Ten Homilies on the First Epistle of John 7
7.0 1 John IV. 4–12 PL 35, 2029
“Now are ye of God, little children, and have overcome him: because greater is He that is in you, than he that is in this world. They are of the world: therefore speak they of the world, and the world heareth them. We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us. From this know we the spirit of truth, and [the spirit] of error. Dearly, beloved, let us love one another: for love is of God; and every one that loveth is born of God, and knoweth God. He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love. In this was manifested the love of God in us, that God sent His only-begotten Son into this world, that we may live through Him. Herein is love, not that we loved, but that He loved us, and sent His Son to be the Atoner for our sins. Dearly beloved, if God so loved us, we ought also to love one another. No man hath seen God at any time.”
7.1 1 John IV. 4–12 PL 35, 2029
1. So is this world to all the faithful seeking their own country, as was the desert to the people Israel. They wandered indeed as yet, and were seeking their own country: but with God for their guide they could not wander astray. Their way was God’s bidding. For where they went about during forty years, the journey itself is made up of a very few stations, and is known to all. They were retarded because they were in training, not because they were forsaken. That therefore which God promiseth us is ineffable sweetness and a good, as the Scripture saith, and as ye have often heard by us rehearsed, which “eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither hath entered into the heart of man.” But by temporal labors we are exercised, and by temptations of this present life are trained. Howbeit, if ye would not die of thirst in this wilderness, drink charity. It is the fountain which God has been pleased to place here that we faint not in the way: and we shall more abundantly drink thereof, when we are come to our own land. The Gospel has just been read; now to speak of the very words with which the lesson ended, what other thing heard ye but concerning charity? For we have made an agreement with our God in prayer, that if we would that He should forgive us our sins, we also should forgive the sins which may have been committed against us. Now that which forgiveth is none other than charity. Take away charity from the heart; hatred possesseth it, it knows not how to forgive. Let charity be there, and she fearlessly forgiveth, not being straitened. And this whole epistle which we have undertaken to expound to you, see whether it commendeth aught else than this one thing, charity. Nor need we fear lest by much speaking thereof it come to be hateful. For what is there to love, if charity come to be hateful? It is by charity that other things come to be rightly loved; then how must itself be loved! Let not that then which ought never to depart from the heart, depart from the tongue.
Mundus iste omnibus fidelibus quaerentibus patriam sic est, quomodo fuit eremus populo Israel. Errabant quidem adhuc, et patriam quaerebant: sed duce Deo errare non poterant. Via illis fuit jussio Dei. Nam ubi per quadraginta annos circumierunt, paucissimis mansionibus conficitur iter ipsum, et notum est omnibus. Tardabantur, quia exercebantur, non quia deserebantur. Quod ergo nobis promittit Deus, ineffabilis dulcedo est, et bonum, sicut Scriptura dicit, et saepe nobis commemorantibus audistis, quod oculus non vidit, nec auris audivit, nec in cor hominis ascendit . Laboribus autem temporalibus exercemur, et tentationibus vitae praesentis erudimur. Sed si non vultis in ista eremo siti mori, bibite charitatem. Fons est quem voluit Dominus hic ponere, ne deficiamus in via: et abundantius eum bibemus, cum ad patriam venerimus. Modo Evangelium lectum est; ut de ipsis verbis, quibus lectio terminata est dicam, quid aliud nisi de charitate audistis? Quandoquidem pactum fecimus cum Deo nostro in oratione, ut si volumus ut dimittat nobis peccata nostra, dimittamus et nos peccata quae in nos fuerint commissa . Non autem dimittit nisi charitas. Tolle charitatem de corde; odium tenet, ignoscere non novit. Sit ibi charitas, secura ignoscit, quae non angustatur. Epistola autem ista tota, quam suscepimus tractandam vobis, videte si aliud aliquid commendat quam ipsam unam charitatem. Nec timendum est ne saepe dicendo in odium veniat. Quid enim amatur, si charitas in odium veniat? Qua charitate fit ut caetera bene amentur, ipsa quomodo amanda est? Res ergo quae nunquam debet de corde discedere, nec ab ore discedat.
