Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 38

St Augustine of Hippo (AD 354–430) · In Joannis evangelium tractatus CXXIV · PL 35, 1379–1976

38.1 Chapter VIII. 21–25 PL 35, 1675

1. The lesson of the holy Gospel which preceded to-day’s had concluded thus: that “the Lord spake, teaching in the treasury,” what it pleased Him, and what you have heard; “and no one laid hands on Him, for His hour was not yet come.” Accordingly, on the Lord’s day we made our subject of discourse what He Himself thought fit to give us. We indicated to your Charity why it was said, “His hour was not yet come,” lest any in their impiety should have the effrontery to suspect Christ as laid under some fatal necessity. For the hour was not yet come when by His own appointment, in accordance with what was predicted regarding Him, He should not be forced to die unwillingly, but be ready to be slain.

Lectio sancti Evangelii quae praecessit hodiernam, ita concluserat, quia locutus est docens in gazophylacio Dominus, quae voluit, et quae audistis: et nemo apprehendit eum, quia nondum venerat hora ejus . Hinc disputatum est dominico die, quod ipse donare dignatus est. Intimavimus Charitati vestrae quare dictum sit, Nondum venerat hora ejus; ne positum Christum sub aliqua necessitate fatali ulla impietas auderet improbe suspicari. Nondum enim venerat hora qua ex ordine suo, secundum ea quae praedicta sunt de illo, non mori cogeretur invitus, sed occideretur paratus.

38.2 PL 35, 1676

2. But of His own passion itself, which lay not in any necessity He was under, but in His own power, all that He said in His discourse to the Jews was, “I go away.” For to Christ the Lord’s death was His proceeding to the place whence He had come, and from which He had never departed. “I go away,” said He, “and ye shall seek me,” not from any longing for me, but in hatred. For after His removal from human sight, He was sought for both by those who hated Him and those who loved Him; by the former in a spirit of persecution, by the latter with the desire of having Him. In the Psalms the Lord Himself says by the prophet, “A place of refuge hath failed me, and there is none that seeketh after my life;” and again He says in another place in the Psalms, “Let them be confounded and ashamed who seek after my life.” He blamed the former for not seeking, He condemned the latter because they did. For it is wrong not to seek the life of Christ, that is, in the way the disciples sought it; and it is wrong to seek the life of Christ, that is, in the way the Jews sought it: for the former sought to possess it, these latter to destroy it. Accordingly, because these men sought it thus in a wrong way, with a perverted heart, what next did He add? “Ye shall seek me, and”—not to let you suppose that ye will seek me for good—“ye shall die in your sin.” This comes of seeking Christ wrongly, to die in one’s sin; this of hating Him, through whom alone salvation could be found. For, while men whose hope is in God ought not to render evil even for evil, these men were rendering evil for good. The Lord therefore announced to them beforehand, and in His foreknowledge uttered the sentence, that they should die in their sin. And then He adds, “Whither I go, ye cannot come.” He said the same to the disciples also in another place; and yet He said not to them, “Ye shall die in your sin.” But what did He say? The same as to these men: “Whither I go, ye cannot come.” He did not take away hope, but foretold delay. For at the time when the Lord spake this to the disciples, they were not able to come whither He was going, yet were they to come afterwards; but these men never, to whom in His foreknowledge He said, “Ye shall die in your sin.”

Modo autem de ipsa passione sua, quae posita erat non in ejus necessitate, sed potestate, locutus est Judaeis dicens: Ego vado. Christo enim Domino mors profectio fuit illo unde venerat, et unde non discesserat. Ego, inquit, vado, et quaeretis me: non desiderio, sed odio. Nam illum posteaquam abscessit ab oculis hominum, inquisierunt et qui oderant et qui amabant: illi persequendo, illi habere cupiendo. In Psalmis ait ipse Dominus per prophetam, Periit fuga a me, et non est qui requirat animam meam : et iterum ait alio loco in Psalmo, Confundantur et revereantur requirentes animam meam . Culpavit qui non requirerent, damnavit qui requirerent. Malum est enim non quaerere animam Christi, sed quomodo eam quaesierunt discipuli; et malum est quaerere animam Christi, sed quomodo eam Judaei quaesierunt: illi enim ut haberent, isti ut perderent. Denique isti quia sic quaerebant more malo, corde perverso, quid secutus adjunxit? Quaeretis me, et, ne putetis quia bene me quaeretis, in peccato vestro moriemini. Hoc est Christum male quaerere, in peccato suo mori: hoc est illum odisse, per quem posset solum salvus esse. Cum enim homines quorum spes in Deo est, non debeant mala reddere nec pro malis, reddebant isti mala pro bonis. Praenuntiavit ergo illis Dominus, dixitque sententiam praescius, quod in suo peccato morerentur. Deinde adjungit: Quo ego vado, vos non potestis venire. Hoc et discipulis alio loco dixit; nec tamen eis dixit, In peccato vestro moriemini. Quid autem dixit? Quod et istis: Quo ego vado, vos venire non potestis . Non abstulit spem, sed praedixit dilationem. Quando enim hoc discipulis Dominus loquebatur, tunc non poterant venire quo ille ibat, sed postea venturi erant: isti autem nunquam, quibus praescius dixit, In peccato vestro moriemini.

