Sermons on Selected Lessons of the New Testament 32

sant'Agostino d'Ippona (354–430 d.C.) · Sermones de Scripturis · PL 38, 332–799

32.0 On the words of the Gospel, Matt. xviii. 15, ‘If thy brother sin against thee, go, shew him his fault between thee and him alone;’ and of the words of Solomon, he that winketh with the eyes deceitfully, heapeth sorrow upon men; but he that reproveth openly, maketh peace PL 38, 506

[LXXXII. Ben.]

On the words of the Gospel, Matt. xviii. 15, “If thy brother sin against thee, go, shew him his fault between thee and him alone;” and of the words of Solomon, he that winketh with the eyes deceitfully, heapeth sorrow upon men; but he that reproveth openly, maketh peace.

32.1 On the words of the Gospel, Matt. xviii. 15, ‘If thy brother sin against thee, go, shew him his fault between thee and him alone;’ and of the words of Solomon, he that winketh with the eyes deceitfully, heapeth sorrow upon men; but he that reproveth openly, maketh peace PL 38, 506

1. Our Lord warns us not to neglect one another’s sins, not by searching out what to find fault with, but by looking out for what to amend. For He said that his eye is sharp to cast out a mote out of his brother’s eye, who has not a beam in his own eye. Now what this means, I will briefly convey to you, Beloved. A mote in the eye is anger; a beam in the eye is hatred. When therefore one who has hatred finds fault with one who is angry, he wishes to take a mote out of his brother’s eye, but is hindered by the beam which he carries in his own eye. A mote is the beginning of a beam. For a beam in the course of its growth, is first a mote. By watering the mote, you bring it to a beam; by nourishing anger with evil suspicions, you bring it on to hatred.

Observatio praevia. Festuca, ira; trabes, odium. Admonet nos Dominus noster non negligere invicem nostra peccata, non quaerendo quid reprehendas, sed videndo quid corrigas. Ejus quippe dixit acutum oculum ad ejiciendam festucam de oculo fratris sui, qui trabem in oculo suo non habet. Quid autem hoc sit, breviter insinuo Charitati vestrae. Festuca in oculo, ira est: trabes in oculo, odium est. Quando ergo qui odit reprehendit irascentem, festucam vult de oculo fratris sui tollere: sed trabe impeditur, quam ipse portat in oculo suo . Festuca initium trabis est. Nam trabes quando nascitur, prius festuca est. Rigando festucam, perducis ad trabem: alendo iram malis suspicionibus, perducis ad odium.

32.2 PL 38, 506

2. Now there is a great difference between the sin of one who is angry, and the cruelty of one who holds another in hatred. For even with our children are we angry; but who is ever found to hate his children? Among the very cattle too, the cow in a sort of weariness will sometimes in anger drive away her sucking calf; but anon she embraces it with all the affection of a mother. She is in a way disgusted with it, when she butts at it; yet when she misses it, she will seek after it. Nor do we discipline our children otherwise, than with a degree of anger and indignation; yet we should not discipline them at all, but in love to them. So far then is every one who is angry from hating; that sometimes one would be rather convicted of hating, if he were not angry. For suppose a child wishes to play in some river’s stream, by whose force he would be like to perish; if you see this, and patiently suffer it, this would be hating; your patient suffering him, is his death. How far better is it to be angry and correct him, than by not being angry to suffer him to perish! Above all things then is hatred to be avoided, and the beam to be cast out of the eye. Great is the difference indeed between one’s exceeding due limits in some words through anger, which he afterwards wipes off by repenting of it; and the keeping an insidious purpose shut up in the heart. Great, lastly, the difference between these words of Scripture; “Mine eye is disordered because of anger.” Whereas of the other it is said, “Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer.” Great is the difference between an eye disordered, and clean put out. A mote disorders, a beam puts clean out.

Peccatum irascentis: crudelitas odio habentis. Multum autem interest inter peccatum irascentis, et crudelitatem odio habentis. Nam et filiis nostris irascimur: odisse filios quis invenitur? In ipsis quoque pecoribus mater aliquando bucula sugentem vitulum taedio quodam avertit irascens: sed visceribus amplectitur matris. Quasi taedium facit, cum impingit: quaeritur tamen, si deest. Nec damus aliter filiis disciplinam, nisi aliquantum irascendo et indignando: nec tamen daremus disciplinam, nisi amando. Usque adeo non omnis qui irascitur, odit; ut aliquando magis odisse convincatur, si non irascitur. Fac enim puerum velle in aqua fluminis ludere, cujus impetu pereat: tu si vides, et patienter permittis, odisti; tua patientia, illius mors est. Quanto melius est si irasceris et corrigis, quam non irascendo interire permittis? Odium ergo ante omnia vitandum est, trabes de oculo ejicienda est. Multum quippe aliud est, quando quisque irascens in aliquo verbi modum excedit, quod postea deleat poenitendo; et aliud est, servare insidias inclusas in corde. Multum postremo interest inter haec verba Scripturae, Turbatus est prae ira oculus meus . De illo autem quid dictum est? Qui odit fratrem suum, homicida est . Multum interest inter turbatum oculum, et exstinctum. Festuca turbat, trabes exstinguit.

32.3 PL 38, 507

3. In order then that we may be able well to do and to fulfil what we have been admonished of to-day, let us first persuade ourselves to this, above all things to have no hate. For when there is no beam in thine own eye, thou seest rightly whatever may be in thy brother’s eye; and art uneasy, till thou cast out of thy brother’s eye what thou seest to hurt it. The light that is in thee, doth not allow thee to neglect thy brother’s light. Whereas if thou hate, and wouldest correct him, how dost thou improve his light, when thou hast lost thine own light? For the same Scripture, where it is written, “Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer,” hath expressly told us this also. “He that hateth his brother is in darkness even until now.” Hatred then is darkness. Now it cannot but be, that he who hateth another, should first injure himself. For him he endeavours to hurt outwardly, he lays himself waste inwardly. Now in proportion as our soul is of more value than our body, so much the more ought we to provide for it, that it be not hurt. But he that hateth another, doth hurt his own soul. And what would he do to him whom he hateth? What would he do? He takes away his money, can he take his faith away? he wounds his good fame, can he wound his conscience? Whatever injury he does, is but external; now observe what his injury to himself is? For he who hateth another is an enemy to himself within. But because he is not sensible of what harm he is doing to himself, he is violent against another, and that the more dangerously, that he is not sensible of the evil he is doing to himself; because by this very violence he has lost the power of perception. Thou art violent against thine enemy; by this violence of thine he is spoiled, and thou art wicked. Great is the difference between the two. He hath lost his money, thou thine innocence. Ask which hath suffered the heavier loss? He hath lost a thing that was sure to perish, and thou art become one who must now perish thyself.