7.2 PL 35, 2030
2. “Now,” saith he, “are ye of God little children, and have overcome him:” whom but Antichrist? For above he had said, “Whosoever unmaketh Jesus Christ and denieth that He is come in the flesh is not of God.” Now we expounded, if ye remember, that all those who violate charity deny Jesus Christ to have come in the flesh. For Jesus had no need to come but because of charity: as indeed the charity we are commending is that which the Lord Himself commendeth in the Gospel, “Greater love than this can no man have, that a man lay down his life for his friends.” How was it possible for the Son of God to lay down His life for us without putting on flesh in which He might die? Whosoever therefore violates charity, let him say what he will with his tongue, his life denies that Christ is come in the flesh; and this is an antichrist, wherever he may be, whithersoever he have come in. But what saith the apostle to them who are citizens of that country for which we sigh? “Ye have overcome him.” And whereby have they overcome? “Because greater is He that is in you, than he that is in this world.” Lest they should attribute the victory to their own strength, and by arrogance of pride should be overcome, (for whomsoever the devil makes proud, he overcomes,) wishing them to keep humility, what saith he? “Ye have overcome him.” Every man now, at hearing this saying, “Ye have overcome,” lifts up the head, lifts up the neck, wishes himself to be praised. Do not extol thyself; see who it is that in thee hath overcome. Why hast thou overcome? “Because greater is He that is in you, than he that is in the world.” Be humble, bear thy Lord; be thou the beast for Him to sit on. Good is it for thee that He should rule, and He guide. For if thou have not Him to sit on thee, thou mayest lift up the neck, mayest strike out the heels: but woe to thee without a ruler, for this liberty sendeth thee among the wild beasts to be devoured!
Jam vos, inquit, ex Deo estis filioli, et vicistis eum: quem, nisi Antichristum? Superius enim dixerat, Omnis qui solvit Jesum Christum et negat eum in carne venisse, non est ex Deo . Exposuimus autem, si meministis, quia omnes negant Jesum Christum in carne venisse, qui violant charitatem. Jesus enim non opus erat ut veniret, nisi propter charitatem. Charitas enim nobis illa commendatur, quam et ipse in Evangelio commendat: Majorem hac dilectionem nemo potest habere, quam ut animam suam ponat pro amicis suis . Quomodo poterat Filius Dei animam suam ponere pro nobis, nisi carne inducretur, ubi mori posset? Quisquis ergo violat charitatem, quodlibet dicat lingua, vita ipsius negat Christum in carne venisse; et iste est antichristus, ubicumque fuerit, quocumque intraverit. Sed quid dicit eis qui cives sunt illius patriae cui suspiramus? Vicistis eum. Et unde vicerunt? Quia major est qui est in vobis, quam qui in hoc mundo. Ne victoriam suis viribus tribuerent, et arrogantia superbiae vincerentur (quemcumque enim diabolus superbum fecerit, vincit), volens eos servare humilitatem, quid ait? Vicistis eum. Jam omnis homo qui audit, Vicistis, erigit caput, erigit cervicem, laudari se vult. Noli te extollere, vide quis in te vicit. Quare vicisti? Quia major est qui est in vobis, quam qui in hoc mundo. Esto humilis, porta Dominum tuum; esto jumentum sessoris tui. Bonum tibi est ut ipse regat, et ipse ducat. Nam si ipsum sessorem non habueris, cervicem erigere potes, calces potes mittere: sed vae tibi sine rectore; quia libertas ista in bestias te mittit comedendum.
7.3 PL 35, 2030
3. “These are of the world.” Who? The antichrists. Ye have already heard who they be. And if ye be not such, ye know them, but whosoever is such, knows not. “These are of the world: therefore speak they of the world, and the world heareth them.” Who are they that “speak of the world”? Mark who are against charity. Behold, ye have heard the Lord saying, “If ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will forgive you also your trespasses. But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.” It is the sentence of Truth: or if it be not Truth that speaks, gainsay it. If thou art a Christian and believest Christ, He hath said, “I am the truth.” This sentence is true, is firm. Now hear men that “speak of the world.” “And wilt thou not avenge thyself? And wilt thou let him say that he has done this to thee? Nay: let him feel that he has to do with a man.” Every day are such things said, They that say such things, “of the world speak they, and the world heareth them.” None say such things but those that love the world, and by none are such things heard but by those who love the world. And ye have heard that to love the world and neglect charity is to deny that Jesus came in the flesh. Or say if the Lord Himself in the flesh did that? if, being buffeted, He willed to be avenged? if, hanging on the cross, He did not say, “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do”? But if He threatened not, who had power; why dost thou threaten, why art thou inflated with anger, who art under power of another? He died because it was His will to die, yet He threatened not; thou knowest not when thou shalt die, and dost thou threaten?