38.3 PL 35, 1676

3. But on hearing these words, as is usual with those whose thoughts are carnal, who judge after the flesh, and hear and apprehend everything in a carnal way, they said, “Will he kill himself because he said, Whither I go ye cannot come.” Foolish words, and overflowing with stupidity! For why could they not go whither He would have proceeded had He killed Himself? Were not they themselves to die? What, then, means, “Will he kill himself because he said, Whither I go ye cannot come?” If He spake of man’s death, what man is there that does not die? Therefore, by “whither I go” He meant, not the going to death, but whither He was going Himself after death. Such, then, was their answer, because they did not understand.

His autem auditis verbis, quomodo solent carnea cogitantes, et secundum carnem judicantes, et totum carnaliter audientes atque sapientes, dixerunt: Numquid interficiet semetipsum; quia dixit, Quo ego vado, vos non potestis venire? Stulta verba, et omnino insipientiae plena. Quid enim? non poterant illo venire quo ille perrexisset, si interficeret semetipsum? Numquid ipsi non erant morituri? Quid est ergo, Numquid interficiet semetipsum; quia dixit, Quo ego vado, vos non potestis venire? Si de morte hominis diceret, quis homo non moritur? Ergo quo ego vado dixit, non cum itur ad mortem, sed quo ibat ipse post mortem. Illi itaque non intelligentes, ista responderunt.

38.4 PL 35, 1676

4. And what said the Lord to those who savored of the earth? “And He said unto them, Ye are from beneath.” For this cause ye savor of the earth, because ye lick dust like serpents. Ye eat earth! What does it mean? Ye feed on earthly things, ye delight in earthly things, ye gape after earthly things, ye have no heart for what is above. “Ye are from beneath: I am from above. Ye are of this world: I am not of this world.” For how could He be of the world, by whom the world was made? All that are of the world come after the world, because the world preceded; and so man is of the world. But Christ was first, and then the world; and since Christ was before the world, before Christ there was nothing: because “In the beginning was the Word; all things were made by Him.” He, therefore, was of that which is above. But of what that is above? Of the air? Perish the thought! there the birds wing their flight. Of the sky that we see? Again I say, Perish the thought! it is there that the stars and sun and moon revolve. Of the angels? Neither is this to be understood: by Him who made all things were the angels also made. Of what, then, above is Christ? Of the Father Himself. Nothing is above that God who begat the Word equal with Himself, co-eternal with Himself, only-begotten, timeless, that by Him time’s own foundations should be laid. Understand, then, Christ as from above, so as in thy thought to get beyond everything that is made,—the whole creation together, every material body, every created spirit, everything in any way subject to change: rise above all, as John rose, in order to reach this: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”

Et Dominus ad eos qui terram sapiebant, quid ait? Et dicebat eis: Vos de deorsum estis. Ideo terram sapitis, quia sicut serpentes terram manducatis. Quid est, terram manducatis? Terrenis pascimini, terrenis delectamini, terrenis inhiatis, sursum cor non habetis. Vos de deorsum estis: ego de supernis sum. Vos de mundo hoc estis: ego non sum de hoc mundo. Quomodo enim erat de mundo, per quem factus est mundus? Omnes de mundo post mundum; quia prius mundus, et sic homo de mundo: prius autem Christus, deinde mundus; quoniam ante mundum Christus, ante Christum nihil: quia in principio erat Verbum; omnia per ipsum facta sunt . Sic ergo erat ille de supernis. De quibus supernis? De aere? Absit: ibi et aves volitant. De coelo quod videmus? Et hoc absit; ibi et stellae et sol et luna circumeunt. De Angelis? Neque hoc intelligatis: per illum et Angeli facti sunt, per quem omnia facta sunt. De quibus ergo supernis Christus? Ab ipso Patre. Nihil illo Deo superius, qui Verbum genuit aequale sibi, coaeternum sibi, unigenitum, sine tempore, per quem conderet tempora. Sic ergo accipe Christum de supernis, ut excedas cogitatione tua omne quod factum est; universam omnino creaturam, omne corpus, omnem conditum spiritum, omnem rem quoquo modo mutabilem: totum excede, sicut excessit Joannes, ut contingeret, In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum.

