Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 23

sant'Agostino d'Ippona (354–430 d.C.) · In Joannis evangelium tractatus CXXIV · PL 35, 1379–1976

23.1 Chapter V. 19–40 PL 35, 1582

1. In a certain place in the Gospel, the Lord says that the prudent hearer of His word ought to be like a man who, wishing to build a house, digs deeply until he comes to the foundation of stability on the rock, and there establishes in security what he builds against the violence of the flood; so that, when the flood comes, it may be rather beaten back by the strength of the building. than bring ruin on that house by the force of its pressure. Let us regard the Scripture of God to be, as it were, the field where we wish to build something. Let us not be slothful, nor be content with the surface; let us dig deeply until we come to the rock: “And that rock was Christ.”

Quodam loco in Evangelio Dominus ait, prudentem auditorem verbi sui similem esse debere homini qui volens aedificare, fodit altius, donec perveniat ad fundamentum stabilitatis petrae, et ibi securus constituat quod fabricat adversus impetum fluminis: ut cum venerit, repercutiatur potius firmitate aedificii, quam impulsu suo ruinam faciat illi domui . Putemus Scripturam Dei tanquam agrum esse, ubi volumus aliquid aedificare. Non simus pigri, nec superficie contenti; fodiamus altius, donec perveniamus ad petram: Petra autem erat Christus .

23.2 PL 35, 1582

2. The passage read to-day has spoken to us of the witness of the Lord, that He does not hold the witness of men necessary, but has a greater witness than men; and He has told us what this witness is: “The works,” saith He, “which I do bear witness of me.” Then He added, “And the Father that sent me beareth witness of me.” The very works also which He doeth, He says that He has received from the Father. The works, therefore, bear witness, the Father bears witness. Has John borne no witness? He did clearly bear witness, but as a lamp; not to satisfy friends, but to confound enemies: for it had been predicted long before by the person of the Father, “I have prepared a lamp for mine Anointed: I will clothe His enemies with confusion; but upon Him shall flourish my sanctification.” Be it that thou wert left in the dark in the night-time, thou didst direct thy attention to the lamp, thou didst admire the lamp, and didst exult at its light. But that lamp says that there is a sun, in which thou oughtest to exult; and though it burns in the night, it bids thee to be looking out for the day. Therefore it is not the case that there was no need of that man’s testimony. For wherefore was he sent, if there was no need of him? But, on the contrary, lest man should stay at the lamp, and think the light of the lamp to be sufficient for him, therefore the Lord neither says that this lamp had been superfluous, nor yet doth He say that thou oughtest to stay at the lamp. The Scripture of God utters another testimony: there undoubtedly God hath borne witness to His Son, and in that Scripture the Jews had placed their hope,—namely, in the law of God, given by Moses His servant. “Search the Scripture,” saith He, “in which ye think ye have eternal life: the same bears witness of me; and ye will not come to me that ye may have life.” Why do ye think that in the Scripture ye have eternal life? Ask itself to whom does it bear witness, and understand what is eternal life. And because for the sake of Moses they were willing to reject Christ, as an adversary to the ordinances and precepts of Moses, He convicts those same men as by another lamp.

Hodierna lectio de testimonio Domini nobis locuta est, quia non habeat necessarium ab hominibus testimonium, sed habeat majus quam sunt homines; atque id testimonium dixit quid sit: Opera, inquit, quae ego facio, testimonium perhibent de me. Deinde adjunxit: Et testimonium perhibet de me, qui misit me Pater. Ipsa quoque opera quae facit, a Patre se accepisse dicit. Testimonium ergo perhibent opera, testimonium perhibet Pater. Nullumne testimonium perhibuit Joannes? Perhibuit plane, sed tanquam lucerna, non ad satiandos amicos, sed ad confundendos inimices: jam enim antea praedictum erat a persona Patris, Paravi lucernam Christo meo; inimicos ejus induam confusione; super ipsum autem efflorebit sanctificatio mea . Esto tanquam in nocte positus, attendisti in lucernam, et miratus es lucernam, et exsultasti ad lumen lucernae: sed illa lucerna dicit esse solem, in quo exsultare debeas; et quamvis ardeat in nocte, diem te jubet exspectare. Non ergo quia illius hominis testimonio non erat opus. Nam utquid mitteretur, si non erat opus? Sed ne in lucerna remaneat homo, et lumen lucernae sufficere sibi arbitretur; ideo Dominus nec lucernam illam superfluam dicit fuisse, nec tamen te dicit in lucerna debere remanere. Dicit aliud testimonium Scriptura Dei: ibi utique Deus perhibuit testimonium Filio suo, et in illa Scriptura Judaei spem posuerant, in Lege scilicet Dei, ministrata sibi per Moysen famulum Dei. Scrutamini, inquit, Scripturam, in qua vos putatis vitam aeternam habere; ipsa testimonium perhibet de me: et non vultis venire ad me, ut vitam habeatis. Quid vos putatis habere in Scriptura vitam aeternam? Ipsam interrogate, cui perhibet testimonium; et intelligite quae sit vita aeterna. Et quia propter Moysen volebant repudiare Christum, tanquam adversarium institutis praeceptisque Moysi; rursus eosdem ipse convincit tanquam de alia lucerna.

23.3 PL 35, 1583

3. For, indeed, all men are lamps, since they can be both lighted and extinguished. Moreover, when the lamps are wise, they shine and glow with the Spirit; yet also, if they did burn and are put out, they even stink. The servants of God remain good lamps by the oil of His mercy, not by their own strength. The free grace of God, truly, is the oil of the lamps. “For I have labored more than they all,” saith a certain lamp; and lest he should seem to burn by his own strength, he added, “But not I, but the grace of God that was with me.” All prophecy, therefore, before the coming of the Lord, is a lamp. Of this lamp the Apostle Peter says: “We have a more sure word of prophecy, to which ye do well giving heed, as unto a lamp shining in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day-star arise in your hearts.” Accordingly the prophets are lamps, and all prophecy one great lamp. What of the apostles? Are not they, too, lamps? They are, clearly. He alone is not a lamp. For He is not lighted and put out; because “even as the Father hath life in Himself, so hath He given to the Son to have life in Himself.” The apostles also, I say, are lamps; and they give thanks because they were both lighted by the light of truth, and are burning with the spirit of charity, and supplied with the oil of God’s grace. If they were not lamps, the Lord would not say to them, “Ye are the light of the world.” For after He said, “Ye are the light of the world,” He shows that they should not think themselves such a light as that of which it is said, “That was the true light, that enlighteneth every man coming into this world.” But this was said of the Lord at that time when He was distinguished from John (the Baptist). Of John the Baptist, indeed, it had been said, “He was not the light, but that he might bear witness of the light.” And lest thou shouldst say, How was he not the light, of whom Christ says that “he was a lamp”?—I answer, In comparison of the other light, he was not light. For “that was the true light that enlighteneth every man coming into this world.” Accordingly, when He said also to the disciples, “Ye are the light of the world,” lest they should imagine that anything was attributed to them which was to be understood of Christ alone, and thus the lamps should be extinguished by the wind of pride, when He had said, “Ye are the light of the world,” He immediately subjoined, “A city that is set on a hill cannot be hid; neither do men light a candle and put it under a bushel, but an a candlestick, that it may shine on all that are in the house.” But what if He did not call the apostles the candle, but the lighters of the candle, which they were to put on a candlestick? Hear that He called themselves the candle. “So let your light shine,” saith He, “before men, that they, seeing your good works, may glorify,” not you, but “your Father who is in heaven.”