Hi de mundo sunt. Qui? Antichristi. Jam audistis qui sint. Et si non estis, cognoscitis eos: quisquis autem hoc est, non cognoscit. Hi de mundo sunt: ideo de mundo loquuntur, et mundus eos audit. Qui sunt qui de mundo loquuntur? Attendite qui contra charitatem. Ecce audistis Dominum dicentem, Si dimiseritis peccata hominibus, dimittet vobis et Pater vester coelestis peccata vestra: si autem non dimiseritis, nec Pater vester dimittet vobis peccata vestra . Sententia est veritatis: aut si non veritas loquitur, contradic. Si christianus es, et credis Christo, ipse dixit, Ego sum veritas . Sententia ista vera est, firma est. Jam audi homines de mundo loquentes. Et non te vindicaturus es, et dicturus est ille quia fecit tibi? Imo sentias quia cum viro habet. Quotidie dicuntur ista. De mundo loquuntur qui ista dicunt; et mundus eos audit. Nec dicunt ista nisi qui diligunt mundum; neque audiuntur ista nisi ab his qui diligunt mundum. Et qui diligit mundum, et negligit charitatem, audistis quia negat Jesum in carne venisse. Aut si fecit illud in carne ipse Dominus? Si cum expalmaretur, voluit se vindicari? Si cum in cruce penderet, non dixit, Pater, ignosce illis, quia nesciunt quid faciunt . Si autem non minabatur qui potestatem habebat; tu quid minaris, quid sufflas in potestate aliena constitutus? Ille quia voluit mortuus est, et non minabatur; tu nescis quando morieris, et minaris?
7.4 PL 35, 2031
4. “We are of God.” Let us see why; see whether it be for any other thing than charity. “We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us. Hereby know we the spirit of truth, and of error:” namely by this, that he that heareth us hath the spirit of truth; he that heareth not us, hath the spirit of error. Let us see what he adviseth, and let us choose rather to hear him advising in the spirit of truth, and not antichrists, not lovers of the world, not the world. If we are born of God, “beloved,” he goes on—see above from what: “We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us. Hereby know we the spirit of truth, and of error:” aye, now, he makes us eagerly attentive: to be told that he who knows God, hears; but he who knows not, hears not; and that this is the discerning between the spirit of truth and the spirit of error: well then, let us see what he is about to advise; in what we must hear him—“Beloved, let us love one another.” Why? because a man adviseth? “Because love is of God.” Much hath he commended love, in that he hath said, “Is of God:” but he is going to say more; let us eagerly hear. At present he hath said, “Love is of God; and every one that loveth is born of God, and knoweth God. He that loveth not knoweth not God.” Why? “For God is love” [Love is God]. What more could be said, brethren? If nothing were said in praise of love throughout the pages of this epistle, if nothing whatever throughout the other pages of the Scriptures, and this one only thing were all we were told by the voice of the Spirit of God, “For Love is God;” nothing more ought we to require.
Nos ex Deo sumus. Videamus quare: videte si propter aliud quam propter charitatem. Nos ex Deo sumus. Qui novit Deum, audit nos: qui non est ex Deo, non nos audit. Ex hoc cognoscimus spiritum veritatis et erroris. Quia qui audit nos, spiritum habet veritatis: qui non audit nos, spiritum habet erroris. Videamus quid monet, et audiamus eum potius in spiritu veritatis monentem; non antichristos, non amatores mundi, non mundum: si ex Deo nati sumus, Dilectissimi, sequitur supra, videte quid: Nos ex Deo sumus. Qui novit Deum, audit nos: qui non est ex Deo, non nos audit. Ex hoc cognoscitur spiritus veritatis et erroris. Jam ergo intentos nos fecit: quia qui novit Deum, ipse audit; qui autem non novit, non audit: et haec discretio est spiritus veritatis et erroris. Videamus quid moniturus est, in quo illum audire debeamus. Dilectissimi, diligamus invicem. Quare? quia homo monet? Quia dilectio ex Deo est. Multum commendavit dilectionem, quia dixit ex Deo est: plus dicturus est, intente audiamus. Modo dixit, Dilectio ex Deo est: et omnis qui diligit, ex Deo natus est, et cognovit Deum. Qui non diligit, non novit Deum. Quare? Quia Deus dilectio est. Quid amplius dici potuit, fratres? Si nihil de laude dilectionis diceretur per omnes istas paginas hujus Epistolae, si nihil omnino per caeteras paginas Scripturarum, et hoc solum unum audiremus de voce Spiritus Dei, Quia Deus dilectio est; nihil amplius quaerere deberemus.
7.5 PL 35, 2031
5. Now see that to act against love is to act against God. Let no man say, “I sin against man when I do not love my brother, (mark it!) and sin against man is a thing to be taken easily; only let me not sin against God.” How sinnest thou not against God, when thou sinnest against love? “Love is God.” Do “we” say this? If we said, “Love is God,” haply some one of you might be offended and say, What hath he said? What meant he to say, that “Love is God”? God “gave” love, as a gift God bestowed love. “Love is of God: Love IS God.” Look, here have ye, brethren, the Scriptures of God: this epistle is canonical; throughout all nations it is recited, it is held by the authority of the whole earth, it hath edified the whole earth. Thou art here told by the Spirit of God, “Love is God.” Now if thou dare, go against God, and refuse to love thy brother!
