Ten Homilies on the First Epistle of John 6
6.0 1 John III. 19–IV. 3 PL 35, 2019
1 John III. 19–4. 3
“And herein we know that we are of the truth, and assure our hearts before Him. For if our heart think ill of us, God is greater than our heart, and knoweth all things. Beloved, if our heart think not ill of us, then have we confidence toward God. And whatsoever we ask, we shall receive of Him, because we keep His commandments, and do in His sight those things that please Him. And this is His commandment, That we should believe on the name of His Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as He gave us commandment. And he that keepeth His commandments shall dwell in Him, and He in him. And herein we know that He abideth in us, by the Holy Spirit which He hath given us. Dearly beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into this world. In this is known the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God: and every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is the antichrist, of whom ye have heard that he should come; and even now already is he in this world.”
6.1 1 John III. 19–IV. 3 PL 35, 2019
1. If ye remember, brethren, yesterday we closed our sermon at this sentence, which without doubt behooved and does behoove to abide in your heart, seeing it was the last ye heard. “My little children, let us not love only in word and in tongue; but in deed and in truth.” Then he goes on: “And herein we know that we are of the truth, and assure our hearts before Him.” “For if our heart think ill of us, God is greater than our heart, and knoweth all things.” He had said, “Let us not love only in word and in tongue, but in work and in truth:” we are asked, In what work, or in what truth, is he known that loveth God, or loveth his brother? Above he had said up to what point charity is perfected: what the Lord saith in the Gospel, “Greater love than this hath no man, that one lay down his life for his friends,” this same had the apostle also said: “As He laid down His life for us, we ought also to lay down our lives for the brethren.” This is the perfection of charity, and greater can not at all be found. But because it is not perfect in all, and that man ought not to despair in whom it is not perfect, if that be already born which may be perfected: and of course if born, it must be nourished, and by certain nourishments of its own must be brought unto its proper perfection: therefore, we have asked concerning the commencement of charity, where it begins, and there have straightway found: “But whoso hath this world’s goods, and seeth his brother have need, and shutteth up his bowels of compassion from him, how dwelleth the love of the Father in him?” Here then hath this charity, my brethren, its beginning: to give of one’s superfluities to him that hath need to him that is in any distress; of one’s temporal abundance to deliver his brother from temporal tribulation. Here is the first rise of charity. This, being thus begun, if thou shalt nourish with the word of God and hope of the life to come, thou wilt come at last unto that perfection, that thou shalt be ready to lay down thy life for thy brethren.
Si meministis, fratres, hesterno nos clausisse sermonem ad istam sententiam, quae sine dubio manere debuit et debet in corde vestro, quia ipsam novissimam audistis: « Filioli, non diligamus verbo tantum et lingua, sed opere et veritate. » Deinde sequitur: « Et in hoc cognoscimus quia ex veritate sumus, et coram ipso persuademus cordi nostro: quia si male senserit cor nostrum, major est Deus corde nostro, et novit omnia. » Dixerat, « Non diligamus verbo tantum et lingua, sed opere et veritate: » quaeritur a nobis, in quo opere et in qua veritate agnoscitur qui diligit Deum, vel qui diligit fratrem suum. Jam superius dixerat quousque charitas perficiatur; quod et Dominus in Evangelio ait, Majorem hac nemo habet charitatem, quam ut animam suam ponat pro amicis suis : et iste hoc dixerat, Sicut ille animam suam pro nobis posuit, debemus et nos animas pro fratribus ponere. Haec est perfectio charitatis; et major omnino non potest inveniri. Sed quia non in omnibus perfecta est, et desperare non debet in quo perfecta non est, si jam nata est quae perficiatur: et utique si nata est, nutrienda est, et quibusdam suis nutrimentis ad perfectionem propriam perducenda. Quaesivimus inchoationem charitatis unde incipiat, et ibi continue invenimus: Si quis habet facultates mundi, et viderit fratrem suum egentem, et clauserit viscera sua adversus eum; quomodo dilectio Patris manet in illo ? Ergo hic incipit ista charitas, fratres, ut de suis superfluis tribuat egenti, in angustiis aliquibus constituto; ex eo quod sibi abundat secundum tempus, a tribulatione temporali liberet fratrem. Hinc exordium est charitatis. Hanc ita coeptam, si verbo Dei et spe futurae vitae nutrieris, pervenies ad illam perfectionem, ut paratus sis animam tuam ponere pro fratribus tuis.
6.2 PL 35, 2019
2. But, because many such things are done by men who seek other objects, and who love not the brethren; let us come back to the tes timony of conscience. How do we prove that many such things are done by men who love not the brethren? How many in heresies and schisms call themselves martyrs! They seem to themselves to lay down their lives for their brethren. If for the brethren they laid down their lives, they would not separate themselves from the whole brotherhood. Again, how many there are who for the sake of vainglory bestow much, give much, and seek therein but the praise of men and popular glory, which is full of windiness, and possesses no stability! Seeing, then, there are such, where shall be the proof of brotherly charity? Seeing he wished it to be proved, and hath said by way of admonition, “My little children, let us not love only in word and in tongue; but in deed and in truth;” we ask, in what work, in what truth? Can there be a more manifest work than to give to the poor? Many do this of vainglory, not of love. Can there be a greater work than to die for the brethren? This also, many would fain be thought to do, who do it of vainglory to get a name, not from bowels of love. It remains, that that man loves his brother, who before God, where God alone seeth, assures his own heart, and questions his heart whether he does this indeed for love of the brethren; and his witness is that eye which penetrates the heart, where man cannot look. Therefore Paul the Apostle, because he was ready to die for the brethren, and said, “I will myself be spent for your souls,” yet, because God only saw this in his heart, not the mortal men to whom he spake, he saith to them, “But to me it is a very small thing that I should be judged of you or at man’s bar.” And the same apostle shows also in a certain place, that these things are oft done of empty vainglory, not upon the solid ground of love: for speaking of the praises of charity he saith, “If I distribute all my goods to the poor, and if I deliver up my body to be burned, but have not charity, it profiteth me nothing.” Is it possible for a man to do this without charity? It is. For they that have divided unity, are persons that have not charity. Seek there, and ye shall see many giving much to the poor; shall see others prepared to welcome death, insomuch that where there is no persecutor they cast themselves headlong: these doubtless without charity do this. Let us come back then to conscience, of which the apostle saith: “For our glorying is this, the testimony of our conscience.” Let us come back to conscience, of which the same saith, “But let each prove his own work, and then he shall have glorying in himself and not in another.” Therefore, let each one of us “prove his own work,” whether it flow forth from the vein of charity, whether it be from charity as the root that his good works sprout forth as branches. “But let each prove his own work, and then he shall have glorying in himself and not in another,” not when another’s tongue bears witness to him, but when his own conscience bears it.
