Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 20

St Augustine of Hippo (AD 354–430) · In Joannis evangelium tractatus CXXIV · PL 35, 1379–1976

20.1 Chapter V. 19 PL 35, 1556

1. The words of our Lord Jesus Christ, especially those recorded by the Evangelist John,—who not without cause leaned on the Lord’s bosom, that he might drink in the secrets of that higher wisdom, and by evangelizing give forth again what by loving he had drunk in,—are so secret and profound of understanding, that they trouble all who are perverse of heart, and exercise all who are in heart upright. Wherefore, beloved, give heed to these few words that have been read. Let us see if in any wise we can, by His own gift and help who has willed His words to be recited to us, which at that time were heard and committed to writing that they might now be read, what He means in what ye have now heard Him say: “Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son cannot of Himself do anything, but what He seeth the Father doing: for what things soever the Father doeth, these same the Son also doeth in like manner.”

Verba Domini nostri Jesu Christi, maxime quae Joannes commemorat evangelista, qui non sine causa super pectus Domini discumbebat , nisi ut secreta altioris sapientiae ejus ebiberet, et quod amando biberat, evangelizando ructaret, ita secreta sunt et profunda intelligentiae, ut omnes turbent qui perverso sunt corde, et omnes exerceant qui recto sunt corde. Proinde animadvertat Charitas vestra ad haec pauca quae lecta sunt. Videamus si quo modo possumus donante et adjuvante ipso qui verba sua nobis voluit recitari, quae tunc audita atque conscripta sunt, ut modo legerentur, quid sibi velit quod eum audistis modo dicere, Amen, amen dico vobis, non potest Filius a se facere quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem: quaecumque enim Pater facit, haec eadem et Filius facit similiter.

20.2 PL 35, 1556

2. Now you need to be reminded whence this discourse arose, by reason of what precedes this passage, where the Lord had cured a certain man among those who were lying in the five porches of that pool of Solomon, and to whom He had said, “Take up thy bed, and go unto thy house.” But this He had done on the Sabbath; and hence the Jews, being troubled, were falsely accusing Him as a destroyer and transgressor of the law. He then said to them, “My Father worketh even until now, and I work.” For they, taking the observance of the Sabbath in a carnal sense, fancied that God had, as it were, slept after the labor of framing the world even to this day; and that therefore He had sanctified that day, from which He began to rest as from labor. Now, to our fathers of old there was ordained a sacrament of the Sabbath, which we Christians observe spiritually, in abstaining from every servile work, that is, from every sin (for the Lord saith, “Every one that committeth sin is the servant of sin”), and in having rest in our heart, that is, spiritual tranquillity. And although in this life we strive after this rest, yet not until we have departed this life shall we attain to that perfect rest. But the reason why God is said to have rested is, that He made no creature after all was finished. Moreover, the Scripture called it rest, to admonish us that after good works we shall rest. For thus we have it written in Genesis, “And God made all things very good, and God rested on the seventh day,” in order that thou, O man, considering that God Himself is said to have rested after good works, shouldest not expect rest for thyself, until after thou hast wrought good works; and even as God after He made man in His own image and likeness, and in him finished all His works very good, rested on the seventh day, so mayest thou also not expect rest to thyself, except thou return to that likeness in which thou wast made, which likeness thou hast lost by sinning. For, in reality, God cannot be said to have toiled, who “said, and they were done.” Who is there that, after such facility of work, desires to rest as if after labor? If He commanded and some one resisted Him, if He commanded and it was not done, and labored that it might be done, then justly He should be said to have rested after labor. But when in that same book of Genesis we read, “God said, Let there be light, and there was light; God said, Let there be a firmament, and the firmament was made, and all the rest were made immediately at His word: to which also the psalm testifies, saying, “He spake, and they were made; He commanded, and they were created,”—how could He require rest after the world was made, as if to enjoy leisure after toil, He who in commanding never toiled? Consequently these sayings are mystical, and are laid down in this wise that we may be looking for rest after this life, provided we have done good works. Accordingly, the Lord, restraining the impudence and refuting the error of the Jews, and showing them that they did not think rightly of God, says to them, when they were offended at His working men’s healing on the Sabbath, “My Father worketh until now, and I work:” do not therefore suppose that my Father so rested on the Sabbath, that thenceforth He doth not work; but even as He now worketh, so I also work. But as the Father without toil, so too the Son without toil. God “said, and they were done;” Christ said to the impotent man, “Take up thy bed, and go unto thy house,” and it was done.