Omnes enim homines lucernae, quia et accendi possunt et exstingui. Et lucernae quidem cum sapiunt, lucent, et spiritu fervent: nam et si ardebant et exstinctae sunt, etiam putent. Permanserunt enim servi Dei lucernae bonae ex oleo misericordiae illius, non ex viribus suis. Gratia quippe Dei gratuita, illa oleum lucernarum est. Plus enim illis omnibus laboravi, ait quaedam lucerna; et ne viribus suis ardere videretur, adjunxit, Non ego autem, sed gratia Dei mecum . Omnis ergo prophetia ante Domini adventum, lucerna est: de qua dicit Petrus apostolus, Habemus certiorem propheticum sermonem, cui bene facitis intendentes, quemadmodum lucernae lucenti in obscuro loco, donec dies lucescat, et lucifer oriatur in cordibus vestris . Lucernae itaque Prophetae, et omnis prophetia una magna lucerna. Quid Apostoli? non lucernae etiam ipsi? Plane lucernae. Solus enim ille non lucerna. Non enim accenditur et exstinguitur: quia sicut Pater habet vitam in semetipso, sic dedit Filio habere vitam in semetipso. Lucernae ergo et Apostoli; et gratias agunt, quia et accensi sunt lumine Veritatis, et fervent Spiritu charitatis, et suppetit illis oleum gratiae Dei. Si non essent lucernae, non diceret illis Dominus, Vos estis lumen mundi. Nam posteaquam dixit, Vos estis lumen mundi, ostendit ne tale lumen se putarent, quale dictum est, Erat lumen verum, quod illuminat omnem hominem venientem in hunc mundum. Tunc autem hoc de Domino dictum est, cum a Joanne distingueretur. De Joanne quippe Baptista dictum erat, Non erat ille lumen, sed ut testimonium perhiberet de lumine . Et ne diceres, Quomodo lumen non erat, de quo Christus dicit, quia lucerna erat? In comparatione alterius luminis non erat lumen. Erat enim verum lumen, quod illuminat omnem hominem venientem in hunc mundum. Ergo cum et discipulis diceret, Vos estis lumen mundi, ne sibi aliquid tributum putarent, quod de solo Christo intelligendum esset, et ita lucernae vento superbiae exstinguerentur; cum dixisset, Vos estis lumen mundi, continuo subjunxit, Non potest civitas abscondi supra montem constituta, neque accendunt lucernam et ponunt eam sub modio, sed super candelabrum, ut luceat omnibus qui in domo sunt. Sed quid, si Apostolos non dixit lucernam, sed accensores lucernae quam ponerent super candelabrum? Audi quia ipsos dixit lucernam. Sic luceat, inquit, lumen vestrum coram hominibus, ut videntes bona opera vestra glorificent, non vos, sed Patrem vestrum qui in coelis est .

23.4 PL 35, 1584

4. Wherefore both Moses bore witness to Christ, and John bore witness to Christ, and all the other prophets and apostles bore witness to Christ. Before all these testimonies He places the testimony of His own works. Because through those men too, it was God and none other that bore witness to His Son. But yet in another way God bears testimony to His Son. God reveals His Son through the Son Himself, He reveals Himself through the Son. To Him, if a man shall have been able to reach, he shall need no lamps; and by truly digging deep, he will carry down his building to the rock.

Ergo et Moyses perhibuit testimonium Christo, et Joannes perhibuit testimonium Christo, et caeteri Prophetae et Apostoli perhibuerunt testimonium Christo. His omnibus testimoniis praeponit testimonium operum suorum. Quia et per illos nonnisi Deus perhibuit testimonium Filio suo. Sed perhibet alio modo Deus testimonium Filio suo: per ipsum Filium suum indicat Deus Filium, indicat se per Filium. Ad hunc si potuerit homo pervenire, nec lucernis indigebit, et vere fodiendo altius, aedificium perducet ad petram.

23.5 PL 35, 1584

5. The lesson of to-day, brethren, is easy; but on account of what was due yesterday (for I know what I have delayed, not withdrawn, and the Lord has deigned to allow me even to-day to speak to you), recall to mind what you ought to demand, if perhaps, while preserving piety and wholesome humility, we may in some measure stretch out ourselves, not against God, but towards Him, and lift up our soul, pouring it out above us, like the Psalmist, to whom it was said, “Where is thy God?” “On these things,” saith he, “I meditated, and poured out my soul above me.” Therefore let us lift up our soul to God, not against God; for this also is said, “To Thee, O Lord, I have lifted up my soul.” And let us lift it up with His own assistance, for it is heavy. And from what cause is it heavy? Because the body which is corrupt weighs down the soul, and the earthly tabernacle depresses the mind while meditating on many things. Let us try, then, whether we may not be able to withdraw our mind from many things in order to concentrate it on one, and to raise it to one (which indeed we cannot do, as I have said, unless He assist us who wills our souls to be raised to Himself). And so we may apprehend in some measure how the Word of God, the only begotten of the Father, the co-eternal and equal with the Father, doeth not anything except what He seeth the Father doing, whilst yet the Father Himself doeth not anything but through the Son, who seeth Him doing. Since the Lord Jesus, as it seems to me,—willing here to make known some great matter to those that give attention to it, and to pour into those that are capable of receiving, and to rouse, on the other hand, the incapable to assiduity, in order that, while not yet understanding, they may by right living be made capable,—has intimated to us that the human soul and rational mind which is in man, not in the beast, is invigorated, enlightened, and made happy in no other way than by the very substance of God: that the soul itself gets somewhat by and of the body, and yet holds the body subject to it, while the senses of the body can be soothed and delighted by things bodily, and that because of this kind of fellowship of soul and body in this life, and in this mutual embrace of theirs, the soul is delighted when the bodily senses are soothed, and saddened when they are offended; while yet the happiness by which the soul itself is made happy cannot be realized but by a participation of that ever-living, unchangeable life, of that eternal substance, which is God: that as the soul, which is inferior to God, causes the body, which is inferior to itself, to live, so that alone which is superior to the soul can cause that same soul to live happily. For the soul is higher than the body, and higher than the soul is God. It bestows something on its inferior, while there is something bestowed on itself by the superior. Let it serve its Lord, that it may not be trampled on by its own servant. This, brethren, is the Christian religion, which is preached through the whole world, while its enemies are dismayed; who, where they are conquered, murmur, and fiercely rage against it where they prevail. This is the Christian religion, that one God be worshipped, not many gods, because only one God can make the soul happy. It is made happy by participation of God. Not by participation of a holy soul does the feeble soul become happy, nor by participation of an angel does the holy soul become happy; but if the feeble soul seeks to be happy, let it seek that by which the holy soul is made happy. For thou art made happy, not of an angel, but the angel as well as thou of the same source.

