Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 41

St Augustine of Hippo (AD 354–430) · In Joannis evangelium tractatus CXXIV · PL 35, 1379–1976

41.1 Chapter VIII. 31–36 PL 35, 1692

1. Of what follows of the previous lesson, and has been read publicly to us to-day from the holy Gospel, I then deferred speaking, because I had already said much, and of that liberty into which the grace of the Saviour calleth us it was needful to treat in no cursory or negligent way. Of this, by the Lord’s help, we purpose speaking to you to-day. For those to whom the Lord Jesus Christ was speaking were Jews, in a large measure indeed His enemies, but also in some measure already become, and yet to be, His friends; for some He saw there, as we have already said, who should yet believe after His passion. Looking to these, He had said, “When ye have lifted up the Son of man, then shall ye know that I am [He].” There also were those who, when He so spake, straightway believed. To them He spake what we have heard to-day: “Then said Jesus to those Jews who believed on Him, If ye continue in my word, ye shall be my disciples indeed.” By continuing ye shall be so; for as now ye are believers, by so continuing ye shall be beholders. Hence there follows, “And ye shall know the truth.” The truth is unchangeable. The truth is bread, which refreshes our minds and fails not; changes the eater, and is not itself changed into the eater. The truth itself is the Word of God, God with God, the only-begotten Son. This Truth was for our sake clothed with flesh, that He might be born of the Virgin Mary, and the prophecy fulfilled, “Truth has sprung from the earth.” This Truth then, when speaking to the Jews, lay hid in the flesh. But He lay hid not in order to be denied, but to be deferred [in His manifestation]; to be deferred, in order to suffer in the flesh; and to suffer in the flesh, in order that flesh might be redeemed from sin. And so our Lord Jesus Christ, standing full in sight as regards the infirmity of flesh, but hid as regards the majesty of Godhead, said to those who had believed on Him, when He so spake, “If ye continue in my word, ye shall be my disciples indeed.” For he that endureth to the end shall be saved. “And ye shall know the truth,” which now is hid from you, and speaks to you. “And the truth shall free you.” This word, liberabit [shall free], the Lord hath taken from libertas [freedom]. For liberat [frees, delivers] is properly nothing else but liberum facit [makes free]. As salvat [he saves] is nothing else but salvum facit [he makes safe]; as he heals is nothing else but he makes whole; he enriches is nothing else but he makes rich; so liberat [he frees] is nothing else but liberum facit [he makes free]. This is clearer in the Greek word. For in Latin usage we commonly say that a man is delivered (liberari), in regard not to liberty, but only to safety, just as one is said to be delivered from some infirmity. So is it said customarily, but not properly. But the Lord made such use of this word in saying, “And the truth shall make you free (liberabit),” that in the Greek tongue no one could doubt that He spake of freedom.

Quod de lectione pristina sequitur, et de sancto Evangelio hodie nobis recitatum est, tunc distuli dicere, quoniam multa jam dixeram, et de libertate in quam nos vocat gratia Salvatoris, non praetereunter neque negligenter fuerat disserendum: hinc hodie, Domino adjuvante, statuimus loqui vobis. Quibus enim loquebatur Dominus Jesus Christus, Judaei erant, ex magna quidem parte inimici, sed etiam amici ex quadam parte jam facti, et futuri: nam quosdam ibi videbat, sicuti jam diximus, qui post ejus passionem fuerant credituri. Hos intuens dixerat: Cum exaltaveritis Filium hominis, tunc cognoscetis quia ego sum . Erant ibi etiam qui haec loquente illo continuo crediderunt; ipsis locutus est quod audivimus hodie: Dicebat ergo Jesus ad eos qui crediderant ei, Judaeos: Si manseritis in verbo meo, vere discipuli mei eritis. Manendo eritis: quia enim nunc credentes estis, manendo videntes eritis. Ideo sequitur, Et cognoscetis veritatem. Veritas incommutabilis est. Veritas panis est, mentes reficit nec deficit: mutat vescentem, non ipsa in vescentem mutatur. Ipsa est veritas Verbum Dei, Deus apud Deum unigenitus Filius. Haec Veritas carne induta est propter nos, ut de Maria virgine nasceretur, et impleretur prophetia, Veritas de terra orta est . Haec ergo Veritas cum Judaeis loqueretur, latebat in carne: latebat autem non ut negaretur, sed ut differretur; differretur, ut in carne pateretur; in carne autem pateretur, ut caro peccati redimeretur. Stans itaque conspicuus secundum infirmitatem carnis Dominus noster Jesus Christus, et secundum majestatem divinitatis occultus, dixit ad eos qui ei, eum haec loqueretur, crediderant, Si manseritis in verbo meo, vere discipuli mei eritis. Qui enim perseveraverit usque in finem, hic salvus erit . Et cognoscetis veritatem, quae modo vos latet, et loquitur vobis. Et veritas liberabit vos. Hoc verbum Dominus a libertate posuit, liberabit vos. Nihil est enim aliud proprie liberat, nisi liberum facit. Quomodo salvat nihil est aliud quam salvum facit; quomodo sanat nihil est aliud quam sanum facit; ditat nihil est aliud quam ditem, id est, divitem facit: sic liberat nihil est aliud quam liberum facit. Hoc in verbo graeco planius est. Nam in latina consuetudine plerumque dicimus hominem liberari, quod ad libertatem non pertinet, sed tantum ad salutem: sicut quisquam dicitur liberari ab infirmitate; usitate dicitur, non tamen proprie. Sic autem posuit Dominus hoc verbum, ut diceret, Et veritas liberabit vos, ut in graeca lingua nemo dubitet eum de libertate dixisse.