Odium ei qui odit gravius nocet, quam alteri. Hoc ergo primum nobis persuadeamus, ut quod hodie admoniti sumus, bene facere atque implere possimus, ante omnia non odisse. Tunc enim quando trabes non est in oculo tuo, vides recte quidquid fuerit in oculo fratris tui; et vim pateris, donec ejicias de oculo fratris tui, quod vides nocere oculo fratris tui. Lumen quod in te est, non te permittit negligere lumen fratris tui. Nam si odisti, et vis corripere, quomodo emendas lumen, qui perdidisti lumen? Dixit enim et hoc aperte eadem Scriptura, ubi scriptum est, Qui odit fratrem suum, homicida est. Qui odit, inquit, fratrem suum, in tenebris est usque adhuc . Odium, tenebrae sunt. Non potest autem fieri ut qui odit alterum, non sibi prius noceat. Illum enim laedere conatur extrinsecus, se vastat intrinsecus. Quantum autem animus noster corpore major est, tantum ei prospicere debemus, ne ipse laedatur. Laedit autem animum suum, qui odit alterum. Et quid facturus est ei quem odit? quid facturus? Tollit pecuniam, numquid fidem? Laedit famam, numquid conscientiam? Quidquid nocet, forinsecus nocet: sibi attende quid noceat. Intus enim sibi ipse inimicus est, qui odit alterum. Sed quia non sentit quid sibi mali faciat, in alterum saevit, eo periculosius vivens, quo non sentit quid secum mali agit; quia et saeviendo sensum perdidit. Saevisti in inimicum tuum: te saeviente ille nudatus est, tu iniquus es. Multum interest inter nudum et iniquum. Ille perdidit pecuniam, tu innocentiam. Quaere quis gravius damnum perpessus est. Ille perdidit rem perituram, tu factus es periturus.

32.4 PL 38, 507

4. Therefore ought we to rebuke in love; not with any eager desire to injure, but with an earnest care to amend. If we be so minded, most excellently do we practise that which we have been recommended to-day; “If thy brother shall sin against thee, rebuke him between thee and him alone.” Why dost thou rebuke him? Because thou art grieved, that he should have sinned against thee? God forbid. If from love of thyself thou do it, thou doest nothing. If from love to him thou do it, thou doest excellently. In fact, observe in these words themselves, for the love of whom thou oughtest to do it, whether of thyself or him. “If he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother.” Do it for his sake then, that thou mayest “gain” him. If by so doing thou “gain” him, hadst thou not done it, he would have been lost. How is it then that most men disregard these sins, and say, “What great thing have I done? I have only sinned against man.” Disregard them not. Thou hast sinned against man; but wouldest thou know that in sinning against man thou art lost. If he, against whom thou hast sinned, have “rebuked thee between thee and him alone,” and thou hast listened to him, he hath “gained” thee. What can “hath gained thee,” mean; but that thou hadst been lost, if he had not gained thee. For if thou wouldest not have been lost, how hath he gained thee? Let no man then disregard it, when he sins against a brother. For the Apostle saith in a certain place, “But when ye sin so against the brethren, and wound their weak conscience, ye sin against Christ;” for this reason, because we have been all made members of Christ. How dost thou not sin against Christ, who sinnest against a member of Christ?

Quo animo frater corripiendus. Peccatum in hominem non contemnendum. Ideo debemus amando corripere; non nocendi aviditate, sed studio corrigendi. Tales si fuerimus, optime facimus quod hodie admoniti sumus: Si peccaverit in te frater tuus, corripe illum inter te et ipsum solum. Quare illum corripis? Quia te doles, quod peccaverit in te? Absit. Si amore tui id facis, nihil facis. Si amore illius facis, optime facis. Denique in ipsis verbis attende, cujus amore id facere debeas, utrum tui, an illius. Si te audierit, inquit, lucratus es fratrem tuum. Ergo propter illum fac, ut lucreris illum. Si faciendo lucraris, nisi fecisses perierat. Quid est ergo quod plerique homines ista peccata contemnunt, et dicunt, Quid magnum feci? in hominem peccavi. Noli contemnere. In hominem peccasti: vis nosse quia in hominem peccando peristi? Si te ille in quem peccasti, corripuerit inter te et ipsum solum, et audieris illum, lucratus est te. Quid est, lucratus est te; nisi quia perieras, si non lucraretur te? Nam si non perieras, quomodo te lucratus est? Nemo ergo contemnat, quando peccat in fratrem. Ait enim quodam loco Apostolus, Sic autem peccantes in fratres, et percutientes conscientiam eorum infirmam, in Christum peccatis : ideo quia membra Christi omnes facti sumus. Quomodo non peccas in Christum, qui peccas in membrum Christi?

