Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 43
43.1 Chapter VIII. 48–59 PL 35, 1706
1. In that lesson of the holy Gospel which has been read to-day, from power we learn patience. For what are we as servants to the Lord, as sinners to the Just One, as creatures to the Creator? Howbeit, just as in what we are evil, we are so of ourselves; so in whatever respects we are good, we are so of Him, and through Him. And nothing does man so seek as he does power. He has great power in the Lord Christ; but let him first imitate His patience, that he may attain to power. Who of us would listen with patience if it were said to him, “Thou hast a devil”? as was said to Him, who was not only bringing men to salvation, but also subjecting devils to His authority.
In ista lectione sancti Evangelii, quae hodie recitata est, a potentia discimus patientiam. Quid enim sumus servi ad Dominum, peccatores ad justum, creatura ad Creatorem? Tamen quomodo si quid mali sumus, a nobis sumus; ita quidquid boni sumus, ab illo, et per illum sumus. Et nihil sic quaerit homo quomodo potentiam: habet Dominum Christum magnam potentiam: sed prius ejus imitetur patientiam, ut perveniat ad potentiam. Quis nostrum patienter audiret si alicui diceretur, Daemonium habes? Quod dictum est ei qui non solum homines salvabat, sed etiam daemonibus imperabat.
43.2 PL 35, 1707
2. For when the Jews had said, “Say we not well that thou art a Samaritan, and hast a devil?” of these two charges cast at Him, He denied the one, but not the other. For He answered and said, “I have not a devil.” He did not say, I am not a Samaritan; and yet the two charges had been made. Although He returned not cursing with cursing, although He met not slander with slander, yet was it proper for Him to deny the one charge and not to deny the other. And not without a purpose, brethren. For Samaritan means keeper. He knew that He was our keeper. For “He that keepeth Israel neither slumbereth nor sleepeth;” and, “Except the Lord keep the city, they wake in vain who keep it.” He then is our Keeper who is our Creator. For did it belong to Him to redeem us, and would it not be His to preserve us? Finally, that you may know more fully the hidden reason why He ought not to have denied that He was a Samaritan, call to mind that well-known parable, where a certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves, who wounded him severely, and left him half dead on the road. A priest came along and took no notice of him. A Levite came up, and he also passed on his way. A certain Samaritan came up—He who is our Keeper. He went up to the wounded man. He exercised mercy, and did a neighbor’s part to one whom He did not account an alien. To this, then, He only replied that He had not a devil, but not that He was not a Samaritan.
Hoc enim cum dixissent Judaei, Nonne bene dicimus nos quia Samaritanus es, et daemonium habes? horum duorum sibi objectorum unum negavit, alterum non negavit. Respondit enim, et ait: Ego daemonium non habeo. Non dixit, Samaritanus non sum: et utique duo fuerant objecta. Quamvis maledictum maledicto non reddiderit, quamvis convicium non convicio refutaverit; pertinuit tamen ad eum negare unam rem, alteram non negare. Non frustra, fratres. Samaritanus enim interpretatur Custos. Noverat se ille nostrum esse custodem. Non enim dormit neque dormitat qui custodit Israel : et, Nisi Dominus custodierit civitatem, in vanum vigilabunt qui custodiunt . Est ergo ille custos noster, qui creator noster. Num enim pertinuit ad eum ut redimeremur, et non pertineret ut servaremur? Denique ut plenius noveritis mysterium quare se Samaritanum negare non debuit, parabolam illam notissimam attendite, ubi homo quidam descendebat ab Jerusalem in Jericho, et incidit in latrones, qui eum graviter vulnerantes, semivivum in via reliquerunt. Transiit sacerdos, neglexit eum: transiit Levites, et ipse praeteriit: transiit quidam Samaritanus, ipse est custos noster; ipse accessit ad saucium, ipse impendit misericordiam, eique se praestitit proximum, quem non deputavit alienum . Ad hoc ergo solum quod daemonium non haberet, non autem se Samaritanum non esse, respondit.
43.3 PL 35, 1707
3. And then after such an insult, this was all that He said of His own glory: “But I honor,” said He, “my Father, and ye dishonor me.” That is, I honor not myself, that ye may not think me arrogant. I have One to honor; and did ye recognize me, just as I honor the Father, so would ye also honor me. I do what I ought; ye do not what ye ought.
Deinde post tale convicium, hoc solum dixit de gloria sua: Sed honorifico, inquit, Patrem meum, et vos inhonorastis me. Hoc est, Ego me non honorifico, ne vobis arrogans videar, habeo quem honorificem; sed si vos me agnosceretis, sicut ego honorifico Patrem, sic et vos honorificaretis me: ego facio quod debeo, vos non facitis quod debetis.
43.4 PL 35, 1707
4. “And I,” said He, “seek not mine own glory: there is one that seeketh and judgeth.” Whom does He wish to be understood but the Father? How, then, does He say in another place, “The Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son,” while here He says, “I seek not mine own glory: there is one that seeketh and judgeth”? If, then, the Father judgeth, how is it that He judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son?