41.2 PL 35, 1693

2. In short, the Jews also so understood and “answered Him;” not those who had already believed, but those in that crowd who were not yet believers. “They answered Him, We are Abraham’s seed, and were never in bondage to any man: how sayest thou, Ye shall be free?” But the Lord had not said, “Ye shall be free,” but, “The truth shall make you free.” That word, however, they, because, as I have said, it is clearly so in the Greek, understood as pointing only to freedom, and puffed themselves up as Abraham’s seed, and said, “We are Abraham’s seed, and were never in bondage to any man: how sayest thou, Ye shall be free?” O inflated skin! such is not magnanimity, but windy swelling. For even as regards freedom in this life, how was that the truth when you said, “We were never in bondage to any man”? Was not Joseph sold? Were not the holy prophets led into captivity? And again, did not that very nation, when making bricks in Egypt, also serve hard rulers, not only in gold and silver, but also in clay? If you were never in bondage to any man, ungrateful people, why is it that God is continually reminding you that He delivered you from the house of bondage? Or mean you, perchance, that your fathers were in bondage, but you who speak were never in bondage to any man? How then were you now paying tribute to the Romans, out of which also you formed a trap for the Truth Himself, as if to ensnare Him, when you said, “Is it lawful to give tribute to Cæsar?” in order that, had He said, It is lawful, you might fasten on Him as one ill-disposed to the liberty of Abraham’s seed; and if He said, It is not lawful, you might slander Him before the kings of the earth, as forbidding the payment of tribute to such? Deservedly were you defeated on producing the money, and compelled yourselves to concur in your own capture. For there it was told you, “Render to Cæsar the things that are Cæsar’s, and to God the things that are God’s,” after your own reply, that the money-piece bore the image of Cæsar. For as Cæsar looks for his own image on the coin, so God looks for His in man. Thus, then, did He answer the Jews. I am moved, brethren, by the hollow pride of men, because even of that very freedom of theirs, which they understood carnally, they lied when they said, “We were never in bondage to any man.”

Denique et Judaei sic intellexerunt, et responderunt ei: non illi qui jam crediderant, sed illi qui in turba erant nondum credentes: responderunt ei, Semen Abrahae sumus, et nemini servivimus unquam; quomodo tu dicis, Liberi eritis? Non autem dixerat Dominus, Liberi eritis; sed, Veritas liberabit vos. In quo tamen verbo illi, quia, sicut dixi, patet in graeco, non intellexerunt nisi libertatem; et extulerunt se quod semen essent Abrahae, et dixerunt, Semen Abrahae sumus; et nemini servivimus unquam; quomodo tu dicis, Liberi eritis? O pellis inflata! Non est ista magnitudo, sed tumor. Et hoc ipsum secundum hujus temporis libertatem quomodo verum dixistis, Nemini servivimus unquam? Joseph non est venumdatus ? Prophetae sancti in captivitatem non sunt ducti ? Deinde, nonne ipse ille est populus qui in Aegypto lateres faciebat, et regibus duris non saltem in auro et argento, sed in luto serviebat ? Si nemini servistis unquam, o ingrati, quid est quod assidue vobis imputat Deus quod vos de domo servitutis liberavit ? An forte patres vestri servierunt, vos autem qui loquimini, nemini unquam servistis? Quomodo ergo solvebatis jam tributa Romanis, unde et ipsi Veritati laqueum quasi captionis proposuistis, ut diceretis, Licet reddere tributum Caesari? ut si dixisset, Licet; teneretis eum quasi male optasset libertati seminis Abrahae: si autem diceret, Non licet; calumniaremini apud reges terrae, quod prohiberet regibus tributa persolvi. Merito prolato nummo victi estis, et captioni vestrae vos ipsi estis respondere compulsi. Ibi enim vobis dictum est, Reddite Caesari quae Caesaris sunt, et Deo quae Dei sunt; cum vos ipsi respondissetis quod nummus haberet imaginem Caesaris . Quia sicut quaerit Caesar in nummo imaginem suam, sic Deus quaerit in homine suam. Haec ergo respondit Judaeis. Movet enim me, fratres, hominum vana superbia, quia etiam de ipsa, quam carnaliter intelligebant, sua libertate mentiti sunt dicentes, Nemini servivimus unquam.

41.3 PL 35, 1693

3. But to the Lord’s own answer, let us give better and more earnest heed, lest we ourselves be also found bondmen. For “Jesus answered them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, that every one who committeth sin is the servant of sin.” He is the servant—would that it were of man, and not of sin! Who will not tremble at such words? The Lord our God grant us, that is, both you and me, that I may speak in fitting terms of this freedom to be sought, and of that bondage to be avoided. “Amen, amen [verily, verily], I say unto you.” The Truth speaks: and in what sense does the Lord our God claim it as His to say, “Amen, amen, I say unto you”? His charge is weighty in so announcing it. In some sort, if lawful to be said, His form of swearing is, “Amen, amen, I say unto you.” Amen in a way may be interpreted, [It is] true [truly, verily]; and yet it is not interpreted, though it might have been said, What is true [verily] I say unto you. Neither the Greek translator nor the Latin has dared to do so; for this word Amen is neither Greek nor Latin, but Hebrew. So it has remained without interpretation, to possess honor as the covering of something hidden; not in order to be disowned, but that it might not, as a thing laid bare to the eye, fall into disrepute. And yet it is not once, but twice uttered by the Lord, “Amen, amen, I say unto you.” And now learn from the very doubling, how much was implied in the charge before us.

Dominus autem quid responderit, hoc potius et intentius audiamus, ne et nos ipsi servi inveniamur. Respondit enim eis Jesus: Amen, amen dico vobis, quia omnis qui facit peccatum, servus est peccati. Servus est, utinam hominis et non peccati. Quis non sub his verbis contremiscat? Praestet nobis Dominus Deus noster, id est et mihi et vobis, ut pro sententia loquar de hac libertate appetenda, et de illa servitute vitanda. Amen, amen dico vobis, Veritas dicit: et quale est Domini Dei nostri dicere, Amen, amen dico vobis? Multum commendat quod ita pronuntiat; quodammodo, si dici fas est, juratio ejus est, Amen, amen dico vobis. Amen quippe interpretatur, Verum: et tamen non est interpretatum, cum potuisset dici, Verum dico vobis. Nec graecus hoc interpres ausus est facere, nec latinus: nam hoc verbum quod est Amen, nec graecum est nec latinum, sed hebraeum. Sic mansit, non est interpretatum, ut honorem haberet velamento secreti: non ut esset negatum, sed ne vilesceret nudatum. Nec semel tamen, sed bis a Domino dictum est, Amen, amen dico vobis. Jam quantum hoc commendatum sit, ex ipsa geminatione cognoscite.