Unde autem natus sit sermo iste, commemorandi estis propter superiora lectionis, ubi curaverat Dominus quemdam inter illos qui in quinque porticibus piscinae illius Salomonis jacebant, cui dixerat, Tolle grabatum tuum, et vade in domum tuam. Hoc autem fecerat sabbatis: unde perturbati Judaei calumniabantur, quasi eversorem et praevaricatorem Legis. Tunc eis dixerat, Pater meus usque modo operatur, et ego operor . Illi enim carnaliter accipientes sabbati observationem, putabant Deum post laborem fabricati mundi usque ad hunc diem quasi dormire; et propterea sanctificasse illum diem, ex quo coepit velut a laboribus requiescere. Est autem sacramentum sabbati antiquis patribus nostris praeceptum , quod nos Christiani spiritualiter observamus, ut ab omni servili opere, id est ab omni peccato (quia Dominus dicit, Omnis qui facit peccatum, servus est peccati , abstineamus nos, et habeamus quietem in corde nostro, id est tranquillitatem spiritualem. Et quamvis in hoc saeculo id conemur, ad eam tamen requiem perfectam non perveniemus, nisi cum de hac vita exierimus. Sed ideo dictum est Deum requievisse, quia jam creaturam nullam condebat postquam perfecta sunt omnia. Quietem vero propterea appellavit Scriptura, ut nos admoneret post bona opera requieturos. Sic enim scriptum habemus in Genesi, Et fecit Deus omnia bona valde, et requievit Deus die septimo : ut tu homo cum attendis ipsum Deum post bona opera requievisse, non tibi speres requiem, nisi cum bona fueris operatus: et quemadmodum Deus posteaquam fecit hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem suam sexto die, et in illo perfecit omnia opera sua bona valde, requievit septimo die; sic et tibi requiem non speres, nisi cum redieris ad similitudinem in qua factus es, quam peccando perdidisti. Non enim Deus laborasse dicendus est, qui dixit et facta sunt. Quis est qui post tantam operis facilitatem quasi post laborem velit requiescere? Si jussit et aliquis ei restitit, si jussit et non est factum, et ut fieret laboravit; merito dicatur post laborem requievisse: cum vero et in ipso libro Geneseos legamus, Dixit Deus, Fiat lux; et facta est lux: dixit Deus, Fiat firmamentum; et factum est firmamentum ; et caetera in verbo ejus continuo facta: cui attestatur et Psalmus dicens, Ipse dixit, et facta sunt; ipse mandavit, et creata sunt : quomodo post mundum factum requiem quasi ut cessaret requirebat, qui in jubendo nunquam laboraverat? Ergo illa mystica sunt, et propterea ita posita, ut nobis requiem speremus post hanc vitam, sed si bona opera fecerimus. Ideo Dominus retundens impudentiam et errorem Judaeorum, et ostendens eos non recte sapere de Deo, ait illis scandalizatis quod sabbato operabatur hominum sanitatem, Pater meus usque modo operatur, et ego operor: nolite ergo hoc putare quia sabbato ita requievit Pater meus, ut ex illo non operetur; sed sicut ipse nunc operatur, operor et ego. Sed sicut Pater sine labore, sic et Filius sine labore. Dixit Deus, et facta sunt: dixit Christus languenti, Tolle grabatum tuum, et vade in domum tuam, et factum est.

20.3 PL 35, 1557

3. But the catholic faith has it, that the works of the Father and of the Son are not separable. This is what I wish, if possible, to speak to you, beloved; but, according to those words of the Lord, “he that is able to receive it, let him receive it.” But he that is not able to receive it, let him not charge it on me, but on his own dullness; and let him turn to Him that opens the heart, that He may pour in what He freely giveth. And, lastly, if any one may not have understood, because I have not declared it as I ought to have declared it, let him excuse the weakness of man, and supplicate the divine goodness. For we have within a Master, Christ. Whatever ye are not able to receive through your ear and my mouth, turn ye in your heart to Him who both teacheth me what to speak, and distributeth to you in what measure He deigns. He who knows what to give, and to whom to give, will help him that seeketh, and open to him that knocketh. And if so be that He give not, let no one call himself forsaken. For it may be that He delays to give something, but He leaves none hungry. If, indeed, He give not at the hour, He is exercising the seeker, He is not scorning the suitor. Look ye, then, and give heed to what I wish to say, even if I should not be able to say it. The catholic faith, confirmed by the Spirit of God in His saints, has this against all heretical perverseness, that the works of the Father and of the Son are inseparable. What is this that I have said? As the Father and the Son are inseparable, so also the works of the Father and of the Son are inseparable. How are the Father and the Son inseparable, since Himself said, “I and the Father are one?” Because the Father and the Son are not two Gods, but one God, the Word and He whose the Word is, One and the Only One, Father and Son bound together by charity, One God, and the Spirit of Charity also one, so that Father, Son, and Holy Spirit is made the Trinity. Therefore, not only of the Father and Son, but also of the Holy Spirit; as there is equality and inseparability of persons, so also the works are inseparable. I will tell you yet more plainly what is meant by “the works are inseparable.” The catholic faith does not say that God the Father made something, and the Son made some other thing; but what the Father made, that also the Son made, that also the Holy Spirit made. For all things were made by the Word; when “He spoke and they were done,” it is by the Word they were done, by Christ they were done. For “in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God: all things were made by Him.” If all things were made by Him, “God said, Let there be light, and there was light; in the Word He made, by the Word He made.

Catholica autem fides habet, quod Patris et Filii opera non sunt separabilia. Hoc est quod volo, si possum, loqui Charitati vestrae: sed secundum illa verba Domini, Qui potest capere capiat . Qui autem capere non potest, non mihi adscribat, sed tarditati suae; et convertat se ad illum qui cor aperit, ut infundat quod donat. Postremo et si quisquam propterea non intellexerit, quia non a me sic dictum est ut dici debuit, ignoscat humanae fragilitati, et supplicet divinae bonitati. Habemus enim intus magistrum Christum. Quidquid per aurem vestram, et os meum capere non potueritis, in corde vestro ad cum convertimini, qui et me docet quod loquor, et vobis quemadmodum dignatur distribuit. Qui novit quid det, et cui det, aderit petenti, et aperiet pulsanti. Et si forte non dederit, nemo se dicat desertum. Forte enim aliquid dare differt, sed neminem esurientem relinquit. Si enim non dat ad horam, exercet quaerentem, non contemnit petentem. Videte ergo et attendite quid velim dicere, etsi forte non possim. Catholica fides hoc habet, firmata Spiritu Dei in sanctis ejus, contra omnem haereticam pravitatem, quia Patris et Filii opera inseparabilia sunt. Quid est quod dixi? Quomodo ipse Pater et Filius inseparabiles sunt, sic et opera Patris et Filii inseparabilia sunt. Quomodo Pater et Filius inseparabiles sunt? Quia ipse dixit, Ego et Pater unum sumus . Quia Pater et Filius non sunt duo dii, sed unus Deus, Verbum et cujus est Verbum, unus et Unicus, Deus unus Pater et Filius charitate complexi, unusque charitatis Spiritus eorum est, ut fiat Trinitas Pater et Filius et Spiritus sanctus. Non ergo tantum Patris et Filii, sed et Spiritus sancti, sicut aequalitas et inseparabilitas personarum, ita etiam opera inseparabilia sunt. Adhuc planius dicam quid sit, opera inseparabilia sunt. Non dicit catholica fides quia fecit Deus Pater aliquid, et fecit Filius aliquid aliud: sed quod fecit Pater, hoc et Filius fecit, hoc et Spiritus sanctus fecit. Per Verbum enim facta sunt omnia: quando dixit et facta sunt, per Verbum facta sunt, per Christum facta sunt. In principio enim erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum: omnia per ipsum facta sunt . Si omnia per ipsum facta sunt; dixit Deus, Fiat lux; et facta est lux: in Verbo fecit, per Verbum fecit.