38.5 PL 35, 1677

5. Therefore said He, “I am from above. Ye are of this world: I am not of this world. I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins.” He has explained to us, brethren, what He wished to be understood by “ye are of this world.” He said therefore in fact, “Ye are of this world,” because they were sinners, because they were unrighteous, because they were unbelieving, because they savored of the earthly. For what is your opinion as regards the holy apostles? What difference was there between the Jews and the apostles? As great as between darkness and light, as between faith and unbelief, as between piety and impiety, as between hope and despair, as between love and avarice: surely the difference was great. What then, because there was such a difference, were the apostles not of the world? If thy thoughts turn to the manner of their birth, and whence they came, inasmuch as all of them had come from Adam, they were of this world. But what said the Lord Himself to them? “I have chosen you out of the world.” Those, then, who were of the world, became not of the world, and began to belong to Him by whom the world was made. But these men continued to be of the world, to whom it was said, “Ye shall die in your sins.”

Ego ergo, inquit, de supernis sum. Vos de hoc mundo estis: ego non sum de hoc mundo. Dixi ergo vobis quia moriemini in peccatis vestris. Exposuit nobis, fratres, quid intelligi voluerit, Vos de hoc mundo estis. Ideo quippe dixit, Vos de hoc mundo estis, quia peccatores erant, quia iniqui erant, quia infideles erant, quia terrena sapiebant. Nam quid vobis videtur de sanctis Apostolis? Quantum intererat inter Judaeos et Apostolos? Quantum inter tenebras et lucem, quantum inter fidem et infidelitatem, quantum inter pietatem et impietatem, quantum inter spem et desperationem, quantum inter charitatem et cupiditatem: multum ergo intererat. Quid ergo? quia tantum intererat, Apostoli de mundo non erant? Si cogites quomodo nati sint, et unde venerint; quia omnes ex Adam venerant, de hoc mundo erant. Sed quid eis ait ipse Dominus? Ego vos de mundo elegi . Qui ergo de mundo erant, facti sunt non de mundo, et pertinere coeperunt ad eum per quem factus est mundus. Isti autem remanserunt esse de mundo, quibus dictum est, Moriemini in peccatis vestris.

38.6 PL 35, 1677

6. Let none then, brethren, say, I am not of this world. Whoever thou art as a man, thou art of this world; but He who made the world came to thee, and delivered thee from this world. If the world delights thee, thou wishest always to be unclean (immundus); but if this world no longer delight thee, thou art already clean (mundus). And yet, if through some infirmity the world still delight thee, let Him who cleanseth (mundat) dwell in thee, and thou too shalt be clean. But if thou art once clean, thou wilt not continue in the world; neither wilt thou hear what was heard by the Jews, “Ye shall die in your sins.” For we are all born with sin; we have all in living added to that wherein we were born, and have since become more of the world than when we were born of our parents. And where should we be, had He not come, who was wholly free from sin, to expiate all sin? And so, because in Him the Jews believed not, they deservedly heard [the sentence], “Ye shall die in your sins;” for in no way could ye, who were born with sin, be without sin; and yet, said He, if ye believe in me, although it is still true that ye were born with sin, yet in your sin ye shall not die. The whole misery, then, of the Jews was just this, not to have sin, but to die in their sins. From this it is that every Christian ought to seek to escape; because of this we have recourse to baptism; on this account do those whose lives are in danger from sickness or any other cause become anxious for help; for this also is the sucking child carried by his mother with pious hands to the church, that he may not go out into the world without baptism, and die in the sin wherein he was born. Most wretched surely the condition and miserable the lot of these men, who heard from those truth-speaking lips, “Ye shall die in your sins!”