Facilis est ergo, fratres, hodierna lectio: sed propter hesternum debitum (scio enim quid distulerim, non abstulerim, et Dominus dignatus est donare etiam hodie loqui ad vos), recordamini quid reposcere debeatis, si forte aliquo modo servata pietate et salubri humilitate, extendamus nos non adversus Deum, sed ad Deum; et levemus ad eum animam nostram, effundentes eam super nos, sicut ille in Psalmo, cui dicebatur, Ubi est Deus tuus? Haec, inquit, meditatus sum, et effudi super me animam meam . Levemus ergo animam ad Deum, non contra Deum; quia et hoc dictum est, Ad te, Domine, levavi animam meam . Et levemus adjuvante ipso; nam gravis est. Unde autem gravis est? Quia corpus quod corrumpitur, aggravat animam, et deprimit terrena inhabitatio sensum multa cogitantem . Ne forte ergo possimus sensum nostrum a multis colligere ad unum, et evulsum a multis relevare ad unum (quod quidem non poterimus, ut dixi, nisi adjuvet ille qui ad se vult levari animas nostras), et contingamus ex aliqua parte, quomodo Verbum Dei unicus Patri, coaeternus et aequalis Patri, non faciat nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem, cum tamen Pater ipse non faciat aliquid nisi per Filium videntem. Videtur mihi quoniam Dominus Jesus in hoc loco magnum quiddam insinuare volens intentis, et infundere capacibus, incapaces autem excitare ad studium, ut nondum intelligentes bene vivendo capaces fiant, insinuavit nobis animam humanam et mentem rationalem, quae inest homini, non inest pecori, non vegetari, non beatificari, non illuminari, nisi ab ipsa substantia Dei: eamque animam facere aliquid per corpus et de corpore, atque habere subjectum corpus, et per corporalia mulceri posse sensus corporis vel offendi, et propter hoc, id est propter consortium quoddam animae et corporis in hac vita atque complexu, delectari animam lenitis, vel contristari offensis corporis sensibus; beatitudinem tamen ejus qua fit beata ipsa anima, non fieri nisi participatione illius vitae semper vivae, incommutabilis, aeternaeque substantiae, quae Deus est: ut quomodo anima quae inferior Deo est, id quod ipsa inferius est, hoc est corpus, facit vivere; sic eamdem animam non faciat beate vivere, nisi quod ipsa anima est superius. Superior enim anima quam corpus, et superior quam anima Deus. Praestat aliquid inferiori, praestatur illi a superiore. Serviat Domino suo, ne conculcetur a servo suo. Haec est, fratres mei, religio christiana, quae praedicatur per totum mundum, horrentibus inimicis; et ubi vincuntur, murmurantibus; ubi praevalent, saevientibus. Haec est religio christiana, ut colatur unus Deus, non multi dii; quia non facit animam beatam nisi unus Deus. Participatione Dei fit beata. Non participatione sanctae animae fit beata infirma anima, nec participatione angeli fit beata sancta anima: sed si quaerit beata esse infirma anima, quaerat unde beata sit sancta anima. Non enim beatus efficeris ex angelo tu; sed unde angelus, inde et tu.

23.6 PL 35, 1585

6. These things being premised and firmly established,—that the rational soul is made happy only by God, that the body is enlivened only by the soul, and that the soul is a something intermediate between God and the body,—direct your thoughts to, and recollect with me, not the passage read to-day, of which we have spoken enough, but that of yesterday, which we have been turning over and handling these three days, and, to the best of our abilities, digging into until we should come to the rock. The Word Christ, Christ the Word of God with God, Christ the Word and the Word God, Christ and God and Word one God. To this press on; O soul, despising, or even transcending all things else, to this press on. There is nothing more powerful than this creature, which is called the rational mind, nothing more sublime: whatever is above this, is but the Creator. But I was saying that Christ is the Word, and Christ is the Word of God, and Christ the Word is God; but Christ is not only the Word, since “the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us:” therefore Christ is both Word and flesh. For when “He was in the form of God, He thought it not robbery to be equal with God.” And what of us in our low estate, who, feeble and crawling on the ground, were not able to reach unto God, were we to be abandoned? God forbid. “He emptied Himself, taking upon Him the form of a servant;” not, therefore, by losing the form of God. He became man who was God, by receiving what He was not, not by losing what He was: so God became man. There thou hast something for thy weakness, something for thy perfection. Let Christ raise thee by that which is man, lead thee by that which is God-man, and guide thee through to that which is God. And the whole preaching and dispensation by Christ is this, brethren, and there is not another, that souls may be raised again, and that bodies also may be raised again. For each of the two was dead; the body by weakness, the soul by iniquity. Because each was dead, each may rise again. What each? Soul and body. By what, then, can the soul rise again but by Christ God? By what the body, but by the man Christ? For there was also in Christ a human soul, a whole soul; not merely the irrational part of the soul, but also the rational, which is called mind. For there have been certain heretics, and they have been driven out of the Church, who fancied that the body of Christ did not have in it a rational mind, but, as it were, the animal life of a beast; since, without the rational mind, life is only animal life. But because they were driven out, and driven out by the truth, accept thou the whole Christ, Word, rational mind, and flesh. This is the whole Christ. Let thy soul rise again from iniquity by that which is God, thy body from corruption by that which is man. There, most beloved, hear ye what, so far as it appears to me, is the great profundity of this passage; and see how Christ here speaks to the effect, that the only reason why He came is, in order that souls may have a resurrection from iniquity, and bodies from corruption. I have already said by what our souls are raised, by the very substance of God; by what our bodies are raised, by the human dispensation of our Lord Jesus Christ.

His praemissis atque firmissime constitutis, animam rationalem non beatificari nisi a Deo, corpus non vegetari nisi per animam, atque esse quamdam medietatem inter Deum et corpus, animam; intendite et recolite mecum, non hodiernam, de qua sufficienter locuti sumus, sed hesternam lectionem, quam ecce jam triduo versamus atque tractamus, et pro viribus fodimus, donec ad petram perveniamus. Verbum Christus, Verbum Dei Christus apud Deum, Verbum Christus et Deus Verbum, Christus et Deus et Verbum unus Deus. Illuc perge, anima, contemptis caeteris, vel etiam transcensis; illuc perge. Nihil potentius ista creatura, quae mens dicitur rationalis, nihil hac creatura sublimius: quidquid supra istam est, jam Creator est. Dicebam autem quia Verbum Christus, et Verbum Dei Christus, et Deus Verbum Christus; sed non tantum Verbum Christus, quia Verbum caro factum est, et habitavit in nobis : ergo et Verbum et caro Christus. Cum enim in forma Dei esset, non rapinam arbitratus est esse aequalis Deo. Et quid nos in imo, qui non poteramus infirmi et humi repentes attingere Deum, numquid relinquendi eramus? Absit. Semetipsum exinanivit formam servi accipiens . Non ergo formam Dei amittens. Factus est ergo homo qui erat Deus, accipiendo quod non erat, non amittendo quod erat: ita factus est homo Deus. Ibi habes aliquid propter infirmitatem tuam, ibi habes aliud propter perfectionem tuam. Erigat te Christus per id quod homo est, ducat te per id quod Deus homo est, perducat te ad id quod Deus est. Et tota praedicatio dispensatioque per Christum haec est, fratres, et alia non est, ut resurgant animae, resurgant et corpora. Utrumque quippe mortuum erat; corpus ex infirmitate, anima ex iniquitate. Quia utrumque mortuum erat, resurgat utrumque. Quid utrumque? Anima et corpus. Per quid ergo anima, nisi per Deum Christum? Per quid corpus, nisi per hominem Christum? Erat enim et in Christo anima humana, tota anima: non irrationale tantum animae, sed etiam rationale quod mens dicitur. Fuerunt enim quidam haeretici, et pulsi sunt ab Ecclesia, qui putarent non habere mentem rationalem corpus Christi, sed quasi animam belluinam: excepta quippe rationali mente, vita belluina est. Sed quia expulsi sunt, et veritate expulsi sunt; accipe totum Christum, Verbum, mentem rationalem, et carnem. Hoc totum Christus est. Resurgat anima tua ab iniquitate per id quod Deus est, resurgat corpus tuum a corruptione per id quod homo est. Proinde, charissimi, audite magnam lectionis hujus, quantum mihi videtur, profunditatem; et videte quemadmodum loquatur hic Christus, nihil aliud quam quare venerit Christus, ut resurgant animae ab iniquitate, resurgant corpora a corruptione. Jam dixi animae per quid resurgant, per ipsam substantiam Dei; corpora per quid resurgant, per dispensationem humanam Domini nostri Jesu Christi.