32.5 PL 38, 508

5. Let no one therefore say, “I have not sinned against God, but against a brother. I have sinned against a man, it is a trifling sin, or no sin at all.” It may be, thou sayest it is a trifling sin, because it is soon cured. Thou hast sinned against a brother; give him satisfaction, and thou art made whole. Thou didst a deadly thing quickly, but quickly too hast thou found a remedy. Who of us, my Brethren, can hope for the kingdom of heaven, when the Gospel says, “Whosoever shall say to his brother, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire?” Exceeding terror! but behold in the same place the remedy: “If thou bring thy gift to the altar, and there rememberest that thy brother hath ought against thee, leave there thy gift before the altar.” God is not angry that thou deferrest to lay thy gift upon the Altar. It is thee that God seeketh more than thy gift. For if thou come with a gift to thy God, bearing an evil mind against thy brother, He will answer thee, “Thou art lost, what hast thou brought Me? Thou bringest thy gift, and thou art thyself no proper gift for God. Christ seeketh him whom He hath redeemed with His Blood, more than what thou hast found in thy barn.” So then, “Leave there thy gift before the altar, and go thy way, first be reconciled to thy brother, and so thou shalt come and offer thy gift.” Lo that “danger of hell fire,” how quickly dissolved it is! When thou wast not yet reconciled, thou wast “in danger of hell fire;” once reconciled, thou offerest thy gift before the altar in all security.

Hujus peccati remedium. Nemo ergo dicat, quia non peccavi in Deum, sed peccavi in fratrem, in hominem peccavi: leve peccatum est, vel nullum peccatum est. Forte inde dicis, Leve est, quia cito curatur. Peccasti in fratrem: fac satis, et sanatus es. Cito fecisti mortiferam rem, sed remedium cito invenisti. Quis nostrum speret regnum coelorum, fratres mei, quando dicit Evangelium, Qui dixerit fratri suo, Fatue, reus erit gehennae ignis? Magnus terror; sed vide ibi remedium: Si obtuleris munus tuum ad altare, et ibi recordatus fueris, quia frater tuus habet aliquid adversum te; relinque ibi munus tuum ante altare. Non irascitur Deus quia differs imponere munus tuum: te quaerit Deus magis quam munus tuum. Nam si malum animum gerens adversus fratrem tuum, adveneris cum munere ad Deum tuum, respondet tibi: Tu peristi, mihi quid attulisti? Offers munus tuum, et tu non es munus Dei. Plus quaerit Christus quem redemit sanguine suo, quam quod tu invenisti in horreo tuo. Ergo relinque ibi munus tuum ante altare, et vade prius reconciliari fratri tuo; et sic veniens offeres munus tuum . Ecce ille reatus gehennae quam cito solutus est. Nondum reconciliatus, eras gehennae reus: reconciliatus, securus offers munus tuum ad altare.

32.6 PL 38, 508

6. But men are easy and ready enough to inflict injuries, and hard to seek for reconciliation. Ask pardon, says one, of him whom thou hast offended, of him whom thou hast injured. He answers, “I will not so humble myself.” But now if thou despise thy brother, at least give ear to thy God. “He that humbleth himself shall be exalted.” Wilt thou refuse to humble thyself, who hast already fallen? Great is the difference between one who humbleth himself, and one who lieth on the ground. Already dost thou lie on the ground, and wilt thou then not humble thyself? Thou mightest well say, I will not descend; if thou hadst first been unwilling to fall.

Quid agere debeat, qui injuriam passus est. Homines autem faciles sunt ad irrogandas injurias, et difficiles ad concordiam requirendam. Pete, inquit, veniam ab homine quem offendisti, ab homine quem laesisti. Respondet: Non me humiliabo. Vel Deum tuum audi, si fratrem tuum contemnis: Qui se humiliat, exaltabitur . Non vis te humiliare qui cecidisti? Multum interest inter se humiliantem et inter jacentem. Jam jaces, et humiliare te non vis? Bene diceres, Nolo descendere; si noluisses ruere.

32.7 PL 38, 508

7. This then ought one to do who hath done an injury. And he who hath suffered one, what ought he to do? What we have heard to-day, “If thy brother shall sin against thee, rebuke him between thee and him alone.” If thou shall neglect this, thou art worse than he. He hath done an injury, and by doing an injury, hath stricken himself with a grievous wound; wilt thou disregard thy brother’s wound? Wilt thou see him perishing, or already lost, and disregard his case? Thou art worse in keeping silence, than he in his reviling. Therefore when any one sins against us, let us take great care, not for ourselves, for it is a glorious thing to forget injuries; only forget thine own injury, not thy brother’s wound. Therefore “rebuke him between thee and him alone,” intent upon his amendment, but sparing his shame. For it may be that through shame-facedness he will begin to defend his sin, and so thou wilt make him whom thou desirest to amend, still worse. “Rebuke him” therefore “between him and thee alone. If he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother;” because he would have been lost, hadst thou not done it. But “if he will not hear thee,” that is, if he will defend his sin as if it were a just action, “take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established; and if he will not hear them, refer it to the Church; but if he will not hear the Church, let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican.” Reckon him no more amongst the number of thy brethren. But yet neither is his salvation on that account to be neglected. For the very heathen, that is, the Gentiles and Pagans, we do not reckon among the number of brethren; but yet are we ever seeking their salvation. This then have we heard the Lord so advising, and with such great carefulness enjoining, that He even added this immediately, “Verily I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall bind on earth, shall be bound in heaven; and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth, shall be loosed in heaven.” Thou hast begun to hold thy brother for a publican; “thou bindest him on earth;” but see that thou bind him justly. For unjust bonds justice doth burst asunder. But when thou hast corrected, and been “reconciled to thy brother,” thou hast “loosed him on earth.” And when “thou shalt have loosed him on earth, he shall be loosed in heaven also.” Thus thou doest a great thing, not for thyself, but for him; for a great injury had he done, not to thee, but to himself.