20.4 PL 35, 1558

4. Behold, then, we have now heard the Gospel, where He answered the Jews who were indignant “that He not only broke the Sabbath, but said also that God was His Father, making Himself equal with God.” For so it is written in the foregoing paragraph. When, therefore, the Son of God, the Truth, made answer to their erring indignation, saith He, “Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son cannot of Himself do anything, but what He seeth the Father doing;” as if He said, “Why are ye offended because I have said that God is my Father, and that I make myself equal with God? I am equal in that wise that He begat me; I am equal in that wise that He is not from me, but I from Him.” For this is implied in these words: “The Son cannot do anything of Himself, but what He seeth the Father doing.” That is, whatever the Son hath to do, the doing it He hath of the Father. Why of the Father hath He the doing it? Because of the Father He hath it that He is Son. Why hath He it of the Father to be Son? Because of the Father He hath it that He is able, of the Father that He is. For, to the Son, both to be able and to be is the self-same thing. It is not so with man. Raise your hearts by all means from a comparison of human weakness, that lies far beneath; and should any of us perhaps reach to the secret, and, while awe-struck by the brilliance as it were of a great light, should discern somewhat, and not remain wholly ignorant; yet let him not imagine that he understands the whole, lest he should become proud, and lose what knowledge he has gotten. With man, to be and to be able are different things. For sometimes the man is, and yet cannot what he wills; sometimes, again, the man is in such wise, that he can what he wills; therefore his being and his being able are different things. For if man’s esse and posse were the same thing, then he could when he would. But with God it is not so, that His substance to be is one thing, and His power to be able another thing; but whatever is His, and whatever He is, is consubstantial with Him, because He is God: it is not so that in one way He is, in another way is able; He has the esse and the posse together, because He has to will and to do together. Since, then, the power of the Son is of the Father, therefore also the substance of the Son is of the Father; and since the substance of the Son is of the Father, therefore the power of the Son is of the Father. In the Son, power and substance are not different: the power is the self-same that the substance is; the substance to be, the power to be able. Accordingly, because the Son is of the Father, He said, “The Son cannot of Himself do anything.” Because He is not Son from Himself, therefore He is not able from Himself.

Ecce ergo nunc audivimus Evangelium, cum responderet stomachantibus Judaeis, quia non solum solvebat sabbatum, sed etiam patrem suum dicebat Deum, aequalem se faciens Deo : sic enim scriptum est in superiori capitulo. Cum ergo tali eorum erranti indignationi Dei Filius et Veritas responderet, ait, Amen, amen dico vobis, non potest Filius a se facere quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem. Tanquam diceret, Quid scandalizati estis, quia Patrem meum dixi Deum, et quia aequalem me facio Deo? Ita sum aequalis, ut ille me genuerit: ita sum aequalis, ut non ille a me, sed ego ab illo sim. Hoc enim intelligitur in his verbis, Non potest Filius a se facere quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem. Hoc est, quidquid Filius habet ut faciat, a Patre habet ut faciat. Quare habet a Patre ut faciat? Quia a Patre habet ut Filius sit. Quare a Patre habet ut Filius sit? Quia a Patre habet ut possit, quia a Patre habet ut sit. Filio enim hoc est esse quod posse. Homini non ita est. Ex comparatione humanae infirmitatis, longe infra jacentis, utcumque corda sustollite; et ne forte aliquis nostrum attingat secretum, et quasi coruscatione magnae lucis horrescens, sapiat aliquid, ne insipiens remaneat: non tamen se totum sapere putet, ne superbiat, et quod sapuit amittat. Homo aliud est quod est, aliud quod potest. Aliquando enim et est homo, et non potest quod vult; aliquando autem sic est homo, ut possit quod vult: itaque aliud est esse ipsius, aliud posse ipsius. Si enim hoc esset esse ipsius, quod est posse ipsius; cum vellet posset. Deus autem cui non est alia substantia ut sit, et alia potestas ut possit, sed consubstantiale illi est quidquid ejus est, et quidquid est, quia Deus est, non alio modo est, et alio modo potest; sed esse et posse simul habet, quia velle et facere simul habet. Quia ergo potentia Filii de Patre est, ideo et substantia Filii de Patre est; et quia substantia Filii de Patre, ideo potentia Filii de Patre est. Non alia potentia est in Filio, et alia substantia: sed ipsa est potentia quae et substantia; substantia ut sit, potentia ut possit. Ergo quia Filius de Patre est, ideo dixit, Filius non potest a se facere quidquam. Quia non est Filius a se, ideo non potest a se.

20.5 PL 35, 1559

5. He appears to have made Himself as it were less, when He said, “The Son cannot of Himself do anything, but what He seeth the Father doing.” Hereupon heretical vanity lifts the neck; theirs, indeed, who say that the Son is less than the Father, of less authority, of less majesty, of less possibility, not understanding the mystery of Christ’s words. But attend, beloved, and see how they are confounded in their carnal intellect by the words of Christ. And this is what I said a little before, that the word of God troubles all perverse hearts, just as it exercises pious hearts, especially that spoken by the Evangelist John. For they are deep words that are spoken by him, not random words, nor such as may be easily understood. So, a heretic, if he happen to hear these words, immediately rises and says to us, “Lo, the Son is less than the Father; hear the words of the Son, who says, ‘The Son cannot do anything of Himself, but what He seeth the Father doing.’” Wait; as it is written, “Be meek to hear the word, that thou mayest understand.” Well, suppose that because I assert the power and majesty of the Father and of the Son to be equal, I was disconcerted at hearing these words, “The Son cannot do anything of Himself, but what He seeth the Father doing.” Well, I, being disconcerted at these words, will ask thee, who seemest to thyself to have instantly understood them, a question. We know in the Gospel that the Son walked upon the sea; when saw He the Father walk upon the sea? Here now he is disconcerted. Lay aside, then, thy understanding of the words, and let us examine them together. What do we then? We have heard the words of the Lord: “The Son cannot of Himself do anything, but what He seeth the Father doing.” The Son walked upon the sea, the Father never walked upon the sea. Yet certainly “the Son cannot of Himself do anything, but what He seeth the Father doing.”