Ego autem, inquit, non quaero gloriam meam; est qui quaerat et judicet. Quem vult intelligi, nisi Patrem? Quomodo ergo alio loco dicit, Pater non judicat quemquam, sed omne judicium dedit Filio ; et hic dicit, Non quaero gloriam meam; est qui quaerat et judicet? Si ergo judicat Pater, quomodo non judicat quemquam, sed omne judicium dedit Filio?
43.5 PL 35, 1707
5. In order to solve this point, attend. It may be solved by [quoting] a similar mode of speaking. Thou hast it written, “God tempteth not any man;” and again thou hast it written, “The Lord your God tempteth you, to know whether you love Him.” Just the point in dispute, you see. For how does God tempt not any man, and how does the Lord your God tempt you, to know whether ye love Him? It is also written, “There is no fear in love but perfect love casteth out fear;” and in another place it is written, “The fear of the Lord is clean, enduring for ever.” Here also is the point in dispute. For how does perfect love cast out fear, if the fear of the Lord, which is clean, endureth for ever?
Hanc quaestionem ut solvamus, attendite; simili locutione solvi potest. Scriptum habes, Deus neminem tentat ; et iterum scriptum habes, Tentat vos Dominus Deus vester, ut sciat si diligitis eum . Nempe quaestio est, videtis. Quomodo enim Deus neminem tentat, et quomodo tentat vos Dominus Deus vester, ut sciat si diligitis eum? Item scriptum est, Timor non est in charitate, sed perfecta charitas foras mittit timorem ; et alio loco scriptum est, Timor Domini castus, permanens in saeculum saeculi . Et ipsa quaestio est. Quomodo enim, perfecta charitas foras mittit timorem, si timor Domini castus permanet in saeculum saeculi?
43.6 PL 35, 1708
6. We are to understand, then, that there are two kinds of temptation: one, that deceives; the other, that proves. As regards that which deceives, God tempteth not any man; as regards that which proves, the Lord your God tempteth you, that He may know whether ye love Him. But here again, also, there arises another question, how He tempteth that He may know, from whom, prior to the temptation, nothing can be hid. It is not that God is ignorant; but it is said, that He may know, that is, that He may make you to know. Such modes of speaking are found both in our ordinary conversation, and in writers of eloquence. Let me say a word on our style of conversation. We speak of a blind ditch, not because it has lost its eyes, but because by lying hid it makes us blind to its existence. One speaks of “bitter lupins,” that is, “sour;” not that they themselves are bitter, but because they occasion bitterness to those who taste them. And so there are also expressions of this sort in Scripture. Those who take the trouble to attain a knowledge of such points have no trouble in solving them. And so “the Lord your God tempts you, that He may know.” What is this, “that He may know”? That He may make you to know “if you love Him.” Job was unknown to himself, but he was not unknown to God. He led the tempter into [Job], and brought him to a knowledge of himself.
Intelligimus ergo duas esse tentationes; unam quae decipit, alteram quae probat: secundum eam quae decipit, Deus neminem tentat; secundum eam quae probat, tentat vos Dominus Deus vester, ut sciat si diligitis eum. Sed iterum et hic alia nascitur quaestio, quomodo tentat ut sciat, quem latere nihil potest antequam tentet. Non ergo Deus nescit: sed dictum est, ut sciat, quod est, ut scire vos faciat. Locutiones tales et in sermonibus nostris sunt, et in auctoribus eloquentiae reperiuntur. De sermone nostro aliquid dicam. Fossa caeca dicitur, non quia ipsa oculos perdidit, sed quia latendo non videntes facit. Aliquid et de illis auctoribus dicam. Tristes lupinos ait quidam , hoc est amaros: non quia ipsi sunt tristes, sed quia gustati contristant, hoc est, tristes faciunt. Sunt ergo et in Scripturis locutiones ejusmodi. Qui in talibus quaestionibus cognoscendis laborant, in solvendis talibus quaestionibus non laborant. Ergo tentat vos Dominus Deus vester, ut sciat: quid est, ut sciat? Ut scire vos faciat, si diligi is eum. Job latebat se, sed Deum non latebat; admisit tentatorem, et fecit cum sui cognitorem.
43.7 PL 35, 1708
7. What then of the two fears? There is a servile fear, and there is a clean [chaste] fear: there is the fear of suffering punishment, there is another fear of losing righteousness. That fear of suffering punishment is slavish. What great thing is it to fear punishment? The vilest slave and the cruelest robber do so. It is no great thing to fear punishment, but great it is to love righteousness. Has he, then, who loves righteousness no fear? Certainly he has; not of incurring of punishment, but of losing righteousness. My brethren, assure yourselves of it, and draw your inference from that which you love. Some one of you is fond of money. Can I find any one, think you, who is not so? Yet from this very thing which he loves he may understand my meaning. He is afraid of loss: why is he so? Because he loves money. In the same measure that he loves money, is he afraid of losing it. So, then, some one is found to be a lover of righteousness, who at heart is much more afraid of its loss, who dreads more being stripped of his righteousness, than thou of thy money. This is the fear that is clean—this [the fear] that endureth for ever. It is not this that love makes away with, or casteth out, but rather embraces it, and keeps it with it, and possesses it as a companion. For we come to the Lord that we may see Him face to face. And there it is this pure fear that preserves us; for such a fear as that does not disturb, but reassure. The adulterous woman fears the coming of her husband, and the chaste one fears her husband’s departure.