Idem tractatur argumentum. Hoc ergo debet facere, qui fecit injuriam. Qui autem passus est, quid debet? Quod audivimus hodie: Si peccaverit in te frater tuus, corripe eum inter te et ipsum solum. Si neglexeris, pejor es. Ille injuriam fecit, et injuriam faciendo gravi se ipsum vulnere percussit: tu vulnus fratris tui contemnis? Tu eum vides perire, vel perisse, et negligis? Pejor es tacendo, qaum ille conviciando. Quando ergo in nos aliquis peccat, habeamus magnam curam, non pro nobis; nam gloriosum est injurias oblivisci: sed obliviscere injuriam tuam, non vulnus fratris tui. Ergo corripe eum inter te et ipsum solum, intendens correctioni, parcens pudori. Forte enim prae verecundia incipit defendere peccatum suum, et quem vis facere correctiorem, facis pejorem. Corripe ergo eum inter te et ipsum solum. Si te audierit, lucratus es fratrem tuum: quia perierat, nisi faceres. Si autem non te audierit, id est, peccatum suum quasi justitiam defenderit, adhibe tecum duos vel tres; quia in ore duorum vel trium testium stat omne verbum. Si nec ipsos audierit, refer ad Ecclesiam: si nec Ecclesiam audierit, sit tibi sicut ethnicus et publicanus. Noli illum deputare jam in numero fratrum tuorum. Nec ideo tamen salus ejus negligenda est. Nam et ipsos Ethnicos, id est, Gentiles et Paganos in numero quidem fratrum non deputamus; sed tamen eorum salutem semper inquirimus. Hoc ergo audivimus Dominum ita monentem, et tanta cura praecipientem, ut etiam hoc adderet continuo: Amen dico vobis, quaecumque ligaveritis super terram, ligata erunt et in coelo; et quaecumque solveritis in terra, soluta erunt et in coelo. Coepisti habere fratrem tuum tanquam publicanum, ligas illum in terra: sed ut juste alliges, vide. Nam injusta vincula disrumpit justitia. Cum autem correxeris, et concordaveris cum fratre tuo, solvisti illum in terra. Cum solveris in terra, solutus erit et in coelo. Multum praestas, non tibi, sed illi; quia multum nocuit, non tibi, sed sibi.

32.8 PL 38, 509

8. But since this is so, what is that which Solomon says, and which we heard first to-day out of another lesson, “He that winketh with the eyes deceitfully, heapeth sorrow upon men; but he that reproveth openly, maketh peace”? If then “he that reproveth openly, maketh peace;” how “rebuke him between him and thee alone”? We must fear, lest the divine precepts should be contrary to one another. But no: let us understand that there is the most perfect agreement in them, let us not follow the conceits of certain vain ones, who in their error think that the two Testaments in the Old and New Books are contrary to each other; that so we should think that there is any contradiction here, because one is in the book of Solomon, and the other in the Gospel. For if any one unskilful in, and a reviler of the divine Scriptures, were to say, “See where the two Testaments contradict each other. The Lord saith, ‘Rebuke him between him and thee alone.’ Solomon saith, ‘He that reproveth openly maketh peace.’” Doth not the Lord then know what He hath commanded? Solomon would have the sinners’ hard forehead bruised: Christ spareth his shame who blushes for his sins. For in the one place it is written, “He that reproveth openly maketh peace;” but in the other, “Rebuke him between him and thee alone;” not “openly,” but apart and secretly. But wouldest thou know, whosoever thou art that thinkest such things, that the two Testaments are not opposed to each other, because the first of these passages is found in the book of Solomon, and the other in the Gospel? Hear the Apostle. And surely the Apostle is a Minister of the New Testament. Hear the Apostle Paul then, charging Timothy, and saying, “Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear.” So then not the book of Solomon, but an Epistle of Paul the Apostle seems to be at issue with the Gospel. Let us then without any prejudice to his honour lay aside Solomon for a while; let us hear the Lord Christ and His servant Paul. What sayest Thou, O Lord? “If thy brother sin against thee, rebuke him between him and thee alone.” What sayest thou, O Apostle? “Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear.” What are we about? Are we listening to this controversy as judges? That be far from us. Yea, rather as those whose place is under the Judge, let us knock, that we may obtain, that it be opened to us; let us fly beneath the wings of our Lord God. For He did not speak in contradiction to His Apostle, seeing that He Himself spoke “in” him also, as he says, “Would ye receive a proof of Christ, who speaketh in me?” Christ in the Gospel, Christ in the Apostle: Christ therefore spake both; one by His own Mouth, the other by the mouth of His herald. For when the herald pronounces anything from the tribunal, it is not written in the records, “the herald said it;” but he is written as having said it, who commanded the herald what to say.

Conciliatur Evangelium cum Salomone. Haec cum ita sint, quid est quod ait Salomon, quod hodie ex alia lectione primitus audivimus: Annuens oculis cum dole, congerit hominibus moestitiam: qui autem arguit palam, pacem facit? Si ergo qui arguit palam, pacem facit; quomodo, Corripe illum inter te et ipsum solum? Metuendum est, ne sibi contraria sint praecepta divina. Sed intelligamus esse ibi summam concordiam, non quemadmodum quidam vani sapiamus, qui errantes opinantur contraria sibi esse duo Testamenta in Libris veteribus et novis: ut ideo putemus hoc esse contrarium, quoniam illud est in Salomonis libro, hoc in Evangelio. Si enim aliquis imperitus et calumniator divinarum Scripturarum diceret, Ecce ubi sibi contradicunt duo Testamenta. Dominus dicit, Corripe illum inter te et ipsum solum. Salomon dicit, Qui arguit palam, pacem facit. Ergo nescit Dominus quid praecepit? Salomon vult contundi frontem peccantis: Christus parcit pudori erubescentis. Ibi enim scriptum est, Qui arguit palam, pacem facit: hic autem, Corripe illum inter te et ipsum solum; non palam, sed in secreto et occulte. Vis nosse, quisquis talia cogitas, non sibi repugnare duo Testamenta, quia illud in libro Salomonis, hoc in Evangelio reperitur? Apostolum audi. Certe Apostolus minister est Novi Testamenti. Audi ergo apostolum Paulum Timotheo praecipientem et dicentem, Peccantes coram omnibus argue, ut et caeteri timorem habeant . Jam non Salomonis liber cum Evangelio, sed Pauli apostoli Epistola videtur confligere. Salomonem paululum sine injuria seponamus: Christum Dominum et Paulum servum ejus audiamus. Quid dicis, Domine? Si peccaverit in te frater tuus, corripe illum inter te et ipsum solum. Quid dicis, Apostole? Peccantes coram omnibus argue, ut et caeteri timorem habeant. Quid facimus? Controversiam istam velut judices audimus? Absit. Imo sub judice constituti pulsemus, uti nobis aperiri impetremus: fugiamus sub alas Domini Dei nostri. Non enim Apostolo suo contrarium locutus est, quia et in illo ipse locutus est, sicut dicit: An vultis experimentum ejus accipere, qui in me loquitur Christus ? Christus in Evangelio, Christus in Apostolo: Christus ergo utrumque dixit; unum ore suo, alterum ore praeconis sui. Quia quando praeco de tribunali aliquid dicit, non scribitur in Gestis, Praeco dixit: sed ille dixisse scribitur, qui praeconi quod diceret imperavit.