Videtur enim quasi minorem se fecisse, cum dixit, Non potest Filius a se facere quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem. Hic erigit cervicem haeretica vanitas, eorum scilicet qui dicunt Filium minorem esse quam Patrem, minoris potestatis, majestatis, possibilitatis, non intelligentes mysterium verborum Christi. Attendat autem Charitas vestra, et videte quemadmodum in carnali suo intellectu modo turbentur in ipsis verbis Christi. Hoc autem paulo ante praelocutus sum, quia omnia perversa corda perturbat, sicut pia corda exercet Verbum Dei, maxime quod per Joannem evangelistam dicitur. Alta enim per illum dicuntur, non qualiacumque, non quae facile intelligantur. Ecce jam haereticus si forte audit verba ista, erigit se, et dicit nobis: Ecce minor est Filius quam Pater, ecce audi verba Filii, qui dicit, Non potest Filius a se facere quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem. Exspecta, quemadmodum scriptum est, Esto mansuetus ad audiendum verbum, ut intelligas . Puta enim me conturbatum esse his verbis, quoniam dico aequalem potestatem majestatemque esse Patris et Filii, cum audivi, Non potest Filius a se facere quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem. Turbatus his verbis quaero abs te, qui jam tibi videris intellexisse: Novimus in Evangelio Filium ambulasse super mare ; ubi Patrem vidit ambulasse super mare? Hic jam ille turbatur. Pone ergo quod intellexeras, et simul quaeramus. Quid ergo facimus? Verba Domini audivimus, Non potest Filius a se facere quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem. Ambulavit ipse super mare, Pater nunquam ambulavit super mare. Certe non facit Filius quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem.

20.6 PL 35, 1559

6. Return then with me to what I was saying, in case it is so to be understood that we may both escape from the question. For I see how I, according to the catholic faith, may escape without tripping or stumbling; whilst thou, on the other hand, shut in on every side, art seeking a way of escape. See by what way thou hast entered. Perhaps thou hast not understood this that I said, See by what way thou hast entered: hear Himself saying, “I am the door.” Not without cause, then, art thou seeking how thou mayest get out; and this only thou findest, that thou hast not entered by the door, but fell in over the wall. Therefore raise thyself up from thy fall how thou canst, and enter by the door, that thou mayest go in without stumbling, and go out without straying. Come by Christ, not bringing forward of thy own heart what thou mayest say; but what He shows, that speak. Behold how the catholic faith gets clear of this question. The Son walked upon the sea, planted the feet of flesh on the waves: the flesh walked, and the divinity directed. But when the flesh was walking and the divinity directing, was the Father absent? If absent, how doth the Son Himself say, “but the Father abiding in me, Himself doeth the works?” If the Father, abiding in the Son, Himself doeth His works, then that walking upon the sea was made by the Father, and through the Son. Accordingly, that walking is an inseparable work of Father and Son. I see both acting in it. Neither the Father forsook the Son, nor the Son left the Father. Thus, whatever the Son doeth, He doeth not without the Father; because whatever the Father doeth, He doeth not without the Son.

Redi ergo mecum ad id quod dicebam, ne forte sic intelligendum sit, ut de quaestione ambo exeamus. Nam ego secundum fidem catholicam video quomodo exeam sine offensione, sine scandalo: tu autem circumclusus, quaeris qua exeas. Qua intraveras vide. Forte non intellexisti et hoc quod dixi, Qua intraveras vide: ipsum audi dicentem, Ego sum janua . Non sine causa ergo quaeris qua exeas, et non invenis, nisi quia non per januam intrasti, sed per maceriam cecidisti. Ergo quemadmodum potes, a ruina tua collige te, et intra per januam, ut sine offensione intres, et sine errore exeas. Per Christum veni, nec ex corde tuo afferas quod dicas; sed quod ille ostendit, hoc loquere. Ecce fides catholica quemadmodum exit de ista propositione. Ambulavit Filius super mare, pedes carnis fluctibus imposuit; caro ambulabat, et divinitas gubernabat: quando ergo caro ambulabat et divinitas gubernabat, Pater absens erat? Si absens erat, quomodo ipse Filius dicit, Pater autem in me manens, ipse facit opera sua ? Si ergo Pater in Filio manens, ipse facit opera sua; ambulatio illa carnis supra mare, a Patre fiebat, per Filium fiebat. Ergo illa ambulatio opus est Patris et Filii inseparabile. Utrumque ibi operantem video: nec Pater Filium deseruit, nec Filius a Patre discessit. Ita quidquid facit Filius, non facit sine Patre; quia quidquid facit Pater, non facit sine Filio.

20.7 PL 35, 1560

7. We have got clear of this question. Mark ye that rightly we say the works of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit are inseparable. But as thou understandest it, lo, God made the light, and the Son saw the Father making light, according to thy carnal understanding, who wilt have it that He is less, because He said, “The Son cannot of Himself do anything, but what He seeth the Father doing.” God the Father made light; what other light did the Son make? God the Father made the firmament, the heaven between waters and waters; and the Son saw Him, according to thy dull and sluggish understanding. Well, since the Son saw the Father making the firmament, and also said, “The Son cannot of Himself do anything, but what He seeth the Father doing,” then show me the other firmament made by the Son. Hast thou lost the foundation? But they that are “built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ Himself being the chief corner-stone,” are brought into a state of peace in Christ; nor do they strive and wander in heresy. Therefore we understand that the light was made by God the Father, but through the Son; that the firmament was made by God the Father, but through the Son. For “all things were made through Him, and without Him was nothing made.” Cast out thine understanding, which ought not to be called understanding, but evidently foolishness. God the Father made the world; what other world did the Son make? Show me the Son’s world. Whose is this world in which we are? Tell us, by whom made? If thou sayest, “By the Son, not by the Father,” then thou hast erred from the Father; if thou sayest, “By the Father, not by the Son,” the Gospel answers thee thus, “And the world was made by (through) Him, and the world knew Him not.” Acknowledge Him, then, by whom the world was made, and be not among those who knew not Him that made the world.