Quid de duobus timoribus? Est timor servilis, et est timor castus; est timor ne patiaris poenam, est alius timor ne amittas justitiam. Timor ille ne patiaris poenam, servilis est. Quid magnum est timere poenam? Hoc et nequissimus servus, hoc et crudelissimus latro. Non est magnum timere poenam, sed magnum est amare justitiam. Qui ergo amat justitiam, nihil timet? Timet plane: non ne incidat in poenam, sed ne amittat justitiam. Fratres mei, credite, et conjicite ex eo quod amatis. Amat aliquis vestrum pecuniam. Putas, invenio aliquem qui non amet? Ex hoc tamen ipso quod amat, intelligat quod dico. Timet damnum: quare timet damnum? Quia pecuniam diligit. Quantum amat pecuniam, tantum timet ne perdat pecuniam. Ergo invenitur aliquis amator justitiae, qui plus in corde damnum pertimescat, qui plus timeat exspoliari justitia, quam tu pecunia. Ipse est timor castus, ipse permanet in saeculum saeculi: non eum tollit charitas, nec foras mittit, sed magis complectitur, et comitem tenet simul et possidet. Venimus enim ad Dominum, ut videamus facie ad faciem: ibi timor castus nos servat; timor enim ille non perturbat, sed confirmat. Timet mulier adultera ne vir ejus veniat, timet et casta ne vir ejus abscedat.
43.8 PL 35, 1708
8. Therefore, as, according to one kind of temptation, “God tempteth not any man;” but according to another, “The Lord your God tempteth you;” and according to one kind of fear, “there is no fear in love; but perfect love casteth out fear;” but according to another, “the fear of the Lord is clean, enduring for ever;”—so also, in this passage, according to one kind of judgment, “the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son;” and according to another, “I,” said He, “seek not mine own glory: there is one that seeketh and judgeth.”
Ergo sicut secundum aliam tentationem, Deus neminem tentat; secundum aliam vero, tentat vos Dominus Deus vester: et secundum alium timorem, timor non est in charitate, sed perfecta charitas foras mittit timorem; secundum vero alium timorem, timor Domini castus permanet in saeculum saeculi: sic et hoc loco, secundum alterum judicium, Pater non judicat quemquam, sed omne judicium dedit Filio; secundum vero alterum judicium, Ego, inquit, non quaero gloriam meam; est qui quaerat et judicet.
43.9 PL 35, 1708
9. This point may also be solved from the word itself. Thou hast penal judgment spoken of in the Gospel: “He that believeth not is judged already;” and in another place, “The hour is coming, when those who are in the graves shall hear His voice, and shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of judgment.” You see how He has put judgment for condemnation and punishment. And yet if judgment were always to be taken for condemnation, should we ever have heard in the psalm, “Judge me, O God”? In the former place, judgment is used in the sense of inflicting pain; here, it is used in the sense of discernment. How so? Just because so expounded by him who says, “Judge me, O God.” For read, and see what follows. What is this “Judge me, O God,” but just what he adds, “and discern my cause against an unholy nation”? Because then it was said, “Judge me, O God, and discern [the true merits of] my cause against an unholy nation;” similarly now said the Lord Christ, “I seek not mine own glory: there is one that seeketh and judgeth.” How is there “one that seeketh and judgeth”? There is the Father, who discerns and distinguishes between my glory and yours. For ye glory in the spirit of this present world. Not so do I who say to the Father, “Father, glorify Thou me with that glory which I had with Thee before the world was.” What is “that glory”? One altogether different from human inflation. Thus doth the Father judge. And so to “judge” is to “discern.” And what does He discern? The glory of His Son from the glory of mere men; for to that end is it said, “God, Thy God, hath anointed Thee with the oil of gladness above Thy fellows.” For not because He became man is He now to be compared with us. We, as men, are sinful, He is sinless; we, as men, inherit from Adam both death and delinquency, He received from the Virgin mortal flesh, but no iniquity. In fine, neither because we wish it are we born, nor as long as we wish it do we live, nor in the way that we wish it do we die: but He, before He was born, chose of whom He should be born; at His birth He brought about the adoration of the Magi; He grew as an infant, and showed Himself God by His miracles, and surpassed man in His weakness. Lastly, He chose also the manner of His death, that is, to be hung on the cross, and to fasten the cross itself on the foreheads of believers, so that the Christian may say, “God forbid that I should glory, save in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ.” On the very cross, when He pleased, He made His body be taken down, and departed; in the very sepulchre, as long as it pleased Him, He lay; and, when He pleased, He arose as from a bed. So, then, brethren, in respect to His very form as a servant (for who can speak of that other form as it ought to be spoken of, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God”?)—in respect, I say, to His very form as a servant, the difference is great between the glory of Christ and the glory of other men. Of that glory He spoke, when the devil-possessed heard Him say, “I seek not mine own glory: there is one that seeketh and judgeth.”