23.7 PL 35, 1586

7. “Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son cannot of Himself do anything, but what He seeth the Father doing; for what things soever He has done, these also the Son doeth in like manner.” Yes, the heaven, the earth, the sea; the things that are in heaven, on the earth, and in the sea; the visible and invisible, the animals on the land, the plants in the fields, the creatures that swim in the waters, that fly in the air, that shine in heaven; besides all these, angels, virtues, thrones, dominations, principalities, powers; “all were made by Him.” Did God make all these, and show them when made to the Son, that He also should make another world full of all these? Certainly not. But, on the contrary, what does He say? “For what things soever He has made, these,” not others, but “these also the Son doeth,” not differently, “but in like manner.” “For the Father loveth the Son, and showeth Him all things which Himself doeth.” The Father showeth to the Son that souls may be raised, for souls are raised up by the Father and the Son; nor can souls live except God be their life. If souls, then, cannot live unless God be their life, just as themselves are the life of bodies; what the Father shows to the Son, that is, what He doeth, He doeth through the Son. For it is not by doing that He shows to the Son, but by showing He doeth through the Son. For the Son sees the Father showing before anything is done; and from the Father’s showing and the Son’s vision, is done what is done by the Father through the Son. So are souls raised up, if they can see that conjunction of unity, the Father showing, the Son seeing, and the creature made by the Father’s showing and the Son’s seeing; and that thing made by the Father’s showing and the Son’s seeing, which is neither the Father nor the Son, but beneath the Father and the Son, whatever is made by the Father through the Son. Who sees this?

Amen, amen dico vobis, non potest a se Filius facere quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem: quaecumque enim ille fecerit, haec et Filius similiter facit. Coelum, terram, mare, quae in coelo, quae in terra, quae in mari, visibilia, invisibilia, animalia in terris, fruteta in agris, natantia in aquis, in aere volantia, in coelo lucentia; praeter haec omnia, Angelos, Virtutes, Sedes, Dominationes, Principatus, Potestates: omnia per ipsum facta sunt . Numquid Deus omnia haec fecit, et demonstravit ea facta Filio, ut et ipse faceret alterum mundum his omnibus plenum? Non utique. Sed quid? Quaecumque enim ille fecerit, haec, non alia, sed haec et Filius, nec dissimiliter, sed similiter facit. Pater enim diligit Filium, et omnia demonstrat ei quae ipse facit. Demonstrat Pater Filio ut animae suscitentur, quia per Patrem et Filium animae suscitantur: nec possunt vivere animae, nisi earum vita sit Deus. Si ergo non possunt vivere animae, nisi earum vita sit Deus, sicut ipsae sunt vita corporum; quod demonstrat Pater Filio, id est quod facit, per Filium facit. Non enim faciendo demonstrat Filio, sed demonstrando facit per Filium. Videt enim Filius Patrem demonstrantem antequam aliquid fiat, et ex demonstratione Patris et visione Filii fit quod fit a Patre per Filium. Sic animae suscitantur, si potuerint videre istam unitatis conjunctionem, Patrem demonstrantem, Filium videntem, et per Patris demonstrationem et Filii visionem fieri creaturam: atque id fieri per Patris demonstrationem et Filii visionem, quod nec Pater sit nec Filius, sed infra Patrem et Filium, quidquid fit a Patre per Filium. Quis hoc videt?

23.8 PL 35, 1586

8. Behold, again we humble ourselves to carnal notions, and descend to you, if indeed we had at any time ascended somewhat from you. Thou wishest to show something to thy son, that he may do what thou doest; thou art about to do, and thus to show the thing. Therefore, what thou art about to do, in order to show it to thy son, thou doest not surely by thy son; but thou alone doest that thing which, when done, he may see, and do another such thing in like manner. This is not the case there; why goest thou on to thy own similitude, and blottest out the similitude of God within thee? There, the case is wholly otherwise. Find a case in which thou showest to thy son what thou doest before thou doest it; so that, after thou hast shown it, it will be by the son thou doest. Perhaps something like this now occurs to thee: Lo, sayest thou, I think to make a house, and I wish it to be built by my son: before I build it myself, I point out to my son what I mean to do: both he doeth, and I too by him to whom I pointed out my wish. Thou hast retreated, indeed, from the former similitude, but still thou liest in great dissimilitude. For, lo, before thou canst make the house, thou dost inform thy son, and point out to him what thou meanest to do; that, upon thy showing before thou makest, he may make what thou hast shown, and so thou mayest make by him: but thou wilt speak words to thy son, words will have to pass between thee and him; between the person showing and the person seeing, between speaker and hearer, flies articulate sound, which is not what thou art, nor what he is. That sound, indeed, which goes out of thy mouth, and by the concussion of the air touches thy son’s ear, and filling the sense of hearing, conveys thy thought to his heart; that sound, I say, is not thyself, nor thy son. A sign is given from thy mind to thy son’s mind, but that sign not either thy mind or thy son’s mind, but something else. Is it thus that we think the Father has spoken to the Son? Were there words between the Father and the Word? Then how is it? Or, whatever the Father would say to the Son, if He would say it by a word, the Son Himself is the Word of the Father, would He speak by a word to the Word? Or, since the Son is the great Word, had smaller words to pass between the Father and Son? Was it so, that some sound, as it were a temporal, fleeting creature, had to issue from the mouth of the Father, and strike upon the ear of the Son? Has God a body, that this should proceed, as it were, from His lips? And has the Word the ears of a body, into which sound may come? Lay aside all notions of corporeal forms, regard simplicity, if thou art single-minded. But how wilt thou be single-minded? If thou wilt not entangle thyself with the world, but disentangle thyself from the world. For by disentangling thyself, thou wilt be single-minded. And see, if thou canst, what I say; or if thou canst not, believe what thou dost not see. Thou speakest to thy son; thou speakest by a word: neither art thou, nor is thy son, the word that sounds.

Ecce iterum ad carnales sensus, ecce rursus humiliamus nos, et descendimus ad vos, si tamen aliquid aliquando ascenderamus a vobis. Vis demonstrare aliquid filio tuo, ut faciat quod facis: facturus es tu, et sic demonstraturus. Quod igitur facturus es ut demonstres filio, non utique facis per filium: sed tu solus facis quod ipse factum videat, et aliud tale similiter faciat. Non est hoc ibi: quid pergis ad similitudinem tuam, et deles in te similitudinem Dei? Ibi omnino non est hoc. Inveni aliquid, quomodo demonstres filio tuo quod facis, antequam facis; ut cum demonstraveris, per filium facias hoc quod facis. Jam forte quasi occurrit tibi: Ecce, inquis, cogito facere domum, et volo ut per filium meum fabricetur: antequam eam ipse fabricem, ostendo filio meo quod facere volo; et facit ipse, atque ego per ipsum, cui ostendi voluntatem meam. Recessisti quidem a pristina similitudine, sed adhuc jaces in magna dissimilitudine. Ecce enim antequam facias domum, indicas filio tuo, et demonstras quid facere velis; ut te demonstrante antequam facias, faciat ipse quod demonstraveris, et tu per ipsum: sed verba dicturus es filio tuo, inter te et ipsum verba cursura sunt; et inter demonstrantem et videntem, vel loquentem et audientem sonus articulatus volat, qui non est quod tu, non est quod ipse. Sonus quippe ille qui exit de ore tuo, et verberato aere tangit aurem filii tui, et impleto sensu audiendi perducit ad cor cogitationem tuam; sonus ergo ille, non est ipse tu, non est ipse filius tuus. Signum datum est ab animo tuo animo filii tui, quod signum non sit nec animus tuus, nec animus filii tui, sed aliud aliquid. Itane putamus Patrem locutum esse cum Filio? Fuerunt verba inter Deum et Verbum? quomodo istud est? An quidquid vellet Pater dicere Filio, si verbo vellet dicere, ipse Filius est Verbum Patris, numquid per verbum loqueretur ad Verbum? An quia Filius magnum Verbum, minora verba cursura erant inter Patrem et Filium? Sonus aliquis et quasi creatura quaedam temporalis atque volatica, exitura erat ex ore Patris, et percussura aurem Filii? Numquid habet Deus corpus, ut quasi ex ejus labiis hoc procedat; et habet aures corporis Verbum, in quas sonus veniat? Remove omnia corporalia, simplicitatem vide, si simplex es. Quomodo autem eris simplex? Si te non mundo implicaveris, sed ex mundo explicaveris: explicando enim te simplex eris. Et vide si potes quod dico, aut si non potes, crede quod non vides. Dicis filio tuo, verbo dicis; verbum quod sonat, nec tu es, nec filius tuus.