Exitum est hinc. Videte quia recte nos dicimus inseparabilia esse opera Patris et Filii et Spiritus sancti. Nam quomodo tu intelligis, ecce fecit Deus lucem, et vidit Filius Patrem facientem lucem, secundum carnalem intellectum tuum, qui ideo vis minorem intelligere, quia dixit, Non potest Filius a se facere quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem. Fecit Deus Pater lucem; quam lucem aliam fecit Filius? Fecit Deus Pater firmamentum, coelum inter aquas et aquas, vidit eum Filius secundum intelligentiam tuam tardam et grossam: quia vidit Filius Patrem facientem firmamentum, et dixit, Non potest Filius a se facere quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem, da mihi alterum firmamentum. An tu amisisti fundamentum? Superaedificati autem supra fundamentum Apostolorum et Prophetarum, ipso summo lapide angulari existente Christo Jesu, pacantur in Christo ; nec contendunt et errant in haeresi. Intelligimus ergo lucem factam a Deo Patre, sed per Filium; firmamentum factum a Deo Patre, sed per Filium. Omnia enim per ipsum facta sunt, et sine ipso factum est nihil. Excute intelligentiam tuam; nec intelligentiam vocandam, sed plane stultitiam. Deus Pater fecit mundum: quem fecit Filius alterum mundum? da mihi mundum Filii. Iste in quo sumus, cujus est? dic nobis, a quo factus est? Si dixeris, A Filio; non a Patre; errasti a Patre: si dixeris, A Patre, non a Filio; respondet tibi Evangelium, Et mundus per eum factus est, et mundus eum non cognovit . Agnosce ergo eum per quem factus est mundus, et noli esse inter illos qui eum qui fecit mundum non cognoverunt.

20.8 PL 35, 1560

8. Wherefore the works of the Father and of the Son are inseparable. Moreover, this, “The Son cannot do anything of Himself,” would mean the same thing as if He were to say, “The Son is not from Himself.” For if He is a Son, He was begotten; if begotten, He is from Him of whom He is begotten. Nevertheless, the Father begat Him equal to Himself. Nor was aught wanting to Him that begat; He who begat a co-eternal required not time to beget: who produced the Word of Himself, required not a mother to beget by; the Father begetting did not precede the Son in age, so that He should beget a Son younger than Himself. But perhaps some one may say, that after many ages God begat a Son in His old age. Even as the Father is without age, so the Son is without growth; neither has the one grown old nor the other increased, but equal begat equal, eternal begat eternal. How, says some one, has eternal begat eternal? As a temporary flame generates a temporary light. The generating flame is coeval with the light which it generates: the generating flame does not precede in time the generated light; but from the moment the flame begins, from that moment the light begins. Show me flame without light, and I show thee God the Father without Son. Accordingly, “the Son cannot do anything of Himself, but what He seeth the Father doing,” implies, that for the Son to see and to be begotten of the Father, is the same thing. His seeing and His substance are not different; nor are His power and substance different. All that He is, He is of the Father; all that He can is of the Father; because what He can and what He is is one thing, and all of the Father.

Inseparabilia sunt ergo opera Patris et Filii. Sed hoc est, Non potest Filius a se quidquam facere, quod esset si diceret, Non est Filius a se. Etenim si Filius est, natus est: si natus est, ab illo est de quo natus est. Sed tamen aequalem sibi genuit. Non enim defuit aliquid generanti, aut tempus quaesivit ut generaret, qui genuit coaeternum; aut matrem quaesivit ut generaret, qui de se protulit Verbum; aut Pater generans aetate praecesserat Filium, ut minorem Filium generaret. Et forte dicit aliquis quia post multa saecula in senecta sua Deus suscepit Filium. Sicut Pater sine senectute, sic et Filius sine incremento: nec ille senuit nec ille crevit; sed aequalis aequalem genuit, aeternus aeternum. Quomodo, inquit aliquis, aeternus aeternum? Quomodo flamma temporalis generat lucem temporalem. Coaeva est autem flamma generans luci quam generat, nec praecedit tempore flamma generans lucem generatam; sed ex quo incipit flamma, ex illo incipit lux. Da mihi flammam sine luce, et do tibi Deum Patrem sine Filio, Hoc est ergo, Non potest Filius a se facere quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem; quia videre Filii, hoc est natum esse de Patre. Non alia visio ejus et alia substantia ejus: nec alia potentia ejus, alia substantia ejus. Totum quod est, de Patre est; totum quod potest, de Patre est: quoniam quod potest et est, hoc unum est; et de Patre totum est.

20.9 PL 35, 1561

9. Moreover, He goes on in His own words, and troubles those that understand the matter amiss, in order to recall the erring to a right apprehension of it. After He had said, “The Son cannot of Himself do anything, but what He seeth the Father doing;” lest a carnal understanding of the matter should by chance creep in and turn the mind aside, and a man should imagine as it were two mechanics, one a master, the other a learner, attentively observing the master while making, say a chest, so that, as the master made the chest, the learner should make another chest according to the appearance which he looked upon while the master wrought; lest, I say, the carnal mind should frame to itself any such twofold notion in the case of the divine unity, going on, He saith, “For what things soever the Father doeth, these same also the Son doeth in like manner.” It is not, the Father doeth some, the Son others like them, but the same in like manner. For He saith not, What things soever the Father doeth, the Son also doeth others the like; but saith He, “What things soever the Father doeth, these same also the Son doeth in like manner.” What things the Father doeth, these also the Son doeth: the Father made the world, the Son made the world, the Holy Ghost made the world. If three Gods, then three worlds; if one God, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, then one world was made by the Father, through the Son, in the Holy Ghost. Consequently the Son doeth those things which also the Father doeth, and doeth not in a different manner; He both doeth these, and doeth them in like manner.