Et de ipso verbo quaestio ista solvatur. Habes in Evangelio commemoratum poenale judicium: Qui non credit, jam judicatus est ; et alio loco, Veniet hora quando ii qui sunt in monumentis audient vocem ejus, et procedent qui bene fecerunt, in resurrectionem vitae; qui male egerunt, in resurrectionem judicii . Videte quemadmodum judicium pro damnatione et poena posuit. Et tamen si semper judicium pro damnatione acciperetur, numquid audiremus in Psalmo, Judica me, Deus? Ibi judicium secundum afflictionem, hic judicium secundum discretionem positum est. Quomodo secundum discretionem? Quomodo exponit ipse qui ait, Judica me, Deus. Lege enim et vide quid sequitur. Quid est, Judica me, Deus? et discerne causam meam, inquit, de gente non sancta . Quod ergo dictum est, Judica me, Deus, et discerne causam meam de gente non sancta; secundum hoc ait modo Dominus Christus, Ego non quaero gloriam meam; est qui quaerat et judicet. Quomodo est qui quaerat et judicet? Est Pater qui gloriam meam a vestra gloria discernat et separet. Vos enim secundum hoc saeculum gloriamini: ego non secundum hoc saeculum glorior, qui Patri dico, Pater, glorifica me ea gloria quam habui apud te, antequam mundus esset . Quid est, ea gloria? Ab humana inflatione discreta. Secundum hoc judicat Pater. Quid est, judicat? Discernit. Quid discernit? Gloriam Filii sui a gloria hominum; quia ideo dictum est, Unxit te, Deus, Deus tuus oleo exsultationis prae participibus tuis . Non enim quia homo factus est, jam comparandus est nobis. Nos homines cum peccato, ille sine peccato: nos homines trahentes de Adam et mortem et delictum; ille de Virgine carnem mortalem, nullam iniquitatem. Denique nos nec quia volumus nati sumus, nec quamdiu volumus vivimus, nec quomodo volumus morimur: ille antequam nasceretur elegit de qua nasceretur, natus fecit ut a Magis adoraretur, crevit infans, et miraculis se Deum ostendebat, et infirmitate hominem praeferebat. Postremo elegit et genus mortis, hoc est, ut in cruce penderet, et ipsam crucem in frontibus fidelium figeret: ut dicat christianus, Mihi autem absit gloriari, nisi in cruce Domini nostri Jesu Christi . In ipsa cruce quando voluit, corpus dimisit, et abscessit: in ipso sepulcro quamdiu voluit, jacuit; quando voluit, tanquam de lecto surrexit. Ergo, fratres, secundum ipsam formam servi, (nam illud quis digne loquitur, In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum? ) secundum ipsam, inquam, formam servi multum interest inter gloriam Christi, et gloriam hominum caeterorum. De ipsa gloria dicebat, quando quod daemonium haberet audiebat, Ego non quaero gloriam meam; est qui quaerat et judicet.
43.10 PL 35, 1709
10. But what sayest Thou, O Lord, of Thyself? “Verily, verily, I say unto you, If a man keep my saying, he shall never see death.” Ye say, “Thou hast a devil.” I call you to life: keep my word and ye shall not die. They heard, “He shall never see death who keepeth my word,” and were angry, because already dead in that death from which they might have escaped. “Then said the Jews, Now we know that thou hast a devil. Abraham is dead, and the prophets; and thou sayest, If a man keep my saying, he shall never taste of death.” See how Scripture speaks: “He shall not see,” that is, “taste of death.” “He shall see death—he shall taste of death.” Who seeth? Who tasteth? What eyes has a man to see with when he dies? When death at its coming shuts up those very eyes from seeing aught, how is it said, “he shall not see death”? With what palate, also, and with what jaws can death be tasted, that its savor may be discovered? When it taketh every sense away, what will remain in the palate? But here, “he will see,” and “he will taste,” are used for that which is really the case, he will know by experience.
Tu autem de te, Domine, quid dicis? Amen, amen dico vobis; si quis sermonem meum servaverit, mortem non videbit in aeternum. Vos, inquit, dicitis, Daemonium habes; ego vos ad vitam voco: servate sermonem meum, et non moriemini. Illi audiebant, Mortem non videbit in aeternum, qui sermonem meum servaverit; et irascebantur, quia jam mortui erant illa morte quae vitanda erat. Dixerunt ergo Judaei: Nunc cognovimus quia daemonium habes. Abraham mortuus est et Prophetae, et tu dicis, Si quis sermonem meum servaverit, mortem non gustabit in aeternum. Videte locutionem Scripturarum: Mortem non videbit, id est, gustabit. Mortem videbit, mortem gustabit. Quis videt? quis gustat? Quos oculos habet homo, ut videat quando moritur? Quando veniendo mors ipsos oculos claudit ne aliquid videant; quomodo dicitur, non videbit mortem? Item quo palato, quibus faucibus mors gustatur, ut quid sapiat dignoscatur? Quando totum sensum tollit, quid in palato remanebit? Sed videbit dictum est et gustabit, pro eo quod est, experietur.