32.9 PL 38, 510

9. Let us then so give ear to these two precepts, Brethren, as that we may understand them, and let us settle ourselves in peace between them both. Let us but be in agreement with our own heart, and Holy Scripture will in no part disagree with itself. It is entirely true, both precepts are true; but we must make a distinction, that sometimes the one, sometimes the other must be done; that sometimes a brother must be “reproved between him and thee alone,” sometimes a brother “must be reproved before all, that others also may fear.” If we do sometimes the one, and sometimes the other, we shall hold fast the harmony of the Scriptures, and shall not err in fulfilling and obeying them. But a man will say to me, “When am I to do this one, and when the other? lest I ‘reprove between me and him alone,’ when I ought to ‘reprove before all;’ or ‘reprove before all,’ when I ought to reprove in secret.”

Correptio alias secreta, alias publica esse debet. Duo ergo ista praecepta, fratres, sic audiamus, ut intelligamus, et inter utraque praecepta pacati constituamur. Cum corde nostro nos concordemus, et Scriptura sancta in nulla parte discordat. Verum est omnino, utrumque verum est: sed discernere debemus, aliquando illud, aliquando illud esse faciendum; aliquando corripiendum fratrem inter te et ipsum solum, aliquando corripiendum fratrem coram omnibus, ut et caeteri timorem habeant. Si aliquando illud, aliquando illud fecerimus; concordiam Scripturarum tenebimus, et in faciendo atque obtemperando non errabimus. Sed dicit mihi aliquis: Quando facio illud, quando illud: ne tunc corripiam inter me et ipsum solum, quando debeo coram omnibus corripere; aut tunc corripiam coram omnibus, quando debeo in secreto corripere?

32.10 PL 38, 510

10. You will soon see, Beloved, what we ought to do, and when; only I would we may not be slow to practise it. Attend and see: “If thy brother sin against thee, rebuke him between him and thee alone.” Why? Because it is against thee that he hath sinned. What is that, “hath sinned against thee”? Thou knowest that he hath sinned. For because it was secret when he sinned against thee, seek for secresy, when thou dost correct his sin. For if thou only know that he hath sinned against thee, and thou wouldest “rebuke him before all,” thou art not a reprover, but a betrayer. Consider how that “just man” Joseph spared his wife with such exceeding kindness, in so great a crime as he had suspected her of, before he knew by whom she had conceived; because he perceived that she was with child, and he knew that he had not come in unto her. There remained then an unavoidable suspicion of adultery, and yet because he only had perceived, he only knew it, what does the Gospel say of him? “Then Joseph being a just man, and not willing to make her a public example.” The husband’s grief sought no revenge; he wished to profit, not to punish the sinner. “And not willing to make her a public example, he was minded to put her away privily.” But while he thought on these things, “behold, the Angel of the Lord appeared unto him,” in sleep; and told him how it was, that she had not defiled her husband’s bed, but that she had conceived of the Holy Ghost the Lord of them both. Thy brother then hath sinned against thee; if thou alone know it, then hath he really sinned against thee alone. For if in the hearing of many he hath done thee an injury, he hath sinned against them also whom he hath made witnesses of his iniquity. For I tell you, my dearly beloved Brethren, what you can yourselves recognise in your own case. When any one does my brother an injury in my hearing, God forbid that I should think that injury unconnected with myself. Certainly he has done it to me also; yea to me the rather, to whom he thought what he did was pleasing. Therefore those sins are to be reproved before all, which are committed before all; they are to be reproved with more secresy, which are committed more secretly. Distinguish times, and Scripture is in harmony with itself.

Quando secreta esse debet, quando publica. Cito videbit Charitas vestra, quid quando facere debeamus: sed utinam facere pigri non simus. Intendite, et videte: Si peccaverit, inquit, in te frater tuus, corripe eum inter te et ipsum solum. Quare? Quia peccavit in te. Quid est, in te peccavit? Tu scis quia peccavit. Quia enim secretum fuit, quando in te peccavit; secretum quaere, cum corrigis quod peccavit. Nam si solus nosti quia peccavit in te, et eum vis coram omnibus arguere; non es correptor, sed proditor. Attende quemadmodum vir justus, Joseph, tanto flagitio quod de uxore fuerat suspicatus, tanta benignitate pepercit, antequam sciret unde illa conceperat: quia gravidam senserat, et se ad illam non accessisse noverat. Restabat itaque certa adulterii suspicio: et tamen quia ipse solus senserat, ipse solus sciebat, quid de illo ait Evangelium? Joseph autem cum esset vir justus, et nollet eam divulgare. Mariti dolor non vindictam quaesivit: voluit prodesse peccanti, non punire peccantem. Cum, inquit, nollet eam divulgare, voluit eam occulte dimittere. Haec eo cogitante, ecce angelus Domini apparuit ei in somnis; et indicavit quid esset, quia non violavit viri torum, quia de Spiritu sancto conceperat Dominum amborum . Peccavit ergo in te frater tuus; si tu solus nosti, tunc vere in te solum peccavit. Nam si multis audientibus tibi fecit injuriam, et in illos peccavit, quos testes suae iniquitatis effecit. Dico enim, fratres charissimi, quod et vos ipsi in vobis ipsis potestis agnoscere. Quando me audiente, fratri meo quisque injuriam facit, absit ut a me injuriam illam alienam putem. Prorsus et mihi fecit: imo et mihi plus fecit, cui putavit placere quod fecit. Ergo ipsa corripienda sunt coram omnibus, quae peccantur coram omnibus: ipsa corripienda sunt secretius, quae peccantur secretius. Distribuite tempora, et concordat Scriptura.