23.9 PL 35, 1587

9. I have, sayest thou, another method of showing; for so well instructed is my son, that he hears without my speaking, but I show him by a nod what to do. Lo, show him by a nod what thou wilt, yet certainly the mind holds within itself that which it would show. By what dost thou give this nod? With the body,—namely, with the lips, the look, the brows, the eyes, the hands. All these are not what thy mind is: these, too, are media; there was something understood by these signs which are not what thy mind is, not what the mind of thy son is; but all this which thou doest by the body is beneath thy mind, and beneath the mind of thy son: nor can thy son know thy mind, unless thou give him signs by the body. What, then, do I say? This is not the case there; there all is simplicity. The Father shows to the Son what He is doing, and by showing begets the Son. I see what I have said; but because I see also to whom I have said it, may such understanding be some time or other formed in you as to grasp it. If ye are not able now to comprehend what God is, comprehend at least what God is not: you will have made much progress, if you think of God as being not something other than He is. God is not a body, not the earth, not the heaven, not the moon, or sun, or stars—not these corporeal things. For if not heavenly things, how much less is He earthly things! Put all body out of the question. Further, hear another thing: God is not a mutable spirit. For I confess,—and it must be confessed, for it is the Gospel that speaks it,—“God is a Spirit.” But pass beyond all mutable spirit, beyond all spirit that now knows, now knows not; that now remembers, now forgets; that wills what before it willed not, that wills not what before it willed; either that suffers these mutabilities now or may suffer them: pass beyond all these. Thou findest not any mutability in God; nor aught that may have been one way before, and is otherwise now. For where thou findest alternation, there a kind of death has taken place: since, for a thing not to be what it was, is a death. The soul is said to be immortal; so indeed it is, because it ever lives, and there is in it a certain continuous life, but yet a mutable life. According to the mutability of this life, it may be said to be mortal; because if it lived wisely, and then becomes foolish, it dies for the worse; if it lived foolishly, and becomes wise, it dies for the better. For the Scripture teaches us that there is a death for the worse, and that there is a death for the better. In any case, they had died for the worse, of whom it said, “Let the dead bury their dead;” and, “Awake, thou that sleepest, and arise from the dead, and Christ shall give thee light;” and from this passage before us, “When the dead shall hear, and they that hear shall live.” For the worse they had died; therefore do they come to life again. By coming to life they die for the better, because by coming to life again they will not be what they were; but for that to be, which was not, is death. But perhaps it is not called death if it is for the better? The apostle has called that death: “But if ye be dead with Christ from the elements of this world, why do ye judge concerning this world as if ye were still living?” And again, “For ye are dead, and your life is hid with Christ in God.” He wishes us to die that we may live, because we have lived to die. Whatever therefore dies, both from better to worse, and from worse to better, is not God; because neither can supreme goodness proceed to better, nor true eternity to worse. For true eternity is, where is nothing of time. But was there now this, now that? Immediately time is admitted, it is not eternal. For that ye may know that God is not thus, as the soul is,—certainly the soul is immortal,—what, however, saith the apostle of God, “Who alone hath immortality,” unless that he openly says this, He alone hath unchangeableness, because He alone hath true eternity? Therefore no mutability is there.

Habeo, inquis, aliud quo ostendam: ita enim est eruditus filius meus, ut nec loquente me audiat, sed nutu ostendo ei quod faciat. Ecce nutu ostende quod vis, certe animus tuus vult ostendere quod in se habet. Unde facis nutum? De corpore, scilicet, labiis, vultu, superciliis, oculis, manibus. Haec omnia non sunt quod animus tuus; etiam ista media sunt: intellectum est aliquid per haec signa, quae non sunt quod animus tuus, nec quod animus filii tui: sed hoc totum quod corpore agis, infra animum tuum est, et infra animum filii tui; nec potest cognoscere animum tuum filius tuus, nisi dederis ei signa de corpore. Quid igitur facio? Non est hoc ibi, simplicitas ibi est. Pater ostendit Filio quod facit, et ostendendo Filium gignit. Video quid dixerim: sed quia video et quibus dixerim, fiat in vobis intellectus iste quandoque. Nuncsi non potestis comprehendere quid sit Deus, vel hoc comprehendite quid non sit Deus: multum profeceritis, si non aliud quam est, de Deo senseritis. Nondum potes pervenire ad quid sit, perveni ad quid non sit. Non est Deus corpus, non terra, non coelum, non luna, non sol, non stellae, non corporalia ista. Si enim non coelestia, quanto minus terrena? Tolle omne corpus. Adhuc audi aliud: non est Deus mutabilis spiritus. Nam fateor, et fatendum est, quia Evangelium loquitur, Deus spiritus est. Sed transi omnem mutabilem spiritum, transi spiritum qui modo scit, modo nescit, modo meminit, et obliviscitur; vult quod nolebat, non vult quod volebat; sive patiatur jam istas mutabilitates, sive pati possit: transi haec omnia. Non invenis in Deo aliquid mutabilitatis, non aliquid quod aliter nunc sit, aliter paulo ante fuerit. Nam ubi invenis aliter et aliter, facta est ibi quaedam mors: mors enim est, non esse quod fuit. Immortalis dicitur anima: est quidem, quia vivit semper anima, et est in illa quaedam vita permanens, sed mutabilis vita. Secundum mutabilitatem vitae hujus et mortalis dici potest: quia si vivebat sapienter, et desipit, mortua est in deterius; si vivebat insipienter, et sapit, mortua est in melius. Nam esse mortem in deterius, esse mortem in melius Scriptura nos docet. Utique in deterius mortui erant, de quibus dicitur, Sine mortuos, sepeliant mortuos suos ; et, Surge, qui dormis, et exsurge a mortuis, et illuminabit te Christus ; et de hac lectione, Quando mortui audient, et qui audierint vivent. In deterius mortui erant, ideo reviviscunt. Reviviscendo moriuntur in melius, quia et reviviscendo non erunt quod erant: non esse autem quod erat, mors est. Sed forte, si in melius est, non appellatur mors? Appellavit illam mortem Apostolus: Si autem mortui estis cum Christo ab elementis hujus mundi, quid adhuc velut viventes de hoc mundo decernitis ? et iterum, Mortui enim estis, et vita vestra abscondita est cum Christo in Deo . Mori nos vult ut vivamus, quia viximus ut moreremur. Quidquid ergo et a meliore in deterius, et a deteriore in melius moritur, non est hoc Deus: quia neque in melius ire potest summa bonitas, neque in deterius vera aeternitas. Vera enim aeternitas est, ubi temporis nihil est. Erat autem modo hoc, et modo illud? jam tempus admissum est, aeternum non est. Nam ut noveritis quia non sic Deus quomodo anima: certe immortalis est anima; quid ergo est quod ait Apostolus de Deo, Qui solus habet immortalitatem ; nisi quia hoc aperte dixit, Solus habet incommutabilitatem, quia solus habet veram aeternitatem? Ergo ibi nulla mutabilitas.

23.10 PL 35, 1588

10. Recognize in thyself something which I wish to say within, in thyself; not within as if in thy body, for in a sense one may say, “in thyself.” For there is in thee health, thy age whatever it be, but this in regard to the body. In thee is thy hand and thy foot; but there is one thing in thee, within; another thing in thee as in thy garment. But leave outside thy garment and thyself, descend into thyself, go to thy secret place, thy mind, and there see, if thou canst, what I wish to say. For if thou art far from thyself, how canst thou come near to God? I was speaking of God, and thou believedst that thou wouldst understand. I am speaking of the soul, I am speaking of thyself: understand this, there I will try thee. For I do not travel very far for examples, when I mean to give thee some similitude to thy God from thy own mind; because surely not in the body, but in that same mind, was man made after the image of God. Let us seek God in His own similitude; let us recognize the Creator in His own image. There within, if we can, let us find this that we speak of,—how the Father shows to the Son, and how the Son sees what the Father shows, before anything is made by the Father through the Son. But when I shall have spoken, and thou hast understood, thou must not think that spoken of to be something just such as our example, that thou mayest therein keep piety, which I wish to be kept by thee, and earnestly admonish thee to keep: that is, if thou art not able to comprehend what God is, do not think it a small matter for thee to know what He is not.