Sequitur et ipse in verbis suis, et male intelligentes conturbat, ut ad rectum intellectum revocet errantes. Cum dixisset, Non potest Filius a se facere quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem: ne forte carnalis subreperet intellectus, et averteret mentem, et faceret sibi homo quasi duos fabros, unum magistrum, alterum discipulum quasi attendentem ad magistrum, verbi gratia, facientem arcam; ut quomodo ille fecit arcam, faciat et iste alteram arcam secundum visionem quam inspexit in magistro operante: sed ne tale aliquid sibi duplicaret in illa simplici divinitate intellectus carnalis, secutus ait, Quaecumque enim Pater facit, haec eadem et Filius facit similiter. Non facit Pater alia, et alia Filius similia, sed eadem similiter. Non enim ait, Quaecumque facit Pater, facit et Filius alia similia: sed, Quaecumque, inquit, Pater facit, haec eadem et Filius facit similiter. Quae ille, haec et ipse: mundum Pater, mundum Filius, mundum Spiritus sanctus. Si tres dii, tres mundi: si unus Deus Pater et Filius et Spiritus sanctus, unus mundus factus est a Patre per Filium in Spiritu sancto. Haec ergo facit Filius, quae facit et Pater, et non dissimiliter facit: et haec facit, et similiter facit.

20.10 PL 35, 1561

10. After He had said, “these doeth,” why did He add, “in like manner doeth”? Lest another distorted understanding or error should spring up in the mind. Thou seest, for instance, a man’s work: in man there is mind and body; the mind rules the body, but there is a great difference between body and mind: the body is visible, the mind is invisible: there is a great difference between the power and virtue of the mind and that of any kind of body whatever, be it even a heavenly body. Still the mind rules its own body, and the body doeth; and what the mind appears to do, this the body doeth also. Thus the body appears to do this same thing that the mind doeth, but not “in like manner.” How doeth this same, but not in like manner? The mind frames a word in itself; it commands the tongue, and the tongue produces the word which the mind framed: the mind made, and the tongue made; the lord of the body made, and the servant made; but that the servant might make, it received of its lord what to make, and made while the lord commanded. The same thing was made by both, but was it in like manner? How not in like manner? says some one. See, the word that my mind formed, remains in me; that which my tongue made, passed through the smitten air, and is not. When thou hast said a word in thy mind, and uttered it by thy tongue, return to thy mind, and see that the word which thou hast made is there still. Has it remained on thy tongue, just as it has in thy mind? What was uttered by the tongue, the tongue made by sounding, the mind made by thinking; but what the tongue uttered has passed away, what the mind thought remains. Therefore the body made that which the mind made, but not in like manner. For the mind, indeed, made that which the mind may hold, but the tongue made what sounds and strikes the ear through the air. Dost thou chase the syllables, and cause them to remain? Well, not in such manner the Father and the Son; but “these same doeth,” and “in like manner doeth.” If God made heaven that remains, this heaven that remains the Son made. If God the Father made man that is mortal, the same man that is mortal the Son made. What things soever the Father made that endure, these things that endure made also the Son, because in like manner He made; and what things soever the Father made that are temporal, these same things that are temporal made also the Son, because He made not only the same, but also in like manner made. For the Father made by the Son, since by the Word the Father made all things.

Jam dixerat, haec facit; quare addidit, similiter facit? Ne alius pravus intellectus vel error in animo nasceretur. Vides enim hominis opus; animus est in homine et corpus: animus imperat corpori, sed multum interest inter corpus et animum: corpus visibile est, animus invisibilis; inter potentiam virtutemque animi, et cujusvis licet coelestis corporis multum interest. Imperat tamen animus corpori suo, et facit corpus: et quod videtur animus facere, hoc facit et corpus. Videtur ergo corpus hoc idem facere quod animus, sed non similiter. Quomodo hoc idem facit, sed non similiter? Facit animus verbum apud se, jubet linguae, et profert verbum quod fecit animus: fecit animus, fecit et lingua; fecit dominus corporis, fecit et servus: sed ut faceret servus, a domino accepit quod faceret, et jubente domino fecit. Hoc idem ab utroque factum est: sed numquid similiter? Quomodo non similiter, ait aliquis? Ecce verbum quod fecit animus meus, manet in me: quod fecit lingua mea, percusso aere transiit, et non est. Cum dixeris verbum in animo tuo, et sonuerit per linguam tuam, redi ad animum tuum, et vide quia ibi est verbum quod fecisti. Numquid sicut mansit in animo tuo, mansit in lingua tua? Quod sonuit per linguam tuam, fecit lingua sonans, fecit animus cogitans: sed quod sonuit lingua, transiit; quod cogitavit animus, permanet. Hoc ergo fecit corpus, quod fecit animus; sed non similiter. Fecit enim animus quod teneat animus; fecit autem lingua quod sonat, et per aerem aurem verberat. Numquid sequeris syllabas, et facis ut maneant? Non ergo sic Pater et Filius; sed haec eadem facit, et similiter facit. Si fecit Deus coelum quod manet, hoc fecit Filius coelum quod manet. Si fecit Deus Pater hominem qui moritur, eumdem Filius hominem fecit qui moritur. Quaecumque fecit Pater stantia, haec fecit et Filius stantia; quia similiter fecit: et quaecumque fecit Pater temporalia, haec eadem fecit Filius temporalia; quia non solum ipsa fecit, sed et similiter fecit. Pater enim fecit per Filium, quia per Verbum fecit Pater omnia.