Sed quia multa talia fiunt ab his qui alia quaerunt, et qui fratres non amant; revocemur ad testimonium conscientiae. Unde probamus quia talia multa fiunt ab his qui fratres non amant? Quam multi se in haeresibus et schismatibus martyres dicunt! Videntur sibi animam ponere pro fratribus suis. Si pro fratribus animam ponerent, non se ab universa fraternitate separarent. Item quam multi sunt qui jactantiae causa multa tribuunt, multa donant; et non ibi quaenunt nisi laudem humanam et gloriam popularem, plenam ventis, nulla stabilitate solidatam! Quia ergo sunt tales, ubi probanda erit charitas fraterna? quia voluit illam probari, et ait admonens: Filioli, non diligamus verbo tantum et lingua, sed opere et veritate. Quaerimus, In quo opere, in qua veritate? Potest esse manifestius opus, quam tribuere pauperibus? Multi hoc jactantia faciunt, non dilectione. Potest esse majus opus, quam mori pro fratribus? Et hoc multi volunt putari se facere, jactantia nominis comparandi, non visceribus dilectionis. Restat ut ille diligat fratrem, qui ante Deum ubi solus videt, cordi suo persuadet, et interrogat cor suum an vere propter fratrum dilectionem hoc faciat; et perhibet illi testimonium oculus qui penetrat cor, quo homo attendere non potest. Ideo Paulus apostolus, quia paratus erat mori pro fratribus, et dicebat, Ipse impendar pro animabus vestris : tamen quia Deus hoc videbat in corde ipsius, non homines quibus loquebatur, ait illis, Mihi autem minimum est ut a vobis dijudicer, aut ab humano die . Et ostendit etiam ipse quodam loco quia solent ista fieri inani jactantia, non firmamento charitatis: ait enim cum de ipsius charitatis commendatione loqueretur, Si distribuero omnia mea pauperibus, et tradidero corpus meum ut ardeam, charitatem autem non habeam, nihil mihi prodest . Potest enim quisquam hoc facere sine charitate? Potest. Nam qui non habent charitatem, diviserunt unitatem. Quaerite ibi, et videbitis multos multa tribuere pauperibus; videbitis alios paratos ad suscipiendam mortem, ita ut desistente persecutore, seipsos praecipitent: isti sine dubio sine charitate hoc faciunt. Revocemur ergo ad conscientiam, de qua dicit Apostolus: Nam gloria nostra haec est, testimonium conscientiae nostrae . Revocemur ad conscientiam, de qua idem dicit: Opus autem suum probet unusquisque, et tunc in semetipso gloriam habebit, et non in altero . Opus ergo suum probet unusquisque nostrum, utrum de vena charitatis emanet, utrum de radice dilectionis rami bonorum operum pullulent. Opus autem suum probet unusquisque, ait, et tunc in semetipso gloriam habebit, et non in altero: non quando illi perhibet testimonium lingua aliena, sed quando perhibet conscientia propria.
6.3 PL 35, 2020
3. This it is then that he enforces here. “In this we know that we are of the truth, when in deed and in truth” we love, “not only in words and in tongue: and assure our heart before Him.” What meaneth, “before Him?” Where He seeth. Whence the Lord Himself in the Gospel saith: “Take heed that ye do not your righteousness before men, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no reward with your Father which is in heaven.” And what meaneth, “Let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth:” except that the right hand means a pure conscience, the left hand the lust of the world? Many through lust of the world do many wonderful things: the left hand worketh, not the right. The right hand ought to work, and without knowledge of the left hand, so that lust of the world may not even mix itself therewith when by love we work aught that is good. And where do we get to know this? Thou art before God: question thine heart, see what thou hast done, and what therein was thine aim; thy salvation, or the windy praise of men. Look within, for man cannot judge whom he cannot see. If “we assure our heart,” let it be “before Him.” Because “if our heart think ill of us,” i.e. accuse us within, that we do not the thing with that mind it ought to be done withal, “greater is God than our heart, and knoweth all things.” Thou hidest thine heart from man: hide it from God if thou canst! How shalt thou hide it from Him, to whom it is said by a sinner, fearing and confessing, “Whither shall I go from Thy Spirit? and from Thy face whither shall I flee?” He sought a way to flee, to escape the judgment of God, and found none. For where is God not? “If I shall ascend,” saith he, “into heaven, Thou art there: if I shall descend into hell, Thou art there.” Whither wilt thou go? whither wilt thou flee? Wilt thou hear counsel? If thou wouldest flee from Him, flee to Him. Flee to Him by confessing, not from Him by hiding: hide thou canst not, but confess thou canst. Say unto Him, “Thou art my place to flee unto;” and let love be nourished in thee, which alone leadeth unto life. Let thy conscience bear thee witness that thy love is of God. If it be of God, do not wish to display it before men; because neither men’s praises lift thee unto heaven, nor their censures put thee down from thence. Let Him see, who crowneth thee: be He thy witness, by whom as judge thou art crowned. “Greater is God than our heart, and knoweth all things.”
Hoc ergo hic commendat. In hoc cognoscimus quia ex veritate sumus, quando opere et veritate, non verbis et lingua tantum diligimus: et coram ipso persuademus cordi nostro, Quid est, coram ipso? Ubi ipse videt. Unde ipse Dominus in Evangelio: Cavete, inquit, facere justitiam vestram coram hominibus, ut videamini ab eis: alioquin mercedem non habebitis apud Patrem vestrum qui in coelis est. Et quid est, Nesciat sinistra tua quid faciat dextera tua : nisi quia dextera, pura conscientia est; sinistra, mundi cupiditas? Multi per cupiditatem mundi multa mira faciunt; sinistra operatur, non dextra. Dextra debet operari, et nesciente sinistra, ut nec misceat se cupiditas saeculi, quando aliquid boni dilectione operamur. Et ubi hoc cognoscimus? Ante Deum es, interroga cor tuum: vide quid fecisti, et quid ibi appetisti; salutem tuam, an laudem hominum ventosam. Intus vide: nam homo judicare non potest quem videre non potest. Si persuademus cordi nostro, coram ipso persuadeamus. Quia si male sentiat cor nostrum, id est, accuset nos intus, quia non eo animo facimus quod faciendum sit; major est Deus corde nostro, et novit omnia. Cor tuum abscondis ab homine; a Deo absconde si potes. Quomodo abscondes ab eo, cui dictum est a peccatore quodam timente et confitente: Quo ibo a spiritu tuo? et a facie tua quo fugiam? Quaerebat qua fugeret, ut evaderet judicium Dei, et non inveniebat. Ubi enim non est Deus? Si ascendero, inquit, in coelum, ibi es: si descendero in infernum, ades . Quo iturus es? quo fugies? Vis audire consilium? Si vis ab illo fugere, ad ipsum fuge. Ad ipsum fuge confitendo, non ab ipso latendo: latere enim non potes, sed confiteri potes. Dic illi, Refugium meum es tu ; et nutriatur in te dilectio, quae sola perducit ad vitam. Perhibeat tibi testimonium conscientia tua, quia ex Deo est. Si ex Deo est, noli illam velle ante homines jactare; quia nec laudes hominum te levant in coelum, nec vituperationes inde te deponunt. Ille videat qui coronat; ille sit testis quo judice coronaris. Major est Deus corde nostro, et novit omnia.
6.4 PL 35, 2021
4. “Beloved, if our heart think not ill of us, we have confidence towards God:”—What meaneth, “If our heart think not ill”? If it make true answer to us, that we love and that there is genuine love in us: not feigned but sincere; seeking a brother’s salvation, expecting no emolument from a brother, but only his salvation—“we have confidence toward God: and whatsoever we ask, we shall receive of Him, because we keep His commandments.”—Therefore, not in the sight of men, but where God Himself seeth, in the heart—“we have confidence,” then, “towards God: and whatsoever we ask, we shall receive of Him:” howbeit, because we keep His commandments. What are “His commandments”? Must we be always repeating? “A new commandment give I unto you, that ye love one another.” It is charity itself that he speaks of, it is this that he enforces. Whoso then shall have brotherly charity, and have it before God, where God seeth, and his heart being interrogated under righteous examination make him none other answer than that the genuine root of charity is there for good fruits to come from; that man hath confidence with God, and whatsoever he shall ask, he shall receive of Him, because he keepeth His commandments.