41.4 PL 35, 1694

4. What, then, is the charge given? Verily, verily, I say unto you, saith the Truth who surely, though He had not said, Verily, I say, could not possibly lie. Yet [thereby] He impresses, inculcates His charge, arouses in a way the sleeping, makes them attentive, and would not be contemned. What does He say? “Verily, verily, I say unto you, that every one who committeth sin is the servant of sin.” Miserable slavery! Men frequently, when they suffer under wicked masters, demand to get themselves sold, not seeking to be without a master, but at all events to change him. What can the servant of sin do? To whom can he make his demand? To whom apply for redress? Of whom require himself to be sold? And then at times a man’s slave, worn out by the commands of an unfeeling master, finds rest in flight. Whither can the servant of sin flee? Himself he carries with him wherever he flees. An evil conscience flees not from itself; it has no place to go to; it follows itself. Yea, he cannot withdraw from himself, for the sin he commits is within. He has committed sin to obtain some bodily pleasure. The pleasure passes away; the sin remains. What delighted is gone; the sting has remained behind. Evil bondage! Sometimes men flee to the Church, and we generally permit them, uninstructed as they are—men, wishing to be rid of their master, who are unwilling to be rid of their sins. But sometimes also those subjected to an unlawful and wicked yoke flee for refuge to the Church; for, though free-born men, they are retained in bondage: and an appeal is made to the bishop. And unless he care to put forth every effort to save free-birth from oppression, he is accounted unmerciful. Let us all flee to Christ, and appeal against sin to God as our deliverer. Let us seek to get ourselves sold, that we may be redeemed by His blood. For the Lord says, “Ye were sold for nought, and ye shall be redeemed without money.” Without price, that is, of your own; because of mine. So saith the Lord; for He Himself has paid the price, not in money, but His own blood. Otherwise we had remained both bondmen and indigent.

Quid est ergo commendatum? Verum, verum dico vobis, Veritas dicit; quae utique etsi non diceret, Verum dico, mentiri omnino non posset: tamen commendat, inculcat; dormientes quodammodo excitat, intentos facit, contemni non vult. Quid dicens? Amen, amen dico vobis, quia omnis qui facit peccatum, servus est peccati. O miserabilis servitus! Plerumque homines cum dominos malos patiuntur, venales se petunt; non quaerentes dominum non habere, sed saltem mutare; servus peccati quid faciat? quem interpellet? apud quem interpellet? apud quem se venalem petat? Deinde servus hominis aliquando sui domini duris imperiis fatigatus, fugiendo requiescit: servus peccati quo fugit? Secum se trahit quocumque fugerit. Non fugit seipsam mala conscientia, non est quo eat, sequitur se; imo non recedit a se: peccatum enim quod facit, intus est. Fecit peccatum, ut aliquam corporalem caperet voluptatem: voluptas transit, peccatum manet; praeteriit quod delectabat, remansit quod pungat. Mala servitus! Aliquando fugiunt homines ad Ecclesiam, et plerumque eos patimur tanquam indisciplinatos: volentes carere dominis, qui nolunt carere peccatis. Aliquando autem etiam illicito jugo et improbo subjecti fugiunt ad Ecclesiam, quia retinentur ingenui ad servitutem, et interpellatur episcopus: et nisi curet operam impendere, ne ingenuitas opprimatur, immisericors deputatur. Ad Christum omnes fugiamus, contra peccatum Deum liberatorem interpellemus: venales nos petamus, ut ejus sanguine redimamur. Dicit enim Dominus, Gratis venumdati estis, et sine argento redimemini . Sine pretio, sed vestro; quia meo. Hoc Dominus dicit: ipse enim pretium dedit, non argentum, sed sanguinem suum. Nam nos et servi et egeni remanseramus.

41.5 PL 35, 1694

5. From this bondage, then, we are set free by the Lord alone. He who had it not, Himself delivers us from it; for He alone came without sin in the flesh. For the little ones whom you see carried in their mothers’ hands cannot yet walk, and are already in fetters; for they have received from Adam what they are loosened from by Christ. To them also, when baptized, pertains that grace which is promised by the Lord; for He only can deliver from sin who came without sin, and was made a sacrifice for sin. For you heard when the apostle was read: “We are ambassadors,” he says, “for Christ, as though God were exhorting you by us; we beseech you in Christ’s stead,”—that is, as if Christ were beseeching you, and for what?—“to be reconciled unto God.” If the apostle exhorts and beseeches us to be reconciled unto God, then were we enemies to God. For no one is reconciled unless from a state of enmity. And we have become enemies not by nature, but by sin. From the same source are we the servants of sin, that we are the enemies of God. God has no enemies in a state of freedom. They must be slaves; and slaves will they remain unless delivered by Him to whom they wished by their sins to be enemies. Therefore, says be, “We beseech you in Christ’s stead to be reconciled unto God.” But how are we reconciled, save by the removal of that which separates between us and Himself? For He says by the prophet, “He hath not made the ear heavy that it should not hear; but your iniquities have separated between you and your God.” And so, then, we are not reconciled, unless that which is in the midst is taken away, and something else is put in its place. For there is a separating medium, and, on the other hand, there is a reconciling Mediator. The separating medium is sin, the reconciling Mediator is the Lord Jesus Christ: “For there is one God and Mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.” To take then away the separating wall, which is sin, that Mediator has come, and the priest has Himself become the sacrifice. And because He was made a sacrifice for sin, offering Himself as a whole burnt-offering on the cross of His passion, the apostle, after saying, “We beseech you in Christ’s stead to be reconciled unto God,”—as if we had said, How shall we be able to be reconciled?—goes on to say, “He hath made Him,” that is, Christ Himself, “who knew no sin, [to be] sin for us, that we may be the righteousness of God in Him,” “Him,” he says, Christ Himself our God, “who knew no sin.” For He came in the flesh, that is, in the likeness of sinful flesh, but not in sinful flesh, because He had no sin at all; and therefore became a true sacrifice for sin, because He Himself had no sin.