20.11 PL 35, 1562

11. Seek in the Father and Son a separation, thou findest none; no, not if thou hast mounted high; no, not even if thou hast reached something above thy mind. For if thou turnest about among the things which thy wandering mind makes for itself, thou talkest with thine own imaginations, not with the Word of God; thine own imaginations deceive thee. Mount also beyond the body, and understand the mind; mount also beyond the mind, and understand God. Thou reachest not unto God, unless thou hast passed beyond the mind; how much less thou reachest unto God, if thou hast tarried in the flesh! They who think of the flesh, how far are they from understanding what God is!—since they would not be there even if they knew the mind. Man recedes far from God when his thoughts are of the flesh; and there is a great difference between flesh and mind, yet a greater between mind and God. If thou art occupied with the mind, thou art in the midway: if thou directest thy attention beneath, there is the body; if above, there is God. Lift thyself up from the body, pass beyond even thyself. For observe what said the psalm, and thou art admonished how God must be thought of: “My tears,” it saith, “were made to me my bread day and night, when it was said to me daily, Where is thy God?” As the pagans may say, “Behold our gods, where is your God?” They indeed show us what is seen; we worship what is not seen. And to whom can we show? To a man who has not sight with which to see? For anyhow, if they see their gods with their eyes, we too have other eyes with which to see our God: for “blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.” Therefore, when he had said that he was troubled, when it was daily said to him, “Where is thy God?” “these things I remembered,” saith he, “because it is daily said to me, Where is thy God?” And as if wishing to lay hold of his God, “These things,” saith he, “I remembered, and poured out my soul above me.” Therefore, that I might reach unto my God, of whom it was said to me, “Where is thy God? I poured out my soul,” not over my flesh, but “above me;” I transcended myself, that I might reach unto Him: for He is above me who made me; none reaches to Him but he that passes beyond himself.

Quaere in Patre et Filio separationem, non invenis: sed si assurrexisti, tunc non invenis; si aliquid supra mentem tuam tetigisti, tunc non invenis. Nam si in his versaris, quae sibi errans animus facit; cum imaginibus tuis loqueris, non cum Verbo Dei: fallunt te imagines tuae. Transcende et corpus, et sape animum: transcende et animum, et sape Deum. Non tangis Deum, nisi et animum transieris: quanto minus tangis, si in carne manseris? Illi ergo qui sapiunt carnem, quam longe sunt a sapiendo quod Deus est? quia non ibi essent, etiam si animum saperent. Recedit homo multum a Deo quando sapit carnaliter, et multum interest inter carnem et animum: plus tamen interest inter animum et Deum. Tu si in animo es, in medio es: si infra attendis, corpus est: si supra attendis, Deus est. Attolle te a corpore, transi etiam te. Vide enim quid dixit Psalmus, et admoneris quemadmodum sapiendus sit Deus: Factae sunt, inquit, mihi lacrymae meae panes die ac nocte, cum dicitur mihi quotidie, Ubi est Deus tuus? Tanquam Pagani dicant: Ecce dii nostri; Deus vester ubi est? Ostendunt enim illi quod videtur; nos colimus quod non videtur. Et cui ostendamus? homini qui non habet unde videat? Nam utique si ipsi deos suos vident oculis; habemus et nos alios oculos, unde videamus Deum nostrum. Ipsi oculi mundandi sunt a Deo nostro, ut videamus Deum nostrum: Beati enim mundo corde, quia ipsi Deum videbunt . Ergo cum se conturbatum dixisset, cum dicitur illi quotidie, Ubi est Deus tuus? Haec memoratus sum, inquit, quia dicitur mihi quotidie, Ubi est Deus tuus? et quasi volens apprehendere Deum suum, Haec memoratus sum, inquit, et effudi super me animam meam . Ut ergo attingerem Deum meum, de quo mihi dicebatur, Ubi est Deus tuus? non effudi animam meam super carnem meam, sed super me: transcendi me, ut illum tangerem. Ille enim est super me, qui fecit me: nemo eum attingit, nisi qui transierit se.

20.12 PL 35, 1562

12. Consider the body: it is mortal, earthy, weak, corruptible; away with it. Yes, perhaps thou sayest, but the body is temporal. Think then of other bodies, the heavenly; they are greater, better, more magnificent. Look at them, moreover, attentively. They roll from east to west, they stand not; they are seen with the eyes, not only by man, but even by the beast of the field. Pass beyond them too. And how, sayest thou, pass beyond the heavenly bodies, seeing that I walk on the earth? Not in the flesh dost thou pass beyond them, but in the mind. Away with them too: though they shine ever so much, they are bodies; though they glitter from heaven, they are bodies. Come, now that perhaps thou thinkest thou hast not whither to go, after considering all these. And whither am I to go, sayest thou, beyond the heavenly bodies; and what am I to pass beyond with the mind? Hast thou considered all these? I have, sayest thou. By what means hast thou considered them? Let the being that considers appear in person. The being that considers all these, that discriminates, distinguishes, and in a manner weighs them in the balance of wisdom, is really the mind. Doubtless, then, better is the mind with which thou hast contemplated all these things, than these things which thou hast contemplated. This mind, then, is a spirit, not a body. Pass beyond it too. And that thou mayest see whither thou art to pass beyond, compare that mind itself, in the first place, with the flesh. Heaven forbid that thou shouldest deign so to compare it! Compare it with the brightness of the sun, of the moon, and of the stars; the brightness of the mind is greater. Observe, first, the swiftness of the mind; see whether the scintillation of the thinking mind be not more impetuous than the brilliance of the shining sun. With the mind thou seest the sun rising. How slow is its motion compared with thy mind! What the sun is about to do, thou canst think in a trice. It is about to come from the east to the west; to-morrow rises from another quarter. Where thy thought has done this, the sun still lags behind, and thou hast traversed the whole journey. A great thing, therefore, is the mind. But how do I say is? Pass beyond it also. For the mind, notwithstanding it be better than every kind of body, is itself changeable. Now it knows, now knows not; now forgets, now remembers; now wills, now wills not; now errs, now is right. Pass therefore beyond all changeableness; not only beyond all that is seen, but also beyond all that changes. For thou hast passed beyond the flesh which is seen; beyond heaven, the sun, moon, and stars, which are seen. Pass, too, beyond all that changes. For when thou hadst done with those things that are seen, and hadst come to thy mind, there thou didst find the changeableness of thy mind. Is God at all changeable? Pass then, beyond even thy mind. Pour out thy soul “above thee,” that thou mayest reach unto God, of whom it is said to thee, “Where is thy God?”