Jam videte quia facere contra dilectionem, facere contra Deum est. Nemo dicat: In hominem pecco, quando non diligo fratrem meum (intendite); et facile est peccatum in hominem, in Deum solum non peccem. Quomodo non peccas in Deum, quando in dilectionem peccas? Deus dilectio est. Numquid nos dicimus? Si nos diceremus, Deus dilectio est; forte scandalizaretur aliquis ex vobis, et diceret. Quid dixit? quid voluit dicere, quia Deus dilectio est? Dedit dilectionem Deus, donavit Deus dilectionem. Ex Deo est dilectio: Deus dilectio est. Ecce habetis, fratres, Scripturas Dei: canonica est ista Epistola; per omnes gentes recitatur, orbis terrae auctoritate retinetur, orbem terrarum ipsa aedificavit. Audis hic ab Spiritu Dei, Deus dilectio est. Jam si audes, fac contra Deum, et noli diligere fratrem tuum.
7.6 PL 35, 2031
6. In what sense then was it said a while ago, “Love is of God;” and now, “Love IS God?” For God is Father and Son and Holy Ghost: the Son, God of God, the Holy Ghost, God of God; and these three, one God, not three Gods. If the Son be God, and the Holy Ghost God, and that person loveth in whom dwelleth the Holy Ghost: therefore “Love is God;” but “IS God,” because “Of God.” For thou hast both in the epistle; both, “Love is of God,” and, “Love is God.” Of the Father alone the Scripture hath it not to say, that He is “of God:” but when thou hearest that expression, “Of God,” either the Son is meant, or the Holy Ghost. Because while the apostle saith, “The love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Spirit which is given unto us:” let us understand that He who subsisteth in love is the Holy Ghost. For it is even this Holy Spirit, whom the bad cannot receive, even He is that Fountain of which the Scripture saith, “Let the fountain of thy water be thine own, and let no stranger partake with thee.” For all who love not God, are strangers, are antichrists. And though they come to the churches, they cannot be numbered among the children of God; not to them belongeth that Fountain of life. To have baptism is possible even for a bad man; to have prophecy is possible even for a bad man. We find that king Saul had prophecy: he was persecuting holy David, yet was he filled with the spirit of prophecy, and began to prophesy. To receive the sacrament of the body and blood of the Lord is possible even for a bad man: for of such it is said, “He that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh judgment to himself.” To have the name of Christ is possible even for a bad man; i.e. even a bad man can be called a Christian: as they of whom it is said, “They polluted the name of their God.” I say, to have all these sacraments is possible even for a bad man; but to have charity, and to be a bad man, is not possible. This then is the peculiar gift, this the “Fountain” that is singly one’s “own.” To drink of this the Spirit of God exhorteth you, to drink of Himself the Spirit of God exhorteth you.
Quomodo ergo jamdudum, Dilectio ex Deo est; et modo, Dilectio Deus est? Est enim Deus Pater et Filius et Spiritus sanctus: Filius, Deus ex Deo; Spiritus sanctus, Deus ex Deo; et hi tres unus Deus, non tres dii. Si Filius Deus, et Spiritus sanctus Deus, et ille diligit in quo habitat Spiritus sanctus: ergo dilectio Deus est; sed Deus quia ex Deo. Utrumque enim habes in Epistola; et, Dilectio ex Deo est, et, Dilectio Deus est. De solo Patre Scriptura non novit dicere quia ex Deo est. Cum autem audis, ex Deo; aut Filius intelligitur, aut Spiritus sanctus. Quia vero dicit Apostolus, Charitas Dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris per Spiritum sanctum qui datus est nobis. ; intelligamus in dilectione Spiritum sanctum esse. Ipse est enim Spiritus sanctus, quem non possunt accipere mali; ipse est ille fons de quo dicit Scriptura, Fons aquae tuae sit tibi proprius, et nemo alienus communicet tibi . Omnes enim qui non diligunt Deum, alieni sunt, antichristi sunt. Et quamvis intrent basilicas, non possunt numerari inter filios Dei; non ad illos pertinet fons ille vitae. Habere Baptismum et malus potest; habere prophetiam et malus potest. Invenimus Saülem regem habuisse prophetiam: persequebatur sanctum David, et impletus est Spiritu prophetiae, et prophetare coepit . Accipere Sacramentum corporis et sanguinis Domini et malus potest: nam de talibus dictum est, Qui manducat et bibit indigne, judicium sibi manducat et bibit . Habere nomen Christi et malus potest; id est, christianus vocari et malus potest: de quibus dictum est, Polluebant nomen Dei sui . Ergo habere sacramenta ista omnia et malus potest; habere autem charitatem, et malus esse, non potest. Hoc est ergo proprium donum; ipse est singularis fons. Ad hunc bibendum, vos hortatur Spiritus Dei; ad se bibendum vos hortatur Spiritus Dei.