Liberat ergo ab hac servitute solus Dominus: qui illam non habuit, ipse de illa liberat; solus enim in hac carne venit sine peccato. Nam quos videtis in manibus matrum parvulos ferri, nondum ambulant, et jam sunt compediti; traxerunt enim de Adam quod solvatur a Christo. Pertinet etiam ad ipsos, cum baptizantur, ista gratia quam Dominus pollicetur; quia de peccato solus liberare potest, qui venit sine peccato, et factus est sacrificium pro peccato. Audistis enim cum Apostolus legeretur: Pro Christo, inquit, legatione fungimur, tanquam Deo exhortante per nos; obsecramus pro Christo; id est, tanquam vos Christus obsecret. Quid? Reconciliari Deo. Si exhortatur et obsecrat Apostolus ut reconciliemur Deo, inimici eramus Deo. Nemo enim reconciliatur nisi ex inimicitiis. Inimicos autem nos non natura, sed peccata fecerunt. Unde inimici illius, inde servi peccati. Non habet Deus liberos inimicos; necesse est servi sint: et servi remanebunt nisi ab illo liberentur, cui peccando inimici esse voluerunt. Obsecramus ergo, inquit, pro Christo, reconciliari Deo. Quomodo autem reconciliamur, nisi solvatur quod inter nos et ipsum separat? Ait enim per prophetam: Non gravavit aurem ne audiat, sed peccata vestra separant inter vos et Deum . Quia ergo non reconciliamur nisi ablato quod in medio est, et posito quod in medio sit. Est enim medium separans, sed contra est mediator reconcilians; medium separans est peccatum, mediator reconcilians est Dominus Jesus Christus: Unus enim Deus, et unus mediator Dei et hominum, homo Christus Jesus . Ut ergo tollatur maceria separans quod est peccatum, venit ille mediator, et factus est sacrificium sacerdos ipse. Et quia sacrificium factus est pro peccato, offerens seipsum in holocaustum in cruce passionis suae, sequitur Apostolus et dicit, cum dixisset, Obsecramus pro Christo, reconciliari Deo: quasi diceremus, quomodo poterimus reconciliari? Eum, inquit, id est ipsum Christum, qui non noverat peccatum, peccatum pro nobis fecit, ut nos simus justitia Dei in ipso . Eum ipsum, inquit, Christum Deum, qui non noverat peccatum. Venit enim in carne, hoc est in similitudine carnis peccati , non tamen in carne peccati, non habens ullum omnino peccatum: et ideo factus est verum sacrificium pro peccato, quia nullum habebat ipse peccatum.

41.6 PL 35, 1695

6. But perhaps, through some special perception of my own, I have said that sin is a sacrifice for sin. Let those who have read it be free to acknowledge it; let not those who have not read it be backward; let them not, I say, be backward to read, that they may be truthful in judging. For when God gave commandment about the offering of sacrifices for sin, in which sacrifices there was no expiation of sins, but the shadow of things to come, the self-same sacrifices, the self-same offerings, the self-same victims, the self-same animals, which were brought forward to be slain for sins, and in whose blood that [true] blood was prefigured, are themselves called sinsby the law; and that to such an extent that in certain passages it is written in these terms, that the priests, when about to sacrifice, were to lay their hands on the head of the sin, that is, on the head of the victim about to be sacrificed for sin. Such sin, then, that is, such a sacrifice for sin, was our Lord Jesus Christ made, “who knew no sin.”

Sed forte de sensu meo dixi, quia peccatum sacrificium est pro peccato. Qui legerunt, agnoscant; qui non legerunt, non sint pigri: non sint, inquam, pigri ad legendum, ut veraces sint ad judicandum. Cum de sacrificiis enim praeciperet Deus offerendis pro peccato, in quibus sacrificiis non erat expiatio peccatorum, sed umbra futurorum, eadem ipsa sacrificia, easdem ipsas hostias, easdem ipsas victimas, eadem ipsa animalia quae admovebantur mactanda pro peccatis, in quorum sanguine sanguis ille figurabatur, peccata Lex appellat: usque adeo ut in quibusdam locis scriptum sit ita, ut sacerdotes immolaturi ponerent manus suas super caput peccati, id est, super caput victimae immolandae pro peccato. Tale ergo peccatum, id est, sacrificium pro peccato, factus est Dominus noster Jesus Christus, qui non noverat peccatum.

41.7 PL 35, 1696

7. With efficacious merit does He deliver from this bondage of sin, who saith in the psalms: “I am become as a man without help, free among the dead.” For He only was free, because He had no sin. For He Himself says in the Gospel, “Behold, the prince of this world cometh,” meaning the devil about to come in the persons of the persecuting Jews;—“behold,” He says, “he cometh, and shall find nothing in me.” Not as he found some measure of sin in those whom he also slew as righteous; in me he shall find nothing. And just as if He were asked, If he shall find nothing in Thee, wherefore will he slay Thee? He further said, “But that all may know that I do the will of my Father, rise and let us go hence.” I do not, He says, pay the penalty of death as a necessity of my sinfulness; but in the death I die, I do the will of my Father. And in this, I am doing rather than enduring it; for, were I unwilling, I should not have had the suffering to endure. You have Him saying in another place, “I have power to lay down my life, and I have power to take it up again.” Here surely is one “free among the dead.”