Cogita corpus; mortale est, terrenum est, fragile est, corruptibile est: abjice. Sed forte caro temporalis est. Alia corpora cogita, coelestia corpora cogita; majora, meliora, splendida sunt: attende et ipsa, volvuntur ab oriente ad occidentem, non stant; videntur oculis, non solum ab homine, sed etiam a pecore: transi et ipsa. Et quomodo, inquies, transeo coelestia corpora, cum ambulo in terra? Non carne transis, sed mente. Abjice et ipsa: quamvis luceant, corpora sunt; quamvis de coelo fulgeant, corpora sunt. Veni, quoniam forte non te putas habere quo eas, cum consideras ista omnia. Et ultra coelestia corpora quo iturus sum, inquis, et quid mente transiturus sum? Considerasti ista omnia? Consideravi, inquis. Unde considerasti? Ipse considerator appareat. Ipse enim considerator istorum omnium, discriminator, distinctor et quodammodo appensor in libra sapientiae, animus est. Sine dubio melior est animus quo ista omnia cogitasti, quam ista omnia quae cogitasti. Animus ergo iste spiritus est, non corpus: transi et ipsum. Compara ipsum animum primo, ut videas quo transeas; compara illum carni. Absit, ne digneris comparare. Compara illum fulgori solis, lunae, stellarum: major fulgor est animi. Primo celeritatem animi ipsius vide. Vide si non vehementior scintilla est animi cogitantis, quam splendor solis lucentis. Solem orientem tu vides animo: motus ipsius quam tardus est ad animum tuum? Cito tu potuisti cogitare quod facturus est sol. Ab oriente ad occidentem venturus est, jam ex alia parte cras oritur. Ubi hoc fecit cogitatio tua, adhuc ille tardus est, et tu omnia peragrasti. Magna ergo res est animus. Sed quomodo dico, est? Transi et ipsum; quia et ipse animus mutabilis est, quamvis melior sit omni corpore. Modo novit, modo non novit; modo obliviscitur, modo recordatur; modo vult, modo non vult; modo peccat, modo justus est. Transi ergo omnem mutabilitatem; non solum omne quod videtur, sed et omne quod mutatur. Transisti enim carnem quae videtur, transisti coelum, solem, lunam, et stellas quae videntur; transi et omne quod mutatur. Jam enim istis transactis veneras ad animum tuum, sed et ibi invenisti mutabilitatem animi tui. Numquid mutabilis est Deus? Transi ergo et animum tuum. Effunde super te animam tuam, ut contingas Deum, de quo tibi dicitur, Ubi est Deus tuus?

20.13 PL 35, 1563

13. Do not imagine that thou art to do something beyond a man’s ability. The Evangelist John himself did this. He soared beyond the flesh, beyond the earth which he trod, beyond the seas which he looked upon, beyond the air in which the fowls fly, beyond the sun, the moon, the stars, beyond all the spirits unseen, beyond his own mind, by the very reason of his rational soul. Soaring beyond all these, pouring out his soul above him, whither did he arrive? What did he see? “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God.” If, therefore, thou seest no separation in the light, why seekest thou a separation in the work? See God, see His Word inhering to the Word speaking, that the speaker speaks not by syllables, but this his speaking is a shining out in the brightness of wisdom. What is said of the Wisdom itself? “It is the radiance of eternal light.” Observe the radiance of the sun. The sun is in the heaven, and spreads out its brightness over all lands and over all seas, and it is simply a corporal light.

If, indeed, thou canst separate the brightness from the sun, then separate the Word from the Father. I am speaking of the sun. One small, slender flame of a lamp, which can be extinguished by one breath, spreads its light over all that lies near it: thou seest the light generated by the flame spread out; thou seest its emission, but not a separation. Understand, then, beloved brethren, that the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Ghost are inseparably united in themselves; that this Trinity is one God; that all the works of the one God are the works of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. All the rest which follows, and which refers to the discourse of our Lord Jesus Christ, now that a discourse is due to you to-morrow also, be present that ye may hear.

Ne putes te aliquid facturum quod homo non possit. Hoc fecit ipse Joannes evangelista. Transcendit carnem, transcendit terram quam calcabat, transcendit maria quae videbat, transcendit aerem ubi alites volitant, transcendit solem, transcendit lunam, transcendit stellas, transcendit omnes spiritus qui non videntur, transcendit mentem suam ipsa ratione animi sui. Transcendens ista omnia, super se effundens animam suam, quo pervenit? Quid vidit? In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum. Si ergo separationem non vides in luce, quid separationem quaeris in opere? Vide Deum, vide Verbum ejus inhaerere Verbo dicenti: quia ipse dicens non syllabis dicit; sed splendore sapientiae fulgere, hoc est dicere. Quid dictum est de Sapientia ipsius? Candor est lucis aeternae . Attende candorem solis. In coelo est, et expandit candorem per terras omnes, per maria omnia: et utique corporalis lux est. Si separas candorem solis a sole, separa Verbum a Patre. De sole loquor. Lucernae una flammula tenuis, quae uno flatu possit exstingui, spargit lucem suam super cuncta quae subjacent. Vides lucem sparsam a flammula generatam, emissionem vides, separationem non vides. Intelligite ergo, fratres charissimi, Patrem et Filium et Spiritum sanctum inseparabiliter sibi cohaerere, Trinitatem hanc unum Deum; et omnia opera unius Dei, haec esse Patris, haec esse Filii, haec esse Spiritus sancti. Caetera quae consequuntur, quae pertinent ad sermonem ipsius Domini nostri Jesu Christi in Evangelio, quoniam et erastino die sermo debetur vobis, adestote ut audiatis.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Save for later

Enter your email and we will send you a sign-in link. No password. What you save (articles, verses, chapters, documents) follows you to any device.