7.7 PL 35, 2032
7. “In this was manifested the love of God in us.” Behold, in order that we may love God, we have exhortation. Could we love Him, unless He first loved us? If we were slow to love, let us not be slow to love in return. He first loved us; not even so do we love. He loved the unrighteous, but He did away the unrighteousness: He loved the unrighteous, but not unto unrighteousness did He gather them together: He loved the sick, but He visited them to make them whole. “Love,” then, “is God.” “In this was manifested the love of God in us, because that God sent His only-begotten Son into the world, that we may live through Him.” As the Lord Himself saith: “Greater love than this can no man have, that a man lay down his life for his friends:” and there was proved the love of Christ towards us, in that He died for us: how is the love of the Father towards us proved? In that He “sent His only Son” to die for us: so also the apostle Paul saith: “He that spared not His own Son, but delivered Him up for us all, how hath He not with Him also freely given us all things?” Behold the Father delivered up Christ; Judas delivered Him up; does it not seem as if the thing done were of the same sort? Judas is “traditor,” one that delivered up, [or, a traitor]: is God the Father that? God forbid! sayest thou. I do not say it, but the apostle saith, “He that spared not His own Son, but “tradidit Eum” delivered Him up for us all.” Both the Father delivered Him up, and He delivered up Himself. The same apostle saith: “Who loved me, and delivered Himself up for me.” If the Father delivered up the Son; and the Son delivered up Himself, what has Judas done? There was a “traditio” (delivering up) by the Father; there was a “traditio” by the Son; there was a “traditio” by Judas: the thing done is the same, but what is it that distinguishes the Father delivering up the Son, the Son delivering up Himself, and Judas the disciple delivering up his Master? This: that the Father and the Son did it in love, but Judas did this in treacherous betrayal. Ye see that not what the man does is the thing to be considered; but with what mind and will he does it. We find God the Father in the same deed in which we find Judas; the Father we bless, Judas we detest. Why do we bless the Father, and detest Judas? We bless charity, detest iniquity. How great a good was conferred upon mankind by the delivering up of Christ! Had Judas this in his thoughts, that therefore he delivered Him up? God had in His thoughts our salvation by which we were redeemed; Judas had in his thoughts the price for which he sold the Lord. The Son Himself had in His thoughts the price He gave for us, Judas in his the price he received to sell Him. The diverse intention therefore makes the things done diverse. Though the thing be one, yet if we measure it by the diverse intentions, we find the one a thing to be loved, the other to be condemned; the one we find a thing to be glorified, the other to be detested. Such is the force of charity. See that it alone discriminates, it alone distinguishes the doings of men.
In hoc manifestata est dilectio Dei in nobis. Ecce, ut diligamus Deum, hortationem habemus. Possemus illum diligere, nisi prior ille diligeret? Si pigri eramus ad amandum, non simus pigri ad redamandum. Prior amavit nos; nec sic nos amamus. Iniquos amavit, sed iniquitatem solvit: iniquos amavit, sed non ad iniquitatem congregavit. Aegrotos amavit, sed sanandos visitavit. Deus ergo dilectio est. In hoc manifestata est dilectio Dei in nobis, quia Filium suum unigenitum misit in hunc mundum, ut vivamus per ipsum. Quomodo ipse Dominus ait, Majorem dilectionem nemo potest habere, quam ut animam suam ponat pro amicis suis; et ibi probata est dilectio Christi in nos, quia mortuus est pro nobis. Dilectio Patris unde probata est in nos? Quia Filium suum unicum misit mori pro nobis: sic et Paulus apostolus dicit, Qui Filio proprio non peporcit, sed pro nobis omnibus tradidit eum, quomodo non et cum illo omnia nobis donavit ? Ecce Christum tradidit Pater, tradidit Judas; numquid non quasi simile factum videtur? Traditor est Judas: ergo traditor est et Deus Pater? Absit, inquis. Non dico, sed Apostolus dicit: Qui Filio proprio non pepercit, sed pro nobis omnibus tradidit eum. Et Pater illum tradidit, et ipse se tradidit. Ait idem apostolus: Qui me dilexit, et tradidit seipsum pro me . Si Pater tradidit Filium, et tradidit seipsum Filius, Judas quid fecit? Facta est traditio a Patre, facta est traditio a Filio, facta est traditio a Juda; una res facta est: sed quae res discernit Patrem tradentem Filium, seipsum Filium tradentem, et Judam discipulum tradentem magistrum suum? Quia hoc fecit Pater et Filius in charitate; fecit autem hoc Judas in proditione. Videtis quia non quid faciat homo, considerandum est; sed quo animo et voluntate faciat. In eodem facto invenimus Deum Patrem, in quo invenimus Judam; Patrem benedicimus, Judam detestamur. Quare Patrem benedicimus, Judam detestamur? Benedicimus charitatem, detestamur iniquitatem. Quantum enim praestitum est generi humano de tradito Christo? Numquid hoc cogitavit Judas ut traderet? Deus cogitavit salutem nostram qua redempti sumus; Judas cogitavit pretium quo vendidit Dominum. Filius ipse cogitavit pretium quod dedit pro nobis; Judas cogitavit pretium quod accepit ut venderet. Diversa ergo intentio diversa facta fecit. Cum sit una res, ex diversis eam intentionibus si metiamur, unum amandum, alterum damnandum; unum glorificandum, alterum detestandum invenimus. Tantum valet charitas. Videte quia sola discernit, videte quia facta hominum sola distinguit.