Nemo ergo dicat, fratres, De hoc mundo non sum. Quisquis es homo, de hoc mundo es: sed venit ad te qui fecit mundum, et liberavit te de hoc mundo. Si delectat te mundus, semper vis esse immundus; si autem jam non te delectat hic mundus, jam tu es mundus. Verumtamen si per aliquam infirmitatem adhuc te delectat mundus, habitet in te qui mundat, et eris mundus. Si autem fueris mundus, non remanebis in mundo; nec audies quod audierunt Judaei, Moriemini in peccatis vestris. Omnes enim cum peccato nati sumus; omnes vivendo ad id quod nati eramus addidimus, magisque de mundo facti sumus, quam tunc quando de parentibus nostris nati sumus. Et ubi essemus, si ille non veniret, qui non habebat omnino peccatum, ut solveret omne peccatum? In quem Judaei quia non credebant, merito audierunt, Moriemini in peccatis vestris: quia non habere peccatum nullo modo potuistis, qui eum peccato nati estis, sed tamen si in me, inquit, credideritis, cum peccato quidem nati estis, sed in peccato vestro morituri non estis. Tota ergo infelicitas Judaeorum ipsa erat, non, peccatum habere, sed in peccatis mori. Hoc est quod debet fugere omnis christianus: propter hoc ad Baptismum curritur; propter hoc qui aegritudine vel aliunde periclitantur, sibi desiderant subveniri; propter hoc etiam sugens parvulus a matre piis manibus ad Ecclesiam fertur, ne sine Baptismo exeat, et in peccato quo natus est moriatur. Infelicissima conditio, misera sors istorum, qui de ore veridico audierunt, In peccatis vestris moriemini.

38.7 PL 35, 1678

7. But He explains whence this should befall them: “For if ye believe not that I am [He], ye shall die in your sins.” I believe, brethren, that among the multitude who listened to the Lord, there were those also who should yet believe. But against all, as it were, had that most severe sentence gone forth, “Ye shall die in your sin;” and thereby even from those who should yet believe had hope been withdrawn: the others were roused to fury, they to fear; yea, to more than fear, they were brought now to despair. But He revived their hope; for He added, “If ye believe not that I am, ye shall die in your sins.” Therefore if ye do believe that I am, ye shall not die in your sins. Hope was restored to the desponding, the sleeping were aroused, their hearts got a fresh awakening; and thereafter very many believed, as the Gospel itself attests in the sequel. For members of Christ were there, who had not yet become attached to the body of Christ; and among that people by whom He was crucified, by whom He was hanged on a tree, by whom when hanging He was mocked, by whom He was wounded with the spear, by whom gall and vinegar were given Him to drink, were the members of Christ, for whose sake He said, “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” And what will a convert not be forgiven, if the shedding of Christ’s blood is forgiven? What murderer need despair, if he was restored to hope by whom even Christ was slain? After this many believed; they were presented with Christ’s blood as a gift, that they might drink it for their salvation, rather than be held guilty of shedding it. Who can despair? And if the thief was saved on the cross,—a murderer shortly before, a little afterwards accused, convicted, condemned, hanged, delivered,—wonder not. The place of his conviction was that of his condemnation; while that of his conversion was the place also of his deliverance. Among this people, then, to whom the Lord was speaking, were those who should yet die in their sin: there were those also who should yet believe on Him who spake, and find deliverance from all their sin.

Unde tamen hoc eis contingat, exponit: Si enim non credideritis quia ego sum, moriemini in peccatis vestris. Credo, fratres, in illa multitudine quae Dominum audiebat, et eos fuisse qui credituri erant. Quasi autem in omnes processerat severissima illa sententia, In peccato vestro moriemini; ac per hoc et illis qui credituri erant, spes erat ablata: illi saeviebant, illi timebant; imo non timebant, sed jam desperabant. Revocavit eos in spem; adjunxit enim, Si non credideritis quia ego sum, moriemini in peccatis vestris. Ergo si credideritis quia ego sum, non moriemini in peccatis vestris. Reddita est spes desperantibus, excitatio facta est dormientibus, cordibus evigilaverunt: inde plurimi crediderunt, sicut Evangelii ipsius consequentia testantur. Erant enim illic membra Christi, quae nondum adhaeserant corpori Christi: et in illo populo a quo crucifixus est, a quo in ligno suspensus est, a quo pendens irrisus est, a quo lancea vulneratus est, a quo felle et aceto potatus est, erant membra Christi, pro quibus dixit, Pater, ignosce illis, quia nesciunt quid faciunt. Quid autem converso non ignoscitur, si fusus Christi sanguis ignoscitur? Quis homicida desperet, si in spem redditus est a quo etiam Christus occisus est? Crediderunt inde multi; donatus est eis sanguis Christi, ut magis eum biberent quo liberarentur, quam rei de illo effuso tenerentur: quis desperet? Et si in cruce latro salvatus est, ante paululum homicida, post paululum accusatus, convictus, damnatus, suspensus, liberatus; noli mirari. Ubi convictus, ibi damnatus: sed ibi liberatus, ubi mutatus . In hoc ergo populo cui Dominus loquebatur, erant qui in peccato suo fuerant morituri: erant etiam qui in ipsum qui loquebatur, fuerant credituri, et ab omni peccato liberandi.