Agnosce in te aliquid, quod volo dicere, intus, intus in te; non in te quasi in corpore tuo, nam et ibi potest dici in te. In te est enim sanitas, in te quaelibet aetas, sed secundum corpus; in te est manus, pes tuus: sed aliud est in te intus, aliud in te tanquam in veste tua. Sed relinque foris et vestem tuam et carnem tuam, descende in te, adi secretarium tuum, mentem tuam, et ibi vide quod volo dicere, si potueris. Si enim tu ipse a te longe es, Deo propinquare unde potes? Dicebam de Deo; et intellecturum te arbitrabaris: de anima dico, de te dico; intellige, ibi te probabo. Non enim valde longe pergo in exempla, quando de mente tua volo aliquam similitudinem dare ad Deum tuum; quia utique non in corpore, sed in ipsa mente factus est homo ad imaginem Dei. In similitudine sua Deum quaeramus, in imagine sua Creatorem agnoscamus. Ibi intus, si potuerimus, inveniamus hoc quod dicimus; quomodo demonstret Pater Filio, et Filius videat quod demonstrat Pater, antequam fiat aliquid a Patre per Filium. Sed cum dixero et intellexeris, nec sic putes jam illud aliquid tale esse, ut serves ibi pietatem, quam volo a te servari, et praecipue moneo: id est, ut si non vales comprehendere Deus quid sit, parum non tibi putes esse scire quid non sit.

23.11 PL 35, 1589

11. Behold, in thy mind, I see some two things, thy memory and thy thought, which is, as it were, the seeing faculty and the vision of thy soul. Thou seest something, and perceivest it by the eyes, and thou committest it to the care of the memory. There, within, is that which thou hast committed to thy memory, laid up in secret as in a storehouse, as in a treasury, as in a kind of secret chamber and inner cabinet. Thou thinkest of something else, thy attention is elsewhere; what thou didst see is in thy memory, but not seen by thee, because thy thought is bent on another thing. I prove this at once. I speak to you who know; I mention by name Carthage; all who know it have instantly seen Carthage within the mind. Are there as many Carthages as there are minds of you? You have all seen it by means of this name, by means of these syllables known to you, rushing forth from my mouth: your ears were touched; the sense of the soul was touched through the body, and the mind bent back from another object to this word, and saw Carthage. Was Carthage made there and then? It was there already, but latent in the memory. Why was latent there? Because thy mind was engaged on another matter; but when thy thought turned back to that which was in the memory, thence it was shaped, and became a kind of vision of the mind. Before, there was not a vision, but there was memory; the vision was made by the turning back of thought to memory. Thy memory, then, showed Carthage to thy thought; and that which was in it before thou didst direct thy mind to the memory, it exhibited to the attention of thy thought when turned upon it. Behold, a showing is effected by the memory, and a vision is produced in thought; and no words passed between, no sign was given from the body: thou didst neither nod, nor write, nor utter a sound; and yet thought saw what the memory showed. But both that which showed, and that to which it showed, are of the same substance. But yet, that thy memory might have Carthage in it, the image was drawn in through the eyes, for thou didst see what thou didst store up in thy memory. So hast thou seen the tree which thou rememberest; so the mountain, the river; so the face of a friend, of an enemy, of father, mother, brother, sister, son, neighbor; so of letters written in a book, of the book itself; so of this church: all these thou didst see, and didst commit to thy memory after they were seen; and didst, as it were, lay up there what thou mightst by thinking see at will, even when they should be absent from these eyes of the body. Thou sawest Carthage when thou wast at Carthage; thy soul received the image by the eyes; this image was laid up in thy memory; and thou, the person who wast present at Carthage, didst keep something within thee which thou mightst be able to see with thyself, even when thou shouldst not be there. All these things thou didst receive from without. What the Father shows to the Son, He does not receive from without: all comes to pass within, because there would be no creature at all without, unless the Father had made it by the Son. Every creature was made by God; before it was made it was not in being. It was not therefore seen, after being made and retained in memory, that the Father might show it to the Son, as the memory might show to thought; but, on the contrary, the Father showed it to be made, the Son saw it to be made; and the Father made it by showing, because He made it by the Son seeing. And therefore we ought not to be surprised that it is said, “But what He seeth the Father doing,” not showing. For by this it is intimated that, with the Father, to do and to show is the same thing; that hence we may understand that He doeth all things by the Son seeing. Neither is that showing, nor that seeing, temporal. Forasmuch as all times are made by the Son, they could not certainly be shown to Him at any point of time to be made. But the Father’s showing begets the Son’s seeing, just in the same manner as the Father begets the Son. For the showing produces the seeing, not the seeing the showing. And if we were able to look into this matter more purely and perfectly, perhaps we should find that the Father is not one thing, His showing another; nor the Son one thing, His seeing another. But if we have hardly apprehended this,—if we have hardly been able to explain how the memory exhibits to the thought what it has received from without,—how much less can we take in or explain how God the Father shows to the Son, what He has not from elsewhere, or that which is not other than Himself! We are only little ones: I tell you what God is not, do not show you what God is. What shall we do, then, that we may apprehend what He is? Can ye do this by or through me? I say this to the little ones, both to you and to myself; there is by whom we can: we have just now sung, just now heard, “Cast thy care upon the Lord, and He will nourish thee.” The reason why thou art not able, O man, is because thou art a little one; being a little one, thou must be nourished; being nourished, thou wilt become full-grown; and what as a little one thou couldst not, thou shalt see when full-grown; but that thou mayest be nourished, “cast thy care upon the Lord, and He will nourish thee.”