7.8 PL 35, 2033
8. This we have said in the case where the things done are similar. In the case where they are diverse, we find a man by charity made fierce; and by iniquity made winningly gentle. A father beats a boy, and a boy-stealer caresses. If thou name the two things, blows and caresses, who would not choose the caresses, and decline the blows? If thou mark the persons, it is charity that beats, iniquity that caresses. See what we are insisting upon; that the deeds of men are only discerned by the root of charity. For many things may be done that have a good appearance, and yet proceed not from the root of charity. For thorns also have flowers: some actions truly seem rough, seem savage; howbeit they are done for discipline at the bidding of charity. Once for all, then, a short precept is given thee: Love, and do what thou wilt: whether thou hold thy peace, through love hold thy peace; whether thou cry out, through love cry out; whether thou correct, through love correct; whether thou spare, through love do thou spare: let the root of love be within, of this root can nothing spring but what is good.
Hoc diximus in similibus factis. In diversis factis, invenimus saevientem hominem factum de charitate; et blandum factum de iniquitate. Puerum caedit pater, et mango blanditur. Si duas res proponas, plagas et blandimenta; quis non eligat blandimenta, et fugiat plagas? Si personas attendas, charitas caedit, blanditur iniquitas. Videte quid commendamus, quia non discernuntur facta hominum, nisi de radice charitatis. Nam multa fieri possunt quae speciem habent bonam, et non procedunt de radice charitatis. Habent enim et spinae flores: quaedam vero videntur aspera, videntur truculenta; sed fiunt ad disciplinam dictante charitate. Semel ergo breve praeceptum tibi praecipitur, Dilige, et quod vis fac: sive taceas, dilectione taceas; sive clames, dilectione clames; sive emendes, dilectione emendes; sive parcas, dilectione parcas: radix sit intus dilectionis, non potest de ista radice nisi bonum existere.
7.9 PL 35, 2033
9. “In this is love—in this was manifested the love of God toward us, because that God sent his only-begotten Son into this world, that we may live through Him.—In this is love, not that we loved God, but that He loved us:” we did not love Him first: for to this end loved He us, that we may love Him: “And sent His Son to be the Atoner for our sins: “litatorem,” i.e. one that sacrifices. He sacrificed for our sins. Where did He find the sacrifice? Where did He find the victim which he would offer pure? Other He found none; His own self He offered. “Beloved, if God so loved us we ought also to love one another. Peter,” saith He, “lovest thou me?” And he said, “I love.” “Feed my sheep.”
In hoc est dilectio. In hoc manifestata est dilectio Dei in nobis, quia Deus Filium suum misit unigenitum in hunc mundum, ut vivamus per ipsum. In hoc est dilectio, non quia nos dileximus, sed quia ipse dilexit nos. Non illum dileximus prius: nam ad hoc nos dilexit, ut diligamus eum. Et misit Filium suum litatorem pro peccatis nostris: litatorem, sacrificatorem. Sacrificavit pro peccatis nostris. Ubi invenit hostiam? ubi invenit victimam quam puram volebat offerre? Aliud non invenit, seipsum obtulit. Dilectissimi, si ita Deus dilexit nos, debemus et nos invicem diligere. Petre, inquit, amas me? Et ille dixit: Amo. Pasce oves meas .