38.8 PL 35, 1678

8. But look at this which is said by Christ the Lord: “If ye believe not that I am, ye shall die in your sins.” What is this, “If ye believe not that I am?” “I am” what? There is nothing added; and because He added nothing, He left much to be inferred. For He was expected to say what He was, and yet He said it not. What was He expected to say? Perhaps, “If ye believe not that I am” Christ; “if ye believe not that I am” the Son of God; “if ye believe not that I am” the Word of the Father; “if ye believe not that I am” the founder of the world; “if ye believe not that I am” the former and re-former, the creator and re-creator, the maker and re-maker of man;—“if ye believe not that I am” this, “ye shall die in your sins.” There is much implied in His only saying “I am;” for so also had God said to Moses, “I am who am.” Who can adequately express what that am means? God by His angel sent His servant Moses to deliver His people out of Egypt (you have read and know what you now hear; but I recall it to your minds); He sent him trembling, self-excusing, but obedient. And while thus excusing himself, he said to God, whom he understood to be speaking in the person of the angel: If the people say to me, And who is the God that hath sent thee? what shall I say to them? And the Lord answered him, “I am who am;” and added, “Thou shalt say to the children of Israel, He who is hath sent me to you.” There also He says not, I am God; or, I am the framer of the world; or, I am the creator of all things; or, I am the multiplier of the very people to be delivered: but only this, “I am who am;” and, “Thou shall say to the children of Israel, He who is.” He added not, Who is your God, who is the God of your fathers; but said only this: “He who is hath sent me to you.” Perhaps it was too much even for Moses himself, as it is too much for us also, and much more so for us, to understand the meaning of such words, “I am who am;” and, “He who is hath sent me to you.” And supposing that Moses comprehended it, when would those to whom he was sent comprehend it? The Lord therefore put aside what man could not comprehend, and added what he could; for He said also besides, “I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.” This thou canst comprehend; for “I am who am,” what mind can comprehend?

Tamen hoc attende quod ait Dominus Christus: Si non credideritis quia ego sum, moriemini in peccatis vestris. Quid est, Si non credideritis quia ego sum? Ego sum, quid? Nihil addidit; et quia nihil addidit, multum est quod commendavit. Exspectabatur enim ut diceret quid esset, nec tamen dixit. Quid exspectabatur ut diceret? Forte, Nisi credideritis quia ego sum Christus; nisi credideritis quia ego sum Dei Filius; nisi credideritis quia ego sum Verbum Patris; nisi credideritis quia ego sum conditor mundi; nisi credideritis quia ego sum hominis formator et reformator, creator et recreator, factor et refactor: nisi hoc credideritis quia ego sum, moriemini in peccatis vestris. Multum est quod ait ipsum, Ego sum: quia sic dixerat et Deus Moysi, Ego sum qui sum. Quis digne eloquatur quid sit, sum? Mittebat Deus per angelum suum, servum suum Moysen ad liberandum ex Aegypto populum suum (legistis quod audistis, et nostis; commemoro tamen); mittebat trementem; excusantem, sed obedientem. Cum ergo excusaret, ait Deo, quem loqui in angelo intelligebat: Si dixerit mihi populus, Et quis est Deus qui misit te, quid eis dicam? Et Dominus ad eum, Ego sum qui sum: et repetivit, Dices filiis Israel, Qui est, misit me ad vos. Non ait et ibi, Ego sum Deus; aut, Ego sum mundi fabricator; aut, Ego sum omnium rerum creator; aut, Ego sum ipsius populi liberandi propagator: sed hoc tantum, Ego sum qui sum; et, Dices filiis Israel, Qui est; non addidit, Qui est Deus vester, qui est Deus patrum vestrorum, sed tantum hoc dixit, Qui est, misit me ad vos. Forte multum erat et ad ipsum Moysen, sicut multum est et ad nos, et multo magis ad nos, intelligere quid dictum sit, Ego sum qui sum; et, Qui est, misit me ad vos. Et si forte caperet Moyses, illi ad quos mittebatur quando caperent? Distulit ergo Dominus quod capere homo non posset, et addidit quod capere posset: adjunxit enim et ait, Ego sum Deus Abraham, et Deus Isaac, et Deus Jacob . Hoc potes capere: Nam Ego sum qui sum, quae mens potest capere?