Dilectissimi, si cor non male senserit, fiduciam habemus ad Deum. Quid est, cor non male senserit? Verum nobis responderit, quia diligimus, et germana dilectio est in nobis: non ficta, sed sincera; salutem fraternam quaerens, nullum emolumentum exspectans a fratre, nisi salutem ipsius. Fiduciam habemus ad Deum; et quidquid postulaverimus, accipiemus ab eo, quia mandata ejus servamus. Ideo non in conspectu hominum, sed ubi ipse Deus videt in corde. Fiduciam ergo habemus ad Deum; et quidquid postulaverimus, ab eo accipiemus: sed, quia mandata ejus servamus. Quae sunt mandata ejus? Numquid semper repetendum est? Mandatum norum do vobis, ut vos invicem diligatis . Ipsam charitatem loquitur, ipsam commendat. Quisquis ergo habuerit charitatem fraternam, et coram Deo habuerit, ubi Deus videt, corque ejus interrogatum sub justo examine, non ei aliud responderit, quam germanam ibi esse radicem charitatis, unde boni fructus existant; habet fiduciam apud Deum, et quidquid postulaverit, ab eo accipiet, quia mandata ejus servat.
6.5 PL 35, 2021
5. Here a question meets us: for it is not this or that man, or thou or I that come in question,—for if I have asked any thing of God and receive it not, any person may easily say of me, “He hath not charity:” and of any man soever of this present time, this may easily be said; and let any think what he will, a man of man:—not we, but those come more in question, those men of whom it is on all hands known that they were saints when they wrote, and that they are now with God. Where is the man that hath charity, if Paul had it not, who said, “Our mouth is open unto you, O ye Corinthians, our heart is enlarged; ye are not straitened in us:” who said, “I will myself be spent for your souls:” and so great grace was in him, that it was manifested that he had charity. And yet we find that he asked and did not receive. What say we, brethren? It is a question: look attentively to God: it is a great question, this also. Just as, where it was said of sin, “He that is born of God sinneth not:” we found this sin to be the violating of charity, and that this was the thing strictly intended in that place: so too we ask now what it is that he would say. For if thou look but to the words, it seems plain: if thou take the examples into the account, it is obscure. Than the words here nothing can be plainer. “And whatsoever we ask, we shall receive of Him, because we keep His commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in His sight.” “Whatsoever we ask,” saith he, “we shall receive of Him.” He hath put us sorely to straits. In the other place also he would put us to straits, if he meant all sin: but then we found room to expound it in this, that he meant it of a certain sin, not of all sin; howbeit of a sin which “whosoever is born of God committeth not:” and we found that this same sin is none other than the violation of charity. We have also a manifest example from the Gospel, when the Lord saith, “If I had not come, they had not had sin.” How? Were the Jews innocent when He came to them, because He so speaks? Then if He had not come, would they have had no sin? Then did the Physician’s presence make one sick, not take away the fever? What madman even would say this? He came not but to cure and heal the sick. Therefore when He said, “If I had not come, they had not had sin,” what would He have to be understood, but a certain sin in particular? For there was a sin which the Jews would not have had. What sin? That they believed not on Him, that when he had come they despised Him. As then He there said “sin,” and it does not follow that we are to understand all sin, but a certain sin: so here also not all sin, lest it be contrary to that place where he saith, “If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us:” but a certain sin in particular, that is, the violation of charity. But in this place he hath bound us more tightly: “If we shall ask,” he hath said, “if our heart accuse us not, and tell us in answer, in the sight of God, that true love is in us;” “Whatsoever we ask, we shall receive of Him.”
Occurrit quaestio quaedam, quia non ille aut ille homo, aut tu aut ego, qui si petiero aliquid a Domino Deo nostro, et non accepero, facile de me potest dicere unusquisque, Non habet charitatem; et de quolibet homine hujus temporis facile dici potest; et sentiat quis quod vult homo de homine: majorem quaestionem non faciunt, nisi illi viri, quos sanctos constat fuisse cum scriberent, et modo esse cum Deo. Quis habet charitatem, si eam Paulus non habebat, qui dicebat, Os nostrum patet ad vos, o Corinthii, cor nostrum dilatatum est; non angustamini in nobis ; qui dicebat, Impendar pro animabus vestris : et tanta gratia in illo erat, ut manifestaretur eum habere charitatem? Invenimus eum tamen petisse, et non accepisse. Quid dicimus, fratres? Quaestio est; intenti estote ad Deum Magna et ista quaestio est. Quomodo de peccato ubi dictum est, Qui natus est ex Deo, non peccat ; invenimus hoc esse peccatum violare charitatem, et hoc proprie designatum esse in hoc loco: sic et nunc quaerimus quid dixerit. Si enim verba attendas, planum videtur; si exempla, obscurum est. Verbis his nihil est planius: « Et quidquid postulaverimus, accipiemus ab eo; quia mandata ejus servamus, et quae placent illi, in conspectu ejus facimus. Quidquid postulaverimus, » ait, « accipiemus ab eo. » Angustavit vehementer. Quia et ibi angustaret, si diceret omne peccatum: sed ideo invenimus locum exponendi, quia de certo peccato dixit, non de omni; sed de quodam peccato, quod omnis qui ex Deo natus est, non facit: et invenimus ipsum quoddam peccatum violationem esse charitatis. Et habemus exemplum de Evangelio manifestum, quando ait Dominus, Si non venissem, peccatum non haberent . Quid ergo? ad innocentes Judaeos venerat, quia sic loquitur? Ergo si ipse non veniret, peccatum non haberent? Praesentia ergo medici fecit aegrotum, febrem non abstulit? Quis hoc vel demens dicat? Ille non venit nisi curare et sanare aegrotos. Quare ergo dixit, Si non venissem, peccatum non haberent, nisi quia certum quoddam peccatum voluit intelligi? Quoddam enim peccatum non haberent Judaei. Quod peccatum? Quo in eum non crediderunt, quo praesentem contempserunt. Sicut ergo ibi peccatum dixit, et non est consequens ut omne peccatum intelligamus, sed certum peccatum: sic et hic non omne peccatum, ne contrarius sit illi loco ubi ait, Si dixerimus quia peccatum non habemus, nosmetipsos seducimus, et veritas in nobis non est ; sed certum quoddam peccatum, id est, violationem charitatis. Hic autem plus nos constrinxit: Si petierimus, dixit, si nos non accusaverit cor nostrum, et renuntiaverit in conspectu Dei quia vera dilectio est in nobis; quidquid postulaverimus, ab eo accipiemus.
6.6 PL 35, 2022
6. Well now: I have already told you, my, beloved brethren, let no man turn toward us. For what are we? or what are ye? What, but the Church of God which is known to all? And, if it please Him, in that Church are we; and those of us who by love abide in it, there let us persevere, if we would show the love we have. But then the apostle Paul, what evil are we to think of him? He not love the brethren! He not have within himself the testimony of his conscience in the sight of God! Paul not have within him that root of charity whence all good fruits proceeded! What madman would say this? Well then: where find we that the apostle asked and did not receive? He saith himself: “Lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, an angel of Satan to buffet me. For which thing I besought the Lord thrice, that He would take it from me. And He said unto me, My grace is sufficient for thee: for strength is made perfect in weakness.” Lo, he was not heard in his prayer that the “angel of Satan” should be taken from him. But wherefore? Because it was not good for him. He was heard, then, for salvation, when he was not heard according to his wish. Know, my beloved, a great mystery: which we urge upon your consideration on purpose that it may not slip from you in your temptations. The saints are in all things heard unto salvation: they are always heard in that which respects their eternal salvation; it is this that they desire: because in regard of this, their prayers are always heard.