32.11 PL 38, 511

11. So let us act; and so must we act not only when the sin is committed against ourselves, but when the sin is so committed by any one as that it is unknown by the other. In secret ought we to rebuke, in secret to reprove him; lest if we would reprove him publicly, we should betray the man. We wish to rebuke and reform him; but what if his enemy is looking out to hear something that he may punish? For example, a Bishop knows of some one who has killed another, and no one else knows of him. I wish to reprove him publicly; but thou art seeking to prosecute him. Decidedly then I will neither betray him, nor neglect him; I will reprove him in secret; I will set the judgment of God before his eyes; I will alarm his bloodstained conscience; I will persuade him to repentance. With this charity ought we to be endued. And hence men sometimes find fault with us, as if we do not reprove; or they think that we know what we do not know, or that we hush up what we know. And it may be that what thou knowest, I know also but I will not reprove in thy presence I because I wish to cure, not to act informer. There are men who commit adultery in their own houses, they sin in secret, sometimes they are discovered to us by their own wives, generally through jealousy, sometimes as seeking their husband’s salvation; in such cases we do not betray them openly, but reprove them in secret. Where the evil has happened, there let the evil die. Yet do we not neglect that wound; above all things showing the man who is in such a sinful state, and bears such a wounded conscience, that that is a deadly wound which they who suffer from, sometimes by an unaccountable perverseness despise; and seek out testimonies in their favour, I know not whence, null certainly and void, saying, “God careth not for sins of the flesh.” Where is that then which we have heard to-day, “Whoremongers and adulterers God will judge”? Lo! whosoever thou art that labourest under such a disease attend. Hear what God saith; not what thine own mind, in indulgence to thine own sins, may say, or what thy friend, thine enemy rather and his own too, bound in the same bond of iniquity with thee may say. Hear then what the Apostle saith; “Marriage is honourable in all, and the bed undefiled. But whoremongers and adulterers God will judge.”

Correptionis modus, curve secreto fiat. Peccata carnis mortifera. Sic agamus et sic agendum est, non solum quando in nos peccatur, sed quando peccatur ab aliquo, ut ab altero nesciatur. In secreto debemus corripere, in secreto arguere; ne volentes publice arguere, prodamus hominem. Nos volumus corripere et corrigere: quid, si inimicus quaerit audire quod puniat? Novit enim nescio quem homicidam episcopus, et alius illum nemo novit. Ego volo publice corripere, at tu quaeris inscribere. Prorsus nec prodo, nec negligo: corripio in secreto; pono ante oculos Dei judicium; terreo cruentam conscientiam; persuadeo poenitentiam. Hac charitate praediti esse debemus. Unde aliquando homines reprehendunt nos, quod quasi non corripiamus: aut putant nos scire quod nescimus, aut putant nos tacere quod scimus. Sed forte quod scis, et ego scio: sed non coram te corripio; quia curare volo, non accusare. Sunt homines adulteri in domibus suis, in secreto peccant; aliquando nobis produntur ab uxoribus suis plerumque zelantibus, aliquando maritorum salutem quaerentibus: nos non prodimus palam, sed in secreto arguimus. Ubi contigit malum, ibi moriatur malum. Non tamen vulnus illud negligimus; ante omnia ostendentes homini in tali peccato constituto sauciamque gerenti conscientiam, illud vulnus esse mortiferum: quod aliquando qui committunt, nescio qua perversitate contemnunt; et nescio unde sibi testimonia nulla et vana conquirunt, dicentes, Peccata carnis Deus non curat. Ubi est quod hodie audivimus: Fornicatores et adulteros judicat Deus? Ecce attende, quisquis tali morbo laboras. Quod dicit Deus audi: non quod tibi dicit favens peccatis tuis animus tuus, aut eadem tecum iniquitatis catena ligatus amicus tuus, vel potius inimicus tuus et suus. Audi ergo quod dicit Apostolus: Honorabiles, inquit, nuptiae in omnibus, et torus immaculatus. Fornicatores autem et adulteros judicat Deus .

32.12 PL 38, 511

12. Come then, Brother, be reformed. Thou art afraid lest thine enemy should prosecute thee; and art thou not afraid lest God should judge thee? Where is thy faith? Fear whilst there is the time for fear. Far off indeed is the day of judgment; but every man’s last day cannot be far off; for life is short. And since this shortness is ever uncertain, thou knowest not when thy last day may be. Reform thyself today, because of to-morrow. Let the reproof in secret be of service to thee now. For I am speaking openly, yet do I reprove in secret. I knock at the ears of all; but I accost the consciences of some. If I were to say, “Thou adulterer, reform thyself;” perhaps in the first place I might say what I had no knowledge of; perhaps suspect on a rash hearsay report. I do not then say, “Thou adulterer, reform thyself;” but “whosoever thou art among this people who art an adulterer, reform thyself.” So the reproof is public; the reformation secret. This I know, that whoso feareth, will reform himself.

Vita cito emendanda. Age ergo, frater, esto correctus. Times ne te inscribat inimicus; et non times ne te judicet Deus? Ubi est fides? Time cum est quando timeas. Longe est quidem dies judicii: sed uniuscujusque hominis dies ultimus longe esse non potest; quia brevis est vita. Et quia ipsa brevitas semper incerta, quando sit dies tuus ultimus, nescis. Corrige te hodie, propter cras. Prosit tibi et modo in secreto correptio. Palam enim loquor, et in secreto arguo. Aures omnium pulso: sed conscientias quorumdam convenio. Si dicerem, Tu, adulter, corrige te: primo forte dicerem quod nescirem; forte quod temere audieram, suspicarer. Non dico, Tu, adulter, corrige te; sed, quisquis in hoc populo adulter es, corrige te. Publica est correptio, sed secreta correctio. Scio quia ille qui timuerit, corrigit se.