38.9 PL 35, 1679

9. What then of us? Shall we venture to say anything on such words, “I am who am;” or rather on this, that you have heard the Lord saying, “If ye believe not that I am, ye shall die in your sins”? Shall I venture with these feeble and scarcely existing powers of mine to discuss the meaning of that which Christ the Lord hath said, “If ye believe not that I am”? I shall venture to ask the Lord Himself. Listen to me as one asking rather than discussing, inquiring rather than assuming, learning rather than teaching, and fail not yourselves also to be asking with me or through me. The Lord Himself, who is everywhere, is also at hand. Let Him hear the feeling that prompts to ask, and grant the fruit of understanding. For in what words, even were it so that I comprehend something, can I convey to your hearts what I comprehend? What voice is adequate? what eloquence sufficient? what powers of intelligence? what faculty of utterance?

Quid ergo nos? audebimusne aliquid dicere ex hoc quod dictum est, Ego sum qui sum: vel potius ex hoc quod Dominum dicere audistis, Nisi credideritis quia ego sum, moriemini in peccatis vestris? Itane his viribus meis tantillis et pene nullis, audebo disputare quid sit quod ait Dominus Christus, Nisi credideritis quia ego sum? Audebo ipsum Dominum interrogare: audite me interrogantem potius quam disputantem, magis quaerentem quam praesumentem, potius discentem quam docentem, et certe in me vel per me etiam vos interrogate. Praesto est etiam ipse Dominus qui ubique est, audiat interrogandi affectum, et intelligendi praestet effectum. Nam ego quibus verbis, et si forte aliquid capio, perducere possum quod capio ad corda vestra? Quisnam sufficit sonus? quae suppetit eloquentia? quae vires intelligendi? quae facultas proferendi?

38.10 PL 35, 1679

10. I shall speak, then, to our Lord Jesus Christ; I shall speak and may He be pleased to hear me. I believe He is present, I am fully assured of it; for He Himself has said, “Lo, I am with you even to the end of the world.” O Lord our God, what is that which Thou saidst, “If ye believe not that I am”? For what is there that belongs not to the things Thou hast made? Does not heaven so belong? Does not the earth? Does not everything in earth and heaven? Does not man himself to whom Thou speakest? Does not the angel whom Thou sendest? If all these are things made by Thee, what is that existence Thou hast retained as something exclusively Thine own, which Thou hast given to none besides, that Thou mightest be such Thyself alone? For how do I hear “I am who am,” as if there were none besides? and how do I hear “If ye believe not that I am”? For had they no existence who heard Him? Yea, though they were sinners, they were men. What then can I do? What that existence is, let Him tell my heart, let Him tell, let Him declare it within; let the inner man hear, the mind apprehend this true existence; for such existence is always unvarying in character. For a thing, anything whatever (I have begun as it were to dispute, and have left off inquiring. Perhaps I wish to speak what I have heard. May He grant enlargement to my hearing, and to yours, while I speak);—for anything, whatever in short be its excellence, if it is changeable, does not truly exist; for there is no true existence wherever non-existence has also a place. For whatever can be changed, so far as changed, it is not that which was: if it is no longer what it was, a kind of death has therein taken place; something that was there has been eliminated, and exists no more. Blackness has died out in the silvery locks of the patriarch, comeliness in the body of the careworn and crooked old man, strength in the body of the languishing, the [previous] standing posture in the body of one walking, walking in the body of one standing, walking and standing in the body of one reclining, speech in the tongue of the silent;—whatever changes, and is what it was not, I see there a kind of life in that which is, and death in that which was. In fine, when we say of one deceased, Where is that person? we are answered, He was. O Truth, it is thou [alone] that truly art! For in all actions and movements of ours, yea, in every activity of the creature, I find two times, the past and the future. I seek for the present, nothing stands still: what I have said is no longer present; what I am going to say is not yet come: what I have done is no longer present; what I am going to do is not yet come: the life I have lived is no longer present; the life I have still to live is not yet come. Past and future I find in every creature-movement: in truth, which is abiding, past and future I find not, but the present alone, and that unchangeably, which has no place in the creature. Sift the mutations of things, thou wilt find was and will be: think on God, thou wilt find the is, where was and will be cannot exist. To be so then thyself, rise beyond the boundaries of time. But who can transcend the powers of his being? May He raise us thither who said to the Father, “I will that they also be with me where I am.” And so, in making this promise, that we should not die in our sins, the Lord Jesus Christ, I think, said nothing else by these words, “If ye believe not that I am;” yea, by these words I think He meant nothing else than this, “If ye believe not that I am” God, “ye shall die in your sins.” Well, God be thanked that He said, “If ye believe not,” and did not say, If ye comprehend not. For who can comprehend this? Or is it so, since I have ventured to speak and you have seemed to understand, that you have indeed comprehended somewhat of a subject so unspeakable? If then thou comprehendest not, faith sets thee free. Therefore also the Lord said not, If ye comprehend not that I am; but said what they were capable of attaining, “If ye believe not that I am, ye shall die in your sins.”