Merito liberat ab hac servitute peccati ille qui dicit in Psalmis: Factus sum tanquam homo sine adjutorio, inter mortuos liber . Solus enim liber, quia non habebat peccatum. Ipse enim dicit in Evangelio: Ecce venit princeps hujus mundi, diabolum significans venturum in Judaeis persecutoribus; ecce, inquit, venit, et in me nihil inveniet . Non quomodo in eis quos occidit etiam justos, invenit qualecumque peccatum, in me nihil inveniet. Et tanquam ei diceretur, si nihil in te inveniet, quare te occidet? Subjecit, et ait: Sed ut sciant omnes quia voluntatem Patris mei facio, surgite, eamus hinc. Non, inquit, mortem mei peccati necessitate persolvo, sed in eo quod morior, voluntatem Patris mei facio: plusque ibi facio quam patior, quia si nollem, nec passus essem. Habes illum alio loco dicentem, Potestatem habeo ponendi animam meam, et potestatem habeo iterum sumendi eam. . Ecce vere in mortuis liber.

41.8 PL 35, 1696

8. Since, then, every one that committeth sin is the servant of sin, listen to what is our hope of liberty. “And the servant,” He says, “abideth not in the house for ever.” The church is the house, the servant is the sinner. Many sinners enter the church. Accordingly He has not said, “The servant” is not in the house, but “abideth not in the house for ever.” If, then, there shall be no servant there, who will be there? For “when” as the Scripture speaketh, “the righteous king sitteth on the throne, who will boast of having a clean heart? or who will boast that he is pure from his sin?” He has greatly alarmed us, my brethren, by saying, “The servant abideth not in the house for ever.” But He further adds, “But the Son abideth ever.” Will Christ, then, be alone in His house? Will no people remain at His side? Whose head will He be, if there shall be no body? Or is the Son all this, both the head and the body? For it is not without cause that He has inspired both terror and hope: terror, in order that we should not love sin; and hope, that we should not be distrustful of the remission of sin. “Every one,” He says, “that committeth sin is the servant of sin. And the servant abideth not in the house for ever.” What hope, then, have we, who are not without sin? Listen to thy hope: “The Son abideth for ever. If the Son, therefore, shall make you free, then shall ye be free indeed.” Our hope is this, brethren, to be made free by the free One; and that, in setting us free, He may make us His servants. For we were the servants of lust; but being set free, we are made the servants of love. This also the apostle says: “For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another.” Let not then the Christian say, I am free; I have been called unto liberty: I was a slave, but have been redeemed, and by my very redemption have been made free, I shall do what I please: no one may balk me of my will, if I am free. But if thou committest sin with such a will, thou art the servant of sin. Do not then abuse your liberty for freedom in sinning, but use it for the purpose of sinning not. For only if thy will is pious, will it be free. Thou wilt be free, if thou art a servant still,—free from sin, the servant of righteous ness: as the apostle says, “When ye were the servants of sin, ye were free from righteousness. But now, being made free from sin, and become servants to God, ye have your fruit unto holiness, and the end everlasting life.” Let us be striving after the latter, and be doing the other.

Cum ergo omnis qui facit peccatum, servus sit peccati, quae sit spes nobis libertatis, audite. Servus autem, inquit, non manet in domo in aeternum. Ecclesia est domus, servus peccator est. Intrant multi in Ecclesiam peccatores. Non ergo dixit, Servus non est in domo; sed, non manet in domo in aeternum. Si ergo nullus ibi servus erit, quis ibi erit? Cum enim rex justus sederit in throno, sicut Scriptura loquitur, quis gloriabitur castum se habere cor? aut quis gloriabitur mundum se esse a peccato ? Multum nos terruit, o fratres mei, dicendo, Servus non manet in domo in aeternum. Adjungit autem, et dicit, Filius autem manet in aeternum. Ergo solus in domo sua erit Christus? nullus illi populus cohaerebit? Cui erit caput, si non erit corpus? An forte totum hoc Filius, caput et corpus? Non enim sine causa et terruit, et spem dedit: terruit, ne peccatum amaremus; spem dedit, ne de peccati solutione diffideremus: Omnis, inquit, qui facit peccatum, servus est peccati. Servus autem non manet in domo in aeternum. Quae ergo nobis spes est, qui non sumus sine peccato? Audi spem tuam; Filius manet in aeternum. Si ergo vos Filius liberaverit, tunc vere liberi eritis. Haec spes nostra est, fratres, ut a libero liberemur, et liberando servos nos faciat: servi enim eramus cupiditatis, liberati servi efficimur charitatis. Hoc et Apostolus dicit: Vos autem fratres in libertatem vocati estis; tantum ne libertatem in occasionem carnis detis, sed per charitatem servite invicem . Non ergo dicat christianus: Liber sum, in libertatem vocatus sum: servus eram, sed redemptus sum, et ipsa redemptione liber effectus sum, faciam quod volo; nemo me prohibeat a voluntate mea, si liber sum. Sed si ista voluntate peccatum facis, servus es peccati. Noli ergo libertate abuti ad libere peccandum, sed utere ad non peccandum. Erit enim voluntas tua libera, si fuerit pia. Eris liber, si fueris servus; liber peccati, servus justitiae: dicente Apostolo, Cum servi essetis peccati, liberi eratis justitiae: nunc autem liberati a peccato, servi autem facti Deo, habetis fructum vestrum in sanctificationem, finem vero vitam aeternam . Hoc conemur, id agamus.