7.10 PL 35, 2033
10. “No man hath seen God at any time:” He is a thing invisible; not with the eye but with the heart must He be sought. But just as if we wished to see the sun, we should purge the eye of the body; wishing to see God, let us purge the eye by which God can be seen. Where is this eye? Hear the Gospel: “Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.” But let no man imagine God to himself according to the lust of his eyes. For so he makes unto himself either a huge form, or a certain incalculable magnitude which, like the light which he sees with the bodily eyes, he makes extend through all directions; field after field of space he gives it all the bigness he can; or, he represents to himself like as it were an old man of venerable form. None of these things do thou imagine. There is something thou mayest imagine, if thou wouldest see God; “God is love.” What sort of face hath love? what form hath it? what stature? what feet? what hands hath it? no man can say. And yet it hath feet, for these carry men to church: it hath hands; for these reach forth to the poor: it hath eyes; for thereby we consider the needy: “Blessed is the man,” it is said, “who considereth the needy and the poor.” It hath ears, of which the Lord saith, “He that hath ears to hear let him hear.” These are not members distinct by place, but with the understanding he that hath charity sees the whole at once. Inhabit, and thou shalt be inhabited; dwell, and thou shalt be dwelt in. For how say you, my brethren? who loves what he does not see? Now why, when charity is praised, do ye lift up your hands, make acclaim, praise? What have I shown you? What I produced, was it a gleam of colors? What I propounded, was it gold and silver? Have I dug out jewels from hid treasures? What of this sort have I shown to your eyes? Is my face changed while I speak? I am in the flesh; I am in the same form in which I came forth to you; ye are in the same form in which ye came hither: charity is praised, and ye shout applause. Certainly ye see nothing. But as it pleases you when ye praise, so let it please you that ye may keep it in your heart. For mark well what I say brethren; I exhort you all, as God enables me, unto a great treasure. If there were shown you a beautiful little vase, embossed, inlaid with gold, curiously wrought, and it charmed your eyes, and drew towards it the eager desire of your heart, and you were pleased with the hand of the artificer, and the weight of the silver, and the splendor of the metal; would not each one of you say, “O, if I had that vase!” And to no purpose ye would say it, for it would not rest with you to have it. Or if one should wish to have it, he might think of stealing it from another’s house. Charity is praised to you; if it please you, have it, possess it: no need that ye should rob any man, no need that ye should think of buying it; it is to be had freely, without cost. Take it, clasp it; there is nothing sweeter. If such it be when it is but spoken of, what must it be when one has it?
Deum nemo vidit unquam: res est invisibilis; non oculo, sed corde quaerendus est. Sed quemadmodum si solem istum videre vellemus, oculum corporis purgaremus, unde videri lux potest; volentes videre Deum, oculum quo Deus videri potest, purgemus. Ubi est iste oculus? Audi Evangelium: Beati mundo corde, quoniam ipsi Deum videbunt . Sed nemo sibi pro concupiscentia oculorum cogitet Deum. Facit enim sibi aut ingentem formam, aut magnitudinem aliquam inaestimabilem distendit per locos, velut lucem istam quam videt his oculis, auget per campos quantum potest; aut facit sibi aliquem quasi venerabilis formae senem. Nihil horum cogites. Est quod cogites, si vis videre Deum: Deus Dilectio est. Qualem faciem habet dilectio? qualem formam habet? qualem staturam habet? quales pedes habet? quales manus habet? Nemo potest dicere. Habet tamen pedes; nam ipsi ducunt ad Ecclesiam: habet manus; nam ipsae pauperi porrigunt: habet oculos; nam inde intelligitur ille qui eget: Beatus, inquit, qui intelligit super egenum et pauperem . Habet aures, de quibus dicit Dominus, Qui habet aures audiendi, audiat . Non sunt membra distincta per locos, sed intellectu totum simul videt qui habet charitatem. Habita, et inhabitaberis; mane, et manebitur in te. Quid enim, fratres mei, quis amat quod non videt? Quare autem quando laudatur charitas, erigimini, acclamatis, laudatis? Quid vobis ostendi? aliquos colores protuli? aurum et argentum proposui? gemmas de thesauris effodi? Quid tale ostendi oculis vestris? numquid facies mea mutata est cum loquor? Carnem gero, in ipsa forma sum in qua processi, in ipsa forma estis in qua venistis: laudatur charitas, et clamatis. Certe nihil videtis. Sed quomodo vobis placet quando laudatis, sic vobis placeat ut in corde servetis. Intendite enim quid dicam, fratres; exhortor vos, quantum dat Dominus, ad magnum thesaurum. Si vobis ostenderetur aliquod vasculum anaglyphum, inauratum, operose factum, et illiceret oculos vestros, et duceret in se intentionem cordis vestri, et placeret vobis manus artificis, et pondus argenti, et splendor metalli; nonne unusquisque vestrum diceret, O si haberem vasculum istud? Et sine causa diceretis, in potestate enim vestra non erat. Aut si quisquam vellet habere, cogitaret illud de domo aliena furari. Laudatur charitas vobis; si placet, habete, possidete: non opus est ut furtum alicui faciatis, non opus est ut emere cogitetis; gratis constat. Tenete eam, amplectimini eam; dulcius illa nihil est. Si cum commemoratur talis est, cum habetur qualis est?