43.11 PL 35, 1710
11. Thus spake the Lord (it is scarcely sufficient to say), as one dying to dying men; for “to the Lord also belong the issues from death,” as saith the psalm. Seeing, then, He was both speaking to those destined to die, and speaking as one appointed to death Himself, what mean His words, “He who keepeth my saying shall never see death;” save that the Lord saw another death, from which He was come to deliver us—the second death, death eternal, the death of hell, the death of damnation with the devil and his angels? This is real death; for that other is only a removal. What is that other death? The leaving of the body—the laying down of a heavy burden; provided another burden be not carried away, to drag the man headlong to hell. Of that real death then did the Lord say, “He who keepeth my saying shall never see death.”
Haec Dominus, parum est si dicam, morituris, loquebatur moriturus: quia et Domini exitus mortis , sicut loquitur Psalmus. Cum ergo et morituris loqueretur, et moriturus loqueretur, quid sibi vult quod ait, Qui sermonem meum servaverit, mortem non videbit in aeternum; nisi quia videbat Dominus aliam mortem, de qua nos liberare venerat, mortem secundam, mortem aeternam, mortem gehennarum, mortem damnationis cum diabolo et angelis ejus? Ipsa est vera mors: nam ista migratio est. Quid est ista mors? Relictio corporis, depositio sarcinae gravis: sed si alia sarcina non portetur, qua homo in gehennas praecipitetur. De ipsa ergo morte Dominus dixit, Mortem non videbit in aeternum, qui sermonem meum servaverit.
43.12 PL 35, 1710
12. Let us not be frightened at that other death, but let us fear this one. But, what is very grievous, many, through a perverse fear of that other, have fallen into this. It has been said to some, Adore idols; for if you do it not, you shall be put to death: or, as Nebuchadnezzar said, If you do not, you shall be thrown into the furnace of flaming fire. Many feared and adored. Shrinking from death, they died. Through fear of the death which cannot be escaped, they fell into that which they might happily have escaped, had they not, unhappily, been afraid of that which is inevitable. As a man, thou art born—art destined to die. Whither wilt thou go to escape death? What wilt thou do to escape it? That thy Lord might comfort thee in thy necessary subjection to death, of His own good pleasure He condescended to die. When thou seest the Christ lying dead, art thou reluctant to die? Die then thou must; thou hast no means of escape. Be it today, be it tomorrow; it is to be—the debt must be paid. What, then, does a man gain by fearing, fleeing, hiding himself from discovery by his enemy? Does he get exemption from death? No, but that he may die a little later. He gets not security against his debt, but asks a respite. Put it off as long as you please, the thing so delayed will come at last. Let us fear that death which the three men feared when they said to the king, “God is able to deliver us even from that flame; and if not,” etc. There was there the fear of that death which the Lord now threatens, when they said, But also if He be not willing openly to deliver us, He can crown us with victory in secret. Whence also the Lord, when on the eve of appointing martyrs and becoming the head-martyr Himself, said, “Be not afraid of them that kill the body, and after that have no more that they can do.” How “have they no more that they can do”? What if, after having slain one, they threw his body to be mangled by wild beasts, and torn to pieces by birds? Cruelty seems still to have something it can do. But to whom is it done? He has departed. The body is there, but without feeling. The tenement lies on the ground, the tenant is gone. And so “after that they have no more that they can do;” for they can do nothing to that which is without sensation. “But fear Him who hath power to destroy both body and soul, in hell fire.” Here is the death that He spake of when He said, “He that keepeth my saying shall never see death.” Let us keep then, brethren, His own word in faith, as those who are yet to attain to sight, when the liberty we receive has reached its fullness.
Non expavescamus istam mortem, sed illam timeamus. Quod est autem gravius, multi perverse timendo istam, inciderunt in illam. Dictum est aliquibus, Adorate idola; quod si non feceritis, interficiemini: aut quemadmodum ille Nabuchodonosor dixit, Si non feceritis, mittemini in caminum ignis ardentis. Multi timuerunt et adoraverunt; nolentes mori mortui sunt: timendo mortem quae non evaditur, inciderunt in mortem quam evadere feliciter possent, si istam quae non evaditur, infeliciter non timerent. Natus es homo, moriturus es. Qua ibis, ut non moriaris? quid facies ut non moriaris? Ut Dominus tuus necessitate moriturum consolaretur, voluntate mori dignatus est. Quando vides Christum mortuum, dedignaris mori? Ergo moriturus es: qua evadas hoc, non habes. Hodie sit, cras sit; futurum est, debitum est reddendum. Quid ergo agit homo timens, fugiens, occultans se ne inveniatur ab inimico? Numquid agit ut non moriatur? Sed ut paulo serius moriatur. Non accipit debiti securitatem, sed postulat dilationem. Quantumlibet diu differatur, veniet quod differtur. Illam mortem timeamus quam timuerunt tres viri, quando dixerunt regi, Potens est Deus etiam de ista flamma liberare nos; sed et si non . Ibi fuit timor illius mortis, quam modo Dominus comminatur, quando dixerunt, Sed et si noluerit aperte liberare, potest in occulto coronare. Unde et ipse Dominus facturus martyres, et caput martyrum futurus ait: Nolite timere eos qui occidant corpus, et postea non habent quid faciant. Quomodo non habent quid faciant? Quid si cum occiderint, corpus bestiis lacerandum et diripiendum alitibus projiciant? videtur adhuc saevitia habere quod faciat. Sed cui facit? Qui migravit. Inest corpus, sed nullus est sensus: habitatio jacet, habitator abscessit. Ergo postea non habent quid faciant: non sentienti enim nihil faciunt. Sed eum timete qui habet potestatem et corpus et animam occidere in gehenna ignis . Ecce de qua morte loquebatur, cum diceret, Qui sermonem meum servaverit, mortem non videbit in aeternum. Servemus ergo, fratres, sermonem ipsius in fide; perventuri ad speciem, cum acceperimus plenissimam libertatem.