41.9 PL 35, 1697

9. The first stage of liberty is to be free from crimes. Give heed, my brethren, give heed, that I may not by any means mislead your understanding as to the nature of that liberty at present, and what it will be. Sift any one soever of the highest integrity in this life, and however worthy he may already be of the name of upright, yet is he not without sin. Listen to Saint John himself, the author of the Gospel before us, when he says in his epistle, “If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.” He alone could say this who was “free among the dead:” of Him only could it be said, who knew no sin. It could be said only of Him, for He also “was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin.” He alone could say, “Behold, the prince of this world cometh, and shall find nothing in me.” Sift any one else, who is accounted righteous, yet is he not in all respects without sin; not even such as was Job, to whom the Lord bore such testimony, that the devil was filled with envy, and demanded that he should be tempted, and was himself defeated in the temptation, to the end that Job might be proved. And he was proved for this reason, not that the certainty of his carrying off the conqueror’s wreath was unknown to God, but that he might become known as an object of imitation to others. And what says Job himself? “For who is clean? not even the infant whose life is but a day’s span upon the earth.” But it is plain that many are called righteous without opposition, because the term is understood as meaning, free from crime; for in human affairs there is no just ground of complaint attaching to those who are free from criminal conduct. But crime is grievous sin, deserving in the highest measure to be denounced and condemned. Not, however, that God condemns certain sins, and justifies and praises certain others. He approves of none. He hates them all. As the physician dislikes the ailment of the ailing, and works by his healing measures to get the ailment removed and the ailing relieved; so God by his grace worketh in us, that sin may be consumed, and man made free. But when, you will be saying, is it consumed? If it is lessened, why is it not consumed? That is growing less in the life of those who are advancing onwards, which is consumed in the life of those who have attained to perfection.

Prima libertas est carere criminibus. Intendite, fratres mei, intendite; ne forte possim perducere vobis ad sensum et qualis modo sit, et qualis futura sit ista libertas. Quemlibet valde justum discutias in hac vita, quamvis jam sit dignus justi vocabulo, non est tamen sine peccato: audi ipsum sanctum Joannem, cujus et hoc Evangelium est, in Epistola sua dicentem, Si dixerimus, inquit, quia peccatum non habemus, nos ipsos decipimus, et veritas in nobis non est . Solus hoc dicere potuit in mortuis liber, de solo dici potuit qui non noverat peccatum; de solo dici potuit: etenim expertus est omnia secundum similitudinem sine peccato . Solus dicere potuit, Ecce veniet princeps mundi, et in me nihil inveniet. Quemcumque alium licet justum discusseris, non omnimodo est sine peccato. Nec qualis erat Job, cui Dominus tale testimonium perhibebat, ut diabolus invideret, et postularet tentandum, tentans superaretur, ut ille probaretur . Ideo autem ille probatus est, non quia latebat Deum coronandus, sed ut innotesceret hominibus imitandus. Etiam ipse Job quid dicit? Quis enim mundus? Nec infans, cujus est unius diei vita super terram . Sed plane multi justi dicti sunt sine querela, quod intelligitur sine crimine: nulla enim querela justa est de his in rebus humanis, qui non habent crimen. Crimen autem est peccatum grave, accusatione et damnatione dignissimum. Non ergo Deus quaedam peccata damnat, quaedam justificat et laudat: nulla laudat, odit omnia. Quomodo odit medicus aegritudinem aegroti, et id agit curando ut aegritudo pellatur, aeger levetur: sic Deus gratia sua hoc in nobis agit, ut peccatum consumatur, homo liberetur. Sed quando consumitur, inquies? Si minuitur, quare non consumitur? Minuitur autem in vita proficientium, quod in vita consumitur perfectorum.

41.10 PL 35, 1697

10. The first stage of liberty, then, is to be free from crimes [sinful conduct]. And so the Apostle Paul, when he determined on the ordination of either elders or deacons, or whoever was to be ordained to the superintendence of the Church, says not, If any one is without sin; for had he said so, every one would be rejected as unfit, none would be ordained: but he says, “If any one is without crime” [E.V. blame], such as, murder, adultery, any uncleanness of fornication, theft, fraud, sacrilege, and others of that sort. When a man has begun to be free from these (and every Christian man ought to be so), he begins to raise his head to liberty; but that is liberty begun, not completed. Why, says some one, is it not completed liberty? Because, “I see another law in my members warring against the law of my mind;” “for what I would,” he says, “that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.” “The flesh,” he says, “lusteth against the spirit, and the spirit against the flesh; so that ye do not the things that ye would.” In part liberty, in part bondage: not yet entire, not yet pure, not yet full liberty, because not yet eternity. For we have still infirmity in part, in part we have attained to liberty. Whatever has been our sin, was previously wiped out in baptism. But because all our iniquity has been blotted out, has there remained no infirmity? If there had not, we should be living here without sin. Yet who would venture to say so, but the proud, but the man unworthy of the Deliverer’s mercy, but he who wishes to be self-deceived, and who is destitute of the truth? Hence, from the fact that some infirmity remains, I venture to say that, in what measure we serve God, we are free; in what measure we serve the law of sin, we are still in bondage. Hence says the apostle, what we began to say, “I delight in the law of God after the inward man.” Here then it is, wherein we are free, wherein we delight in the law of God; for liberty has joy. For as long as it is from fear that thou doest what is right, God is no delight to thee. Find thy delight in Him, and thou art free. Fear not punishment, but love righteousness. Art thou not yet able to love righteousness? Fear even punishment, that thou mayest attain to the love of righteousness.