32.13 PL 38, 512

13. Let no one say in his heart, “God careth not for sins of the flesh.” “Know ye not,” saith the Apostle, “that ye are the temple of God, and the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? If any man defile the temple of God, him will God destroy.” “Let no man deceive himself.” But perhaps a man will say, “My soul is the temple of God, not my body,” and will add this testimony also, “All flesh is as grass, and all the glory of man as the flower of grass.” Unhappy interpretation! conceit meet for punishment! The flesh is called grass, because it dies; but take thou heed that that which dies for a time, rise not again with guilt. Wouldest thou ascertain a plain judgment on this point also? “Know ye not,” says the same Apostle, “that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God?” Do not then any longer disregard sins of the body; seeing that your “bodies are the temples of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God.” If thou didst disregard a sin of the body, wilt thou disregard a sin which thou committest against a temple? Thy very body is a temple of the Spirit of God within thee. Now take heed what thou doest with the temple of God. If thou wert to choose to commit adultery in the Church within these walls, what wickedness could be greater? But now thou art thyself the temple of God. In thy going out, in thy coming in, as thou abidest in thy house, as thou risest up, in all thou art a temple. Take heed then what thou doest, take heed that thou offend not the Indweller of the temple, lest He forsake thee, and thou fall into ruins. “Know ye not,” he says, “that your bodies” (and this the Apostle spake touching fornication, that they might not think lightly of sins of the body) “are the temples of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?” For “ye have been bought with a great price.” If thou think so lightly of thine own body, have some consideration for thy price.

Peccata carnis non contemnenda. Non dicat in corde suo, Peccata carnis non curat Deus. Nescitis, inquit Apostolus, quia templum Dei estis, et Spiritus Dei habitat in vobis? Quisquis templum Dei violaverit, disperdet illum Deus . Nemo se fallat. Sed forte ait aliquis, Templum Dei animus meus est, non corpus meum: adjecit etiam testimonium, Omnis caro fenum, et omnis claritas carnis ut flos feni . Infelix interpretatio! punienda cogitatio! Fenum dicta est caro, quia moritur: sed quod ad tempus moritur, non resurgat cum crimine. Vis nosse apertam etiam inde sententiam? Nescitis, inquit idem apostolus, quia corpora vestra templum in vobis est Spiritus sancti, quem habetis a Deo? Contemnebas corporale peccatum, contemnis quod peccas in templum? Ipsum corpus tuum templum in te est Spiritus Dei. Jam vide quid facias de templo Dei. Si eligeres in ecclesia facere adulterium intra istos parietes, quid te esset sceleratius? Modo autem tu ipse es templum Dei. Templum intras, templum exis, templum in domo tua manes, templum surgis. Vide quid agas, vide ne offendas templi habitatorem, ne deserat te, et in ruinam vertaris. Nescitis, inquit, quia corpora vestra (et hoc de fornicatione loquebatur Apostolus, ne contemnerent corporalia peccata) templum in vobis est Spiritus sancti, quem habetis a Deo, et non estis vestri? Empti enim estis pretio magno . Si contemnis corpus tuum, considera pretium tuum.

32.14 PL 38, 512

14. I know, and as I do every one knows, who has used a little more than ordinary consideration, that no man who has any fear of God omits to reform himself in obedience to His words, but he who thinks that he has longer time to live. This it is which kills so many, while they are saying, “To-morrow, To-morrow;” and suddenly the door is shut. He remains outside with the raven’s croak, because he had not the moaning of the dove. “To-morrow, To-morrow;” is the raven’s croak. Moan plaintively as the dove, and beat thy breast; but whilst thou art inflicting blows on thy breast, be the better for the beating; lest thou seem not to beat thy conscience, but rather with blows to harden it, and make an evil conscience more unyielding instead of better. Moan with no fruitless moaning. For it may be thou art saying to thyself, “God hath promised me forgiveness, whenever I reform myself I am secure; I read the divine Scripture, “In the day that the wicked man turneth away from his wickedness, and doeth that which is lawful and right, I will forget all his iniquities.” I am secure then, whenever I reform myself, God will give me pardon for my evil deeds.” What can I say to this? Shall I lift up my voice against God? Shall I say to God, Do not give him pardon? Shall I say, This is not written, God hath not promised this? If I should say ought of this, I should say falsely. Thou speakest well and truly; God hath promised pardon on thy amendment, I cannot deny it; but tell me, I pray thee; see, I consent, I grant, I acknowledge that God hath promised thee pardon, but who hath promised thee a to-morrow? Where thou dost read to me that thou shalt receive pardon, if thou reform thyself; there read to me how long thou hast to live. Thou dost confess, “I cannot read it there.” Thou knowest not then how long thou hast to live. Reform thyself, and so be always ready. Be not afraid of the last day, as a thief, who will break up thy house as thou sleepest; but awake and reform thyself to-day. Why dost thou put it off till to-morrow? If thy life is to be a long one, let it be both long and good. No one puts off a good dinner, because it is to be a long one, and dost thou wish to have a long evil life? Surely if it is to be long, it will be all the better if it be good; if it is to be short, it is well that its good be as long as possible. But men neglect their life to such a degree, as that they are unwilling to have anything bad except it. You buy a farm, and you look out for a good one; you wish to marry a wife, you choose a good one; you wish for the birth of children, and you long for good ones; you bargain for shoes, and you do not wish for bad ones; and yet a bad life you do love. How hath thy life offended thee, that thou art willing to have it only bad; that amid all thy good things thou shouldest thyself alone be evil?