43.13 PL 35, 1711
13. But those men, indignant, yet dead, and predestinated to death eternal, answered with insults, and said, “Now we know that thou hast a devil. Abraham is dead, and the prophets.” But not in that death which the Lord meant to be understood was either Abraham dead or the prophets. For these were dead, and yet they live: those others were alive, and yet they had died. For, replying in a certain place to the Sadducees, when they stirred the question of the resurrection, the Lord Himself speaks thus: “But as touching the resurrection of the dead, have ye not read how the Lord said to Moses from the bush, I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? He is not the God of the dead, but of the living.” If, then, they live, let us labor so to live, that after death we may be able to live with them. “Whom makest thou thyself,” they add, that thou sayest, “he shall never see death who keepeth my saying,” when thou knowest that both Abraham is dead and the prophets?
Isti autem indignantes mortui, et morti sempiternae praedestinati, respondebant conviciose, et dicebant: Modo cognovimus quia daemonium habes. Abraham mortuus est et Prophetae. Sed ista morte quam Dominus vult intelligi, nec Abraham mortuus est, nec Prophetae. Illi enim mortui sunt, et vivunt: isti vivebant, et mortui erant. Nam respondens quodam loco Sadducaeis moventibus quaestionem de resurrectione, hoc ait ipse Dominus: De resurrectione autem mortuorum non legistis, quomodo ait Dominus de rubo ad Moysen, Ego sum Deus Abraham, et Deus Isaac, et Deus Jacob? Non est Deus mortuorum, sed vivorum . Si ergo illi vivunt, laboremus sic vivere, ut cum illis vivere possimus cum mortui fuerimus. Quem teipsum facis, inquiunt, ut dicas, Mortem non videbit in aeternum, qui sermonem meum servaverit; cum scias et Abraham mortuum et prophetas?
43.14 PL 35, 1711
14. “Jesus answered, If I glorify myself, my glory is nothing: it is my Father that glorifieth me.” He said this on account of their saying, “Whom makest thou thyself?” For He refers His glory to the Father, of whom it is that He is God. From this expression also the Arians sometimes revile our faith, and say, See, the Father is greater; for at all events He glorifies the Son. Heretic, hast thou not read of the Son Himself also saying that He glorifies His Father? If both He glorifieth the Son, and the Son glorifieth the Father, lay aside thy stubbornness, acknowledge the equality, correct thy perversity.
Respondit Jesus: Si ego glorifico meipsum, gloria mea nihil est: est Pater meus qui glorificat me. Hoc ait propter illud quod dixerunt, Quem teipsum facis? Refert enim gloriam suam ad Patrem, de quo est quod Deus est. Aliquando Ariani et de isto verbo calumniantur fidei nostrae, et dicunt: Ecce major est Pater, quia utique glorificat Filium. Haeretice, non legisti et ipsum Filium dicentem quod glorificet Patrem suum ? Si et ille Filium glorificat, et Filius Patrem glorificat: pone pervicaciam, agnosce aequalitatem, corrige perversitatem.
43.15 PL 35, 1711
15. “It is,” then, said He, “my Father that glorifieth me; of whom ye say, that He is your God: and ye have not known Him.” See, my brethren, how He shows that God Himself is the Father of the Christ, who was announced also to the Jews. I say so for this reason, that now again there are certain heretics who say that the God revealed in the Old Testament is not the Father of Christ, but some prince or other, I know not what, of evil angels. There are Manicheans who say so; there are Marcionites who say so. There are also, perhaps, other heretics, whom it is either unnecessary to mention, or all of whom I cannot at present recall; yet there have not been wanting those who said this. Attend, then, that you may have something also to affirm against such. Christ the Lord calleth Him His Father whom they called their God, and did not know; for had they known [that God] Himself they would have received His Son. “But I,” said He, “know Him.” To those judging after the flesh He might have seemed from such words to be self-assuming, because He said, “I know Him.” But see what follows: “If I should say that I know Him not, I shall be a liar like unto you.” Let not, then, self-assumption be so guarded against as to cause the relinquishment of truth. “But I know Him, and keep His saying.” The saying of the Father He was speaking as Son; and He Himself was the Word of the Father, that was speaking to men.