Prima est ergo libertas, carere criminibus. Ideo et apostolus Paulus quando elegit ordinandos vel presbyteros vel diaconos, et quicumque ordinandus est ad praeposituram Ecclesiae, non ait, Si quis sine peccato est; hoc enim si diceret, omnis homo reprobaretur, nullus ordinaretur: sed ait, Si quis sine crimine est , sicuti est homicidium, adulterium, aliqua immunditia fornicationis, furtum, fraus, sacrilegium, et caetera hujusmodi. Cum coeperit ea non habere homo (debet autem non habere omnis christianus homo), incipit caput erigere ad libertatem: sed ista inchoata est, non perfecta libertas. Quare, inquit aliquis, non est perfecta libertas? Quia « video aliam legem in membris meis, repugnantem legi mentis meae: non enim quod volo ago, ait, sed quod odi illud facio » . « Caro, inquit, concupiscit adversus spiritum, et spiritus adversus carnem, ut non ea quae vultis illa faciatis. » Ex parte libertas, ex parte servitus: nondum tota, nondum pura, nondum plena libertas, quia nondum aeternitas. Habemus enim ex parte infirmitatem, ex parte accepimus libertatem. Quidquid peccatum est a nobis, antea deletum est in Baptismo. Numquid quia deleta est tota iniquitas, nulla remansit infirmitas? Si non remansisset, sine peccato hic viveremus. Quis autem audeat hoc dicere nisi superbus, nisi misericordia liberatoris indignus, nisi qui seipsum vult decipere, et in quo veritas non est? Ergo ex eo quod remansit aliquid infirmitatis, audeo dicere, ex qua parte servimus Deo, liberi sumus: ex qua parte servimus legi peccati, adhuc servi sumus. Unde dicit Apostolus quod dicere coeperamus: Condelector legi Dei secundum interiorem hominem. Ecce unde liberi, unde condelectamur legi Dei: libertas enim delectat. Nam quamdiu timore facis quod justum est, non Deus te delectat. Quamdiu adhuc servus facis, te non delectat: delectet te, et liber es. Noli timere poenam, sed ama justitiam. Nondum potes amare justitiam? time vel poenam, ut pervenias ad amandam justitiam.

41.11 PL 35, 1698

11. In the measure then spoken of above, he felt himself to be already free, and there fore said, “I delight in the law of God after the inward man.” I delight in the law, I delight in its requirements, I delight in righteousness itself. “But I see another law in my members”—this infirmity which remains—“warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin, which is in my members.” On this side he feels his captivity, where righteousness has not been perfected; for where he delights in the law of God, he is not the captive but the friend of the law; and therefore free, because a friend. What then is to be done with that which so remains? What, but to look to Him who has said, “If the Son shall make you free, then shall ye be free indeed”? Indeed he also who thus spake so looked to Him: “O wretched man that I am,” he says, “who shall deliver me from the body of this death? I thank God, through Jesus Christ our Lord.” Therefore “if the Son shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.” And then he concluded thus: “So then, with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.” I myself, he says; for there are not two of us contrary to each other, coming from different origins; but “with the mind I myself serve the law of God, and with the flesh the law of sin,” so long as languor struggles against salvation.

Ergo jam ille ex parte superiore liberum se esse sentiebat, unde dicebat, Condelector legi Dei secundum interiorem hominem. Delectat me lex, delectat me quod jubet lex, delectat me ipsa justitia. Video autem aliam legem in membris meis: haec est quae remansit infirmitas: repugnantem legi mentis meae, et captivantem me in lege peccati, quae est in membris meis. Ex hac parte sentit captivitatem, ubi non est impleta justitia: nam ubi condelectatur legi Dei, non captivus, sed legis amicus est; et ideo liber, quod amicus. Quid ergo ex eo quod restat? Quid, nisi respiciamus ad illum qui dixit, Si vos Filius liberaverit, tunc vere liberi eritis? Denique et ipse qui loquebatur, ad illum respexit: « Infelix ego homo, quis me liberabit, inquit, de corpore mortis hujus? Gratia Dei per Jesum Christum Dominum nostrum. Ergo si vos Filius liberaverit, tunc vere liberi eritis. » Denique ita conclusit: « Igitur ipse ego mente servio legi Dei, carne autem legi peccati » . Ipse ego, inquit: non enim duo sumus inter nos contrarii de diversis principiis venientes; sed ego ipse mente servio legi Dei, carne autem legi peccati, quamdiu languor obluctatur saluti.

41.12 PL 35, 1698

12. But if with the flesh thou servest the law of sin, do as the apostle himself says: “Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, that ye should obey it in the lust thereof: neither yield ye your members as weapons of unrighteousness unto sin.” He says not, Let it not be; but, “Let it not reign.” So long as sin must be in thy members, let its reigning power at least be taken away, let not its demands be obeyed. Does anger rise? Yield not up thy tongue to anger for the purpose of evil-speaking; yield not up thy hand or foot to anger for the purpose of striking. That irrational anger would not rise, were there no sin in the members. But take away its ruling power; let it have no weapons wherewith to fight against thee. Then also it will learn not to rise, when it begins to find the lack of weapons. “Yield not your members as weapons of unrighteousness unto sin,” else will ye be entirely captive, and there will be no room to say, “With the mind I serve the law of God.” For if the mind keep possession of the weapons, the members are not roused to the service of raging sin. Let the inward ruler keep possession of the citadel, because it stands there under a greater ruler, and is certain of assistance. Let it bridle anger; let it restrain evil desire. There is within something that needs bridling, that needs restraining, that needs to be kept in command. And what did that righteous man wish, who with the mind was serving the law of God, but that there should be a complete deliverance from that which needed to be bridled? And this ought every one to be striving after who is aiming at perfection, that lust itself also, no longer receiving the obedience of the members, may every day be lessened in the advancing pilgrim. “To will,” he says, “is present with me; but not so, how to perfect that which is good.” Has he said, To do good is not present with me? Had he said so, hope would be wanting. He does not say, To do is not present with me, but, “To perfect is not present with me.” For what is the perfecting of good, but the elimination and end of evil? And what is the elimination of evil, but what the law says, “Thou shalt not lust [covet]”? To lust not at all is the perfecting of good, because it is the eliminating of evil. This he said, “To perfect that which is good is not present with me,” because his doing could not get the length of setting him free from lust. He labored only to bridle lust, to refuse consent to lust, and not to yield his members to its service. “To perfect,” then, he says, “that which is good is not present with me.” I cannot fulfill the commandment, “Thou shalt not lust.” What then is needed? To fulfill this: “Go not after thy lusts.” Do this meanwhile so long as unlawful lusts are present in thy flesh; “Go not after thy lusts.” Abide in the service of God, in the liberty of Christ. With the mind serve the law of thy God. Yield not thyself to thy lusts. By following them, thou addest to their strength. By giving them strength, how canst thou conquer, when on thine own strength thou art nourishing enemies against thyself?