Jam ergo dixi Charitati vestrae, fratres, nemo attendat ad nos. Quid enim sumus nos? Aut quid estis vos? Quid, nisi Ecclesia Dei, quae nota est omnibus? Et si illi placet, in illa sumus; et qui dilectione in illa manemus, ibi perseveremus, si volumus ostendere dilectionem quam habemus. Verumtamen de apostolo Paulo quid mali sensuri sumus? Ipse non diligebat fratres? Apud ipsum non erat testimonium conscientiae ejus in conspectu Dei? Non erat in Paulo radix illa charitatis, unde omnes boni fructus procedebant? Quis hoc demens dixerit? Ubi ergo invenimus petisse Apostolum et non accepisse? Ait ipse: In magnitudine revelationum ne extollar, datus est mihi stimulus carnis meae, angelus satanae, qui me colaphizet: propter quod ter Dominum rogavi ut auferret eum a me; et dixit mihi, Sufficit tibi gratia mea; nam virtus in infirmitate perficitur . Ecce non est exauditus, ut auferretur ab illo angelus satanae. Sed quare? Quia non ei proderat. Ergo e auditus est ad salutem, qui non est exauditus ad voluntatem. Noverit magnum sacramentum Charitas vestra; quod ideo commendamus vobis, ne excidat vobis in tentationibus vestris. Sancti ad salutem per omnia exaudiuntur, semper exaudiuntur ad salutem aeternam: ipsam desiderant; quia secundum hanc semper exaudiuntur.
6.7 PL 35, 2023
7. But let us distinguish God’s different ways of hearing prayer. For we find some not heard for their wish, heard for salvation: and again some we find heard for their wish, not heard for salvation. Mark this difference, hold fast this example of a man not heard for his wish but heard for salvation. Hear the apostle Paul; for what is the hearing of prayer unto salvation, God Himself showed him: “Sufficient for thee,” saith He, “is my grace; for strength is perfected in weakness.” Thou hast besought, hast cried, hast thrice cried: the very cry thou didst raise once for all I heard, I turned not away mine ears from thee; I know what I should do: thou wouldest have it taken away, the healing thing by which thou art burned; I know the infirmity by which thou art burdened. Well then: here is a man who was heard for salvation, while as to his will he was not heard. Where find we persons heard for their will, not heard for salvation? Do we find, think we, some wicked, some impious man, heard of God for his will, not heard for salvation? If I put to you the instance of some man, perchance thou wilt say to me, “It is thou that callest him wicked, for he was righteous; had he not been righteous, his prayer would not have been heard by God.” The instance I am about to allege is of one, of whose iniquity and impiety none can doubt. The devil himself: he asked for Job, and received. Have ye not here also heard concerning the devil, that “he that committeth sin is of the devil”? Not that the devil created, but that the sinner imitates. Is it not said of him, “He stood not in the truth”? Is not even he “that old serpent,” who, through the woman pledged the first man in the drink of poison? Who even in the case of Job, kept for him his wife, that by her the husband might be, not comforted, but tempted? The devil asked for a holy man, to tempt him; and he received: the apostle asked that the thorn in the flesh might be taken from him, and he received not. But the apostle was more heard than the devil. For the apostle was heard for salvation, though not for his wish: the devil was heard for his wish, but for damnation. For that Job was yielded up to him to be tempted, was in order that by his standing the proof the devil should be tormented. But this, my brethren, we find not only in the Old Testament books, but also in the Gospel. The demons besought the Lord, when He expelled them from the man, that they might be permitted to go into the swine. Should the Lord not have power to tell them not to approach even those creatures? For, had it not been His will to permit this, they were not about to rebel against the King of heaven and earth. But with a view to a certain mystery, with a certain ulterior meaning, He let the demons go into the swine: to show that the devil hath dominion in them that lead the life of swine. Demons then were heard in their request; was the apostle not heard? Or rather (what is truer) shall we say, The apostle was heard, the demons not heard? Their will was effected; his weal was perfected.
Sed discernamus exauditiones Dei. Invenimus enim quosdam non exauditos ad voluntatem, exauditos ad salutem: et rursus quosdam invenimus exauditos ad voluntatem, et non exauditos ad salutem. Hoc discernite, hoc tenete exemplum ejus qui non est exauditus ad voluntatem, sed exauditus ad salutem. Audi apostolum Paulum; nam ipsam exauditionem ad salutem ostendit illi Deus: Sufficit tibi, inquit, gratia mea; nam virtus in infirmitate perficitur. Rogasti, clamasti, ter clamasti: ipsum semel quod clamasti audivi, non averti aures meas a te; novi quid faciam: tu vis auferri medicamentum quo ureris; ego novi infirmitatem qua gravaris. Ergo iste ad salutem exauditus est, ad voluntatem non est exauditus. Quos invenimus exauditos ad voluntatem, non exauditos ad salutem? Invenimus, putamus, aliquem nequam, aliquem impium exauditum a Deo ad voluntatem, non exauditum ad salutem? Si alicujus hominis exemplum posuero, forte dicturus es mihi: Tu illum dicis iniquum, nam justus erat; si justus non esset, a Deo non exaudiretur. Talem propositurus sum, de cujus iniquitate et impietate nemo dubitet. Diabolus ipse petiit Job, et accepit . Nonne et hic de diabolo audistis quia qui facit peccatum, ex diabolo est ? Non quia ille creavit, sed quia iste imitatur. Nonne de illo dictum est, In veritate non stetit ? Nonne ipse est antiquus ille serpens qui per feminam venenum primo homini propinavit ? Qui et ipsi Job feminam propterea servavit, per quam maritus non consolaretur, sed tentaretur . Ipse diabolus petiit sanctum virum tentandum, et accepit: petiit Apostolus ut auferretur ab eo stimulus carnis, et non accepit. Sed Apostolus magis exauditus est quam diabolus. Apostolus enim est exauditus ad salutem, etsi non ad voluntatem: diabolus exauditus est ad voluntatem, sed ad damnationem. Ideo enim concessus est iste tentandus, ut eo probato esset ille cruciandus. Sed hoc, tratres, non tantum in veteribus Libris invenimus, sed et in Evangelio. Petierunt daemones a Domino, cum eos excluderet ab homine, ut ire permitterentur in porcos. Non eis posset dicere Dominus, ut nec illuc accederent? Non enim, si nollet, rebellaturi erant contra regem coeli et terrae. Certi tamen mysterii gratia et certa dispensatione dimisit daemones in porcos , ut ostenderet diabolum in eis dominari, qui vitam porcorum gerunt. Daemones ergo exauditi sunt, Apostolus non est exauditus? An potius quod verius est dicamus, I no Apostolus exauditus est, daemones non sunt exauditi? Illorum voluntas facta est, hujus sanitas perfecta est.
6.8 PL 35, 2024
8. Agreeably with this, we ought to understand that God, though He give not to our will, doth give for our salvation. For sup pose the thing thou have asked be to thine hurt, and the Physician knows that it is to thine hurt; what then? It is not to be said that the physician does not give ear to thee, when, perhaps, thou askest for cold water, and if it is good for thee, he gives it immediately, if not good, he gives it not. Had he no ears for thy request, or rather, did he give ear for thy weal, even when he gainsaid thy will? Then let there be in you charity, my brethren; let it be in you, and then set your minds at rest: even when the thing ye ask for is not given you, your prayer is granted, only, ye know it not. Many have been given into their own hands, to their own hurt: of whom the apostle saith, “God gave them up to their own hearts’ lusts.” Some man hath asked for a great sum of money; he hath received, to his hurt. When he had it not, he had little to fear; no sooner did he come to have it, than he became a prey to the more powerful. Was not that man’s request granted to his own hurt, who would needs have that for which he should be sought after by the robber, whereas, being poor, none sought after him? Learn to beseech God that ye may commit it to the Physician to do what He knows best. Do thou confess the disease, let Him apply the means of healing. Do thou only hold fast charity. For He will needs cut, will needs burn; what if thou criest out, and art not spared for thy crying under the cutting, under the burning and the tribulation, yet He knows how far the rottenness reaches. Thou wouldest have Him even now take off His hands, and He considers only the deepness of the sore; He knows how far to go. He does not attend to thee for thy will, but he does attend to thee for thy healing. Be ye sure, then, my brethren, that what the apostle saith is true: “For we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered: for He maketh intercession for the saints.” How is it said, “The Spirit itself intercedeth for the saints,” but as meaning the charity which is wrought in thee by the Spirit? For therefore saith the same apostle: “The charity of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Spirit which is given unto us.” It is charity that groans, it is charity that prays: against it He who gave it cannot shut His ears. Set your minds at rest: let charity ask, and the ears of God are there. Not that which thou wishest is done, but that is done which is advantageous. Therefore, “whatever we ask,” saith he, “we shall receive of Him,” I have already said, If thou understand it to mean, “for salvation,” there is no question: if not for salvation, there is a question, and a great one, a question that makes thee an accuser of the apostle Paul. “Whatever we ask, we receive of Him, because we keep His commandments, and do these things that are pleasing in His sight:” within, where He seeth.