Est ergo, inquit, Pater meus qui glorificat me, quem vos dicitis, Quia Deus noster est, et non cognovistis eum. Videte, fratres mei, quemadmodum ostendat ipsum Deum Patrem esse Christi, qui annuntiatus est et Judaeis. Propterea dico, quia rursus quidam haeretici dicunt Deum annuntiatum in Veteri Testamento, non esse Patrem Christi; sed nescio quem principem malorum angelorum. Manichaei sunt qui ista dicunt, Marcionitae sunt qui ista dicunt. Sunt et alii fortasse haeretici, quos commemorare vel non opus est, vel a me omnes recoli in praesentia non possunt: non defuerunt tamen qui hoc dicerent. Itaque attendite, ut habeatis quid dicatis et contra ipsos. Eum dicit Patrem suum Dominus Christus, quem illi dicebant Deum suum, et non cognoverunt: si enim ipsum cognovissent, ejus Filium recepissent. Ego autem, inquit, novi eum. Secundum carnem judicantibus potuit et hinc arrogans videri, quia dixit, Ego novi eum. Sed videte quid sequatur: Si dixero quia non novi eum, ero similis vobis mendax. Ergo arrogantia non ita caveatur, ut veritas relinquatur. Sed scio eum, et sermonem ejus servo. Sermonem Patris tanquam Filius loquebatur; et ipse erat Verbum Patris, quod hominibus loquebatur.
43.16 PL 35, 1712
16. “Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day; and he saw, and was glad.” Abraham’s seed, Abraham’s Creator, bears a great testimony to Abraham. “Abraham rejoiced,” He says, “to see my day.” He did not fear, but “rejoiced to see it.” For in him there was the love that casteth out fear. He says not, rejoiced because he saw; but “rejoiced that he might see.” Believing, at all events, he rejoiced in hope to see with the understanding. “And he saw.” And what more could the Lord Jesus Christ say, or what more ought He to have said? “And he saw,” He says, “and was glad.” Who can unfold this joy, my brethren? If those rejoiced whose bodily eyes were opened by the Lord, what joy was his who saw with the eyes of his soul the light ineffable, the abiding Word, the brilliance that dazzles the minds of the pious, the unfailing Wisdom, God abiding with the Father, and at some time come in the flesh and yet not to withdraw from the bosom of the Father? All this did Abraham see. For in saying “my day,” it may be uncertain of what He spake; whether the day of the Lord in time, when He should come the flesh, or that day of the Lord which knows not a dawn, and knows no decline. But for my part I doubt not that father Abraham knew it all. And where shall I find it out? Ought the testimony of our Lord Jesus Christ to satisfy us? Let us suppose that we cannot find it out, for perhaps it is difficult to say in what sense it is clear that Abraham “rejoiced to see the day” of Christ, “and saw it, and was glad.” And though we find it not, can the Truth have lied? Let us believe the Truth, and cherish no doubt of Abraham’s merited rewards. Yet listen to one passage that occurs to me meanwhile. When father Abraham sent his servant to seek a wife for his son Isaac, he bound him by this oath, to fulfill faithfully what he was commanded, and know also for himself what to do. For it was a great matter that was in hand when marriage was sought for Abraham’s seed. But that the servant might apprehend what Abraham knew, that it was not offspring after the flesh he desired, nor anything of a carnal kind concerning his race that was referred to, he said to the servant whom he sent, “Put thy hand under my thigh, and swear by the God of heaven.” What connection has the God of heaven with Abraham’s thigh? Already you understand the mystery: by thigh is meant race. And what was that swearing, but the signifying that of Abraham’s race would the God of heaven come in the flesh? Fools find fault with Abraham because he said, Put thy hand under my thigh. Those who find fault with Christ’s flesh find fault with Abraham’s conduct. But let us, brethren, if we acknowledge the flesh of Christ as worthy of veneration, despise not that thigh, but receive it as spoken of prophetically. For a prophet also was Abraham. Whose prophet? Of his own seed, and of his Lord. To his own seed he pointed in saying, “Put thy hand under my thigh.” To his Lord he pointed in adding, “and swear by the God of heaven.”
