostle saith, “For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom, to another the word of knowledge after the same Spirit, to another faith in the same Spirit, to another the gift of healing in one Spirit, to another the working of miracles in the same Spirit.” For there are many gifts given to manifestation, but thou, it may be, hast nothing of all those I have said. If thou lovest, it is not nothing that thou hast: if thou lovest unity, whoever has aught in that unity has it also for thee. Take away envy, and what I have is thine too. The envious temper puts men apart, soundness of mind unites them. In the body, the eye alone sees; but is it for itself alone that the eye sees? It sees both for the hand and the foot, and for all the other members. If a blow be coming against the foot, the eye does not turn away from it, so as not to take precaution. Again, in the body, the hand alone works, but is it for itself alone the hand works? For the eye also it works: for if a coming blow comes, not against the hand, but only against the face, does the hand say, I will not move, because it is not coming to me? So the foot by walking serves all the members: all the other members are silent, and the tongue speaks for all. We have therefore the Holy Spirit if we love the Church; but we love the Church if we stand firm in its union and charity. For the apostle himself, after he had said that diverse gifts were bestowed on diverse men, just as the offices of the several members, saith, “Yet I show you a still more pre-eminent way;” and begins to speak of charity. This he put before tongues of men and angels, before miracles of faith, before knowledge and prophecy, before even that great work of mercy by which a man distributes to the poor all that he possesses; and, lastly, put it before even the martyrdom of the body: before all these so great things he put charity. Have it, and thou shalt have all: for without it, whatever thou canst have will profit nothing. But that thou mayest know that the charity of which we are speaking refers to the Holy Spirit (for the question now in hand in the Gospel is concerning the Holy Spirit), hear the apostle when he says, “The charity of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Spirit which is given to us.”

Accipimus ergo et nos Spiritum sanctum, si amamus Ecclesiam, si charitate compaginamur, si catholico nomine et fide gaudemus. Credamus, fratres; quantum quisque amat Ecclesiam Christi, tantum habet Spiritum sanctum. Datus est enim Spiritus, sicut Apostolus dicit, ad manifestationem. Quam manifestationem? Sicut ipse idem dicit, Quia alii datur per Spiritum sermo sapientiae, alii sermo scientiae secundum eumdem Spiritum, alii fides in eodem Spiritu, alii donatio curationum in uno Spiritu, alii operatio virtutum in eodem Spiritu. Multa enim dantur ad manifestationem, sed tu forsitan eorum omnium quae dixi nihil habes. Si amas, non nihil habes: si enim amas unitatem, etiam tibi habet quisquis in illa habet aliquid. Tolle invidiam, et tuum est quod habeo: tollam invidiam, et meum est quod habes. Livor separat, sanitas jungit. Oculus solus videt in corpore: sed numquid soli sibi oculus videt? Et manui videt, et pedi videt, et caeteris membris videt: non enim si aliquis ictus in pedem veniat, avertit se oculus inde ut non praecaveat. Rursus sola manus operatur in corpore; sed numquid sibi soli operatur? Et oculo operatur; nam si ictus aliquis veniens non eat in manum, sed tantum in faciem, numquid dicit manus, Non me moveo, quia non tendit ad me? Sic pes ambulando omnibus membris militat: membra caetera tacent, et lingua omnibus loquitur. Habemus ergo Spiritum sanctum, si amamus Ecclesiam: amamus autem, si in ejus compage et charitate consistimus. Nam ipse Apostolus cum dixisset diversa dona dari diversis hominibus, tanquam officia quorumque membrorum, Adhuc, inquit, supereminentiorem viam vobis demonstro, et coepit loqui de charitate. Praeposuit eam linguis hominum et Angelorum, praeposuit miraculis fidei, praeposuit scientiae et prophetiae, praeposuit etiam illi magno operi misericordiae, quo sua quae possidet distribuit quisque pauperibus; et ad extremum praeposuit eam etiam corporis passioni: his omnibus tam magnis rebus praeposuit charitatem . Ipsam habeto, et cuncta habebis: quia sine illa nihil proderit, quidquid habere potueris. Quia vero ad Spiritum sanctum pertinet charitas de qua loquimur (quaestio enim modo in Evangelio de Spiritu sancto retractatur), audi Apostolum dicentem, Charitas Dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris per Spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis .

32.9 PL 35, 1646

9. Why then was it the will of the Lord, seeing that the Spirit’s benefits in us are the greatest, because by Him the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts, to give us that Spirit after His resurrection? Why did He signify by this? In order that in our resurrection our love may be inflamed, and may part from the love of the world to run wholly towards God. For here we are born and die: let us not love this world; let us migrate hence by love; by love let us dwell above, by that love by which we love God. In this sojourn of our life let us meditate on nothing else, but that here we shall not always be, and that by good living we shall prepare a place for ourselves there, whence we shall never migrate. For our Lord Jesus Christ, after that He is risen again, “now dieth no more;” “death,” as the apostle says, “shall no more have dominion over Him.” Behold what we must love. If we live, if we believe on Him who is risen again, He will give us, not that which men love here who love not God, or love the more the less they love Him, but love this the less the more they love Him; but let us see what He has promised us. Not earthly and temporal riches, not honors and power in this world; for you see all these things given to wicked men, that they may not be highly prized by the good. Not, in short, bodily health itself, though it is He that gives that also, but that, as you see, He gives even to the beasts. Not long life; for what, indeed, is long that will some day have an end? It is not length of days that He has promised to His believers, as if that were a great thing, or decrepit old age, which all wish for before it comes, and all murmur at when it does come. Not beauty of person, which either bodily disease or that same old age which is desired drives away. One wishes to be beautiful, and also to live to be old: these two desires cannot agree together; if thou shalt be old, thou wilt not be beautiful; when old age comes, beauty will flee away; the vigor of beauty and the groaning of old age cannot dwell together in one body. All these things, then, are not what He promised us when He said, “He that believeth in me, let him come and drink, and out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.” He has promised us eternal life, where we shall have no fear, where we shall not be troubled, whence we shall have no migration, where we shall not die; where there is neither bewailing a predecessor deceased, nor a hoping for a successor. Accordingly, because such is what He has promised to us that love Him, and glow with the charity of the Holy Spirit, therefore He would not give us that same Spirit until He should be glorified, so that He might show in His body the life which we have not now, but which we hope for in the resurrection.

Quare ergo Dominus Spiritum, cujus maxima beneficia sunt in nobis, quia charitas Dei per ipsum diffusa est in cordibus nostris, post resurrectionem suam dare voluit? quid significavit? Ut in resurrectione nostra charitas nostra flagret, et ab amore saeculi separet, ut tota currat in Deum. Hic enim nascimur et morimur, hoc non amemus: charitate migremus, charitate sursum habitemus, charitate illa qua diligimus Deum. Nihil aliud in hac vitae nostrae peregrinatione meditemur, nisi quia et hic non semper erimus, et ibi nobis locum bene vivendo praeparabimus, unde nunquam migremus. Dominus enim noster Jesus Christus, posteaquam resurrexit, jam non moritur; mors illi ultra, sicut Apostolus dicit, non dominabitur . Ecce quod amemus. Si vivimus, si in ipsum credimus qui resurrexit; dabit nobis, non quod hic amant homines qui Deum non amant, aut tanto plus amant, quanto illum minus amant: tanto autem hoc minus amant, quanto illum plus amant. Sed videamus quid nobis promisit: non divitias terrenas et temporales, non honores et potestates in saeculo isto; videtis enim omnia haec dari et hominibus malis, ne magnipendantur a bonis. Non ipsam postremo corporis sanitatem: non quia ipse illam non dat, sed quia, ut videtis, et pecoribus dat. Non vitam longam. Quid est enim longum quod aliquando finitur? Non pro magno nobis credentibus promisit longaevitatem, aut decrepitam senectutem; quam omnes optant antequam veniat, omnes de illa cum venerit murmurant. Non pulchritudinem corporis, quam vel corporis morbus, vel ipsa senectus quae optatur exterminat. Vult esse pulcher, et vult esse senex: ista duo desideria sibi invicem concordare non possunt: si senex eris, pulcher non eris: quando senectus venerit, pulchritudo fugiet; et in uno habitare non possunt vigor pulchritudinis, et gemitus senectutis. Omnia ergo ista non nobis promisit, qui dixit, Qui credit in me, veniat, et bibat; et flumina de ventre ejus fluent aquae vivae. Vitam aeternam promisit, ubi nihil timeamus, ubi non conturbemur, unde non migremus, ubi non moriamur; ubi nec decessor plangatur, nec successor speretur. Quia ergo tale est quod nobis promisit amantibus, et Spiritus sancti charitate ferventibus; ideo ipsum Spiritum noluit dare, nisi cum esset glorificatus: ut in suo corpore ostenderet vitam, quam modo non habemus, sed in resurrectione speramus.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Salva per dopo

Inserisci la tua email: ti invieremo un link per accedere. Nessuna password. Ciò che salvi (voci, versetti, capitoli, documenti) ti segue su ogni dispositivo.