Dicam ergo Domino nostro Jesu Christo, dicam, et audiat me. Credo praesentem, omnino non dubito; ipse enim dixit, Ecce ego vobiscum sum usque in consummationem saeculi . O Domine Deus noster, quid est quod aisti, Nisi credideritis quia ego sum? Quid enim non est eorum quae fecisti? Numquid coelum non est? numquid terra non est? numquid non sunt ea quae in terra et in coelo sunt? numquid homo ipse cui loqueris non est? numquid angelus quem mittis non est? Si omnia sunt haec quae per te facta sunt, quid est quod tibi proprium quiddam tenuisti ipsum esse, quod aliis non dedisti, ut tu solus esses? Nam quomodo audio, Ego sum qui sum; quasi alia non sint? et quomodo audio, Nisi credideritis quia ego sum? Illi enim non erant qui audiebant? Et si peccatores erant, homines erant. Quid ergo facio? Quid sit ipsum esse, dicat cordi, intus dicat, intus loquatur; homo interior audiat, mens capiat vere esse: est enim semper eodem modo esse. (Res enim aliqua, quaelibet omnino: quasi coepi disputare, et destiti quaerere; forte quod audivi volo loqui, auditui meo det exsultationem et vestro cum loquor): res enim quaelibet, prorsus qualicumque excellentia, si mutabilis est, non vere est; non enim est ibi verum esse, ubi est et non esse. Quidquid enim mutari potest, mutatum non est quod erat: si non est quod erat, mors quaedam ibi facta est; peremptum est aliquid ibi quod erat, et non est. Nigredo mortua est in capite albescentis senis, pulchritudo mortua est in corpore fessi et incurvi senis, mortuae sunt vires in corpore languentis, mortua est statio in corpore ambulantis, mortua est ambulatio in corpore stantis, mortua est ambulatio et statio in corpore jacentis, mortua est locutio in lingua tacentis: quidquid mutatur et est quod non erat, video ibi quamdam vitam in eo quod est, et mortem in eo quod fuit. Denique de mortuo cum dicitur, Ubi est homo ille? respondetur, Fuit. O veritas quae vere es! Nam in omnibus actionibus et motibus nostris, et in omni prorsus agitatione creaturae duo tempora invenio, praeteritum et futurum. Praesens quaero, nihil stat: quod dixi, jam non est; quod dicturus sum, nondum est: quod feci, jam non est; quod facturus sum, nondum est: quod vixi, jam non est; quod victurus sum, nondum est. Praeteritum et futurum invenio in omni motu rerum: in veritate quae manet, praeteritum et futurum non invenio, sed solum praesens, et hoc incorruptibiliter, quod in creatura non est. Discute rerum mutationes, invenies Fuit et Erit: cogita Deum, invenies Est, ubi Fuit et Erit esse non possit. Ut ergo et tu sis, transcende tempus. Sed quis transcendet viribus suis? Levet illuc ille qui Patri dixit, Volo ut ubi ego sum, et ipsi sint mecum. Hoc itaque promittens ne moriamur in peccatis nostris, nihil aliud Dominus Jesus Christus mihi videtur his verbis dixisse, Nisi credideritis quia ego sum: prorsus nihil aliud mihi videtur his verbis dixisse quam hoc, Nisi credideritis quia ego Deus sum, moriemini in peccatis vestris. Bene, Deo gratias, quia dixit, Nisi credideritis: non dixit, Nisi ceperitis. Quis enim hoc capiat? Aut vere, quia ausus sum dicere, et visi estis intelligere, aliquid de tanta ineffabilitate cepistis? Si ergo non capis, fides te liberat. Ideo et Dominus non ait, Nisi ceperitis quia ego sum; sed quod poterant dixit, Nisi credideritis quia ego sum, moriemini in peccatis vestris.