Abraham pater vester exsultavit ut videret diem meum; et vidit, et gavisus est. Magnum testimonium perhibet Abrahae, semen Abrahae, creator Abrahae: Abraham exsultavit, inquit, ut videret diem meum. Non timuit, sed exsultavit ut videret. Erat enim in illo charitas quae foras mittit timorem . Non ait, Exsultavit, quia vidit; sed, exsultavit ut videret. Credens utique exsultavit sperando, ut videret intelligendo. Et vidit, Et quid potuit plus dicere, vel quid debuit plus dicere Dominus Jesus Christus? Et vidit, inquit, et gavisus est. Quis explicat hoc gaudium, fratres mei? Si gavisi sunt illi quibus Dominus oculos carnis aperuit, quale gaudium fuit videntis cordis oculis lucem ineffabilem, Verbum manens, splendorem piis mentibus refulgentem, sapientiam indeficientem, apud Patrem manentem Deum, et aliquando in carne venturum, nec de Patris gremio recessurum? Totum hoc vidit Abraham. Nam quod ait, diem meum, incertum potest esse unde dixerit; utrum diem Domini temporalem quo erat venturus in carne, an diem Domini qui nescit ortum, nescit occasum. Sed ego non dubito patrem Abraham totum scisse. Et ubi inveniam? An sufficere nobis debet testimonium Domini nostri Jesu Christi? Putemus nos invenire non posse, quia forte difficile est, quomodo manifestum sit quod Abraham exsultavit ut videret diem Christi, et vidit, et gavisus est. Et si nos non invenimus, numquid mentiri veritas posset? Credamus veritati, et de Abrahae meritis minime dubitemus. Tamen audite unum locum, qui mihi interim occurrit. Pater Abraham quando misit servum suum, ut peteret uxorem filio suo Isaac, hoc eum sacramento obstrinxit, ut fideliter quod jubebatur impleret, et sciret etiam ipse quid faceret. Magna enim res agebatur, quando Abrahae semini conjugium quaerebatur. Sed ut hoc cognosceret servus quod noverat Abraham, quia nepotes non carnaliter desiderabat, nec de genere suo aliquid carnale sapiebat; ait servo suo quem mittebat: Pone manum sub femore meo, et jura per Deum coeli . Quid vult Deus coeli ad femur Abrahae? Jam intelligitis sacramentum: per femur, genus. Ergo quae fuit illa juratio, nisi quia significabatur de genere Abrahae venturum in carne Deum coeli? Stulti reprehendunt Abraham, quia dixit, Mitte manum sub femore meo. Qui reprehendunt carnem Christi, reprehendunt factum Abrahae. Nos autem, fratres, si agnoscimus carnem Christi venerandam, illud femur non contemnamus, sed in prophetia dictum accipiamus. Etenim propheta erat Abraham. Cujus propheta? Seminis sui et Domini sui. Semen suum significavit dicendo, Mitte manum sub femore meo: Dominum suum significavit addendo, et jura per Deum coeli.
43.17 PL 35, 1713
17. The angry Jews replied, “Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham?” And the Lord: “Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was made, I am.” Weigh the words, and get a knowledge of the mystery. “Before Abraham was made.” Understand, that “was made” refers to human formation; but “am” to the Divine essence. “He was made,” because Abraham was a creature. He did not say, Before Abraham was, I was; but, “Before Abraham was made,” who was not made save by me, “I am.” Nor did He say this, Before Abraham was made I was made; for “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth;” and “in the beginning was the Word.” “Before Abraham was made, I am.” Recognize the Creator—distinguish the creature. He who spake was made the seed of Abraham; and that Abraham might be made, He Himself was before Abraham.
Irati Judaei responderunt: Quinquaginta annos nondum habes, et Abraham vidisti! Et Dominus: Amen, amen dico vobis; antequam Abraham fieret, ego sum. Appende verba, et cognosce mysterium. Antequam Abraham fieret. Intellige, fieret ad humanam facturam, sum vero ad divinam pertinere substantiam. Fieret, quia creatura est Abraham. Non dixit, Antequam Abraham esset, ego eram; sed, Antequam Abraham fieret, qui nisi per me non fieret, ego sum. Neque hoc dixit, Antequam Abraham fieret, ego factus sum, In principio enim fecit Deus coelum et terram : nam in principio erat Verbum . Antequam fieret Abraham, ego sum. Agnoscite Creatorem, discernite creaturam. Qui loquebatur, semen Abrahae factus erat; et ut Abraham fieret, ante Abraham ipse erat.
43.18 PL 35, 1713
18. Hence, as if by the most open of all insults thrown at Abraham, they were now excited to greater bitterness. Of a certainty it seemed to them that Christ the Lord had uttered blasphemy in saying, “Before Abraham was made, I am.” “Therefore took they up stones to cast at Him.” To what could so great hardness have recourse, save to its like? “But Jesus” [acts] as man, as one in the form of a servant, as lowly, as about to suffer, about to die, about to redeem us with His blood; not as He who is—not as the Word in the beginning, and the Word with God. For when they took up stones to cast at Him, what great thing were it had they been instantly swallowed up in the gaping earth, and found the inhabitants of hell in place of stones? It were not a great thing to God; but better was it that patience should be commended than power exerted. Therefore “He hid Himself” from them, that He might not be stoned. As man, He fled from the stones; but woe to those from whose stony hearts God has fled?
Hinc jam velut Abrahae apertissimo convicio commoti sunt acrius. Blasphemasse quippe illis visus est Dominus Christus, quoniam dixit, Antequam Abraham fieret, ego sum. Tulerunt ergo lapides ut jacerent in eum. Tanta duritia quo curreret, nisi ad similes? Jesus autem, tanquam homo, tanquam in forma servi, tanquam humilis, tanquam passurus, tanquam mori turus, tanquam nos suo sanguine redempturus: non tanquam ille qui est, non tanquam in principio Verbum, et Verbum apud Deum. Nam cum illi lapides tulerunt ut mitterent in eum, quid magnum erat ut eos continuo dehiscens terra sorberet, et pro lapidibus inferos invenirent? Non erat magnum Deo: sed magis erat commendanda patientia, quam exserenda potentia. Abscondit se ergo ab eis, ne lapidaretur. Tanquam homo a lapidibus fugit: sed vae illis a quorum lapideis cordibus Deus fugit!