Correctio non procrastinanda. Vox corvina. Homines bona volunt habere omnia praeter vitam. Scio ego, et mecum omnis homo qui paulo attentius consideraverit, neminem Deum timentem sub verbis ejus non se corrigere, nisi qui putat, quia plus habet vivere. Ipsa res est quae multos occidit, cum dicunt, Cras, cras: et subito ostium clauditur. Remansit foris cum voce corvina, quia non habuit gemitum columbinum. Cras, cras; corvi vox. Geme ut columbus, et tunde pectus: sed plagas tibi dando in pectus, caesus correctus esto; ne non videaris conscientiam caedere, sed malam conscientiam pugnis pavimentare, solidiorem reddere, non correctiorem. Geme non inani gemitu. Forte enim dicis tibi: Promisit mihi Deus indulgentiam, quando me correxero; securus sum: lego divinam Scripturam, Iniquus in qua die conversus fuerit ab iniquitatibus suis, et fecerit justitiam, omnes iniquitates ejus obliviscar . Securus sum; quando me correxero, dat mihi Deus indulgentiam de malis meis. Et quid ego dicturus sum? Contra Deum reclamaturus? Dicturus sum Deo: Noli illi dare indulgentiam? Dicturus sum hoc scriptum non esse, hoc Deum non promisisse? Si ista dixero, omnia falsa dico. Bene dicis, verum dicis: indulgentiam correctioni tuae promisit Deus, negare non possum: sed dic mihi, rogo te; ecce ego consentio et concedo et cognosco quia indulgentiam Deus promisit tibi; crastinum enim diem quis tibi promisit? Ubi mihi legis indulgentiam te accepturum, si te correxeris; lege ibi mihi quantum victurus sis. Non lego, inquis. Nescis ergo quantum victurus sis. Esto correctus et semper paratus. Noli timere diem ultimum, tanquam furem qui te dormiente effodiat parietem: sed vigila, et corrige te hodie. Quid differs in crastinum? Longa vita erit. Ipsa longa, bona sit. Prandium bonum longum nemo differt, et vitam malam longam vis habere? Utique si longa erit, melius bona erit: si brevis erit, bene factum est, ut bona produceretur. Sic autem homines negligunt vitam suam, ut nolint habere malam, nisi ipsam. Villam emis, bonam quaeris; uxorem vis ducere, bonam eligis; filios tibi vis nasci, bonos optas; caligas locas, et non vis malas: et vitam amas malam! Quid te offendit vita tua, quam solam vis malam, ut inter omnia bona tua tu solus sis malus?

32.15 PL 38, 513

15. So then, my Brethren, if I should wish to reprove any of you individually in secret, perhaps he would listen to me. I reprove many of you now in public; all praise me; may some give attentive heed to me! I have no love for him who praises me with his voice, and with his heart despises me. For when thou dost praise, and not reform thyself, thou art a witness against thyself. If thou art evil, and thou art pleased with what I say, be displeased with thyself; because if thou art displeased with thyself as being evil, when thou dost reform, thou wilt be well pleased with thyself, which if I mistake not I said the day before yesterday. In all my words I set a mirror before you. Nor are they my words, but I speak at the bidding of the Lord, by whose terrors I refrain from keeping silence. For who would not rather choose to keep silence, and not to give account for you? But now I have undertaken the burden, and I cannot, and I ought not to shake it off my shoulders. When the Epistle to the Hebrews was being read, my Brethren, ye heard, “Obey them that have the rule over you, and submit yourselves; for they watch for your souls, as they that must give account, that they may do it with joy, and not with grief; for that is unprofitable for you.” When do we it with joy? When we see man making progress in the words of God. When does the labourer in the field work with joy? When he looks at the tree, and sees the fruit; when he looks at the crop, and sees the prospect of abundance of corn in the floor; when he sees that he has not laboured in vain, has not bowed his back, and bruised his hands, and endured the cold and heat in vain. This is what he says, “That they may do it with joy, and not with grief; for that is unprofitable for you.” Did he say, “unprofitable for them”? No. He said, “unprofitable for you.” For when those who are set over you are saddened at your evil deeds, it is profitable for them; their very sadness is profitable for them; but it is unprofitable for you. But we do not wish that anything should be profitable for us, which for you is unprofitable. Let us then, Brethren, do good together in the Lord’s field; that at the reward we may rejoice together.

Pastoris onus non abjiciendum. Ergo, fratres mei, si aliquem vestrum vellem in parte corripere, forte audiret me: multos vestrum publice corripio; omnes me laudant; audiat me aliquis. Non amo in voce laudatorem, et in corde contemptorem. Cum enim laudas, et non te corrigis, contra te testis es. Si malus es, et quod dico placet tibi, displice tibi: quia si malus displicueris tibi, correctus placebis tibi, quod nudiustertius, nisi fallor, dixi. In omnibus verbis meis speculum propono. Nec mea ista sunt verba: sed Domino jubente loquor, quo terrente non taceo. Nam quis non eligeret tacere, et rationem de vobis non reddere? Sed jam suscepimus onus, quod ab humeris nostris excutere non possumus, nec debemus. Audistis, fratres mei, cum Epistola ad Hebraeos legeretur: Obedite praepositis vestris, et subditi estote; quia ipsi vigilant pro animabus vestris, tanquam rationem reddituri pro vobis: ut cum gaudio hoc faciant, et non cum tristitia; non enim expedit vobis . Quando facimus ista cum gaudio? Quando videmus homines proficere in verbis Dei. Quando laborat cum gaudio operarius in agro? Quando attendit arborem, et fructum videt; quando attendit segetem, et frugum in area prospicit ubertatem: non sine causa laboravit, non sine causa dorsum curvavit, non sine causa manus attrivit, non sine causa frigus et aestum toleravit. Hoc est quod ait, Ut cum gaudio hoc faciant, et non cum tristitia; non enim expedit vobis. Numquid dixit, Non illis expedit. Non; sed dixit, Non expedit vobis. Nam illi praepositi quando contristantur de malis vestris, expedit illis; ipsa tristitia prodest illis: sed non expedit vobis. Nihil autem nobis volumus expedire, quod non expedit vobis. Simul ergo in Dominico agro, fratres, bonum operemur; ut simul de mercede gaudeamus.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Salva per dopo

Inserisci la tua email: ti invieremo un link per accedere. Nessuna password. Ciò che salvi (voci, versetti, capitoli, documenti) ti segue su ogni dispositivo.