Secundum hoc intelligere debemus quia Deus etsi voluntati nostrae non dat, saluti dat. Quid si enim hoc petieris quod tibi obest, et medicus novit quia obest tibi? Non enim non te exaudit medicus, quando forte tu frigidam aquam petis, et si prodest, statim dat; si non prodest, non dat. Non exaudivit, an potius ad sanitatem exaudivit, quia voluntati contradixit? Sit ergo in vobis charitas, fratres; sit in vobis, et securi estote: et quando non vobis datur quod petitis, exaudimini; sed nescitis. Multi dati sunt in manus suas malo suo: de quibus dicit Apostolus, Tradidit eos Deus in desideria cordis eorum . Petiit aliquis magnam pecuniam; accepit malo suo. Quando illam non habebat, parum timebat; habere illam coepit, praeda factus est potentiori. Nonne malo suo exauditus est, qui voluit habere unde a latrone quaereretur, quem pauperem nemo quaerebat? Discite rogare Deum, ut medico committatis, quod ipse novit faciat. Tu morbum confitearis, ille medicamentum adhibeat. Tu tantum charitatem tene. Nam ille secare vult, urere vult; tu si clamas, et non exaudiris in sectione, in ustione et tribulatione, novit ille quousque putre est. Tu jam vis revocet manus, et ille vulneris sinum attendit; scit quo usque perveniat. Non te exaudit ad voluntatem, sed exaudit ad sanitatem. Certi ergo estote, fratres mei, quia quod ait Apostolus verum est: Quid enim oremus, sicut oportet, nescimus; sed ipse Spiritus interpellat gemitibus inenarrabilibus, quia ipse interpellat pro sanctis . Quid est, Ipse Spiritus interpellat pro sanctis, nisi, ipsa Charitas quae in te per Spiritum facta est? Ideo enim dicit idem apostolus: Charitas Dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris per Spiritum sanctum qui datus est nobis . Charitas ipsa gemit, charitas ipsa orat; contra hanc aures claudere non novit qui illam dedit. Securus esto, charitas roget; et ibi sunt aures Dei. Non fit quod vis, sed fit quod expedit. Ergo quidquid postulaverimus, inquit, accipiemus ab eo. Jam dixi, si ad salutem intelligas, nulla quaestio est: si non ad salutem, quaestio est, et magna, quae te calumniatorem facit Paulo apostolo. Quidquid postulaverimus, accipiemus ab eo; quia mandata ejus servamus, et quae placent illi, in conspectu ejus facimus. In conspectu ejus, intus ubi videt.
6.9 PL 35, 2024
9. And what are those commandments? “This,” saith he, “is His commandment, That we should believe on the name of His Son Jesus Christ, and love one another.” Ye see that this is the commandment: ye see that whoso doeth aught against this commandment, doeth the sin from which “every one that is born of God” is free. “As He gave us commandment:” that we love one another. “And he that keepeth His commandment”—ye see that none other thing is bidden us than that we love one another—“And he that keepeth His commandment shall abide in Him, and He in him.” “And in this we know that He abideth in us, by the Spirit which He hath given us. Is it not manifest that this is what the Holy Ghost works in man, that there should be in him love and charity? Is it not manifest, as the Apostle Paul saith, that “the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost which is given us”? For [our apostle] was speaking of charity, and was saying that we ought in the sight of God to interrogate our own heart. “But if our heart think not ill of us:” i.e. if it confess that from the love of our brother is done in us whatever is done in any good work. And then besides, in speaking of the commandment, he says this: “This is His commandment, That we should believe on the name of His Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as He gave us commandment.” “And he that doeth His commandment abideth in Him, and He in him. In this we know that He abideth in us, by the Spirit which He hath given us.” If in truth thou find that thou hast charity, thou hast the Spirit of God in order to understand: for a very necessary thing it is.
Et quae illa mandata sunt? Hoc est, inquit, mandatum illius, ut credamus nomini Filii ejus Jesu Christi, et diligamus invicem. Videtis quia hoc est mandatum, videtis quia contra hoc mandatum qui facit, peccatum facit, quo caret omnis qui natus est ex Deo. Sicut dedit nobis mandatum: ut diligamus invicem. Et qui servaverit mandatum ejus: videtis quia nihil aliud nobis praecipitur, nisi ut diligamus invicem: Et qui servaverit mandatum ejus, in ipso manebit, et ipse in eo. Et in hoc cognoscimus quia manet in nobis de Spiritu quem dedit nobis. Nonne manifestum est quia hoc agit Spiritus sanctus in homine, ut sit in illo dilectio et charitas? Nonne manifestum est quod ait apostolus Paulus: Charitas Dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris per Spiritum sanctum qui datus est nobis? De charitate enim loquebatur, et dicebat quia in conspectu Dei debemus interrogare cor nostrum. Quod si non male senserit cor nostrum: id est, si confiteatur quia de dilectione fratris fit, quidquid fit in bono opere. Accessit etiam quod de mandato cum diceret, hoc ait: Hoc est mandatum ejus, ut credamus nomini Filii ejus Jesu Christi, et diligamus invicem. Et qui facit mandatum ejus, in ipso manet, et ipse in eo. In hoc cognoscimus quia manet in nobis de Spiritu quem dedit nobis. Si enim inveneris te habere charitatem, habes Spiritum Dei ad intelligendum: valde enim necessaria res est.
6.10 PL 35, 2025
10. In the earliest times, “the Holy Ghost fell upon them that believed: and they spake with tongues,” which they had not learned, “as the Spirit gave them utterance.” These were signs adapted to the time. For there behooved to be that betokening of the Holy Spirit in all tongues, to shew that the Gospel of God was to run through all tongues over the whole earth. That thing was done for a betokening, and it passed away. In the laying on of hands now, that persons may receive the Holy Ghost, do we look that they should speak with tongues? Or when we laid the hand on these infants, did each one of you look to see whether they would speak with tongues, and, when he saw that they did not speak with tongues, was any of you so wrong-minded as to say, These have not received the Holy Ghost; for, had they received, they would speak with tongues as was the case in those times? If then the witness of the presence of the Holy Ghost be not now given through these miracles, by what is it given, by what does one get to know that he has received the Holy Ghost? Let him question his own heart. If he love his brother the Spirit of God dwelleth in him. Let him see, let him prove himself before the eyes of God, let him see whether there be in him the love of peace and unity, the love of the Church that is spread over the whole earth. Let him not rest only in his loving the brother whom he has before his eyes, for we have many brethren whom we do not see, and in the unity of the Spirit we are joined to them. What marvel that they are not with us? We are in one body, we have one Head, in heaven. Brethren, our two eyes do not see each other; as one may say, they do not know each other. But in the charity of the bodily frame do they not know each other? For, to shew you that in the charity which knits them together they do know each other; when both eyes are open, the right may not rest on some object, on which the left shall not rest likewise. Direct the glance of the right eye without the other, if thou canst. Together they meet in one object, together they are directed to one object: their aim is one, their places diverse. If then all who with thee love God have one aim with thee, heed not that in the body thou are separated in place; the eyesight of the heart ye have alike fixed on the light of truth. Then if thou wouldest know that thou hast received the Spirit, question thine heart: lest haply thou have the sacrament, and have not the virtue of the sacrament. Question thine heart. If love of thy brethren be there, set thy mind at rest. There cannot be love without the Spirit of God: since Paul cries, “The love of God is shed abroad in your hearts by the Holy Spirit which is given unto us.”