Sed si carne servis legi peccati, fac quod ait ipse Apostolus: Non ergo regnet peccatum in vestro mortali corpore ad obediendum desideriis ejus, neque exhibeatis membra vestra arma iniquitatis peccato . Non ait, Non sit; sed, Non regnet. Quamdiu peccatum necesse est esse in membris tuis, saltem illi regnum auferatur, non fiat quod jubet. Surgit ira? noli dare irae linguam ad maledicendum; noli dare irae manum aut pedem ad feriendum. Non surgeret ira ista irrationabilis, nisi peccatum esset in membris: sed tolle illi regnum, non habeat arma unde contra te pugnet; discet etiam non surgere, cum arma coeperit non invenire. Non exhibeatis membra vestra arma iniquitatis peccato; alioquin toti captivi eritis, et non erit dicere, Mente servio legi Dei. Mens enim si teneat arma, membra non moventur in ministerium furentis peccati. Teneat arcem imperator interior, quia sub majore imperatore juvandus assistit; frenet iram, coerceat concupiscentiam. Inest tamen quod frenetur, inest quod coerceatur, inest quod teneatur. Quid autem volebat ille justus mente serviens legi Dei, nisi ut omnino non esset quod frenaretur? Et hoc debet conari omnis qui tendit ad perfectionem, ut et ipsa concupiscentia cui non dantur ad obediendum membra, quotidie in proficiente minuatur. Velle, inquit, adjacet mihi, perficere autem bonum non . Numquid dixit, Non mihi adjacet facere bonum? Si hoc dixisset, spes nulla esset. Non ait, Non mihi adjacet facere, sed, Non mihi adjacet perficere. Quae est enim perfectio boni, nisi consumptio et finis mali? Quae est autem consumptio mali, nisi quod Lex dicit, Non concupisces ? Omnino non concupiscere perfectio boni est, quia consumptio mali est. Hoc dicebat ille, Perficere bonum non mihi adjacet; quia non poterat facere ut non concupisceret: faciebat tantum ut concupiscentiam refrenaret, ut concupiscentiae non consentiret, et concupiscentiae membra ad satellitium non praeberet. Perficere ergo, inquit, bonum non mihi adjacet: non possum implere quod dictum est, Non concupisces. Quid ergo opus est? Ut impleas, Post concupiscentias tuas non eas . Hoc age interim quamdiu insunt illicitae concupiscentiae in carne tua, Post concupiscentias tuas non eas. Mane in servitute Dei, in libertate Christi; mente servi legi Dei tui. Noli te dare concupiscentiis tuis: sequendo eas, vires eis addis; dando eis vires quomodo vineis, quando contra te inimicos nutris viribus tuis?

41.13 PL 35, 1699

13. What then is that full and perfect liberty in the Lord Jesus, who said, “If the Son shall make you free, then shall ye be free indeed;” and when shall it be a full and perfect liberty? When enmities are no more; when “death, the last enemy, shall be destroyed.” “For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.—And when this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory. O death, where is thy struggle?” What is this, “O death, where is thy struggle”? “The flesh lusteth against the spirit, and the spirit against the flesh,” but only when the flesh of sin was in vigor. “O death, where is [now] thy struggle?” Now shall we live, no more shall we die, in Him who died for us and rose again: “that they,” he says, “who live, should no longer live unto themselves, but unto Him who died for them and rose again.” Let us be praying, as those who are wounded, for the physician; let us be carried into the inn to be healed. For it is He who promises salvation, who pitied the man left half-alive on the road by robbers. He poured in oil and wine, He healed the wounds, He put him on his beast, He took him to the inn, He commended him to the innkeeper’s care. To what innkeeper? Perhaps to him who said, “We are ambassadors for Christ.” He gave also two pence to pay for the healing of the wounded man. And perhaps these are the two commandments, on which hang all the law and the prophets. Therefore, brethren, is the Church also, wherein the wounded is healed meanwhile, the traveller’s inn; but above the Church itself, lies the possessor’s inheritance.

Quae igitur libertas plena atque perfecta in illo Domino Jesu qui dixit, Si vos Filius liberaverit, tunc vere liberi eritis; quando plena et perfecta libertas erit? Quando nullae inimicitiae, quando « novissima inimica destruetur mors. Oportet enim corruptible hoc induere incorruptionem, et mortale hoc induere immortalitatem: cum autem mortale hoc induerit immortalitatem, tunc fiet sermo qui scriptus est, Absorpta est mors in victoriam. Ubi est, mors, contentio tua » ? Quid est, Ubi est, mors, contentio tua? Caro concupiscebat adversus spiritum, et spiritus adversus carnem, sed quando peccati caro vigebat. Ubi est, mors, contentio tua? Jam vivemus, jam non moriemur, in illo qui pro nobis mortuus est et resurrexit: ut qui vivunt, inquit, jam non sibi vivant, sed ei qui pro ipsis mortuus est et resurrexit . Precemur medicum saucii, portemur in stabulum curandi. Ille est enim qui promittit sanitatem, qui miseratus est in via semivivum a latronibus derelictum: infudit oleum et vinum, curavit vulnera, levavit in jumentum, perduxit in stabulum, stabulario commendavit. Cui stabulario? Forte illi qui dixit, Pro Christo legatione fungimur . Dedit etiam duos nummos, qui impenderentur saucio curando : forte ipsa sunt duo praecepta, in quibus tota Lex pendet et Prophetae . Ergo, fratres, et Ecclesia hoc tempore, in qua saucius sanatur, stabulum est viatoris: sed ipsi Ecclesiae sursum est haereditas possessoris.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Save for later

Enter your email and we will send you a sign-in link. No password. What you save (articles, verses, chapters, documents) follows you to any device.