38.11 PL 35, 1681

11. And savoring as these men always did of the earth, and ever hearing and answering according to the flesh, what did they say to Him? “Who art thou?” For when thou saidst, “If ye believe not that I am,” thou didst not tell us what thou wert. Who art thou, that we may believe? He answered “The Beginning.” Here is the existence that [always] is. The beginning cannot be changed: the beginning is self-abiding and all-originating; that is, the beginning, to which it has been said, “But thou Thyself art the same, and Thy years shall not fail.” “The beginning,” He said, “for so I also speak to you.” Believe me [to be] the beginning, that ye may not die in your sins. For just as if by saying, “Who art thou?” they had said nothing else than this, What shall we believe thee to be? He replied, “The beginning;” that is, Believe me [to be] the “beginning.” For in the Greek expression we discern what we cannot in the Latin. For in Greek the word “beginning” (principium, ἀρχή), is of the feminine gender, just as with us “law” (lex) is of the feminine gender, while it is of the masculine (νόμος) with them; or as “wisdom” (sapientia, σοφία) is of the feminine gender with both. It is the custom of speech, therefore, in different languages to vary the gender of words, because in things themselves there is no place for the distinction of sex. For wisdom is not really female, since Christ is the Wisdom of God, and Christ is termed of the masculine gender, wisdom of the feminine. When then the Jews said, “Who art thou?” He, who knew that there were some there who should yet believe, and therefore had said, Who art thou? that so they might come to know what they ought to believe regarding Him, replied, “The beginning:” not as if He said, I am the beginning; but as if He said, Believe me [to be] the beginning. Which, as I said, is quite evident in the Greek language, where beginning (ἀρχή) is of the feminine gender. Just as if He had wished to say that He was the Truth, and to their question, “Who art thou?” had answered, Veritatem[the Truth]; when to the words, “Who art thou?” He evidently ought to have replied, Veritas [the Truth]; that is, I am the Truth. But His answer had a deeper meaning, when He saw that they had put the question, “Who art thou?” in such a way as to mean, Having heard from thee, “If ye believe not that I am,” what shall we believe thee to be? To this He replied, “The beginning:” as if He said, Believe me to be the beginning. And He added “for [as such] I also speak to you;” that is, having humbled myself on your account, I have condescended to such words. For if the beginning as it is in itself had remained so with the Father, as not to receive the form of a servant and speak as man with men; how could they have believed in Him, since their weak hearts could not have heard the Word intelligently without some voice that would appeal to their senses? Therefore, said He, believe me to be the beginning; for, that you may believe, I not only am, but also speak to you. But on this subject I have still much to say to you; may it therefore please your Charity that we reserve what remains, and by His gracious aid deliver it tomorrow.

Et illi semper terrena sapientes et semper secundum carnem audientes et respondentes, quid ei dixerunt? Tu quis es? Non enim cum dixisti, Nisi credideritis quia ego sum, addidisti quid esses. Quis es, ut credamus? Et ille, Principium. Ecce quod est esse. Principium mutari non potest: principium in se manet, et innovat omnia; principium est, cui dictum est, Tu autem idem ipse es, et anni tui non deficient . Principium, ait, quia et loquor vobis. Principium me credite, ne moriamini in peccatis vestris. Tanquam enim in eo quod dixerunt, Tu quis es? nihil aliud dixerint quam, Quid te esse credimus? respondit, Principium; id est, Principium me credite. In graeco namque eloquio discernitur, quod non potest in latino. Apud graecos enim femini generis est principium, sicut apud nos lex generis feminini est, quae apud illos est masculini: sicut sapientia et apud nos et apud illos generis feminini est. Consuetudo locutionis ideo per diversas linguas variat genera vocabulorum, quia in ipsis rebus non invenis sexum. Non enim sapientia vere femina est, cum Christus sit Dei Sapientia , et Christus appelletur genere masculino, sapientia feminino. Cum ergo dicerent Judaei, Tu quis es? ille qui sciebat esse ibi quosdam credituros, et ideo dixisse, Tu quis es? ut scirent quid illum credere deberent, respondit, Principium: non tanquam diceret, Principium sum; sed tanquam diceret, Principium me credite. Quod in sermone graeco, ut dixi, evidenter apparet, ubi feminini generis est principium. Velut si vellet dicere se esse veritatem, et dicentibus, Tu quis es? responderet, Veritatem; cum videatur ad id quod dictum est, Tu quis es? respondere debuisse, Veritas; id est, Veritas sum. Sed altius respondit, cum videret eos ita dixisse, Tu quis es? ac si dicerent, Quoniam abs te audivimus, Nisi credideritis quia ego sum, quid te esse credemus? ad hoc respondit, Principium: tanquam diceret, Principium me credite. Et addidit, quia et loquor vobis: id est, quia humilis propter vos factus, ad ista verba descendi. Nam si principium sicuti est, ita maneret apud Patrem, ut non acciperet formam servi et homo loqueretur hominibus; quomodo ei crederent, cum infirma corda intelligibile Verbum sine voce sensibili audire non possent? Ergo, inquit, credite me esse principium; quia, ut credatis, non solum sum, sed et loquor vobis. Sed de hac re jam multum est loqui vobis: placeat itaque Charitati vestrae ut quod restat, illo adjuvante servemus, crastino reddituri.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Save for later

Enter your email and we will send you a sign-in link. No password. What you save (articles, verses, chapters, documents) follows you to any device.