Primis temporibus cadebat super credentes Spiritus sanctus; et loquebantur linguis quas non didicerant, quomodo Spiritus dabat eis pronuntiare. Signa erant tempori opportuna. Oportebat enim ita significari in omnibus linguis Spiritum sanctum, quia Evangelium Dei per omnes linguas cursurum erat toto orbe terrarum. Significatum est illud, et transiit. Numquid modo quibus imponitur manus ut accipiant Spiritum sanctum, hoc exspectatur, ut linguis loquantur? Aut quando imposuimus manum istis infantibus, attendit unusquisque vestrum utrum linguis loquerentur; et cum videret eos linguis non loqui, ita perverso corde aliquis vestrum fuit ut diceret: Non acceperunt isti Spiritum sanctum; nam si accepissent, linguis loquerentur quemadmodum tunc factum est? Si ergo per haec miracula non fiat modo testimonium praesentiae Spiritus sancti; unde fit, unde cognoscit quisque accepisse se Spiritum sanctum? Interroget cor suum: si diligit fratrem, manet Spiritus Dei in illo. Videat, probet seipsum coram oculis Dei; videat si est in illo dilectio pacis et unitatis, dilectio Ecclesiae toto terrarum orbe diffusae. Non attendat eum solum diligere fratrem quem attendit ante se: multos enim non videmus fratres nostros, et in unitate Spiritus illis copulamur. Quid mirum quia nobiscum non sunt? In uno corpore sumus, unum caput habemus in coelo. Fratres, oculi nostri non se vident, quasi non se norunt. An in charitate compaginis corporalis non norunt se? Nam, ut noveritis quia in conjunctione charitatis se norunt: quando ambo patent, non licet ut aliquid attendat dexter, quod non attendat sinister. Dirige radium dextrum sine altero, si potes. Simul coeunt, simul diriguntur; intentio una est, loca diversa sunt. Si ergo omnes qui tecum diligunt Deum, unam intentionem tecum habent, noli attendere quia corpore in loco separatus es; aciem cordis simul fixistis in lumine veritatis. Ergo si vis nosse quia accepisti Spiritum, interroga cor tuum; ne forte sacramentum habes, et virtutem sacramenti non habes. Interroga cor tuum, si est ibi dilectio fratris, securus esto. Non potest esse dilectio sine Spiritu Dei: quia Paulus clamat, Charitas Dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris per Spiritum sanctum qui datus est nobis.
6.11 PL 35, 2026
11. “Beloved, believe not every spirit.” Because he had said, “In this we know that He abideth in us, by the Spirit which He hath given us.” But how this same Spirit is known, mark this: “Beloved, believe not every spirit, but prove the spirits whether they be from God.” And who is he that proves the spirits? A hard matter has he put to us, my brethren! It is well for us that he should tell us himself how we are to discern them. He is about to tell us: fear not: but first see; mark: see that hereby is expressed the very thing that vain heretics taunt us withal. Mark, see what he says, “Beloved, believe not every spirit, but prove the spirits whether they be from God.” The Holy Spirit is spoken of in the Gospel by the name of water; where the Lord “cried and said, If any man thirst, let him come unto me, and drink. He that believeth on me, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.” But the evangelist has expounded of what He said this: for he goes on to say, “But this spake He of the Spirit, which they that believed on Him should receive.” Wherefore did not the Lord baptize many? But what saith he? “For the Holy Ghost was not yet given; because that Jesus was not yet glorified.” Then seeing those had baptism, and had not yet received the Holy Ghost, whom on the day of Pentecost the Lord sent from heaven, the glorifying of the Lord was first waited for, so that the Spirit might be given. Even before He was glorified, and before He sent the Spirit, He yet invited men to prepare themselves for the receiving of the water of which He said, “Whoso thirsteth, let him come and drink;” and, “He that believeth on me, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.” What meaneth, “Rivers of living water”? What is that water? Let no man ask me; ask the Gospel. “But this,” saith it, “He said of the Spirit, which they should receive that should believe on Him.” Consequently, the water of the sacrament is one thing: another, the water which betokens the Spirit of God. The water of the sacrament is visible: the water of the Spirit invisible. That washes the body, and betokens that which is done in the soul. By this Spirit the soul itself is cleansed and fed. This is the Spirit of God, which heretics and all that cut themselves off from the Church, cannot have. And whosoever do not openly cut themselves off, but by iniquity are cut off, and being within, whirl about as chaff and are not grain; these have not this Spirit. This Spirit is denoted by the Lord under the name of water: and we have heard from this epistle, “Believe not every spirit;” and those words of Solomon bear witness, “From strange water keep thee far.” What meaneth, “water”? Spirit. Does water always signify spirit? Not always: but in some places it signifies the Spirit, in some places it signifies baptism, in some places signifies peoples, in some places signifies counsel: thus thou findest it said in a certain place, “Counsel is a fountain of life to them that possess it.” So then, in divers places of the Scriptures, the term “water” signifies divers things. Now however by the term water ye have heard the Holy Spirit spoken of, not by an interpretation of ours but by witness of the Gospel, where it saith, “But this said He of the Spirit, which they should receive that should believe on Him.” If then by the name of water is signified the Holy Spirit, and this epistle saith to us, “Believe not every spirit, but prove the spirits, whether they be of God;” let us understand that of this it is said, “From strange water keep thee far, and from a strange fountain drink thou not.” What meaneth, “From a strange fountain drink thou not”? A strange spirit believe thou not.