7.11 PL 35, 2034
11. If any of you perchance wish to keep charity, brethren, above all things do not imagine it to be an abject and sluggish thing; nor that charity is to be preserved by a sort of gentleness, nay not gentleness, but tameness and listlessness. Not so is it preserved. Do not imagine that thou then lovest thy servant when thou dost not beat him, or that thou then lovest thy son when thou givest him not discipline, or that thou then lovest thy neighbor when thou dost not rebuke him: this is not charity, but mere feebleness. Let charity be fervent to correct, to amend: but if there be good manners, let them delight thee; if bad, let them be amended, let them be corrected. Love not in the man his error, but the man: for the man God made, the error the man himself made. Love that which God made, love not that which the man himself made. When thou lovest that, thou takest away this: when thou esteemest that, thou amendest this. But even if thou be severe at any time, let it be because of love, for correction. For this cause was charity betokened by the Dove which descended upon the Lord. That likeness of a dove, the likeness in which came the Holy Ghost, by whom charity should be shed forth into us: wherefore was this? The dove hath no gall: yet with beak and wings she fights for her young; hers is a fierceness without bitterness. And so does also a father; when he chastises his son, for discipline he chastises him. As I said, the kidnapper, in order that he may sell, inveigles the child with bitter endearments; a father, that he may correct, does without gall chastise. Such be ye to all men. See here, brethren, a great lesson, a great rule: each one of you has children, or wishes to have; or if he has altogether determined to have no children after the flesh, at least spiritually he desires to have children:—what father does not correct his son? what son does not his father discipline? And yet he seems to be fierce with him. It is the fierceness of love, the fierceness of charity: a sort of fierceness without gall after the manner of the dove, not of the raven. Whence it came into my mind, my brethren, to tell you, that those violaters of charity are they that have made the schism: as they hate charity itself, so they hate also the dove. But the dove convicts them: it comes forth from heaven, the heavens open, and it abideth on the head of the Lord. Wherefore this? That John may hear, “This is He that baptizeth.” Away, ye robbers; away, ye invaders of the possession of Christ! On your own possessions, where ye will needs be lords, ye have dared to fix the titles of the great Owner. He recognizes His own titles; He vindicates to Himself His own possession. He does not cancel the titles, but enters in and takes possession. So in one that comes to the Catholic Church, his baptism is not cancelled, that the title of the commander be not cancelled: but what is done in the Catholic Church? The title is acknowledged; the Owner enters in under His own titles, where the robber was entering in under titles not his own.
Si qui forte vultis servare charitatem, fratres, ante omnia ne putetis abjectam et desidiosam; nec quadam mansuetudine, imo non mansuetudine, sed remissione et negligentia servari charitatem. Non sic servatur. Non putes tunc te amare servum tuum, quando eum non caedis; aut tunc te amare filium tuum, quando ei non das disciplinam; aut tunc te amare vicinum tuum, quando eum non corripis: non est ista charitas, sed languor. Ferveat charitas ad corrigendum, ad emendandum: sed si sunt boni mores, delectent; si sunt mali, emendentur, corrigantur. Noli in homine amare errorem, sed hominem: hominem enim Deus fecit, errorem ipse homo fecit. Ama illud quod Deus fecit, noli amare quod ipse homo fecit. Cum illud amas, illud tollis: cum illud diligis, illud emendas. Sed etsi saevis aliquando, propter correctionis dilectionem. Propterea de columba demonstrata est charitas, quae venit super Dominum . Species illa columbae, in qua specie venit Spiritus sanctus quo nobis charitas infunderetur. Quare hoc? Fel columba non habet: tamen rostro et pennis pro nido pugnat, sine amaritudine saevit. Hoc facit et pater; quando filium castigat, ad disciplinam castigat. Sicut dixi, seductor ut vendat, cum amaritudine blanditur: pater ut corrigat, sine felle castigat. Tales estote ad omnes. Videte, fratres, magnum documentum, magnam regulam: Unusquisque habet filios, aut habere vult; aut si omnino decrevit filios non habere carnaliter, vel spiritualiter cupit habere: quis est qui non corrigit filium suum? quis est cui non det disciplinam pater ? Et tamen saevire videtur. Amor saevit, charitas saevit: saevit quodam modo sine felle, more columbino, non corvino. Unde venit in mentem, fratres mei, dicere vobis quia illi violatores charitatis schisma fecerunt: quomodo oderunt ipsam charitatem, sic oderunt et columbam. Sed convincit illos columba: procedit de coelo, aperiuntur coeli, et manet super caput Domini. Utquid hoc? Ut audiat, Hic est qui baptizat . Recedite, praedones; recedite, invasores possessionis Christi. In possessionibus vestris, ubi dominari vultis, titulos potentis ausi estis infigere. Cognoscit ille titulos suos; vindicat sibi possessionem suam: non delet titulos, sed intrat et possidet. Sic ad Catholicam venienti, non deletur Baptismus, ne titulus imperatoris deleatur. Sed quid fit in Catholica? Agnoscitur titulus; intrat possessor sub titulis suis, quo intrabat praedo sub titulis alienis.