Ecce in mente tua video aliqua duo, memoriam tuam et cogitationem tuam, id est, quasi aciem quamdam et obtutum animae tuae. Vides aliquid, et per oculos percipis, et commendas memoriae: ibi est intus quod memoriae commendasti, in abdito reconditum quasi in horreo, quasi in thesauro, quasi in secretario quodam et penetrali interiore. Cogitas aliunde, intentio tua alibi est; illud quod vidisti in memoria tua est, et non videtur a te, quia cogitatio tua in aliud intenditur. Modo probo, scientibus loquor: Carthaginem nomino, omnes modo intus quicumque eam nostis, vidistis Carthaginem. Numquid tot sunt Carthagines quot animae vestrae? Omnes vidistis per nomen hoc: per quatuor has syllabas notas vobis, erumpentes ex ore meo, tactae sunt aures vestrae, tactus est sensus animae per corpus, et ab alia intentione reflexus est animus ad id quod ibi erat, et vidit Carthaginem. Numquid tunc est ibi Carthago facta? Jam ibi erat, sed latebat. Quare ibi latebat? Quia animus tuus in aliud attendebat: cum vero reflexa est cogitatio tua ad id quod erat in memoria, inde formata est, et visio quaedam animi facta est. Antea non erat visio, sed erat memoria: reflexa cogitatione ad memoriam, facta est visio. Demonstravit ergo memoria tua cogitationi tuae Carthaginem, et quod in illa erat antequam intenderes, conversae ad se intentioni cogitationis ostendit. Ecce facta est a memoria demonstratio, facta est in cogitatione visio; et nulla verba in medio cucurrerunt, nullum ex corpore signum datum est; nec innuisti, nec scripsisti, nec sonuisti; et tamen cogitatio vidit quod memoria demonstravit. Ejusdem autem substantiae est, et quae demonstravit, et cui demonstravit. Sed Carthaginem ut haberet memoria tua, per oculos hausta est imago haec: vidisti enim quod in memoria reconderes. Sic arborem quam meministi vidisti, sic montem, sic fluvium, sic amici faciem, sic inimici, sic patris, matris, fratris, sororis, filii, vicini; sic litterarum in codice conscriptarum, sic ipsius codicis, sic hujus basilicae: omnia ista vidisti, et visa quia jam erant, memoriae commendasti; et tanquam posuisti illic quae videres cogitando cum velles, etiam cum ab istis corporis oculis abfuissent. Vidisti enim Carthaginem cum esses Carthagini, accepit speciem per oculos anima tua; haec species recondita est in memoria tua, et servasti aliquid intus homo apud Carthaginem constitutus, quod posses apud te videre etiam cum ibi non esses. Haec omnia forinsecus accepisti. Pater quae demonstrat Filio, non accipit extrinsecus: intus totum agitur; quia nihil creaturarum esset extrinsecus, nisi hoc Pater fecisset per Filium. Creatura omnis a Deo facta est; antequam fieret non erat. Non ergo facta visa est et retenta memoriter, ut eam Pater Filio tanquam memoria cogitationi monstraret: sed faciendam Pater monstravit, faciendam Filius vidit, et eam Pater demonstrando fecit, quia per Filium videntem fecit. Et ideo movere non debet, quia dictum est, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem: non dictum est, demonstrantem. Per hoc enim significatum est, id esse Patri facere, quod est demonstrare; ut ex hoc intelligatur per Filium videntem omnia facere. Nec illa demonstratio, nec illa visio temporalis est. Quia enim per Filium fiunt omnia tempora, non utique aliquo tempore possent ei demonstrari facienda. Sic autem demonstratio Patris Filii visionem gignit, quemadmodum Pater Filium gignit. Demonstratio quippe generat visionem, non visio demonstrationem. Quod si purius et perfectius intueri valeremus, fortasse inveniremus nec aliud esse Patrem, aliud ejus demonstrationem; nec aliud Filium, aliud ejus visionem. Sed si vix hoc cepimus, vix explicare potuimus, quomodo memoria quod cepit extrinsecus, ostendat cogitationi; quanto minus capere aut explicare poterimus, quomodo Pater Deus demonstrat Filio quod non habet aliunde, vel quod non est aliud quam ipse? Parvuli sumus; loquor vobis quid non sit Deus, non ostendo quid sit: ergo ut capiamus quid sit, quid faciemus? Numquid a me, numquid per me poteritis? Dicam hoc parvulis, et vobis et mihi: est per quem possimus; modo cantavimus, modo audivimus, Jacta in Dominum curam tuam, et ipse te enutriet . Ideo enim non potes, o homo, quia parvulus es: si parvulus es, nutriendus es: nutritus, grandis eris; et quod parvulus non poteras, grandis videbis: sed ut nutriaris, Jacta in Dominum curam tuam, et ipse te enutriet

23.12 PL 35, 1590

12. Therefore let us now briefly run over what remains, and do you see how the Lord makes known to us the things which I have been here commending to your attention. “The Father loveth the Son, and showeth Him all things which Himself doeth.” Himself raiseth up souls, but by the Son, that the souls raised up may enjoy the substance of God, that is, of the Father and of the Son. “And greater works than these He will show Him.” Greater than which? Than healings of bodies. We have treated of this already, and must not linger upon it now. Greater is the resurrection of the body unto eternity than this healing of the body, wrought in that impotent man, to last only for a time. “And greater works than these He will show Him, that ye may marvel.” “Will show,” as if the act were temporal, therefore as to a man made in time, since God the Word is not made, He by whom all times were made. But Christ was made man in time. We know in what consulship the Virgin Mary brought forth Christ, conceived of the Holy Ghost. Wherefore He, by whom as God the times were made, was made man in time. Hence, just as in time, “He will show Him greater works,” that is, the resurrection of bodies, “that ye may marvel” at the resurrection of bodies wrought by the Son.

Modo ergo percurramus breviter quae restant, et videte hic quae commendavi, quomodo Dominus insinuet. Pater diligit Filium, et omnia demonstrat ei quae ipse facit. Ipse suscitat animas, sed per Filium, ut fruantur animae suscitatae substantia Dei, hoc est Patris et Filii. Et majora his demonstrabit ei opera. Quibus majora? Sanitatibus corporum. Jam et antea tractavimus , nec immorari debemus. Major est enim resurrectio corporis in aeternum, quam haec quae ad tempus facta est in illo languido sanitas corporis. Et majora his demonstrabit ei opera, ut vos miremini. Demonstrabit, quasi temporaliter: ergo quasi homini facto in tempore, quia Verbum Deus non est factus, per quem omnia facta sunt tempora: sed homo factus Christus in tempore. Apparet quo Consule, quo die conceptum de Spiritu sancto virgo Maria peperit Christum: ergo homo factus est in tempore, per quem Deum facta sunt tempora. Ideo tanquam in tempore demonstrabit ei opera majora, id est, resurrectionem corporum, ut vos miremini factam per Filium resurrectionem corporum.

23.13 PL 35, 1591

13. He then returns to that resurrection of souls: “For as the Father raiseth the dead, and quickeneth them, so also the Son quickeneth whom He will;” but this according to the Spirit. The Father quickeneth, the Son quickeneth; the Father whom He will, the Son whom He will; but the Father quickeneth the same as the Son, because all things were made by Him. “For as the Father raiseth up the dead, and quickeneth them, so also the Son quickeneth whom He will.” This is said of the resurrection of souls; but what of the resurrection of bodies? He returns, and says: “For the Father judgeth not any man, but all judgment hath He given to the Son.” The resurrection of souls is effected by the eternal and unchangeable substance of the Father and Son. But the resurrection of bodies is effected by the dispensation of the Son’s humanity, which dispensation is temporal, not co-eternal with the Father. Therefore, when He mentioned judgment, in which there should be a resurrection of bodies, He saith, “For the Father judgeth not any man, but all judgment hath He given to the Son;” but concerning the resurrection of souls, He saith, “Even as the Father raiseth the dead, and quickeneth them, so also the Son quickeneth whom He will.” That, then, the Father and the Son together. But this concerning the resurrection of bodies: “The Father judgeth not any man, but hath given all judgment to the Son; that all may honor the Son, even as they honor the Father.” This is referred to the resurrection of souls. “That all may honor the Son.” How? “Even as they honor the Father.” For the Son works the resurrection of souls in the same manner as the Father doth; the Son quickeneth just as the Father doth. Therefore, in the resurrection of souls, “let all honor the Son as they honor the Father.” But what of the honoring on account of the resurrection of the body? “Whoso honoreth not the Son, honoreth not the Father that sent Him.” He said not even as, but honoreth and honoreth. For the man Christ is honored, but not even as God the Father. Why? Because, with respect to this, He said, “The Father is greater than I.” And when is the Son honored even as the Father is honored? When “in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God; and all things were made by Him.” And hence, in this second honoring, what saith He? “Whoso honoreth not the Son, honoreth not the Father that sent Him.” The Son was not sent, but because He was made man.