Dilectissimi, nolite omni spiritui credere. Quia dixerat, In hoc cognoscimus quia manet in nobis de Spiritu quem dedit nobis. Unde autem cognoscitur ipse Spiritus attendite: Dilectissimi, nolite omni spiritui credere, sed probate spiritus si ex Deo sunt. Et quis est qui probat spiritus? Difficilem rem nobis proposuit, fratres mei: bonum est nobis ut dicat ipse unde discernamus. Dicturus est; ne formidetis: sed primo videte, attendite; videte hinc exprimi illud unde vani haeretici calumniantur. Attendite, videte quid ait, Dilectissimi, nolite omni spiritui credere, sed probate spiritus si ex Deo sunt. Spiritus sanctus nomine aquae appellatus est in Evangelio, Domino clamante et dicente: Si quis sitit, veniat ad me, et bibat: qui credit in me, flumina aquae vivae fluent de ventre ejus. Evangelista autem exposuit unde diceret: secutus enim ait, Hoc autem dicebat de Spiritu quem accepturi erant qui in eum erant credituri. Quare non multos baptizavit Dominus? Sed quid ait? Spiritus autem nondum erat datus, quia Jesus nondum erat clarificatus . Quia ergo illi Baptismum habebant, et Spiritum sanctum nondum acceperant, quem die Pentecostes misit Dominus de coelo; ut daretur Spiritus, exspectabatur clarificatio Domini. Et antequam clarificaretur, et antequam mitteret eum, invitabat tamen homines ut se praepararent ad accipiendam aquam, de qua dixit, Qui sitit, veniat et bibat; et, Qui credit in me, flumina aquae vivae fluent de ventre ejus. Quid est, flumina aquae vivae? quid est illa aqua? Nemo me interroget; Evangelium interroga. Hoc autem dicebat, ait, de Spiritu quem accepturi erant hi qui in eum erant credituri. Aliud est ergo aqua Sacramenti, aliud aqua quae significat Spiritum Dei. Aqua Sacramenti visibilis est; aqua Spiritus invisibilis. Ista abluit corpus, et significat quod fit in anima: per illum Spiritum ipsa anima mundatur et saginatur. Ipse est Spiritus Dei, quem non possunt habere haeretici, et quicumque se ab Ecclesia praecidunt. Et quicumque non aperte praecidunt, sed per iniquitatem praecisi sunt, et intus tanquam paleae volvuntur, et grana non sunt, non habent istum Spiritum. Iste Spiritus nomine aquae a Domino significatus est: et audivimus ab hac Epistola, Nolite omni spiritui credere; et testantur verba illa Salomonis, Ab aqua aliena abstine te. Quid est aqua? Spiritus. Numquid semper aqua Spiritum significat? Non semper: sed quibusdam locis Spiritum significat, quibusdam locis Baptismum significat, quibusdam locis populos significat, quibusdam locis consilium significat. Habes quodam loco dictum, Fons vitae consilium, possidentibus eum . Ergo per diversa loca Scripturarum nomen aquae diversa significat. Nunc tamen nomine aquae Spiritum sanctum audistis, non ex interpretatione nostra, sed ex Evangelico testimonio, ubi ait: Hoc autem dicebat de Spiritu quem erant accepturi hi qui in eum erant credituri. Si ergo aquae nomine significatur Spiritus sanctus, et dicit nobis Epistola ista, Nolite omni spiritui credere, sed probate spiritus si ex Deo sunt; intelligamus inde dictum esse, Ab aqua aliena abstine te, et de fonte alieno ne biberis . Quid est, de fonte alieno ne biberis? Spiritui alieno ne credideris.
6.12 PL 35, 2027
12. There remains then the test by which it is to be proved to be the Spirit of God. He has indeed set down a sign, and this, belike, difficult: let us see, however. We are to recur to that charity; it is that which teacheth us, because it is the unction. However, what saith he here? “Prove the spirits, whether they be from God: because many false prophets have gone out into this world.” Now there are all heretics and all schismatics. How then am I to prove the spirit? He goes on: “In this is known the Spirit of God.” Wake up the ears of your heart. We were at a loss; we were saying, Who knows? who discerns? Behold, he is about to tell the sign. “Hereby is known the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God: and every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is the antichrist, of whom ye have heard that he should come; and even now already is he in this world.” Our ears, so to say, are on the alert for discerning of the spirits; and we have been told something, such that thereby we discern not a whit the more. For what saith he? “Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ came in the flesh, is of God.” Then is the spirit that is among the heretics, of God, seeing they “confess that Jesus Christ came in the flesh”? Aye, here perchance they lift themselves up against us, and say: Ye have not the Spirit from God; but we confess “that Jesus Christ came in the flesh:” but the apostle here hath said that those have not the Spirit of God, who confess not “that Jesus Christ came in the flesh.” Ask the Arians: they confess “that Jesus Christ came in the flesh:” ask the Eunomians; they confess “that Jesus Christ came in the flesh:” ask the Macedonians; they confess “that Jesus Christ came in the flesh:” put the question to the Cataphryges; they confess “that Jesus Christ came in the flesh:” put it to the Novatians; they confess “that Jesus Christ came in the flesh.” Then have all these heresies the Spirit of God? Are they then no false prophets? Is there then no deception there, no seduction there? Assuredly they are antichrists; for “they went out from us, but were not of us.”
Restat ergo examen, unde probetur quia Spiritus Dei est. Posuit quidem signum, et hoc fortasse difficile; videamus tamen. Ad illam charitatem redituri sumus; ipsa est quae nos docet, quia ipsa est unctio. Tamen hic quid ait? Probate spiritus si ex Deo sunt: quia multi pseudoprophetae exierunt in istum mundum. Jam ibi sunt omnes haeretici et omnes schismatici. Quomodo ergo probo spiritum? Sequitur, In hoc cognoscitur Spiritus Dei. Erigite aures cordis. Laborabamus, et dicebamus, Quis novit? quis discernit? Ecce dicturus est signum. « In hoc cognoscitur Spiritus Dei: omnis spiritus qui confitetur Jesum Christum in carne venisse, ex Deo est. Et omnis spiritus qui non confitetur Jesum Christum in carne venisse, non est ex Deo: et hic est antichristus, de quo audistis quod venturus sit; et nunc in isto mundo est. » Quasi eriguntur aures ad discernendos spiritus; et tale quiddam audivimus, unde nihilominus non discernamus. Quid enim ait? Omnis spiritus qui confitetur Jesum Christum in carne venisse, ex Deo est. Ergo spiritus qui est apud haereticos, ex Deo est; quia confitentur Jesum Christum in carne venisse? Jam hic erigunt se forte adversus nos, et dicunt: Vos non habetis spiritum ex Deo; sed nos confitemur Jesum Christum in carne venisse: iste autem illos negavit Spiritum Dei habere, qui non confitentur Jesum Christum in carne venisse. Quaere ab Arianis; confitentur Jesum Christum in carne venisse: quaere ab Eunomianis; confitentur Jesum Christum in carne venisse: quaere a Macedonianis; confitentur Jesum Christum in carne venisse: interroga Cataphrygas; confitentur Jesum Christum in carne venisse: interroga Novatianos; confitentur Jesum Christum in carne venisse. Omnes ergo istae haereses Spiritum Dei habent? Non ergo pseudoprophetae sunt? nulla est ergo ibi deceptio, nulla est ibi seductio? Certe antichristi sunt, qui ex nobis exierunt, sed non erant ex nobis.
6.13 PL 35, 2027
13. What are we to do then? By what to discern them? Be very attentive; let us go together in heart, and knock. Charity herself keeps watch; for it is none other than she that shall knock, she also that shall open: anon ye shall understand in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. Already ye have heard that it was said above, “Whoso denieth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh, the same is an antichrist.” There also we asked, Who denies? because neither do we deny, nor do those deny. And we found that some do in their deeds deny; and we brought testimony from the apostle, who saith, “For they confess that they know God, but in their deeds deny Him.” Thus then let us now also make the enquiry in the deeds not in the tongue. What is the spirit that is not from God? That “which denieth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh.” And what is the spirit that is from God? That “which confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh.” Who is he that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh? Now, brethren, to the mark! let us look to the works, not stop at the noise of the tongue. Let us ask why Christ came in the flesh, so we get at the persons who deny that He is come in the flesh. If thou stop at tongues, why, thou shalt hear many a heresy confessing that Christ is come in the flesh: but the truth convicteth those men. Wherefore came Christ in the flesh? Was He not God? Is it not written of Him, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God?” Was it not He that did feed angels, is it not He that doth feed angels? Did He not in such sort come hither, that He departed not thence? Did He not in such sort ascend, that He forsook not us? Wherefore then came He in the flesh? Because it behooved us to have the hope of resurrection shown unto us. God He was, and in flesh He came; for God could not die, flesh could die; He came then in the flesh, that He might die for us. But how died He for us? “Greater charity than this hath no man, that a man lay down his life for his friends.” Charity therefore brought Him to the flesh. Whoever therefore has not charity denies that Christ is come in the flesh. Here then do thou now question all heretics. Did Christ come in the flesh? “He did come; this I believe, this I confess.” Nay, this thou deniest. “How do I deny? Thou hearest that I say it!” Nay, I convict thee of denying it. Thou sayest with the voice, deniest with the heart; sayest in words, deniest in deeds. “How,” sayest thou, “do I deny in deeds?” Because the end for which Christ came in the flesh, was, that He might die for us. He died for us, because therein He taught much charity. “Greater charity than this hath no man, that a man lay down his life for his friends.” Thou hast not charity, seeing thou for thine own honor dividest unity. Therefore by this understand ye the spirit that is from God. Give the earthen vessels a tap, put them to the proof, whether haply they be cracked and give a dull sound: see whether they ring full and clear, see whether charity be there. Thou takest thyself away from the unity of the whole earth, thou dividest the Church by schisms, thou rendest the Body of Christ. He came in the flesh, to gather in one, thou makest an outcry to scatter abroad. This then is the Spirit of God, which saith that Jesus is come in the flesh, which saith, not in tongue but in deeds, which saith, not by making a noise but by loving. And that spirit is not of God, which denies that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh; denies, here also, not in tongue but in life; not in words but in deeds. It is manifest therefore by what we may know the brethren. Many within are in a sort within; but none without except he be indeed without.
Quid ergo facimus? unde discernimus? Intendite; eamus simul corde, et pulsemus. Vigilat ipsa charitas, quia ipsa pulsatura est, ipsa apertura: modo intelligetis in nomine Domini nostri Jesu Christi. Jam superius audistis quia dictum est, Qui negat Jesum Christum in carne venisse, hic est antichristus . Et ibi quaesivimus, quis neget; quia nec nos negamus, nec illi negant. Et invenimus quosdam factis negare ; et adhibuimus testimonium de Apostolo, qui ait, Confitentur enim se nosse Deum, factis autem negant . Sic ergo et modo quaeramus in factis, non in lingua. Quis est spiritus qui non est ex Deo? Qui negat Jesum Christum in carne venisse. Et quis est spiritus qui est ex Deo? Qui confitetur Jesum Christum in carne venisse. Quis est qui confitetur Jesum Christum in carne venisse? Eia, fratres, opera attendamus, non strepitum linguae. Quaeramus quare venerit in carne Christus, et invenimus qui eum negant in carne venisse. Nam si linguas attendas, multas haereses auditurus es confitentes Christum in carne venisse: sed convincit illos veritas. Quare venit Christus in carne? Nonne Deus erat? Nonne de illo scriptum est, In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum ? Nonne ipse pascebat Angelos, et ipse pascit Angelos? Nonne sic huc venit, ut inde non recederet? Nonne sic ascendit, ut nos non dimitteret? Quare ergo venit in carne? Quia oportebat nobis ostendi spem resurrectionis. Deus erat, et in carne venit; Deus enim mori non poterat, caro mori poterat; ideo ergo venit in carne, ut moreretur pro nobis. Quemadmodum autem mortuus est pro nobis? Majorem hac charitatem nemo habet, quam ut animam suam ponat pro amicis suis . Charitas ergo illum adduxit ad carnem. Quisquis ergo non habet charitatem, negat Christum in carne venisse. Hic nunc jam interroga omnes haereticos, Christus venit in carne? Venit; hoc credo, hoc confiteor. Imo hoc negas. Unde nego? audis quia hoc dico. Imo ego convinco quia negas. Dicis voce, negas corde; dicis verbis, negas factis. Quomodo, inquis, nego factis? Quia ideo venit in carne Christus, ut moreretur pro nobis. Ideo mortuus est pro nobis, quia charitatem multam docuit: Majorem hac charitatem nemo habet, quam ut animam suam ponat pro amicis suis. Tu non habes charitatem; quia pro honore tuo dividis unitatem. Ergo hinc intelligite spiritum ex Deo. Pulsate, tangite vasa fictilia, ne forte crepuerint et male resonent: videte si integre sonant, videte si ibi est charitas. Tollis te ab unitate orbis terrarum, dividis Ecclesiam per schismata, dilanias corpus Christi. Ille venit in carne, ut colligat: tu ideo clamas, ut spargas. Ergo ipse est Spiritus Dei, qui dicit Jesum in carne venisse: qui dicit non lingua, sed factis; qui dicit non sonando, sed amando. Ille autem non est spiritus Dei, qui negat Jesum Christum in carne venisse: negat et ipse non lingua, sed vita; non verbis, sed factis. Manifestum est ergo unde cognoscamus fratres. Multi intus, quasi intus sunt; nemo autem foris, nisi vere foris.
6.14 PL 35, 2028
14. Nay, and that ye may know that he has referred the matter to deeds, he saith, “And every spirit, qui solvit Christum, which does away with Christ that He came in the flesh, is not of God.” A doing away in deeds is meant. What has he shown thee? “That denieth:” in that he saith, “doeth away” (or, “unmaketh”). He came to gather in one, thou comest to unmake. Thou wouldest pull Christ’s members asunder. How can it be said that thou deniest not that Christ is come in the flesh, who rendest assunder the Church of God which He hath gathered together? Therefore thou goest against Christ; thou art an antichrist. Be thou within, or be thou without, thou art an antichrist: only, when thou art within, thou art hidden; when thou art without, thou art made manifest. Thou unmakest Jesus and deniest that He came in the flesh; thou art not of God. Therefore He saith in the Gospel: “Whoso shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven.” What is this breaking? What this teaching? A breaking in the deeds and a teaching as it were in words. “Thou that preachest men should not steal, dost thou steal?” Therefore he that steals breaks or undoes the commandment in his deed, and as it were teaches so: “he shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven,” i.e. in the Church of this present time. Of him it is said, “What they say do ye; but what they do, that do not ye. But he that shall do, and shall teach so, shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.” From this, that He has here said, fecerit, “shall do,” while in opposition to this He has there said solverit, meaning non fecerit, “shall not do, and shall teach so”—to break, then, is, not to do—what doth He teach us, but that we should interrogate men’s deeds, not take their words upon trust? The obscurity of the things compels us to speak much at length, chiefly that that which the Lord deigns to reveal may be brought within reach even of the brethren of slower understanding, because all were bought by the blood of Christ. And I am afraid the epistle itself will not be finished during these days as I promised: but as the Lord will, it is better to reserve the remainder, than to overload your hearts with too much food.
Adeo ut noveritis quia ad facta retulit, Et omnis spiritus, ait, qui solvit Christum, in carne venisse, non est ex Deo. Solvere factis intelligitur. Quid tibi ostendit? qui negat; quia dixit, solvit. Ille venit colligere, tu venis solvere. Distringere vis membra Christi. Quomodo non negas Christum in carne venisse, qui disrumpis Ecclesiam Dei, quam ille congregavit? Contra Christum ergo venis; antichristus es. Intus sis, foris sis; antichristus es: sed quando intus es, lates, quando foris es, manifestaris. Solvis Jesum, et negas eum in carne venisse; non es ex Deo. Ideo dicit in Evangelio: Qui solverit unum de mandatis istis minimis, et docuerit sic, minimus vocabitur in regno coelorum. Quid est, solvitur? quid est, docetur? Solvitur factis, et docetur quasi verbis. Qui praedicas non furandum, furaris . Solvit ergo in facto qui furatur, et quasi docet sic; minimus vocabitur in regno coelorum, id est, in Ecclesia hujus temporis. De illo dictum est, Quae dicunt facite; quae autem faciunt, facere nolite . Qui autem fecerit, et sic docuerit, magnus vocabitur in regno coelorum . Ex eo quod dixit hic, fecerit, contra hoc ibi dixit, solverit, id est, non fecerit, et docuerit sic. Ille ergo solvit qui non facit. Quid nos docet, nisi ut facta interrogemus, non verba credamus? Obscuritas rerum multa nos cogit dicere: maxime ut illud quod Dominus revelare dignatur, etiam ad tardiores fratres perveniat; quia omnes Christi sanguine comparati sunt. Et vereor ne ipsa Epistola istis diebus, sicut promiseram, non finiatur: sed quod Domino placet, melius est servare reliquias, quam onerare corda nimio cibo.