Deinde redit ad illam resurrectionem animarum: Sicut enim Pater suscitat mortuos et vivificat, sic et Filius quos vult vivificat, sed secundum spiritum. Vivificat Pater, vivificat Filius; quos vult Pater, quos vult Filius: sed ipsos Pater quos Filius; quia omnia per ipsum facta sunt. Sicut enim Pater suscitat mortuos et vivificat, sic et Filius quos vult vivificat. De resurrectione animarum dictum est hoc: quid de resurrectione corporum? Redit, et dicit, Neque enim Pater judicat quemquam, sed omne judicium dedit Filio. Resurrectio animarum fit per substantiam Patris et Filii aeternam et incommutabilem: resurrectio vero corporum fit per dispensationem humanitatis Filii temporalem, non Patri coaeternam. Ideo cum commemoraret judicium, ubi fieret resurrectio corporum, Non enim Pater, inquit, judicat quemquam, sed omne judicium dedit Filio: de resurrectione autem animarum, Sicut Pater suscitat mortuos et vivificat, sic et Filius quos vult vivificat. Illud ergo simul Pater et Filius: hoc autem de resurrectione corporum, Non judicat Pater quemquam, sed omne judicium dedit Filio. Ut omnes honorificent Filium, sicut honorificant Patrem. Hoc redditum est resurrectioni animarum. Ut omnes honorificent Filium. Quomodo? Sicut honorificant Patrem. Animarum enim resurrectionem sic operatur Filius, quomodo Pater: sic vivificat Filius, quomodo Pater. Ergo in animarum resurrectione omnes honorificent Filium, sicut honorificant Patrem. Quid de honorificatione propter resurrectionem corporis? Qui non honorificat Filium, non honorificat Patrem qui misit illum. Non dixit, sicut; sed, honorificat, et honorificat. Honoratur enim homo Christus, sed non sicut Pater Deus. Quare? Quia secundum hoc dixit, Pater major me est . Quando autem honorificatur Filius, sicut honorificatur Pater? Cum in principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et omnia per ipsum facta sunt . Et ideo in hac honorificatione secunda quid ait? Qui non honorificat Filium, nec honorificat Patrem qui misit illum. Non est missus Filius, nisi quia factus est homo.

23.14 PL 35, 1591

14. “Verily, verily, I say unto you.” Again He returns to the resurrection of souls, that by continual repetition we may apprehend His meaning; because we could not keep up with His discourse hastening on as on wings. Lo, the Word of God lingers with us; lo, it doth, as it were, dwell with our infirmities. He returns again to the mention of the resurrection of souls. “Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whoso heareth my word, and believeth Him that sent me, hath eternal life;” but hath it as from the Father. “For whoso heareth my word, and believeth Him that sent me, hath eternal life” from the Father, by believing the Father that sent the Son. “And shall not come into judgment, but is passed from death to life.” But from the Father, whom he believes, is he quickened. What, dost Thou not quicken? See that the Son also “quickeneth whom He will.” “Verily, verily, I say unto you, That the hour cometh when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God, and they that hear shall live.” Here He did not say, they shall believe Him that sent me, and therefore shall live; but by hearing the voice of the Son of God, “they that hear,” that is, they that obey the Son of God, “shall live.” Therefore, both from the Father shall they live, when they will believe the Father; and from the Son shall they live, when they will hear the voice of the Son of God. Why shall they live both from the Father and from the Son? “For even as the Father hath life in Himself, so also hath He given to the Son to have life in Himself.”

Amen, amen dico vobis. Iterum redit ad resurrectionem animarum, ut assidue dicentem capiamus: quia velut volantem sermonem sequi non poteramus; ecce immoratur nobiscum sermo Dei, ecce quasi habitat cum infirmitatibus nostris: redit rursum ad commendationem resurrectionis animarum. Amen, amen dico vobis, quia qui verbum meum audit, et credit ei qui me misit, habet vitam aeternam: sed tanquam ex Patre. Quia qui verbum meum audit, et credit ei qui misit me, ex Patre habet vitam aeternam, credendo in eum qui misit illum. Et in judicium non veniet, sed transiit a morte ad vitam: sed ex Patre vivificatur, cui credit. Quid, tu non vivificas? Vide quia et Filius quos vult vivificat. Amen, amen dico vobis, quia venit hora, quando mortui audient vocem Filii Dei, et qui audierint vivent. Hic non dixit, Credent ei qui misit me, et ideo vivent; sed audiendo vocem Filii Dei, qui audierint, hoc est obaudierint Filio Dei, vivent. Ergo et ex Patre vivent, cum credent Patri; et ex Filio vivent, cum audient vocem Filii Dei. Quare et ex Patre vivent et ex Filio vivent? Sicut enim habet Pater vitam in semetipso, sic dedit Filio habere vitam in semetipso.

23.15 PL 35, 1592

15. He has finished speaking of the resurrection of souls; it remains to speak more evidently of the resurrection of bodies. “And hath given Him authority also to execute judgment:” not only to raise up souls by faith and wisdom, but also to execute judgment. But why this? “Because He is the Son of man.” Therefore the Father doeth something through the Son of man, which He doeth not from His own substance, to which the Son is equal: as, for instance, that He should be born, crucified, dead, and have a resurrection; for not any of these is contingent to the Father. In the same manner also the raising again of bodies. For the raising to life of souls the Father effects from His own substance, by the substance of the Son, in which the Son is equal to Him; because souls are made partakers of that unchangeable light, but not bodies; but the raising again of bodies, the Father effects through the Son of man. For “He hath given Him authority also to execute judgment, because He is the Son of man;” according to that which He said above, “For the Father judgeth not any man.” And to show that He said this of the resurrection of bodies, He goes on: “Marvel not at this, for the hour cometh:” not, and now is; but, “the hour cometh, in which all that are in the graves (this ye have already heard sufficiently explained yesterday) shall hear His voice, and come forth.” Where? Into judgment: “They that have done well, into the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, into the resurrection of judgment.” And dost Thou do this alone, because the Father hath given all judgment to the Son, and judgeth not any man? I, saith He, do it. But how doest Thou it? “I cannot of myself do anything; as I hear, I judge; and my judgment is just.” When He was treating of the resurrection of souls, He did not say, I hear; but, I see. For I hear refers to the command of the Father as giving order. Therefore, now as a man, just as He than whom the Father is greater; as from the form of a servant, not from the form of God, “As I hear, I judge; and my judgment is just.” Whence is the man’s judgment a just one? My brethren, mark well: “Because I seek not my own will, but the will of Him that sent me.”

Implevit de resurrectione animarum; restat evidentius dicere de resurrectione corporum. Et potestatem dedit ei et judicium facere: non solum animas per fidem et sapientiam suscitare, sed et judicium facere. Quare autem haec? Quia filius hominis est. Facit ergo aliquid Pater per Filium hominis, quod non facit ex substantia sua cui aequalis est Filius; sicut ipsum nasci, sicut ipsum crucifigi, sicut ipsum mori, sicut ipsum resurgere: non enim aliquid horum Patri contigit. Sic et resuscitationem corporum. Nam resuscitationem animarum ex substantia sua Pater facit per substantiam Filii, qua illi aequalis est; animae quippe fiunt participes illius incommutabilis lucis, non corpora: resuscitationem autem corporum Pater facit per filium hominis. Et potestatem enim dedit ei et judicium facere, quia filius hominis est: secundum illud quod supra dixit, Neque enim Pater judicat quemquam. Et ut ostendat quia de resurrectione corporum hoc dixit: Nolite mirari hoc, quia venit hora. Non nunc est, sed venit hora, in qua omnes qui in monumentis sunt , audient vocem ejus et procedent. Et ubi? In judicium: Qui bene fecerunt, in resurrectionem vitae; qui male egerunt, in resurrectionem judicii. Et tu hoc facis solus, quia omne judicium Filio Pater dedit, et non judicat quemquam? Ego, inquit, facio. Sed quomodo facis? Non possum a me facere quidquam: sicut audio judico, et judicium meum justum est. Cum ageretur de resurrectione animarum, non dicebat, Audio; sed, video. Audio enim, tanquam praecipientis Patris imperium. Jam ergo sicut homo, sicut quo major est Pater; jam ex forma servi, non ex forma Dei, sicut audio, judico; et judicium meum justum est. Unde est judicium justum hominis? Fratres mei, attendite: Quia non quaero voluntatem meam, sed voluntatem ejus qui misit me.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Salva per dopo

Inserisci la tua email: ti invieremo un link per accedere. Nessuna password. Ciò che salvi (voci, versetti, capitoli, documenti) ti segue su ogni dispositivo.